TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER ONE
3
1.0 INTRODUCTION
3
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
3
1.1
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
5
1.2
JUSTIFICATION OF STUDY
5
1.3
AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
7
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
7
1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
8
1.6 RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
9
1.7 SCOPE OF STUDY
9
1.8 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
10
CHAPTER TWO
12
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
12
2.1 SEARCH STRATEGY
12
2.2 EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK
14
2.2.1 Concept and Importance of Health Insurance
14
2.2.1.1 Concept of Health Insurance
14
2.2.1.2 Importance of Health Insurance
15
2.2.1.2.1 Financial Protection
15
2.2.1.2.2 Access to Healthcare
15
2.2.1.2.3 Preventive Care
15
2.2.1.2.4 Reduced Healthcare Disparities
15
2.2.1.2.5 Financial Stability
16
2.2.1.3 Health Care Financing Reforms
16
2.2.3.1.1 Social Health Insurance Model
18
2.2.3.1.2 Tax-Based Health Insurance Model
18
2.2.3.1.3 Private Health Insurance Model
19
2.2.3.1.4 National Health Insurance (NHI)
20
2.2.3.1.5 Out-of-Pocket Model
21
2.2.3 Healthcare Reform Process in Nigeria
21
2.2.4 Factors Influencing Knowledge and Utilization of Health Insurance
24
2.2.4.1 Socioeconomic Status
24
2.2.4.2 Health Literacy
24
2.2.4.3 Perceived Need for Health Insurance
24
2.2.4.4. Awareness and Information Accessibility
25
2.2.4.5 Cultural and Social Norms
25
2.2.4.6 Trust in the Healthcare System
25
2.2.4.7 Policy and Regulatory Environment
26
2.2.4.8 Geographical Accessibility and Infrastructure
26
2.2.5 Strategies to Improve HealthCare Financing in Nigeria
26
2.2.5.1 Increase Government Spending on Healthcare
26
2.2.5.2 Strengthen Healthcare Infrastructure
27
2.2.5.3 Expand Health Insurance Coverage
27
2.2.5.4 Promote Community-Based Health Financing
28
2.2.5.5 Enhance Revenue Generation in the Healthcare Sector
28
2.2.5.6 Improve Healthcare Efficiency and Accountability
29
2.2.5.7 Invest in Health Information Systems
29
2.2.5.8 Address Health Workforce Challenges
30
2.5 Conceptual Framework
31
2.5.1 Walt and Gilson Model
31
CHAPTER THREE
33
3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
33
3.1 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION
33
3.2 ADVOCACY/COMMUNITY ENTRY
34
3.3 STUDY POPULATION
35
3.4 STUDY DESIGN
35
3.5 INCLUSION CRITERIA
36
3.6 EXCLUSION CRITERIA
36
3.6 Sample Size Determination
36
3.7 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
37
3.8 RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS- VALIDITY, PRETESTING, PILOT STUDY
37
3.9 METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
38
3.10 MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES AND DATA PROCESSING
38
3.11 METHODS OF DATA MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS
38
3.12 CONSENT/METHODS OF PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS
39
3.13 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
39
3.14 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
39
RERFERENCES
40
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY
The global movement towards achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC) is gaining
momentum, and health insurance plays a pivotal role in this endeavor. In health insurance systems
employing a prepaid mechanism, it facilitates the pooling of risks and redistribution of financial
resources to provide financial protection against healthcare expenses (Uguru et al., 2020). Many
countries worldwide have embraced the concept of UHC through the implementation of social
health insurance (SHI). SHI holds significant potential for enhancing financial protection by
reducing out-of-pocket payments and fostering greater utilization of healthcare services among
insured individuals, thereby promoting social equity in healthcare access (Uguru et al., 2020).
In countries with robust healthcare systems, insured citizens experience improved health outcomes
due to timely access to healthcare services, resulting in reduced financial burdens (Nobles et al.,
2019). Several nations such as Germany, the United Kingdom, South Korea, and Thailand have
successfully achieved full coverage of their populations through effective health insurance
systems. However, low and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Nigeria have been less inclined
to adopt this approach, often relying on general revenues and direct out-of-pocket payments for
healthcare expenses. Even in countries where health insurance has been implemented, the
performance of the scheme often falls short of expectations, leading to inefficient resource
allocation and diminished trust among enrolled members (Nobles et al., 2019). Health insurance
can be categorized into two main types: Private Health Insurance and Social (National) Health
Insurance (Elias et al., 2019). The National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) is a statutory body
established under the NHIS Act 35 of 1999, with the aim of enhancing the health of all Nigerians
at an affordable cost to both the government and citizens. The NHIS offers various benefits to
willing participants and stakeholders, including outpatient care, provision of drugs listed in the
scheme's essential drug list, specified diagnostic tests, preventive healthcare services such as
immunization, antenatal and postnatal care, and hospitalization for up to 15 days, among others. It
serves to provide economic security to workers in the event of accidents, old age, sickness, or
premature death of family wage earners (Elias et al., 2019).
According to NHIS Decree No. 35 of 1999, the overarching objective of the scheme is to ensure
the provision of health insurance that maximizes cost-effective and high-quality health services
for the insured individual and their beneficiaries (NHIS, 2020). Specific objectives outlined
include preventing excessive medical expenses, curbing arbitrary increases in healthcare costs,
maintaining a steady flow of funds for effective scheme operation and healthcare programs,
promoting equitable distribution of healthcare costs across income levels, achieving universal
healthcare provision in Nigeria, and fostering increased private sector involvement in the country's
healthcare services (NHIS, 2020).
1.1 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Despite the existence of health insurance schemes aimed at improving access to healthcare services
and providing financial protection against medical expenses, there appears to be a gap in
understanding the level of awareness and utilization of these schemes among residents of Ilorin
Metropolis, Kwara State. While health insurance is recognized as a critical component of achieving
Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and ensuring equitable access to healthcare, factors such as
lack of knowledge about available schemes, misconceptions about eligibility criteria, affordability
concerns, and limited accessibility to insurance services may hinder residents from actively
participating in these programs. Furthermore, variations in socioeconomic status, educational
background, and cultural beliefs within the community may influence individuals' perceptions and
utilization patterns of health insurance (NHIS, 2020).
Thus, there is a need to investigate the extent of residents' knowledge about health insurance
schemes, including their understanding of coverage benefits, enrollment processes, and eligibility
requirements. Additionally, exploring the factors that influence residents' decisions to enroll or
refrain from participating in health insurance programs, as well as assessing the barriers and
facilitators to utilization, is crucial for identifying strategies to enhance the uptake of health
insurance among residents of Ilorin Metropolis. Understanding these dynamics can inform policy
interventions and targeted educational initiatives aimed at improving access to healthcare and
promoting financial risk protection in the community (NHIS, 2020).
1.2 JUSTIFICATION OF STUDY
The investigation into the knowledge and utilization of health insurance schemes among residents
of Ilorin Metropolis, Kwara State, is paramount for various critical reasons. Firstly, it serves as a
fundamental gauge to assess the overall accessibility of healthcare services within the community.
