12/30/23, 3:14 PM Ronald Takakis Hiroshima - 2111 Words | 123 Help Me Searc Sign in to 123helpme.com with Google 123Helpme > Ronald Takakis Hiroshima Sameer kumar sameerkmar190@gmail.com Continue as Sameer To create your account, Google will share your name, email address, and profile picture with 123helpme.com. Ronald Takakis Hiroshima 2111 Words • 5 Pages Although WW II ended over 50 years ago there is still much discussion as to the events which ended the War in the Pacific. The primary event which historians attribute to this end are the use of atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although the bombing of these cities did force the Japanese to surrender, many people today ask “Was the use of the atomic bomb necessary to end the war?” and more importantly “Why was the decision to use the bomb made?” Ronald Takaki examines these questions in his book Hiroshima. The official reason given for dropping the bomb was to bring a quick end to tht war and save American lives. However, Takaki presents many different explanations as to why the decision to use the bomb was made. He disagrees with the popular belief that the decision to use the bomb was made solely to quickly end the war in the Pacific and to save American lives. Takaki presents theories such as international concerns, American sentiment, and racism in anDocument attempt to more fully explain Open why this decision was made. https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Ronald-Takakis-Hiroshima-84454 1/14 Related 12/30/23, 3:14 PM Ronald Takakis Hiroshima - 2111 Words | 123 Help Me Truman’s Horrible Mistake to Use the Atomic Bomb 2960 Words | 6 Pages The war was coming to a victorious conclusion for the Allies. Germany had fallen, and it was only a matter of time until Japan would fall as well. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson was at the forefront of the American war effort, and saw atomic weaponry as a way out of the most monumental war ever. As discussed in Cabell Phillips’ book, The Truman Presidency: The History of a Triumphant Succession, Stimson was once quoted as saying that the atomic bomb has “more effect on human affairs than the theory of Copernicus and the Law of Gravity” (55). Stimson, a defendant of dropping the bomb on Japan, felt that the world would never be the same. If the world would change after using atomic weapons, could it possibly have changed for the better? One would think not. However, that person might be weary of the biased opinion of White House personnel. He or she should care more for the in depth analytical studies done by experts who know best as to why America should or should not have dropped the atomic bomb. As more and more evidence has been presented to researchers, expert opinion on whether or not the United States should have dropped the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has also changed. More and more researchers seem to feel that the Open atomicDocument bomb should never have been used (Alperovitz 16). Despite several officials’ claims to https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Ronald-Takakis-Hiroshima-84454 3/14 12/30/23, 3:14 PM Ronald Takakis Hiroshima - 2111 Words | 123 Help Me decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. The controversy remains of whether or not atomic bombs should have been used during the war. After studying this text, it is clear that the first atomic bomb, which was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, was a necessary military tactic on ending the war. The second bomb, which was dropped on Nagasaki, however, was an unnecessary measure in Read More ensuring a surrender from the Japanese, and was only used to seek revenge.… Atomic Bomb Dbq 1981 Words | 4 Pages The United States of America’s use of the atomic bomb on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has spurred much debate concerning the necessity, effectiveness, and morality of the decision since August 1945. After assessing a range of arguments about the importance of the atomic bomb in the termination of the Second World War, it can be concluded that the use of the atomic bomb served as the predominant factor in the end of the Second World War, as its use lowered the morale, industrial resources, and military strength of Japan. The Allied decision to use the atomic bomb not only caused irreparable physical damage on two major Japanese cities, Read More but its use also minimized the Japanese will to continue fighting. These two factors along… Prompt And Utter Destruction Analysis 1521 Words | 4 Pages Open Document https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Ronald-Takakis-Hiroshima-84454 5/14 12/30/23, 3:14 PM Ronald Takakis Hiroshima - 2111 Words | 123 Help Me The Atomic Bombs 734 Words | 2 Pages As World War 2, came to a close, The United States unleashed a secret atomic weapon upon the enemy nation of Japan that was quickly recognized as the most powerful wartime weapon in human history. They completely destroyed the entire Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and essentially vaporized countless innocent Japanese lives. Some historians believe that it was a foolish, brutal decision to use the atomic bomb on a weakened Japan, and that the civilians of the country did not deserve that kind of massannihilation. On the opposite side, other historians assert that dropping the bomb saved countless American and Japanese lives by ending the war faster than a regular invasion would have. What is undisputed is that this sad Read More event dramatically changed the course of human history.… Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan 684 Words | 2 Pages In May of 1945, with Germany’s surrender, the Allied forces achieved victory in Europe. However, World War II was not over, and fighting continued against the Japanese in the Pacific. To finally end the war, United States president at the time, Harry Truman, made the decision to drop the newly invented Atomic Bomb on two Document navel bases in Japan:Open Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Ronald-Takakis-Hiroshima-84454 7/14 12/30/23, 3:14 PM Ronald Takakis Hiroshima - 2111 Words | 123 Help Me end the war before it was necessary to carry out a full scale invasion. New developments in science had made it possible for the United States to weaponize the atom, and the consequent bomb created was dropped on Hiroshima and later Nagasaki at the approval of President Harry S. Truman and his advisors. In years to come, Truman would have to face questions over the merit of his actions. Although some may believe the atomic bomb was needed because it ended WWII, it was unnecessary to drop the nuclear bomb because of the alternatives that existed, the Read More effect it had on the Japanese people, and because of the unethical reasons for dropping it.… Why We Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq 1272 Words | 3 Pages Following Germany’s surrender to the Allied powers on May 7, 1945, Americans were hoping that Japan would surrender as well. However, after the Yalta Conference and promising the USSR many conditions if they helped America beat the Japanese, the Americans knew that they had to bring the Japanese to surrender before the Russians joined the war in two or three months. Then on July 16, 1945, the first atomic bomb, a weapon that could guarantee Japanese surrender, became a reality when it was tested in the New Mexico deserts successfully, was revealed publically to Russia and Britain at the Potsdam Conference, and was used publicly just one month later Read More on August 6 and 9 on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Although some would argue… Open Document https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Ronald-Takakis-Hiroshima-84454 9/14 12/30/23, 3:14 PM Ronald Takakis Hiroshima - 2111 Words | 123 Help Me depiction if it was necessary or not. To an extent, the use of these bombs was necessary to save many American lives, but it was not necessary when thinking just about vengeance for the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Walker also explains in the book, that there might have been other solutions in the war to bring it to an end, without the use Read More of these bombs, and provides substantial evidence supporting these “solutions.”… Justification Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Bombings 931 Words | 2 Pages The moral and military necessity of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings has been a subject of debate for almost half a century. Most revisionists emphasize the victimization of Japan during the attacks. They often forget the military realities and the historical context while judging whether it was necessary for America to use nuclear weapons against the two Japanese cities. It is important to note that Japan was the aggressor. Japan triggered the war that led to the bombing of its two cities with its sneak attack on America’s Pearl harbour in 1941. Subsequent systematic and flagrant violation of several international agreements and norms through employment of chemical and biological warfare and mistreatment of prisoners of war and civilians aggravated the situation[ Gar Alperovitz, The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb and the Architecture of an American Myth. (NY: Knopf, 1995), 89]. A response was needed to deal with increased aggression from Japan. Allied military planners had to choose between invading Japan and using the US atomic Open Document https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Ronald-Takakis-Hiroshima-84454 11/14 12/30/23, 3:14 PM Ronald Takakis Hiroshima - 2111 Words | 123 Help Me 941 Words | 2 Pages The Atomic Bombs 734 Words | 2 Pages Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan 684 Words | 2 Pages Atomic Bomb Morality 1771 Words | 4 Pages Ethical Decisions: The Bombing Of The Atomic Bomb 1978 Words | 4 Pages Why We Dropped The Atomic Bomb Dbq 1272 Words | 3 Pages The Atomic Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki 1721 Words | 4 Pages Argumentative Essay On The Atomic Bomb 901 Words | 2 Pages Justification Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki Bombings 931 Words | 2 Pages Was The Dropping Of The Atomic Bomb Justified? 2763 Words | 6 Pages Related Topics Bombings Open Document Presents https://www.123helpme.com/essay/Ronald-Takakis-Hiroshima-84454 13/14
