MAE 3420 HW 10 Nathan Jones Distance Traveled by Droplets/Aerosol Released During Human Expiratory Events (1) Estimate the Reynolds number of jet coming out during breathing, coughing, and sneezing. Which of these flows are laminar and which of them are turbulent? (10 points) For all calculations, I used values at 25 °C: • ππππ = 1.849 × 10−5 m2 /s kg • ππππ = 1.184 m3 Since Re is having its dynamic viscosity defined by the subscript ‘p’ (meaning particle, not air, since ‘air’ is already defined as a subscript), I assume that the kinematic viscosity should also for water (ππ = 0.891 × 10−6 m2 /s). I wished the variables were more explicitly defined so I did not have to make assumptions. Assuming that breathing has the smallest particle size of 0.5 μm: π ππππππ‘β π’π· (1.5 m/s)(0.5 × 10−6 m) = = = 0.84175 ππ 0.891 × 10−6 m2 /s Assuming that coughing has the median particle size of 8 μm: • Average speed is (1.5 + 30)/2 = 15.75 m/s π ππππ’πβ = π’π· (15.75 m/s)(8 × 10−6 m) = = 141.414 ππ 0.891 × 10−6 m2 /s Assuming that sneezing has the largest particle size of 256 μm: • Average speed is (20 + 50)/2 = 37.5 m/s π ππ ππππ§π = π’π· (37.5 m/s)(256 × 10−6 m) = = 10056 ππ 0.891 × 10−6 m2 /s Considering that flow is laminar when π π < 2300: • Breathing and coughing are laminar. • Sneezing is turbulent. 1 (2) Calculate the particle Reynolds number for the given aerosol sizes and expiration velocities. What is the maximum velocity of release for each aerosol/droplet size, that allows the aerosol to be in the creeping (Stokes) flow regime? Recall that for practical purposes, creeping flow is at πΉππ ≈ π. (10 points) π ππ = ππ π’π· ≈1→π’= ππ π· For given particle size: • π· = 0.5 μm: π’ = 1.782 m/s • π· = 1 μm: π’ = 0.891 m/s • π· = 2 μm: π’ =0.4455 m/s • π· = 4 μm: π’ = 0.2228 m/s • π· = 8 μm: π’ = 0.1114 m/s • π· = 16 μm: π’ = 0.0557 m/s • π· = 32 μm: π’ = 0.0278 m/s • π· = 64 μm: π’ = 0.0139 m/s • π· = 128 μm: π’ = 0.0070 m/s • π· = 256 μm: π’ = 0.0035 m/s 2 (3) What is the distance traveled by aerosols of different sizes before hitting the floor, when they are released during different expiratory events from a height of an average human being (you can use your own height for the calculations)? Also, calculate the time that aerosols of different sizes take to reach the floor. (60 points) The aerosols once released will travel in the horizontal and the vertical direction. If we assume that the direction of the expiration is parallel to the floor, then the horizontal motion of the aerosols will be propelled by an initial velocity it attains from the jet. The aerosols will then be slowed down due to drag on them. Drag on the aerosol will depend on the regime they are in. If they are in the Stokes/Creeping flow regime, the horizontal drag on the aerosol will be defined by ππ = ππ ππππ π«π. Where D is diameter of the aerosol, u is velocity of the aerosol, and ππ is the drag force on the aerosol. In the vertical direction, the aerosol will accelerate towards the floor due to gravity. Whereas buoyancy and drag in the vertical direction will slow down the vertical motion of the aerosols. Though, in case the direction of expiration is not parallel to the floor, then the motion of the aerosols will be altered according to the direction of their initial velocity. On a given particle for parallel expiration ∑ πΉπ₯ = −3πππππ π·π’π₯ ∑ πΉπ¦ = −3πππππ π·π’π¦ + ππππ π 3 π π· π − ππ π·3 π 6 6 From the sum of the forces, the acceleration in x and y can be determined by dividing by the mass of the particle: π ππ = ππ π·3 6 ∑ πΉπ₯ → ππ₯ = ∑ πΉπ¦ → ππ¦ = −3πππππ π·π’π₯ −18ππππ π’π₯ = π ππ π·2 ππ 6 π·3 1 π 3 π 3 π 3 (−3πππππ π·π’π¦ + ππππ 6 π· π − ππ 6 π· π) ππ 6 π· Used values: • Average height of a man: 5 foot 9 inches or 1.7526 m (from CDC) • π = 9.81 m/π 2 (in negative y direction) NOTE: When attempting to plot the sizes of below 64 μm, the small sizes resulted in overflow errors and caused that portion to not function (Specifically, the mass of the particles were very small, causing their respective accelerations to be incredibly large). Because of this, only sizes 64 μm and above were plotted. 