CONTACT LENS I OPT 414 LECTURE NOTES LECTURER: DR. BAZUAYE K.N 08033742563 1 CONTACT LENS INTRODUCTION 1. Development INTRODUCTION 2. Definition 3. Determinants 1. Development PEOPLE/ COUNTRY Leonardo da Vinci Italy YEAR ACHIEVEMENT LENS MATERIAL 1508 First to develop the concept that A water – filled lens Eugene Fick 1887 First to design The first powered contact lens Feinbloem 1936 First to utilize Rohm & Haas company Muller and Obrig Theodore Obrig 1936 GLASS that affected lid movement which czapods & dallas introduce moulding tecknique to improve sceral leses Synthetic plastic for contact lens PMMA Norman Bier 1943 Kelvin Tuohy 1948 Muller –Welt (America) William Sohnges, Frank Dickson, John Neil Hofsthelter & Graham 1950 Introduced transparent SCERA methlmethacrylate material Developed techniques for making PMMA SCLERA sclera lens with it Introduced plastic polymethylmethacrylate SCLERA (PMMA) Minimum clearance Perforated PMMA SCLERA scleral lens to reduce central corneal clowding Conceived the idea of PMMA PMMA Cornea material for the cornea Muller –welt plastic fluid less PMMA Sclera lens Using tuohy’s Idea, developed a PMMA Cornea microlens several diopters flatter than the corneal apex. Diameter 9.50mm, thickness 0.20mm Reported in a journal these development of Leonardo da Vinci and others. 1936 1940 1951 1953 2 PART OF THE EYE WORN Can be placed directly on the eye SCLERA SCLERA Norman Bier 1955 Wesley and jessen Wichterle & lim 1956 1960 Contour lens of same diameter PMMA Cornea with microlens but 0.50mm in the central optical portion with flatter peripheral curves Deloped a sphericon lens with PMMA Cornea diameter 8.50mm Publish the first reference to development of soft hydrogel material that uses water as vehicle to supply oxygen to the cornea 1961 1970 hydrogel material was introduced A decade after soft contact lens was introduced , rigid contact lenses came back and was launched as rigid gas permeable lens (RGP materials) that uses silicon as vehicle to supply oxygen to the cornea Bauch and lomb (America) 1971 Griffin (Canada) 1971 Soflens : hydroxymethylmethacrylate (HEMA) chains cross linked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) Naturalens lathe cut made hydroxymethylmethacryla te (HEMA) HYDROGEL Cornea Cornea The mechanical support of the scleral lenses was the sclera itself. They may be perforated to allow better circulation of tears which may enhance lens tolerance. Scleral lenses do occasionally allow a patient to wear a CL in cases of severe keratoconus, severe lid problems and marked astigmatism 2. Definition of contact lens Contact Lenses are Medical devices which are made exclusively of plastics and molded to conform to the complex curves of the cornea, corneoscleral junction (limbus) and sclera for the correction of ametropia (myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism), cosmetic (aniridia, coloboma, corneal scars) actresses changing colour of their eyes. 3. Determinants of use of contact lenses Indications and contraindications for CL use Indications Visual : Anisometropia, high myopia, aphakia, irregular corneae,scarring, keratoconus, grafts Occupational: Theatre, film and other stage performers Armed forces Professional sports Cosmetics To avoid spectacles Change eye colour Prosthetic lenses (eg, masking lenses to conceal corneal scar) or shells Medical: Therapeutic Bondage Psychological: Where the patient cannot accept wearing spectacles 3 Others Sports Physical inability to wear spectacles (allergy to frame materials, nasal problems) Contraindications Visual: Low refractive errors (eg, +1.00 – 0.75; -0.25/-0.50) , Correction required only for near vision, Acuity with lenses may be worse than with spectacles. Prism required horizontally or 3prism vertically Occupational: Where legal constraints abounds Cosmetics: Where spectacles are better with alarge angle squint , Where spectacles hide facial disfigurement, Where a patient has previously been reconciled to a long standing scarred eye. Medical: Active infection or pathology, Recurrent corneal erosion, Severe sinus or catarrhal problems ,Allergies, Vernal catarrhal, Diabetes (fragile epithelium) Anatomical (eg, mis-shapen lids) Psychological: Cannot accept the idea of lens on the eye., Cannot tolerate any level of discomfort, Unable to cope with insertion and removal, Total perfectionist Sensitivity: Cornea too sensitive, Lid or lid margins Dryness: Poor volume or quality of tears , Dry environment, Drug-induced (eg, antihistamine) Word-induced (eg, VDUs) Advantages and disadvantages of CLs compared with spectacles 1Wide field of view 2 Better for refractive anisometropia 3.Retinal image size almost normal with refractice ametropia (eg, with aphakia, high minus) 4 No unwanted prismatic effects with eye movements 5 Less convergence required by hyperopes for near vision 6 Avoid surface reflections 7 Minimal oblique or other aberrations 8 Cosmetically superior 9 More practical for sports 10 Avoid weather problems (rain, snow, fogging up) 11 Therapeutic uses 12 Provide good acuity for irregular corneae (keratoconus, trauma and subsequent to refractive surgery) 13Vocational uses. Disadvantages 1 Time required for fitting and adaptation 2 Handling skills required by patient 3 Hygiene procedures and lens disinfection necessary 4 Wearing time may be limited 5 For binocular problems, only vertical prism possible 6 Greater convergence required by myopes for near vision 7 Lenses can be lost or broken 8 Problems with foreign bodies 9 Peripheral flare (especially at night) 4 10 Deteriorate with use and age 11 retinal image size disparity in axial anisometropia Hard Contact Lenses Over Soft Contact Lens Advantages Of Hard Contact Lenses Over Soft Contact LenS. 1Absolute control over the lens parameters 2 The lenses are easy to check 3 Limited modifications 4 Vision is superior – greater rigidity of the optical system 5 They are usually easier to care for. 6 Almost any desired shape can be incorporated into the hard CLs. Disadvantages 1. Limited wearing tolerance- many will not adapt to the movement of images as the lens move upward and downwards with each blink. 2. Shape of the eyelids and cornea. With tight lids, the hard lens may not stay as easily upon the eye and be pushed off the central cornea. Certain corneal shapes do not allow adequate centration of the hard CL. 3. If there is any limbal or corneal irregularities, a soft CL is preferable. Soft Contact Lenses Over Hard Contact Lenses Two basic types of plastics: The hydrophilic lens comprises the vast majority of soft CLs and the silicon rubber (elastomere) accounts for the rest. The plastic material used for manufacturing soft CLs is hydroxymethylmethacrylate (HEMA) Advantages 1. They are generally more comfortable than their cousins, the hard CLs. 2. It is possible to fit many of the patients who cannot be fitted with hard CLs for reasons of sensitivity or shape of lids or eyes. Disadvantages 1. Vision may not be so crisp with soft as it is with hard CLs 2. Increased care is a must for continuation of successful wear 3. The lenses are less durable with a greater tendency to tear and deposits which almost never occur with hard CLs area problem 4. Certain soft CLs are available only in one country. Foreign travel can be a problem. 5. Limited design and parameters are the other problems for commercially available soft CLs. 6. For the most complicated toric and bifocal CLs, exact reproduction is not a reality at present and replacement may be quite difficult at times. 7. Although initial purchase of soft CLs may be similar in price to or even less than hard CLs they are more expensive to maintain owing to the decreased lifespan of the lenses and the largest volume of CL solutions used. USUAGE DAILY WEAR IF USED DAILY EXTENDED WEAR if worn all the time even when bathing 5 CONTACT LENS MATERIALS & THEIR PROPERTIES The ideal contact lens material would: Provide sufficient oxygen for normal metabolism Be physiologically inert Be very wettable on the eye Resist lens spoilage especially deposit formation Maintain stable dimensions Be durable when handled by wearers Be transparent with minimal light loss Be optically regular so its optics are predictable Have physical properties which allow the creation and retention of high quality surface Require minimal maintenance by wearers Be easy to fabricate lenses from. Good wettability is necessary for long term lens tolerance Scratch resistance is essential to the maintanace of good optical surface properties Rigidity (rigid lenses) is a key determinant of the minimum lens thickness necessary to resist lens warpage on the eye, particularly if the cornea is astigmatic. Material must be stable if lens parameters are to remain as manufactured. For comfort, good vision and minimal adverse responses, the lens must resist deposits. GENERAL 1. Physical PROPERTIES 2.Chemical 3. Optical 1. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES Oxygen permeability One of the most important properties of a contact lens material is its permeability to oxygen (DK). This property is an inherent material property (like specific gravity or refractive index). Oxygen permeability is a material property and not a lens property It is not a function of lens thickness, shape or back vertex power. The units of 10-11(cm2/s)(mlxmmHg) are often omitted for convenience. In this nomenclature, D is diffusion coefficient- a measure of how fast dissolved molecules of O2 move within the material and 6 K is a constant representing the solubility coefficient or the number of O2 molecules dissolved in the material The DK value is a physical property of a CL material and describes its intrinsic ability to transport O2. It is defined as the rate of oxygen flow under specific conditions through unit area of CL materialof unit thickness when subjected to unit pressure differences. The DK varies with temperature. The higher the temperature the greater the DK. Oxygen transmissibility Oxygen transmissibility is referred to as DK/t, with units of 10(cm2/s)(mlO2/mlxmmHg)/cm. Here t is the lens thickness or material sample thickness and D & K are as defined above. In vivo,there are three main indirect methods which infer the oxygen transmissibility Corneal washing after overnight wear Equivalent oxygen percentage or EOP Corneal oxygen demand following lens removal The DK/t for a particular lens under specified conditions defines the ability of the lens to allow O2 to move from the anterior to posterior surface. The value of t is generally an average lens thickness for powers between + 3.00D. DK/t is however not a physical property of a CL material, but is a specific characteristic related to the sample thickness. Equivalent oxygen percentage The EOP refers to the level of O2 at the surface of the cornea under a