By delving into awareness levels regarding available health insurance options and actual
enrollment rates, the study can shed light on potential barriers hindering healthcare access. These
insights are instrumental in identifying disparities in access among different demographic groups,
thereby facilitating targeted interventions to ensure equitable healthcare access for all residents,
irrespective of socioeconomic status or background (Anetoh et al., 2017).
Moreover, the study's findings carry significant implications for financial protection against
healthcare costs (Anetoh et al., 2017). As health insurance plays a pivotal role in mitigating the
financial burden associated with medical expenses, an examination of knowledge and utilization
levels can provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of existing mechanisms in providing this
crucial financial safety net. By identifying gaps in coverage and areas where financial protection
is lacking, policymakers can tailor strategies to enhance the affordability and accessibility of
healthcare services for vulnerable populations, ultimately improving overall health outcomes and
reducing disparities in health access and outcomes (Uguru et al., 2022). Furthermore,
understanding the relationship between health insurance knowledge/utilization and health
outcomes is essential for establishing evidence-based approaches to healthcare delivery and policy
formulation. Individuals with adequate health insurance coverage are more likely to seek timely
medical care, adhere to treatment plans, and access preventive services, all of which contribute to
improved health outcomes and overall well-being. By elucidating these associations, the study can
provide empirical evidence supporting the importance of health insurance in promoting better
health outcomes and inform the development of targeted interventions to address specific health
needs and challenges within the community (Uguru et al., 2022).
Lastly, the study's insights have significant implications for policy formulation and decisionmaking in healthcare financing and delivery. By identifying factors influencing knowledge and
utilization of health insurance schemes, policymakers can develop tailored strategies to enhance
awareness, expand coverage, and improve the effectiveness of existing schemes. These evidencebased policies can help address systemic issues, optimize resource allocation, and ensure the
provision of high-quality, affordable healthcare services to all residents. In essence, the study
serves as a crucial foundation for informed decision-making and policy development aimed at
improving healthcare access, affordability, and outcomes in Ilorin Metropolis and beyond (Uguru
et al., 2022).
1.3 AIM AND OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
The aim of this research was to assess the knowledge and utilization of health insurance scheme
among residents of Ilorin Metropolis, Kwara State.
1.4 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
To achieve this aim, the following will be done:
1. To assess the level of awareness and understanding of different health insurance schemes
available within the community, including both private and government-sponsored
options;
2. To determine the extent of enrollment and utilization of health insurance among residents,
examining factors influencing enrollment decisions and barriers to utilization;
3. To explore the demographic and socioeconomic determinants of health insurance
knowledge, enrollment, and utilization, including factors such as age, gender, education
level, income, and employment status;
4. To investigate the perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of residents regarding health
insurance, including perceived benefits, concerns, and satisfaction with coverage and
services;
5. To identify key challenges and gaps in the current health insurance system, including issues
related to affordability, accessibility, coverage limitations, and quality of services;
6. To provide recommendations for policymakers, healthcare providers, and stakeholders to
improve awareness, enrollment, and utilization of health insurance schemes, with the aim
of enhancing healthcare access, affordability, and quality of care for residents of Ilorin
Metropolis.
1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What is the level of awareness and understanding of different health insurance schemes
among residents of Ilorin Metropolis?
2. What are the factors influencing residents' decisions to enroll in health insurance
schemes?
3. What are the main barriers preventing residents from enrolling in or utilizing health
insurance?
4. How does demographic and socioeconomic factors such as age, gender, education level,
income, and employment status influence knowledge, enrollment, and utilization of
health insurance?
5. What are the perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of residents regarding health
insurance, including perceived benefits, concerns, and satisfaction with coverage and
services?
6. How does knowledge, enrollment, and utilization of health insurance impact residents'
healthcare-seeking behavior, access to healthcare services, and financial protection
against healthcare costs?
7. What are the key challenges and gaps in the current health insurance system in Ilorin
Metropolis?
8. What recommendations can be made to policymakers, healthcare providers, and
stakeholders to improve awareness, enrollment, and utilization of health insurance
schemes, and enhance healthcare access and affordability for residents?
1.6 RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
Null hypothesis (H0);
 There is no significant association between demographic and socioeconomic factors (such as
age, gender, education level, income, and employment status) and the knowledge, enrollment,
and utilization of health insurance schemes among residents of Ilorin Metropolis
Alternative hypothesis (H1);
 There is significant association between demographic and socioeconomic factors (such as age,
gender, education level, income, and employment status) and the knowledge, enrollment, and
utilization of health insurance schemes among residents of Ilorin Metropolis
1.7 SCOPE OF STUDY
The scope of the study on the knowledge and utilization of health insurance schemes among
residents of Ilorin Metropolis, Kwara State, encompasses several key aspects. Firstly, the
geographical scope focuses specifically on Ilorin Metropolis within Kwara State, Nigeria,
considering the unique characteristics and dynamics of this urban area. Secondly, the study targets
residents of Ilorin Metropolis across various demographic groups, including individuals of
different ages, genders, education levels, income brackets, and employment statuses. Thirdly, the
scope extends to both private and government-sponsored health insurance schemes available
within the community, aiming to assess awareness, enrollment rates, and utilization patterns across
different types of insurance programs. Additionally, the study explores the factors influencing
residents' decisions regarding health insurance enrollment and utilization, including barriers and
facilitators encountered in accessing and utilizing health insurance services. Furthermore, the
scope encompasses an examination of the perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of residents
regarding health insurance, shedding light on perceived benefits, concerns, and satisfaction levels
with coverage and services. Finally, the study will provide recommendations for policymakers,
healthcare providers, and stakeholders to improve awareness, enrollment, and utilization of health
insurance schemes, with the ultimate goal of enhancing healthcare access, affordability, and
quality of care for residents of Ilorin Metropolis.
1.8 OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
1. Health Insurance Scheme: Refers to a structured program that provides financial
coverage for medical and healthcare expenses incurred by individuals. In this study, health
insurance schemes include both private and government-sponsored insurance programs
aimed at facilitating access to healthcare services.
2. Knowledge: Refers to the understanding and awareness of health insurance concepts,
coverage options, enrollment procedures, benefits, and associated terms among residents
of Ilorin Metropolis. Knowledge may be assessed through surveys, interviews, or tests
measuring respondents' comprehension of health insurance-related information.
3. Utilization: Refers to the actual use of health insurance benefits and services by individuals
enrolled in health insurance schemes. Utilization may include accessing medical care,
diagnostic tests, medications, preventive services, and hospitalization covered under the
health insurance plan.
4. Residents: Refers to individuals who reside or live within the geographical boundaries of
Ilorin Metropolis, Kwara State. Residents may include permanent residents, temporary
residents, and individuals who spend a significant amount of time within the study area.
5. Awareness: Refers to the level of consciousness or familiarity with the existence and
availability of health insurance schemes among residents of Ilorin Metropolis. Awareness
may be measured through questions assessing respondents' knowledge of health insurance
options and sources of information about health insurance.
6. Enrollment: Refers to the process of officially registering or signing up for a health
insurance scheme. Enrollment involves providing personal information, choosing a
coverage plan, and agreeing to the terms and conditions of the insurance program.
7. Socioeconomic Factors: Refers to demographic and economic characteristics that may
influence individuals' access to and utilization of health insurance, including age, gender,
education level, income, employment status, household size, and marital status.
