GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10609-4 Simulating future intra‑urban land use patterns of a developing city: a case study of Jashore, Bangladesh Syed Riad Morshed · Md. Abdul Fattah · Md. Mojammel Hoque · Md. Razzakul Islam · Fahmida Sultana · Kaniz Fatema · Md. Fazle Rabbi · Asma Amin Rimi · Fahmida Yeasmin Sami · F. M. Rezvi Amin · Musfiqur Rahman Chowdhury Seam · Mehedi Hasan Sizan · Mahamudul Hasan · Md. Nazmul Haque Accepted: 9 February 2022 / Published online: 5 March 2022 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022, corrected publication 2022 Abstract Increasing urban growth at an unprecedented rate entails adverse implications for societal, economic, and environmental sustainability. In the cities of Bangladesh, the land covers are experiencing rapid construction-associated land expansion, population growth, and socioeconomic development. Comprehensive assessment and understanding of the prospects for rapid land use/land cover (LULC) changes are essential for managing land surface resources and ensuring sustainable development. Therefore, this study aims to assess the historical land use/land cover (LULC) changes and simulate future potential intraurban LULC growth patterns of Jashore City up to 2050. We used (i) Landsat images to analyze LULC change using maximum likelihood supervised image classification method; (ii) Markov-CA model to illustrate the LULC transition matrix during 2000–2020, (iii) Multilayer Perception Neural Network Markov Chain (MPNNMC) Model to simulate future LULC patterns. The result shows that built-up area expanded quickly, while cropland and water areas have had a large loss of coverage. The LULC change analysis S. R. Morshed · M. A. Fattah (*) · M. R. Islam · F. Sultana · K. Fatema · M. F. Rabbi · A. A. Rimi · F. Y. Sami · F. M. Rezvi Amin · M. R. C. Seam · M. H. Sizan · M. Hasan · M. N. Haque Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Khulna University of Engineering and Technology, Khulna, Bangladesh e-mail: mafattah.kuet@gmail.com F. Y. Sami e-mail: fahmida.s32@gmail.com S. R. Morshed e-mail: riad.kuet.urp16@gmail.com M. R. Islam e-mail: razzakul152@gmail.com F. Sultana e-mail: fahmiiidatasnim@gmail.com K. Fatema e-mail: kanizfatema1013@gmail.com M. F. Rabbi e-mail: azlerabbi.fearless@gmail.com F. M. Rezvi Amin e-mail: rezviamin.kuet@gmail.com M. R. C. Seam e-mail: musfiqseam@yahoo.com M. H. Sizan e-mail: mehedihasansizan@yahoo.com M. Hasan e-mail: offpvl16@gmail.com M. N. Haque e-mail: nhaque.kuet13@gmail.com M. M. Hoque Department of Civil Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering and Technology, Chattogram, Bangladesh e-mail: hmojammel40@gmail.com A. A. Rimi e-mail: asmaamin97@gmail.com Vol.: (0123456789) 13 426 derived from prior LULC was utilized for future simulations, where natural and anthropogenic factors were chosen as the driving variables in the MPNNMC model. The future LULC modeling shows that compared to 2020, the urban area is expected to increase by 23.64%, whereas cropland, vegetation, unused land, and water areas are expected to reduce by 1.16%, 5.47%, 9.55%, and 7.73% respectively, by 2050. The change analysis shows that urban areas will increase the fastest during 2020–2030. The findings demonstrate that the rapid and unplanned urbanization and the rise of the population due to migration resulted in the fastest LULC transformation. The study findings contribute to the long-term ecological development of Jashore City and potentially enhance environmental decision making. Keywords Urban land cover growth pattern · Land cover modeler · Jashore city · LULC transition Introduction The enormous urbanization of the cities around the world is a global concern that creates challenges and opportunities for long-term sustainability (Gómez et al., 2020). In the last century, continuous urbanization was accomplished under the distinctive influence of population growth, migration, and continued development. The sustainable development of the cities of Bangladesh has mainly been hindered by uncontrolled and unplanned rapid population growth and urbanization (Kafy et al., 2021a). Over the last few decades, the cities in Bangladesh have experienced one of the fastest urbanization rates in the world (Faisal et al. 2021a). Migration of people to urban areas accelerates urban growth and creates problems such as environmental degradation (Kafy et al., 2020), poverty traps (Grant, 2010), informal settlements, air, and noise pollution, fast-spreading disease (Moore et al., 2003), and the economic costs of increasing public infrastructure (Gómez et al., 2020). These phenomena have been observed in the major cities of the country which are emerging as unplanned cities, mostly dominated by overcrowded and haphazard settlements. For sustainable urban planning, environmental and ecological resource management, it is necessary to consider the spatiotemporal changes in urban land use and land cover (LULC) and especially the prediction Vol:. (1234567890) 13 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 of future potential urban growth (Aburasa et al., 2016; Al-Darwish et al., 2018; Bihamta et al., 2015; Feng et al., 2018). Moreover, the complex structure of the LULC pattern must be understood to accurately simulate future urban growth. City provide many opportunities, such as access to basic service facilities, health, financial, entertainment, educational, and employment opportunities with huge wages (Ahrend et al., 2014; Moore et al., 2003). This has significantly accelerated global urbanization over the past few centuries. The urban growth prediction model helps local authorities and policymakers to determine strategies for controlling urban growth and environmental changes and also estimates the investment needed for public infrastructure and sustainable urban development (Maarseveen et al., 2018; Weng, 2012). Many researchers around the globe have indicated the study of urban growth for many developed and developing countries (Aithal et al., 2018; Al-shalabi et al., 2013; Gómez et al., 2020; Herold et al., 2003; Rimal et al., 2018). Cities consume the surrounding lands and areas as they grow. Therefore, urban planners, policymakers, and engineers need to develop methods to assess and simulate future urban growth, regarding the future consequences of LULC, to prevent communities from building in protected or conserved areas or areas vulnerable to hazards. In recent years, several studies have witnessed the rapid urban expansion in both urban and rural areas of Bangladesh. About 809 ­km2 of cropland in Bangladesh is declining (Gazi et al., 2020). According to Rai et al. (2017) the forest land cover area percentage in Bangladesh declined from 15.7% to 9.5% during 1930–2014, beel and haor area increased from 1.66% to 1.72% during 1976–2010, urban area increased from 23.6% to 28.4% during 2000–2011 (Hasan et al. 2013). The average vegetation cover loss was calculated 66.87 k­ m2 between 1989 and 2009. Several studies of LULC change analysis revealed that the waterbody area percentage in the urban areas of Bangladesh declined rapidly (Gazi et al., 2020; Kafy et al., 2020; Morshed et al., 2021) while increased in the rural areas, especially in the southwestern regions due to the shifting of rice field to shrimp farms (Fattah et al., 2021b; Islam et al., 2015; Khan et al., 2015). Bangladesh is a developing country. According to the General Economics Division (2020), Bangladesh GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 will experience a rapid and transformational change in agriculture, education, trade and industry, transportation, healthcare, and communication. The current government aims to reach the title of developed country by 2041, and in this regard, "Perspective Plan 2041" has been adopted. Various infrastructures, such as roads, bridges, offices, buildings, factories, and industries, are being built in the cities and towns of the country, and this has accelerated the urbanization rate throughout the country (Hassan & Nazem, 2016; Shubho & Islam, 2020). Topics related to LULC change, such as simulation of future potential LULC patterns and their consequences, have recently attracted interest from a wide range of literature (Araya & Cabral, 2010; Han et al., 2015; Kafy et al., 2020; Maduako et al., 2016). Though there have been many studies on LULC change and its impact on the contest of the cities of Bangladesh, there have not been sufficient studies on urban growth prediction. Previous studies, related to LULC simulation, have focused on urban growth in Dhaka (Ahmed & Bramley, 2015; Pramanik & Stathakis, 2015; Shubho & Islam, 2020) and Chittagong (Hassan & Nazem, 2016), but the assessment of urban growth patterns and prediction of other cities has not been studied in the previous literature. In this study, we identified the historical urban growth pattern, transformation and direction of the built-up land expansion of Jashore City during 2000 – 2020 to model the future intra-urban land use pattern (FILUP) of 2030, 2040, and 2050. The FILUP modelling is performed by using the natural and anthropogenic variables in the MPNNMC model. The study contributes to the planning and implementation of many short- and long-term development plans for Jashore City and its environs. The simulated spatial complex variation in LULC can assist policymakers and planners in designing sustainable plans for the cities of Bangladesh by providing a holistic understanding of the current scenario in relation to future expansion possibilities and environmental safety. Literature review Urban population increase has had a massive impact on the entire world to date, resulting in massive changes in LULC, which has become a key concern in natural resource management and sustainable 427 development in cities (Al-Hameedi et al. 2021). A large amount of land covers is being