CL. For the uncovered cornea exposed to the atmosphere, the amount of O2 available is 20.9%. With the eye close the cornea receives 8%, whereas to avoid oedema the EOP should be 9.9% for DW lenses (DK/t=24) & 17.9% for EW (DK/t=87). EOP therefore states that, the oxygen conc. of a gas mixture (the balance is nitrogen & H2O vapour) which produces a corneal response is equivalent to that resulting from wearing the CL. Low DK/t can result in corneal changes: Epithelial microcysts Thought to be spherules of disorganized cellular growth, necrotic tissue & cellular debris which accumulate between epithelial cells and which probably contain metabolic by-products. As DK/t of lenses increases, the incidence of microcysts decreases in both DW % EW Polymegathism An increase in the range of endothelial cell sizes believed to be a result of hypoxia. Corneal pH An acidic shift results from CO2 retention Oedema Oedema-induced reduction in the efficacy of the endothelial pump results in fluid retention and swelling of the cornea. Endothelial blebs Wettability Sessile drop (water-in-air) A drop of water is placed on the test surface. The angle between the tangent to the drops surface at the point of contact and the horizontal test surface (thelal) is measured. A zero angle signifies a completely wettable surface A low angle signifies a somewhat wettable surface A large angle (esp >90) signifies poorly wettable surface When the bubble is expanded by adding more water, the advancing angle is determined. By withdrawing some water, the drop decreases in size and the receding angle can be measured. Receding angles are usually smaller (indicating better wetting), because the angle involves surfaces previously wetted. 7 What do we require from CL material? Biocompatibility All lens materials must be biocompatible since they are in intimate contact with a physically and physiologically sensitive organ for extended periods of time. In particular, the material should contain virtually no leachable untreated chemical components which may affect the cornea and/or conjunctiva Ease of manufacture From a manufacturer’s point of view, ease of manufacture is essential. A CL material should: Be homogenous Have consistent mechanical properties Be stress free and dimensionally stable Be durable and resist heating Be easy to polish/retain surface finish Have predictable hydration characteristics 2. Chemical properties Most contact lens materials are polymers or macro moleclecs. Polymers are long chain high molecular wts made of many smaller repeating units called monomers, linked together by covalent bonds. The numbers of monomers in a particular chain is known as the degree of polymerization which may be 100 or 10000 for most classes of plastics. The molocular wts should be between 10,000 and 1million. When the monomers are of one type the polymer is called homoploymer. If the polymer is of two or more type it is called co- polymer. A homo or co- polymer can also be linear . eg linear homopolymer, liner random copolymer or linear alternating or regular co-polymer and graft co-polymer. or branched 3. Optical Properties Material must be transparent with little light transmission loss Material must be optically homogenous i.e, its refractive index should not be subject to regional variation unless such variation is intentional and well controlled. 1. Physical SPECIFIC PROPERTIES 2. Chemical 3. Optical RIGD CONTACT LENS Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) The properties of PMMA lenses are easily shaped on lathe, non allergenic, stable, very transparent, somewhat hydrophobic and DK=0 CH l H2C-C – CH 8 l C=O l O l CH2 Methylmethacrylate It is thermoplastic, which may be heat-set to take any desired shape. PMMA may also be manufactured to have thermosetting properties, which means that there are increased cross-links, providing greater rigidity and less susceptibility to becoming scratched. SOFT CONTACT LENSES Flexibility and hydrophilicity mark the very important advantages of the widely used hydrogel soft contact lenses. A large varietyof plastics is now employed in the many types of soft contact lenses now available. The first soft contact lenses were composed of 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA) CH l -CH3-C-CH3 l COOCH3CH2OH Methlacrylate 2-hydroxylethyl When polymerized, it becomes polyhydroxylethylmethacrylate (pHEMA). With the addition of a small amount of cross-linking. It is still the most commonly used soft lens plastic at present. Its water content can be increased above the usual limit of 38% by the addition of other monomers. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), Methacrylic acid (MA),methylmethacrylate (MMA), Diacetone acrylamide (DAA), Glyceryl methacrylate (GMA), Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). pHEMA, PVP = vifilicon A High water content (WC) pHEMA, DAA, MA = bufilicon A low/high WC pHEMA, PVP, MA = Perfilicon A high WC Forming a copolymer The degree of cross-linking can have a profound effect upon the physical characteristic of the plastic. A monomer commonly used for this, is ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA). Other monomers may be added to HEMA to Form a copolymer. Poly vinyl pyrrolidone in combination with pHEMA forms a copolymer (vifilicon A) used in the manufacture of higher water hydrogels. Water content is one variable that can be easily controlled by the choice of copolymers. Gas permeability increases with WC. Other factors in the overall performance of a SCL plastic are relative stiffness or softness, fragility, and the attraction of the plastic for foreign chemical debris from the tear film. The formation of copolymer(s) -HEMA-Vinyl -HEMA-Vinyl Pyrrolidone pyrrolidone l / I / EGDMA 9 / / -vinyl Pyrrolidone (long chain) -HEMA-Vinyl pyrrolidone Soft contact lens materials Physical compatibility Mechanical properties of the lens in combination with its fit must allow for lens movement The lens material must be flexible enough, especially in thicker lenses, to allow the lens to conform somewhat to the anterior eye’s topography. This ensures comfort and satisfactory physiological performance. Oxygen permeability of soft CLs is influenced by: Water content The higher the water content, the greater the DK. This is believed to be the result of oxygen dissolving in H2O especially if it is unbound (free) Chemistry of polymer Mechanical properties of the lens in combination with its fit must allow for lens movement. The lens material must be flexible enough, especially in thicker lenses, to allow the lens to conform somewhat to the anterior eye’s topography. This ensures comfort and satisfactory physiological performance. Oxygen permeability of soft CLs is influenced by: Water content The higher the water content, the greater the DK. This is believed to be the result of oxygen dissolving in H2O, especially if it is unbound (free) Chemistry of polymer The packing density of a material’s molecules influences the ease with which O2 may pass through the material. If large, open, but rigid side molecules are present, the packing density is limited and the permeability is enhanced. Method(s) of water retention The greater mobility of free water enhances DK Temperature Higher temperatures increase agitation of molecules, resulting in an increase in potential intermolecular space and easier passage of oxygen through the material. DKs are often quoted at eye temperature (34oc) pH as the pH of the lens environment decreases (becomes more acidic) so too does the water content, and as it increases(becomes more alkaline or basic) the water content increases. Tonicity The tonicity of the surrounding medium (tears or lens care pdts) can affect the water content. Hypertonic solutions decrease the water content, hypotonic solutions increase it. Water content Influences Oxygen permeability Refractive index Rigidity (handling) Durability Minimum thickness to prevent pervaporation Environmental susceptibility including spoilage. Higher water content lenses, especially if ionic, are more easily spoiled and/or influenced by their environment. 10 Lens care choice Soft lens materials DK@34oC Water content DK <40% 5-8 40-55% 7-19 >55% 18-28 Low water content (advantages) Less susceptible to environmental influences more stable parameter More rigid, easier to handle Virtually any lens care product can be used Ease of manufacture Greater reproducibility More wettable High water content (disadvantages) Greater fragility More deposit prone More susceptible to environmental influences Lower refractive index More difficult to manufacture Less stable parameters Lower reproducibility Cannot be made too thin Hard gas-permeable lenses Corneal lenses represent the majority of lenses fitted today. In the past PMMA was the usual material. It is easily shaped on a lathe, non-allergenic, stable, very transparent and somewhat hydrophobic and very slightly gas permeable A newer plastic – cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) the first generation of gas permeable plastics were introduced in 1970’s Possibly more wettable than PMMA but were very unstable with strong tendency to warp. Not popular these days. Introduction of Silicon-PMMA copolymer plastics lenses that are very gas permeable, stable, non toxic and easily shaped. Disadvantage- increased brittleness and excessive flexibility. The introduction of fluorosoilicon acrylate brought another phase of unremarkable success in RGP with fluorine as the vehicle for oxygen transfer. Generally, the base curve, diameter, power and type of plastic with its colour are given. Thickness is sometimes a necessary part of the prescription. 