Introduction to Behaviour at Work
1
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WORKPLACE DYNAMICS: APPLYING SOCIAL IDENTITY
THEORY AND UTILITARIANISM
By Name
The Name of the Class (Course)
Professor (Tutor)
The Name of the School (University)
The City and State
The Date
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
2
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WORKPLACE DYNAMICS: APPLYING SOCIAL IDENTITY
THEORY AND UTILITARIANISM
Introduction
Teams work well in both academic settings and when volunteering together. How these
groups function depends heavily on the dynamics of the group and some theoretical frameworks
can teach us how culture has shaped these dynamics. The group dynamics assessment using
insights from psychological and ethical theories provides a deeper understanding of the
behaviours of individual group members and how the dynamics of groups can be optimized for
the best possible results. Utilizing psychological and ethical theories regarding group interactions
gives us various understandings about altering individual behaviours and group mechanisms to
better the outcomes among groups in aggregation. Such an approach encourages a purposeful
viewpoint on how theory can be practically applied to improve the performance and harmony of
the group. An analysis like this one not only identifies possible ways to enhance group
performance but also accents the significance of coordinating individual actions with common
targets to achieve high results in joint endeavours.
The first situation relates to a group project on marketing in a university class, which
arises from difficulties in work distribution and forming effective communication within the
team. That scenario will be examined through the lens of utilitarianism and social identity theory,
which helped me understand the lecture topics of “Meaning and Motivation at Work” and
“Ethics at Work.” These theories provide the ethical considerations and group identity issues
that strongly influence team dynamics and project outcomes. The second situation describes my
role as a project coordinator in a volunteer initiative at a local community centre. While this
setting presented unique challenges in managing time and role distribution among volunteers, it
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
3
undoubtedly influenced the kids' quality of education and recreation activities. Utilitarianism
and Social Identity Theory are used to determine how the choice of ethical behaviours affects
group tightness and project success; finally, an analysis is also made of the motivational factors
and ethical conduct within volunteer-driven activities.
Situation 1: Group Project in a University Marketing Course
a. Account of the Situation
During my final year at university, I teamed up to be part of a year-long small group
project in a marketing class about creating a marketing strategy intended for a local small
business. The group comprises five members: I am the group leader. The others have different
backgrounds, degrees of commitment, and experience in marketing. The aim was to develop and
present a commercially applicable marketing plan that the business would implement to enhance
its customer base and market visibility. We were tasked with conducting market research,
conducting a competitor analysis, and creating a promotion strategy catering to the business's
specific goals and resources.
In the course of the project, we encountered some obstacles. Firstly, the workload was
distributed unevenly. Only two members, including me, did most of the work, while the others
contributed a little. This created a situation of high tension and disgruntlement among the team
members as the completion deadlines approached and the pressure built up amongst them. The
other problem was communication. Meetings were often found inadequate due to poor
preparation of some members, mainly when some decisions were influenced against the will of
the entire community, thus making them resistant and inefficient. I chose this situation for
analysis as it depicted the team's problems concerning motivation and ethics, which I didn't
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
4
expect and had never occurred to me before. It is the challenge of team management and
dynamics that I had to experience for the first time in my life.
b. Application of Theory: Utilitarianism and Social Identity Theory
Utilitarianism Theory Application
Utilitarianism, which helps to achieve the greatest good for the most significant number
of people, can be used to analyse the ethical issues that arise within a group. It makes us believe
that an action is right if it brings happiness or pleasure to people and is wrong if it causes sadness
and pain to others (Körner and Deutsch, 2022; Little, 2002). The principle of utilitarians would
speak for a more equitable task-sharing among group members in our project. Through such a
measure, the fair workload distribution will be achieved, enhancing their general satisfaction
with the group and improving the quality of the result. It has not happened, and a situation is
formed where the happiness and well-being of the group are almost ruined by some members'
actions (or inactions). The utilitarianism principle enables us to recognise that our team's failure
to assign tasks equally led to more significant stress and dissatisfaction for the more active
members, which could have been prevented by a more utilitarian approach to task distribution
and responsibility sharing (Quiambao, 2022).
Social Identity Theory Application
Social Identity Theory, which is a proposition that who a person is depends on the
groups they belong to, can also be another lens to view the dynamics within our group. This
notion can be utilised to make sense of the incoherent dyadic relations and ensuing conflicts
between the group members (Harwood, 2020). In addition to the social identity theory, it is
indisputably true that group members seek to improve their status and image to improve their
self-esteem (Steffens et al., 2020). However, what might cause problems within the group, such
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
5
as some members feeling overburdened? In contrast, others are considered underperforming,
which can lead to conflict within the group and the collapse of group identity (Spears, 2020). Our
group was the best example of that. The inequality did not bother us; it separated us, and our
group spirit went down. Moreover, the Social Identity Theory can spotlight the critical role of
better group cohesion that comes with a greater sense of belonging and commitment to the group
purpose. Encouraging a culture where each member felt equally responsible and necessary must
have reduced the issues of different and low levels of participation and motivation (Crocetti et
al., 2022).
