Lagrosas, Jorgie P. Constitutional Law 1 Notes (Book: PHILIPPINE POLITICAL LAW 2022 EDITION By: Isagani A. Cruz and Carlo L. Cruz) Prof: Atty. Curo Chapter 1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS - Scope of the study- is a study of structure and powers of the Government of the Philippines. - Necessity of the study- “sovereignty resides in the people and all government authority emanates from them”. o All educational institutions shall be included the study of the Constitution as part of the curricula - Basis of the Study- the 1987 Philippine Constitution, statutes, executive orders and decrees, judicial decisions, and provisions - Background of the Study TIMELINE Tribes- datu or council of elders Madjapahit and Sri-Vishayan empires (bounded by commercial ties) 1521- Magellan June 12, 1898- Philippine Independence January 21, 1899- First Philippine Republic December 10, 1989- Treaty of Paris Military Government Schurman Commission (1st Philippine Commission) Taft Commission (2nd Commission) July 4, 1901 (Civil government was established) 1902 (Philippine Bill) 1907 (Philippine Assembly) Jones law Tydings-McDuffie Act May 14, 1935 (1935 Constitution) November 15, 1935 (Commonwealth Government) 10-year transition period Japanese occupation (Second Republic of the Philippines) July 4, 1946 (the US formally withdraw) September 21, 1972 (Martial Law) January 17, 1973 (1973 Constitution) January 17, 1981 (lifting of Martial Law) 1985 (Marcos submitted a questionable resignation) February 7, 1986 (Snap Election) February 22, 1986 (People Power) February 25, 1986 (Corazon Aquino) Freedom Constitution 1987 Constitution May 11, 1988 (Local Elections) May 11, 1992 (General Election) Fidel RamosPresident; Joseph Estrada- VP 1998 (Joseph Estrada- President) January 20, 2001 (Erap- Impeached) Gloria Arroyo took oath Oakwood Mutiny 2004 (Arroyo’s 2nd term) Garci Tapes 2010 (Noynoy Aquino) 2016 (Rodrigo Duterte) Chapter 2 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE PHILIPPINES Commonwealth Constitution/ 1935 Constitution Constitution of 1973 Freedom Constitution 1987 Constitution o 18 Articles o Bicameral Congress o Presidential System o Independence of Judiciary has been strengthened o Commission on Human Rights o Bill of Rights of the Commonwealth Constitution Supremacy of the Constitution (Memorize) The Constitution is the basic and paramount law to which all other laws must conform and to which all persons, including the highest officials of the land, must defer. No act shall be valid, however noble its intentions, if it conflicts with the Constitution. The Constitution must ever remain supreme. All must bow to the mandate of its law. Expediency must not be allowed to sap its strength nor greed for power debase its rectitude. Right or wrong, the Constitution must be upheld as long as it has not been changed by the sovereign people lest its disregard result in the usurpation of the majesty of law by the pretenders to illegitimate power. Chapter 3 THE CONCEPT OF THE STATE Definition- The STATE is a community if persons, more or less numerous, permanently occupying a fixed territory, and possessed of an independent government organized for the political ends to which the great body of inhabitants render habitual obedience. State Legal concept “Melting pot” a state can be made up of more than one nation Nation Racial or ethnic concept May comprise of several state Elements: The Province of North Cotabato v. The Government of the Republic of the Philippines Peace Panel on Ancestral Domain 1. 2. 3. 4. PEOPLE (permanent population) TERRITORY (defined territory) GOVERNMENT SOVEREIGNTY (capacity to enter into relations with other states) *Two additional elements- recognition and possession of a sufficient degree of civilization. (1) PEOPLE - - Inhabitants of the State Must be numerous enough to be self-sufficing and to defend themselves and small enough to be easily administered and sustained. People must come from both sexes to be able to perpetuate themselves Share common language, religion, and set of customs and traditions that will unite them into a more closely-knit entity known as the nation. *People are more comprehensive and less cohesive than the nation. (2) TERRITORY Magallona v. Ermita, Arigo v. Swift - - - Fixed portion of the surface of the earth inhabited by the people of the State. Neither too big as to be difficult to administer and defend nor too small as to be unable to provide for the needs of the population. Components o Land mass/terrestrial domain o Inland and external waters/maritime and fluvial domain o Airspace above the land and waters/aerial domain Article I of the Constitution Archipelagic Doctrine- the entire archipelago as one integrated unit UNCLOS III- RA 9522 Territorial waters- 12 nautical miles Contiguous zone- 24 nautical miles Exclusive economic zone- 200 nautical miles Article 1 covers the ff territories: o Those coded to the United States by virtue of the Treaty of Paris of December 10, 1898 o Those defined in the treaty concluded between the United States and the Spain on November 7, 1900, which were not defined in the treaty of Paris, specifically the islands of Cagayan, Sulu and Shibuto. o Those defined