BUILDING AND MANAGING PROJECT TEAM SEIFU MAMO(PHD) 1.1 Selecting the Project Manager The selection process for project managers is not easy. Five basic questions must be considered: ● What are the internal and external sources? ● How do we select? ● How do we provide career development in project management? ● How can we develop project management skills? ● How do we evaluate project management performance? Project managers are sometimes qualified and experienced project management specialists who are employed on a permanent basis by an organization. Sometimes they are external consultants who are contracted to manage the project for its duration only. For internal projects, they are mostly selected from within the existing workforce. In all cases they are charged with organizing and managing a project team that will work together in order to meet the project objectives. the project manager is usually selected from the ranks of functional managers or staff. A good functional manager with the skills required for project management is by far the best option because of the understanding of the industry and the organization that is brought to the post. internally appointed project manager is likely to know the key players and have established some sort of relationship with them. The organization may be reluctant to release a good functional manager because of difficulty in finding a replacement, particularly where the functional role is being carried out to a very high standard. One thing it cannot and should not attempt to do is have one manager act as both project manager for a major project and continue in a functional management role. Apart from the fact that both roles are likely to be demanding, they may also be conflicting and hence could not be fulfilled effectively at the same time. external consultant. There are an increasing number of private practices that are offering professional project management commissions as part of their portfolio of professional services. The obvious disadvantage is the project manager is not used to the organization and there will therefore be a learning curve involved. It demands some skills that are very different to those of the normal functional manager. From a project point of view, this makes specialist project managers advantageous. The Project Manager is the person assigned by the performing organization to lead the team that is responsible for achieving the project objectives. The role of a project manager is distinct from a functional manager or operations manager. Typically, the functional manager is focused on providing management oversight for a functional or a business unit, and operations managers are responsible for ensuring that business operations are efficient. Depending on the organizational structure, a project manager may report to a functional manager. In other cases, a project manager may be one of several project managers who report to a program or portfolio manager. The project manager also works closely and in collaboration with other roles, such as a business analyst, quality assurance manager, and subject matter experts. Responsibilities and Competencies of the Project Manager In general, project managers have the responsibility to satisfy the following needs: task needs, team needs, and individual needs. As project management is a critical strategic discipline, the project manager becomes the link between the strategy and the team. Projects are essential to the growth and survival of organizations. Projects create value in the form of improved business processes, are indispensable in the development of new products and services, and make it easier for companies to respond to changes in the environment, competition, and the marketplace. The project manager’s role therefore becomes increasingly strategic. However, understanding and applying the knowledge, tools, and techniques that are recognized as good practice are not sufficient for effective project management. The Project Managers In addition to any area-specific skills and general management proficiencies required for the project, effective project management requires that the project manager possess the following competencies: Knowledge—Refers to what the project manager knows about project management. Performance—Refers to what the project manager is able to do or accomplish while applying his or her project management knowledge. Personal—Refers to how the project manager behaves when performing the project or related activity. Personal effectiveness encompasses attitudes, core personality characteristics, and leadership, which provides the ability to guide the project team while achieving project objectives and balancing the project constraints. INTERPERSONAL SKILLS OF A PROJECT MANAGER Project managers accomplish work through the project team and other stakeholders. Effective project managers require a balance of ethical, interpersonal, and conceptual skills that help them analyze situations and interact appropriately. important interpersonal skills, such as: • Leadership, • Team building, • Motivation, • Communication, • Influencing, • Decision making, • Political and cultural awareness, • Negotiation, • Trust building, • Conflict management, and • Coaching 1.2 The Concept of the Project Manager A project manager is similar to a chief executive or managing director. Indeed, it has become relatively common for large organizations to use project management assignments as a means of developing future general managers. The project manager owns the project and has sole responsibility for its outcome. In addition, where small to medium-sized projects are concerned, the project manager is often responsible for managing several projects concurrently. The project manager is usually responsible to a project sponsor. In the case of very large projects, or those that will have a significant influence on the future of the organization, the sponsor will normally be a board member. There are skills and attributes that make some people more suitable for the role of project manager than others,. For example, a project manager who is good at managing new-product development projects within a pharmaceutical company is likely to have a degree of specialist knowledge and skills that is different from that required to successfully manage construction projects. 1.2 The Concept of the Project Manager In traditional organizations, influence and authority tend to flow vertically down from the top to the bottom of the organization. However, any complex project will usually require the support of many levels of management within organizations and of many departments/functions across the organization. For example, a project for developing and introducing a new management reporting and control system for a complete organization may be sponsored by the controller’s department but will require extensive co-operation and assistance from all the other functional areas if it is to succeed. It would take too long if all communications, instructions, resolution of problems and so on had to follow the functional hierarchy and travel from the project manager via the controller to other functional heads at the same level, from them down their hierarchical chain to the relevant subordinates, and back again through the same route to the project manager. Hence projects tend to be run outside the traditional hierarchy of the organization. 1.2 The Concept of the Project Manager The project manager’s role is by its nature a temporary one, superimposed on the organization. It does not have the power associated with traditional hierarchical positions. Project managers must work across functional and organizational lines and frequently have few direct subordinates. Therefore, perhaps the biggest single issue faced by project managers arises because they have the authority to make decisions about project priorities, schedules, budgets, objectives and policies, but often do not have the official authority to give direct orders to the people who must carry out the work as a result of these decisions. Figure 1.1 Sources of influence for the project manager Ultimately, if the project manager cannot secure the necessary co-operation within the organization, the assistance of the project sponsor(s) will be sought. Projects sometimes require resources from a range of external organizations that may be locally or globally based. Hence, the project manager may be responsible for managing across functional, departmental, organizational and geographical boundaries – a good training ground indeed for future senior managers. 1.3 The Central Position of the Project Manager The project manager’s post lies at the center of the principles of project management Given the project manager’s ultimate responsibility for the project’s outcome, a key ability is to be able to focus on issues in detail while at the same time keeping a clear view of the project as a whole. This ability to focus within the overview ensures that people and resources are obtained and utilized in an integrated way – including reorganizing to overcome problems and difficulties that will inevitably arise from time to time – in order to accomplish the project’s goals and objectives. To do this, the project manager occupies a central position relating to communications between the various people and organizations involved, much like a spider at the center of a web. 1.3 The Central Position of the Project Manager This central position results in the project manager being responsible for receiving and issuing more information than anyone else on the project. These communications are intended to ensure that all those involved, individuals and organizations alike, understand what is required of them at all stages of the project as it unfolds. the project manager is the primary decision-maker on the project and the main link with the organization itself on project matters. Where there is no direct authority, the project manager also has responsibility for influencing decisions relating to the well-being of the project. The project manager needs to have both the intellect to devise the project strategy and the diligence to ensure that actions are taken, both to the required standards and on time. The project manager directs the project and its people towards these ends. This requires the energy and ability to motivate staff to achieve the project goals 1.4 The Role of Project Manager The primary requirements of the project manager’s role can be summarized as: planning the project activities, schedules and budgets; organizing and selecting the project team; interfacing with the client, the organization and all other interested parties; negotiating with suppliers and clients; managing the project resources; monitoring and controlling the project status; identifying issues and problem areas; finding solutions to problems; · resolving conflicts 1.4 The Role of Project Manager . These roles are intrinsically linked and cannot be regarded in isolation. For example, planning the project activities depends on the characteristics of the project team. The time that has to be allowed for a given activity depends on the resources available when staffing the project team. In meeting the above requirements, the project manager will use many different skills, ranging from entrepreneurship to large-company politics, from diplomacy to single-minded determination, from technical skills to leadership skills. In essence, the role calls for skilled and competent generalists who, in the case of large complex projects, must also be very high achievers with strong communications and interpersonal skills. The requirements above have to be carried out within the overall success or failure criteria established for the project as a whole. These include delivering the project: within the agreed time limit; within the agreed cost limit; to at least the minimum quality standards laid down; to the satisfaction of the client; in compliance with the strategic plan of the organization; · within the agreed scope. 1.5 Personal, Managerial and Leadership Skills A project manager needs to apply the full range of traditional management skills in addition to having a detailed technical knowledge of the project itself. Generally, in terms of ‘soft’ management skills and attributes, the project manager should Be flexible and adaptable; Be able to concentrate on more than one thing at a time; demonstrate initiative; Be persuasive; be a good communicator; Be able to keep multiple objectives in sight and be able to balance them; be well organized; Be prepared to generalize rather than (always) specialize; Be a good planner and implementer; Be able to identify problems, find solutions, and make sure that they work; Be a good time manager; Be good at negotiating and influencing (rather than arguing or giving orders); Be diplomatic. Technical and Business Skills The project manager also has to possess a range of technical and business skills. Technical skills are necessary in order to understand the detailed components of the project. For example, a project manager who is in charge of a large and complex project to install a new production line has to have an extensive knowledge of the mechanics of the production system. It is not possible fully to appreciate the inputs of the various designers, suppliers and contractors without this knowledge. In addition, in most cases the project manager also needs to have a detailed business and financial knowledge. Increasingly, project managers are responsible for investment appraisal and financial analysis of projects. Technical and Business Skills Typical ‘harder’ characteristics include understanding how to set up a team and run it; The ability to develop complex time and cost plans and achieve them; Understanding of contracts, procurement, purchasing and personnel; Active interest in training and development; Understanding of the technology that is central to project success; Ability to translate business strategy into project objectives. 