Pramoedya Ananta Toer, House of Glass (1988) Keyword: colonial order “My failure to get my leave to Europe deepened further my understanding of the colonial order. At the top, colonial power was supported by a small group of white colonial people who in turn were supported by colonial brown people of which there was a greater range of kinds and groups. From the top going down, there were bans, oppression, orders, insults, and abuse. From the bottom going up, there were arse-licking, submission, and slavelike self-abasement. And I had my place in this order. And so anyone who heard my boss’s reply yo my request would just smile. ‘There is so much work to do these days, Meneer. And you are not allowed to have any helpers or any replacement. You must understand, Meneer, that the work you do is new in the Indies.’ Madness! I swore inside while my lips smiled sweetly and politely. Yes, the smile must be sweet and polite, because that is how a subordinate must behave toward his superior, because that is the colonial custom we must honor. He also replied with a smile and I could feel the insult it expressed” (Chapter 8). Here, Pangemanann is seen reflecting on the hierarchical structure of colonial society, discussing the power dynamics inherent between different groups of people. The "colonial order" he talks about is like a set of rules that kept this system in place. In this setup, the top group, mostly white colonial people, had a lot of control. They could make rules, be oppressive, give orders, insult, and even be abusive. On the other side, the brown colonial people, who were more in number, had to deal with these rules, often having to be submissive and act like slaves. Pangemanann's struggle to get permission to go to Europe is an example of how people in this system faced limitations. Smiling politely in a respectful manner was also demanded of individuals pointing to how everyone had to follow certain behaviors set by colonial rules, irrespective of whether the contra reciprocated genuinely. Pangemanann's reflection helps us see how unfair and degrading the colonial system was, where power imbalances and injustices were deeply rooted in society. Kipling, Kim Keyword: identity “This is the great world, and I am only Kim. Who is Kim?” He considered his own identity, a thing he had never done before, till his head swam. He was one insignificant person in all this roaring whirl of India, going southward to he knew not what fate” (Kipling 94). Identity plays an important role and an ongoing theme in Kipling’s text. Being in the diverse and complex atmosphere of British India during the late 19th century, Kim engages with questions of cultural, social, and spiritual identity as he journeys through the streets of Lahore and interacts with people of various, different backgrounds. In this quotation, Kim is seen exploring his identity and what that particularly means for him, given his mixed heritage and the blending of both his Irish and Indian cultures. Although not as direct and apparent in the text, Kim’s identity influences many aspects of his life, including the decisions he makes as well as his perspectives and outlooks on the world. The stratified social structure of the time further heighte tensions in regards to culture and identity. In addition, the spiritual quest alongside a Tibetan Lama introduces a layer of religious identity, while the backdrop of the "Great Game" adds an element of espionage, challenging many conventional notions of identity and what it means to be a spy during this time. In “Man of All Work,” Wright portrays Carl in ways that seem to disrupt societal expectations. Carl challenges traditional gender roles in the story as he is seen consistently rejecting the “male archetype” of the 1960s. Whereas men are primarily the working breadwinners of the family, Carl takes on caregiving responsibilities and acts in ways (like crying) that are typically associated with women, or femininity. A particular moment in the text that shows the disobedient character portrayal of Carl is when, in desperate circumstances, threatened with losing his home and financial support for his family, disguises himself as a female maid, Lucy. In order to be there for his loved ones, he must break the typical stereotypes of a man and his assumed role and position in the household. Carl is seen attending to others’ needs, which again go against how men are perceived to act during this time period. I find it very interesting how Wright employs disobedience within the plots of his storyline and characters, pointing to ways in which literature and writing style is rejected.