in the treaty concluded on January 2, 1930, between the United States and the Great Britain, specifically the Turtle and Mangsee island. o The island of Batanes, which was covered under a general statement in the 1935 Constitution. o Those contemplated in the phrase “belonging to the Philippines by historic right or legal title” in the 1973 Constitution (3) GOVERNMENT - The agency or instrumentality through which the will of the state is formulated, expressed and realized. International law “no particular form of government is prescribed” Our constitution requires our government to be democratic and republican. Mandate of the government from the state is to promote the welfare of the people. Replacement of the government by revolution (A) Functions o Constituent Functions- constitutes the very bonds of society and are therefore compulsory. 1. Keeping of order and providing protection of persons and property 2. Fixing of the legal relations between husband and wife and between parents and children 3. The regulation of the holding, transmission and interchange of property, and the determination of its liabilities for debt or for crime 4. The determination of contractual rights between individuals 5. The definition and punishment of crimes 6. The administration of justice in civil cases 7. The administration of political duties, privileges and relations of citizens 8. The dealings of the state with foreign powers; the preservation of the State from external danger o Ministrant Functions(optional) those undertaken to advance the general interests of society such as; Public works Public charity Regulation of trade and industry Ministrant function distinguishes the paternalistic government from individualistic government (concerned only with maintaining peace and order) *The distinction between constituent and ministrant functions is not relevant in our jurisdiction. Ministrant function Constitution - that made compulsory by the Promote social justice Provide adequate social services Promote rising standard of living Protection to labor Formulate urban ang agrarian reform programs Adopt other measures intended to ensure the dignity, welfare and security of its citizens Establish and maintain a complete and adequate and fully integrated system of education To offer free elementary and secondary public education To promote scientific research and intervention To patronize arts and letters and develop Filipino culture for national identity - (E) Administration - - Important task of the government is to act for the State as parens patriae, or guardian of the rights of the people. Provider of protection to those unable to care for themselves. In fulfilling this duty, the State may resort to the exercise of its inherent powers: police power, eminent domain, and power of taxation (C) De Jure and De Facto Governments - De Jure- rightful title but no power or control. De Facto- a government of fact, it actually exercises power to control but without legal title 3 kinds of de facto government 1. By force or by the voice of the majority 2. Insurrection against the parent state (violent uprising) 3. Established and maintained by military force who invade and occupy a territory Characteristics of de facto government 1. Active military power 2. Obeyed in civil matters (D) Government of the Philippines - - The government is defined as “the corporate governmental entity through which the functions of government are exercised throughout the Philippines, including, save as the contrary appears from the context, the various arms through which political authority is made effective in the Philippines, whether pertaining to the autonomous regions, the provincial, city, municipality or barangay subdivisions or other form of local government.” A government-owned or controlled corporation engaged in proprietary functions cannot be considered part of the Government for purposes of exemption from the application of the statute of limitation. Group of persons in whose hands the reins of government are for the time being Administration runs the government Example: Aquino Administration *Administration is transitional whereas the government is permanent. (4) SOVEREIGNTY - (B) Doctrine of Parens Patriae (Parent of the Country) - A Government Agency refers to any various units of the government, including department, bureau, office, instrumentality or GovernmentOwned and Controlled Corporations (GOCC), or a local government. - - the supreme and uncontrollable power inherent in a State according to Supreme Court, it is the possession of sovereign power jurisdiction – authority to apply the law 2 kinds of Sovereignty a. Legal- power to issue final command b. Political- power behind legal the legal sovereign Internal Sovereignty- refers to the power of the State to control its domestic affairs. External Sovereignty- refers to the power to direct its relations with other States. Jus postliminium- The right by which person and thigs taken in war are restored to their former status when coming again under the power of the nation to which they belonged. Act of State- State prevent their national courts from deciding disputes which relate to the internal affairs of another state. *The power to