1.6 Some Essential Project Manager Requirements An effective project manager needs to be able to execute a number of primary functions. These primary functions are applicable to all areas of management, including project management. The project manager must have a reasonable command of: ♦ Project Planning ♦ Authorizing ♦ Team Organizing ♦ Controlling ♦ Directing ♦ Team Building ♦ Leadership ♦ Life-Cycle Leadership Responsibilities of the Project Manager The project manager’s responsibility is to ensure the customer is satisfied that the work scope is completed in a quality manner, within budget, and on time. Provides leadership in planning, organizing, and controlling the work effort Coordinates the activities of various team members Involves the project team to gain their commitment Planning Clearly defines the project objective and reaches agreement with the customer Communicates this objective to the project team 5 Organizing Secures the appropriate resources Decides which tasks should be done in-house and which by subcontractors or consultants Assigns responsibility and delegates authority Creates an environment in which individuals are highly motivated Controlling Tracks actual progress and compares it with planned progress Takes immediate action if progress or costs change 7 Skills of the Project Manager The project manager is a key ingredient in the success of a project. Strong leadership ability Ability to develop people Excellent communication skills Good interpersonal skills Ability to handle stress Problem-solving skills Time management skills 9 Leadership Ability Leadership is getting things done through others. Inspire the people assigned to the project Create vision of the result and benefits of the project Participative and consultative leadership style Establishes the parameters and guidelines for what needs to be done Is optimistic and positive Is highly motivated and sets a positive example Has self-confidence and inspires confidence Leads by making things happen 10 Leadership Ability (Cont.) Involves and empowers the project team Empowers individuals to make decisions within their assigned areas Understands what motivates team members and creates a supportive environment Fosters motivation through recognition Sets the tone of trust, high expectations, and enjoyment Has high expectations of themselves and of each person on the project team 11 Ability to Develop People Committed to the training and development of people Uses the project to add value to each person’s experience base Believes that all individuals are valuable to the organization Stresses the value of self-improvement 13 Ability to Develop People (Cont.) Provides opportunities for learning and development by encouraging individuals to assume the initiative, take risks, and make decisions Provides assignments that require individuals to extend their knowledge Identifies situations in which less experienced people can learn from more experienced people Has people attend formal training sessions May provide coaching 14 Communication Skills Effective and frequent communication is crucial. Communicate regularly with the project team, subcontractors, customer, and own upper management A high level of communication is especially important early in the project Good oral and written communication skills Spend more time listening than talking 15 Communication Skills (Cont.) Establish ongoing communication with the customer Communication should be timely, honest, and unambiguous Effective communication establishes credibility and builds trust Provide timely feedback to the team and customer Create an atmosphere that fosters timely and open communication 16 Interpersonal Skills Good interpersonal skills are essential Develop a relationship with each person on the project team Try to learn about the personal interests of each individual without being intrusive Should use open-ended questions and do a lot of listening Empathize with individuals when special circumstances arise 17 Interpersonal Skills (Cont.) Maintain relationships throughout the duration of the project Use good interpersonal skills to try to influence the thinking and actions of others Use good interpersonal skills to deal with disagreement or divisiveness 18 Ability to Handle Stress Cannot panic; remain unruffled Able to cope with constantly changing conditions Act as a buffer between the project team and the customer or upper management Have a good sense of humor Stress is likely to be high when a project is in jeopardy of not meeting its objective 19 Problem-Solving Skills Early identification of a problem or potential problem is important Encourage project team members to identify problems early and solve them on their own 20 Time Management Skills Have self-discipline Be able to prioritize Show a willingness to delegate 21 Developing the Skills Needed to Be a Project Manager Gain experience — work on as many projects as you can; each project presents a learning opportunity Seek out feedback from others Conduct a self-evaluation and learn from your mistakes Interview project managers who have skills that you want to develop Participate in training programs 22 Developing the Skills Needed to Be a Project Manager (Cont.) Join organizations, such as the Project Management Institute Read and subscribe to journals Volunteer and contribute to the community or a specific cause to develop leadership skills Learning and development are lifetime activities— there’s no finish line 23 Delegation Involves empowering the team to achieve the objective and empowering each team member to accomplish the expected results Allow individuals to successfully carry out assigned tasks Give team members the responsibility to accomplish job objectives and the authority to make decisions and take actions Give team members accountability for accomplishing results 24 Delegation (Cont.) Requires effective communication skills Provide a clear understanding of what is expected in terms of specific results, but do not tell the individuals how to do the task Select the team members who are best qualified to perform each task and then empowering them to do it Have confidence in each member of the team 25 Delegation (Cont.) Common barriers to effective delegation Project manager has a personal interest in the task Project manager thinks she can do it better or faster herself Project manager lacks confidence in the capability of others Project manager is afraid he will lose control of the work and not know what is going on Team members fear criticism for mistakes or lack self-confidence 26 2.1.What Is a Group? A collection of two or more interacting individuals with a stable pattern of relationships between them who share common goals and who perceive themselves as being a group. 2.1. What Is a Group? First, groups are composed of two or more people in social interaction. In other words, the members of a group must have some influence on each other. Second, groups must possess a stable structure. Although groups can change, and often do, there must be some stable relationships that keep group members together and functioning as a unit. A third characteristic of groups is that members share common interests or goals. For example, members of a company's safety committee all share a common goal in keeping the workplace free of danger. Fourth, and finally, to be a group, the individuals involved must perceive themselves as a group. Groups are composed of people who recognize each other as a member of their group and they can distinguish these individuals from nonmembers. 2.2. TYPES OF GROUPS A-FORMAL GROUPS are Groups created by the organization and that are intentionally designed to direct members toward some important organizational goal are known as formal groups. One type of formal group is referred to as a command group—a group determined by the connections between individuals who are a formal part of the organization (i.e., those who can legitimately give orders to others). Command groups are determined by the organization's rules regarding who reports to whom, and they usually consist of a supervisor and his or her subordinates. A formal organizational group also may be formed around some specific task. Such a group is referred to as a task group. Unlike command groups, task groups may be composed of individuals with some special interest or expertise in a specific area regardless of their positions in the organizational hierarchy. Whether they are permanent committees, known as standing committees, or temporary ones formed for special purposes (such as a committee formed to recommend solutions to a parking problem), known as ad hoc committees or task forces, task groups are commonly found in organizations. B- INFORMAL GROUPS. Informal groups develop naturally among an organization's personnel without any direction from the management . One key factor in the formation of informal groups is a common interest shared by its members. For example, a group of employees who band together to seek union representation, or who March together to protest their company's pollution of the environment, may be called an. INTEREST GROUP The common goal sought by members of an interest group may unite workers at many different organizational levels. The key factor is that membership in an interest group is voluntary Groups may develop out of a common interest in participating in sports, or going to the movies, or just getting together to talk. These kinds of informal groups are known as. FRIENDSHIP GROUPS Friendship groups extend beyond the workplace because they provide opportunities for satisfying the social needs of workers that are so important to their well being. Friendships can bind people together, helping them cooperate with each other, and may have beneficial effects on organizational functioning. 2.3. WHAT IS A TEAM? A team can be defined as a group whose members have complementary skills and are committed to a common purpose or set of performance goals for which they hold themselves mutually accountable. A team is a group of people coming together to collaborate. This collaboration is to reach a shared goal or task for which they hold themselves mutually accountable. A team is a group of people with a high degree of interdependence geared towards the achievement of a common goal or completion of a task rather than just a group for administrative convenience. Team members are deeply committed to each other's personal growth and success. A team outperforms a group and outperforms all reasonable expectations given to its individual members. 2.3. WHAT IS A TEAM? A team can be defined as a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and a common approach that they hold themselves mutually accountable. The small number normally ranges from 2 to 25 members, with somewhere between 5 and 9 as normally the most manageable and optimal. Complementary skills provide synergy when the team is diverse and various ideas and multiple skills are combined. Common purpose is the driving force of teams. The team must develop its own purpose that must be meaningful and have ownership by all individuals. A team needs to periodically revisit its purpose in order to make it more relevant as the team develops (often called an agenda). 2.3. WHAT IS A TEAM? Performance goals are the acting, moving, and energizing force of the team. Specific performance goals are established, tracked, met, and evaluated in an ongoing process. Common approaches are the means in which members agree on how they will work together. Teams should develop their own charter or set of rules that outline the expected behaviors of its members. Members often assume roles, such as the Questioner or Devil's Advocate, Historian, Time Keeper, and Facilitator, to keep the team processes moving and on course. Mutuall accountability is the aspect of teamwork that is normally the last to develop. It is the owning and sharing of the team's outcomes, both successes and failures. Shared Mental Models, Team members not only cooperate in all aspects of their tasks and goals, they share in what are traditionally thought of as management functions, such as planning, organizing, setting performance goals, assessing the team's performance, developing their own strategies to manage change, and securing their own resources. 2.3.1. THE CONCEPT OF WHAT A PROJECT TEAM IS The project team includes the project manager and the group of individuals who act together in performing the work of the project to achieve its objectives. The project team includes the project manager, project management staff, and other team members who carry out the work but who are not necessarily involved with management of the project. This team is comprised of individuals from different groups with specific subject matter knowledge or with a specific skill set to carry out the work of the project. The structure and characteristics of a project team can vary widely, but one constant is the project manager’s role as the leader of the team, regardless of what authority the project manager may have over its members. Project teams include roles such as: Project management staff. The members of the team who perform project management activities such as scheduling, budgeting, reporting and control, communications, risk management and administrative support. This role may be performed or supported by a project management office (PMO). Project staff. The members of the team who carry out the work of creating the project deliverables. Project teams include roles such as: Supporting experts. Supporting experts perform activities required to develop or execute the project management plan. These can include such roles as contracting, financial management, logistics, legal, safety, engineering, test, or quality control. Depending on the size of the project and level of support required, supporting experts may be assigned to work full time or may just participate on the team when their particular skills are required. User or Customer Representatives. Members of the organization who will accept the deliverables or products of the project may be assigned to act as representatives or liaisons to ensure proper coordination, advise on requirements, or validate the acceptability of the project’s results. Project teams include roles such as: Sellers. Sellers, also called vendors, suppliers, or contractors, are external companies that enter into a contractual agreement to provide components or services necessary for the project. The project team is often assigned the responsibility to oversee the performance and acceptance of sellers’ deliverables or services. If the sellers bear a large share of the risk for delivering the project’s results, they may play a significant role on the project team. Business partner members. Members of business partners’ organizations may be assigned as members of the project team to ensure proper coordination. Business partners. Business partners are also external companies, but they have a special relationship with the enterprise, sometimes attained through a certification process. Business partners provide specialized expertise or fill a specified role such as installation, customization, training, or support. INDIVIDUAL VS TEAM WORK WHEN TO WORK ALONE? WHEN TO BUILD TEAMS? 