11 Gas-permeable lens materials are given the suffix-focon and classified according to the chemical groups shown in the table 1 below Chemical group classification of hard lens materials(By courtesy of Association of CL manufacturers) Group 1a- Essentially pure polymethylmethacrylate (99%) DK=0 Group 1b-Copolymers of PMMA with not more than 10% max of other monomers that may alter hardness, wettability and stability DK=0 Group 2a- Essentially pure cellulose acetate butyrate (90%) DK=2-8 Group 2b- Copolymers of mixtures of CAB and other monomers. Group 3- Copolymers of one or more siloxanylmethacrylates, plus other water active monomers and crosslinking agents DK=6 Group 4- Hard lens materials formed from polysiloxanes Group 5- Copolymers of one or more alkylmethacrylate and/or siloxanylmethacrylates, plus other water active monomers, cross-linking agents, & at least 5% by wt of a fluoroalkylmethacrylate or other fluorine containing monomers DK=20 Hard gas-permeable lenses are therefore available in a wide range of materials & DKs. Oxygen considerations, however, must take into account: The barrier effect, which reduces the DK on the eye to approximately 55% of that measured in air in the gas/gas situation Centre & average lens thickness For physiological reasons, lenses should be as thin as possible,although in practical terms making them too thin is counte-productive since they are very likely to distort throughout the power range & also become too brittle. In most cases, a realistic minimum centre thickness is 0.14mm, even for high minus powers. A. Cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) Cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) was one of the first non-PMMA materials introduced in 1977. By modern standards, its DK(b/w 4 & 8) is low, and it is now fitted infrequently. Itsmain difficulty when manufactured by traditional lathing methods is dimensional instability due to lack of cross-links. However, when manufactured by moulding, this problem was largely overcome, and lenses such as conflex and Persecon E have given very good clinical results. Advantages Good wettability Relatively inert Does not attract protein Low breakage rate Very low incidence of CLIPC Disadvantages Low DK Moulding necessary for dimensional stability Scratches easily Corneal adhesion in some cases. Lens flexure and distortion on toric conrneae with tight lids Silicon acrylates (siloxanes) Silicon acrylates are coplopymers in varying propoertions of acrylate(PMMA), which provides lens rigidity & silicon which controls the degree of oxygen permeability. Oxygen permeability results from the existence of the siloxane bonds which permit oxygen to migrate freely along them. Also included are cross-linking agents to improve the strength of the material and wetting agents to improve the strength of the material and wetting agents such as methacrylic acid to improve the naturally hydrophobic properties of silicon. They give superior 12 oxygen and physiological performance compared with CAB and most have stood the test of time in terms of dimensional stability and optical and mechanical results. They are routinely tilted for daily wear and to a limited degree have been used for extended wear. Table 2 Silicon acrylates Lens DK@35oC Polycon II 12 Boston II 15 Parapem O 15 Boston IV 26.7 DK 43 43 Parapem EW 56 Advantages of silicon acrylates Wide range of materials available Low to medium DKs available Good dimensional stability Good vision with limited lens flexure Good scratch resistance Disadvantages Attract protein from tears Some materials are brittle with a breakage problem Some incidence of CLIPC High incidence of 3 & 9oclock staining Fluorosilicon acrylates Fluorosilicon acrylates are composed of fluoromonomers and siloxy acrylate monomers. The addition of fluorine atoms to replace some of the hydrogen present in methacrylate monomers improves surface wettability, tear film stability and deposit resistance as well as increasing oxygen permeability. The solubility of oxygen in fluoro-materials is enhanced & so higher DKs can be achieved (table 3) Table 3 Fluorosilicon acrylates Lens DK@35oC Fluoroperm 30 (Fluorocon 30) 30 Boston ES 31 Fluoperm 60 (Fluorocon 60) 65 Equalens 71 Fluoroperm 90 95 Quantum 92 Boston 7 73 Equalens 125 125 Aquila 143 Fluoroperm 151 151 Optacryl F 160 Quantum 2 210 Alternatively, moderate DKs can be achieved with a lower siloxy acrylate content and hence provide improved wettability. The silicon content ranges from 5-7% with Boston 7 to 16-18% with Fluoroperm 90 Advantages Very high DKs possible Suitable for flexible extended wear 13 Better wettability Fewer deposit problems Lower incidence of CLIPC Easy to modify Disadvantages Brittle if too thin Dimensional stability depends on material and manufacture Corneal adhesion in some cases Fluoropolymers Fluoropolymers contain no silicon and have a fluorine content of up to 50% by weight, several times that incorporated into fluorosilicon acrylates. They have so far found limited application despite their high Dk, good surface wettability, good deposit resistance and lack of brittleness. These advantages have been outweighed by problems associated with lens flexure, high specific gravity and cost. COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF PROPERTIES 1 Properties Physical -Arrangement: of polymers, -Porousity and strength PMMA HEMA - linear polymer of MMA, - high. Amorpous and brittle - H2O absorbtion of its own wt when soaked in water. -Permeability to gases - Refractive index n - absorb 0.5 – 1.5% - Contact angle (wettability) - Low 60 -75% relatively hydrophobic - Good for machining & moulding . selective tinting - linear polymer of HEMA Similar to PMMA except for cross linkages of with compounds. - low and stronger but weaker with increasing H2O . Allows HEMA to bind to H2O and further reduction by cross linkages with EDEMA, PMMA, OR PMMA + glycerol or vinyl pyrolidinic acid. - Generally, H2O content of HEMA varies from 5 – 90% But in CL practice we are concerned with H2O content of 30 80%) - High. DK Increases with water content - Dehydrated state after manufacture N= 1.52 Hydrated state. N varies with H2O hydration in its structure.1.43 - 1.53 or (30 -38% dehydrated) Lower, highly hydrophilic - Ease of manufacture &dimentional stability 2 Chemical properties - Chemical Reations - Poor - N =1.49 - RGP Both Weaker with increasing hydration Both - Unaffected by Cpds except Affected by solvents like ketones such as acetones , ester, aromatic - Absorb soluble substances like preservatives for CL soln, due to its high water contents. Reactants in ophthalmic drugs used for eyes which can cause allergic and toxic rxns. Deposits or unwanted surface coating. Greater affinity tha PMMA. 14 - Biocompactibilty - Temperature 3 Optical properties hydrocarbons - Non toxic and inert - Softens at 1250 C Clear, excellent and stable - Non toxic and inert - Softens at 1200 C as a thermo setting plastic Inferior when compared to PMMA OPTICAL PRINCIPLES TO SPECTACLES Both OF CONTACT LENSES COMPARED POWER OF A LENS 1. SURFACE 2. EFFECTIVE 3. VERTEX RIGID CONTACT LENS OPTICS 1. SURFACE POWER This is the power of a curved surface of a lens in diopters or radius of curvature in mm. The power of a spherical CL is the combination of the front and back surfaces. The total refractive power of 2 adjacent surfaces of differing indices of refraction is given by the formula F = (n2 – n1)/r F = power (in dioptres) n1 – index of refraction for 1st medium n2= index of refraction for 2nd medium r= radius of curvature. Power of a lens using surface powers, F = F1 + F2 For a thin ophthalmic lens, where r1 & r2 are large in comparism to the thickness , the formular, F = F1 + F2 holds . F1 = n – n1 / r1 F1 = 1.49 , , F2 = n2 - 1 / r2 , n = 1.49 , n1 = n2 = 1, r1 = 7.5mm, r2 = 7.5mm – 1 / 0.0075 = 65.332 , F2 = 1 – 1.49 / 0.0075 = -65.332 F = 65.332 + (-65.332) = 0 ( A plano lens to be fitted on the cornea) 15 If r2 = 7.00mm, (ie steeper than r1) F2 = - 70.00D. F = 65.33 + (-70.00) = -4.77D Most times in contact lens practice, we talk of curvatures in terms of keractometric values. The keratometer is calibrated for index of refraction as 1.3375 with the cornea in mind. When used to determine the surface power or radius of curvature of a glass or plastic lens with a different index of refraction such as PMMA material, we multiply the result with a ratio or conversion factor. 1.49 -1/1.3375 -1 = 1.452, for instance if the keratometer is used to determine the surface power of the plano lens above reads 45.00 for a glass or plastic lens with n = 1.49, the true value will be 45.00 x 1.452 = 65.34D (the two values are close as you can see about 0.01D) NOTE: The keratometric estimated reading of the corneal curvature is 89.76% but the accuracy of the actual measurement is 89.36%. Surface power can also be obtained using the instrument 2. VERTEX OR NEUTRALIZING POWER The power of a lens can also be determined using the reciprocal of the focal length. I / f. This method has a limitation in that 2 lenses of the same power with different radii will have different focal lengths. A better formular is the vertex or neutralizing power. This is the reciprocal of the focal length measured from the vertex place on the surface of the lens Contact lens have short radii of curvature and is regarded as a thick lens. The total power when t is not equal to zero is less than when t =0. That is for a thick lens F = F1 + F2 - ( t/n) F1. F2 If the thickness for the last lens parameters = 0.30mm, F = -3.75 instead of – 4.77 for thin lens formular. Using the last parameter for the thin lens here Front vertex power, Ffvp = F2/1 – ( t/n) F2 + F1 FFV = -3.26 Back vertex power Fbvp = F1/1 – ( t/n) F1 + F2 Fbvp = -3.80D The back vertex power is more commonly used in the clinic and as such lenses are clearly specified in that form. 3. EFFECTIVE POWER If the power of the required spectacle lens is known, the power of a CL required to correct the same eye can be determined by means of the effective power formula: Fcl = Fsp/1 - dFsp Where Fsp = the power of the spectacle lens, Fcl = the power of the contact lens, vertex distance (in metres). Contact lens power begins to differ by as much as 0.25D from spectacle lens power when it is about +4.50D. Eg a) Fsp = -5.00 , vertex distance = 14mm, Fcl = -5.00/ 1- 0.014(-5.00) = -4.67D b) Fsp = + 5.00 , vertex distance = 14mm, Fc = + 5.00/1 - 0.014(5.00) = 5.39D 16 THE TEAR LENS When a contact lens is placed on the cornea, the lens will often alter the curvature of the air-tear interface but is not expected to alter the refraction taking place at the tear-cornea interface. There is always a tear lens between the contact lens and the cornea even if the base curve of the contact lens equals that of the cornea. So thin that with a thickness less than 0,02mm without any consequential effect on the contact lens – eye optical system. Uair=1.000 u=1.490 ucornea=1.376 utear=1.336 FTL. = F1 + F2 , = n – n1 / r1 FTL = 1.3375-1/0.0078 + n2 - 1 / r2 ,if r1 = 7.8mm, r2 = 8.0mm + 1- 1.3375/0.0080 = 1.00D If r1 = 8.2mm, r2 = 8.0mm , FTL = 1.3375-1/0.0082 + 1- 1.3375/0.0080 = - 1.00D Rule of thumb If a contact lens BC is specified as steeper or flatter than the corneal curvature (i.e. the tearlayer curvature), the power of the lens must be specified 0.50D more minus for each 0.1mm of lens steepening, or 0.5D more plus for each 0.1mm of lens flattening. Spherical tear layer If the tear layer is spherical, and if a contact lens is firm enough so it will retain its curvature while on the eye, the curvature of the tear layer will (i) not change if the radius of curvature of the back surface is the same as that of the tear layer. (ii) steepen if the radius of curvature of the back surface of the lens is steeper than that of the tear layer and (iii) flatten if the radius of curvature of the back surface of the lens is flatter than that of the tear layer. It is obvious that when the curvature of the tear layer is steepened,the eye is made more myopic (SAM) and that when the curvature is flattened, the eye is made more hyperopic (FAP). Fitting steeper or flatter than “K” and Accomodation and the contact lens wearer. A practitioner may decide for one reason or the other to fit a contact lens with a base curve steeper of flatter than the flattest meridian of the cornea. When this is done, the curvature of the tear layer is changed, a steeper lens making the eye more myopic and a flatter lens making the eye more hyperopic. FSP = FCL + FTL + FOR For toric tear lens/toric cornea, a rigid CL with spherical base curve eliminates the astigmatism. 