deport aliens is an act of state Chapter 4 THE DOCTRINE OF STATE IMMUNITY “The State may not be sued without its consent” One of the generally accepted principles of international law that we accepted as part of the law of our land under Article 2 Section 2 of our Constitution. Basis - - Indiscriminate suit against the State will result in the impairment of its dignity Sovereign equality of the States par in parem non habet imperium – equals have no sovereignty over each other Exceptions: a. If the engage state in contracts which are purely commercial, private and proprietary act Jus imperii- public acts Jus gestonis- (commercial transactions) the state descends into the level of private individual, thus not immune *Not all acts jus imperii may exempt a State from suit in case of its exercise of its power of eminent domain, when done without payment of just compensation - Incorporated- has a charter of its own which has separate juridical personality. (ex. UP, SSS, the City of Manila) a. Test of suability is found in its charter b. (General Rule) it is suable if the charter says so, and this is true regardless of the function it is performing. GTZ v. CA Application - - Actions are rarely constituted directly against the Republic of the Philippines. The Usual practice is to file such claims nit against the State but against the officer of the government who has the responsibility. Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA)- has the authority to make a determination of immunity from suit. Exemption from Legal Requirements - State is not required to put up a bond for damages, or an appeal bond since it is assumed that it is always solvent (financially sound). The State is not entitled to pay the legal fees prescribed in the Rules of Court or the cost of the suit. Statutes of limitation do not run against the State unless provided by law. - UP V. DIZON Waiver of Immunity - The State may be sued if it gives its consent Forms of Consent - Express- manifested through general law or special law (ex. VFA treaty) Implied- when the State itself commences litigation or when it enters into a contract. - Suability vs. Liability - The mere fact that the State is suable does not mean that it is liable. The waiver of immunity by the State does not mean concession of its liability. - Suability Result of the expressed or implied consent In money claims referred first to the Commission on Audit (COA) The COA had exclusive jurisdiction to decide on the allowance or disallowance of money claims arising from the implementation of Republic Act No. 6758 Liability Is determined after hearing on the basis of relevant laws and the established facts Chapter 5 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND STATE POLICIES The function and public services rendered by the State cannot be allowed to be paralyzed or disrupted by the diversion of public fund from their legitimate and specific objects, as appropriated by law. Principle- comprehensive and fundamental rule Properties of government instrumentalities are of public dominion and are thus outside the commerce of men. They are not subject to levy, encumbrance or disposition through public or private sale since they are intended for public use. This is necessary because essential public services will stop if properties of public dominion are subject to encumbrances, foreclosure, and auction sale. Preamble *The doctrine of governmental immunity from suit cannot serve as an instrument for perpetrating an injustice on a citizen. Suits Against Government Agencies - Not incorporated- (General Rule) it possesses no juridical personality of its own since it unincorporated, the suit is against the agency’s principal, THE STATE. It is merge in the general machinery of the government (ex. DOJ, Bureau of Mines) a. NO CHARTER TO CONSULT b. (Exemption) suable if they are proprietary and not suable if they are governmental. Policy- a program, a definite course of method of action, pursued to implement it. - - first person, deepen sense of involvement and participation enumerates the primary aim and expresses the aspiration of the framers in drafting the Constitution rather wordy Republicanism Villavicencio v. Lukban - not only republican but also democratic democracy- government by the people republic- representative government a. officials are sworn to serve “a government of laws and not of men” The Defense of the State - - Section 4 The State, may take up all necessary action, including the use of armed force, to repel any threat to its security The duty to defend the State is imposed upon all citizens Peace and Order - Section 5 Implicit in a welfare state The Incorporation Clause - - - - Section 2 Doctrine of Incorporation a. By the reason of the State’s membership in the family of nations, bound by the generally accepted principles of international law, which are considered to be automatically part of its own laws. International law can be part of the sphere of domestic law either by transformation or incorporation. Transformation- requires that an international law be transformed into domestic law through a constitutional mechanism such as local legislation. (ex. Treaties) Incorporation- international law is deemed to