1. For simple tasks. 1. For highly complex tasks or problems 2.When co-operation is sufficient 2. When consensus decisions are essential. 3.When minimum discretion are needed. 3. When there is a high level of choice and uncertainty 4.When fast decisions are needed. 4. When high commitment is needed. 5.When few competencies are required 5. When a broad range of Competencies are required. 6.When members interest are inherently 6. Where member objectives can be conflicting galvanized 7.Where the organization credits individuals 7. Where the organization rewards for operational output. team results for strategy and vision building 8.When innovative responses are sought 8. When balanced views are sought 2.4.THE KEY CHARACTERISTIS OF A TEAM FIRST, teams are organized around work processes rather than functions. SECOND, teams "own" the product, service, or processes on which they work. By this, we mean that people feel part of something meaningful, and that they understand how their work fits into the big picture THIRD, members of teams are trained in several different areas and have a variety of different skills. FOURTH, teams govern themselves. And, as a result, team leaders may be thought of as coaches who help members of the team, rather than bosses who use more authoritarian means of leadership. FIFTH, in teams, support staff and responsibilities are built-in. For example, at some companies, there are no longer any quality inspectors. Instead, all team members are all trained in matters of inspection and quality control. SIXTH, finally, teams are involved in company-wide decisions. This is in contrast to the traditional practice of using managers to make all organizational decisions. 2.5. THE ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE TEAMS Some of the elements needed for a team to be effective are formal leadership, roles, norms, group status, group size, composition of the group and the degree of group cohesiveness. FORMAL LEADERSHIP Almost every working group has a formal leader. A formal leader of a team is usually appointed or elected. Informal leaders, on the other hand tend to emerge gradually as a group members interact. A formal leader of formal group is typically identified by titles such as unit or department manager, supervisor, fore man, project leader or committee chair. This leader can play an important part in the group’s/ team’s success. Motivate, communicate ,coach and train NORMS OF A TEAM It refers to the expectations about how each team members will behave. acceptable standards of behavior that are shared by the members. Norms tell members what they ought and ought not to do under certain circumstances. When agreed to and accepted by the groups/teams, norm act as a means of influencing the behavior of group members with a minimum of external controls. The most common classes of norms that appear in most work groups/teams are: Performance norms. Appearance norms. These include things such as appropriate dress, loyalty to the workgroup/team or organization and so forth. Social arrangement norms. Allocation of resource norms.. ROLE All work group/team are defined by role that members in the group/team perform. Role is a set of expected behavior pattern attributed to someone occupying a given position in a social unit. certain attitudes and actual behaviors consistent with a roles create the role identity. Based on an interpretation of how we believe we are supposed to behave, we engage in certain types of behavior one’s view of how one is supposed to act in a given situation is a role perception. Role expectations are defined as how others believe you should act in a given situation. How you behave is determined to a large extent by the role defined in the context in which you are acting. When an individual is confronted by divergent role expectations, the result is role conflict. It exists when an individual finds that compliance with one requirement may make more difficult the compliance with another. At the extreme, it would include situation in which two or more role expectations are mutually contradictory. STATUS Every work group/ team has a status system. Status develops in a team/group because a particular individual or group posses or contribute value to the organization that are highly regarded by members. Hence status is a socially defined position or rank given to a member or group by other. Status is a significant motivator and has major behavioral consequences when individuals perceive a disparity between what they believe their status to be and what others perceive it to be. SIZE The size of a team or group affects the overall behavior. One of the most important findings related to the size of a group is social loafing. Social loafing is the tendency for individual to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. The research in-group size leads to two additional conclusions. Groups with an odd number tend to be preferable to those with an even number and Groups made of five or seven members do a pretty good job of exercising the best elements of both small and large group. Having an odd number of members eliminates the possibility of ties when vote are taken. COMPOSITION Most team activities require a variety of skills and knowledge. Heterogeneous groups – those composed of dissimilar individuals – would be more likely to have diverse abilities and information and should be more effective. Essentially, diversity promotes conflict; which stimulate creativity and leads in turn to improved decision making. COHESIVENESS Refers to the degree to which members are attracted to each other and are motivated to stay in the group. The solidarity of a team is an important indicator of how much influence the group has over its individual members. Team cohesiveness is critical in helping the individual feel – good about his or her contribution to the effort. High cohesive teams or groups often have less tension and hostility and fewer misunderstandings than less cohesive group do. 2.6.TYPES OF TEAMS There are three major dimensions. The first has to do with their major purpose or mission. In this regard, some teams—known as work teams—are concerned primarily with the work done by the organization, such as developing and manufacturing new products, providing services for customers, and so on. Their principal focus is on using the organization's resources to effectively create its results (goods or services). A second dimension has to do with time. Specifically, some teams are only temporary, and are established for a specific project with a finite life. However, other teams are permanent, and stay intact as long as the organization is operating. For example, teams focusing on providing effective customer service tend to be permanent parts of many organizations. The third dimension reflects the team's connection to the organization's overall authority structure—that is, the connection between various formal job responsibilities. In some organizations, teams may cross over various functional units and are said to be overlaid/cross functional team. For example, a quality improvement team. IMPORTANT ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS The Top Management Team. An organization’s top management team is the team of managers who report to the chief executive officer (CEO). Top management teams are chosen by the CEO and board of directors of the organization. This team impacts the entire organization since it decides the overall goals of the organization. Self-Managed Work Teams. team members do have the autonomy to lead and manage themselves and determine how the team will perform its tasks. In a self managed work team, separate tasks normally performed by individual employees and managed by a supervisor fall under the responsibility of a group of employees empowered to ensure they get done and get done well. Research and Development Teams. Organizations often use research and development (R&D) teams to develop new products, especially in high-tech industries such as electronics, pharmaceuticals, and computers. Some R&D teams are crossfunctional. Virtual Teams. Virtual teams are teams in which a significant amount of communication and interaction among team members occurs electronically, using computer hardware and software. Organizations use virtual teams to help people in different places and/or time zones work together. 2.7. FACTORS SEPARATING TEAMS FROM GROUPS ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Within a group, individuals establish a set of behaviors called roles. These roles set expectations governing relationships. Roles often serve as source of confusion and conflict. While ,teams have a shared understanding on how to perform their role and perceive the other team members' roles. IDENTITY While teams have an identity, groups do not. It is almost impossible to establish the sense of cohesion that characterizes a team without this fundamental step. A team has a clear understanding about what constitutes the team's mission and why it is important. They can describe a picture of what the team needs to achieve, and the norms and values that will guide them. COHESION Teams have esprit that shows a sense of bonding and camaraderie. Esprit is the spirit, soul, and state of mind of the team. It is the overall consciousness of the team that a person identifies with and feels a part of. Individuals begin thinking of the concept "we" rather than "me.“ while in a group the level of cohesion is very low compared to the case of a team. FACILITATE Groups have a tendency to get bogged down with trivial issues. Teams use facilitators to keep the team on the right path. 2.7. FACTORS SEPARATING TEAMS FROM GROUPS COMMUNICATION While members of a group are centered upon themselves, the team is committed to open communication. Team members feel they can state their opinions, thoughts, and feelings without fear. Listening is considered as important as speaking. FLEXIBILITY Most groups are extremely rigid. However, Teams maintain a high level of flexibility, and they perform different task and maintenance functions as needed. The responsibility for team development and leadership is shared. The strengths of each member are identified and used. MORALE Team members are enthusiastic about the work of the team and each person feels pride in being a member of the team. Team spirit is high. To be a successful team, the group must have a strong ability to produce results and a high degree of satisfaction in working with one another. ENCOURAGING GREAT IDEAS As people begin to work together, they become a group. That group may evolve into a team over time. 2.8. THE ADVANTAGES OF TEAM WORK The fact of the matter is that many tasks are beyond the capabilities of one person alone. TEAMS are essential human resources of organizations, and “synergy” is a major benefit that groups can bring to the work setting. TEAMS can make important task contributions to organizational objectives, and they can influence individual work attitudes and behaviors. TEAMS CAN: Increase resources for problem solving Promote innovation and creativity Improve the quality of decision making Enhance members’ commitment to tasks Offer motivation through collective action Control and discipline members. 2.9. THE DISADVANTAGES OF TEAM WORK. SOCIAL PRESSURE: Social pressure is a major force making for conformity. The desire to be a good group member and to be accepted tends to silence disagreement and favors consensus. Majority opinions tend to be accepted regardless of whether or not their objective quality is logically and scientifically sound. Reaching agreement in a group is often confused with finding the right answer. VALENCE OR SOLUTIONS The number of negative and positive responses given to each proposed solution in group discussions of solutions are summarized then it is possible to give for each solution a valance index. The first solution that receives a positive valance of 0.15 for example tends to be adopted to the satisfaction of all participant about 85 percent of the time, regardless of its quality. Higher quality solutions introduced after the critical value for one of the solutions has been reached have little chance of achieving real considerations. The critical valance value of 0.15 appears not to be greatly altered by the nature of the problem or the exact size of the group, Rather it seems to designate a turning point between the idea getting process and the decision making process. (idea evaluation). Since a solution’s valance is independent of its objective quality, this group factor becomes an important liability in group problem solving, even when the value of a decision depends up on objective criteria (facts and logic). 2.9. THE DISADVANTAGES OF TEAM WORK. INDIVIDUAL DOMINATION Hoffman and Maier (1967) found that the mere fact of appointing a leader causes this person to dominate a discussion. Thus regardless of his problem-solving ability a leader tends to exert a major influence on the outcome of a discussion. CONFLICTING SECONDARY GOAL: WINNING THE ARGUMENT. the appearance of several alternatives causes individuals to have preferences and once this emerges the desire to support a position is created. Converting those with neutral viewpoints and refuting those with opposed view points now enter into the problem solving process. More and more the goal becomes that of winning the decision rather than finding the best solution. CONFLICTING INTEREST VERSUS MUTUAL INTERESTS Disagreement in discussion may take many forms, often participants agree with one another with regard to solutions, but when issues are explored one finds that these conflicting solutions are designed to solve different problems. 