The reading and the lecture presented contrasting viowpoints on the hard rules to management
and storing of coal ash. While the passage wirte that in America, campanies had opposite idea about
storing of coal ash and beside that three theories about storing caol ash but the professor in the lecture
was disagree about all.
One hypothesis from the reading suggests that most campanies said, "positive enviremental
regulation previously exist, forexample; liner." on the other hand, the professor form lecture points out that
we need to tough laws to reject the harmful of the caol ash in the envirinment. And also mentioned that the
rules we have now, for instance; those needs campanies to use line are not really suffecient.
Another hypothesises from the reasing posit that some psychoanalyst think that making very hard
laws for storing and managing coal ash may discourage the recycle of coal ash in to other products
outcomes. In the contrast of that the professor of the lecture express that making hard laws for storing and
managing of caol ash doesn't meant that the users stope using from the recycle coal ash products. there is
other products forexaple;the storage and handling Marcury, it could use for 50 years in recycle.
Finally the passage depict that making hard laws would result in high cost for strong campanies
and the campanies would bend to increase the prices. on the other sides the professor from the lecture
argue that, it is right that the charge for storage will maximize but on the other hand, at the end it is useful
for us. and by performing to each fimlies of a unite societe in will not cost expensive