FOREIGN TRADE UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS & INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
----000----
MACROECONOMICS ASSIGNMENT
THE IMPACTS OF THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR
ON THE INFLATION RATE IN EUROPE
Instructor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hoang Xuan Binh
Class: KTE204E(GD2-HK2-2223)61CTTTKT.1
GROUP 4
Hanoi, June 2023
Members
Name
Student ID
Phạm Hải Anh
2212140009
Ngô Thùy Dương
2213140020
Nguyễn Hải Giang
2212140023
Nguyễn Hương Giang
2212140024
Lê Quỳnh Nga
2212140063
Nguyễn Trần Bảo Ngọc
2212140065
Phạm Thị Minh Ngọc
2212140066
Nguyễn Hương Quỳnh
2212140071
Hoàng Thủy Tiên
2212140074
Phạm Thị Minh Trang
2212140080
Page | 1
Table of contents
Introduction
1. Definition
1.1. Definition
1.2. Measuring inflation:
1.3. Characteristics:
1.4. Causes of inflation
2. Background and current state of the war
2.1. Cause
2.1.1. The root cause:
2.1.2. Direct cause:
2.2. Timeline:
2.3. EU sanctions against Russia over Ukraine
2.3.1. Sanctions against individual and entities
2.3.2. Economic sanctions
2.4. Russia’s response
3. The Economic Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Crisis on Europe
3.1. Food crisis in Europe
3.1.1. Impacts on Food Production, Processing, and Storage.
3.1.2. Impacts on food transport logistics
3.1.3. Impacts of food market/retail
3.1.4. Impacts on consumer
3.1.5. Impacts on food dependent services
3.2. Energy crisis in Europe
3.2.1. Dependence on energy imports of Europe
3.2.2. Primary energy sources
3.2.3. Fallout of Russia-Ukraine War
3.3. Impacts on the inflation rate
3.3.1. Impacts in the UK
3.3.2. Impacts in other European Nations
4. How is the EU dealing with the crisis?
4.1. Improving food resilience against the Russia-Ukraine conflict
4.2. Energy transition
Conclusion
References
3
4
4
4
4
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
8
8
8
10
10
10
10
11
14
14
15
15
16
17
18
18
20
23
24
27
28
30
Page | 2
Introduction
The Russia-Ukraine War is an ongoing crisis posing challenges in multiple aspects on an
international scale. The conflict starting in February 2022 has exerted massive impacts on the
global economy with Europe most profoundly affected. European nations, specifically European
Union members and the United Kingdom, suffer from fluctuations in the food and energy
market, resulting in an unprecedented inflation rate witnessed recently.
As food and energy are essential elements in national domestic demands, the topic “The
Impacts of the Russia-Ukraine War on the Inflation Rate in Europe” will bring a closer look at
the current state of European countries in the context of the global crisis, thus inferring
implications for other countries to respond to the conflict and devise sustainable approach in the
future.
The research aims to equip a sufficient understanding of the Russian invasion of Ukraine
and its economic implications, specifically the inflation rate in Europe, the most affected area in
the global crisis. Furthermore, the paper targets to infer possible solutions to the current crisis
which are applicable to directly and indirectly affected nations.
The research paper covers the economic impacts of the Russia-Ukraine War on the
inflation rate in Europe, specifically in the food and energy market. The paper explores the
economic implications since the beginning of the conflict combined with post-pandemic data to
fully examine the situation of European countries, including the European Union country
members and the United Kingdom.
Statistical methods, comparative methods, and data synthesis are implemented in the
research paper. Secondary data is essential in the synthesizing process, referenced from various
sources including journal articles, statistical reports, and websites.
Page | 3
1.
1.1.
Definition
Definition
Inflation is a rise in prices, which can be translated as the decline of purchasing power of
money over time. (Investopedia)
1.2. Measuring inflation:
The two most frequently cited indexes that calculate the inflation rate in the U.S. are the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) and the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (PCE).
These two measures take different approaches to measuring and calculating inflation.
(Forbes/advisor/investing)
CPI Inflation: The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) calculates CPI inflation by gathering
spending data of regular consumers around the U.S. It tracks a basket of commonly purchased
goods and services, including food, gasoline, prescription drugs, college tuition and mortgage
payments, to gauge how prices generally change over time. Two components of this
basket—food and energy—can see very significant changes in price from one month to the next,
depending on seasonal demand and potential supply disruptions at home and abroad. Therefore,
the BLS also publishes Core CPI, a measure of so-called “underlying inflation,” which
intentionally leaves out volatile food and energy prices. The CPI is constructed each month using
80,000 items in a fixed basket of goods and services representing what Americans buy in their
everyday lives. The BLS calculates CPI inflation by taking the average weighted cost of a basket
of goods in a given month and dividing it by the same basket from the previous month.
PCE Inflation: is somewhat similarly to how CPI inflation is calculated. The key
difference is where the data comes from: Instead of asking consumers how much they’re
spending on certain goods and services, the PCE tracks the prices businesses report selling goods
and services for. PCE is in fact able to better track expenditures that consumers do not pay for
directly, like medical care paid for by employer-provided insurance or Medicare and Medicaid.
CPI doesn’t keep up with these in-direct expenses. Finally, PCE’s basket of goods is less fixed
than CPI’s, which helps it more effective in calculating inflation when consumers substitute one
kind of good or service for another when it gets more expensive. The BEA’s personal
consumption expenditures price index also calculates a core PCE measure, like CPI, that strips
out volatile food and energy prices. The Federal Reserve considers Core PCE to be its most
important measure of inflation in the U.S.
1.3.
Characteristics:
Overall impact: distort purchasing power over time for recipients and payers of fixed
interest rates. Inflation can be beneficial for some people, yet disadvantageous for others.
Deflation: When prices are falling, consumers delay making purchases, anticipating
lower prices in the future. For the economy this means less economic activity, less income
generated by producers, and lower economic growth.
Benefit: low, stable, and—most importantly—predictable inflation is good for an
economy. If inflation is low and predictable, it is easier to capture it in price-adjustment contracts
and interest rates, reducing its distortionary impact. Moreover, knowing that prices will be
slightly higher in the future gives consumers an incentive to make purchases sooner, which
boosts economic activity. Many central bankers have made their primary policy objective
maintaining low and stable inflation, a policy called inflation targeting.
Page | 4
1.4.
Causes of inflation
The causes of inflation can be grouped into three broad categories: demand-pull,
cost-push and inflation expectations (Reserve Bank of Australia).
Demand-pull inflation arises when the aggregate demand increases to exceed the
aggregate supply that can be sustainably produced. Aggregate demand might increase because
there is an increase in spending by consumers, businesses or government, or an increase in net
exports. An increase in the money supply will tend to cause inflation since customers often want
to spend more when they have more money (Harvard Business Review, 2022).
Cost-push inflation occurs when the aggregate supply falls compared to aggregate
demand. A decrease in aggregate supply is often caused by an increase in the cost of production
(Reserve Bank of Australia). Supply shocks - major disruptions to an important economic input,
like materials or energy - can lead to cost of production increasing. (Harvard Business Review,
2022).
Inflation expectations are the beliefs that households and firms have about future price
increases. For example, if workers expect future inflation to be higher, they may demand higher
wages to make up for the expected loss of their purchasing power.
Page | 5
2.
2.1.
2.1.1.
Background and current state of the war
Cause
The root cause:
The US and Russia relationship after the Cold War relationship is competition rather than
cooperation, sometimes on the verge of confrontation. Relations between Russia and NATO fell
into crisis. Both sides view each other as the first threat and take appropriate measures in the
Ukraine war.