2.9. THE DISADVANTAGES OF TEAM WORK. TIME REQUIREMENTS In general, more time is required for a group to reach a decision than for a single individual to reach one. Insofar as some problems require quick decision, individual decisions are favored. WHO CHANGES In reaching consensus or agreement, some members of a group must change. Persuasive forces in individual problem solving do not operate in the same way when they operate in a group situation; hence, the changing of some one’s mind is not an issue. IN group situations, however, who changes can be an asset or a liability. If the person with the most constructive views are induced to change the end product suffers, where as if persons with the least constructive point of view changes the end product is upgraded. The leader can upgrade the quality of a decision because his position permits him to protect the person with a minority view and increase his opportunity to influence the majority position. The leader also plays a constructive role in so far as he can facilitate communication and thereby reduce misunderstanding. The leader has an adverse effect on the end product when he suppresses minority views by holding a contrary position and when he uses his office to promote his own views. 2.10. INTERGROUP PROBLEMS IN ORGANIZATIONS 1- how to make them effective in fulfilling both organizational goals and the needs of their members? 2- how to establish conditions between groups which will enhance the productivity of each without destroying intergroup relations and coordination? This problem exists because as groups become more committed to their own goals and norms, they are likely to become competitive with one another and seek to undermine their rival’s activities, there by becoming a liability to the organization as a whole. SOME CONSEQUENCES OF INTER GROUP COMPETITIONS The consequence of inter group competitions can be described in terms of the following categories: WHAT HAPPEN WITHIN EACH COMPETING GROUP? Each group becomes more closely knit and elicits greater loyalty from its members; members close ranks and bury some of their internal differences. Group climate changes from informal, casual, playful to work and task oriented; concern for member’s psychological needs declines while concern for task accomplishment increases. Leadership pattern tend to change from more democratic toward more autocratic; the group becomes more willing to tolerate autocratic leadership 2.10. INTERGROUP PROBLEMS IN ORGANIZATIONS Each group becomes more highly structured and organized Each group demands more loyalty and conformity from its members in order to be able to present a “solid front” WHAT HAPPENS BETWEEN THE COMPETING GROUPS? Each group begins to see the other groups as the enemy, rather than merely a neutral object. Each group begins to experience distortions of perception - it tends to perceive only the best parts of itself, denying its weaknesses and tends to perceive only the worst parts of the other group, denying its strengths; each group is likely to develop a negative stereotype of the other (“They don’t play fair like we do”) Hostility towards the other group increases while interaction and communication with the other group decrease; thus it becomes easier to maintain negative stereotypes and more difficult to correct perceptual distortions. If the groups are forced into interaction for example, if they are forced to listen to representative plead their own and the other’s cause in reference to some task each group is likely to listen to the representative of the other group, except to find fault with his presentation; in other words, group members tend to listen only for that which supports their own position and stereotype. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE WINNER? Winner retains cohesion and may become even more cohesive. Winner tends to release tension, lose its fighting spirit, become complacent, casual and playful . Winner tends toward high intra-group cooperation and concern for members’ needs and low concern for work and task accomplishment. Winner tends to be complacent and to feel that winning has conformed the positive stereotype of the “enemy” group; there is little basis for reevaluating perception, or reexamining group operations in order to learn how to improve them. WHAT HAPPENS TO THE LOSER? there is a strong tendency for the loser to deny or distort the reality of losing; instead, the loser will find psychological escapes like “the judges were biased,” “The judges did not really understand our solution”, the rules of the game were not clearly explained to us, “If luck had not been against us at the one key point; we would have won,” and soon. If loss is accepted, the losing group tends to splinter, unresolved conflicts come to the surface, and fights break out, all in the effort to find the cause for the loss. Loser is more tense, ready to work harder, desperate to find someone or something to blame. The leader, itself, the judges who decided against them, the rules of the game, (the “lean and hungry” state). Loser tends toward low intra group cooperation, low concern for members’ needs and high concern for recouping by working harder. Loser tends to learn a lot about itself as a group because positive stereotype of itself and negative stereotype of the other group are up set by the loss, forcing a revolution of perception; as a consequence, loser is likely to reorganize and become more cohesive and effective, once the loss has been accepted realistically. PREVENTING INTERGROUP CONFLICT The very concept of division of labor and departmentalization of functions leads to groups competition for scarce resources and rewards. It also implies a reduction of communication and interaction between groups, thus making it possible for perceptual distortions to occur. Organization planners need to consider the points given below in order to reduce the intergroup competition and conflict. Relatively greater emphasis must be given to total organizational effectiveness and the role of departments in contributing to it; departments measured and rewarded on the basis of their contribution to the total effort rather than their individual effectiveness. High interaction and frequent communication stimulated between groups to work on problems of intergroup coordination and help; organizational reward must be given partly on the basis of help which groups give to each other. Frequent rotation of members among groups of department to stimulate high degree of mutual understanding and empathy for one anthers problems Avoidance of any win-lose situations groups never put in to the position of competing for some organizational reward; emphasis always placed on pooling resources to maximize organizational effectiveness; rewards shared equally with all the group or department. STRATEGIES FOR MINIMIZING THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES RESULTING FROM GROUPS ALREADY IN COMPETITION INCLUDES: Identifying a common enemy (for example another company to be out performed) Appealing to a common Goal (for example, profits or customer satisfaction) Bringing the representative of the group in to direct contact with one another example - Setting up face - to - face negotiations Training members of the competing groups in group process and inter personal skills. ( for example, engaging them in exercises to increase inter personal awareness and promote harmony) CHAPTER THREE: PROJECT TEAM STAFFING PROFILE AND OPERATION 3.1 Project Team Staffing 3.2 Project Team Profile 3.3 Uniqueness of Project Teams 3.4 Project Team Operation 3.1. STAFFING THE PROJECT TEAM There are a number of important factors that contribute to a successful project, but if one had to single out the most important factor, it would be people. Good people always find a way to make things happen. The project manager’s ability to influence who is assigned to his or her project can have a significant impact on the success of the project. influence can range from very little (e.g., he or she inherits the project team members and must forge a successful team with the people given to him/her), to being told he or she can pick the best people for the job at hand. Typically, however, the actual amount of influence the project manager has in selecting his or her project team falls somewhere between these two extremes. As a result, the project manager must employ a number of different strategies to obtain the best people for his or her project, consistent with the overall objectives of the organization. In lining up people for the project team, the project manager must be flexible, persuasive, and assertive. The successful PM will invest the time necessary to assemble the best project team that the constraints of the project will allow. WHOM TO SELECT The Right Type of Expertise The people whom you select for your project team will depend on the nature of the project. You will want to select the right engineering disciplines, construction trades, and support staffs that will best help you lead and manage a successful project. Each project, with its own unique requirements, will determine how many and which types of knowledge and skills will be required to perform a successful project. WHOM TO SELECT The Right Type of People After you have determined what type of expertise is required for your project, you will want to find good people who possess the right kind of expertise needed on the project. This is where it is critically important that you do as much homework as possible on potential project team members. Assuming you have some say in who will be assigned to your project (and you almost always will have some input as to who will be on your project team—it just varies as to how much input you will have), you want to request the best possible people for your project. The best electrical engineer, the best draftsperson, the best electrical installer, the best heating, ventilating, air conditioning mechanic, etc. Good people solve problems before they become problems; because they typically do, things right the first time. Below are some things you can do to identify the best people for your project team. Your own experience. If you have worked with someone previously and know he or she performs good work, this is the best recommendation you can have because it is first hand. Ask your boss. Your boss, unless he or she is new in the job, will be able to suggest good people for your project team. In a recent engineering project managed by Barry for a client, he relied heavily on his client (to whom he reported) for staffing recommendations, which turned out very well. Recommendation of colleague or friend. Ask people you trust whom they might recommend for the job. A good recommendation from a trusted colleague is very valuable, especially if that person knows the type of work to be performed better than you. Recruit from outside your organization. If there is no one within your organization whom you can recruit to fill an open project team slot, you may need to hire a person from outside your organization. The open position may be one requiring an experienced engineer, craftsperson, CAD operator, etc., or one, which could be filled by a new college graduate, trade school graduate, union training program graduate, or other entry-level person. Special care must be taken in the recruiting process to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations governing recruiting and hiring. Otherwise, you could end up with a lawsuit on your hands (just what you and your company do not need!). STAFFING FROM OUTSIDE THE ORGANIZATION Recruiting and hiring good people is one of the most challenging tasks of a manager. RECRUITING Depending on the size of your organization, you will want to work closely with your human resources department (HRD) to have them help you find the right people for your project. If you have an HRD, by all means use it; if not, you will likely do most of the recruiting effort on your own. Either way, the steps in this section will help you find and hire the right people. 1. Create a job description for the position you are seeking to fill. List the duties and responsibilities of the position as well as the skills required to successfully perform in that position. Make it job-specific and leave out attributes such as gender, age, race, physical appearance, etc. which have no relevancy to the actual job and which could lead to a lawsuit. 2. Identify your sources for the position you are seeking to fill. Your actual approach will depend on your specific needs, the size of your human resources department, and other factors unique to your organization. 