8. Barriers: Refers to obstacles or challenges that hinder individuals from enrolling in or
utilizing health insurance schemes effectively. Barriers may include affordability issues,
lack of awareness, administrative complexities, cultural beliefs, language barriers, and
geographic accessibility constraints.
9. Perceptions: Refers to individuals' subjective beliefs, attitudes, and opinions regarding
health insurance, including perceived benefits, risks, value, trustworthiness, and
satisfaction with coverage and services.
10. Satisfaction: Refers to individuals' overall contentment or fulfillment with their health
insurance coverage, services, and experiences. Satisfaction may be assessed through
surveys, interviews, or ratings of specific aspects of health insurance plans, such as
customer service, provider networks, and claim processing
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 SEARCH STRATEGY
In conducting a comprehensive assessment of the knowledge and utilization of health insurance
schemes among residents of Ilorin Metropolis, Kwara State, a systematic review of relevant
literature was undertaken. This meticulous search strategy involved accessing various academic
databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, as well as reputable repositories such as African
Index Medicus and Global. Utilizing specific key terms such as 'health insurance,' 'knowledge,'
'utilization,' 'residents,' 'Ilorin Metropolis,' and 'Kwara State' ensured a thorough examination of
available literature pertaining to the research topic. This rigorous search process was carried out
over a specified timeframe, allowing for the inclusion of recent and pertinent studies within the
field. The screening of identified literature adhered to a rigorous methodology, overseen by two
independent reviewers designated as Reviewer 1 (initials) and Reviewer 2 (initials). These
reviewers followed predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, carefully scrutinizing abstracts
and titles of potential papers to ascertain their relevance to the research topic. Subsequently, fulltext articles meeting the initial screening criteria underwent a detailed evaluation by the same
reviewers to determine their suitability for qualitative and quantitative analyses. This robust
methodology was adopted to ensure the inclusion of high-quality studies that specifically address
the knowledge and utilization of health insurance schemes among residents of Ilorin Metropolis,
Kwara State. By adhering to this systematic approach, the study aims to compile a comprehensive
body of literature that will provide valuable insights into the factors influencing awareness,
enrollment, and usage of health insurance among residents in the specified geographical setting.
The following sub-headings were thoroughly examined:
Empirical framework
Theoretical framework
Conceptual framework
2.2 EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK
2.2.1 Concept and Importance of Health Insurance
2.2.1.1 Concept of Health Insurance
Health insurance is a complex financial mechanism that involves the pooling of resources from
individuals or groups to provide coverage for medical expenses (NHIS, 2020). The core concept
revolves around spreading the financial risk of healthcare expenses across a large and diverse
population. Individuals pay premiums into a collective fund, which is then used to cover the
healthcare costs of policyholders who require medical treatment. At its essence, health insurance
operates on the principle of risk-sharing. Healthy individuals contribute premiums to the insurance
pool with the understanding that they may require medical care in the future. By spreading the risk
across a larger group, health insurance aims to protect individuals and families from the potentially
devastating financial consequences of unexpected medical emergencies or chronic health
conditions. Health insurance plans vary widely in terms of coverage, cost, and benefits. They may
cover a range of medical services, including doctor's visits, hospital stays, prescription
medications, preventive care, and specialist consultations. Some plans also offer additional
benefits such as dental, vision, and mental health services (NHIS, 2020).
2.2.1.2 Importance of Health Insurance
2.2.1.2.1 Financial Protection
One of the primary benefits of health insurance is its ability to provide individuals and families
with financial protection against the high costs of medical care. Without insurance, medical
expenses can quickly accumulate and lead to significant financial hardship or even bankruptcy.
Health insurance helps mitigate this risk by covering all or part of the costs associated with
healthcare services, reducing the financial burden on individuals and families (Sule, 2020).
2.2.1.2.2 Access to Healthcare
Health insurance plays a crucial role in facilitating access to healthcare services. Insured
individuals are more likely to seek timely medical care, preventive services, and treatment for
health conditions. Access to healthcare services is essential for maintaining overall health and
well-being, as it allows individuals to receive necessary medical attention, manage chronic
conditions, and prevent the progression of illnesses (Sule, 2020).
2.2.1.2.3 Preventive Care
Many health insurance plans offer coverage for preventive services such as vaccinations,
screenings, and wellness visits. These services are essential for identifying health risks early,
detecting diseases in their early stages, and promoting overall health and well-being. By covering
the cost of preventive care, health insurance encourages individuals to prioritize their health and
take proactive steps to prevent illness and disease (Halder and Sarda, 2021).
2.2.1.2.4 Reduced Healthcare Disparities
Health insurance helps reduce disparities in access to healthcare by providing coverage to
individuals across different socioeconomic backgrounds. Without insurance, individuals from
underserved communities may struggle to afford medical care, leading to disparities in health
outcomes. Health insurance ensures that all individuals have access to the same quality of care,
regardless of their income, race, ethnicity, or social status, thereby promoting health equity and
reducing healthcare disparities (Halder and Sarda, 2021).
2.2.1.2.5 Financial Stability
Health insurance contributes to overall financial stability by protecting individuals and families
from the financial strain of medical expenses. Medical bills can quickly accumulate and lead to
financial hardship, especially for individuals without insurance. Health insurance allows
individuals to budget for healthcare costs more effectively, reducing the risk of medical debt,
bankruptcy, and poverty resulting from healthcare-related expenses (Manida et al., 2021).
2.2.1.3 Health Care Financing Reforms
Healthcare financing reform aims to enhance the quality of care, improve health outcomes, ensure
equity in access, and contain costs within healthcare systems (Cuadrado et al., 2019). The core
functions of healthcare systems, as identified by the World Health Organization (WHO), include
stewardship, resource generation, service provision, and financing (Cuadrado et al., 2019). Across
different countries, healthcare reforms have been undertaken at various times to achieve these
functions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in Africa, the need for
healthcare reform became apparent in the 1980s due to Structural Adjustment Programs (SAPs),
which required cuts in social spending. One crucial aspect of healthcare reform has been financing
reform, which involves considering mechanisms such as prepayment and risk-pooling to ensure
the success of overall reform efforts (Cuadrado et al., 2019).
Healthcare financing refers to the mechanisms used to raise funds for activities in the health sector,
including taxes, insurance, and direct payments by patients. Cuadrado et al. (2019) define it as the
collection of funds from various sources, pooling them to share financial risk across larger
population groups, and using them to pay for services from public and private healthcare providers.
Essentially, health financing reform involves strategies for sourcing and allocating funds for the
healthcare sector. Moreover, the nature of health financing in a country influences the quality of
care and the behavior of stakeholders within the healthcare system (Cuadrado et al., 2019).
There are various models of healthcare financing reform aimed at achieving the objectives of
healthcare systems. These models differ in how benefits are assigned, how providers are organized,
and how services are purchased and paid for (Batalden, 2018). While numerous models exist,
historically, the main models of healthcare financing reforms across countries include social health
insurance, tax-based health insurance, private health insurance, national health insurance, and the
out-of-pocket model (Batalden, 2018). These models are further categorized as private
mechanisms (private insurance and direct out-of-pocket payments) and public mechanisms (tax
funding, national, and social health insurance) (Beattie et al., 2016; WHO 2019). The
implementation of these models may vary from one country to another, depending on each
country's context (Beattie et al., 2016; WHO 2019). In some cases, features from different models
are combined to create a new desired model. For example, Thailand combines features of different
models by financing healthcare for the formal sector through statutory health insurance and
covering the informal sector through general taxation (Witter et al., 2017). Additionally, the design
of prepayment systems and pooling arrangements plays a crucial role in determining the
redistributive capacity of funds and supporting access to needed services with financial protection.