2.1.2. Direct cause:
The conflict between the Ukrainian government and the Russian-backed Donbass
separatist forces (including the DPR and LPR) increased, especially after October 2021, making
the peace negotiation process under the Agreement Minsk 2 - the only solution to the Ukrainian
political crisis - difficult to achieve. The US and NATO not only transferred weapons to Ukraine,
but also deployed medium-range missiles and military forces on the territory of NATO - Eastern
Europe towards Russia. In response to those moves, Russia deployed more than 100,000 troops
along its land border with Ukraine, the Crimea peninsula, and concentrated troops in Ukraine's
neighbor Belarus in the name of joint exercises, as well as military exercises like sending six
modern warships into the Black Sea. The United States and its NATO ally did not respond to
Russia's eight-point security proposal sent to the United States and NATO in mid-December
2021, with four core contents: NATO does not admit Ukraine and its allies convention of the
Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS); removal of US nuclear weapons from Europe;
NATO withdraws all troops or weapons deployed to the countries participating in the alliance to
the time before 1997, including countries such as Poland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia; do not
conduct exercises in countries near the territory of Russia.
2.2. Timeline:
Here’s a 1-year timeline of key events since the war between Russia and Ukraine started
in February 2022.
● February 2022: The beginning of a war
On 24 February, President Vladimir Putin launched a “special military operation” ordering his
troops into Ukraine. Speaking on Russian state television, he announced the purpose of this
operation as: “We will strive to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine and will bring to justice those
who committed multiple bloody crimes against civilians including Russian citizens”.
Russia ordered tens of thousands of Russian troops into Ukraine. Despite Putin threatening
anyone trying to interfere, Ukraine was determined to fight back and had no intention of
surrendering. Response to Russia's aggressive operation, the EU imposed a widespread package
of sanctions on Moscow (European Commission, 2022) and also prepared to open its doors to
hundreds of thousands of refugees pouring out of Ukraine.
● March 2022:
Russia is forced to scale back its war goals following stiff resistance from Ukrainian forces,
switching focus to the Donbas region. The conflict escalates the global food crisis and Ukraine’s
government announces a ban on a wide range of agricultural exports. World food prices reach a
record high (FAO, 2022).
● June 2022:
According to the European Council chief Charles Micheal, the EU decided to partially phase out
Russian oil: “agreement to ban export of Russian oil to the EU. This immediately covers more
Page | 6
than 2/3 of oil imports from Russia, cutting a huge source of financing for its war machine,” and
aims to cut 90% of oil imports from Russia by the end of the year.
● July 2022:
Russian energy giant Gazprom said it would halve gas supplies to Europe through the Nord
Stream 1 pipeline. Moscow and Kyiv agreed a deal to re-open Ukraine’s Black Sea ports which
have been blockaded by the Russian navy, hoping this will ease the global food crisis (Reuters,
2022).
● September 2022:
European gas prices spiked by as much as 30% (Energy, E.C, 2022) since Gazprom said the
Nord Stream 1 pipeline had been closed for temporary maintenance work.
Following Ukraine's counter-offensive launch in the north-east, Russian President Vladimir Putin
declared the immediate partial mobilization of 300,000 reservists.
● October 2022:
Crimea bridge, which is an strategically important
location of Russian forces, was severely damaged
by an unamingly-caused explosion. Russia began
targeting Ukrainian official power facilities.
● December 2022:
Since president Zelenskyy’s first foreign trip to
address the US Congress, the US announced it was
sending nearly 2$ billion in additional security
assistance to Ukraine (DoD, 2022).
The European Central Bank says it expects inflation
to remain above its 2% target for the next 3 years.
Several factors caused inflation to spike at 10.6% in
October across the 19 countries that use the euro
(Bank, E.C, 2022).
● February 2023:
At the EU summit in Brussels, the EU wanted to
approve the 10th package of sanctions against
Russia. President Joe Biden made a visit to Kyiv.
2.3. EU sanctions against Russia over Ukraine
In response to the unprecedented aggression against Ukraine, the EU has so far adopted
10 packages of hard-hitting sanctions against Russia. They are targeting the core of Russia’s
economy and depriving it of critical and modern technologies and markets, significantly
curtailing its ability to wage the war.
The sanctions are designed to: cripple the Kremlin’s ability to finance the war; impose
clear economic and political costs on Russia’s political elite responsible for invasion; diminish
Russia's base.
These measures are targeted, are not affecting energy and agrifood exports from Russia to
third countries, and are well coordinated with the allies.
2.3.1. Sanctions against individual and entities
Assets freeze / travel ban against: Vladimir Putin, Sergey Lavrov, Yevgeny Prigozhin,
Viktor and Oleksandr Yanukovych, Russian State Duma members, National Security Council
members, military staff and high-ranking officials, businesspeople, propagandists and oligarchs.
Page | 7
Assets freeze against: banks and financial institutions, companies in the military and
defense sectors, companies in the aviation, shipbuilding and machine building sectors, armed
forces and paramilitary groups, political parties, media organizations responsible for propaganda
and disinformation.
2.3.2. Economic sanctions
● Finance: SWIFT ban for 10 Russian banks, restrictions on Russia’s access to the EU’s
capital and financial markets, ban on transactions with the Russian Central Bank, ban on
supply of euro-denominated banknotes to Russia, ban on provision of crypto-wallets to
Russian persons.
● Transport: closure of EU airspace to all Russian-owned aircraft, closure of EU ports to
Russian vessels, ban on Russian road transport operators, ban on maritime transport of
Russian oil to third countries, ban on exports to Russia of goods and technology in the
aviation, maritime and space sectors
● Energy: ban on imports from Russia of oil and coal, price cap related to the maritime
transport of Russian oil, ban on exports to Russia of goods and technologies in the oil
refining sector, ban on new investments in the Russian energy and mining sector, ban on
providing gas storage capacity to Russian nationals.
● Defense: Ban on exports to Russia of: dual-use goods and technology for military use,
drone engines, arms and civilian firearms, ammunition, military vehicles and paramilitary
equipment.
● Raw materials and other goods: Ban on exports to Russia of: luxury goods, ban on
imports from Russia of: steel, iron, cement and asphalt, wood, paper, synthetic rubber and
plastics; seafood, spirits, cigarettes and cosmetics; gold, including jewelry.
● Services: Ban to provide to Russia or Russian persons: architectural and engineering
services, IT consultancy and legal advisory services, advertising, market research and
public opinion polling services.
● Restrictions on media: Suspension of broadcasting activities in the EU of some Russian
media outlets: Sputnik and subsidiaries, Russia Today and subsidiaries, Rossiya RTR /
RTR Planeta, Rossiya 24 / Russia 24, Rossiya 1, TV Centre International, NTV / NTV
Mir, REN TV, Perviy Kanal.
● Visa measures: Suspension of visa facilitation agreement between the EU and Russia,
suspension of visa facilitation provisions for Russian diplomats and businesspeople.
2.4. Russia’s response
Following sanctions of Russia of US and allies, Russia has imposed significant “counter
sanctions” against “unfriendly countries”, which currently includes the United States, all EU
member states, Albania, Andorra, Australia, Canada, Iceland, Japan, Liechtenstein, Micronesia,
Monaco, Montenegro, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, San Marino, Singapore, South
Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine the UK as well as companies that are trying to comply with
these countries (Russian Government, 2022). As of April 29, 2022, the following measures have
been adopted by Russia against so-called “unfriendly states”:
● Russian debtors are allowed to pay off their large debts (i.e., debts exceeding 10 million
rubles = approx. 140,000 USD in value) to non-Russian creditors based in “unfriendly
states” in Russian rubles (instead of otherwise applicable currency) according to the
official exchange rate of the Bank of Russia as of the first day of the respective month.
(Russian President’s Decree, 2022)
Page | 8
Buyers of Russian natural gas based in “unfriendly states” (or in cases when gas is
supplied to an “unfriendly state”) are obliged to pay for gas in Russian rubles: (Russian
President’s Decree, 2022)
○ Non-compliance with this requirement could lead to a halt to further supplies.