transformed and substituted into built-up land for fulfilling the demands of residential, commercial, industrial and other demands (Somvanshi et al., 2020). The term "LULC change" is used to describe how human activities alter the Earth’s terrestrial surface (Gazi et al., 2020). While humans have been altering land for thousands of years to obtain livelihoods and other necessities, the rate, intensity, and extent of LULC transformation are much greater now than they were earlier. These changes are causing unprecedented changes in ecosystems and environmental processes at the local, regional, and global levels (Fattah et. al. 2021b). The study of LULC change is regarded as a significant aspect of observing parameters that are accountable for overall changes (Li et al., 2017; Nath et al., 2018; Tendaupenyu et al., 2016), landscape changes (Li & Liu, 2017; Ying et al., 2017), ecosystem change, landscape fragmentation (Nagendra et al., 2004; Nurwanda et al., 2015), urbanization (Ahmed, 2011), climate change (Morshed & Fattah, 2021), sustainable development (Boadi, et al., 2005), and risk assessment at the city level. Therefore, the effective use and management of land resources is important for sustainable development from environmental and socioeconomic aspects. Currently, GIS and remote sensing technologies can provide advanced, more powerful and accurate tools to aid in better monitoring and understanding the spectral, spatial and temporal characteristics of LULC changes at regional, national and global scales (Hasan and Nazem, 2015). The LULC changes are identified through the image classification process. Image classification is a broad category of digital image processing techniques that involve the automatic grouping of pixels into specified categories (Kafy et al., 2020). The images have been classified by (i) supervised image classification method (SICM) and (ii) unsupervised image classification method (UICM). In SICM, some training pixels are selected from each of the classes in the first step, which is called the training stage. Image classification can be achieved by identifying the characteristics of training pixels and then looking for other pixels with the same features (Hassan & Southworth, 2017). There is no need for a training stage in UICM, but different algorithms are used for clustering. The supervised image classification method is the most popular due Vol.: (0123456789) 13 428 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Fig. 1 Study area map of Jashore City, Bangladesh to more accuracy of image classified data (Hassan et al., 2016; Simwanda et al., 2021). The classification results are influenced by several factors, including the classification goal, the spatial and spectral characteristics of the data, the natural variability of terrain conditions in the geographic area, and the digital classification technique used. The availability of high-quality remotely sensed imagery and ancillary data, the design of a proper classification procedure, and the analysts’ skills and experience are all important factors in the performance of image classification (Gazi, et al., 2020; Hu, et al., 2019). Several models have been introduced to predict LULC change in the GIS environment, such as Cellular Automata (CA) model (Clarke & Hoppen, 1997), Vol:. (1234567890) 13 Land Transformation Model (LTM) (Pijanowski et al., 2014), Conversion of Land Use and its Effects (CLUE) model (Verburg et al., 2006), Weights of Evidence (WE) model (Amato et al., 2014), Logistic Regression Model (Arsanjani et al., 2013), Frequency Ratio (FR) model (Park et al., 2011), Urban Growth Potential (UGP) model (Kong et al., 2012), Fuzzy Logic model (Grekousis et al., 2013), etc. The Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based CA model is the first theoretical model to simulate potential urban growth and develop and increase (i) spatiality, (ii) dynamics, (iii) simplicity, (iv) visualization accuracy, (v) linked macro to micro approaches, and (vi) integrated GIS and remotesensing techniques (Aburasa et al., 2016; Kafy et al., 2021b). The CA model has a high computational GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Table 1 Information about the used Landsat images in the study. Source: USGS, 2020 429 Satellite/sensor Path/row Spectral resolution Resolution Date Cloud coverage LANDSAT 5 LANDSAT 5 LANDSAT 8 30 m < 10% 138/44 138/44 137/44 efficiency and spatial resolution since models of this kind are capable of simulating with the assumption that past urban growth will influence future urbanization patterns based on local land-use interactions (Santé et al., 2010). The main advantages of the CA model are the open scalability of the model structure, its integration with other models, and its ability to simulate both temporal and spatial patterns (Clarke & Hoppen, 1997; He et al., 2008, 2018). In this study, the Multilayer Perception Neural Network Markov Chain (MPNNMC) model was used to simulate future potential urban land use patterns. The ANN consists of a neural network approach to multilayer perceptron (MLP) that decides automatically about network parameters and their changes for an accurate future model (Kafy et al., 2021; Kafy et al., 2021; Kafy, Rakib, et al., 2021). Subedi et al. (2013) and Simwanda et al. (2021) explained the MPNNMC model as the most effective model for simulating future spatiotemporal changes with highprecision LULC transformation. This model is also used to predict future potential environmental and ecological change (Kafy, Rakib, et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2019). Researchers have explained the LULC prediction model as the most reliable and accurate for urban growth prediction in the previous literature as spatial, environmental, and ecological factors and GIS and remote-sensing techniques can be considered in this model (Aburasa et al., 2016; Al-Darwish et al., 2018; Bihamta et al., 2015; He et al., 2018; Kafy et al., 2020). A few researches have conducted the intra-urban LULC simulations in Bangladesh including (Kafy et al., 2020, 2021b; Hoque et al., 2020; Dey et al. 2021) and most them are based on the four major Table 2 Description of selected five LULC types in this study Multispectral (6 Bands) Multispectral (11 Bands) 17/03/2000 06/03/2010 30/03/2020 cities of Bangladesh, likely Dhaka, Chattogram, Khulna and Rajshahi. Previous research in this context has focused on either evaluating the drivers of unplanned growth or monitoring and mapping urban growth. We have considered the study of monitoring and mapping urban growth, urban growth direction analysis, analyzed the drivers of urban growth, identified the future potential urban LULC scenario and future intra-urban LULC growth direction for 2030, 2040, and 2050. Our study will be useful in future master plan projects for Jashore City. Methodology Study area Jashore City, an increasing center of southwestern region of Bangladesh, under Khulna Division (Fig. 1). The city located on the bank of Bhairob river and a major industrialized and commercial center of Jashore District. Jashore district now covers a total area of 2578.20 sq km, with Jashore City covering a total area of 25.72 sq km, and the population was estimated to be around 237,478 which is half of the entire district’s population. The annual rainfall is 1537 mm and the temperature varies from a minimum of 1­ 10C to a maximum of ­370C. Jessore is well-connected to both Bangladesh and India via highways. Jessore is a station on the Western Bangla Railway’s broad-gauge network. The Bangladesh Air Force uses the Jessore airport, which is located near Jessore city. This LULC types Description Built-up/ Urban area Constructive lands, industrial, residential and commercial areas, infrastructures, road network etc Bare soils, playground, unused land, open space, landfill sites Agricultural/ crop land, grasslands Trees, vegetation and forest areas Wetlands, river, canals, ponds and lakes Unused land Crop land Greeneries Water area Vol.: (0123456789) 13 430 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 city’s road transportation system includes rickshaws, automobiles, buses, trucks, and other vehicles (BBS, 2013)(BBS, 2013). Over the past few decades, rise of temperature and steepness in the northwestern part of the country have greatly reduced the crop production. In the last three decades the district’s intercommunication system has been enormously developed. The development project and steepness has been influencing the massive LULC change in the study area. Data collection In this study, remotely sensed Landsat data for a specific period were used to analyze the LULC changes. Three Multi-spectral Landsat images were collected from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for the year 2000, 2010, and 2020 to illustrate the LULC dynamics. These three satellite images collected were taken in the same month (March) to avoid the seasonal effects. Due to less possibility of rainfall in Jashore during March, the accuracy or acceptability of the LST result is higher than in other months. The maximum cloud coverage was set to less than 10% during collecting the images. The detailed information of the images is shown in Table 1. LULC classification LULC classification is one of the key remote sensing applications to identify the characteristics of land use by using multispectral satellite imagery. Remotely sensed images are classified by supervised and unsupervised methods (Koko, 2020). In this study, we have applied the maximum likelihood classifier (MLC) method, which is mostly used for image classification due to its availability, simplicity and could produce LULC maps with high classification accuracies (Li et al. 2014). Before image classification, the preparation of satellite images is essential to avoid these errors and to create a closer link between the data