17 FSP = -2.00@90 / -1.00@180 , K : 45.00@90/ 44.00@180 , BC: 44.50@90/ 44.50@180, FTL = -0.50@90/+0.50@180, Compensation = +0.50@90/-0.50@180 New FCL = -1.50@90/-1.50 @180 Contact lens doess not eliminate all the cornea astigmatism but only eliminates the astigmatism measured by the keratometrer .this is because of the difference in index of refraction between the cornea and the tear lens. That means it will only eliminate all spectacle astigmatism refered to the the cornea plane when both have the same axix and magnitude , otherwise there will be residual astigmatism. Residual astigmatism SOFT LENS OPTICS The soft contact lens s flexible and conforms to the cornea surface in situ. This torisity and cornea astigmatism remains Steeping or flatting the base curve does not change the the cornea curvature nor affect the refractive error 18 CONTACT LENS AND NEAR TEST or BINOCULAR VISION RELATIVE TO SPECTACLES 1. ACCOMMODATION NEAR TESTS 2. PHORIA & FUSIONAL VERGENCES 3. OTHER EFFECTS eg Prismatic effect, Retinal image size effect, and the Field of view effect. 1. ACCOMODATION AND THE CONTACT LENS WEARER When a spectacle lens wearer switches to contact lens, the demand on accommodation and convergence are altered in a number of ways. The total effects of these alterations may be negligible or great enough to constitute a major problem. In any event, the practitioner should be aware of their effects, able to predict their occurrence, and if necessary, to take measures to minimize them. Accommodative effort Pascal (1947) pointed out that the dioptre is an unsuitable unit to apply to accommodation for spectacle wearers. This is because the spectacle-wearing hyperope must put more accommodative effort into each dioptre of accommodation than an emmetrope. When contact lenses rather than glasses are fitted the hyperope loses a disadvantage and then myope loses an advantage. The accommodative effort required by an emmetrope, first while wearing glasses and then while wearing contact lenses, can be determined by considering that the refraction of the eye takes place at the corneal plane rather than at the spectacle plane. The myopic patient with CLs has to accommodate more strongly for close vision than the myope wearing glasses. This difference is significant in fitting the myopic prepresbyope (age 35 or more) who desires CLs. Such a patient should be warned before the fitting that reading glasses may be necessary to be used with the CLs for near vision. The change in accommodation is due to the divergence difference at the cornea between the contact lens and the spectacle lens. 19 example 20 2. Accommodative and fusional convergence with CLs The myope will use more accommodative effort with contact lenses than with glasses, and therefore will use correspondingly more accommodative convergence. If the wearer happens to be exophoric at near, the increased amount of accommodative convergence will result in a decreased exophoria and thus,will reduce the need for positive fusional vergence (PFV) Accommodative convergence and Magnification/minification in contact lens and spectacles. However, if the wearer is esophoric at near, the resulting increase in the esophoria will require the use of more negative fusional vergence (NFV) than is required with glasses, which may result in complaints of eye strain. The increase in NFV may bring about adaptation problems, which the practitioner may blame on the ‘fit’ of the lenses. The hyperope wearing contact lenses and using less accommodation will use less accommodative convergence. The patient will be expected to be more exophoric or less esophoric at near than while wearing spectacles. 3. Other effects: (A) Prismatic effect at near with spectacle and contact lens (B) Magnification/minification in cls and spectacles Although it is useful to be aware of the possibilities of controlling image size in various combinations of contact lenses spectacle. It is a known fact that certain amount of anisometropia can result in aniseikonia, 21 hence the knowledge of magnification to aid in the spectacle/contact lens combination in anisometropia is dispensable. When you suspect that there are significant image size differences between the two eyes it may be useful to resort to manipulating the spectacle and contact lens powers. Magnification of any lens system in general is given by the formula: M = 1/1-dp Where: M = magnification d = distance of correcting lens in meters P = power of the CONTACT LENS – EYE correcting lens INTERACTION (A) Field of view CONTACT LENS – EYE INTERACTION 1. ANATOMY 2. PHYSIOLOGY 3. EXAMINATION During CL wear, there is a good interaction between CLs (regardless of the type) and the anterior segment, hence the anatomy and physiology are considered. The anterior segment is composed of the eyelids (and margins), conjunctiva, sclera, cornea, precorneal tear film, limbus and iris. A knowledge of the anatomy and physiology of the eye is required to detection of changes induced by disease of CLs wear this will also help to facilitate the diagnosis of such changes. 1 & 2 ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY CORNEA Corneal tissue is transparent and avascular, consisting of 3 layers and 2 membranes. It is protects the ocular structure contributes about 70 % of the refractive power of the eye. Dimensions of the conea Corneal shape is elliptical because the encroachment of the opaque limbus into the cornea’s superior and inferior borders. Horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID) is 10.6mm on average. These may be about 0.1mm less in females. Corneal area is 1.3cmsq or 1/14 of the total area of the globe 22 Sagittal depth of the cornea is 2.6mm with variations largely dependent on the radius of corneal curvature (S= (d/2)2 D/2000(u-1) 23 0.52mm (520um) in the centre and 0.67mm (670um) at the limbus (Maurice, 1969). The corneal is not symmetrical and corneal curvature flatten towards the periphery . Corneal shape: The cornea is a meniscus lens The average front apical radius is 7.8mm (corneal power = 43.27D with an instrument calibrated for a refractive index of 1.3375) 24 The average back optical radius is 6.5mm gives the posterior cornea a power of -6.15D (assumptions naq = 1.336 and npost Cor=1.376. rpost cor=6.5mm) The actual refractive index of the cornea (ncornea) is 1.376 The cornea is not optically homogenous. However, the actual refractive indices of the individual layer are not known accurately. Most values are for the homogenized corneal material. Little light is reflected from internal layer interfaces, suggesting minimal refractive index differences. However, Nground subst = 1.354 & ncollagen = 1.47 Corneal composition The corneal is composed of 78% water 15% collagen 5% other proteins 1% glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) 1% salts These are wet weight figures The epithelium accounts for approx 10% of cornea’s wet weight. Transverse section of the cornea (Warurick, 1976) The cornea consists of 5 layers. Epithelium Bowman’s membrane Stroma (substantia propria) Descemet’s membrane. Endothelium Examination and assessment of the cornea is best done using the slit lamp biomicroscope. Observation of a tansverse section of the cornea requires a narrow slit beam, together with high magnification. (a) Epithelium The outer surface is smooth and regular to provide a tear layer substrate. It is uniform in thickness and benefits from an orderly replacement scheme after desquamation. Any slight irregularity is compensated for by the overlying tear film. Layers of the epithelium (Hogan et al, 1971) The epithelium is made up of 3 types of cells Squamous cells Wing cells Columnar (or basal) cells (deepest) The outer surface is smooth and regular, allowing it to act as a tear layer substrate. It is of uniform thickness and benefits from an orderly replacement process following desquamation. The epithelium is avascular and is usually transparent. (b) Bowman’s membrane It is an acellular tissue with a thickness of 8-14um. It is thicker in the peripheral 1/3 and thins as it round off at the limbus. It is usually differentiated or modified anterior stroma and is sometimes called the anterior limiting lamina. It is composed mainly of collagen fibrils and some ground substances. The randomly dispersed collagen fibrils are some 24-27nm thick and are therefore smaller than the stroma fibrils (32-36nm). They are also less densely packed than the stroma fibrils. Damage to this membrane results in laying down of fibrous scar tissue leading to permanent opacity. 25 (c) Stroma The stroma is approximately 0.5mm thick centrally (90% of corneal thickness). It is composed almost entirely of collagenous lamellae whose turnover time is 12 months or more. It contains 2-3% keratocytes (also known as corneal fibroblasts) and about 1% ground substance (giycosaminoglycans). It is very hydrophilic. It is responsible for Exact sparing of fibrils Water imbibitions pressure of the cornea. This is due largely to their hydrophilicity. Keratocytes Interspersed between collagenous lamellae Thin, flat cells 10µm in diameter with long processes 5-50µm of intercellular space. Joined together by macular accludens or hemidesmosomes (d) Descemet’s membrane 10-12µm thick Structureless Slightly elastic Secreted by the endothelium Very regularly arranged stratified layer (e) Endothelium A single layer of cells in direct contact with the aqueous layer .18-20µm in diameter and 5µm thick. Its pump mechanism maintains the cornea’s fluid balance, which is in turn responsible for transparency. No mitosis occur, but enlargement and spreading of existing cells take place. Age-induced endothelial cell degeneration/loss combined with an inability to produce lost cells, results in a decrease in uniform (pleomorphism), thickness and cell density of the endothelium. These age-related changes manifest themselves as an increase in the range of cell size. This is termed polymegattism. The details of the endothelium can be appreciated by specular reflection with high magnification of 25-40x Endothelial ultrastructure Organelles are engaged in active transport (an active pump) which is necessary for hydration control and protein synthesis for secretory purposes There are large numbers of mitochondria which are more numerous around the nucleus. Vasculature band nerve supply Peripheral corneal vasculature The peripheral cornea and sclera adjacent to schlemm’s canal are supplied by conjunctival, episcleral and sclera terminals of the circumcorneal vessels. These vessels play a minor role in corneal nutrition. The rest of the cornea is normally avascular. Corneal innervations The cornea has one of the richest sensory nerve supplies in the body. It is supplied by the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve (N5) Nerve The nerve fibres become more visible when the cornea is oedematous. Medullar changes of corneal nerves These are about 30 nerves entering the cornea which appears as axon bundles near the limbus. The cornea nerves lose their medullar coats (myelin sheath) before their first division, a division which is usually dichotomous. 