○ The requirement is somewhat mitigated by the special payment procedure,
according to which buyers of gas must open accounts in both Russian rubles and
non-ruble currency at Gazprombank.
● Russian residents are prohibited, without a prior clearance by the Government
Commission for Control over Foreign Investments, from conducting the following
transactions with foreigners based in “unfriendly states” and persons controlled by such
foreigners:
○ Providing loans in rubles
○ Transferring ownership of securities; or
○ Transferring ownership of real estate. (Russian President’s Decree, 2022)
● The compensation to be paid to rightholders from “unfriendly states” for the use of an
invention, utility model or industrial design in cases where such protected subject-matter
may be used without their consent shall amount to 0% of the actual proceeds from the
production and sale of goods (Russian Government’s Regulation, 2022).
● Any money transfers from Russian accounts of nonresidents (companies or individuals)
from “unfriendly states” to their accounts outside of Russia are suspended for six months
(Russian President’s Decree, 2022).
● Companies from “unfriendly states” are prohibited from buying any non-ruble currency
in Russia. (Decision of the Board of Directors of the Bank of Russia of April 1, 2022)
● Russian state companies subject to sanctions by “unfriendly states” are allowed to refrain
from publishing information on their public procurement activities and their suppliers.
● Until December 31, 2022, Russian banks and financial institutions are allowed to refrain
from publishing certain information in order to avoid sanctions of “unfriendly states”
(Federal Law, 2022).
● Until December 31, 2022, Russian insurance companies are prohibited from entering into
contracts with insurance and reinsurance companies and insurance brokers from
“unfriendly states” (Federal Law, 2022).
● Several top officials of the United States, EU, UK and other countries with “unfriendly
state” status are banned from entering Russia.
In addition to the countersanctions in the narrow sense as described above, Russia has
taken numerous further measures which do not specifically target countries that have imposed
sanctions against Russia. Such countersanctions in the broad sense include measures generally
taken to mitigate the effects of international sanctions on the Russian economy as well as to stifle
free expression and limit media coverage that is critical of the government.
●
Page | 9
3.
3.1.
3.1.1.
The Economic Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Crisis on Europe
Food crisis in Europe
Impacts on Food Production, Processing, and Storage.
Ukraine has a major role in Europe in terms of agriculture and food production. The
national capability to cultivate soil, sow, and harvest crops has been reduced since the start of the
war. A consequence of these outcomes is food shortages for the local population and export
economy, both in the short and medium term.
Ukraine exported more than $9.4bn worth of cereals in 2020, around one-fifth of its total
exports, and it is ranked second global cereal exporter (Barklie, 2022). FAO (Borrell, 2022)
estimates that 20–30% of the areas allocated to winter cereal, maize, and sunflower seed
production will not be harvested or planted this spring. The main constraint in this aspect is
logistics and a shortage of maize and sunflower seeds is expected (FAO, 2022).
Russia's role in global food supply chains can be understood using reported production
and domestic supply statistics (Barklie, 2022). Ukraine’s wheat production is 3.2% of global
production and exports are 9.1% of the global wheat exports (FAO, 2022). Russia is the first
ranked global exporter of wheat, and Ukraine is the fifth ranked exporter and most critically a
key supplier of wheat to the World Food Programme.
Supply is specific and nations directly dependent on these agrifood supplies, including
some of the most vulnerable food security countries.
3.1.2. Impacts on food transport logistics
Major food security concerns due to the war include disruption of logistics and food
supply chains, access to agricultural inputs, and destruction of food system assets and
infrastructure (FAO, 2022).
Wheat is typically highlighted by current commenters. Ukraine ranked 8th in global
wheat production (FAOStat, 2020). Logistics and location stifle supply with the UN FAO
estimating that 49 percent of winter wheat and 38 percent of rye to be harvested in July–August
2022 are in occupied or war-affected areas. Most important to the global food system is where
this wheat and small grain production is exported, Ukraine is the 5th ranked global exporter of
wheat at 18.06 × 106 tonnes in 2020 which is 9% of global wheat exports (FAOStat). Importing
nations have a high dependency on this supply that will be limited by potential to harvest and
transport.
Most notably the war will restrict shipping from the Black Sea ports. Figure 2 shows the
importance of sunflowers in the central and Eastern Oblasts destroyed by war. Ukraine supplies
26% of global sunflower seed, exporting seed for processing and oil to India, China, and Western
Europe.
Page | 10
Figure 2: The March 2022 VCI and proportion of maize, sunflowers, and wheat produced in
each region (a) and March 2022 VCI and proportion of barley, rapeseed, soybean, and millet
produced in each region (b). The maximum proportion crop produced is 13% of the total and
each bar is relative to this 13% maximum. Data from UNFAO and USDA FAS, analysis
developed using MapInfo 10.0
3.1.3.
Impacts of food market/retail
The European Union (EU) has important commercial relationships with Ukraine,
importing wheat, maize, sunflower seed, and oil as well as malt, rye, and sorghum (European
Commission, 2022). The EU has a dependency on commodities and raw materials in the food
processing sector (Putsenteilo, 2018). The current uncertain situation about the progression of
the armed conflict poses a threat to disrupting agricultural supply chains between Ukraine and
European countries (Graham, 2022).
Page | 11
Figure 3: Importation of Ukrainian and European wheat, maize, sunflower seed and oil in 2020
The strategic importance of ports (especially Odessa) would restrict the transport of
wheat, cereals, and other commodities trade (Das & Gallagher, 2022). Currently, the Ukrainian
port operations are suspended, and efforts have been made to improve the transport using
railways, but the shipping by sea for Ukrainian commodities is limited (IGC, 2022). The main
destinations of Ukrainian wheat, maize, sunflower seeds, and oil in 2020 within the EU were
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain
where Ukraine is also the primary ranked nation for the source of these imported products
(Figure 3) (FAO, 2022).
The international market demonstrates the importance of commodities exported from
Ukraine. With the reduced supply of these commodities and continuous demand for them, buyers
in European countries are looking for alternative suppliers. Important global producers of these
commodities are Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, India, Mexico, and the USA
(Figure 4). It is important to consider that European countries and the main global producers of
these commodities were not accommodating the absence of Ukrainian commodities for trade offs
to be in place and active (European Commission, 2022). Consequently, the market has reacted to
the potential reduced supply of Ukrainian commodities for the European countries rather than
developing new markets. Commercialization of wheat and maize are affected and general
increase in their prices has gained new higher trading levels in relation to values commercialized
since the beginning of 2022 (European Commission, 2022). As Ukraine’s wheat exportation
remains stagnated, the export from major global producers (Australia, India, and Canada) have
increased (Graham, 2022)
Within the EU, the supply chains that are partly controlled and determined by Ukrainian
agricultural imports include the secondary food processing sector (especially baking, brewing,
and vegetable oil industries) which have direct impacts on retail and food service sectors
(Putensenteilo, 2018). As the Ukrainian crisis continues, the risk of retail disruption in these food
chains increases and leads to a potential downstream shortage of products for industries, grocery
and retail stores, and the food service sector. The lack of supplier diversity is not favorable for
the resilience of wheat, maize, and sunflower seed and oil. As sanctions against Russian fuels
(coal, oil, and gas) continue, the costs associated with road freight will play an important role in
Page | 12
the price of wheat, maize, and sunflower seed and oil to consumers as well as products and food
services related to these commodities (Destatis, 2022). Moreover, the processing sector may be
affected by strikes of carrier companies (EURACTIV, 2022), which may affect the capacity of
food supply chains to thrive in this scenario.
Figure 4: Global producers of wheat (a), maize (b), sunflower seed (c) in 2020, and sunflower
oil (d) in 2019 (Source: FAOSTAT)
3.1.4.
