Instructor’s Name: Nikko C. Clar Sem/Term: 2nd/1st CN:___________ Student’s Name: BOBBY BLITZ D. ALABE Date:MAY/27/2022 Score:____________ Course & Year: BSED MATHEMATICS 1 Room & Time _______________________ Permit No.:_________________ DISCUSSION: As a teacher, respond to the following situations using THREE different theories that we learned in the class. Each answer must have academic references. (30 points each) 1. Your learner was not able to go to school for one week. He was an active learner up until what happened. As a responsible teacher, you went to their house and realized that the learner had no travelling expenses due to his father’s loss of livelihood due to the pandemic. BIOECOLOGICAL LEARNING THEORY - Bronfenbrenner's work was very important in understanding a systematic approach of human and social development. His theory is important for teachers to understand because it allows the educator to build fundamental relationships with their students and create a communication rich classroom that involves the parents. Swick, K. J., & Williams, R. D. (2006). An analysis of Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological perspective for early childhood educators: Implications for working with families experiencing stress. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(5), 371–378.Google Scholar 2. Pearly Mae is a star student. But you realized that she has problem with learning in subjects that concerns bodily-kinesthetic activities. What are the best ways to address this? BRUNER’S COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT LEARNING THEORY When we examined student responses to questions about the direction of the static friction force in various situations, we both had strong ideas about how to write a tutorial to promote deeper understanding. But our ideas were quite different. In this theoretical paper, we present the two contrasting tutorials and show how their differences can be traced to different theoretical orientations toward cognition and learning. We do not claim that one tutorial--or the theoretical framework loosely associated with it--is superior. Instead, we hope to illustrate two claims. One, we show in detail how curriculum designers' cognitive "theories" (frameworks), even if largely tacit during the act of creation, shape the resulting tutorials. Two, we show how, at least for us, articulating and discussing our respective theoretical orientations and their influence on our tutorial writing enables a rethinking of long-standing tutorial-writing habits. We argue that instructional intuition--shaped by explicit and tacit theoretical assumptions--functions well in guiding the design of curriculum, as our contrasting tutorials illustrate; but more systematic attention to the underlying theoretical assumptions can productively inform refinements. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=bruners+cognitive+development+theory&id=EJ1283357 3. You found out that your co-teacher physically punishes her learners every time they don’t get perfect marks in her subject. Is this justifiable? PIAGET’S COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT LEARNING THEORY The cognitive development that occurs during this period takes place over a relatively short time and involves a great deal of growth. Children not only learn how to perform physical actions such as crawling and walking; they also learn a great deal about language from the people with whom they interact. Piaget also broke this stage down into substages. Early representational thought emerges during the final part of the sensorimotor stage. https://www.verywellmind.com/piagets-stages-of-cognitive-development-2795457 What punishments must a student receive for cheating in a VERY EASY examination? They may receive a failing grade on the assignment or even the entire class. They may have to repeat the class over the summer or even the following year. Some may lose their privileges to play sports or spend time doing other after-school activities. REFERENCES: https://education.seattlepi.com/effects-students-caught-cheating-college1219.html Inside Higher Ed: Cheating in College Educational Testing Service/Ad Council Campaign to Discourage Cheating: Cheating Is a Personal Foul Stanford University: Academic Cheating Fact Sheet Georgia State University: Policy on Academic Honesty