obtained and biophysical characteristics on the ground (Alawamy, 2020). Radiometric, atmospheric and geometric corrections have been done to fill the image gap and enhancement. In this study, the generation of composite band combinations such as natural color, true color, and false color composite, etc. is used to identify the land use type in the study area (Kafy et al., 2020). During data processing, bands such as red, green, blue, and near-infrared bands were utilized for Landsat images to find true color in ERDAS Imagine 2014. The LULC type was classified into five classes (Urban area, unused land, crop land, water areas, and greeneries) by applying the MLC method (Bishta, 2018). Table 2 represents the land use types and criteria which was considered for classifying the land cover types in this study. Bands were used 4–3-2 (Color Infrared) and 3–2-1 (True Color) for Landsat 5 images, 4–3-2 (True Color), and 5–4-3 (Color Infrared) for Landsat 8 images. Then the land cover type change direction during the study period 2000 to 2020 has been analyzed in ArcMap 10.6 version. To check the accuracy of the classification, more acceptable and best quantitative image classification accuracy measurement technics named Kappa statistics and confusing matrix were calculated (Janssen & Wel, 1994; Saputra & Lee, 2019; Yadav & Congalton, 2019). This study also calculated user accuracy, producer accuracy, and overall accuracy to check the accuracy of the LULC model. In this regard around 50 training sites have been randomly chosen for each image to ensure that each LULC type is covered by all spectral groups. Equation 1–4 is utilized for a different type of accuracy assessment. ∑ Totalsamplenumber × Totalcorrectedsamplenumber − (col.tot × rowtot) × 100% Kappacoefficient = ∑ Totalsamplenumber2 − col.tot × rowtot Useraccuracy = Num. of correctly classified pixels in each category × 100% Total numb of reference pixels in each category (row total) Produceraccuracy = Vol:. (1234567890) 13 Numofcorrectlyclassifiedpixels(diagonal) × 100% Totalnumbofreferencepixelsineachcategory(column) (1) (2) (3) GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Overallaccuracy = 431 Total num of corrected classified pixels (diagonal) × 100% Total num of reference pixels The value of the overall accuracy was found 93.33%, 93.33%, and 96.67% for the year 2000, 2010, and 2020 respectively and the Kappa coefficient values are 0.9143, 0.915, and 0.9577 which indicates the good accuracy of the classified data and suitable for urban expansion detection. Also, the results meet the recommended Kappa Statistics values recommended in the literature (Jansse & van der Wel, 1994; Saputra & Lee, 2019; Yadav & Congalton, 2019). LULC change analysis using LCM LULC change detection indicates the process of the identification and determination of the nature and extent of the LULC change over a period of time using remote sensing imagery (Meng et al., 2017). In this study, the LULC map of Jashore was extracted for 2000, 2010 and 2020 to detect the changes of LULC over two periods of 2000–2010 and 2010–2020 and also calculated the increase, decreases in each LULC types. The LCM is the most used models for LULC change detection and prediction that is accessible in the TerrSet software. The LCM is a software-based solution, developed to identify the growing challenges of LULC and analytic requirements for the conservation of biodiversity (Kumar et al., 2015). A review of the recent literatures suggests that the LCM model of TerrSet that integrates the Markov Chain-based neural network (MCNN), is very effective in predicting future LULC (Shahi et al., 2020). Based on the LULC change analysis, the transition of one LULC type to another was identified, along with gains of losses by LULC types. The spatial pattern of LULC change was determined through Eq. 5 (Mannan et al., 2019). LULCCi = LULCi,j� × LULCAi LULCi,j × 1 × 100% j × j� (5) where LULCCi = LULC change, LULCi,j = LULC area at an earlier date, LULCi,j′ = LULC area at a later date, LULCAi = Areas not changed. The urban growth rate of the study area has been calculated through Eq. 6 (Zhou et al., 2019). Urban growth rate(% ) = (4) UAj − UAi UAi × 100% (6) where UAi denotes the urban area in the initial year, UAj denotes the urban area in the final year. Urban growth prediction using CA based MPNNMC Model The LULC change analysis, simulation and future potential urban growth prediction have been conducted by using Land Change Modeler, an integrated software presented in IDRISI. The LCM model includes a set of tools for analyzing and modeling future LULC changes (Tewolde & Cabral, 2011). In this study, the LCM is used to implement the Neural Network Markov (NNM) model. The LCM is one of the most widely used simulating systems and is widely used in studies related to modeling and simulating future potential urban expansion (Mishra & Rai, 2016; Iizuka et al. 2017; Ranagalage et al., 2019; Gong et al., 2017). The NNM model requires four steps, or phases, to follow for urban growth prediction. To begin, (i) factors or model driver variables are chosen, (ii) transition-potential modeling and simulation is performed, and (iii) model validation and calibration of the model and actual pattern with the Kappa Index is performed (Aburasa et al., 2016; Al-sharif & Pradhan, 2014).and (iv) the creation of scenarios and simulations of potential future urban expansion (Simwanda et al., 2021). Researchers use LULC change models to detect and predict future potential LULC scenarios. The Land-use Change Modeler (LCM) is the most commonly used model to illustrate the LULC change analysis (Shahi et al., 2020). The artificial neural network (ANN) method, whose most popular model is the multilayer perceptron algorithm, is a wellknown method for analyzing satellite data (Fathollahi Roudary et al. 2018). The Multilayer Perception Neural Network Markov Chain (MPNNMC) Model can manage nonlinear functions, perform model-free function estimation, learn from previously unknown data relationships, and generalize unknown circumstances. As a result, ANNs are useful tools for Vol.: (0123456789) 13 432 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Fig. 2 GIS-based land cover distribution in Jashore in A 2000, B 2010, and C 2020 Table 3 Landcover area (in acres) in Jashore City during 2000–2020 CL crop land, UA urban areas, UL unused land, GE greeneries, WA water area, UG urban growth LULC types CL UA UL GE WA Total 2000 2010 13 Change rate in % Area % Area % Area % 2000–2010 2010–2020 1143.04 1829.23 534.53 1636.88 1021.58 6165.26 18.54 29.67 8.67 26.55 16.57 100% 662.15 2353.28 855.12 1912.46 382.25 6165.26 10.74 38.17 13.87 31.02 6.2 100% 391.41 2555.17 1055.14 1592.01 571.53 6165.26 6.35 41.44 17.11 25.81 9.27 100% -42.07 28.65 59.98 16.84 -62.58 -40.89 8.58 23.39 -16.76 49.52 modeling intra-urban LULCs, especially when the underlying complex relationships in the data are unknown (Arsanjani et al., 2013). Markov models, on the other hand, are commonly used as excellent projectors of potential LULCs. The Markov model is a stochastic model that describes the likelihood of one state transforming into another. The Markov model not only describes how to quantify conversion states between land-use forms but can also show the transition rate between them (Sang et al., 2011). As a result, combining the ANN and Markov models is a reliable approach for modeling and simulating potential intra-urban expansion (Simwanda et al., 2021). Vol:. (1234567890) 2020 LULC change depends on several factors. For the illustration of each LULC transition, choosing the best set of explanatory variables is most important in LULC modelling to ensure the best fit between the empirical data and the observable reality (Simwanda et al., 2021). As there are no fixed universal variables, several researchers have shown that the selection of LULC modeling drivers varies for different landscapes and for different study areas (Thappa and Murayama, 2012; Zhang et al., 2018; Iizuka et al. 2017; Simwanda et al., 2021). Although in most of the studies, similar variables have been used for which the results differed (Basu et al., 2021). Therefore, the driver variables are selected on the basis of GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 the characteristics of the study area, observed LULC changes, and based on expert knowledge about the study areas. In this study, factors such as slope, DEM, LULC patterns of the observed period, latitudes, and 433 longitudes were considered to simulate future urban growth. For the prediction of the future LULC pattern, the LULC maps of the year 2000, 2010, and 2020 were used as independent variables based on Fig. 3 LULC Change analysis during 2000–2020 Fig. 4 Spatiotemporal urban areas’ transition pattern during: A 2000–2010, B 2010–2020 Vol.: (0123456789) 13 434 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Fig. 5 Spatial illustration of LULC conversion in Jessore during 2000–2020 the recent studies done in different cities in Bangladesh (Ahmed, 2012; Kafy et al., 2020; Hasan et al. 2017). The slope and elevation data used in this study were derived from Google Earth. The urban disturbance, the distance of locations from the road were calculated from the GIS data, collected from Khulna City Corporation’s authorities. The data used for the other factors in this study was derived from land-use classification. We have used Neural Network Markov Chain (MPNNMC) model to estimate future potential urban growth of Jashore City. The MPNNMC is a form of ANN that uses back-propagation algorithm and is Vol:. (1234567890) 13 the most commonly used simulating model to simulate potential LULC transition (Ahmed, 2012). The MPNNMC includes 3 layers, one input layer, one or several hidden layers, and one output layer. The input layer represents input data to the network during training