MICROECONOMICS 2 THEORY OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR LECTURE 1 & 2 Outline Introduction to consumer’s problem Utility Maximization Problem Expenditure Minimization Problem Building blocks in the model of consumer’s problem Consumption Set Feasible Set ( ⟹ Budget Set) Consumer Preferences and Binary Relation ( ⟹ Preference Relation) Preference Axiom Preference axioms and Preference Relation Rationality Lexicographic Orderings Utility function Existence of Utility Function Invariance of the Utility Function Properties of Preferences and Utility Functions Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 2 Economic Model Economic Model of Human Behavior (i.e. Homo Economicus) Simplified representation of reality Model’s power stems from the elimination of irrelevant detail, which allows the economist to focus on the essential features of the economic reality he/she is attempting to understand In microeconomics we are dealing with individual agents on how they make their decision rationally based on their self-interest When Economic Model is valid? Intrumentalism: The power of prediction Realism: The validity of the assumption of the model How to test the validity of an economic model? Empirical or Statistical Other? In this lecture, the goal is to provide you with the theory so that you could understand and explain the behaviour of agents Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 3 Introduction to Consumer’s Problem The Consumer’s Problem Utility Maximization Expenditure Minimization Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 4 Introduction to Consumer’s Problem (Cont’d) The Consumer’s Problem Utility Maximization Expenditure Minimization Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 5 Consumption Set Consumption set, X, represent the set of all alternatives, or complete consumption plans, that the consumer can conceive – whether some of them will be achievable in practice or not. Capture the universe of alternative choices over which the consumer’s mind is capable of wandering, unfettered by consideration of the realities of his present situation. The consumption set is sometimes also called the choice set Usually, we’ll simplify things and just think of the consumption set as the entire non-negative orthant, 𝑋 = ℝ𝑛+ Let x𝑖 ∈ ℝ represent the number of units of good I We assume that only non-negative units of each good are meaningful and that it is always possible to conceive of having no units of any particular commodity. We assume there is a finite, fixed, but arbitrary number n of different goods We let 𝒙 = (𝑥1 , … , 𝑥𝑛 ) be a vector containing different quantities of each of the n commodities and call x a consumption bundle or a consumption plan. A consumption bundle 𝐱 ∈ 𝑋 is thus represented by a point 𝐱 ∈ ℝ𝑛 Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 6 Consumption Set (Cont’d) Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 7 Feasible Set and Budget Set Feasible set B capture those alternatives that are achievable given the economic realities the consumer faces The feasible set B then is that subset of the consumption set X that remains after we have accounted for any constraints on the consumer’s access to commodities due to the practical, institutional, or economic realities of the world We will simply say that B ⊂ X e.g.: time constraints, quota, budget constraint A budget set B is a set of feasible consumption bundles, represented as 𝐵 𝒑, 𝜔 = {𝒙 𝜖 𝑋|𝒑𝒙 ≤ 𝜔} 𝒑 is an n-dimensional positive vector interpreted as price 𝜔 is a positive number interpreted as the consumer’s wealth Properties of Budget Set B Non-empty Closed Bounded Convex Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 8 Consumer Preferences and Binary Relation We represent the consumer’s preferences by a binary relation ≿ defined on the consumption set, X If 𝒙𝟏 ≿ 𝒙𝟐 , we say that ‘𝒙𝟏 is at least as good as 𝒙𝟐 ’, for this consumer We require only that consumers make binary comparisons, that is, that they only examine two consumption plans at a time and make a decision regarding those two. Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 9 Preference Axiom: (1) Completeness & (1a) Reflexive Consumer preferences are characterised axiomatically. In this method of modelling as few assumptions as possible are set forth to characterise the structure and properties of preferences. The rest of the theory then builds logically from these axioms These axioms of consumer choice are intended to give formal mathematical expression to fundamental aspects of consumer behaviour and attitudes towards the objects of choice. ‘Can make a choice’ Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 10 Preference Axiom: (2) Transitivity ‘Consistent’ Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 11 Preference Relation These