3.2 Project Team Profile Project Team Mix The project team consists of the group of people contributing to meet the objectives of the project. Some team members – for example specialists whose expertise is only required for a particular activity over a short time scale – may have very small parts to play in the project as a whole and probably will not feel like part of the close body of people involved in more active and longer lasting roles. However, in the case of a project, it is worth thinking of the project team in the widest possible terms, including: contractor’s personnel subcontractors clients 3.2 Project Team Profile any other interested bodies such as inspectors, government, community groups, and lobby groups. It may not seem like it in practice but it is, in the case of the first four groups at least, in everyone’s best interests to meet the project objectives in a timely and cost-effective manner. This being the case, success is best achieved in a good, open, closeworking relationship. Often, client personnel are seconded into the contractor’s team. Alternatively, and where appropriate, the client may establish an office next to a contractor on the project site. 3.3 Uniqueness of Project Teams It is well established that every project is unique, and thus it could follow that every project team must be unique in order to succeed. The differences between project teams may be marginal or they may be enormous. A project team can consist of two or three people in the case of very small projects, or thousands of people in the case of very large projects. Teams may be all from the same office or they may originate from different companies and work in different geographical locations. They may be full of young people, as in many software projects, or they may be a mixture of young and old, as in many of the more traditional construction projects. They may be male-dominated, female-dominated, or have a good balance. They may be made up of highly-skilled technical experts, or they may be commerce-oriented with no technical staff. Thus, it is sensible to conclude that there is no set skills profile for an effective project team. The skills employed must fully reflect the nature of the project. There are, however, three specialist project management positions that need to be filled: project manager project planner project controller They are effectively the managing director, the operations director and the financial director of the business that is the project. And, although knowledge of the technology underpinning the project is valuable in performing each of these roles – indeed, it is unlikely that anyone without some knowledge of the industry would be employed in such positions – the primary function in each position is a project management one. 3.4 Project Team Operation Reviews of the many team working approaches and techniques that claim to enhance the operation of teams by improving team performance and assisting in the development of good team spirit reveal that they share many similar underlying characteristics. Most team handbooks identify similar objectives and contain common elements. Some typical common areas include those set out next: Establishing measurable objectives. 3.4 Project Team Operation Identify and acknowledge the stakeholders who will determine, on completion of the project, whether or not it has been successful. They may be the client, a project sponsor, members of the project management team or, most likely, some combination of interested individuals and groups. Stakeholder identification, and reconciliation with the project and project team, can be achieved through a stakeholder mapping and management exercise Work with the stakeholders to determine and state explicitly what their dimensions of success are. Use this to establish how good performance could be measured. There may need to be a complex trade-off between the conflicting desires of the various stakeholders. It is likely that multiple measures will be required as no single measure can capture the many dimensions involved. 3.4 Project Team Operation The importance of determining and agreeing criteria for success cannot be overemphasized. It is important to find out what stakeholders’ expectations of success actually are. In many cases they may not have articulated these previously and a great deal of effort may be required to describe, agree and document them. Once this is done, the team can then focus on meeting the requirements without the fear that, despite the team’s best efforts, the stakeholders will deem the project a failure because of expectations of which the project team was not aware. Stakeholders management. Stakeholders are sometimes referred to as the ‘invisible team’. These include all stakeholders who are members of the extended project team outside the immediate project management team. If managed properly, they will provide a great source of support. Protect the image of the team. How the team is perceived from the outside will have a significant bearing on whether it is considered successful or not. It is not enough to do a good job; the good job has to be recognized by people outside the project team. In the case of very large projects, it is not unusual for advertising or public relations people to be employed for this purpose. Develop a network of useful contacts who may be able to help or advise the project team as required. Key relationships should be established. These can help overcome barriers and smooth problems, should they occur. Use the network to identify and provide quality project resources when and where they are required. Establishing and planning measurable targets. Plans should be prepared in a manner that is understandable and that can be used in practice by the members of the project team. · In the first instance, the plans should be prepared at different levels (e.g. overviews for senior managers, detailed plans for operatives) and should contain as much information as is known and is appropriate for the particular level of communication. · Plan for the unknown. Have contingency arrangements in place to cover any unexpected events that might occur. Set realistic and achievable milestones that will act as celebration points throughout the project. These have an important effect on motivation as the project progresses. .Planning and establishing processes. Establish firm ground rules so that participants understand both their own roles and as many aspects of the project as possible – for example, how each individual should respond to people outside the project team in a wide range of circumstances. Plan for creating an environment where team members are energized to air their opinions, take responsibility, and be creative when confronted by problems. The attitude or spirit of the team is important in terms of stimulating thought processes and improving decision making. Develop a plan for managing and developing relationships. Done well, this will keep team morale high, with team members supporting each other, doing things together, making sure that all the team members feel as though they belong, and keeping communication lines open. This will not happen automatically and requires conscious effort by the project manager. The rules should be firm, but they should not be unchangeable should circumstances require it. The project team should operate within a flexible environment and should be able to change in response to changes in the environment – including the evolution of the team itself. Leadership. Strong, credible leadership is required to provide clear direction and stimulate high performance from its members. Continual research is required into ways to improve both the internal and the external workings of the team, and then action on the findings should occur. Rewarding good performance will motivate members. It is also important to ensure that poor performance is not ‘tolerated’. This is important in maintaining motivation. Membership and identity. Team members need to support the project manager for the team to be successful. The project manager requires their respect and must have credibility to carry out the job. The members need to believe in the project manager’s ability to get the job done. Active followership is much more valuable than passive followership, and the project team should support and reward, debate and challenge between its members. Specialists and others drafted into the team temporarily must be seen in a positive light and not considered a nuisance. Team members should clearly understand their roles and what these entail. Team members should be aware of their individual contribution to the project but also recognize their value to the team and the need for cooperation with the team. Communication systems. In order to develop a good working team spirit, formal or informal meetings are important not only from the classic point of view (i.e. meeting to exchange information, solve problems and make decisions) but also for other important purposes such as confirming the group’s identity, providing opportunities for active involvement, reinforcing rules, and celebrating success. Meetings can be very effective if sufficient advance preparation has taken place and they are well run. Accept and address conflict. Establish an effective formal communication system and make use of informal communications. Project managers tend to work more closely with their team members and the relative power of the informal communication network should be exploited. Efficient communication with external bodies is particularly important. The project manager should ensure that adequate communication systems are in place and are functioning correctly. There may be a requirement to work through an interface, such as an internal legal services department. Meetings should always result in actions, preferably documented with time scales and individual or group responsibilities. Team separation. Team members are expected to deliver on time what they agreed to. Being apart from the other team members does not mean they have reduced their expectations. Members should be encouraged to rely on the ability of fellow team members to deliver what they agree to. This leaves individual team members free to manage their own responsibilities without unwarranted distractions. Commitment and momentum have to be maintained even when the team is working in different locations or is unable to meet as regularly as the members might desire. Keeping in regular contact enables clear communication lines. Information technology Recent advances in information technology have brought significant changes to managing projects. Email, the Internet, groupware and client– server technology have enabled project team members to work autonomously at remote locations at any time of the day or night, Monday to Sunday. For the project, this means that some project team members may never need to meet face to face. There are many advantages to making use of IT advances: it reduces the need for specific accommodation and facilities. Video link conference facilities mean that project teams can still meet when · geographically separated. reduced direct interaction can lead to fewer conflicts resulting from personality clashes. records can be kept so that accountability and audit become simpler. team members work under less direct supervision and therefore have greater freedom of action. less control bureaucracy is required. There are also disadvantages, including the following: Supporting individual team members from a remote location can be expensive, especially if another team member needs to visit them, or have them visit, should face-to-face contact be necessary. Loneliness can be a major factor. Project team members are used to working in teams. Many of them are motivated by the daily interaction with their work-mates. There may be fewer opportunities to develop a good team spirit. Managers lose control of work. If there are significant time differences between team members’ locations, co-ordination may be a problem. People often say that video-link conferences are ‘not the same’ as direct face-to-face interaction. Some people have a natural hostility towards the use of advanced IT. IT can always go wrong. It can be very frustrating if the land line or satellite link suddenly goes down mid-conference! Team building processes and the formation of cohesion are severely restricted and the team has to develop alternative approaches to these · Requirements. CHAPTER-4- BUILDING PROJECT TEAMS TRAINING OBJECTIVES: After completing this training trainees will be able to describe and discuss: The five stage of team development Team dynamics and process Leadership styles for team management Team norms and cohesiveness 4.1.BENEFITS FROM TEAM WORK By understanding the benefits of teamwork we can better undertake the tasks associated with team building and team development. motivate potential team members, and set up an environment conducive to teamwork. The benefits of teamwork can be placed into one of four areas: task related benefits, human related benefits, creativity and innovation, and employee participation. A-TASK RELATED BENFITS Task related benefits from teamwork can be put into two categories: production gains and decreased costs. Teamwork helps to improve the quantity and quality of output. "Companies turn more and more to teams because old structures do not adequately respond to marketplace demands or because they see teams as a better way of doing business". reduced operating costs due to the increased productivity, and more effective use of resources. B. Human Related Benefits from Teamwork Teamwork may help the individual to cope with the organizational environment or culture. Katzenbach and Smith "a team opportunity exists anywhere hierarchy or organizational boundaries inhibit the skills and perspectives needed for optimal results". Flattened organizations may benefit from teams, in that the authority to make decisions is given to the teams. C-CREATIVITY AND TEAM WORK Increased creativity may be a benefit from teamwork. Likert wrote in 1961 that "the supportive atmosphere of the highly effective group stimulates creativity. The group does not demand narrow conformity as do the work groups under authoritarian leaders ... the group attaches high value to new, creative approaches and solutions to its problems and to the problems of the organization of which it is a part.". The quality of a team's decision may be better than if the decision was made by individuals. D-PARTICIPATION AND INVOLVEMENT It has been assumed by many modern organizations that worker participation in decision-making is important for productivity and job satisfaction. Etzioni (1975) presented three degrees of participation: 1) a coercive system, 2) a utilitarian system, and 3) a system based on goal consensus. A team based company should be a system based on goal consensus between leaders and followers and on goal consensus based on team goals. Consensus is very difficult for teams to reach, leading to risky shift and groupthink. 4.2. ARGUMENTS AGAINST TEAMWORK Arguments against teamwork are A- misdirected work efforts, B- loss of individual contributions, C- lack of accountability and control, D- groupthink and risky shift, and E- individualism vs. groupism. 