Impacts on consumer
The Russian invasion of Ukraine is widely predicted to have substantial impacts on
global health and food security, and indeed already has. Since the war began, wheat prices have
risen over forty percent, to prices not seen since the 2007–2008 World Food Price Crisis
(Macrotrends, 2022). Recent events shed light on what massive devastation by the Russian
military could mean for Ukraine and the world. Ukraine exported $761 million worth of wheat in
2006; by 2019 this had grown to $3.1 billion. Further, maize production for export has grown
even faster in terms of tonnage and economic value and as of 2019 maize was Ukraine’s largest
cereal export at $4.77 billion (AMIS, 2022). While cereal prices have already reacted to the war
in Ukraine, these price hikes are to be understood as anticipatory.
Page | 13
Figure 5: Average global (a) and European (b) prices for commercialization of wheat and maize
during January-March 2022. Data adapted from the Cereal statistic webpage of the European
Commision
3.1.5.
Impacts on food dependent services
Indirect losses to productivity in other countries are also a certainty. Ukraine has
historically been one of the major sources of fertilizers in Europe, accounting for as much as
25% of all fertilizers produced on the continent in 2010 (Gayduk, 2022). The loss of this
production threatens more than the financial value of the fertilizers, but potentially the
productivity of agriculture in other parts of the world (OEC, 2022). Although the UK produces
90% of its wheat on its own, farmers still have to pay more for fertilizer, which is one of Russia's
top export commodities (Jones, 2022). Two-thirds of the ammonium nitrate fertilizers used by
farmers globally is from Russia as pointed out by British Meat Processors' CEO, Nick Allen
(Lanktree, 2022).
3.2.
3.2.1.
Energy crisis in Europe
Dependence on energy imports of Europe
The current state of international relations is closely defined by globalization, the
cooperative and interdependent bonds among state nations (Siddi, 2020). Energy resources act as
a strategic element in international relations, exerting a double-sided effect on energy security.
Nations with limited energy resources majorly respond to domestic demands with the assistance
Page | 14
of energy imports and those with abundant resources gain monetary and diplomatic advantages.
On the other hand, nations reliant on foreign energy suppliers might be vulnerable to potential
risks in international relations which pose challenges to their energy insecurity (Hasan, 2022).
In terms of geographical characteristics, European territories possess restricted deposits
of oil and natural gas which are mainly drilled for energy and fuel. Russia, on the contrary,
encompasses an abundance of natural resources in the world including the largest natural gas
reserves, second largest coal reserves, and eighth largest oil reserves with a proportion of 32%,
14%, and 10% of the world resources respectively (Siddi, 2020). The disproportion of natural
resources partly explains why European countries depend on oil and gas imports from Russia to
meet their domestic demands.
The following graph demonstrates the Euro area energy dependency in which a general
65% of energy sources are imported. It can also be inferred that although a high proportion of
petroleum and natural gas is import products, renewable energy and nuclear energy are mainly
produced domestically (Gunnella et al., 2022).
Figure 6: Energy use by primary fuel type in the euro area (Eurostat, 2019)
In the interdependent relations of energy policy between the European Union and Russia,
transportation infrastructure serves a key role with the capability to provide ‘secure and
interrupted’ routes of energy supply (Borisocheva, 2007). The system of pipelines which acts as
a bridge of energy sources from Russia to Europe comprises 10 routes in total. The most
significant routes include Blue Stream, Nord Stream, and Nord Stream II. The Node Stream
pipeline allows direct gas transportation for Western Europe markets including Germany, France,
Denmark, the United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. The Blue Stream delivers gas flows to
Turkey, bypassing transit countries including Ukraine corridors (Borisocheva, 2007).
3.2.2.
Primary energy sources
Petroleum-based products and natural gas account for the largest consumption in Europe,
occupying key roles in the energy market. Petroleum is the most consumed resource in the
transportation sector, while natural gas is responsible for the consumption in industrial
manufacture, non-transport service, and household usage (Gunnella et al., 2022). Gas also serves
as an instrumental energy source in electrical generation due to the flexibility of gas-fired power
Page | 15
plants and gas infrastructure including network interconnections, storage capacity, and liquified
natural gas terminals (Gunnella et al., 2022).
Figure 7: Energy dependency by primary fuel type in the euro area (Eurostat, 2023)
As per many estimates, Russian natural gas fulfills approximately forty-three percent of
Western Europe’s energy demand (Hasan, 2022). In addition to natural gas, Russia’s oil exports
also play a significant part in this regard. As of 2021, Russian oil accounted for 10% of Europe’s
total demand. Amongst the European states, the EU member states are the most reliant on
Russian energy resources. Specifically, Germany derives more than fifty percent of its natural
gas and 30% of its crude oil supplies from Russia (Hasan, 2022).
3.2.3. Fallout of Russia-Ukraine War
Energy costs have significantly risen as a result of the conflict in Ukraine, and energy
markets have experienced severe instability. Prices have varied, particularly as markets have
attempted to analyze the potential ramifications for global energy supply, amid concerns of
disruptions to energy supplies and increasingly harsh sanctions on the Russian energy sector
(Adolfsen et al., 2022). The energy markets in the euro region have been particularly impacted
because they were so heavily dependent on Russian supply prior to the invasion.
Figure 8: Energy prices before and after the invasion of Ukraine (Refinitiv, 2022)
Page | 16
Following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, prices for oil, coal, and gas skyrocketed and
have been unstable ever since. Russian energy supply constraints could have an impact on both
direct deliveries and global market prices in the euro region (Adolfsen et al., 2022). The two
biggest gas consumers in the eurozone, Germany and Italy, are dependent on Russian gas to the
greatest extent. Any examination of the economic ramifications of the struggle for energy prices
and supply in the euro area must take into account the degree of substitutability of different
energy sources (Adolfsen et al., 2022).
3.3. Impacts on the inflation rate
3.3.1.
Impacts in the UK
The Bank of England has raised UK interest rates by a quarter of a percentage point to
4.5 per cent – the highest level since 2008. It’s an attempt to lower the country’s inflation, which
remains in the double digits, at 10.1 per cent as of March in 2023. That's more than five times the
Bank of England's 2 percent inflation target and a higher rate than in any other major European
economy. The inflation rate in the UK has been affected more severely than most EU countries
for certain reasons. (Khatsenkova, 2023)
According to the BBC, while most major economies have recovered from the labor
shortages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the UK still has about 400,000 more people not
working than in December 2019. This is due to two reasons. There is a very high level of
regional income inequality across the UK. Living in London is more expensive than living in
most of the rest of the country, making it quite difficult for people to move to places with more
economic activity. Even though non-EU immigration to the UK has increased, these workers
may not possess the same level of skills. Overall, it turns out to be a less well-functioning labor
market creating bottlenecks and the necessity for increasing wages, hence driving inflation.