26 The sensitivity of the cornea is greatest centrally and in the horizontal meridian. It reduces towards the vertical meridian and the periphery. Conjunctival sensitivity increases from a minimum at the limbus towards a maximum at the fornix and lid margins. Sensitivity reduces with age and contact lens wear. Conjunctiva .The conjunctiva is a mucous membrane consisting of loose,vascular connective tissue. It is transparent. It is continous : The lining of the globe beyond the cornea The upper and lower fornices The innermost lower portion of the upper and lower eyelids The skin at the lid margin. The cornea epithelium at the limbus . The nasal mucosa at the lacrimal puncta. Regional Divisions of the Conjunctiva Palpebral: Conjunctiva lining the inner eyelids and extending to the margins. Fornices: Loose conjuntival tissue that is continous with the palpebral and bulbar conjuuctiva. Bulbar: Conjunctival tissue overlying the sclera and limbus. Plica semilunaris: Fold of conjunctival at the inner canthus, appearing as a biconcave crescent partly covered by the caruncle. Caruncle: Conjunctival tissue nasal to the plica semilunaris and defining the medial canthus. Conjunctival glands Goblet cells are : Unicellular and sero-mucous secreting Found in the epithelial layer. Absent near the limbus and lid margin. More numerous in the bulbar region. Glands of wolfring are: Contributors to the aqueous layer of tear film Similar in structure in to the lacrimal gland Located near the fornices in the conjunctival stroma Approximately 20 in the upper and the lower conjunctival More numerous laterally. Conjunctival Arteries The conjunctiva is supplied by Palpebral branches of the nasal lacrimal arteries of the lids Larger branches from peripheral and marginal arteries arcades Anterior ciliary arteries. The limbus is: A transition zone of the epithelia and connective tissues of the cornea,the conjunctiva and the sclera combined. An anatomical surgical procedures,biomicroscopy and contact lens fitting. 27 Limbal function Provides limited nourishment to the peripheral cornea via the limbal vasculature. Site of the aqueous humour drainage system via the schlemm’s canal. This system is important for the maintenance of IOP. Limbal vasculature Begins with arteries from the superficial marginal plexus which originates from the anterior ciliary arteries. There are two types of limbal vessels: Terminal arteries which form the peripheral cornea arcades. Recurrent arteries which form the peripheral arcades which pass through the palisades of Vogt to supply the prelimbal conjunctiva. The blood then returns via the venous system. Limbal vasculature Limbal nerves arise from the intrascleral and conjunctival nerves. These originate from the long ciliary nerves. Innervations extends into the trabecular meshwork and the cornea. Note that: Th deep cornea has few nerves The cornea adjacent top descemet’s membrane has no nerves. LACRIMAL GLAND Each lacrimal gland is located in a depression called the lacrimal fossa(fossa glandulae lacrimalis) in the supero-temporal orbit just behind the orbital margin. This lacrimal fossa is one of two in each orbit,the other is a more obvious but smaller oval depression in the anterior nasal orbital wall in the lacrimal sac is located. The lacrimal gland is divided by the levator palpebral superioris muscle(LPS) into: Larger upper orbital portion Smaller lower palpebral portion Lacrimal gland: innervations Lacrimal gland innervations comes from the lacrimal branch of the ophthalmic division of the trigerminal nerve(CN5)-afferent, facial (CN7),-efferent and the superior cervical ganglion and carotid plexus(sympathetic). It is believed that the sphenopalatine ganglion provides parasympathetic innervation to the lacrimal gland via very fine fibres(the rami lacrimalis) passing directly to the lacrimal gland. The lacrimal gland has up to 12 ducts 2-5 from the upper (orbital)portion 6-8 from the lower (palpebral) portion The ducts open into the superior palpebral conjunctiva. Accessory lacrimal glands Glands of Krause Supply the aqueous phase of basal tears Glands of Wolfring Supply the aqueous phase of basal tears Glands of Zeis (lids) Sebaceous glands Associated with lash follicles Partially supply the lipid layer of tears 28 Meibomian glands(lids) Sebaceous glands Main supply of the lipid layer of tears 25 in the upper lid and 20 in the lower lid. The glands in the lower lids are shorter Oil on the lid margins prevents tear overflow Goblet cells Situated in the epithelium of the conjunctiva Provide the mucoid layer of tears. TEAR FILM Tear Distribution The tears are distributed by the following mechanisms Normal and voluntary eyelid action with each blink resurfacing the pre-corneal tear film Normal and voluntary movements of the globe The tears from a lacrimal ‘river’ on the lid margin and a lacrimal ‘lake’ at the inner canthi Tear flow Tear flow is aided by: Capillary action Gravity Blinking Distribution of tear volumes Precorneal 1um Tear meniscus 3ul Cul-de-sac 4ul Tear film stability The mucin layer is spread by the action of the lids. The wettability of the epithelium is enhanced by the renewed mucin layer. Tear thinning leaves an oil & mucin admixture which does not wet the epithelium leading to break-up of the tear film. Mechanics of tear film spreading Upward lid movement draws the aqueous component over the cornea and conjunctiva. This is followed by the lipid layer spreading over the surface. This increases tear film thickness and stability. Tear flow: lid closure Movement of the medial canthus Contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle causes lid closure with a scissor like action towards the nose. Lid closure propels the tears towards the medial canthus. Lacrimal pump The upper part of the lacrimal sac is distended by a negative pressure which draws tears into the drainage system. On eye opening this action is reversed. Capillary action and gravity play a part in tear drainage. The turnover rate of tears is approximately 16% per mm Tear flow directions The compressive force of blinking on the tears combined with the scissorlike action of lid closure, gives a directional flow towards the medial canthus. Tear Drainage 29 Tears are drawn into the upper and lower canaliculi via the upper and lower lacrimal puncta located on the lacrimal papillae. The upper and lower canaliculi join and then almost immediately enter the lacrimal sac. The tears pass through the naso lacrimal duct and finally into the nose. Exit to the nasolacrimal duct is guarded by the valve of Hasner. The valve of Hasner prevents reflux of nasal contents into the nasolacrimal duct or lacrimal sac. The normal action of the lids can also activate the valve of Hasner. Lid closure closes the valve of Hasner. The Eyelids. The eyelids are a 4 layered structure. Cutaneous layer (the skin) The skin of the eyelids is atypical being loose and elastic having very few hair and containing no subcutaneous fat. It has 3 layers and is rich in blood vessels, lymphatics and nerves. Muscular layer This layer consists mainly of the oval, concentric orbicularis oculi muscle involving the lids and orbital margins. It also contains the smooth Muller’s muscle which helps the levator palpebrae superioris(LPS) keep the eye open when awake. Fibrous tissue layer This layer is made up of tarsal plate, orbital septum and Meibomian glands. The semi rigid tarsal plates are made of fibrous and elastic tissue arising from the medial and lateral palpebral ligaments. The orbital septum is a thin layer of elastic connective tissue. It is fused with the sheaths of the LPS. The Meibomian glands are longer in the upper lids and are embedded in the tarsal plate. Each gland opens into the lid margin. Mucosal layer This mucosal layer is largely is largely the palpebral conjunctiva. Meibomian Gland Array. 20 (lower lid) and 25 (upper lid) vertical glands situated parallel to each other. These glands are located in the tarsal plates. The orifice of each gland is located along the inner side of the lid margins. Meibomian glands are well developed sebaceous glands. Blood vessels of the eyelids. There are two blood sources of arterial bloodsupply to the eyelids Facial system Orbital system The palpebral vascular structure provides oxygen to the cornea via palpebral conjunctival vessels when the lids are closed. Physiology Cornea physiology is primarily concerned with The sources of energy which fuel the cornea metabolic activity Corneal transparency and its maintenance Corneal permeability Water 30 The endothelium has greater water permeability than the epithelium The epithelium has low permeability to lactic acid which moves through the stroma to the aqueous humour. This lactate induced osmotic gradient towards the posterior interface produces an influx of water. Oxygen Oxygen is needed to maintain corneal integrity and derived mostly from the palpebral conjunctiva and the limbal vasculature (especially in closed eye circumstances) Carbon dioxide The cornea is highly permeable to carbondioxide. The DKCO2 is about 7x DKO2. This is necessary to resist pH and metabolic changes in the cornea. Oxygen. Oxygen is the most important metabolite The cornea derives its oxygen supply from several sources Atmospheric (main supply) via the tear film Capillaries of the limbal region Aqueous humour via the corneal endothelium Capillaries of the palpebral conjunctiva Carbon dioxide efflux carbon dioxide from the cornea and aqueous humour pass out through the tears during open eye conditions. During closed eye conditions,carbon dioxide exita through the aqueous humour. The amount of carbon dioxide that diffuses freely from thr cornea for every 5uL O2/cm2 cornea/hour consumed is 2uL Co2/cm2 cornea/hour. Contact lenses are barrier to oxygen and CO2 transmission. Contact lenses act