Developed Understanding
Demonstrating the theories helped me explore more in-depth why and how our team
encountered critical issues. Utilitarianism highlighted the consequences of skewed effort, the
prominent role in group cohesion, and the project's success. The theory of Social Identity
differed from that of Social Identity in that it focused on the social dynamics and the identity
issues within the group that shaped individual and group behaviour. Thus, this analysis does not
only help to understand the team's experiences and serves as a guide for dealing with similar
issues in future collaborative settings.
Situation 2: Volunteer Project Coordination at a Local Community Centre
a. Account of the Situation
In the previous year, I had the opportunity to spearhead a project within the volunteer
initiative of a community centre; the mission was to conduct weekly sessions and activities for
children from low-income backgrounds. The project brought a small team of ten volunteers,
mixed in age and professional background, though they were all characterized by dedication to
the local community. My primary function was to create and introduce a mix of interactive and
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
6
academic activities that were captivating and promoted healthy cognitive development for the
children. This came with much planning, resource allocation, and ongoing adjustments based on
what the session told us about the feedback and participation levels we observed.
Different ideas on the best ways to undertake specific functions led to challenges. Some
volunteers value more structured and curriculum-centred approaches, believing in the advantages
such approaches bring to the educational side. In contrast, other volunteers stress the importance
of a more relaxed, play-based learning environment with room for children’s interests and
natural interactions. An issue was the manner of making decisions. The process initially started
democratically, and the disagreements came up slowly. Later on, the older volunteers started
getting more power, and they ignored the suggestions of younger volunteers. Thus, they became
an increasingly unhappy team, most of whom claimed their advice was not appreciated. The
analysis of this situation was chosen for its uniqueness, which includes that apart from the aspect
of decision-making and personal satisfaction, motivation factors are always considered, which is
not the case in paid position settings.
b. Application of Theory: Utilitarianism and Social Identity Theory
Utilitarianism Theory Application
Applying Utilitarianism to the said volunteering setting specifically examines how
decisions and actions affected the total enjoyment and results for the volunteers and those served
as children. According to utilitarian ethics, actions that bring maximum happiness for all
stakeholders are the most appropriate. The command chain procedure, designed to simplify
functions and replace group debates, is not promised to always be in the best interest of all
people involved. Some volunteers were disheartened, which may have lowered the quality of
their engagement and interactions with kids, which was a foil to the overall effectiveness of the
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
7
workshops. The utilitarian approach can be described as a process that would incorporate all the
views of volunteers and their expertise in the decision-making process. Perhaps the result could
be more exciting and valuable activities for the children that might address their needs.
Social Identity Theory Application
Social Identity Theory can be used to study the factors that unite or divide teams within
the volunteer group. According to the theory, members take their self-esteem from their group
and are interested in discriminating between their groups and others (Scheepers and Ellemers,
2019). There was a distinction between senior and new members of our volunteer team, which
led to in-group and out-group dynamics where even newer volunteers may have felt less valued
for the cause and failed to identify with its goals. This division may have been somewhat
overcome by creating a more general superior identity that would have held the common purpose
of helping the children and their families. Enhancing equal participation in decisions and
accepting their equality could have resulted in a stronger sense of solidarity and performance.
Developed Understanding
Combining these theories with the volunteer project scenario provides a deeper
understanding of how the ethical and moral issues associated with managing a team with diverse
understanding and backgrounds may arise. Utilitarianism draws attention to the fact that
decision-making should put the overall happiness and effectiveness of people first, and,
therefore, instead of being exclusive, efforts need to be made to ensure that volunteers
experience higher satisfaction and that children also benefit. Social Identity Theory emphasizes
how group dynamics affect and enhance volunteerism and how robust and inclusive group
identity is critical for the success of volunteer projects.
Findings and Reflections
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
8
Key Understandings from Theory Application
Applying the theories of Utilitarianism and Social Identity provided a great deal of
structure to analysing group dynamics in an interpersonal plan in a university project and a
volunteer effort. Such hypotheses provided clues about the interaction between the decision, the
group efficacy, and the level of individual morale. Utilitarianism enabled you to examine how
intra-group decisions supported the group's well-being and its effectiveness in collectively
functioning. In the university project, the most striking and useful idea for me was that the
uneven distribution of the work among group members affected the group morale and success of
the project, and that may have led to better results if the distribution had been fair and
balanced. However, the volunteer scenario illustrated that even a robust centralised decisionmaking process that may be efficient does not necessarily produce outcomes that are in the best
interests of all parties involved, particularly volunteers' engagement and
satisfaction. Utilitarianism comes with the benefit of having outcome as the focus, which makes
it a suitable guide in decision-making as it uses overall happiness as the metric (Marseille and
Kahn, 2019; Tseng and Wang, 2021). Nevertheless, it is apparent in complex group settings
where it is hard to balance individual members' satisfaction with a group's collective outcome
(Häyry, 2020).