(Jacob Kirkegaard, 2023)
The UK also has its own challenges – Brexit in particular. The war in Ukraine and the
pandemic have masked the fact that Brexit has increased the cost of importing goods from
Europe and has reduced the pound’s purchasing power. Furthermore, the gap in the labor market
caused by reduced inward migration from the EU has yet to be filled by additional domestic
labor or by a significant increase in non-EU migration. Provisional data from the Office for
National Statistics on ‘long-term’ migration show that non-EU inward migration increased from
224,000 in Q2 2020 to 251,000 in Q2 2021. However, this is not enough to make up for reduced
EU migration, which declined from 281,000 in Q2 2020 to 181,000 in Q2 2021. The resulting
labor gap has reduced output, particularly in agriculture and hospitality, and increased wage costs
for companies, contributing to rising inflation. (Jacob Kirkegaard, 2023)
The UK imports much of its food from France and southern Europe, which are also under
pressure from global price rises. The price of wheat – a major Ukrainian export – has risen 40
per cent since the start of the war. Cost-push inflation in those regions relating to the Ukraine
crisis has had a knock-on effect on UK prices. Another important factor, affecting all European
countries, is the supply squeeze caused by continued COVID-19-related restrictions in China,
and pent-up consumer demand from the earlier stages of the pandemic, which has been an added
‘pull’ factor for prices. (David Lawrence, 2022)
Page | 17
Figure 9: Inflation rate among G7 members, April 2022 (Source: Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales (2022)
Moreover, Russia accounts for a much larger share of global commodity supply. Ukraine
is also a major supplier of agricultural commodities. Global oil prices have increased by 11% and
UK wholesale gas prices have increased by 40% since the invasion. In March, UK consumer
confidence fell to its lowest level since November 2020. Much will depend on the course of the
conflict and the evolution of sanctions. But in all probability, it will intensify and prolong the
surge in inflation and tighten the squeeze on household incomes. The consequent drop in demand
through household consumption and business investment will, to an extent not yet clear, be
greater than we thought in February. And there are also likely to be additional impacts on the
supply side of the economy. The impact, as we have seen over the past few months, will come
primarily through commodity prices. The Russian economy itself is only a small part, around
3%, of the global economy. For UK trade, it accounts for less than 1% of the world market. The
Ukrainian economy is still smaller. Russia and Ukraine’s financial links with the UK are
relatively small. But Russia accounts for a much larger share of global commodity supply. This
is most apparent in energy – oil, gas and coal. It is true also for industrial metals, fertilizers and
agricultural commodities. Ukraine is also a major supplier of the latter. We have already started
to see some of the effects on commodity prices, including for energy and food. Global oil prices
have increased by 11% and UK wholesale gas prices have increased by 40% since the invasion
(figure 10 and 11) (Jon Cunliffe, 2022)
Figure 10: Global oil prices have risen by 50% since the start of this year and by 20% since the
Russian invasion Brent crude oil prices in 2022 (a) (Source: Bloomberg)
(a) The chart shows the percentage change in the Brent crude oil price per barrel in dollars since
the first trading day of 2022. Key events labeled. Latest data close 31 March.
Page | 18
Figure 11: UK gas prices have been extremely volatile since the Russian invasion UK natural
gas prices in 2022 (a) (Source: Bloomberg)
(a) The chart shows the percentage change in the spot UK natural gas price per therm in pounds
sterling since the first trading day of 2022. Key events labeled. Latest data close 31 March.
3.3.2.
Impacts in other European Nations
Inflationary Pressure
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has had a significant impact on inflation in EU nations,
primarily through its effect on energy prices and supply chains. The conflict has disrupted the
supply of natural gas and oil, as Russia is a major exporter of these commodities to Europe
(Jones, 2022). Any decline in its exports could result in a global increase in commodity prices.
This, combined with Saudi Arabia's reluctance to release additional oil supplies, contributes to
higher energy prices worldwide. Energy prices have soared, leading to increased production
costs for businesses. Higher energy costs are then passed on to consumers, causing a rise in
prices for goods and services. This increase in inflation reduces consumers' purchasing power
and erodes their real income (Jones, 2022).
Additionally, the supply chain disruptions resulting from the conflict have further
contributed to inflationary pressures (Thomas & Strupczewski, 2022). Disruptions in
transportation and logistics have caused delays in the delivery of goods, leading to shortages and
higher prices. As a result, businesses face higher costs for raw materials and intermediate goods,
which are ultimately passed on to consumers.
To address the mounting inflationary pressures, central banks may respond by adjusting
monetary policy, particularly interest rates. It is possible that the Monetary Policy Committee
(MPC) may choose a cautious approach, raising interest rates gradually and by a smaller
magnitude than predicted by simulations (Iana Liadze, Corrado Macchiarelli et al.). This prudent
response is driven by ongoing uncertainty and the potential risk of a recession. However, this
approach carries the risk of not adequately addressing the inflationary peak, potentially leading
to even higher inflation rates. The timing and magnitude of interest rate adjustments must be
carefully calibrated to avoid negatively impacting economic growth.
The uncertainty surrounding the conflict has also affected consumer and investor
confidence (Thomas & Strupczewski, 2022). Uncertainty about the future has a dampening effect
on consumption and investment, as individuals and businesses become cautious and hesitant to
spend or make long-term commitments. This decline in economic activity can exacerbate
Page | 19
inflationary pressures, as businesses may attempt to compensate for higher costs by raising
prices.
Changes in inflation rate of EU nations during Ukraine - Russia war
Prior to the Ukraine-Russia conflict, EU member states experienced relatively stable
inflation rates. Between January 2012 and August 2021, the inflation rate remained below three
percent, indicating a period of low inflation. This period of stability allowed for sustained
economic growth and price stability within the Eurozone.
Figure 12. Year-over-year change in harmonized index of consumer price (Source: Eurostat
by The New York Times)
In 2022, the annual inflation rate reached a record level of 8.4%, primarily due to
disruptions in the global supply chain and the energy crisis triggered by the conflict. (Mbah &
Wasum, 2022 & Ethan Ilzetzki, 2023). However, there are indications that inflation rates may
slow down in 2023.A decrease in raw material prices suggests a potential slowdown in inflation.
After peaking at 10.6% in October 2022, the most recent data in January showed a decrease to
8.5% (Eurostat, 2023). It is worth noting that the inflation rate in the EU in October 2022 was
higher than at any other time in recent years. The peak prior to 2021 was observed in July 2008
when prices were growing by 4.4 percent on a year-on-year basis. Before the recent surge in
inflation, the EU had managed to maintain relatively low levels of price increases, with the
inflation rate remaining below three percent between January 2012 and August 2021 (Eurostat,
2023).
The fall in raw material prices, particularly in food, living, and energy costs, which
contribute significantly to the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices, could contribute to a
slower rise in prices (Gregory Gadzinski, 2022). If tensions in these volatile markets remain
under control, the baseline effect in the coming months is expected to be more favorable, leading
to a potential decrease in global inflation. However, it is important to note that the global
economy remains vulnerable to unpredictable geopolitical shocks, which could disrupt the
inflationary trend and push inflation rates higher once again.
Page | 20
Figure 13: Annual inflation rate in Europe in March 2023, by country (Source: Eurostat)
In March 2023, the European Union (EU) witnessed an inflation rate of eight percent,
signifying an overall increase in prices across member states. Among these nations, Hungary
experienced the highest inflation rate, reaching a notable 25.6 percent, indicating a significant
surge in prices (Eurostat, 2023). Conversely, Luxembourg boasted the lowest inflation rate in the
EU during that month, standing at a comparatively modest 2.9 percent (Eurostat, 2023). These
variations highlight the diverse inflationary pressures faced by different EU member states
Inflation Forecasts and Economic Growth
Inflation in the European Union (EU) reached a record high of 10.6% in October 2022
but showed signs of moderation, declining to 8.5% by January 2023 (Gregory Gadzinski, 2022).