Overall, healthcare financing reform is essential for achieving universal health coverage and
ensuring equitable access to healthcare services across diverse populations (Mathauer et al., 2019).
2.2.3.1.1 Social Health Insurance Model
The Social Health Insurance System (SHI) originated in Germany in 1883 under Otto von
Bismarck's initiative to provide healthcare services to citizens through insurance contributions copaid by employers and employees based on payroll deductions (Batalden, 2018). Initially, the
system targeted specific employee groups such as those in railways, power plants, and shipyards,
gradually extending coverage to the entire population. Enrollment in SHI is typically mandatory
and linked to employment status (Batalden, 2018). In the SHI model, the government acts as a
regulator and provides healthcare coverage for those not in formal employment, homeless
individuals, and immigrants through general revenues (Gaeta et al., 2017). The core principles of
SHI systems include plurality, liberty, and solidarity, allowing users to choose providers and
granting providers some degree of autonomy (Fredriksson et al., 2018).
Supporters of the SHI model argue that it offers users a wide range of providers and choices,
promotes financial sustainability through compulsory pooling, and redistributes resources
effectively among participants (Mathauer et al., 2019). However, critics highlight challenges such
as cost control issues, selective purchasing, and the risk of widening disparities in access to care,
especially in economies with large informal sectors (Mathauer et al., 2019). Recent reforms in
countries like Germany have introduced user fees and co-payments, albeit with exemptions for
vulnerable groups, to address cost-sharing challenges. Despite its advantages, the SHI model may
exclude individuals in the informal sector and contribute to disparities in access to healthcare,
particularly in LMICs (Mathauer et al., 2019).
2.2.3.1.2 Tax-Based Health Insurance Model
The tax-based health insurance model, also known as the Beveridge model, originated in the
United Kingdom and involves the government directly providing and financing healthcare services
from general tax revenues (Batalden, 2018). Named after William Beveridge, who advocated for
social protection reforms, this model aims to ensure universal coverage without regard to
employment status (Gaeta et al., 2017). Under the Beveridge model, the government plays a central
role in regulating and financing healthcare, with healthcare services provided by public facilities
(Batalden, 2018). The principles of universality and plurality guide this model, ensuring equitable
access to healthcare for all citizens (Fredriksson et al., 2018).
Proponents of the tax-based model highlight its equitable access, progressive financing based on
income, and reliance on general taxation to fund healthcare services (Mathauer et al., 2019).
However, critics argue that it may lead to limited patient choice and long waiting times for services.
Implementing this model effectively in LMICs requires a strong commitment from governments
to raise adequate funds for healthcare (Mathauer et al., 2019).
2.2.3.1.3 Private Health Insurance Model
The Private Health Insurance (PHI) model operates on a profit-oriented basis and is often
associated with the formal sector, offering coverage through multiple insurers competing for
clients (Mathauer et al., 2019). In this model, premiums are determined by insurers based on the
perceived risk level of individuals, and coverage can be obtained from commercial insurance firms,
not-for-profit entities, or voluntary self-employed insurance funds (WHO, 2019).
Key features of the PHI model include private ownership of healthcare inputs, voluntary
participation, competition among insurers, and employer-based or individual purchase options
(Mathauer et al., 2019). While PHI coexists with other models in some countries, it primarily
serves those who can afford it, offering benefits such as access to a wider range of services,
convenience in elective procedures, and risk diversification through private insurers (Mathauer et
al., 2019).
Supporters of the PHI model argue that it provides flexibility and choice for individuals,
encourages competition among providers, and diversifies risk across the insured population.
However, critics raise concerns about adverse selection, where high-risk individuals may be
excluded from coverage, leading to disparities in access and affordability (Mathauer et al., 2019).
While PHI exists in some LMICs, its suitability is questioned due to high levels of poverty and the
potential exclusion of vulnerable populations. Additionally, PHI may conflict with the goals of
universal health coverage (UHC) by prioritizing access for a select portion of the population at the
expense of others (Mathauer et al., 2019).
2.2.3.1.4 National Health Insurance (NHI)
The National Health Insurance (NHI) model, also known as the single-payer system, involves
private healthcare delivery facilitated by a government-run insurance agency that collects funds
and pays bills (Batalden, 2018). In this model, healthcare services are financed from a single
national pool funded by government revenues, and entitlement to services is not contingent on an
individual's ability to contribute financially (Cuadrado et al., 2019).
NHI systems typically offer compulsory or automatic coverage, aiming for universality in
healthcare access, and may employ various pooling arrangements managed by government
agencies or ministries (Mathauer et al., 2019). This model has been implemented in countries like
Canada, Australia, and Turkey, with variations in pooling and purchasing arrangements based on
context and governance structures (Mathauer et al., 2019). Supporters of the NHI model tout its
efficiency, universality, and potential for administrative simplicity, while critics cite challenges
related to cost containment and service delivery bottlenecks. While NHI offers coverage to all
citizens, ensuring its effectiveness in LMICs requires strong government commitment and
sustainable funding mechanisms (Mathauer et al., 2019)
2.2.3.1.5 Out-of-Pocket Model
The Out-of-Pocket (OOP) model entails individuals paying for healthcare services directly at the
point of use, using their own savings or income (Choi et al., 2016). It is characterized by the
absence of organized financing mechanisms, leaving individuals to bear the full burden of
healthcare costs (Batalden, 2018). In this model, individuals may pay for various healthcare
expenses, including doctor visits, medications, and medical supplies, out of their own pockets
(WHO, 2019:3-4). This model is prevalent in countries where there is a lack of structured
healthcare financing systems, leading to individuals having to bear the full cost of their healthcare
needs. It is often associated with limited access to care for those unable to afford out-of-pocket
expenses, exacerbating disparities in healthcare utilization and health outcomes (Deo et al., 2018).
The OOP model has been criticized for its regressive nature, disproportionately burdening lowerincome households and contributing to catastrophic health expenditure. Moreover, reliance on outof-pocket payments can hinder access to essential healthcare services and lead to financial
hardship, particularly for vulnerable populations (Deo et al., 2018). While OOP payments may be
unavoidable in certain contexts, they are generally seen as incompatible with the goal of achieving
universal health coverage (UHC) due to their inequitable nature and adverse effects on financial
risk protection (Cuadrado et al., 2019). Consequently, many countries have sought to transition
away from reliance on OOP payments by implementing prepayment mechanisms and
strengthening health financing systems (Deo et al., 2018).
2.2.3 Healthcare Reform Process in Nigeria
Healthcare reform involves significant changes in policies and institutional arrangements within
the health sector, typically spearheaded by governmental entities (Ananaba et al., 2018).
According to Ananaba et al. (2018), this reform encompasses the identification of priorities, the
refinement of policies, and the restructuring of institutions responsible for policy implementation.
