Key Words: Quality management, Excellence, quality indicators, SWOT, Benchmarking Introduction Each people wants quality education. Quality is a dynamic idea. It can be used both as an absolute and a relative concept. In absolute sense, it exhibits as highest possible standards which cannot be surpassed. In relative views, it is a means by which the end products is judged to be up to standard. Quality can be defined as that which best satisfies and exceeds customer needs and wants. Quality education needs quality management. It shows conformance to specification and fitness for purpose or use zero defects. It is the approach popularized by Peters and Waterman in in the search of Excellence (1982). Need and Significance Each educational institution needs quality education for its progress. It depends on quality management of the institution. It is observed that there are thousand institutions running in our country, but a few are up to mark, some are running haphazardly and some are meant for commercial purpose. If we want educational development of country for development of civilization, we have to know the skill of management. We have to learn the strategies of management, indexes of quality management and Road maps etc. for academic institutions. To high light the above concepts this topic is taken. Objectives To find the need of quality management in education; To estimate the indicators of quality management; To outline the strategies of quality management; To design a roadmap of quality management; and To develop some suggestions for implication of quality management in educational institution. Methods a) Indicators of Quality Discipline and Punctuality Cleanliness and up-keep of campus Excellence in academic achievement Excellence in non-academic achievement and Organizational Climate and satisfaction of the customers The excellence in academic and non-academic components are tangible and overt, whereas outcome in discipline, punctuality, cleanliness, and satisfaction are intangibles and covert. It is important to say that concept of quality goes beyond conventional idea of performance in academic ideas. Indicators can be quality of input like students, teachers, instructional resources, leadership qualities of the principal etc.; can be process aspects of quality. b) Strategies of Quality Management The following steps may be helpful as a possible planning sequence which may be adopted in any educational institution for quality management. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Vision, Mission and Values Market Analysis SWOT Analysis and Critical Success Factors Corporate and Business Plan Quality Policy and Quality Plan Quality Costs Evaluation and Feedback c) Road map of Quality Management Andy Frazier in his book named ‘The Road Map of Quality Transformation in Education’ suggests six stages: prepare, assess, plan, deploy, sustain and breakthrough. The details are given hereunder. Prepare The first important component of preparation is Vision mission goals and targets. The vision must be according to time (short term, medium term, long term) and size (micro, macro, mega scenario). Vision has to be collectively developed or collectively adopted and accepted. The second aspect is to build the quality teams. It will develop on the basis of project and project teams. Involvement of everyone in the institute in the quality team is an important consideration. The third element of the preparation is establishing the consistency of purpose. The entire organization is to prepare to accept it as an ongoing process and the constancy of purpose must be visible and articulated. The fourth element of the preparation is to decide the level that is mega, micro, and macro and within that area of focus of the exercise. Assess There are three steps may be followed in the process. The first one is to develop, adopt or adapt an institutional evaluation instrument. There are good number of instruments available. Each instrument has its strength and weaknesses. The second aspect of assessment is to create feasibility of decision making on data and facts. It is to examine the amount of data and facts that are available on record in the institute; and the quality of data in terms of their reliability, comprehensiveness, and recently etc. The purpose of assessment is to build a decision support system. The third component is the SWOT analysis, where collectively the members of organization analysis and understand the strengths, weakness, opportunities and threats of and to the organizations. SWOT accumulates facts, feelings, perceptions, and understanding of organizational and inter-personal processes. Plans A normal approach to planning should be to identify the possible methods and means to achieve and also identify the person and the teams who would be responsible to implement the activities. While activities are identified, it is a good idea to develop them in the form of project, since it is time bound and goal oriented. The plan must indicate the mechanism of assessment, monitoring and evaluation. It should indicate the involve teams responsibility, method of evaluation and monitoring, midcourse corrections and re-planning. Deploy It is real implementation. Here innovation is installed into the minds of the implements as well as in the organizational platform. Through this process the innovation may be tried out. This trial is followed by review and evaluation. Here, the innovation may be reviewed in the basis of experience and outcome obtained. Sustain After trial and evaluation, the innovation as well as the process of adaptation can be modified and continued. This continuation itself is a sustained process of adoption of innovation. In this stage innovation is internalized and it becomes a part and parcel of the organizational process and also ethos. When particular innovation is internalized in a system it needs a different way of working. As more and more innovations are internalized, institutions develop a new culture of change. Beyond culture is ethos when change becomes natural and hence sustainable. This stage is linked with next step breakthrough. Breakthrough Change as a culture as the ethos of an organization. There is no change permanent. It moves from one level to another. It is visible more in the form of cycle where we move around two three stages of planning, action, reflection and so on. This is a continuous approach of change and moving forward. Findings and Implications From the above study it was obtained the chief indicators of quality management of academic institutions, the various strategies for implicating of quality management, and a clear cut road map of quality management. The study highlights a wider dimension for quality management of academic institutes. These are experimented in various institutions having amazing result. The teachers, academia, managers, educational institutions may implement it in their respective field to reap the better harvest. Suggestions and Conclusion A good quality product depends on a good quality resources and management. There are numerous educational institutions running haphazardly without proper management. Everybody in this world needs good products that means quality or benchmarking standardized product. To harvest these, it needs good quality management and resources. Now a day several models on quality management are available. Some places resources are also available. The real lack is our sincere approach of implementation. The more sincere we become in implementation the strategies of quality management the more success we become to achieve our goal. All the stakeholders in educational enterprises must be aware about it and adopt sincerely. Hope, the output will be marvelous. References Frazier, A. Roadmap for Quality Transformation in Education, Florida, St. Lucie Press, 1997 Lindsay, W.M. and Petrick J. A., Total Quality and Organizational Development, Florida, St. Lucie Press, 1997 Lessem, R. Hand Book of Total Quality Learning: Building a Learning Organization, New Delhi, Beacon Books, 1997 Okland J.S. Total Quality Management, Oxford, Heivemann, 1989 Peters and Waterman, In the Search of Excellence, 1982. Teeter, D.J. and Lozier, G.G. (eds.) Pursuit of Quality in Higher Education: Case Studies in Total Quality Management, Sanfranscisco, Jossey-Bass, 1993