The European Commission's Winter 2023 Economic Forecast revised its inflation projections
downwards, expecting inflation to settle at 6.4% in 2023 and further decrease to 2.8% in 2024
(Ethan Ilzetzki, Suryaansh Jain, 2023). Additionally, the 5-year, 5-year inflation-linked swap for
the EU, a measure of long-term inflation expectations, remained relatively stable around 2.3%,
indicating that long-term expectations remained anchored. According to the European Central
Bank's (ECB) recent report, consumer forecasts for the current year indicate an inflation rate of
5.0% (Gregory Gadzinski, 2022). The ECB Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) aligned
with these forecasts, with experts revising their inflation expectations to 5.9% for 2023 and 2.7%
for 2024 (Ethan Ilzetzki, Suryaansh Jain, 2023). These indicators align with the ECB's
objectives, suggesting that inflation expectations in the medium term are within an acceptable
range. Major financial institutions, including Bloomberg, Credit Suisse, and Goldman Sachs,
agreed that headline inflation in the EU has likely peaked, but core inflation may persist at
elevated levels in the near term. While core inflation is predicted to slow down to 3.3% by the
end of the year, upward pressure on services inflation is expected due to rising labor costs
(Gregory Gadzinski, 2022) . However, the pace of inflation moderation may vary across EU
nations, posing challenges for a unified monetary policy. The European Central Bank (ECB)
highlighted several inflation risks, such as potential increases in gas prices due to geopolitical
tensions and demand from a post-lockdown China, as well as higher-than-anticipated wage
pressure resulting from a tight labor market (Ethan Ilzetzki, Suryaansh Jain, 2023). Maintaining
Page | 21
trust in the ECB is essential, as individuals with higher inflation perceptions and financial
difficulties tend to have lower levels of trust, which can hinder the effectiveness of monetary
policies. Therefore, the ECB aims to reduce inflation swiftly to restore trust and ensure the
efficacy of its policies (Ethan Ilzetzki, Suryaansh Jain, 2023).
Figure 14: Inflation outlook in the euro area (Source: European Commission Winter 2023
Economic Forecast)
4. How is the EU dealing with the crisis?
The Russia-Ukraine conflict has further highlighted the interdependence and
vulnerability of European countries in terms of energy security.
To mitigate the energy crisis and reduce dependency on Russian energy resources,
Europe is exploring alternatives to ensure energy security and affordability, European countries
are now exploring alternatives to diversify their energy sources.
The European Union (EU) is tackling the challenge of energy insecurity through two
critical approaches: domestic emphasis on enhancing renewable energy sources and international
focus on developing relations with Middle Eastern and other European nations for alternative
energy supply. Here is an overview of the EU member states' efforts to address these issues:
● REPowEU program: EU's initiative to save energy, produce clean energy, and diversify
energy supplies, This plan aims to enable around 85% of European citizens to reduce
their reliance on Russian gas, oil, and coal. The focus is on seeking new avenues for
clean energy and establishing new energy contracts with other states. (European
Commission, 2022)
● Gas reduction plan: EU member states working on reducing gas consumption through
voluntary fuel switching, temperature limits, and awareness campaigns, ensuring
implementation through public-private partnerships.. It involves public-private
partnerships to ensure implementation and is seen as a significant step towards curbing
the energy crisis. scale. An EU official declared the plan as a clear sign to Putin that the
European Union and its citizens were still standing undivided and strong despite Putin’s
intention to divide them. (Jorge Liboreiro, 2022)
● Gas deals with other states: EU consulting with the United States, Qatar, and Norway for
long-term energy deals to guarantee a steady supply, reduce vulnerability, and
compensate for Russian gas cuts.The US has agreed to provide extra liquefied natural gas
Page | 22
(LNG) to the EU, while Norway, as a reliable energy partner, vows to boost its natural
gas production by over 8% in order to cater the needs of Europeans. Upon the matter,
Andreas Erikson, who is serving as the “Secretary in Petroleum and Energy Ministry”,
Norway, asserted that “Norway is a reliable, trustworthy and long-term energy partner for
Europe.” (Helen Regan CNN Hafsa Khalil, Jeevan Ravindran, Aditi Sangal, Adrienne
Vogt, 2022).The EU has also negotiated gas supply deals with Qatar, Azerbaijan, and
other countries.
● Emphasis on renewable energy: EU actively developing its renewable energy sector as a
long-term energy security strategy, seeking sustainable alternatives to Russian gas.
→ Overall, the EU's approach involves diversifying energy sources, reducing dependency on
Russian energy, and promoting clean and renewable energy to enhance energy security
domestically and internationally.
4.1.
Improving food resilience against the Russia-Ukraine conflict
The global food system has faced multiple unprecedented threats and supply-chain
interruptions in recent years, including COVID-19, locust plagues and climate extremes
(Laborde et al., 2021; Salih et al., 2020). With a food system already under pressure and food
insecurity rising even before COVID-19, the Russia–Ukraine conflict has caused a further shock,
resulting in record food price increases. Russia and Ukraine are important producers and
exporters of barley, wheat, maize, sunflower seed and rapeseed (Lang and McKee, 2022).
Together they supplied 64% and 28% of global sunflower oil and wheat exports, respectively, in
2021. In addition, Russia is a major producer and exporter of fertilizer, accounting for almost
20% of global fertilizer exports in 2021 (FAO, 2022)e
Ukraine is often described as the European Union’s breadbasket, and the European Union
is heavily exposed to this conflict-driven food shock. Recent work estimates that a 50% grain
export reduction from Russia and no Ukrainian exports would increase prices by 4.6% and 7.2%
for maize and wheat, respectively (Sandström et al., 2022). In May 2022, the International Food
Policy Research Institute estimated that over 20 countries have implemented food export bans as
a response (Why banning food exports does not work, 2022). In March 2022, the European
Union aimed to address these emerging pressures by preparing a €500 million package of
support for farmers affected by high costs of inputs such as energy and fertilizers, or trade
restrictions due to the Russia–Ukraine conflict
In March 2022, the European Union aimed to address these emerging pressures by
preparing a €500 million package of support for farmers affected by high costs of inputs such as
energy and fertilizers, or trade restrictions due to the Russia–Ukraine conflict (European
Commission, 2022)..
Here we show that such a move across the European Union and the United Kingdom
could also help improve resilience in terms of the capacity to recover from difficulties such as
food insecurity driven by the Russia–Ukraine conflict, and that it is possible to harness numerous
environmental benefits while filling the gap in overall Ukraine and Russia (UA + RU) crop
production for both domestic consumption and exports via EU + UK dietary change to a
planetary health diet (based on EAT-Lancet Commission guidance).
Page | 23
Figure 15: Crop change due to dietary change in the European Union and the United Kingdom
and total production of crops in Ukraine and Russia. (Source: Nature Food)
Dietary change drives both direct and indirect effects: direct via the direct reduction in
consumption of some food types and indirect via the feed used for animal products that are
subsequently consumed. The crosses indicate the net change relative to exports, and the circles
relative to production.
Dietary change from current diets to the EAT-Lancet diet would not only benefit
planetary and human health but could also help absorb interruptions in the international food
supply. Such a dietary shift in the European Union and the United Kingdom can fill the gap in
UA + RU crop production while reducing fertilizer use, water consumption and GHG emissions,
and increasing carbon sequestration.
Page | 24
Figure 16: Per-capita changes in net blue water consumption, net GHG emissions and net
carbon sequestration due to dietary change in the European Union and the United Kingdom
after replacing all UA + RU crops (S2).
a–c, Per-capita changes in net blue water consumption (a), net GHG emissions (b) and net
carbon sequestration (the sum of AGBC, BGBC and SOC) (c). All maps are shown in Robinson
projection. (Source: Nature Food)
Methods:
● Dietary change in EU + UK countries: To model dietary change across the European
Union and the United Kingdom, we used the difference between average national diets
derived from FAO food balance sheets (FBSs) and the EAT-Lancet diet per person per
day scaled by population in the year 2010.
Page | 25
● EMERIO model: We used a consistent, balanced, physical input–output database—the
Food and Agriculture Biomass Input–Output model (FABIO)—including 192 countries
and regions and 128 agriculture, food and forestry products in the year 2010 for this
study (Bruckner et al., 2019).
● Blue water: Blue water measures the consumption of freshwater (surface and
groundwater) (Mekonnen and Hoekstra, 2011).
● Fertilizers: The International Fertilizer Association provides nitrogen, phosphate and
potash fertilizer estimates for 13 crop groups and 28 countries or regions in 2010 (Hefer,
2013).