two axioms together imply that the consumer can completely rank any finite number of elements in the consumption set, X, from best to worst, possibly with some ties. This enable the consumer to construct such a ranking by saying that those preferences can be represented by a preference relation Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 12 Rational Preference Relation Preference relation ≿ is a rational preference ordering if it is complete and transitive However it is not enough to make a well-behaved preference Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 13 Rational Preference Relation Hypothetical preferences satisfying Axioms 1 and 2 Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 14 Trivia Are Axiom 1 and Axiom 2 enough to define a Utility Function? Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 15 Lexicographic Orderings In lexicographic orderings, the preference depends first on the amount of good 1. Good 2 affects the relative ordering of the bundles only if amounts of good 1 are equal in the two bundles Consumer likes good 1 very much that he/she will choose the bundle that offers the most good 1, no matter how much good 2 there is. Only when both bundles have the same units of X will the agent start comparing the number of units of good 2 across bundles 𝑥1 ≿ 𝑥 2 (𝑥11 , 𝑥21 ) ≿ (𝑥12 , 𝑥22 ) if either 𝑥11 > 𝑥12 , or 𝑥11 = 𝑥12 and 𝑥21 ≥ 𝑥22 Maximize first component. In case of tie, maximize second component The lexicographic ordering is a preference relation that is complete and transitive, but does not have utility representation Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 16 Trivia Only rational preference relation can be represented by a utility function. But is it enough to define a utility function? What other axioms are needed to define a utility function? Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 17 Preference Axiom: (3) Continuity ‘No sudden preference reversal’ Hypothetical preferences satisfying Axioms 1, 2, and 3 Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 18 Preference Axiom: (4’) Local Non-Satiation ‘No zones of indifference (thick indifference curve)’ ‘No bliss point’ Hypothetical preferences satisfying Axioms 1, 2, 3 and 4’ Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 19 Preference Axiom: (4) Strict Monotonicity ‘More is better than less’ Weak Monotonicity If bundle 𝑥 has more of every good than bundle 𝑦 then 𝑥 is strictly preferred to 𝑦 𝒙𝒊 > 𝒚𝒊 for every 𝒊 implies 𝒙 ≻ 𝒚 Strict Monotonicity If bundle 𝑥 has more of at least one good and no less of any good than bundle 𝑦 then 𝑥 is strictly preferred to 𝑦 𝒙𝒊 ≥ 𝒚𝒊 for every 𝒊 and 𝒙𝒊 > 𝒚𝒊 for some 𝒊 implies𝒙 ≻ 𝒚 Under monotonicity we can not have upward sloping indifference curve Weak monotonicity implies non-increasing indifference curve while strict monotonicity implies decreasing indifference curve It is also implies that the ‘preferred to’ sets be ‘above’ the indifference sets and that the ‘worse than’ sets be ‘below’ them Strict monotonicity imply local non satiation Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 20 Preference Axiom: (4) Strict Monotonicity (Cont’d) Hypothetical preferences satisfying Axioms 1, 2, 3 and 4 Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 21 Preference Axiom: (5’) Convexity & (5’) Strict Convexity ‘Consumer likes extreme bundles less’ Hypothetical preferences satisfying Axioms 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 22 Preference Axiom: (5’) Convexity & (5’) Strict Convexity Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 23 Utility Function Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 24 Utility Function Concave and convex functions – Supplements: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0dZVmPN3Ww&t=5s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyaeAZEi-iE&t=722s Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 25 Marginal Rate of Substitution MRS measures the rate at which the agent is willing to substitute one good for another MRS diminishes with 𝑥1 if and only if preferences are strictly convex Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 26 Discussion: The Non-Standard Preferences Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 27 Discussion: The Non-Standard Preferences Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 28 Discussion: The Non-Standard Preferences Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior 29 MICROECONOMICS 2: THEORY OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR LECTURE 1 & 2 1. Geoffrey A. Jehle and Philip J. Reny, Advanced Microeconomic Theory, 3rd edition, Prentice Hall, 2011, Essex. (JR) 2. Hal R. Varian, Intermediate Microeconomics, W.W Norton & Company, New York, 2006. (HV2) Ashintya Damayati (Universitas Indonesia) Microeconomics 2: Theory of Consumer Behavior