as a barrier to oxygen influx and carbondioxide efflux. Oxygen tension at various levels of the cornea in open and closed eye circumstances, for central and superior corneal locations, without a contact lens are: Open eye, central cornea: 20.9% Open eye, suoerior cornea: 10.4% Closed eye, central cornea 7.7% Closed eye, superior cornea 6.6% With contact lens Open eye, central cornea: 15% Open eye, superior cornea: 10% Closed eye, central cornea: 5% Closed eye, superior cornea: 0% METABOLISM- Corneal energy by carbohydrate metabolism. Sources of glucose: corneal metabolism. The aqueous humour contains 3.0umol/ml of glucose. Epithelial glucose is derived from mainly (90%) from the aqueous humour of the anterior chamber. The limbal vasculature and tears supply less than 10% of the needs of the epithelium. Glucose consumption 38-90ug/hr of glucose is consumed 40-66% of this is used by the epithelium Glucose metabolic pathway Produces lactate (aerobic) + 2ATP 31 Tricarboxylic Acid cycle Aerobic (along with epithelial cell mitochondria produces carbon dioxide, water and 36ATP Hexose monophosphate shunt Aerobic under the hexose monophosphate shunt produces NADPH, carbondioxide, water and ATP. TEARS Tear functions Optical: form and maintain a smooth optical surface over the cornea. Physiologic: maintain a moist environment for the epithelium of the cornea, conjunctiva and lids. Bacteriocidal/Bacteriostatic: antibacterial props are impacted by the prescence of tear lysozyme, lactoferrin, B-lysin and immunological cells. The leucocyte pathway is invoked in the case of injury. Metabolic: transport of nutrients and metabolic pdts to and from the cornea via tears. Protective: elutes and dilutes noxious stimuli, foreign bodies from the eyes anterior surface. Mucin layer Converts the hydrophobic corneal epithelium to a hydrophilic surface (extremely hydrophilic) Greatly enhances epithelial wettability. Maintain stability of tear film Secreted by Goblet cells of conjunctiva Aqueous layer The only layer involved in true tear flow Vehicle for most of tears component Transfer medium for oxygen and carbon dioxide. Produced by the lacrimal gland and accessory lacrimal glands of Wolfring and Krause. Lipid layer Main function is anti-evaporative Prevents tear fluid overflow Anchored at the orifices of Meibomian gland Some produced by the Zeis glands Contains some dissolved lipid and mucins Tear proteins 98.2% water, n=1.336: some glucose (mainly fromaqueous humour. pO2= 155mmhg (closed eye) Tear dimension Volume 6.5-8uL. Flow rate: 0.6uL: Turn over rate 16%/min 32 4. EXAMINATION INSTRUMENTATION/TECHNIQUES Slit-lamp biomicroscopy keratometry Burton lamp Placido disc Klein keratoscope Slit-lamp biomicroscope The biomicroscope derives its name from the fact that it enables the practitioner to observe under magnification the living tissues of the eye. The biomicroscope consists of an illumination system, and the necessary mechanical apparatus for their support and coordination. Types Haag-Streit and Zeiss biomicroscopes. Methods of Illumination Direct methods The slit beam and microscope are focused at the same point to give; Diffused illumination; Direct focal illumination Diffuse illuminatiom illumination is used for a general look at the ocular tissues under low magnification. In direct illumination, either a wide or narrow slit can be used. Under direct focal illumination, three types of beam can be modified (narrow slit) Parallelepiped (medium width) Optic section (1mm) Conical beam (wider slit with reduced height) In direct parallelepiped, the beam and microscope are focused at point of interest. Slit width: medium (2mm) Mirror: click stop Angle: 30-45o Mag: Begin with low (20X) Using the parallelepiped, the corneal stroma (which makes up 90% of corneal thickness) will appear to be optically empty in the absence of any opacities. The normal corneal stroma contains sensory nerve fibres which are fine and silky in appearance, slitting into branches at acute angles. By reducing the width of the parallelepiped to a much narrower slit (say 1mm), optic section is formed. Optic Section This is used to examine the integrity of the cornea, define the depth of foreign body or scar, observe the naturally occurring structures such as nerves of the cornea. When the width of the optic is increased to medium and the height reduced to about half, a conical beam is formed. Conical beam Observe small number of cells and flares in the anterior chamber. INDIRECT ILLUMINATION 33 The beam is focused on an opaque or translucent structure located to one side of the area to be observed by the microscope and this area is observed somewhat in shadow by virtue of scattered light. Sclerotic scatter (limbal) If a slit of medium is directed towards the limbus from a wide angle, the scattering of light by the cornea at the limbus will cause the appearance of a halo all the way around the cornea at the limbus. The light transverses the cornea by total internal reflection. Useful in the detection of corneal abrasion, embedded foreign bodies, oedema and other conditions that may occur in connection with contact lens wear. Specular reflection Using a slit of medium width, if the source and the microscope are placed at equal angles from the normal to the corneal surface, the image of the source will be observed. This method is particularly useful in observing both the corneal epithelium and endothelium. Also, examination of this bright area, looking for any debris or oiliness, gives a quantitative assessment of the tear film. Changing focus to the rear of the beam section brings an area of the endothelium into view. In summary, specular reflection is used to assess the integrity of the corneal endothelium; mosaic palor is observed slightly to the right of the reflection; also detect central corneal clouding (CCC) due to contact lens over wear. Slit width: medium Mirror: click stop Angle: 45o Mag: High NB: The endothelium looks like a patch of beaten gold to the side of the much brighter specular zone. RETRO-ILLUMINATION This is also referred to as trans-illumination. Retro-illumination involves focusing the beam on a surface beyond (or behind) the area to be observed. For example, the cornea can be observed in retro-illumination by illuminating the iris and focusing the microscope on the cornea, observing the cornea in the light reflected back from the iris. Used for assessing the density and boundary of corneal lesions. Direct retro-illumination To differentiate between lesion types spanning over transparent tissues. Slit width: 2-3mm Mirror: off clickstop Angle: 45o Mag: Low to Moderate Indirect retro-illumination Check the holes in the iris as light bounces off the fundus Slit width: 1-2mm Mirror: off clickstop Angle: 45o Mag: Low to moderate. Both the cornea and conjunctival are then examined for evidence of epithelial staining using a broad scanning beam and the cobalt blue filter. A yellow filter (Kodak Wratten 12) in the observation system gives enhanced contrast and assists identification. Other stains used are rose Bengal and less commonly, alcian blue. Handheld Burton lamp This can also be used for broad examination of the lid, fornices, conjunctivae, cornea apart from its use in fluorescein evaluation of hard contact lens fit. KERATOMETERS AND AUTOKERATOMETERS. Keratometers measure the curvature of the central cornea over an area of approximately 3-6mmto determine The radii of curvature 34 The directions of the principal meridians The degree of corneal astigmatism The presence of any corneal distortion The variable doubling keratometer is one of two types. The mires have a fixed separation. The separation of the mires images is found by varying the doubling power. The Bausch and Lomb (B & L) keratometer has two variable doubling devices and two sets of fixed mires. Both principal meridians can therefore be measured simultaneously and it is called a one position instrument. Eye piece focus: wind the eye piece fully counter clockwise (most plus direction). View the graticule through the eye piece and slowly turn it back clockwise until the graticule cross-hairs are in sharp focus. Then stop. Patient’s comfort: Adjust the instrument height and chin rest height so that your patient is comfortable with head against the fore head rest. Check the patient’s outer canthus is more or less level with the eye-level mark on the head rest. Instrument alignment: Move the instrument vertically so that the height is level with the subject. Patient’s fixation: Patient looks down the objective and may see (a) A reflection of his own eye or (b) a small fixation light. You may have to adjust the instrument for him to fixate properly. If no fixation target is visible, the patient should look down the objective, at the centre of the aperture. Some patients prefer to have their other eye occluded. Mire Alignment: Use the vertical and horizontal drums to adjust the mires centrally in your view through the eye piece. Move the keratometer in and out of focus. Axis location: rotate the body of the keratometer until the axis markers on the mires are correctly aligned. If you make an incorrect adjustment at this stage you will be able to correct it later. Doubling adjustment: adjust the doubling until the mires just touch. Other meridian adjustment: with one piece instruments, adjust and align the 2nd meridian in exactly the same way as you adjusted the first. Record your results: you should now record all the information from the keratometer as follows: FLAT K @ meridian 44.00D @ 180 STEEPER K @ meridian 45.00D @ 90 (Flat K – steep K) X Flat -1.00DC X 180 AM 44.00D This is lens power required to neutralize corneal astigmatism. This astigmatic power, however, may differ in amount, axis and even sign from that which the patient finally accepts as the subjective refraction (i.e. corneal astigmatism = refractive astigmatism) NOTE: Obtain readings quickly to minimize accommodation Take three readings of each eye. Measured values should be within 0.50D and 5o of each other. Internal astigmatism average -0.50D X 90 (usually crystalline lens) for the population. Extending the range Radii steeper than the range of the instrument (e.g. keratoconus) can be obtained by placing a +1.25D trial lens (add 8D to the steeper radius) in front of the keratometer objective. At the flatter end, the range can be similarly extended with a -1.00D lens (subtract 6D from the flatter radius). Prior calibration is necessary using steel balls of known radii. In the calibration kit, we have the lenscometer, lens holder and steel balls of different radii of curvature [40.50D, 42.50D & 44.75D]. calibration can be by direct adjustment of the affected drum by loosening and adjusting for the appropriate value when steel ball is in place or by always adjusting the affected