of the model. The data are received by the hidden layers, which extract and express information as weights from the input layers. The output layer results depend on the back-and-forward interactions between the three layers. In order to create the neural network–Markov modeling framework, we combined the MPNNMC and Markov chain models provided by LCM (Zhang et al., 2018). In the LCM, the GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Table 4 LULC conversion matrix of Jessore during 2000–2020 435 LULC types CL UA 2000–2010 (Area in percentage) CL 4.05% 5.04% UA 2.48% 31.06% UL 1.08% 1.26% GE 0.81% 1.42% WA 0.62% 6.86% Total 9.05% 45.64% 2010–2020 CL 1.41% 3.03% UA 1.03% 32.32% UL 2.18% 2.33% GE 1.43% 2.66% WA 0.28% 1.10% Total 6.34% 41.45% 2000–2020 CL 2.52% 4.17% UA 0.74% 31.48% UL 1.64% 1.14% GE 0.94% 0.71% WA 0.50% 3.95% Total 6.34% 41.45% multivariable function MPNNMC includes the driver variables to predict the transition potential of LUCs in any location between two points. The intra-urban LULC changes of Jashore during 2000–2020 have been used in the MPNNMC model to simulate future potential urban growth. To check the accuracy of the simulated model, percentage error, accuracy percentage were estimated and also calculated correlation coefficient (R) and RMSE by Eqs. 8 and 7, respectively. For model validation, a statistical similarity was performed by comparing the predicted and observed results of LULC for the year 2020. To check the accuracy of the prediction model, the spatiotemporal matched LULC classes and non-matched LULC classes were also identified by comparing the raster data set of the actual and predicted LULC maps for the year 2020. The higher the value of accuracy and lower the value of percentage error, the RMSE value indicates the UL GE WA Overall 4.96% 1.68% 4.73% 0.59% 0.26% 12.21% 5.87% 1.55% 1.52% 15.06% 3.33% 27.32% 0.24% 1.05% 0.08% 0.09% 4.32% 5.77% 20.16% 37.81% 8.67% 17.97% 15.39% 100.00% 2.45% 4.99% 4.88% 3.73% 0.67% 16.72% 1.74% 5.43% 2.69% 15.36% 0.59% 25.82% 0.41% 1.86% 0.12% 4.13% 3.13% 9.66% 9.05% 45.64% 12.21% 27.32% 5.77% 100.00% 6.66% 3.21% 3.93% 1.51% 1.41% 16.72% 6.43% 1.66% 1.89% 12.35% 3.50% 25.82% 0.37% 0.73% 0.07% 2.47% 6.03% 9.66% 20.16% 37.81% 8.67% 17.97% 15.39% 100.00% best-fitted prediction model (Shamshirband et al., 2020; Shatnawi & Qdais, 2019). � �2 ∑� Tactual − Tsimulated (6) RMSE = n � � � ∑� Tactual − T � actual × Tsimulated − T � simulated R= � �2 �∑ � � �2 Tactual − T � actual × Tsimulated − T � simulated (7) R and RMSE are the most commonly used metrics in geosciences to evaluate model performance (Mansour et al., 2020; Saputra & Lee, 2019). The RMSE value close to zero indicates the best performance of the model, while the + 1 value of R represents the perfect positive correlation between the observed and simulated variables. Vol.: (0123456789) 13 436 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Fig. 6 Spatiotemporal LULC urban growth direction analysis during: A 2000–2010, B 2010–2020, C 2000–2020 Results and discussion Spatial distribution of LULC types—2000 to 2020 The key causes of LULCC are rapid population growth in cities, migration from rural to urban areas, conversion of suburban areas to urban areas, a lack of evaluation of ecological services, ignorance, biophysical limitations, and the use of ecologically mismatched technologies (Hyandye et al., 2015). We Vol:. (1234567890) 13 extracted the LULC maps for 2000, 2010, and 2020 by using ERDAS Imagine and ArcGIS software. Figure 2 shows strong evidence of changing landscape patterns over the last two decades in Jashore City for each LUCC type. The land cover areas covered by different LULC types such as water areas, urban areas, greeneries, cropland and unused land cover are expressed in acres. Table 3 represents the statistics of different LULC cover areas in the study area during 2000–2020. GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 437 Fig. 7 Simulated future LULC pattern of Jashore city by A 2030, B 2040, and C 2050 In accordance with the LULC analysis in Table 3 Table 5 Validation of the urban growth prediction model LULC types CL UA UL GE WA Total LULC type in 2000. About 29.67% (1829.23 acres) LULC area in 2020 (acres) Actual Predicted Difference 391.41 2555.17 1055.14 1592.01 571.53 6165.26 388.22 2569.61 1072.44 1583.94 551.04 6165.26 3.19 − 14.44 − 17.30 8.07 20.49 – shows that urban areas were the most prominent Table 6 Simulated future LULC statistics of Jashore during 2030–2050 LULC types CL UA UL GE WA Total RMSE R2 Accuracy (%) 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.04 – 0.92 0.86 0.83 0.89 0.82 – 96 86 84 90 82 87 of total areas were extracted under urban areas. Area in percentage Change in % UG rate in % 2030 2040 2050 2020–2050 2000–2050 2020–2050 5.64% 59.84% 8.80% 23.19% 2.54% 100% 5.36% 62.99% 8.02% 21.59% 2.04% 100% 5.19% 65.08% 7.56% 20.34% 1.84% 100% − 1.16% + 23.64% − 9.55% − 5.47% − 7.43% - − 14.79% 26.52% − 0.79% + 2.31% − 13.22% - − 20.57% 39.51% − 108.52% − 23.59% − 292.52% Vol.: (0123456789) 13 438 Sequentially about 26.55% (1636.88 acres), 10.74% (1143.04 acres), 16.57% (1021.58 acres) and 8.67% (534.53 acres) of the total areas were for greeneries, cropland, water, and unused land in the year 2000. A moderate change in different LULC has been observed during the years 2000–2010. The percentage of areas for LULC types such as cropland and water were reduced. In 2020, croplands were observed at 6.35% (391.41 acres), urban areas were 41.44% (2555.17 acres), vegetative areas were 25.81% (1592.01 acres), water areas were 9.27% (571.53 acres), and unused lands were 17.11% (1055.14 acres) of the total study area. The highest declination rate was found (32.9% per decade) for crop land area over the past two decades, while in the case of water areas, this rate was 22% per decade. The area of urban areas is increasing by an average of 48.7% per decade as compared to the past decade. This indicates the huge urban growth trends in the study region for the past two decades. Urban growth analysis—2000 to 2020 Two changing trends in LULC classes were identified (Fig. 2); firstly, the increase of urban areas, GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 greeneries, and unused areas; and secondly, the declination of cropland and water areas at a tremendous rate over the study period (Fig. 3). Figure 4 represents the spatiotemporal urban growth transition, and Fig. 5 represents the spatiotemporal gain loss maps of all LULC classes over the study period. The Markov-CA LULC transition matrix is presented in Table 4. The result shows that the percentage of the urban area increased by 11.77% (from 1829.23 to 2555.17 acres) and unused land by 8.44% (from 534.53 to 1055.14 acres) during 2000–2020 (Fig. 3). Correspondingly, the cropland area decreased by 12.19% (from 1143.04 to 391.41 acres), the greeneries areas by 0.74% (from 1636.88 to 1592.01 acres), and the water areas by 7.30% (from 1021.58 to 571.53 acres). Figure 4 shows that during 2000–2010, about 8.50% and during 2010–2020, about 3.27% of the cropland was converted to urban areas. About 10.37% and 3.07% of water areas were converted to urban areas during 2000–2010 and 2010–2020, respectively. The urban growth rate was 28.65% between the years 2000 and 2010 and 8.58% from 2010 to 2020. Table 4 shows that the LULC transition in Jashore City has undergone a significant change since 2000. During 2000–2020, about 15% of water areas have Fig. 8 The transition map showing the spatiotemporal urban growth during: A 2020–2030, B 2030–2040, C 2040–2050 Vol:. (1234567890) 13 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Table 7 Predicted LULC transition probability matrix for 2020–2050 at Jashore 439 LULC types 2020–2030 CL UA UL GE WA Total 2030–2040 CL UA UL GE WA Total 2040–2050 CL UA UL GE WA Total 2020–2050 CL UA UL GE WA Total CL UA UL GE WA Overall 1.24% 0.70% 1.88% 1.50% 0.32% 5.64% 1.92% 38.11% 8.38% 8.04% 3.45% 59.91% 1.66% 1.33% 3.50% 2.18% 0.13% 8.80% 1.38% 1.32% 2.73% 13.68% 4.00% 23.11% 0.13% 0.06% 0.25% 0.31% 1.78% 2.54% 5.64% 59.83% 8.80% 23.19% 2.54% 100.00% 5.14% 0.04% 0.01% 0.01% 0.00% 5.19% 0.22% 62.17% 0.49% 1.34% 0.04% 64.26% 0.00% 0.05% 7.49% 0.01% 0.00% 7.56% 0.00% 0.09% 0.03% 20.22% 0.00% 20.34% 0.00% 0.13% 0.00% 0.00% 2.51% 2.65% 5.36% 62.48% 8.02% 21.59% 2.55% 100.00% 1.19% 0.56% 1.70% 1.44% 0.31% 5.19% 2.31% 38.96% 9.85% 9.64% 3.60% 64.35% 0.00% 0.05% 7.49% 0.01% 0.00% 7.56% 0.00% 0.09% 0.03% 20.22% 0.00% 20.34% 0.00% 0.13% 0.00% 0.00% 2.51% 2.65% 5.36% 62.48% 8.02% 21.59% 2.55% 100.00% 1.19% 0.56% 1.70% 1.44% 0.31% 5.19% 2.31% 38.96% 9.85% 9.64% 3.60% 64.35% 1.44% 1.18% 2.89% 1.92% 0.12% 7.55% 1.26% 0.77% 2.03% 12.39% 3.80% 20.26% 0.14% 0.07% 0.27% 0.33% 1.84% 2.65% 6.34% 41.54% 16.74% 25.71% 9.67% 100.00% been transformed, of which 3.95% in urban areas, 1.41% in unused land, and 3.50% in greeneries. About 6.66% of croplands were converted to unused land, 4.17% to urban areas, and 6.43% to greeneries. While the transformation of greeneries in urban areas was found to be less, only 0.71% of greeneries was transformed into urban areas during the study period. The LULC transition matrix shows that the croplands and water areas are experiencing the highest declination rates due to urban expansion in Jashore City. Several factors are responsible for this increasing trend of urban areas, greeneries and unused land cover. Rapid urbanization and the large influx of migrants seeking to better educate themselves and city services account for the construction of more infrastructures. This increases the amount of urban areas. Raufe (2011) found a significant transformation of the cropland pattern in Jashore, which resulted in the declination of crop area from 0.45 ha/household in 1981–1990 to 0.29 ha/household in 2001–2010. This output is consistent with the cropland declination pattern of this study. The