However, the entrenched interests of existing institutions and groups often act as barriers to
change, necessitating substantial political or economic catalysts to initiate reform processes.
Moreover, challenges such as issues related to financial resource control, regulatory capacity, and
coordination can hinder or slow down healthcare reform efforts (Ananaba et al., 2018).
In Nigeria, inadequate coordination among government bodies, development partners, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), coupled with misalignment with national priorities, has been
identified as a key obstacle to effective healthcare reform (Ananaba et al., 2018:). For instance,
Ananaba et al. (2018), reported that a significant portion of external health financing in 2011 was
allocated to sexually transmitted diseases and HIV/AIDS, despite these conditions constituting a
minor percentage of Nigeria's disease burden. This misallocation underscores the need for better
alignment with actual healthcare needs. Additionally, Nigeria's health policies often neglect
alternative healthcare-seeking behaviors, such as traditional or spiritual practices, compromising
equity and coverage principles (Asakitikpi, 2019).
Asakitikpi et al. (2019) suggest that robust health policy reform hinges on several factors,
including the policy context, leadership and governance within the Ministry of Health, stakeholder
involvement, evidence-based decision-making, and efficient resource utilization. They argue that
capacity-building efforts are required across these dimensions to facilitate successful reform.
Typically, healthcare reform in Nigeria is initiated by the Federal Ministry of Health through
stakeholder consensus-building, followed by the establishment of a Technical Working Group
(TWG) comprising representatives from various sectors (Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health,
2016). The TWG assesses past achievements and challenges to inform the development of new
policies (Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health, 2016). The implementation of healthcare reform
often involves the introduction of specific health plans or programs. The national health policy
serves as a foundational document guiding the planning, organization, and management of the
country's health system (Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health, 2016). Subsequent plans, such as the
National Health Sector Reform Programme and the National Strategic Health Development Plan,
operationalize the policy objectives (Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health, 2016). However, poor
coordination among oversight and monitoring bodies, such as the National Council on Health and
development partners, presents a significant challenge to effective reform implementation
((Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health, 2016)). Despite the importance of stakeholder consultation
in policymaking, external influences, particularly from donor agencies and international
organizations, often shape reform agendas (Ichoku and Ifelunini, 2017). Donors tend to prioritize
initiatives that align with their objectives, potentially diverging from the country's policy direction.
This influence extends to the financing and technical support provided by donor agencies, further
complicating Nigeria's reform efforts. Consequently, achieving genuine reform necessitates a
balance between external support and domestic policy autonomy (Ichoku and Ifelunini, 2017).
Furthermore, the involvement of external actors like the United States Agency for International
Development (USAID) and the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development
(DFID) in shaping health financing strategies and policy dimensions underscores the influence of
foreign assistance on Nigeria's healthcare landscape (Ananaba et al., 2018). While ostensibly
providing financial and technical aid, these external actors may inadvertently steer policies toward
their own priorities, potentially undermining Nigeria's autonomy in setting its healthcare agenda.
Historically, Nigeria's health policies and initiatives have been influenced by external
organizations, such as the World Bank, USAID, and UNFPA, contributing to the evolution and
implementation of national health policies (Ananaba et al., 2018). However, this reliance on
external funding often results in fragmented efforts, inefficient resource allocation, and a lack of
coherence with national objectives (Ananaba et al., 2018). Despite the substantial external
assistance, the overall contribution to Nigeria's total health expenditure remains minimal, with
most aid channeled into vertical programs targeting specific diseases (Ananaba et al., 2018).
2.2.4 Factors Influencing Knowledge and Utilization of Health Insurance
2.2.4.1 Socioeconomic Status
Economic factors play a significant role in shaping individuals' knowledge and utilization of health
insurance. People with higher income levels or stable employment are more likely to have access
to health insurance through their employers or the ability to afford private insurance premiums.
Conversely, individuals with lower socioeconomic status may face barriers to accessing health
insurance due to affordability issues or lack of awareness about available programs (WHO, 2020).
2.2.4.2 Health Literacy
Knowledge of health insurance and its benefits is influenced by individuals' health literacy levels.
Health literacy encompasses the ability to understand health information, navigate healthcare
systems, and make informed decisions about one's health. People with higher health literacy are
more likely to comprehend the complexities of health insurance policies, understand coverage
options, and effectively utilize available benefits (WHO, 2019).
2.2.4.3 Perceived Need for Health Insurance
Perception of the importance of health insurance influences individuals' willingness to seek
coverage. Those who perceive themselves as healthy or low-risk may underestimate the necessity
of health insurance, leading to lower uptake rates. Conversely, individuals with pre-existing health
conditions or those who anticipate future healthcare needs are more likely to recognize the value
of health insurance and actively seek coverage (Wang et al., 2017).
2.2.4.4. Awareness and Information Accessibility
Knowledge of health insurance options and benefits depends on the availability of relevant
information and educational resources. Lack of awareness about available insurance programs,
eligibility criteria, enrollment procedures, and coverage details can hinder individuals' ability to
make informed decisions about obtaining health insurance. Therefore, initiatives aimed at
increasing awareness through targeted outreach, community engagement, and educational
campaigns are essential for improving knowledge and utilization rates (Wang et al., 2017).
2.2.4.5 Cultural and Social Norms
Cultural beliefs, attitudes, and social norms influence perceptions of health insurance within
communities. In some cultures, there may be stigma associated with seeking insurance or
reluctance to engage with formal healthcare systems. Addressing cultural barriers and tailoring
health insurance programs to align with community values can enhance acceptance and utilization
among diverse populations (Wang et al., 2020).
2.2.4.6 Trust in the Healthcare System
Trust in the healthcare system and insurance providers is critical for encouraging enrollment and
utilization of health insurance. Negative experiences or perceptions of inefficiency, corruption, or
inadequate quality of care may erode trust and deter individuals from seeking insurance coverage.
Building trust through transparent communication, responsive customer service, and quality
healthcare delivery is essential for promoting confidence in health insurance programs (Umeh and
Feeley, 2017).
2.2.4.7 Policy and Regulatory Environment
The regulatory framework and policy environment surrounding health insurance impact its
accessibility, affordability, and attractiveness to consumers. Government policies, subsidies,
mandates, and regulations shape the structure of health insurance markets, affecting coverage
options, premiums, and benefit packages. Policy interventions aimed at expanding coverage,
improving affordability, and enhancing consumer protections can influence individuals' decisions
to enroll in health insurance plans (Umeh and Feeley, 2017).
2.2.4.8 Geographical Accessibility and Infrastructure
Access to health insurance may be influenced by geographical factors such as proximity to
insurance offices, healthcare facilities, or enrollment centers. In rural or underserved areas with
limited infrastructure, logistical barriers may impede individuals' ability to enroll in health
insurance programs. Enhancing geographical accessibility through mobile enrollment services,
community outreach initiatives, or telehealth platforms can facilitate uptake among populations
with limited access to traditional insurance channels (Udeh et al., 2016).