have a force of domestic law by mere constitutional declaration Economy - Miscellaneous - Section 12, Section 13 Role of parents in the development of their children Doctrine of Separation - - Section 14 RA 9262 RA 9710 Magna Carta for Women Social Justice - - Section 6 Inviolable ‘Strong fences make good neighbors’ Based on mutual respect State cannot favor one religion and discriminate another and Church cannot demand the nation or citizenry to follow its beliefs A union of Church and State “tends to destroy government and to degrade religion” Supremacy of Civilian Authority - Section 3 President who is also a civilian official shall be commander-in-chief of all the armed forces of the Philippines. Local Autonomy - - Municipal corporations are small republics from which the greater one derives its strength Deepen sense of involvement Autonomy granted to the local government is not to be understood as independence. Was modified under 1973 Constitution (Marcos Admin 1) with the establishment of a semiparliamentary government that made the legislative subordinate in many aspects to the President, who was even vested with the ultimate power of dissolving it. The traditional concept of the doctrine was restored under the new Constitution but with several significant modifications Lessening the powers of the executive and corresponding increase in the authority of the legislature, inspired presumably by the experiences under the Marcos authoritarianism Purposes - Section 9, 10, 11, 18, and 21 Imbalance between the rich and the poor Separation of Church and State - - - Women Section 15, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, and 28 To accommodate particular authors and gratify their desires for expression and perpetuation of their ideas Chapter 6 SEPARATION OF POWERS Rearing of the Youth - Section 19 and 20 Development of economy effectively controlled by Filipinos Foreign Investment Act of 1991- a law regulation foreign investments I the Philippines - - - To prevent a concentration of authority in one person or group that might lead to an irreversible error or abuse According to Justice Laurel, the doctrine is intended to secure action, to forestall overaction, to prevent despotism and to obtain efficiency. The three branches of the government ha exclusive cognizance of and is supreme in matters falling within its own constitutionally allocated sphere Legislature- limited to the enactment of laws may not enforce or apply them Executive- limited to the enforcement of laws, may not enact or apply them Judiciary- limited to the application of laws, may not enforce or enact them Blending of Powers - Powers assigned to or shared by several departments It is often necessary for certain powers to be reposed in more than one department, so that they may better collaborate with and, in the process, check each other for the public good. Ex. General appropriations law Check and Balances - - The doctrine of separation of power is workable because of the system of check and balances One department is allowed to resist encroachment upon its prerogatives or to rectify mistakes or excesses committed by the other departments (ex. Veto power of the President; the Congress may limit the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the inferior courts; and the Judiciary has the power to declare invalid an act done by the congress, the president and his subordinates or the Constitutional Commission) - Political Questions Under the New Constitution - - The Judiciary sees to it that the constitutional distribution of powers among the several departments of the government is respected and observed, but this does not mean that it is superior to the other departments. Upholding the Supremacy of the Constitution Principle of non-delegation of powers - Justiciable and Political Questions - A political question is a legal term of art that refers to a type of legal question that is considered to be non-justiciable, meaning that it is not appropriate for a court to decide. Political questions are typically questions that are entrusted to another branch of government, such as the legislature or the executive branch, or that are beyond the competence of the judiciary to resolve. Some examples of political questions include: a. The recognition of foreign governments. b. The decision to go to war. c. The impeachment and removal of a president. - A justiciable question, on the other hand, is a legal question that is appropriate for a court to decide. Justiciable questions are typically questions that are susceptible to judicial resolution and that involve a concrete dispute between two or more parties with adverse interests. Some examples of justiciable questions include: a. Whether a law violates the Constitution. b. Whether a contract has been breached. c. Whether a person has committed a crime. Application of the Doctrine - Writ of mandamus could not be issued against the chief executive to compel him Doctrine of primary jurisdiction that the courts will defer to the decisions of the administrative offices and agencies by reason It is wrong to state that matters of foreign relations are political questions, and thus, beyond the judiciary’s reach. The Constitution