4.3. GROUP DEVELOPMENT OVER TIME: THE FIVE-STAGE MODEL All groups change over time as group members come and go; group tasks and goals change; and group members gain experience in interacting with each other. One well-known model of group development is Bruce Tuckman’s five-stage model. The model go through five stages of growth: Forming, Storming,Norming, Performing, and finally Adjourning. While most matrix or cross-functional teams go through these stages, depending upon the team's diversity of its members and purpose, some of the stages may be quite short or last for a period of time. STATGE-1- FORMING In this stage, team members are introduced. They state why they were chosen or volunteered for the team and what they hope to accomplish within the team. Members cautiously explore the boundaries of acceptable group behavior. This is a stage of transition from individual to member status, and testing the leader's guidance both formally and informally. FORMING INCLUDES THESE FEELINGS AND BEHAVIORS: Excitement, anticipation, and optimism Pride in being chosen for the project A tentative attachment to the team Suspicion and anxiety about the task at hand Defining the tasks and how they will be accomplished Determining acceptable group behavior Deciding what information needs to be gathered Activities include abstract discussions of the concepts and issues; and for some members, impatience with these discussions. There is often difficulty in identifying some of the relevant problems as there is so much going on that members get distracted. The team often accomplishes little concerning its goals. This is perfectly normal. STAGE -2- STORMING The team's transition from the "As-Is" to the "To-Be" is called the Storming phase. All members have their own ideas as to how the process should look, and personal agendas are often rampant. Storming is probably the most difficult stage for the team. They begin to realize the tasks that are ahead are different and more difficult than they previously imagined. Impatient about the lack of progress, members argue about just what actions the team should take. STORMING INCLUDES THESE FEELINGS AND BEHAVIORS: Resisting the tasks Resisting quality improvement approaches suggested by other members Sharp fluctuations in attitude about the team's chance of success Arguing among members, even when they agree on the real issues Defensiveness, competition, and choosing sides Questioning the wisdom of those who selected the project and appointed the members of the team Establishing unrealistic goals Disunity, increased tension, and jealousy STAGE -3- NORMING The Norming phase is when the team reaches a consensus on the "To-Be" process. Everyone wants to share the newly found focus. Enthusiasm is high, and the team is often tempted to go beyond the original scope of the process. During this stage, members reconcile competing loyalties and responsibilities. They accept the team, ground rules, roles, and the individuality of fellow members. Emotional conflict is reduced as previously competitive relationships become more cooperative. NORMING INCLUDES THESE FEELINGS AND BEHAVIORS: An ability to express criticism constructively Acceptance of membership in the team An attempt to achieve harmony by avoiding conflict Friendliness, confiding in each other, and sharing of personal problems A sense of team cohesion, spirit, and goals Establishing and maintaining team ground rules and boundaries As team members work out their differences, they have more time and energy to spend on the project. STAGE -4- PERFORMING By now the team has settled its relationships and expectations. They can begin performing by diagnosing, problem solving, and implementing changes. Team members have discovered and accepted other's strengths and weakness. In addition, they have learned what their roles are. Performing includes these feelings and behaviors: Members have insights into personal and group processes An understanding of each other's strengths and weakness Constructive self-change Ability to prevent or work through group problems Close attachment to the team The team is now an effective, cohesive unit. You can tell when your team has reached this stage because you start getting a lot of work done. STAGE -5- ADJOURNING The team briefs and shares the improved process during this phase. When the team finally completes that last briefing, there is always a bittersweet sense of accomplishment coupled with the reluctance to say good-bye. Many relationships formed within these teams continue long after the team disbands. and collaborating together. 4.4. UNDERSTANDING TEAM DYNAMICS/TEAM STRUCTURE AND TEAM PROCESSES 4.4.1. TEAM STRUCTURE The structure of a group reflects the basis of group identity - and indeed the very fact that we can speak of a group at all rather than merely a number of individuals, For structure reflects the established pattern of behavior that are unique within a particular group. THE SIX MAJOR COMPONENTS OF TEAM STRUCTURE ARE THE FOLLOWING: 1-OBJECTIVES:- groups needs to agree on clear objectives and be committed to their achievement. 2-TEAM SIZE:- Group members should not be too few or too much, ideal size must be determined. 3-TEAM NORM:- The group’s shared expectation of its member’s behavior (desirable) 4-TEAM COHESIVENESS:- The attractiveness and closeness group members have for themselves and the group. Factors affecting cohesiveness are 4.4. UNDERSTANDING TEAM DYNAMICS/TEAM STRUCTURE AND TEAM PROCESSES 5-STATUS WITHIN A TEAM: As group member interacts, they develop respect for one another on numerous dimensions. The more respect, prestige, and power a member has the higher will be the person status within the group. Perceived ranking of a member relative to the other. 6. TEAM ROLES: Roles are shared expectation of how group member will fulfill the requirement of their position. TASK (Functional) role:-Things group members do and say that directly aid in the accomplishment of objectives. This role relies on members skills and experiences. Team (maintenance) role :Things group members do and say to develop and sustain its group-dynamics. This role bases members personality, interpersonal and communication ability. Self - interest role:-Things group members do and say in order to meet their own needs at the expense of the group. To be effective, a group must have members who play task roles and maintenance roles, while minimizing self-interest roles. 4.4.2. GROUP PROCESSES/GROUP DYNAMICS Group process is the manner in which group action is constructed on a continuing basis. process emphasize changes in the flow of activities; indeed group process indicate how structure becomes established and how over-time they may changethe subjective perception of group members and their-active involvement in group life. All groups are unique, their dynamics change over a period of timeGroup development stags can be analyzed as a five-stage model which involves the following points. STAGE 1- ORIENTATION STAGE Low development level High commitment and low competence When people first form a group they tend to come to the group with a moderate to high commitment to the group. However because they have not worked together, they don’t have the competence to achieve the task. When first interacting members tend to have anxiety over how they will fit in, what will be required of them what the group will be like, purpose of the group and so forth. If roles and group objectives are never clearly stated and understood by its members, it is difficult to develop as a group. STAGE 2- DISSATISFACTION Moderate development level Lower commitment and some competence. As members work together for some time they tend to become dissatisfied with the group. Members start to question: why am I a member? Is the group going to accomplish anything? Why don’t other group members do what is expected? Groups stuck in this stage of development are characterized by demoralization, low motivation and low productivity. They never progress to being satisfied with the group and learning to perform as a team as long as they are in stage 2. 4.5.2. GROUP PROCESSES/GROUP DYNAMICS STAGE 3- RESOLUTION High development level Variable commitment and high competence With time, members often resolve the difference between initial expectation and realities in relation to the objectives, tasks, skills and so forth. As members develop competence they often become more satisfied with the group. Relation develop that satisfy group members’ affiliation needs. They learn to work together as they develop a group structure with acceptable norm and cohesiveness. The group must develop a positive group structure to move to the next stage of group development. 4.5.2. GROUP PROCESSES/GROUP DYNAMICS STAGE 4- PRODUCTION Outstanding development level High commitment and competence commitment and competence don’t fluctuate much. High level of satisfaction of affiliation needs. The group maintain a positive group structure. Members are productive and open to each other. STAGE 5- TERMINATION It does occur for a task group. Members experience feeling about leaving the group. In group that have progressed through all the four stages of development, members usually feel sad that the group is ending. In groups that did not progress through. The four stags, members experience relief. 4.4.3. TEAM BEHAVIOR AND LEADERSHIP STYLE Team Behavior Successful team leadership depends on the ability to develop both team building and task management behavior. SOME KEY TEAM BEHAVIORS Proposing and initiating - proposing ideas and courses of action which are Building and summarizing relevant to the task- Developing other people’s proposals Gate keeping- Opening - Positively attempting to involve others closing- attempting to control or cut off others. Diagnosing - Analyzing what is wrong or the cause of a particular situation. encouraging - Being friendly, supportive and responsive to other people by verbal and non-verbal means. 4.4.3. TEAM BEHAVIOR AND LEADERSHIP STYLE Giving and seeking- Offering and seeking appropriate information Conflict resolution- Being prepared to acknowledge and deal with conflict. Evaluating- Weighing up the merits of proposal and out comes. Giving feed back- Giving appropriate feed back on people’s contributions. Dealing with feeling- Recognizing and acknowledging people’s feeling looking after physical needs- Meeting such needs as adequate amenities, space, refreshment etc---Decision making- Contributing to decisions on a particular proposal or course of action. DYSFUNCTIONAL BEHAVIORS: These activities typically hinder the development of a group, its maintenance, and its ability to accomplish goals. In general, blocking functions are dysfunctional for group progression on any scale. AGGRESSOR Deflating others’ status,- attacking the group or its value; joking in a barbed or semi-concealed way. BLOCKER - Disagreeing and opposing beyond reason; resisting stubbornly the groups wish for personally oriented reasons; using hidden agenda to thwart the movement of a group. DOMINATOR- Asserting authority of superiority to manipulate group or certain of its members; controlling by means of flattery or other form of patronizing behavior. SHOWOFF - Making scene over one’s lack of involvement; abandoning the group while remaining physically with it, seeking recognition in ways not relevant to group task. AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOUR- Pursuing special interest not related to task; Staying off subject to avoid commitment; preventing group from facing up to controversy. 4.5. TEAM MANAGEMENT - LEADERSHIP STYLES Approaches to team management may vary, from telling to delegating, using more or less authority and allowing team members to have more or less freedom to participate in team decisions. The appropriate leadership style in team management depends on the following factors: The leader own natural style as a management The nature of the team The leader own level of power-level of authority given to the team leader The structure of the task or project; the less structured the task the more a participative leadership style may be appropriate. Supervisory style for team management following the team development stage over its life. GROUP DEVELOPMENT LEVEL SUPERVISORY STYLES 1-LOW DEVELOPMENT AUTOCRATIC STYLE High commitment and low competence High task and low maintenance Provide direction so that the group has clear objective and members know their roles. members come to the group committed but they can not perform with competence Make the decision for the group 2-MODERATE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTATIVE STYLE Low commitment and some competence High task and high maintenance continue members have become to direct the group so it develops task ability. dissatisfied with the group. They have Provide maintenance to regain commitment started to develop competence but are frustrated with result. 3-HIGH DEVELOPMENT Variable commitments and high provide little as the group structure take place include members’ in put in decisions. PARTICIPATIVE STYLE Low task and high maintenance competence. Commitments changes over an effective direction. Focus on developing time while production remains relatively group participate group structure. Have the constant in decision making. 4-OUTSTANDING DEVELOPMENT LAISSEZ - FAIR STYLE High commitment and high competence Low task and low maintenance members commitment remains constantly high provide their own task and maintenance so does production roles and the supervisor is a group member. Allow the group to make its own decisions. 