2.2.5 Strategies to Improve HealthCare Financing in Nigeria
2.2.5.1 Increase Government Spending on Healthcare
Nigeria currently allocates a relatively small portion of its budget to healthcare, leading to
underfunding of critical healthcare services and infrastructure. Increasing government spending
on healthcare involves not only raising the overall healthcare budget but also ensuring that funds
are disbursed efficiently and effectively to address the most pressing healthcare needs. Adequate
government spending is essential for various aspects of healthcare, including building and
maintaining healthcare infrastructure, procuring medical equipment and supplies, training
healthcare workers, and subsidizing healthcare services for vulnerable populations. Moreover,
increased government spending on healthcare can contribute to economic development by creating
jobs, stimulating demand for goods and services, and improving the overall health and productivity
of the population (WHO, 2019).
2.2.5.2 Strengthen Healthcare Infrastructure
Nigeria faces significant challenges in healthcare infrastructure, including inadequate facilities,
outdated equipment, and insufficient healthcare workforce. Strengthening healthcare infrastructure
requires substantial investments in upgrading existing healthcare facilities, constructing new ones,
and equipping them with modern medical technology and supplies. Improving healthcare
infrastructure not only expands access to healthcare services but also enhances the quality of care
provided, leading to better health outcomes and patient satisfaction. Additionally, investments in
healthcare infrastructure have spillover effects on the economy, creating employment
opportunities, attracting private sector investment, and stimulating economic growth in the
healthcare sector and beyond (WHO, 2019).
2.2.5.3 Expand Health Insurance Coverage
Health insurance coverage in Nigeria remains low, with a significant proportion of the population
lacking financial protection against healthcare costs. Expanding health insurance coverage
involves scaling up existing health insurance schemes, such as the National Health Insurance
Scheme (NHIS), and implementing targeted initiatives to enroll more individuals and families,
especially those in the informal sector and vulnerable groups. Providing incentives such as
subsidies, tax breaks, and employer contributions can encourage more people to enroll in health
insurance programs, thereby increasing coverage and reducing reliance on out-of-pocket payments
for healthcare. Furthermore, expanding health insurance coverage helps pool risks, improve risksharing mechanisms, and enhance financial sustainability in the healthcare system (NHIS, 2020).
2.2.5.4 Promote Community-Based Health Financing
Community-based health financing mechanisms, such as community health insurance schemes
and health savings groups, can complement formal health insurance programs and improve
financial risk protection for communities. These initiatives mobilize local resources, promote
solidarity among community members, and empower communities to take ownership of their
healthcare needs and priorities. Community-based health financing mechanisms leverage social
capital and local knowledge to expand access to healthcare services, particularly in underserved
areas where formal health insurance may not reach. Moreover, community involvement in health
financing fosters accountability, transparency, and sustainability in healthcare service delivery,
leading to more responsive and effective healthcare systems (NHIS, 2020).
2.2.5.5 Enhance Revenue Generation in the Healthcare Sector
Diversifying revenue sources in the healthcare sector can reduce reliance on government funding
and external aid, thereby enhancing financial sustainability and autonomy. Exploring alternative
sources of healthcare financing, such as innovative financing mechanisms (e.g., health bonds,
health impact bonds) and public-private partnerships (PPPs), can mobilize additional resources for
healthcare while leveraging private sector expertise and investment. Public-private partnerships
can facilitate the development of healthcare infrastructure, technology, and services through
collaboration between government agencies, private companies, and non-profit organizations.
Furthermore, donor funding and international partnerships can play a complementary role in
supporting healthcare initiatives, filling funding gaps, and addressing specific health challenges,
such as disease outbreaks and humanitarian crises (NHIS, 2020).
2.2.5.6 Improve Healthcare Efficiency and Accountability
Strengthening healthcare governance, management, and accountability mechanisms is essential
for optimizing resource allocation, minimizing wastage and inefficiencies, and improving the
quality of healthcare services. Transparent budgeting and financial management systems, regular
audits, and performance evaluations can help identify areas for improvement and ensure that
healthcare resources are used effectively and efficiently. Promoting integrity and accountability in
healthcare service delivery fosters public trust in the healthcare system and encourages greater
participation and engagement from stakeholders. Moreover, enhancing healthcare efficiency and
accountability leads to better health outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, and greater value for
money in healthcare spending (NHIS, 2020).
2.2.5.7 Invest in Health Information Systems
Developing robust health information systems and data analytics capabilities is critical for
collecting, analyzing, and disseminating health data to inform decision-making and resource
allocation in the healthcare sector. Timely and accurate health data are essential for identifying
health priorities, monitoring progress towards universal health coverage goals, and evaluating the
impact of healthcare interventions. Investing in health information technology infrastructure and
capacity building can improve data collection, management, and reporting processes, leading to
more informed and evidence-based policymaking. Furthermore, leveraging health information
systems can enhance coordination and collaboration among healthcare providers, facilitate patientcentered care, and support public health surveillance and disease control efforts (NHIS, 2020).
2.2.5.8 Address Health Workforce Challenges
Strengthening the healthcare workforce through education, training, recruitment, and retention
initiatives is essential for ensuring the delivery of quality healthcare services. Nigeria faces
significant challenges in healthcare workforce availability, distribution, and skill levels,
particularly in rural and underserved areas. Investing in health workforce development strategies,
such as expanding medical education and training programs, offering competitive salaries and
benefits, and providing professional development opportunities, can attract and retain qualified
healthcare professionals. Additionally, deploying innovative workforce models, such as taskshifting and telemedicine, can optimize healthcare delivery, improve access to care, and address
workforce shortages in remote areas (NHIS, 2020).
2.5 Conceptual Framework
2.5.1 Walt and Gilson Model
This study employs the health policy triangle, a conceptual model developed by Gill Walt and
Lucy Gilson, to frame and analyze the data collected from the field. This model emerged in
response to the healthcare system's growing crisis and the limited application of health policy
analysis in developing countries. Serving as a simplified representation of policy reality, it aims to
offer a comprehensive analysis of the health policy process and its impact on policy effectiveness.
According to Alostad et al. (2019), the model effectively examines the context, policy process,
policy content, and actors involved in policy development and implementation, highlighting their
interconnectedness throughout the policy cycle (Alostad et al., 2019).
The relevance of this model to the study lies in its specific development for health policy analysis
in developing countries. It acknowledges the nonlinear and incremental nature of policymaking
while systematically addressing the political aspects of health policy, often overlooked. Moreover,
it emphasizes understanding why certain policies are adopted over technically more efficient
alternatives, thereby shedding light on policy success or failure. Additionally, it can be used
retrospectively to better understand past health policy reforms and prospectively to plan for more
effective policy implementation.
In this study, the health policy triangle serves as a conceptual framework rather than a theory,
providing a broad framework for organizing the collected data. Walt and Gilson (1994) argue that
health policy often focuses solely on policy content while neglecting the actors, processes, and
contexts involved in policy reform. They emphasize the importance of considering these
dimensions, as they can significantly influence policy choice and implementation effectiveness.
The dynamic nature of policy settings, relationships between partners, and institutions underscores
the need to pay attention to the policy development process, decision-making, and implementation
processes. Therefore, the health policy triangle offers a valuable tool for analyzing and
understanding the complexities of health policy in developing country contexts.