cropland of Jashore City declined over the past two decades due to flooding and also for use of lands for commercial and housing purposes. Weather data analysis shows that the annual rainfall in Jashore City has decreased significantly over the last few decades and the average temperature has risen (Mondal et al., 2017). Due to inadequate rainfall, many reservoirs have dried up and converted to unused or vacant land. This adverse climate change has also affected farming activities and croplands have become urban areas, unused land and greeneries. About 77% of ground water has been used in cropping Vol.: (0123456789) 13 440 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Fig. 9 Predicted spatial locations of different LULC gain–loss during 2020–2050 in Bangladesh. Due to less rainfall, the ground water level of this Jashore has fallen drastically (7.95 m from the surface), for which residents face difficulties in collecting water for cropping. This resulted in the declination of croplands (DPHE, Jessore, 2012) and the conversion of croplands to unused lands at Jashore (Mondal & Hossain, 2009). This study also found that a large percentage (6.66%) of cropland has been transformed on unused lands during the 2000–2020 period. Besides many infrastructural and economic activities are influencing this LULC change and these are causing an adverse impact on the environment and ecology of the study area. Vol:. (1234567890) 13 This study also performed the spatiotemporal urban growth direction analysis during 2000–2010 and 2010–2020 and presented in Fig. 6. The analysis shows that urban areas expanded mostly in the eastern direction and then in the NW-NNW direction. The growth rate in the eastern and NNE-NE directions was observed 1.32 sq.km and 1.28 sq.km respectively during 2000–2020. While a negative growth rate has been observed in the WSW-W and SW-WSW directions. In the NW-NNW direction, the urban growth rate varied between 0.82 sq.km and 1.05 sq.km over the study period. This indicates that urbanization is not taking place in any GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 A 0.6 441 B CL C 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0.4 0.2 WA UA WA 0 GE 2020 - 2030 UL GE 1 CL UA 0.5 WA UL CL UA 0 GE UL 2030 - 2040 2040 - 2050 Fig. 10 Predicted LULC change direction during 2020–2050: A water area, B cropland, C greeneries structured manner and urban areas are increasing in an unplanned and uncontrolled way. Simulated urban LULC pattern—2030 to 2050 During 2000–2020, the LULC classes underwent a remarkable transformation, which is presented in Figs. 3, 4, 5 and Table 4. Therefore, a simulation to illustrate future LULC dynamics is essential. The aim is to forecast urban growth trends, which can provide the foundation of long-term sustainable urban planning. Based on the LULC change from 2000 to 2020, the MLP-MC model is used to simulate future potential urban growth patterns of Jashore City. The simulated urban LULC pattern of the study area is illustrated in Fig. 7 and LULC statistics in Table 6. To check the validity of the prediction model, the LULC pattern of the year 2020 was simulated and compared with the actual LULC pattern of 2020. Table 5 shows that, with a large number of iterations, all the potential LULC types showed an overall accuracy of 87% with an ­R2 value of more than 0.82 and all the land cover types with more than 82%. From the MPNNMC based CA model simulation, a significant increase was estimated in the urban areas by 18.40%, 21.55%, and 23.64% for the year 2030, 2040, and 2050 compared to 2020. Considering the forecasted years, in 50 years (2000–2050) the percentage of the urban area (26.52%) and greeneries (2.31%) will increase enormously. On the contrary, the water area (− 13.22%) and cropland (− 14.49%) area will decrease mostly while unused land (− 0.79%) will decrease slightly in the study area (Table 6). Table 6 shows that the urban growth rate will observe 39.51% during the next three decades in the study area while the water area will possess the highest percentage of declination. Potential expected urban growth may have an adverse impact on the environment, ecosystem, atmosphere, and biodiversity of the study region. The increase of urban areas moves the additional land to high-temperature areas, carbon emitted zones and if this continues, the urban area in the coming years will face significant environmental degradation. Proper implementation of land use planning, natural resource management, conservation of water areas, and increase of urban green area would make Jashore a sustainable city in the future. Urban growth direction simulation—2030 to 2050 The CA Markov transition matrix was determined to show the future spatial urban area expansion or transition from 2030 to 2050 over the study region and is presented in Fig. 8 and Table 7. The spatial locations of gains and losses of different LULC classes during 2020–2050 are also prepared and presented in Fig. 9. Usually, urban growth took place around the city centers. The predicted LULC transition matrix shows that LULC transformation will take place in about 74.79% of total areas during 2020–2030, 62.72% areas during 2030–2040 and 64.51% areas during 2040–2050. During 2020–2030 10.47% of unused land and 10.04% of greeneries will be Vol.: (0123456789) 13 442 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Fig. 11 Predicted urban area expansion direction during: A 2020–2030, B 2030–2040, and C 2040–2050 in the study region transformed into urban areas, while it will be 0.50% and 1.34% respectively during 2040–2050. Figure 8 shows that over time, other LULC conversions into urban areas will reduce gradually because due to rapid urbanization, the share of these LULC class areas will reduce dramatically. This will transform the entire study area into urban areas in the future and the percentage of eco-friendly LULC will be zero and the city will become uninhabitable. Table 7 shows the predicted LULC transformation matrix for the years 2020 to 2050. Analysis shows that during 2020 – 2030, about 8.04% of Vol:. (1234567890) 13 greeneries will be transformed into urban areas, 2.18% to unused lands. About 1.66% of croplands will be converted to unused land. By 2050, the conversion to urban land cover will be 3.60% for water areas, 2.31% for croplands, and 9.85% for unused lands. The extent of urban expansion relative to other LUCC varied significantly by period, according to the previous LUCC trend analysis. The simulated LULC class change rate in Fig. 10 shows that the water area and cropland area will transform mostly in urban areas rather than greeneries. Croplands will transform into urban areas and GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 greeneries; the declination rate was found to be 0.38 and 0.4 respectively. Due to climate change, such as the increase in temperature and drought tendency, and the reduction of total rainfall, the percentage of wetlands and cropland will continue to decrease. The simulated intra-urban land expansion showed that if the urban areas continued to expand without proper regulatory measures, the increase in urban areas would be found in NW-NNW direction, with a growth rate of 1.8 sq.km. The growth rate in the eastern direction will be the same 1.4 sq.km as the growth rate observed during 2000–2020. The growth rate in the south and SSE-S direction will be within the range of 1 to 1.3 sq.km during 2020–2050. As long as the percentage of cropland is moderately high in the ND-NNW direction (Fig. 11), urbanization will be more in that direction. The density of urban areas will be highest in the north and eastern directions of the city. This growth direction analysis indicates that future urban growth will be in an unplanned and uncontrolled manner like the period from 2000–2020. This will be an obstacle to sustainable environmental and economic development in the future. The overall analysis suggest that Jashore City had experienced and will experience rapid intra-urban land expansion. Our results are consistent with the findings of several researches in the context of land use prediction in the other major cities of Bangladesh, such as Khulna City (Fattah et al., 2021a), Rajshahi City (Kafy et al., 2020), Cumilla City (Kafy et al., 2021a), Dhaka City (Islam and Ahmed, 2021). The increase in population and housing demand, along with other service facilities such as commercial and industrial activities and road infrastructure, are the main drivers of rapid urban expansion in the urban and rural areas of Bangladesh (Hasan et al. 2017). If this expansion rate and population growth rate cannot be accommodated, urban sprawl might occur. Moreover, the declination of vegetative land cover will substantially change the climatic factors (Morshed & Fattah, 2021) and these will make the cities uninhabitable. Conclusion The developing cities around the world are going through enormous urban expansion, and this is affecting the environment as well as the ecosystem. Simulating future potential urban growth patterns helps 443 in effective and sustainable urban planning of infrastructure, the environment, and economy in urban areas. This study adopted Landsat satellite images from Landsat 5TM and Landsat 8 OLI to document the historical urban growth pattern of a developing city, Jashore, and predicted the urban LULC pattern using the MPNNMC model for the year 2030 to 2050. For the MPNNMC, seven variables such as slope, DEM, LULC pattern, latitudes and longitudes, road network, and distance of locations from the road are considered to simulate future potential intra-urban land use change patterns. The LULC change pattern showed the increase of urban areas by 11.77% and unused land by 8.44%, due to the declination of cropland by 12.19% and water areas by 7.30% during 2000–2020. The increasing pressure of unplanned urbanization