Uploaded by mardebesa

Peer-Evaluation

advertisement
PEER EVALUATION (Confidential, do not disclose this assessment to your groupmates)
Please write your name and the names of all of your group members and rate the degree
to which each member fulfilled his/her responsibilities in completing the activity. The possible
ratings are as follows:
Group Member
Delgaco, Archie B.
Role
•
•
•
Ebonite, Marinel P.
•
•
Escuro, M-Joselle V.
•
•
Debesa, Marco T.
•
•
Gather information
about the benefits.
Provided examples of
tundra.
Participate in the editing
of the Brochure.
Gathered information
about the roles of
tundra.
Participate in the editing
of the brochure.
Gathered information
about Tundra types.
Take part on the editing
of the brochure.
Gathered information
about characteristics of
Tundra.
Participate in the editing
of the Brochure.
Rating
10
10
10
Rating Criteria
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Satisfactory
Ordinary
Marginal
Deficient
Unsatisfactory
Superficial
No show
Consistently went above and beyond-tutored groupmates, carried more
than his/her fair share of load, led discussions, provided references and
explanations, insightful, motivates and encourages others.
Consistently did what he/she was supposed to do, very well prepared and
cooperative, generate discussions, always positive and encouraging
Always did what he/she was supposed to do, prepared and cooperative
but doesn’t go beyond what is necessary, participate in discussions
Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptably prepared and
cooperative, tries to participate in discussions
Often did what he/she was supposed to do, sometimes participates in
discussions
Sometimes fail to participate in discussions, rarely prepared
Often fail to participate in discussions, unprepared
Consistently fail to participate in discussions, unprepared, demotivate
others
Practically no participation
No participation at all
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Download