drum with the correction factors. Corneal topographers Keratometer 35 The keratometer can also be used to explore the paracentral and peripheral areas of the cornea by means of a graduated fixation. Autokeratometer Autokeratometers determine the radii and principal meridians along the visual axis. They can also measure peripheral radii at predetermined positions away from the corneal apex (e.g. at 23o and 30o with the Nikon NRK 8000) Placido disc The Placido disc is a flat, circular disc with alternate black and white concentric rings. The width when reflected froman average cornea gives a quantitative assessment of the regularity of the cornea itself. The eye is viewed through a convex lens in the centre of the disc. Klein keratoscope The Klein keratoscope is an internally illuminated version of the Placido disc. Corneal topography TEAR FILM STABILITY The time taken for the tear film to break up following blink cessation Tear BUT Sodium fluorescein instilled unto the eye Tear film monitored under blue light Record occurrence of first dry spot Repeat measurements required due to: Defects in anterior segment Surfactants in paper strip Abnormal eyes may not form a complete film <10s is abnormal 15-45s is considered normal. Non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT) NIBUT is BUT test which does not require staining. Results are more consistent and reliable than those using introduced fluids. Recently, Tear thinning time (T-T-T) was introduced as a form of NIBUT since no fluid is introduced. The patient is comfortably seated with chin rest, forhead on head rest of the Bausch and Lomb keratometer. With the instrument well adjusted, the mires are focused properly. The patient is instructed to blink once and keep the eye open and with the mires well adjusted, the stop watch starts counting while the doctor observes the focusing mire through the objective. The time taken fpr the focusing mire to double with the watch stopped is the T-T-T (which is same as NIBUT) Schirmer’s Test Thin strip of filter paper is bent into an L shape and inserted into the lower fornix. Wet length after a fixed time period (5mins) is measured. Short wet length means a possible dry eye. Test is subject to many artefacts Cheap and readily available Phenol red thread test (PRT) The PRT test was introduced by Hamano et al in 1983. It is Used to assess the basal tear volume More comfortable than Schirmer’s test. 36 Preliminary considerations It is important to discuss the various aspects of CLs at first examination and assess potential suitability in relation to patient expectations, spectacle refraction, ‘k’ readings and slit lamp examination. The discussion, reinforced by introductory patient leaflets, should cover many other related aspects of lens wear and fitting. General health, including allergies, hay fever and systemic drugs Ocular health, previous infections or surgery Vision, nature of Rx, amblyopia Previous contact lens history, success or failure. Reasons for contact lens wear Types of lens currently available Preconceived ideas and misconceptions Outline of fitting procedures What is required of the patient in terms of after care examinations, hygiene and proper use of solutions Fees for both initial fitting and future after care External ocular measurements Certain ocular measurements help us best determine the size and viewing areas of rigid lenses. Measuring the size of the cornea helps us select the proper overall diameter (OAD) of a contact lens. Because the cornea is a transparent tissue and the colored iris behind it is about the same size, we measure the size of the iris that is visible to us with a millimeter rule. We call the measurement the visible iris diameter (VID) and use it to represent the size of the cornea. The palpebral aperture helps us determine the proper lens size. The size of the pupil under ambient and dim illumination is necessary so as to ensure that the optical zone diameter ( where the usable optical power is located) is larger than the pupil in darl conditions. Otherwise, glare and unclear vision may result in low light conditions. Prescription To determine the correct contact lens R, a spectacle refraction is necessary. This may be done with a handheld instrument called a retinoscope, an automated refractor or a manual refractor. Using the retinoscope yields an objective refraction because the contact lens practitioner may obtain a prescription without the patients assistance. Automated refractors are objective as well. A subjective refraction occurs when the practitioner uses the phoropter or trial lens set, asking the patient assist. Most practitioners use the objective refraction as a starting point and refine the prescription with the subjective refraction. This prescription is determined at the spectacle plane (where eye glasses would be as the face), but we need the prescription at the corneal plane (where contact lens would be), so modifications may be necessary. The difference in distance from the spectacle plane to the corneal plane is called the vertex distance and the subsequent prescription change is the vertex distance compensation. Most practitioners use a conversion chart for this computation. TRIAL CONTACT LENS FITTING After placing the contact lens on the eye further refinement may be necessary. Spectacle Rx to contact lens Rx. Depending on the Rx, some adjustments may be required to compensate for vertex distance. Vertex distance takes into account the fact that the CL works ‘on’ the eye. Slight adjustments must be made to the Rx to compensate for the change in the distance for spectacle powers over 4.00D. Remember Fcl = Fsp/1-vd Fsp. There is always another exception. For patients fitted with RGP lenses, an adjustment to the Rx may be neede to compensate for the lacrimal lens which is created. This is where the concept of ‘SAM’ and ‘FAP’ come in. 37 The curvature A contact lens must be curved to fit the curvature of the eye. A corneal CL is composed of curved surfaces that are either spherical or non-spherical (aspheric). The back (concave) surface of a spherical CL can have one or more curves. The central most radius of curvature is called the base curve (BC) & is specified in millimeters. Most BC’s are spherical, which means they are shaped like the surface of a round ball. However, if the patient has a high degree of astigmatism (or differences In the curvatures on the front surface of the eye), a toric BC is required. If you placed the rounded- ball (spherical) BC on such a highly toric cornea may require a toric shaped CL ( two different curvatures) When fitting the back surface of the CL to the front surface of the eye. It is critical that the lens “ride” on the layer of tears properly as the patient blinks . without a good fit , the lens will move unnecessarily about the eye, not position its centrally, be comfortable to the patient and ineffective in correcting vision working the curves. Determining the Rx for an RGP lens takes many factors into account, including the lacrimal lens. We begin with the curvature of the cornea Remember, we obtain this by using the keratometer. The keratometer measures the major meridians of the corneal surface and is recorded in dioptres as K readings. These units are converted to millimeters to specify the back curve of the CL that will fit that eye “k” is the flattest meridian on the cornea and the starting point. The contact lens maybe fit. On K --- The base curve matches that of the cornea sleeper than K --- the base curve is fitted steeper (more curved) than the cornea. Flatter than K --- The base curve is fitted flatter (less curved) than the cornea. There are two considerations when selecting the fitting philosophy of the lens: (1) lens movement and positioning, evaluated by observing how the lens positions and moves on the eye as well as observing the pattern the tears make under the lens and (2) change in the refractive power of the lens, or adjustments made to Rx in order to compensate for the tears or lacrimal lens. Fitting on K—when an RGP CL is fitted on k, no lacrimal lens power is created by the lens fit, therefore no compensation need to be made to the prescription Fitting steeper than k--- A plus(+) lacrimal lens is created by the steeper than k fit, therefore minus (-) power must be added to the contact lens Rx to compensate for the tear layer to obtain the appropriate lens power --- SAM Fitting flatter than k--- A minus (-) lacrimal lens is created by a flatter than k fit, therefore plus (+) power (or less minus) must be added to the CL Rx t0 compensate for the tear layer to obtain the appropriate lens power Worked examples in class BVP = Dx + TL + OR Fluorescein patterns Fitting The central & peripheral fit are independent variables and should always be assessed separately The fitting should be evaluated with the lens both centered on the apex of the cornea & in a decentered position. Lens movement during and after blink should be noted. Lens position after a blink is important Lens movement on eye excursions is also significant. Assessment with fluorescein Appearance (e.g. with modern multicurve designs) The ideal fluorescein pattern should show three fitting areas Alignment or the merest hint of apical clearance over the central 7.00mm 38 Mid-peripheral alignment over about 1.50mm Edge clearance about 0.5mm wide Flat fitting The fitting patterngives a dense central area of dark blue touch surrounded by fluorescein to the edge of the lens. The area of touch is small with an indistinct as opposed to a sharply demarcated border. Fluorescein encroaches beneath the periphery of the central portion where alignment would be expected with a correct fit. The lens is unstable and decentres The entire periphery of the lens shows clearance as a wide area of fluorescein. Blinking gives excessive and rapid lens movement which may be uncomfortable. To correct a flat fit Use a steeper BOZR to improve centration Increase the TD to stabilize the lens Increase the BOZD to give a larger sag and steepen the fit. Use tighter peripheral curves to reduce dynamic forces and the effect of the lids. Use a thinner lens to reduce mobility. Steep fitting Appearance The fluorescein pattern gives central pooling An air bubble is sometimes present with excessive central clearance Heavy bearing is seen at the transition as an area of dark blue touch beyond the central pooling The smaller the area of central pooling, the greater the degree of steepness. The periphery gives only a thin annulus of fluorescein around the lens edge. There is little lens movement on blinking. To correct a steep fit Use a flatter BOZR Decrease the TD to increase lens mobility. Decrease the BOZD to give a smaller sag Use flatter peripheral curves to increase the dynamic forces on the lens Rule of thumb for spherical