CONTEXT
ACTORS
CONTENT
Source: Walt & Gilson (1994:254)
Figure 1: Health Policy Triangle
PROCESS
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 STUDY AREA DESCRIPTION
The study aims to delve into the intricate fabric of health insurance awareness and utilization
among the residents of Ilorin Metropolis, Kwara State, Nigeria. Situated as the bustling capital city
of Kwara State, Ilorin Metropolis is not merely a geographical location but a melting pot of
cultures, socioeconomic backgrounds, and diverse livelihoods. Its urban landscape encompasses a
myriad of neighborhoods, each with its own distinct character and socio-economic dynamics.
From the vibrant markets teeming with activity to the serene residential enclaves, Ilorin Metropolis
encapsulates the essence of urban life in Nigeria. This study seeks to navigate the labyrinth of
health insurance awareness and usage within this dynamic urban environment. By examining the
knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of residents towards health insurance, we aim to shed light on
the factors influencing its uptake and efficacy in meeting the healthcare needs of the populace.
Ilorin Metropolis, with its heterogeneous population and multifaceted healthcare landscape,
provides a fertile ground for exploring the complexities surrounding health insurance access and
utilization in Nigeria.
3.2 ADVOCACY/COMMUNITY ENTRY
Before embarking on data collection, it is imperative to lay the groundwork for community
engagement and stakeholder involvement. This involves obtaining ethical clearance from relevant
authorities and fostering partnerships with local government officials, community leaders, and key
stakeholders. Through advocacy efforts, we aim to raise awareness about the study objectives,
garner support from community members, and establish rapport with the local populace.
Community entry entails more than just gaining access; it requires building trust, demonstrating
respect for cultural norms, and fostering meaningful collaborations. By actively involving
community leaders and engaging in transparent communication, we can ensure that the research
process is conducted ethically and with the full participation of the community. This collaborative
approach not only enhances the credibility of the study but also fosters a sense of ownership and
empowerment among community members.
3.3 STUDY POPULATION
The study population comprises the diverse array of individuals who call Ilorin Metropolis their
home. From the bustling streets of commercial centers to the tranquil neighborhoods nestled on
the outskirts of the city, residents of all ages, backgrounds, and walks of life will be included in
the study. By casting a wide net and capturing the full spectrum of demographic diversity within
the metropolis, we aim to obtain a comprehensive understanding of health insurance awareness
and utilization across different segments of the population. Young and old, rich and poor, urban
and rural – each demographic group brings its own unique perspective to the table. By ensuring
representation from all strata of society, we can uncover nuanced insights into the barriers and
facilitators of health insurance access and uptake. Through inclusive sampling strategies and
targeted outreach efforts, we strive to give voice to the diverse array of voices that make up the
fabric of Ilorin Metropolis.
3.4 STUDY DESIGN
A descriptive cross-sectional research design will serve as the backbone of this study, allowing us
to capture a snapshot of health insurance awareness and utilization among residents of Ilorin
Metropolis at a specific point in time. This design facilitates the collection of data on key variables
such as knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to health insurance, providing a foundation for
subsequent analysis and interpretation. The cross-sectional nature of the study enables us to
examine associations between variables of interest and identify patterns or trends within the
population. By administering structured questionnaires and conducting interviews, we can gather
rich qualitative and quantitative data that offer insights into the factors shaping health insurance
perceptions and practices among residents. Through meticulous planning and rigorous
methodology, we aim to generate findings that are both robust and relevant to the local context.
3.5 INCLUSION CRITERIA
Inclusion criteria define the parameters for participation in the study, ensuring that eligible
individuals meet certain criteria deemed essential for the research objectives. For this study,
inclusion criteria encompass residents of Ilorin Metropolis aged 18 years and above who are
willing to provide informed consent to participate. Additionally, individuals with a history of
alcohol consumption or those at risk of alcoholism will be considered eligible for inclusion, as
their experiences and perspectives are integral to understanding the phenomenon under
investigation.
3.6 EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Exclusion criteria delineate conditions or circumstances under which individuals would be deemed
ineligible for participation in the study. In this context, individuals with severe mental or physical
health conditions that may impair their ability to effectively engage in the research process will be
excluded. Likewise, residents who are unwilling to provide consent or disclose information
pertinent to their alcohol consumption behaviors will not be included in the study population.
3.6 Sample Size Determination
A systematic random sampling technique is employed to select eligible participants from the target
population. To determine the sample size, we use the following formula:
Sample Size=(d2Z2×P×(1−P))
Where:
Z = Standard normal variate for a 95% confidence level (1.96)
P = Estimated prevalence of the knowledge and utilization of health insurance scheme (based on
previous studies)
d = Precision or margin of error (assumed as 5% or 0.05)
Using data from previous studies, assuming a prevalence (P) of 0.1, we calculate the sample size
as follows:
Sample Size = ((0.05)2(1.96)2×0.1×(1−0.462)/0.052)
Sample Size = ((3.8416)×0.1×0.538/0.0025)
Sample Size ≈ 82 residents
Thus, the required sample size for the study is 82 residents
3.7 SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
The sampling technique employed in this study will be systematic random sampling, which
involves selecting participants from the target population in a structured and unbiased manner.
This approach ensures that every individual in the population has an equal chance of being
included in the sample, thereby minimizing the potential for selection bias. By systematically
selecting participants at predetermined intervals, we can obtain a representative sample that
accurately reflects the demographic composition of the population.
3.8 RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS- VALIDITY, PRETESTING, PILOT STUDY
The research instruments utilized in this study will undergo rigorous validation procedures to
ensure their reliability and validity. Pretesting will be conducted in a local community close to
Elemere to ascertain the clarity, applicability, and appropriateness of the instruments. A pilot study
will also be conducted among a subset of participants to assess the reliability and validity of the
data collection process, with feedback obtained used to refine the instruments and enhance their
suitability for the main study.
3.9 METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Data collection will be carried out through the administration of semi-structured close-ended
questionnaires designed to elicit information on individuals' perceptions and knowledge of peer
influence, social environment, psychological factors, and alcohol consumption behaviors among
young adults in Elemere Community, Moro LGA, Kwara State. By employing a combination of
structured questionnaires and interviews, we can capture a comprehensive range of perspectives
and experiences related to alcoholism among young adults in the target population.
3.10 MEASUREMENT OF VARIABLES AND DATA PROCESSING
The survey data collected through structured questionnaires will encompass a wide range of
variables, including demographic information, perceptions of young adults regarding the effects
of peer influence, social environment, and psychological factors on alcoholism. Upon collection,
the acquired data will be coded, entered into a secure database, and subjected to rigorous quality
checks to ensure accuracy and completeness. Statistical software will be employed for data
analysis, employing appropriate statistical tests to examine relationships and associations between
variables.
3.11 METHODS OF DATA MANAGEMENT AND ANALYSIS
Data management will involve the systematic organization, storage, and analysis of collected
information to derive meaningful insights and conclusions. Descriptive statistics, such as
frequency distributions and measures of central tendency, will be used to summarize the data and
identify trends or patterns. Inferential statistics, including chi-square tests and logistic regression
analysis, will be employed to explore associations between variables and identify.
3.12 CONSENT/METHODS OF PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS
Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to their involvement in the
study, ensuring voluntary participation and respect for individual autonomy. Measures will be
implemented to safeguard participants' confidentiality and privacy, including secure storage of
data and restricted access to sensitive information. Participants will be assured of their right to
withdraw from the study at any time without facing adverse consequences.
