Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR
TOOL IN VALIDATING THE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT AND PLAN
NOTE TO THE VALIDATOR/REVIEWER: Please check for the completeness and appropriateness of each
component of the LDNA Plan based on the indicator provided.
NAME OF
SCHOOL
SCHOOL
ADDRESS
NAME OF
SCHOOL HEAD
SCHOOL
CATEGORY
NO. OF
TEACHERS
SUBSYSTEM
ASSESSED
Components
BACKGROUND AND
RATIONALE
- Clearly presents the
context within which
the LDNA is
conducted, purpose
of the conduct, and
its importance
OBJECTIVES
-Clearly states what
the LDNA aims to
attain
TARGET UNIT
AND/OR JOB GROUP
-Identifies who are
involved in the
LDNA( Account all
teachers)
ASSESSMENT FOCUS
- Identifies the core
emphasis pertinent
to performance
and/or competency
areas, including KSAs
of teachers
EVIDENT
NOT
EVIDENT
FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS
METHODOLOGIES
AND TOOLS
Identifies an
appropriate
combination of
methodologies to
obtain needed data,
the sampling
method, and tools
to be developed
DATA
REQUIREMENTS
AND DATA
SOURCES.
-Describes the nature
of relevant data to
be gathered and
where these can be
obtained
IMPLEMENTATION
DETAILS
-Specifies activities,
persons responsible,
timelines, resources,
and budget needed
DATE OF VALIDATION: _______________
REVIEWED/ VALIDATED BY:
LYDIA B. BORINGOT
PSDS
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR
TOOL IN VALIDATING THE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT REPORT AND PLAN
NOTE TO THE VALIDATOR/REVIEWER: Please check for the completeness and appropriateness of each
part of the LDNA Plan based on the indicator provided.
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL ADDRESS
NAME OF SCHOOL
HEAD
SCHOOL
CATEGORY
NO . OF
TEACHERS
SUBSYSTEM
ASSESSED
COMPONENTS
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
-Captures the
objectives, key
findings, conclusions,
and recommendations
of the LDNA
BACKGROUND AND
RATIONALE
-Discusses the
context within which
LDNA is conducted,
and its importance
METHODOLOGY
Discusses the
processes and tools
employed in gathering
data on the learning
needs, including the
following:
1. Profile of teachers
2. Assessment
results. (Presents
findings and data
in a coherent
manner)
EVIDENT
NOT EVIDENT
FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCLUSION
-Highlights key
findings and their
implications and
provides insights or
information that need
to be considered in
L&D planning and
designing
DATE OF VALIDATION: _______________
REVIEWED/ VALIDATED BY:
LYDIA B. BORINGOT
PSDS
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR
TOOL IN VALIDATING THE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PLANNING
NOTE TO THE VALIDATOR/REVIEWER: Please check for the completeness and appropriateness of each
part of the LD PROGRAM PLANNING based on the indicator provided.
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL ADDRESS
NAME OF SCHOOL
HEAD
SCHOOL
CATEGORY
NO. OF TEACHERS
SUBSYSTEM
ASSESSED
COMPONENTS
Competency/
Domain
-competency-based
using available
competency
standards (i.e.,
Philippine
Professional
Standards for
Teachers (PPST) and
competency-based
job
Learning
Objective/KSA
-based on the results
of a systematic
learning needs
assessment
-unique and common
learning needs and
are identified and
included
Teachers needing
development
-covers all teaching
personnel regardless
of age, gender, civil
status, ability,
interest, difficulty,
disability, ethnicity,
religion, and work
assignment
EVIDENT
NOT EVIDENT
FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS
Modality
Identify the modality
to be employed
whether:
1. Formal
learning
2. Job
Embedded
Learning
3. LAC
4. Relationship
Discussion
Based
Learning
Schedule
Indicate the inclusive
period of
implementation
Budget/Support
Needed
Determine the
Budget and Support
Needed
Funding Source
Data on the funding
source
DATE OF VALIDATION: _______________
REVIEWED/ VALIDATED BY:
LYDIA B. BORINGOT
PSDS
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR
TOOL IN VALIDATING THE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PLANNING
NOTE TO THE VALIDATOR/REVIEWER: Please check for the completeness and appropriateness of each
part of the LD PROGRAM DESIGNING based on the indicator provided.
NAME OF SCHOOL
SCHOOL ADDRESS
NAME OF SCHOOL
HEAD
SCHOOL CATEGORY
NO. OF TEACHERS
SUBSYSTEM
ASSESSED
COMPONENTS
Intervention learning
objectives
-are relevant and
responsive to the
competencies (Please
see alignment in the
LDNA and PLAN )
- stated in behavioral
terms, and aligned with
the behavioral indicators
of the competencies for
development
-All learning objectives
(terminal, enabling, and
session) are stated from
the learners’ point of
view.
-Session objectives are
small enough to be
covered in a learning
unit, relevant, sufficient
to contribute towards
achieving the enabling
and terminal objectives
EVIDENT
NOT
EVIDENT
FINDINGS
RECOMMENDATIONS
- Content areas support
achievement of learning
objectives.
Content areas are
prioritized and organized
in a logical sequence,
using most appropriate
structure.
All needed learning
resource materials,
supplies, and equipment
to support delivery of
learning sessions are
identified and
appropriate for the
requirements of diverse
learners
Contains the following
Parts
1. Background and
Rationale
Objective/s /
Outcome/s
2. Program /
Intervention
Description
3. Professional
Development
Priorities
4. Professional
Standards
Covered (PPST,
PPSSH or PPSS
domain/s,
strand/s,
learning domains
or indicator/s)
5. Target
Participant
Profile (Career
Stage, Grade
Level, Learning
Area,
Assignments or
Designations in
the School
6. Number of Hours
(Face-to-Face
Instruction
and/or
Online/Blended
Learning, and
7. Classroom
Application (if
applicable)
8. Detailed
Program or
Course Matrix
9. List of Resource
Persons/Learning
Facilitators
Supported by
CVs
10. Modules and
Learning
Resources to be
Used
11. Budgetary
Requirements
12. Delivery
Platform (Online,
Face-to-Face and
Blended
Delivery)
13. Indicative Date
of
Implementation
14. Professional
Regulation
Commission
(PRC) Program
Accreditation
No. if Applicable
15. Assessment Plan
( or Expected
Outputs)
16. Support Needed
DATE OF VALIDATION: _______________
REVIEWED/ VALIDATED BY:
LYDIA B. BORINGOT
PSDS