expressly states that this Court, through its power of judicial review, may declare any treaty or international agreement unconstitutional. Chapter 7 DELEGATION OF POWERS The Role of the Judiciary - of their expertise and experience in the matters assigned to them. Powers that belong to the judiciary may not be assumed by other departments. - - - Potestas delegata non delegari potest- what has been delegated cannot be delegated Based upon the ethical principle that such delegated power constitutes not only a right but a duty to be performed by the delegate through the instrumentality of his own judgement and not through the intervening mind of another. A further delegation of such power, unless permitted by the sovereign power, would constitute a negation of this duty in violation of the trust reposed in the delegate mandate to discharge it directly. Applicable to all three major powers of the government but especially important in the case of the legislative. The legislature cannot be expected to reasonably comprehend all of the problems that the society is facing. This is because legislators are not experts in all of the fields, and they often do not have the time or resources to fully understand these issues. Permissible Delegation Delegation of legislative powers is permitted in the following cases: (1) Delegation of Tariff powers to the PresidentThe president is granted a stand-by or flexible power in the Tariff and Customs Code for a reason that legislative process is too much cumbersome. For the speedy solution of some economic problems, especially those relating to foreign trade, it is a necessity to give the chief executive the authority to act immediately on certain matters affecting the national economy. (2) Delegation of Emergency powers to the President- when there is an emergency problem must be solved within the shortest possible time for it not to worsen therefore legislative quorum may delay the process of solving the problem. When emergency powers are delegated to the president, he becomes in effect a - constitutional dictator. But there is no total abdication of legislative authority. The president is subject to certain restrictions and requirements intended to make him only an agent rather that a replacement of the legislature. Conditions: a. There must be a war or other national emergency b. The delegation must be for a limited period only c. The delegation must be subject to such restrictions as the Congress may prescribe. d. The emergency power must be exercised to carry out a national policy declared by the Congress - The terms "referendum" and "plebiscite" are sometimes used interchangeably. However, there is a subtle difference between the two terms. A plebiscite is typically used to decide on a specific issue of sovereignty or territorial status, while a referendum can be used to decide on a wider range of issues. - Referendums and plebiscites can be important tools for democracy. They can allow the people to have a direct say on important issues and to hold their government accountable. However, it is important to note that referendums and plebiscites are not without their risks. For example, they can be used to manipulate public opinion or to push through unpopular policies. - the emergency power will automatically cease upon the end of the emergency that justified their delegation. - Overall, referendums and plebiscites are powerful tools that can be used to strengthen democracy. However, it is important to use them carefully and to be aware of the potential risks. - National emergency may include: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Rebellion Economic Crisis Pestilence or Epidemic Typhoon Flood or other similar catastrophe *There cannot be any delegation of emergency powers in the absence of emergency. - Conferment of emergency power on the President is not mandatory on the Congress. - The Congress may choose to hold on to its legislative powers and validly refuse to delegate it. - emergency itself cannot and should not create powerChief Justice Paras (3) Delegation to the People- the people have voluntary surrendered that power when they adopted the Constitution. a. A referendum is a direct vote in which an entire electorate is asked to either accept or reject a particular proposal. Referendums can be used to decide on a wide range of issues, such as constitutional amendments, changes to public policy, or the ratification of treaties. b. A plebiscite is a type of referendum that is typically used to decide on issues of sovereignty or territorial status. For example, a plebiscite might be used to ask voters whether they want their country to become independent, or whether they want a particular region to secede from their country. (4) Delegation to the Local Governments This traditional exception is based on the recognition that local legislatures are more knowledgeable than the national lawmaking body on matters of purely local concern and are therefore in a better position to enact the necessary and appropriate legislation. Cardinal principle- local affairs shall be managed by local authorities and general affairs by the central authority. It is not a transfer of power but grant of the authority (5) Delegation to Administrative Bodies Delegation to administrative bodies is the transfer of lawmaking power from the legislature to an executive agency. This is done through the enactment of statutes that authorize the agency to make rules and regulations on a particular topic. There are a number of reasons why legislatures delegate lawmaking power to administrative bodies. One reason is that administrative bodies often have expertise in a particular area that the legislature does not. For example, the Environmental Protection Agency has expertise in environmental science, and the Food and Drug Administration has expertise in food safety. Another reason why legislatures delegate lawmaking power is that it can be more efficient than having the legislature make all of the laws itself. This is because administrative bodies can act more quickly than the legislature, and they can also be more responsive to changing circumstances. Administrative issuance may be classified into two: a. Legislative rule- implement a primary legislation b. - Administrative ruleto provide guidelines to the law which the administrative agency is in charge of enforcing Quasi-juridical power requires the concurrence of two elements: a. Jurisdiction- it is the power to hear and determine questions of fact to which legislative policy is to apply b. Due process- to decide in accordance with the standard laid down by the law itself in enforcing and administering the same law Test of Delegation Assuming that the delegation of legislative power comes under any of the permissible exceptions, there is still the question whether or not the delegation has been validly made. (1) The Completeness Test- this means that the legislature must specify the limits of the administrative body’s authority and policies that it is meant to implement. (2) The Sufficient Standard Test- this means that the legislature must have the ability to overturn or amend the administrative body’s rules and regulations If the legislature meets both of these requirements, then the delegation of lawmaking power is considered to be valid. However, if the legislature fails to meet either of these requirements, then the delegation of lawmaking power is considered to be invalid. The test of delegation is important because it helps to ensure that the legislature does not abdicate its lawmaking power to the executive branch. It also helps to ensure that the administrative branch is accountable to the legislature. The Palaez Case The Palaez Case (G.R. No. L-23825) is a landmark case in Philippine constitutional law that established the principle that the President of the Philippines does not have the power to create municipalities without the concurrence (agreement) of Congress. The case arose in 1964 when then-Vice President Emmanuel Pelaez filed a petition for prohibition with preliminary injunction against the Auditor General to restrain him from passing in audit any expenditure of public funds in implementation of executive orders issued by President Diosdado Macapagal creating 33 municipalities. Pelaez argued that the President's power to create municipalities under Section 68 of the Revised Administrative Code had been impliedly repealed by Republic Act No. 2264, which vested the power to create municipalities in the Congress. The Supreme Court agreed with Pelaez and ruled that the President does not have the power to create municipalities without the concurrence of Congress. The Court held that Section 68 of the Revised Administrative Code had been impliedly repealed by Republic Act No. 2264, which is a later and more specific law. The Court also held that the power to create municipalities is a legislative power, and the President cannot exercise legislative powers unless expressly authorized by the Constitution. The Palaez Case is a significant case because it established the principle that the President of the Philippines does not have unlimited power. The President's power is limited by the Constitution and by laws enacted by Congress. The Palaez Case also helped to clarify the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches of government. The Palaez Case has been cited in many subsequent cases, and it remains a leading authority on the President's power to create municipalities. The case is also an important precedent for the principle of limited government and the separation of powers. In addition to the legal significance of the Palaez Case, it also has important political implications. The case helped to strengthen the power of Congress relative to the President. It also helped to establish the principle that the President is not above the law. Chapter 8 THE LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT The Senate (1) Composition (2) Qualifications (3) Term The House of Representatives (1) Composition a. The District Representatives b. The Party-list Representatives (2) Qualifications Election Salaries Parliamentary Immunities (1) Privilege from Arrest (2) Privilege of Speech and Debate Conflict of Interest Incompatible and Forbidden Offices Inhibitions and Disqualifications Session Offices Quorum Discipline of Members Journals Adjournment Electoral Tribunals Commission on Appointments Organization