will be reflected on eco-friendly lands, causing the declination of croplands, greeneries, and waterbodies that surround the city. These non-urban areas have started to disappear gradually, and the cropland is expected to decline from 6.35% in 2020 to 5.19% in 2050 and other LULC classes, such as unused land from 17.11% to 7.56%, greeneries from 25.81% to 20.34%, and water areas from 9.27% to 1.84% in 2050. Urban areas are expected to increase from 41.44% in 2020 to 65.08% in 2050. The predicted urban growth reveals an alarmingly rapid transformation of cropland and water areas into urban areas. The study demonstrates that the natural landscape of Jashore will be insufficient to achieve urban sustainability, as the maximum portion of greeneries and water-areas will be depleted in the future. The urban growth simulation model demonstrates that the city of Jashore will go through enormous, spontaneous, and unplanned urban expansion in the future. This will affect the climate, environment, and ecosystem of the city. So, the city urgently needs the implementation of an eco-friendly and sustainable urban development plan with the preservation and management of existing natural resources and nonurban areas to ensure a sustainable urban environment. This research provides useful perspectives for policymakers, responsible authors, environmental engineers, and urban planners in sustainable decisionmaking considering future aspects. Funding There was no funding for this research. Availability of data and material Data will be available. Vol.: (0123456789) 13 444 Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. References Aburasa, M. M., Ho, Y., Ramli, M. F., & Ash’aari, Z. H. (2016). The simulation and prediction of spatio-temporal urban growthtrends using cellular automata models: A review. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 52, 380–389. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jag.2016.07.007 Ahmed, S., & Bramley, G. (2015). How will Dhaka grow spatially in future? -Modelling its urban growth with a nearfuture planning scenario perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 4(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.07.003 Ahrend, R., Farchy, E., Kaplanis, I., & Lembcke, A. (2014). WHAT MAKES CITIES MORE PRODUCTIVE? EVIDENCE FROM FIVE OECD COUNTRIES ON THE ROLE OF URBAN GOVERNANCE. Journal of Regional Science, 57(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jors.12334 Aithal, B., Vinay, S., & Ramachandra, T. (2018). Simulating urban growth by two state modelling and connected network. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 4, 1297–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0506-1 Al-Darwish, Y., Ayad, H., Taha, D., & Saadallah, D. (2018). Predicting the future urban growth and it’s impacts on the surrounding environment using urban simulation models: Case study of Ibb city – Yemen. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 57(4), 2887–2895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej. 2017.10.009 Al-shalabi, M., Pradhan, B., Billa, L., Mansor, S., & Althuwaynee, O. (2013). Manifestation of Remote Sensing Data in Modeling Urban Sprawl Using the SLEUTH Model and Brute Force Calibration: A Case Study of Sana’a City, Yemen. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 41, 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12524-012-0215-6 Al-sharif, A., & Pradhan, B. (2014). Monitoring and predicting land use change inTripoli Metropolitan City using an integrated Markov chain and cellularautomata models in GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7, 4291–4301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-1119-7 Amato, F., Pontrandolfi, P., and Murgante, B. (2014) Using Spatiotemporal Analysis in Urban Sprawl Assessment and Prediction. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA (pp. 758–773). Springer, Cham. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09129-7_55 Araya, Y. H., & Cabral, P. (2010). Analysis and Modeling of Urban Land Cover Change in Setúbal and Sesimbra. Portugal. Remote Sensing, 2(6), 1549–1563. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/rs2061549 Arsanjani, J. J., Helbich, M., Kainz, W., & Boloorani, A. D. (2013). Integration of logistic regression, Markov chain Vol:. (1234567890) 13 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 and cellular automata models to simulate urban expansion. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21, 265–275. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jag.2011.12.014 Basu, T., Das, A., Pham, Q. B., et al. (2021). Development of an integrated peri-urban wetland degradation assessment approach for the Chatra Wetland in eastern India. Science and Reports, 11, 4470. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-021-83512-6 BBS. (2013). Dsitrict Statistics 2011: Jessore. Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Statistics and Informatics Division. Dhaka: Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics (BBS). Bihamta, N., Soffianian, A., Fakheran, S., & Gholamalifard, M. (2015). Using the SLEUTH urban growth model to simulate future urban expansion of the Isfahan metropolitan area, Iran. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 43, 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12524-014-0402-8 Boadi, K., Kuitunen, M., Raheem, K., & Hanninen, K. (2005). Urbanisation without development: Environmental and health implications in African Cities. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7, 465–500. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10668-004-5410-3 Chen, M., Zhang, H., Liu, W., & Zhang, W. (2014a). The global pattern of urbanization and economic growth: Evidence from the last three decades. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e103799. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103799 Chen, S., Chen, B., & Fath, B. (2014b). Urban ecosystem modeling and global change: Potential for rational urban management and emissions mitigation. Environmental Pollution, 190, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. envpol.2014.03.032 Clarke, K., & Hoppen, S. (1997). A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B, 24, 247–261. Dewan, A. M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2009). Land use and land cover change in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh: Using remote sensing to promote sustainable urbanization. Applied Geography, 29, 390–401. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.apgeog.2008.12.005 Dey, NN., Rakib, A.A.; Kafy, A.A.; Raikwar, V. Geospatial modelling of changes in land use/land cover dynamics using Multi-layer perception Markov chain model in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh. Environmental Challenges. 4(100148). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100148 DPHE, (Department of Public Health Engineering), Jessore, Ground Water Level Status of Jessore, 1981–2010, Personal Communication, 2012 Faisal, A. A., Haque, S., & Rahman, M. M. (2021). Retrieving spatial variation of aerosol level over urban mixed land surfaces using Landsat imageries: Degree of air pollution in Dhaka Metropolitan Area. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts a/b/c. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.pce.2021.103074 Fattah, M., Morshed, S. R., & Morshed, S. Y. (2021a). Multi-layer perceptron-Markov chain-based artificial neural network for modelling future land-specific carbon emission pattern and its influences on surface GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 temperature. SN Applied Science, 3, 359. https://doi. org/10.1007/s42452-021-04351-8 Fattah, M., Morshed, S. R., & Morshed, S. Y. (2021b). Impacts of land use-based carbon emission pattern on surface temperature dynamics: Experience from the urban and suburban areas of Khulna, Bangladesh. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment., 22, 100508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021. 100508 Feng, Y., Cai, Z., Tong, X., Wang, J., Gao, C., Chen, S., & Lei, Z. (2018). Urban Growth Modeling and Future Scenario Projection Using Cellular Automata (CA) Models and the R Package Optimx. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(10), 387. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijgi7100387 Gazi, M., Rahman, M., Uddin, M., & Rahman, F. (2020). Spatio-temporal dynamic land cover changes and their impacts on the urban thermal environment in the Chittagong metropolitan area, Bangladesh. Geojournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10178-4 General Economics Division (GED). (2020). Making Vision 2041 a Reality: Perspective Plaon of Bangladesh 2021– 2041. Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. Gómez, J., Patiño, J., Duque, J., & Passos, S. (2020). Spatiotemporal modeling of urban growth using machine learning. Remote Sensing, 12(1), 109. https://doi.org/10. 3390/rs12010109 Gong, H., Simwanda, M., & Murayama, Y. (2017). An Internet-Based GIS Platform Providing Data for Visualization and Spatial Analysis of Urbanization in Major Asian and African Cities. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 6, 257. Grant, U. (2010) Spatial inequality and urban poverty traps. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/publications/4526-spatial- inequality-andurban-poverty-traps Grekousis, G., Manetos, P., & Photis, Y. (2013). Modeling urban evolution using neural networks, fuzzy logic and GIS: The case of the Athens metropolitan area. Cities, 30, 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.03. 006 Han, H., Yang, C., & Song, J. (2015). Scenario simulation and the prediction of land use and land cover change in Beijing, China. Sustainability, 7(4), 4260–4279. https://doi. org/10.3390/su7044260 Hasan, M., Hossain, M., Bari, M., Islam, M. (2013). Agricultural Land Availability in Bangladesh; SRDI, Ministry of Agriculture: Dhaka, Bangladesh (p. 42). ISBN 978-984-33-6141-7. Hassan, M., & Nazem, M. N. (2016). Examination of land use/ land cover changes, urban growth dynamics, and environmental sustainability in Chittagong city, Bangladesh. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18, 697– 716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9672-8 Hassan, M. M., & Southworth, J. (2017). Analyzing land cover change and urban growth trajectories of the mega-urban region of Dhaka using remotely sensed data and an ensemble classifier. Sustainability, 10(10), 1–24. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su10010010 Hassan, et al. (2016). Dynamics of land use and land cover change (LULCC) using geospatial techniques: A case 445 study of Islamabad Pakistan. Springer plus, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2414-z He, C., Okada, N., Zhang, Q., Shi, P., & Li, J. (2008). Modelling dynamic urban expansion processes incorporating a potential model with cellular automata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(12), 79–91. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.landurbplan.2007.12.010 He, Q., He, W., Song, Y., Wu, J., Yin, C., & Mou, Y. (2018). The impact of urban growth patterns on urban vitality in newly built-up areas based on an association rules analysis using geographical ‘big data.’ Land Use Policy, 78, 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07. 020 Herold, M., Goldstein, N., & Clarke, K. (2003). The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: Measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(3), 286– 302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00075-0 Hoque, M. Z., Cui, S., Islam, I., Xu, L., & Tang, J. (2020). Future impact of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem services in the lower Meghna River Estuary, Bandladesh. Sustainability, 12, 2112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su12052112 Hossain, M. (2015). Declining productivity of agricultural land in Bangladesh. J Agroecol Nat Resour Manag, 2, 25–30. Hossain, M., Lin, C. K., & Hussain, M. Z. (2001). Goodbye Chakaria Sunderban: The oldest mangrove forest. The Society of Wetland Scientists Bulletin, 18, 19–22. https:// doi.org/10.1672/0732-9393(2001)018[0019:GCSTOM] 2.0.CO;2 Hu, Y., Batunacun, Zhen, L., & Zhuang, D. (2019). Assessment of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change in Guangxi, China. Scientific Reports, 9, 2189. https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41598-019-38487-w Hyandye, C., Mandara, C. G., & Safari, J. (2015). GIS and logit regression model applications in land use/land cover change and distribution in Usangu Catchment. American Journal of Remote Sensing, 3(1), 6–16. https:// doi.org/10.11648/j.ajrs.20150301.12 Islam, M. R., Miah, M. G., & Inoue, Y. (2016). Analysis of land use and land cover changes in the coastal area of Bangladesh using Landsat imagery. Land Degradation and Development, 27, 899–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/ ldr.2339 Islam, M. S., & Ahmed, R. (2012). Land use change prediction in Dhaka City using Gis aided Markov chain modeling. Journal of Life and Earth Science, 6, 81–89. https://doi. org/10.3329/jles.v6i0.9726 Islam, G. M., Islam, A. K., Shopan, A. A., Rahman, M. M., Lazar, A. N., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2015). Implications of agricultural land use change to ecosystem services in the Ganges delta. J. Environ. Manag., 161, 443–452. Jansse, L., & van der Wel, F. (1994). Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(4), 419–426. Janssen, L. L., & Wel, F. J. (1994). Accuracy assessment of satellite derived Land-Gover data: A review. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60(4), 419–426. Kafy, A.-A., Faisal, A.-A., Hasan, M. M., Abdullah-Al- Faisal, Islam, M., & Rahman, M. S. (2020) Modelling future land use land cover changes and their impacts on land Vol.: (0123456789) 13 446 surface temperatures in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 18(2). Kafy, A.-A., Faisal, A.-A., Rahman, M., Islam, M., Rakib, A., Islam, M., & Sattar, G. S. (2021a). Prediction of seasonal urban thermal field variance index using machine learning algorithms in Cumilla, Bangladesh. Sustainable Cities and Society, 64, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs. 2020.102542 Kafy, A.-A., Faisal, A.-A., Shuvo, R. M., Naim, M. N., Sikdar, M. S., Chowdhury, R., & Kona, M. (2021b). Remote sensing approach to simulate the land use/land cover and seasonal land surface temperature change using machine learning algorithms in a fastest-growing megacity of Bangladesh. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 21, 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase. 2020.100463 Kafy, A. A., Rakib, A. A., Akter, K. S., et al. (2021). Monitoring the effects of vegetation cover losses on land surface temperature dynamics using geospatial approach in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh. Environmental Challenges. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021c.100187 Khan, M. M. H., Bryceson, I., Kolivras, K. N., Faruque, F., Rahman, M. M., & Haque, U. (2015). Natural disasters and land-use/land-cover change in the southwest coastal areas of Bangladesh. Regional Environmental Change, 15, 241–250. Khanal, N., Uddin, K., Matin, M., & Tenneson, K. (2019). Automatic detection of spatiotemporal urban expansion patterns by fusing OSM and landsat data in Kathmandu. Remote Sensing, 11(19), 2296. https://doi.org/10.3390/ rs11192296 Kong, F., Yin, H., Nakagoshi, N., & James, P. (2012). Simulating urban growth processes incorporating a potential model with spatial metrics. Ecological Indicators, 20, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.003 Kumar, K. S., Bhaskar, P. U., & Padmakumari, K. (2015). Application of land change modeler for prediction of future land use land cover: A case study of Vijayawada city. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Science and Technological Research, 3(01), 773–783. Li, H., Xiao, P., Feng, X., Yang, Y., Wang, L., Zhang, W., & Wang, X. (2017). Using Land Long-Term Data Records to Map Land Cover Changes in China Over 1981–2010. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(4), 1372–1389. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2645203 Li, Y., & Liu, G. (2017). Characterizing spatiotemporal pattern of land use change and its driving force based on GIS and landscape analysis techniques in Tianjin during 2000–2015. Sustainability, 9(6), 894. https://doi. org/10.3390/su9060894 Maarseveen, M., Martinez, J., & Flacke, J. (2018) GIS in sustainable urban planning and management: A global perspective (1st Edn). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10. 1201/9781315146638 Maduako, I., Yun, Z., & Patrick, B. (2016). Simulation and prediction of land surface temperature (LST) dynamics within Ikom City in Nigeria using artificial neural network (ANN). Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS, 5(1), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.4172/2469-4134.1000158 Vol:. (1234567890) 13 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Mannan, A., Liu, J., Zhongke, F., Khan, T., Saeed, S., Mukete, B., & Shah, S. (2019). Application of landuse/land cover changes in monitoring and projecting forest biomass carbon loss in Pakistan. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17, 535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. gecco.2019.e00535 Mansour, S., Al-Belushi, M., & Al-Awadhi, T. (2020). Monitoring land use and land cover changes in the mountainous cities of Oman using GIS and CA-Markov modelling techniques. Land Use Policy, 91, 104414. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104414 Meng, B., Ge, J., Liang, T., Yang, S., Gao, J., Feng, Q., Cui, X., Huang, X., & Xie, H. (2017). Evaluation of remote sensing inversion error for the above-ground biomass of Alpine Meadow grassland based on multi-source satellite data. Remote Sens, 9(4), 372. Mishra, V.N.; Rai, P.K. (2016) A remote sensing aided multilayer perceptron-Markov chain analysis for land use and land cover change prediction in Patna district (Bihar), India. Arab. J. Geosci. 9. Mohammad, M., Sahebgharani, A., & Makeipour, E. (2013). Urban growth simulationthrough cellular automata (CA), anaiytic hierarchy process (AHP) and GIS, case study of 8th and 12th municipal districts of Isfahan. Geographia Technica, 8(2), 57–70. Mondal, M. S. and Hossain, M. M. A. 2009. Characterizing Long-term Changes of Bangladesh Climate in Context of Agriculture and Irrigation. Bureau of Research, Testing and Consultation of Bangladesh University of Engineering & Technology, Climate Change Cell, DoE, MoEF; Component 4b, CDMP, MoFDM. June 2009, Dhaka Mondal, K. K., Akhter, M. A., Mallik, M., & Hassan, S. (2017) Study on Rainfall and Temperature Trend of Khulna Division in Bangladesh. DEW-DROP, 4. Morshed, S. R., Fattah, M. A., Rimi, A. A., & Haque, M. N. (2020). Surface temperature dynamics in response to land cover tranformation. Journal of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, 11(2), 94–110. Morshed, S. R., & Fattah, M. A. (2021). Responses of spatiotemporal vegetative land cover to meteorological changes in Bangladesh. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase. 2021.100658 Morshed, S. R., Fattah, M. A., Haque, M. N., & Morshed, S. Y. (2021). Future ecosystem service value modeling with land cover dynamics by using machine learning based Artificial Neural Network model for Jashore city, Bangladesh. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts a/b/c. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2021.103021 Moore, M., Gould, P., & Keary, B. (2003). Global urbanization and impact on health. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 206(4–5), 269–278. https:// doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00223 Nagendra, H., Munroe, D., & Southworth, J. (2004). From pattern to process: Landscape fragmentation and the analysis of land use/land cover change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 101(2–3), 111–115. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.003 Nath, B., Niu, Z., & Singh, R. (2018). Land use and land cover changes, and environment and risk evaluation of Dujiangyan City (SW China) using remote sensing and GIS GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 techniques. Sustainability, 10(12), 4631. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su10124631 Nurwanda, A., Zain, A., & Rustiadi, E. (2015). Analysis of land cover changes and landscape fragmentation in Batanghari Regency, Jambi Province. International Conference, Intelligent Planning Towards Smart Cities, CITIES 2015. Surabaya, Indonesia: In Proceedings of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, CITIES 2015. Oliva, F. E., Dalmau, O. S., and Alarcón, T. E. (2014) A Supervised Segmentation Algorithm for Crop Classification Based on Histograms Using Satellite Images. Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 8856, pp. 327–335. Mexico: Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-13647-9_30 Park, S., Jeon, S., Kim, S., & Choi, C. (2011). Prediction and comparison of urban growth by land suitability index mapping using GIS and RS in South Korea. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(2), 104–114. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.landurbplan.2010.09.001 Pijanowski, B., Tayyebi, A., Doucette, J., Pekin, B., Braun, D., & Plourde, J. (2014). A big data urban growth simulation at a national scale: Configuring the GIS and neural network based Land Transformation Model to run in a High Performance Computing (HPC) environment. Environmental Modelling & Software, 51, 250–268. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.015 Pramanik, M., & Stathakis, D. (2015). Forecasting urban sprawl in Dhaka city of Bangladesh. Environment and Planning b: Urban Analytics and City Science, 43(4), 756–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813515595406 Ranagalage, M., Wang, R., Gunarathna, M. H. J. P., Dissanayake, D., Murayama, Y., & Simwanda, M. (2019). Spatial forecasting of the landscape in rapidly urbanizing hill stations of South Asia: A case study. Remote Sensor, 11, 1743. Reddy, C. S., Pasha, S. V., Jha, C. S., Diwakar, P. G., & Dadhwal, V. K. (2016). Development of national database on long-term deforestation (1930–2014) in Bangladesh. Global Planet Change, 139, 173–182. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.02.003 Rimal, B., Zhang, L., Keshtkar, H., Haack, B., Rijal, S., & Zhang, P. (2018). Land use/land cover dynamics and modeling of urban land expansion by the integration of cellular automata and Markov chain. ISPRS Int. J. GeoInf, 7(4), 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7040154 Salam, R., Islam, A. T., Shill, B., Alam, G., Hasanuzzaman, M., Hasan, M., & Shouse, R. (2021). Nexus between vulnerability and adaptive capacity of drought-prone rural households in northern Bangladesh. Natural Hazards. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04473-z Sang, L., Zhang, C., Yang, J., Zhu, D., & Yun, W. (2011). Simulation of land use spatial pattern of towns and villages based on CA-Markov model. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54, 938–943. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.mcm.2010.11.019 Santé, I., García, A., Miranda, D., & Crecente, R. (2010). Cellular automata models for the simulation of realworld urban processes: A review and analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 96(2), 108–122. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.03.001 447 Saputra, M. H., & Lee, H. S. (2019). Prediction of Land Use and Land Cover Changes for North Sumatra, Indonesia, Using an Artificial-Neural-Network-Based Cellular Automaton. Sustainability, 11(11), 3024. https://doi. org/10.3390/su11113024 Simwanda, M., Murayama, Y., Phiri, D., Nyirenda, V. R., & Ranagalage, M. (2021). Simulating Scenarios of Future Intra-Urban Land-Use Expansion Based on the Neural Network–Markov Model: A Case Study of Lusaka. Zambia. Remote Sens., 13, 942. https://doi.org/10. 3390/rs13050942 Shahi, E., Karimi, S., & Jafari, H. R. (2020). Monitoring and modeling land use/cover changes in Arasbaran protected Area using and integrated Markov chain and artificial neural network. Model. Earth Syst. Environ., 6, 1901–1911. Shamshirband, S., Hashemi, S., Salimi, H., & Samadianfard, S. (2020). Predicting Standardized Streamflow index for hydrological drought using machine learning models. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 14(1), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19942060.2020.1715844 Shatnawi, N., & Qdais, H. A. (2019). Mapping urban land surface temperature using remote sensing techniques and artificial neural network modelling. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(10), 3968–3983. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1557792 Shubho, M., & Islam, I. (2020). An integrated approach to modeling urban growth using modified built-up area extraction technique. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 17, 2793–2810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-020-02623-1 Somvanshi, S. S., Bhalla, O., Kunwar, P., et al. (2020). Monitoring spatial LULC changes and its growth prediction based on statistical models and earth observation datasets of Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. India. Environ Dev Sustain, 22, 1073–1091. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10668-018-0234-8 Subedi, P., Subedi, K., & Thapa, B. (2013). Application of a Hybrid Cellular Automaton – Markov (CA-Markov) Model in Land-Use Change Prediction: A Case Study of Saddle Creek Drainage Basin. Florida. Applied Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 1(6), 126–132. Talukdar, S., Ghose, B., Shahfahad, Salam, R., Mahato, S., Pham, Q., Avand, M. (2020) Flood susceptibility modeling in Teesta River basin, Bangladesh using novel ensembles of bagging algorithms. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34, 2277–2300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01862-5 Tendaupenyu, P., Magadza, C. H., & Murwira, A. (2016). Changes in landuse/landcover patterns and human population growth in the Lake Chivero catchment. Zimbabwe. Geocarto Internationa, 32(7), 797–811. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10106049.2016.1178815 Tewolde, M. G., & Cabral, P. (2011). Urban Sprawl analysis and modeling in Asmara, Eritrea. Remote Sensor, 3, 2148–2165. Thapa, R. B., & Murayama, Y. (2012). Scenario based urban growth allocation in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105, 140–148. Vol.: (0123456789) 13 448 Ullah, S., Tahir, A., Akbar, T., Hassan, Q., Dewan, A., Khan, A., & Khan, M. (2019). Remote sensing-based quantification of the relationships between land use land cover changes and surface temperature over the lower Himalayan Region. Sustainability, 11(19), 5492. Verburg, P., Overmars, K., Huigen, M., de Groot, W., & Veldkamp, A. (2006). Analysis of the Effects of Land Use Change on Protected Areas in the Philippines., 26(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.005 Weng, Q. (2012). Remote sensing of impervious surfaces in the urban areas: Requirements, methods, and trends. Remote Sensing of Environment, 117, 34–49. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.rse.2011.02.030 World Bank. (2017). Cities, slums, and early child growth: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. World Bank Group. Wu, J., Li, R., Ding, R., Li, T., & Sun, H. (2017). City expansion model based on population diffusion and road growth. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.08.002 Yadav, K., & Congalton, R. (2019). Correction: Yadav. K. and Congalton. R. Accuracy Assessment of Global Food Security-Support Analysis Data (GFSAD) Cropland Extent Maps Produced at Three Different Spatial Resolutions. Remote Sensing, 11(6), 630. https://doi.org/10. 3390/rs11060630 Yadav, K., and Congalton, R. G. (2019) Correction: Yadav. K. and Congalton. R. Accuracy Assessment of Global Food Security-Support Analysis Data (GFSAD) Cropland Extent Maps Produced at Three Different Spatial Resolutions. Remote Sens. (2018). 10, 1800. Remote Sensing, 11(6), 630. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060630 Vol:. (1234567890) 13 GeoJournal (2023) 88:425–448 Ying, C., Ling, H., & Kai, H. (2017). Change and Optimization of Landscape Patterns in a Basin Based on Remote Sensing Images: A Case Study in China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26(5), 2343–2353. https://doi. org/10.15244/pjoes/70007 Zhang, D., Liu, X., Wu, X., Yao, Y., Wu, X., & Chen, Y. (2018). Multiple intra-urban land use simulations and driving factors analysis: A case study in Huicheng, China. Gisci. Remote Sensor, 56, 282–308. Zhang, F., Yushanjiang, A., & Jing, Y. (2019). Assessing and predicting changes of the ecosystem service values based on land use/cover change in Ebinur Lake Wetland National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Science of the Total Environment, 656, 1133–1144. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.444 Zheng, H. W., Shen, G. Q., Wang, H., & Hong, J. (2015). Simulating land use change in urban renewal areas: A case study in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 46, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.008 Zhou, Y., Varquez, A., & Kanda, M. (2019). High-resolution global urban growth projection based on multiple applications of the SLEUTH urban growth model. Scientific Data, 6, 34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0048-z Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.