lenses An increase in the BOZD of 0.50mm requires the BOZR to be flattened by 0.50mm to maintain the same fluorescence pattern RIGID LENS SELECTION Trial sets usually have steps of 10mm although Rx lenses can normally be ordered in 0.05mm steps The preferred fitting for most corneal lenses is alignment or very slightly flatter Trial lens selection is based on keratometry The initial lens usually has a BOZR nearest to flattest ‘K’ The radius must be considered in relation to BOZD. The radius is usually flatter ( e.g.’K’ + 0.10mm) to achieve an alignment fitting Additional factors such as lid tension, BVP, and center of gravity must also be considered (II) Total diameter (TD)—Overall diameter (OAD) TD is chosen on the basis of corneal size to be approximately 2.0mm smaller the HVD. 39 TD depends on the pupil size, especially in low illumination The choice can be regarded as small (<9.20mm), medium (9.20-9.70mm) or large (>9.80mm) Changing to a larger diameter generally stabilizes the fitting, although it does not always have a significant effect on the fluorescence pattern The TD should be evaluated in relation to Back vertex power (BVP) High powers requires larger diameters for lens stability The final choice of diameter also depends on the method of fitting (e.g, whether lid attachment or inerpalpebral) (iii) Back optic zone diameter (BOZD) Often predetermined by the laboratory Depends on the pupil size, especially in low illumination The pupil position must be assessed for aphakes BOZD is chosen to be least 1.50mm larger than the pupil size The choice may be regarded as small (<7.30mm), medium (7.30-7.90mm) or large (>7.90mm) A larger BOZD for a particular radius gives a greater sag and therefore a steeper fitting A smaller BOZD is often chosen with a toric cornea to reduce the area of mismatch A larger BOZD is often chosen to permit a flatter BOZR which gives less flexure on a toric cornea The BOZD should be considered in relation to BVP and lenticulation. High minus lenses frequently require very large BOZDs to avoid flare (iv) Peripheral curves The first peripheral curves should be at least 0.70mm flatter than the BOZR and rather more for lenses at the flatter end of the scale A flat peripheral curve gives less corneal irritation but greater lid sensation (v) Back vertex power (BVP) and over-refraction (OR) Trial lenses should be as near as possible to anticipated BVP If a lens is fitted steeper than ‘k’ a positive lens is created requiring more negative power in the overIf a lens is fitted flatter than ‘K’ a negative near lens created requiring more positive power in the over refraction Different BVPs are likely for the same degree of with and against the rule astigmatism The final BVP should correlate with the spectacle Rx after taking into account the vertex distance Worked examples in class SOFT LENS DESIGN AND FITTING The two main fitting philosophies into which soft lenses may be divided are therefore corneal and semisclera, although there is now considerable overlap, especially with single diameter lenses between these two approaches. Emphasis will be placed on semi-sclera lenses are significantly larger with better stability of both vision and fitting in order to provide good physiological response, they are now manufactured from medium to high water content materials with high DK values Indications Most straight forward cases Large cornea Large palpebral apertures Sensitive lid margin Hyperopes and high powers, if high water content Moderate degrees of astigmatism (0.75-1.25D) Contradictions Very small cornea 40 Small palpebral apertures and tight lids if handling is difficult Cornea prone to oedema if low water content Where cosmetic appearance is not important Fitting radius Radius selection is based on keratometry Most radii are fitted between 8.30 and 9.20mm High water content lenses are fitted between 0.30 and 1.00mm flatter than ‘K’ Low water content lenses are fitted flatter between 0.70 and 1.30mm flatter than ‘K’ Fitting steps are usually 0.30mm or 0.40mm Most semi-sclera lenses are bicurve construction, with a relatively flat but narrow peripheral curve. Total diameter Lenses are fitted significantly larger than HVID, to give deliberate apical touch with further support beyond the limbus where they overlap onto the sclera. The TD isselected to be 2.00 – 3.00mm larger than the HVID The majority of semi sclera lenses are fitted with total diameters of14.20-14.80mm, the possible range is from 13.50-16.00mm Power Mainly because of flexure effects, the power of a correctly fitting lens often shows approximately 0.250.50D less minus than the spectacle Rx, after allowing for any vertex distance considerations. With more rigid low water content lenses, this difference can be as great as 0.75D Fitting appearance and lens movement It is essential that a correctly fitting lens should be sufficiently large to span the limbus and not interfere with the blood vessels in this region. Soft lens fittings are assessed in relation to lens movement with Blinking Upward and lateral gaze The push up test This simple test is used to assess the speed of recovery when a soft lens is displaced vertically upwards by the practitioner with the eye in the primary position. A rapid recovery movement suggests a satisfactory fitting, whereas a slow recovery may be indicative of tightness. Rule of thumb A change in the radius of 0.30mm= a change of diameter of 0.50mm Examples: 8.10 :13.50 = 8.40:14.00 8.70: 14.50 = 9.00: 15.00 To improve a loose fitting Select a steeper radius Select a larger diameter Use a more rigid or lower water content material Use a different lens thickness Worked examples in class To improve a tight fitting Select a flatter radius Select a smaller total diameter Use a less rigid or higher water content material Use a different lens thickness Worked examples in class 41 CARE SYSTEMS Components of solutions Buffers Buffers (e.g., sodium phosphate, borate or tromethamine) are included where there is need to keep the pH within narrow limits necessary for contact lens wear(pH 6-8). The antimicrobial buffer system (ABS) patented by CIBA vision combines three borate buffers (boric acid, sodium borate andsodium perborate) in bottled saline. These constituents yield 0.006% hydrogen peroxide which acts as an antimicrobial agent. Preservatives Preservatives restrict the growth of microorganisms and maintain the sterility of the solution remaining in the bottle and in the CL case. Typical examples are given below Benzalkonium chloride (BAK) Frequently used with PMMA lenses. It destabilizes the tear film in concs over 0.004%, so wetting solutions or rewetting drops do not exceed this conc. The majority of the soaking and cleaning solutions can use 0.004-0.01% because they do not come in contact with the eye. Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) Usually included with other preservative systems in conc of 0.006% for hard lens solutions. If it is used alone, the kill time is slow and lenses must be stored for a minimumof 10hrs.soft lens solutions employ a reduced conc of 0.002-0.005% Thiomersal A mercurial derivative used in concs of 0.001-0.002% with both hard and soft lens solutions, more often found with the latter Thiomersal is effective against fungi, but toxic reactions are fairly common. It is slow acting as a preservative andsois usually incorporated with chlorhexidine or EDTA (Ethylenediamine Tetra acetic acid) Dymed Dymed is the proprietary name for polyhexanide (polyaminopropyl biguanide). It is one of the new generation of high molecular weight preservatives used in multifunction soft lens solutions that come under theumbrella title of polyquats. Dymed is found in concs of 0.00005-0.0001%. all polyquats bind to negatively charged phospholipids found in the bacterial plasma membrane. Their action results in cellular lysis rather than disrupting bacterial cell walls like antimicrobials (e.g., ReNu, ReNu Multiplus, complete). Polyquad Polyquad (pollyquaternium) is a new generation polyquat used as a high molecular weight preservative. The molecular weight is 14 times that of chlorhhexidine, nearly 4 times that of Dymed and comes in a conc of 0.001% (e.g., Opti-free, Opti-1) Phenylmercuric nitrate and chlorbutol Phenylmercuric nitrate is found in some multipurpose hard lens solutions in a conc of 0.004%. Chlorbutol binds to CAB and now uncommon due to its volatile nature. Used in concs of 0.4% (e.g., Liquifilm tears) Quaternary ammonia Used in soft lens soaking solutions in concs of 0.013-0.03% Sorbic acid Used in surfactant cleaners with a concof 0.1% (e.g. Pliagel) Tonicity (invariably sodium chloride) To adjust the salt conc and ensure compatibility with the tears 42 Viscosity agents (e.g Hydroxy Ethyl cellulose) To improve the wetting time and comfort of the solution Wetting agents (eg. Polyvinyl alcohol, polysorbate 80) To help the solution spread across the lens surface. Also found in soft lens disinfection solutions (eg. Polyvinyl pyrrolidone) Chelating agents [eg. Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA)] known as sodium edentate. Found in concs 0.01-0.2%. Use to enhance the action of preservatives, exceptions are mercurial derivatives. Surfactants (e.g. Poloxamine. Miranol) The most common surfactants used in multipurpose soft lens solutions for their cleaning action are poloxamine and tyloxapol. Surfactants and solutions for hard gas permeable lenses. These are supplemented in recent products with non-ionic surfactants e.g. Lubricare (Quattro) and protein removal agents, e.g. Hydranate (ReNu MultiPlus) SOLUTIONS FOR HARD GAS PERMEABLE LENSES The surface of a hard gas permeable lens is prone to deposits and interaction with some formulations compared to more inert PMMA. Wetting solutions. Wetting solutions are used on insertion to act as a cushion between the lens and the cornea. They also enhance the spread of tears across the lens surface, although the effect only lasts for a maximum of 15 minutes and sometimes for as little as 5 seconds. Formulation: tonicity, viscosity agent, wetting agent, preservatives, chelating agent. Soaking solutions: Soaking solutions keep lenses hydrated during overnight storage in a sterile, bacteriocidal environment. They facilitate good surface wetting and assist the removal of deposits. Hydration is important to maintain correct BOZR both for modern hard lens materials and for PMMA over about -10.00D. Formulation: tonicity agent, wetting agent, detergent, preservatives, chelating agent. Chelating agent Cleaning solutions remove surface debris including lipids and mucus (e.g. LC65) and enhance the disinfecting action of the soaking solution. With the advent of fluorosilicon acrylates, greasing of the lens surface has become a more frequent problem. Manufacturers have therefore developed 43