● GHG emissions: The GHG emissions for agricultural production in tonnes of CO2e yr−1
were calculated following the tier 1 methodology of FAOSTAT (in GWP100) for 2010
and applied at the national level rather than the grid cell level (Sun et al., 2022).
4.2. Energy transition
Energy transition - way towards a more sustainable and self-reliant world
In addition to signing gas deals with other states, EU members are also seeking
opportunities of energy transition. Basically, energy transition refers to the process of shifting
from one mode of energy consumption to the other. Currently, the energy transition is related to
the shift from fossil fuels to low-carbon and renewable energy sources. Rapid climate change has
facilitated the process of energy transition. States all around the world are now considering new
sources of energy supply that are sustainable and environmentally-efficient:
Germany has accelerated its wind and solar energy projects, with the aim of meeting 80%
of its energy demand from these sources in the coming decade. Germany has committed to
achieving 100% energy transition to renewables by 2035. France has announced plans to
construct fourteen nuclear reactors to meet domestic energy demand and reduce reliance on
Russian energy sources. Norway and the EU have strengthened green cooperation, with
Norwegian companies providing expertise in wind and solar power projects to EU member
states. In the case of the UK, the prime minister, Boris Johnson, pledged to bring about an energy
transition to renewable energy sources in the UK. (Mark Thompson Business CNN, 2022) By the
year 2035, the United Kingdom aims at acquiring over 78% of its energy supply from renewable
energy sources.
Renewable resources have emerged as a new ray of hope in these critical times. In terms
of sustainability, these resources are abundant and also climate friendly. The carbon print as a
result of their usage is significantly low which is clearly a plus point for a region that leads
climate
sustainability
initiatives.
However,
the
nuclear
energy,
although
environmentally-friendly, is considered hazardous due to the chances of accident and wide-scale
destruction they can cause. The European Union has been divided on opinions regarding the
usage of nuclear energy. Moreover, in terms of financial expenditure, renewable energy sources
are costly and setting them up is quite time-consuming. In long-term results, they can be quite
beneficial. Nevertheless, for fulfilling the immediate energy demands of the EU, they are not the
ideal option (John Perkis, 2017).
Page | 26
Conclusion
The onset of the Russia-Ukraine crisis alarmed the entire world due to the deteriorating
potential consequences it could’ve had on the entire world. The contemporary international
system is dominated by the phenomena of globalization under which interdependency prevails.
Due to this, any happening in one part of the world impacts other parts of the world as well.
Globalization resulted in collaboration between states. Global trade facilitated the states to sell
products that they had to countries who lacked them. But simultaneously, it enhanced the
vulnerability of the international system by making states increasingly dependent on one another.
Such grave consequences are being observed currently. Russia is utilizing energy resources as a
maneuvering tool against the EU that is majorly reliant on Russian gas to meet their energy
demands. This triggered energy insecurity amongst the EU states. Energy crisis further fueled
economic instability, social turmoil, poverty, unemployment, hike in prices of products of daily
use etc (Hasan, 2022).
In conclusion, the Russia-Ukraine war has had profound and far-reaching impacts on the
inflation rate in Europe. The conflict, marked by geopolitical tensions and economic
uncertainties, has significantly influenced energy prices, disrupted trade flows, and undermined
investor confidence. Throughout this report, we have examined the various channels through
which the war has affected inflation in Europe, acknowledging its implications for energy
security, trade disruptions, and financial market volatility. The disruption in energy supplies,
particularly natural gas, stemming from the conflict has been a critical driver of inflationary
pressures in Europe. Europe's reliance on Russian gas has left the region vulnerable to price
shocks and supply disruptions. The war has magnified these vulnerabilities, leading to increased
energy prices and reduced availability. As a response, the EU has taken commendable steps to
diversify its energy sources through initiatives like the REPowEU program, seeking sustainable
alternatives to Russian gas. These efforts are essential for mitigating the impacts of future
conflicts on energy security and inflation.
Moreover, trade disruptions caused by the conflict have further contributed to inflationary
pressures. The war has disrupted transportation routes and created uncertainties in cross-border
trade, resulting in higher import costs for goods. This increased cost has been passed on to
consumers, exacerbating inflation. Enhancing trade diversification and strengthening regional
cooperation, both within and outside of Europe, can serve as valuable lessons to mitigate the
impact of trade disruptions on inflation in the face of geopolitical conflicts. Additionally, the
geopolitical tensions arising from the war have affected investor confidence and financial
markets. Heightened risk perceptions and uncertainties surrounding the conflict have led to
increased volatility, hampering investment and economic growth. The lessons learned from this
experience emphasize the importance of maintaining stability and enhancing resilience in
financial markets during times of geopolitical turmoil. Robust regulatory frameworks,
transparent communication, and coordinated policy responses can help mitigate the impacts of
such conflicts on investor confidence and overall economic stability. As policymakers and
stakeholders assess the impacts of the Russia-Ukraine war on inflation in Europe, several crucial
lessons emerge. Firstly, energy diversification and resilience should be prioritized to reduce
dependence on a single supplier and minimize the vulnerability of energy shocks. Secondly,
trade diversification and stronger regional cooperation can help mitigate the disruptions caused
by conflicts and minimize their impact on inflation. Finally, maintaining stability and enhancing
Page | 27
transparency in financial markets is essential for fostering investor confidence and limiting the
economic fallout during geopolitical crises.
In conclusion, the Russia-Ukraine war has left a significant imprint on the inflation rate
in Europe. The disruptions in energy supplies, trade flows, and investor confidence have all
contributed to inflationary pressures. By drawing lessons from this experience and implementing
effective strategies, European policymakers can better safeguard energy security, enhance trade
diversification, and maintain stability in financial markets. These efforts will play a crucial role
in mitigating the long-term impacts of geopolitical conflicts on inflation and ensuring the overall
economic well-being of the European region.
Page | 28
References
Adolfsen, J.F. (2022) The impact of the war in Ukraine on euro area energy markets. Available
at:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/focus/2022/html/ecb.ebbox202204_01~68
ef3c3dc6.en.html.
Bank, E.C. (2022). Monetary policy decisions. www.ecb.europa.eu. [online] Available at:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2022/html/ecb.mp221215~f3461d7b6e.en.html
Barklie, G. The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on Trade. Available online:
https://www.investmentmonitor.ai/special-focus/ukraine-crisis/ukraine-russia-conflict-impact
-trade
Basdekis, C. et al. (2022) “The Impact of the Ukrainian War on Stock and Energy Markets: A
Wavelet Coherence Analysis,” Energies, 15(21), p. 8174. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218174.
Borisocheva, K. (2007) “Analysis of the Oil- and Gas-Pipeline-Links between EU and Russia,”
An Account of Intrinsic Interests [Preprint].
Borrell, J. Food Insecurity: The Time to Act Is Now. Available online:
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/food-insecurity-time- act-now_en
Bruckner, M. et al. FABIO—the construction of the Food and Agriculture Biomass Input–Output
Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 11302–11312 (2019).
Das, K.B. Ukraine: Stand-of Threatens Europe Breadbasket. Int. J. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3, 375.
David Lawrence. (2023). UK trade and the war in Ukraine
Decision of the Board of Directors of the Bank of Russia of April 1, 2022
Destatis. Diesel Fuel Prices Averaged 2.16 Euros per Litre on 20 March 2022. Available online:
https://www.destatis.de/EN/ Press/2022/03/PE22_132_611.html
DoD. (2023). Biden Administration Announces Additional Security Assistance for Ukraine.
[online] U.S. Department of Defense. Available at:
https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3308633/biden-administration-anno
unces-additional-security-assistance-for-ukraine/.