Social Identity Theory provided a theoretical framework illustrating the importance of
group identity in terms of group cohesion and individual drive. Both cases discussed the identity
dynamic that influences team performance and personal happiness through group functioning
and group members' interactions. The theory's power lies in its capability to explain the social
mechanisms of group behaviour as interconnected with the personal alignment of these goals,
which is the basis of teamwork (Almuqrin and Mutambik, 2021). However, the challenge is that
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
9
it is impossible to directly manipulate the social identity where outcomes are not clearly defined
since changes in group dynamics can be complicated to observe or even slower to occur (Collins
et al., 2021).
Reflection on Theoretical Assumptions and Personal Learning
The theories advocate that the behaviours of individuals are subject to the influence of
their groups and the anticipated outcomes. My experiences proved these suppositions correct;
behaviours depended largely on group dynamics and fairness perceptions. Nevertheless, these
explanations disregard the fact that feelings and irrationality are also key players in the
competitive market. These outcomes taught me that equity in work distribution, including all
stakeholders in the decision-making process, is imperative. The practical idea of maximizing
benefits for the largest population will be my starting point in seeking equitable
solutions. Knowledge acquired from Social Identity Theory will allow me to formulate a
thriving and non-discriminatory group identity, boosting members' motivation and unity.
Future Improvements in Working with Others
In future group work, I will develop a system of open communication and equitable
participation to make all members feel that their contributions are taken seriously. This will
positively influence decision-making by expanding its horizons by including different
opinions. Additionally, I will invest in creating a positive group identity that is more proactive in
the team's goals in search of both individual satisfaction and the team's effectiveness. These
methods will create an environment of cooperation and productivity consistent with a context
informed by such understandings.
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
10
Reference List
Almuqrin, A. and Mutambik, I. (2021). The explanatory power of social cognitive theory in
determining knowledge sharing among Saudi faculty. PLOS ONE, 16(3), p.e0248275.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248275.
Collins, P.H., da Silva, E.C.G., Ergun, E., Furseth, I., Bond, K.D. and Martínez-Palacios, J.
(2021). Intersectionality as Critical Social Theory. Contemporary Political Theory,
[online] 20(3), pp.690–725. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00490-0.
Crocetti, E., Albarello, F., Meeus, W. and Rubini, M. (2022). Identities: A developmental socialpsychological perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), pp.1–41. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2104987.
Harwood, J. (2020). Social Identity Theory. The International Encyclopedia of Media
Psychology, [online] 1(1), pp.1–7. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0153.
Häyry, M. (2020). Just better utilitarianism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30(2),
pp.1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180120000882.
Körner, A. and Deutsch, R. (2022). Deontology and utilitarianism in real life: A set of moral
dilemmas based on historic events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, [online]
49(10), p.014616722211030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221103058.
Little, I.M.D. (2002). Utilitarianism: Theory and Applications. Ethics, Economics, and Politics,
pp.39–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199257043.003.0005.
Marseille, E. and Kahn, J.G. (2019). Utilitarianism and the Ethical Foundations of costeffectiveness Analysis in Resource Allocation for Global Health. Philosophy, Ethics, and
Humanities in Medicine, 14(1), pp.1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-019-0074-7.
Introduction to Behaviour at Work
11
Quiambao, J.E.A. (2022). Thinking ethically: The utilitarianism approach in moral decision
making. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation,
pp.602–604. doi: https://doi.org/10.54660/anfo.2022.3.3.30.
Scheepers, D. and Ellemers, N. (2019). Social Identity Theory. Social Psychology in Action,
[online] 1(1), pp.129–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_9.
Spears, R. (2020). Social Influence and Group Identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1). doi:
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-070620-111818.
Steffens, N.K., Munt, K.A., van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M.J. and Haslam, S.A. (2020).
Advancing the social identity theory of leadership: A meta-analytic review of leader
group prototypicality. Organizational Psychology Review, [online] 11(1),
p.204138662096256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386620962569.
Tseng, P.-E. and Wang, Y.-H. (2021). Deontological or Utilitarian? an Eternal Ethical Dilemma in
Outbreak. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16),
pp.1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168565.