4.6. INFLUENCING TEAM NORMS AND COHESIVENESS FOR INCREASED TEAM EFFECTIVENESS The norms and cohesiveness of any group, formal or in formal, interrelate with one another to affect the behavior of group members. Managers should therefore be skilled at influencing norms and cohesion in ways that support high level of task performance and member satisfaction. Group effectiveness will be enhanced as a result. BUILDING POSITIVE NORMS: The appropriate focus for norm-building efforts varies with each of the four stages of group development. Because group norms are largely determined by the collective will of group members, it is difficult for a manger simply to dictate which norms a given work group will adopt. Instead a manager must use knowledge of group dynamics to help and encourage group members to adopts norms supportive of organizational objectives. Among the things a manager can do are the following. Act as a positive role model reinforce the desired behaviors via rewards Control results by performance reviews and regular feed back. Train and orient new members to adopt desired behaviors. Hold regular meetings to discuss group progress, and ways of improving task performance and member satisfaction Use group decision-making methods to reach agreement on appropriate behavior GROUP COHESIVENESS:Conformity to norms is largely determined by a group’s cohesiveness, the degree to which members are attracted to and motivated to remain part of the group. Persons in a highly cohesive group value their membership and strive to maintain positive relationship with other group members. They tend to conform to group norms as a result. Group cohesiveness is affected by a variety of personal and situation variables. Cohesion tends to be high in groups whose members share similar attitudes, socioeconomic backgrounds, needs and other individual attributes. When members respect and hold one another’s competencies in high esteem, cohesiveness is also likely to be high. Situational factors that enhance group cohesion include agreement on group goals, small size of membership, tasks requiring a high degree of interdependence, physical isolation from other groups, performance success, and performance failure or crisis. COHESION, SATISFACTION, AND PERFORMANCE Cohesive groups are good for their members. Members of highly cohesive groups are concerned about their group’s activity and achievement. They tend to be more energetic in working on group activities, to be less likely to be absent, to feel happy about performance success and to be displeased about failures. cohesive groups generally have stable memberships and faster feelings of loyalty, security and high self-esteem among members. Thus they satisfy a full range of individual needs. A basic rule of group dynamics is that the more cohesive the group, the greater the conformity of members to group norms. When the performance norm of a group is positive, high cohesion and resulting conformity to norms has a very beneficial effect. When the performance norm is negative in a cohesive group, however, high conformity can have undesirable results. The worst situation for a manager is a highly cohesive work group with negative performance norms. Here productivity will probably suffer as members restrict individual work efforts to levels consistent with the group’s negative performance norm. INFLUENCING COHESION: There are times a manger may want to build cohesiveness in work groups for example, when trying to increase conformity to a positive performance norm There may also be times when the objective is break down cohesiveness, such as when group members exhibit high conformity to a negative performance norm.. In order to increase cohesion a manager can: Induce agreement on group goals Increase membership homogeneity Increase interactions among members Decrease group size Introduce competition with other groups Reward group rather than individuals results. Provide physical isolation from other group. 2. IN ORDER TO DECREASE COHESION A MANAGER CAN: Foster disagreement on group goals Increase membership heterogeneity Restrict interaction among members Increase group size Reward individual result rather than group Remove physical isolation Introduce a dominating member Disband the group 4.6.GROUPTHINK:Members of highly cohesive groups may publicly agree with actual or suggested solution or course of actions, while privately having serious personal reservations Strong feeling of loyalty can result in an inability of group members to critically evaluate one anther’s ideas and suggestions. Desire to retain cohesion, hold the group together, and avoid disagreement can lead to an over emphasis on agreement and biased decision making. * Symptoms indicating that “Group think” may be occurring: Illusion of group invulnerability. Members of the group feel it is basically beyond criticism or attack. Rationalizing unpleasant and disconfirming data-refusal to accept contradictory data or to consider alternative thoroughly. GROUPTHINK:Belief in inherent group morality. Members of the group feel it is ‘right’ and above any reproach by outsiders. Stereotyping competitors as weak, evil, and stupid. Refusal to look realistically at other groups. Applying direct pressure to deviants to conform to group wishes. Refusal to tolerate a member who suggests the group may be wrong. Self-censorship by members. refusal by members to communicate personal concerns to the group as a whole. Illusionsofunanimity.Acceptingconsensus prematurely without testing its completeness. Mind guarding. 4.7.DETERMINANTS OF TEAMS' EFFECTIVENESS The key components making up effective teams can be subsumed into four general categories. work design. the team’s composition. resources and other contextual influences that make teams effective. the process variables that reflect the things that go on in the team and that influence group effectiveness. Team effectiveness means typically that objective measure of the team’s productivity, manager’s ratings of the team’s performance, and aggregate measures of member satisfaction. 4.7.1. WORK DESIGN Effective teams need to work together and take collective responsibility to complete significant tasks. THE WORK DESIGN CATEGORY INCLUDES VARIABLES SUCH AS: freedom and autonomy, the opportunity to utilize different skills and talents, the ability to complete a whole and identifiable task or product, working on a task or project that has a substantial impact on others. evidence indicates that these characteristics enhance member motivation and increase team effectiveness. These work design characteristics motivate because they increase members’ sense of responsibility and ownership over the work and because they make the work more interesting to perform. 4.7.2. COMPOSITION Several team composition factors are important to a team’s effectiveness. These include team member abilities, personality, and role allocation, and diversity, size of teams, member flexibility, and member preferences. Part of a team’s performance depends on its members’ knowledge, skills, and abilities. Research has shown that to perform effectively, a team needs three different types of skills. First, it needs people with technical expertise. Next, it needs members with problem-solving and decisionmaking skills. Finally, a team needs people with interpersonal skills. 4.7.3.PERSONALITY: Personality has a significant influence on individual employee behavior. Five personality model have been shown to be relevant to team effectiveness. Specifically, teams that are rated more highly in mean levels of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability tend to receive higher managerial ratings for team performance. Another interesting finding related to personality is that “One bad apple can spoil the barrel”. A single team member who lacks performance. So including just one person who is low on agreeableness, conscientiousness, or extraversion can result in strained internal processes and decreased overall performance. 4.7.4. ALLOCATING ROLES AND DIVERSITY: teams do have different needs, and people should be selected for a team to ensure that there is diversity and that all various roles are filled. WE CAN IDENTIFY NINE POTENTIAL TEAM ROLES. Linker (coordinates and integrates) creator (initiates creative ideas), promoter (champions ideas after they are initiated), assessor (offer insightful analysis of options), organizer (provide structure), producer (provide direction and follow – through) controller (examines details and enforces rules) maintainer (fights external battles) Advisor (encourages the search for more information). Teams have people to fill all these roles and have selected people to play in these roles based on their skills and preferences. Size of Teams: the most effective teams are neither very small (under four or five members) nor very large (over a dozen). Member Flexibility: Teams made up of flexible individuals have members who can complete each other’s tasks. Selecting members who value flexibility and then cross-training them to be able to do each other’s jobs should lead to higher teams performance over time. Member Preferences: Not every employee is a team player. Given the option, many employees will select themselves out of team participation. High performing teams are likely to be composed of people who prefer working as part of a group. 4.7.5. CONTEXT The three contextual factors that appear to be most significantly related to team performance are Adequate Resources: In our work group model, we acknowledged that a work group is part of a larger organization system. All work teams rely on resources outside the group to sustain. And a scarcity of recourses directly reduces the ability of the team to perform its job effectively Leadership and Structure: Team members must agree on who is to do what and ensure that all members contribute equally in sharing the workload. Additionally, the team needs to determine how schedules will be set, what skills need to be developed, how the group will resolve conflicts, and how the group will make and modify decisions. Performance Evaluation and Reward System: How do you get team members to be both individually and jointly accountable? The traditional, individually oriented evaluation and reward system must be modified to reflect team performance. 4.7.6. PROCESS INCLUDES: A Common Purpose. Effective teams have a common and meaningful purpose that provides direction, momentum and commitment for members. Specific Goals. Successful teams translate their common purpose into specific, measurable, and realistic performance goals. Goals lead individuals to higher performance, goals also energize teams. Team Efficacy. Effective teams have confidence in themselves. They believe they can succeed. We call this team efficacy. Success breeds success. Two possible options are helping the team to achieve small successes and providing skill training. Small successes build team confidence. In addition, managers should consider providing training to improve members’ technical and interpersonal skills. Conflict Levels. Conflict on a team isn’t necessarily bad. Conflict can actually improve team effectiveness. Task conflicts stimulate discussion, promote critical assessment of problems and options, and can lead to better team decisions. Social Loafing. Effective teams undermine this tendency by holding themselves accountable at both the individual and team levels. Successful teams make members individually and jointly accountable for the team’s purpose, goals and approach. They are clear on what they are individually responsible for and what they are jointly responsible for. 4.8. REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE TEAM LEADERSHIP Becoming an effective team leader requires: learning to share information, developing the ability to trust others, learning to give up authority; and knowing when to leave their teams alone and when to intercede. New roles that team leaders take on include managing the team’s external boundary and facilitating the team process. 5.2. THE ROLEOF EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION FOR TEAM PRODUCTIVITY 5.2.1. INTRODUCTION Communication is an essential part of most aspects of management. Whenever you discuss a problem with a work team, interview a potential employee, discuss a change initiative with those you manage, or investigate a customer’s needs, you need to communicate effectively. To be successful or effective as a manager you need to understand what is involved in communication and develop your skills in this area. Many of the problems that occur in an organization are the direct result of people failing to communicate. Faulty communication causes the most problems. It leads to confusion and can cause a good plan to fail. As a manager studying the communication process is important because you coach, coordinate, counsel, evaluate, and supervise through this process. It is the chain of understanding that integrates the members of an organization from top to bottom, bottom to top, and side to side. 5.2.2. THE COMMUNICATION PROCESS Communication can be defined as the process by which people attempt to share meaning via the transmission of symbolic messages. The word communication is derived from the Latin word “communes”, meaning “common”, the communicator seeks to establish commonness with a receiver by transmitting information and understanding using common symbols. Organizational communication refers to the communication that is taking place in an organizational setting. The success of an organization depends on the effectiveness of organizational members communication. Effective organizational communication can create a common understanding of organizational objective and its achievement between management and workers. During the transmitting of the message, two processes will be received by the receiver: content and context. Content is the actual words or symbols of the message which is known as language - the spoken and written words combined into phrases that make grammatical and semantic sense. We all use and interpret the meanings of words differently, so even simple messages can be misunderstood. And many words have different meanings to confuse the issue even more. 5.2.2. THE COMMUNICATION PROCESS Context is the way the message is delivered and is known as Paralanguage - it includes the tone of voice, the look in the sender's eye's, body language, hand gestures, and state of emotions (anger, fear, uncertainty, confidence, etc.) that can be detected. Although paralanguage or context often causes messages to be misunderstood as we believe what we see more than what we hear; they are powerful communicators that help us to understand each other. Indeed, we often trust the accuracy of nonverbal behaviors more than verbal behaviors. Some leaders think they have communicated once they told someone to do something, "I don't know why it did not get done...I told Jim to do it." More than likely, Jim misunderstood the message. A message has NOT been communicated unless it is understood by the receiver (decoded). How do you know it has been properly received? By two-way communication or feedback. This feedback tells the sender that the receiver understood the message, its level of importance, and what must be done with it. Communication is an exchange, not just a give, as all parties must participate to complete the information exchange. A COMMUNICATION MODEL *** *** THE SENDER *** ENCODING MESSAGE&MEDIUM DECODING *** FEEDBACK **** noise RECEIVER*** 5.2.3. INTERPRETING INFORMATION Perception is the cognitive process by which an individual give meaning to the environment through input skills. It is the process through which people receive and interpret information from the environment. It is the way we process information into the decisions that ultimately guide our actions, our perceptual accuracy is intern affected by our value, needs, cultural background and other circumstances of the moment. In order to understand perceptual differences, you need to be on guard to make your own perception as accurate as possible, you must also anticipate, recognize and be prepared to react to the perceptions of others. Perceptual distortions lead to inaccurate impression which intern can lead to biased decisions and in appropriate actions. THE FOUR COMMON PERCEPTUAL DISTORTIONS 1. STEREO TYPES A stereo type occurs when an individual is identified with a group or category, and then the attributes associated with the group or category is assigned to the individual in question 2. HALO EFFECTS A halo effect occurs when one attribute is used to develop an overall impression of a person or situation. This involves generalization from only one attribute to the total person or event. When meeting a person for the first time, for example, the halo effect may cause one trait such as a pleasant smile to result in a positive first impression. Halo effect cause the same problem for managers as do stereotypes cause individual differences to be obscured. This is especially significant in respect to a manager's views of subordinates' work performance. THE FOUR COMMON PERCEPTUAL DISTORTIONS 3. SELECTIVE PERCEPTION The tendency to single out for attention those aspects of a situation or person that reinforce or appear consistent with one's existing beliefs, values, or needs. Selective perception can bias a manager's views on situations and individuals. One way to reduce its impact is together additional information or opinions from other source to get the chance to improve perceptual accuracy. 