An evaluation of the sustainability of Salford Quays Regeneration
How will you be assessed?
a) Data Presentation – Salford Quays Environmental Radial Graphs
o
You will be given credit for quality of presentation. Your text should be uniform in font, borders the same,
maps presented well, graphs with identical axis.
b) Evaluate the sustainability of the regeneration of Salford Quays Write an evaluation in your exercise book.
This evaluation should refer to your data presentation (tour and radial graphs) and your secondary data. You
should refer to the recommended structure outlined below
Recommended structure for Evaluation (2):
Introduction:
Main section 1: Is Salford Quays economically sustainable?
Main section 2: Is Salford Quays socially sustainable?
Main section 3: Is Salford Quays environmentally sustainable?
Conclusion
What are your findings, is Salford Quays an example of sustainable regeneration?
Marking code
E+
EEv+
EvConc+
Conc ?
-/+V
Marking Code
? and a Circle
Evaluation
Well developed explanation using linked
sentences
This explanation should be improved
Good use of evidence to support your
point
You need to use some evidence to
support this point
Your conclusion is good, well done.
You should aim to improve your
conclusion – look at the next grade up in
the assessment criteria document
You have misunderstood something here,
aim to clarify your point.
Relates to the strength of your
geographical vocabulary
Data Presentation
Something could be improved here, look
at the assessment criteria/model answer
and annotate on what you think this
could be.
Pupil Actions:
1. Where you have been given any E-, Ev-,
Conc – or V- you should improve this part
of your work. Any improved work should
be framed with a highlighted box, so that I
know what to mark next time.
2. Where there are no (–) on your piece of
work, well done, your work is perfect!
Please complete the challenge task below.
3. CHALLENGE TASK
Some people believe that regeneration is
not usually successful, because local people
are displaced/ outpriced. How would you
ensure that in future regeneration projects,
that this does not happen? Answer this
question in your exercise books in the
space provided.
Assessment Criteria
You have been awarded Grade 5 because your evaluation includes some advantages and
disadvantages that are relevant to the argument and you sometimes develop your points with linked
sentences. In order to get Grade 6 you needed to develop your explanations further.
You have been awarded Grade 6 because your advantages and disadvantages are all well
explained with linked sentences showing good understanding of the issues. The conclusion reflects the
arguments presented and offers some justification for the decision. Some geographical vocabulary is used.
In order to get Grade 7 you needed to develop your explanations by referring to facts and figures from the
sources.
Well done, you have been awarded Grade 7
In addition to grade 6 you use data from the
sources to support your arguments and you come to a reasonable conclusion. Well done. In order to get a
higher grade you need to show greater understanding of the views of different interest groups in the
regeneration.
Well done, you have been awarded Grade 8. You wrote a strong evaluation showing very
good understanding of the issues and how they affect different interest groups. You develop your
explanations well by referring to data and examples to support your points consistently. You write a strong
conclusion that reflects the arguments you present.
Well done, you have been awarded Grade 9.
In addition to level 8 your evaluation shows that you have an excellent knowledge of the strengths and
weaknesses of this regeneration project, including reference to some of the more complex themes around
regeneration and sustainability. Great work!