3.13 ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Ethical approval for the study will be sought from the relevant institutional review board, adhering
to established guidelines and principles governing research involving human subjects.
Transparency, integrity, and respect for participants' rights and welfare will guide all aspects of
the research process, from study design and data collection to analysis and dissemination of
findings. Ethical considerations will be paramount in ensuring the integrity and credibility of the
study outcomes.
3.14 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
Limitations inherent to the study include potential biases associated with self-reported data,
reliance on a cross-sectional design, and constraints related to generalizability beyond the study
population and setting. Efforts will be made to mitigate these limitations through rigorous
methodological approaches, transparency in reporting, and acknowledgment of study constraints
in the interpretation of findings
RERFERENCES
Ananaba, T. L., Etcheson, J. I., Gwam, C. U., George, N. E., Mohamed, N. S., Mistry, J. B. and
Bhave, A. (2018). Short-term outcomes for total knee arthroplasty patients with active
extension lag. Annals of Translational Medicine, 6(11):1-30
Alostad, A. H., Steinke, D. T. and Schafheutle, E. I. (2019). A qualitative exploration of Bahrain
and Kuwait herbal medicine registration systems: policy implementation and readiness to
change. Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 12(1):32-50.
Anetoh, M. U., Jibuaku, C. H., Nduka, S. O. and Uzodinma, S. U. (2017). Knowledge and
Implementation of Tertiary Institutions’ Social Health Insurance Programme (TISHIP) in
Nigeria: a case study of Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka. Pan African Medical
Journal, 28(1):1-12
Asakitikpi, A. E. (2019). Healthcare coverage and affordability in Nigeria: An alternative model
to equitable healthcare delivery. Universal Health Coverage, 45:1-10
Batalden, P. (2018). Getting more health from healthcare: quality improvement must acknowledge
patient coproduction—an essay by Paul Batalden. Bmj, 78:362-400.
Beattie, S., Woodman, T., Fakehy, M. and Dempsey, C. (2016). The role of performance feedback
on the self-efficacy–performance relationship. Sport, Exercise, and Performance
Psychology, 5(1):1-10.
Choi, T. M., Chiu, C. H. and Chan, H. K. (2016). Risk management of logistics
systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 90:1-6.
Cuadrado, A., Rojo, A. I., Wells, G., Hayes, J. D., Cousin, S. P., Rumsey, W. L. and DinkovaKostova, A. T. (2019). Therapeutic targeting of the NRF2 and KEAP1 partnership in
chronic diseases. Nature reviews Drug discovery, 18(4):295-317.
Deo, N. and Trivedi, M. M. (2018). Convolutional social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction.
In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition
workshops (23:1468-1476).
Elias C, A., Anne C, N., Chinonso J, O., Pamela C, O., Anthony C, O. and Chukwuebuka V, O.
(2019). Utilization of tertiary institutions social health insurance programme (TISHIP)
among undergraduate students in Enugu State. Nigerian Journal of Medicine, 28(4):413422.
Fredriksson, P., Hensvik, L. and Skans, O. N. (2018). Mismatch of talent: Evidence on match
quality, entry wages, and job mobility. American Economic Review, 108(11):3303-3338.
Gaeta, M., Bandera, F., Tassinari, F., Capasso, L., Cargnelutti, M., Pelissero, G. and Ricci, C.
(2017). Is epicardial fat depot associated with atrial fibrillation? A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Europace, 19(5):747-752.
Halder, S. and Sarda, R. (2021). Promoting intangible cultural heritage (ICH) tourism: Strategy
for socioeconomic development of snake charmers (India) through geoeducation,
geotourism
and
geoconservation.
International
Journal
of
Geoheritage
and
Parks, 9(2):212-232.
Ichoku, H. E. and Ifelunini, A. I. (2017). The changing political undercurrents in health services
delivery in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Health Services, 47(3):489-503.
Manida, M., Nedumaran, G. and Nadu, T. (2021). Problems and Feasible Of Green Based
Agriculture Products. International Journal of Public Health and Safety, 6(3):1-4.
Mathauer, I., Saksena, P. and Kutzin, J. (2019). Pooling arrangements in health financing systems:
a proposed classification. International journal for equity in health, 18:1-11.
National Health Insurance Scheme, (2020). Tertiary Social Health Insurance Programme
(TISHIP)—National Health Insurance Scheme [Internet]. 2020. Available from:
https://www.nhis.gov.
ng/tertiary-social-health-insurance-programmetiship/.
[Last
accessed on 2020 Jul 23]
Nobles, A. L., Curtis, B. A., Ngo, D. A., Vardell, E. and Holstege, C. P. (2019). Health insurance
literacy: A mixed methods study of college students. Journal of American College
Health, 67(5):469-478.
Sule, H. H. (2020). Challenges of Implementing Tertiary Institution Social Health Insurance
Programme:
Empirical
Evidence
From
Southwest
Nigeria.
Canadian
Social
Science, 16(6):21-31.
Udeh, E.I., Onwujekwe, O.E., Adewole, D.A. and Onoka, C.A. (2016). Exploring the threshold
premium for viable community based health insurance schemes in Nigeria. BMC Research
Notes, 9:383-400
Uguru, N., Onwujekwe, O., Ogu, U. U. and Uguru, C. (2020). Access to Oral health care: a focus
on dental caries treatment provision in Enugu Nigeria. BMC Oral Health, 20:1-13.
Uguru, N. P., Uguru, C. C., Ogu, U. U., Agwu, P. C., Okeke, C. C., Onyejaka, N. and Eze, N.
(2022). Tertiary Institutions’ Social Health Insurance Program: Awareness, knowledge,
and utilization for dental treatment among students of a Nigerian University. International
Journal of Medicine and Health Development, 27(4): 337-343.
Umeh, C.A. and Feeley, F.G. (2017). Inequitable access to health care by the poor in communitybased health insurance programs: a review of studies from low-and middle-income
countries. Global Health: science and practice, 5(2):299-314
Wang, H., Otoo, N. and Dsane-Selby, L. (2017). Ghana national health insurance scheme:
improving financial sustainability based on expenditure review. World Bank Studies.
Washington DC: World Bank.
Wang, H., Wang, S. and Yu, K. (2020). COVID-19 infection epidemic: the medical management
strategies in Heilongjiang Province, China. Critical Care, 24(107):1-4
Walt, G. and Gilson, L. (1994). Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central
role of policy analysis. Health policy and planning, 9(4):353-370.
WHO Regional Office for Africa, (2019). Primary Health Care Programme in the WHO African
Region from Alma-Ata to Ouagadougou and beyond. Available online at:
http://www.searo.who.int/docs/default-source/primary-health-care-conference/phcregional-report-africa.pdf?sfvrsn=73f1301f_2 (Accessed 12 December 2019).
WHO Regional Office for Africa, (2020). COVID-19 Africa numbers at a glance. Available
online at: https://www.afro.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus-covid-19 (Accessed 10
September 2020)
Witter, M. P., Doan, T. P., Jacobsen, B., Nilssen, E. S. and Ohara, S. (2017). Architecture of the
entorhinal cortex a review of entorhinal anatomy in rodents with some comparative
notes. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 11:46-50.