4. PROJECTION Projection is the assignment of personal attributes to other individuals. A classic projection error is assuming other persons share our need desires and values. MANAGING THE PERCEPTION PROCESS A manager who is skilled in the perception process will: 1. Have a high level of self-awareness. Individual needs, experience, and expectation can all affect perception. 2. Seek information from various sources to conform or disconfirm personal impressions of a decisions situation. 3. Be empathetic- that is being able to see a situation as it is perceived by other people. Different people will define the same situation some what differently. 4. Avoid common perceptual distortions that bias our views of people and situations. These distortions include the use of stereotypes, halo effect, selective perception and projections. 5. Influence the perception of other people when they are drawing incorrect or incomplete impressions of events in the work setting. People act in terms of their perceptions. 5.2.4. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION There are several barriers to effective communication that can exist both in organizational and interpersonal communication. the major factors are discussed here under. 1. FRAME OF REFERENCE: Different individuals can interpret the same communication differently depending on their previous experiences. 5.2.4. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION This results in variations in the encoding and decoding process. Communication specialists agree that this is the most important factor that break down the “Commonness” in communication. When the encoding and decoding process are not alike, communication tends to break down. 2. SELECTIVE LISTENING: This is a form of selective perception in which we tend to block out new information, especially if it conflicts with what we believe. When we receive a directive from Mgt. we notice only those things that reaffirm our beliefs. Those things that conflict with our preconceived notions we either do not note at all or we 5.2.4. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION 3. VALUE JUDGMENT In every communication situation, value judgments are made by the receiver. This basically involves assigning an over all worth to a message prior to receiving the entire communication. Value judgments may be based on the receiver's evaluation of the communicator or previous experience with the communicator or on the message's anticipated meaning. 4. SOURCE CREDIBILITY Source credibility is the trust, confidence, and faith that the receiver has in the words and actions of the communicator. The level of credibility the receiver assigns to the communicator in turn directly affects how the receiver views and reacts to wards ideas, and actions of the communicator. Thus, how subordinates view a communication from their manager is affected by their evaluation of the manager. This, of course, is heavily influenced by previous experiences with the manager. 5.2.4. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION 5. FILTERING Filtering a common occurrence in upward communication in organizations refers to the manipulation of information so that the receiver perceives it as positive. Subordinates cover up unfavorable information in messages to their superiors. This is because of the influence of the superior. 6. IN GROUP LANGUAGE Often, occupation, professional, and social groups develop words or phrases that have meaning only to members, such special language can serve many useful purposes. It can provide members with feelings of belongingness, cohesiveness, and in many cases, self 5.2.4. BARRIERS TO EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION 8. TIME PRESSURE The pressure of time is an important barrier to communication. An obvious problem is that managers do not have the time to communicate frequently with every subordinate; however, time pressure often can lead to far more series problems than this. Short-circuiting is a failure of the formally prescribed communication system that often results from time pressure. What it means is that some one has been left out of the formal channel of communication that normally would be included. 9. TUNNEL VISION Tunnel vision Refers to a person's attempt to place an imaginary restriction on approaches to problem solving. It is perceptual problem that is to limit possible alternatives and being in a narrow direction to look for solutions. 10. DEFENSIVE ATTITUDE - LACK OF OPENNESS TO THE COMMUNICATION PROCESS Defensive attitude is a real barrier to communication since the person’s emotions will clouds the issues and perceptions of the message. It is unhealthy reaction, as the person with defensive attitude seems to expect to have to defend themselves or their work. People with defensive attitude usually concentrate on rebuttal arguments and blame others for their reactions as a result they fail to get the views of others and creating understanding on issues communicated to them. 5.2.5. ACTIVE LISTENING Listening is divided into two main categories: passive and active. Passive listening is little more that hearing. It occurs when the receiver or the message has little motivation to listen carefully, such as music, story telling, television, or being polite. People speak at 100 to 175 words per minute, but they can listen intelligently at 600 to 800 words per minute (WPM). Since only a part of our mind is paying attention, it is easy to go into mind drift - thinking about other things while listening to someone. The cure for this is active listening - which involves listening with a purpose. It may be to gain information, obtain directions, understand others, solve problems, share interest, see how another person feels, show support, etc. It requires that the listener attends to the words and the feelings of the sender for understanding. It takes the same amount or more energy than speaking. It requires the receiver to hear the various messages, understand the meaning, and then verify the The following suggestions can improve your helpfulness as an empathic listener. Use a variety of response styles, as appropriate Talk less and listen more Avoid being Judgmental Listen for feelings as well as ideas 5.3. THE NATURE OF CONFLICTS IN ORGANIZATIONS AND CONFLICT MANAGEMNT STYLES WHAT IS CONFLICT? Conflict is a natural part of working in groups, because different people have different ideas and viewpoints. Sooner or later, every leader will have to deal with a conflict between two or more people. Conflict can be defined as, a “disagreement between two or more individuals or groups, with each individual or group trying to gain acceptance of its views or objectives over the other.” Because people differ in their attitudes, values and goals, conflict among them becomes unavoidable. Accordingly management is concerned not so much with eliminating conflict that would be impossible but to contain it and manage it for organizational as well as individual benefit. Some degree of conflict in an organization is not only unavoidable but also necessary. TYPES OF CONFLICT SITUATIONS There are five basic types of conflicts. These are :- 1-Conflict within the individual. The conflict within the individual is usually value related, where role playing expected of the individual does not conform to the values and beliefs held by the individual. For example, a secretary may have to lie on instructions that her boss is not in the office to avoid an unwanted visitor or an unwanted telephone call. 2- Interpersonal Conflict. Interpersonal conflict involves conflict between two or more individuals and is probably the most common and most recognized conflict. This may involve conflict between two managers who are competing for limited capital and manpower resources. TYPES OF CONFLICT SITUATIONS 3- Conflict between the individual and the group. As it is known, all formal groups and informal groups have established certain norms of behavior and operational standards which all members are expected to adhere to. 4- Inter-group conflict. An organization is an interlocking network of groups, departments, sections or work teams. The intergroup conflicts are not so much personal in nature as they are due to factors inherent in the organizational structure. 5- Inter-organizational Conflict. Conflict also occurs between organizations which are dependent upon each other in some way. This conflict may be between organizations and supplier organizations about quantity, quality and delivery time’s raw materials and other policy issues. 4.3.3. THE CAUSES OF CONFLICT Communicational aspects of conflict. Poor communication, though not reflecting substantive differences, can have a powerful effect in causing conflict. Misunderstood or partial information during the process of communication can make the difference between the success and the failure of a tasks and may such failure for which the responsibility becomes difficult to trace can cause conflict between the sender of the communication and the receiver of the communication Behavioral aspects of conflict. These conflicts arise out of human thoughts and feelings, emotions and attitudes, values and perceptions and reflect some basic traits of a personality. Structural aspect of conflict. These conflicts arise due to issues related to the structural design of the organization as a whole as well as the design of its sub-units. Some of the structurally related factors are: Size of the organization. The larger the size of the organization, the more basis of existence of conflict. Line-staff distinction. One of the frequently mentioned and 4.3.3. THE CAUSES OF CONFLICT Participation. It is assumed that if the subordinates are not allowed to participate in the decision making process, then they will show resentment which will induce conflict Role ambiguity. A role reflects a set of activities associated with a certain position in the organization. If these work activities are ill defined then the person who is carrying out these activities will not be able to perform as others expect him to, because his role is not clearly defined. Design of work flow. Poorly designed work flow structures and poorly planned coordination requirements lead to intergroup problems and conflicts, specially where tasks are interdependent Scarcity of resources. When individuals and units must share such resources as capital, facilities, staff assistance and so on, and these resources are scarce and there is a severe competition to obtain these resources, then conflict can become quite intense. 4.3.4. MANAGING BEHAVIORAL CONFLICT Some of the primary strategies for dealing with and reducing the impact of behavioral conflict are discussed as follows. AVOIDANCE. In certain situations, it may be advisable to take a passive role and ignore the conflict altogether. From the manager’s point view, it may be especially necessary, when getting involved in a situation involving conflict would provoke further controversy or when the conflict is so trivial in nature that it would not be worth the manager’s time to get involved and try to solve it. 4.3.4. MANAGING BEHAVIORAL CONFLICT FORCING: As Webber puts it, “the simplest conceivable resolution is the elimination of the other party – to force opponents to flee and give up the fight – or slay them. This is a technique of domination where the dominator has the power and authority to enforce his own views over the opposing conflicting party. This technique is potentially effective in situations such as a president of company firing a manager because he is considered as a troublemaker and conflict creator. The outcome of using this technique is always one party being a loser the other party being a clear winner. 4.3.4. MANAGING BEHAVIORAL CONFLICT PROBLEM SOLVING: This technique involves “confronting the conflict” in order to seek the best solution to the problem. This approach objectively assumes that in all organizations, no matter how well they are managed, there will be differences of opinions which must be resolved through discussions and respect for differing viewpoints. In general, this technique is very useful in resolving conflicts arising out of semantic misunderstandings.