Energy, E.C. (2023). Quarterly reports confirm stabilising gas and electricity markets at the end
of 2022. [online] energy.ec.europa.eu. Available at:
https://energy.ec.europa.eu/news/quarterly-reports-confirm-stabilising-gas-and-electricity-ma
rkets-end-2022-2023-05-17_en
EURACTIV. In Spain, Soaring Prices Fuel Growing Social Unrest. Available online:
https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/in-spain-soaring-prices-fuel-growing-social-u
nrest/
Europe’s energy crisis conundrum (2022). Available at:
https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/europes-energy-crisis-conundrum.
Europe: Resources (no date). Available at:
https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/europe-resources/.
European Commission. (2022), “REPowerEU: A Plan to Rapidly Reduce Dependence on
Russian Fossil Fuels and Fast Forward the Green Transition,”
European Commission. Agri-Food Trade Statistical Factsheet-European Union -Ukraine.
Available online:
Page | 29
https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/food-farming-fisheries/farming/documents/agrifoo
d-ukraine_en.pdf
European Commission. EU sanctions against Russia following the invasion of Ukraine.
Available online:
https://eu-solidarity-ukraine.ec.europa.eu/eu-sanctions-against-russia-following-invasion-ukr
aine_en#sanctioning-disinformation-actors
European Commission: Safeguarding Food Security and Reinforcing the Resilience of Food
Systems. Available online:
https://rea.ec.europa.eu/publications/safeguarding-food-security-and-reinforcing-resilience-fo
od-systems_en
European Commission. Trade Monitoring through Customs Surveillance Data. Available online:
https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/8df1b7d8-1098-42b3-b29b-366d9c77192e/OILSEEDS%20TA
XUD_Surv.pdf
Executive Summary (no date) The importance of Ukraine and the Russian Federation for global
agricultural markets and the risks associated with the current conflict, Fao.org. Available at:
https://www.fao.org/3/cb9236en/cb9236en.pdf
FAO (2022). FAO Food Price Index | World Food Situation | Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations. [online] www.fao.org. Available at:
https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/
FAO. FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC
FAO. Note on the Impact of the War on Food Security in Ukraine; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2022.
Federal Law No. 55-FZ of March 14, 2022.
Federal Law No. 55-FZ of March 14, 2022.
Frick, W. (2022). What Causes Inflation? [online] Harvard Business Review. Available at:
https://hbr.org/2022/12/what-causes-inflation.
Gallagher, I. Key Port at Odessa Is Blasted by 50 Cruise Missiles as Russia Moves to Cut
Ukraine off from Overseas Trade. Available online:
https://opera.news/za/en/military/cd987d5514de2f78b12b07933654ce92
Graham, N.; Pe’er, I. Putin’s Invasion of Ukraine Threatens a Global Wheat Crisis. Available
online:
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/econographics/putins-invasion-of-ukraine-could-sparka-global-food-crisis/
Gunnella, V. (2022) Natural gas dependence and risks to activity in the euro area. Available at:
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/economic-bulletin/focus/2022/html/ecb.ebbox202201_04~63
d8786255.en.html.
Hasan, Y. (2022) “Russia-Ukraine Crisis and Energy Insecurity: Is energy transition a sustainable
alternate?,” Russia-Ukraine Crisis and Energy Insecurity: Is Energy Transition a
Sustainable Alternate?, 3(1), pp. 30–46. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.59111/jpd.003.01.016.
Hefer, P. Assessment of Fertilizer Use by Crop at the Global Level (International Fertilizer
Association, 2013).
Helen Regan, Hafsa Khalil, Jeevan Ravindran, Aditi Sangal, Adrienne Vogt, CNN (2022)
“Norway to Step up Cooperation with EU to Ensure Additional Gas Supplies,”
IGC. Grain Market Report. Available online: https://www.igc.int/en/gmr_summary.aspx
John Cunliffe. (2022, April 04). Monetary and financial stability and the invasion of Ukraine
Page | 30
Jorge Liboreiro (2022) “All You Need to Know about the EU’s 15% Gas Reduction Plan,”
https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/07/27/winter-is-coming-all-you-need-to-know-a
bout-the-eus-15- gas-reduction-plan.
Khatsenkova, S. (2023) “Fact-check: Why is inflation higher in the UK than in the EU?,”
Euronews, 12 May. Available at:
https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/05/12/fact-check-why-is-inflation-higher-in-the-uk-tha
n-in-the-eu#:~:text=Gas%20prices,efficiency%20of%20its%20housing%20stock.
Lang, T. & McKee, M. The reinvasion of Ukraine threatens global food supplies. Brit. Med. J.
376, 0676 (2022).
Jason Fernando (2023, May 10). “Inflation: what it is, how it can be controlled, and extreme
examples”: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inflation.asp
Lavie, D. (2022) “How To Calculate Inflation: PCE & CPI,” Forbes Advisor, 13 October.
Available at: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/how-to-calculate-inflation/
Mbah, R. E., & Wasum, D. F. (2022). Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A Review of the Economic
Impact of Russian-Ukraine Crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe:
https://journals.scholarpublishing.org/index.php/ASSRJ/article/view/1200
Mekonnen, M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived
crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15, 1577–1600 (2011).
National Institute of Economic and Social Research Policy Paper no. 32. The Economic Costs of
the Russia - Ukraine Conflict by Iana Liadze, Corrado Macchiarelli, Paul Mortimer-Lee,
Patricia Sanchez Juanino.Available online:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/twec.13336
Polityuk, P. and Hunder, M. (2022). Russian gas cut to Europe hits economic hopes after Ukraine
grain deal. Reuters. [online] 26 Jul. Available at:
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-works-resume-grain-exports-flags-russian-stri
kes-risk-2022-07-25/
Putsenteilo, P.; Klapkiv, Y.; Kostetskyi, Y. Modern Challenges of Agrarian Business in Ukraine
on the Way to Europe. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Scientific Conference
‘Economic Sciences for Agribusiness and Rural Economy’, Warsaw, Poland, 7–8 June 2018;
pp. 250–258.
Race, B. M. (2023, March 22). Why is UK inflation higher than other countries? BBC News
Ray, Michael. "Russia-Ukraine War". Encyclopedia Britannica, 3 June. 2023. Available online:
https://www.britannica.com/event/2022-Russian-invasion-of-Ukraine
Reserve Bank Of Australia (2023). Causes of Inflation. [online] Reserve Bank of Australia.
Available at: https://www.rba.gov.au/education/resources/explainers/causes-of-inflation.html.‌
Reuters (2022). Factbox: Western financial sanctions on Russia. Reuters. [online] 13 May.
Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/western-financial-sanctions-russia-2022-05-13/
Russian Government’s Order No. 430-r of March 5, 2022.
Russian Government’s Regulation No. 299 of March 6, 2022.
Russian President’s Decree No. 126 of March 18, 2022.
Russian President’s Decree No. 172 of March 31, 2022.
Russian President’s Decree No. 81 of March 1, 2022.
Russian President’s Decree No. 95 of March 5, 2022.
Salih, A. A., Baraibar, M., Mwangi, K. K. & Artan, G. Climate change and locust outbreak in
East Africa. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 584–585 (2020).
Page | 31
Sandström, V. et al. Food system by-products upcycled in livestock and aquaculture feeds can
increase global food supply. Nat. Food 3, 729–740 (2022).
Santander. (2022, April 12). Ukraine´s war impact in the UK economy and financial system.
Siddi, M. (2020) “EU-Russia Energy Relations,” in Springer eBooks, pp. 1–25. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73526-9_54-1.
Sun, Z. et al. Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate
dividend. Nat. Food 3, 29–37 (2022).
Sun, Z., Scherer, L., Zhang, Q., & Behrens, P. (2022). Adoption of plant-based diets across
Europe can improve food resilience against the Russia–Ukraine conflict. Nature Food, 3(11),
905-910. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00634-4
The Economist (2022) “Why banning food exports does not work,” The Economist, 19 July.
Available at:
https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2022/05/25/why-banning-food-exports-d
oes-not-work.
Page | 32