3 Time, distance (for 1.5 m/s, coughing): • π· = 64 μm: 14.547 s, 0.0185 m • π· = 128 μm: 3.684 s, 0.0738 m • π· = 256 μm: 1.106 s, 0.2943 m 4 Time, distance (for 15.75 m/s, coughing): • π· = 64 μm: 14.547 s, 0.1938 m • π· = 128 μm: 3.684 s, 0.7753 m • π· = 256 μm: 1.106 s, 3.0901 m 5 Time, distance (for 37.5 m/s, coughing): • π· = 64 μm: 14.547 s, 0.4615 m • π· = 128 μm: 3.684 s, 1.8460 m • π· = 256 μm: 1.106 s, 7.357 m 6 (4) Determine the angle with respect to the horizontal at which if the expiration occurs, will result in the aerosols/droplets traveling the longest distance? (20 points) NOTE: When attempting to plot the sizes of 64 μm, the small sizes resulted in overflow errors and caused that portion to not function (Specifically, the mass of the particles were very small, causing their respective accelerations to be incredibly large). Because of this, only sizes 64 μm and above were plotted. By iterating through angles from 0 to 90 degrees, this angle can be found: • For 64 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.0185 m) o 15.75 m/s: 0 degrees (0.1938 m) o 37.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.4615 m) • For 128 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.07384 m) o 15.75 m/s: 0 degrees (0.7753 m) o 37.5 m/s: 0 degrees (1.8460 m) • For 256 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.2943 m) o 15.75 m/s: 1.41 degrees (3.0912 m) o 37.5 m/s: 2.03 degrees (7.3661 m) 7 (5) If the moving aerosols are not in the Stokes/Creeping flow regime, then the drag on the π aerosol is defined by ππ = π πͺπ« ππππ π¨ππ , where πͺπ« is the drag coefficient; π¨ = π π«π /π, the ππ frontal area of the aerosol; u is the velocity of the particle. πͺπ« is estimated as πͺπ« = πΉπ + π π. π where the particle Reynolds number πΉππ = ππ« π = ππ ππ« π . In the Stokes/Creeping flow regime, πΉππ < π, and the second term in the πͺπ« relationship becomes negligible compared to ππ/πΉππ. This makes the drag on the aerosol similar to the drag calculated using the formula in the previous section. Ideally, when the transport of the aerosol particles is calculated, it is more accurate to use the drag formula that works across different regimes, that are Stokes and laminar/turbulent. How do your answers for part 3 and part 4 change if you use the more accurate formula for calculating drag. (100 points) On a given particle for parallel expiration 1 ∑ πΉπ₯ = ± πΆπ· ππππ π΄π’π₯ 2 2 1 π π ∑ πΉπ¦ = ± πΆπ· ππππ π΄π’π¦ 2 + ππππ π·3 π − ππ π·3 π 2 6 6 • The sign on the drag force (±) should be opposite of the sign of the given velocity From the sum of the forces, the acceleration in x and y can be determined by dividing by the mass of the particle: π ππ = ππ π·3 6 1 ± 2 πΆπ· ππππ π΄π’π₯ 2 ±3πΆπ· ππππ π΄π’π₯ 2 ∑ πΉπ₯ → ππ₯ = = π ππ ππ·2 ππ 6 π·3 ∑ πΉπ¦ → ππ¦ = 1 1 π 3 π 3 2 π 3 (± 2 πΆπ· ππππ π΄π’π¦ + ππππ 6 π· π − ππ 6 π· π) ππ 6 π· Used values: • Average height of a man: 5 foot 9 inches or 1.7526 m (from CDC) • π = 9.81 m/π 2 (in negative y direction) NOTE: When attempting to plot the sizes of below 16 μm, the small sizes resulted in overflow errors and caused that portion to not function (Specifically, the mass of the particles were very small, causing their respective accelerations to be incredibly large). Because of this, only sizes 64 μm and above were plotted. 8 Time, distance (for 1.5 m/s, breathing): • π· = 16 μm: 15.0055 s, 0.0212 m • π· = 32 μm: 5.6506 s, 0.0756 m • π· = 64 μm: 3.0423 s, 0.1747 m • π· = 128 μm: 1.9782 s, 0.3075 m • π· = 256 μm: 1.4001 s, 0.4639 m 9 Time, distance (for 15.75 m/s, coughing): • π· = 16 μm: 15.0055 s, 0.0446 m • π· = 32 μm: 5.6506 s, 0.1271 m • π· = 64 μm: 3.0423 s, 0.2825m • π· = 128 μm: 1.9782 s, 0.5261 m • π· = 256 μm: 1.4001 s, 0.8965 m 10 Time, distance (for 37.5 m/s, sneezing): • π· = 16 μm: 15.0055 s, 0.0547 m • π· = 32 μm: 5.6506 s, 0.1476 m • π· = 64 μm: 3.0423 s, 0.3238 m • π· = 128 μm: 1.9782 s, 0.6090 m • π· = 256 μm: 1.4001 s, 1.0619 m 11 Finding new angles: NOTE: When attempting to plot the sizes of below 16 μm, the small sizes resulted in overflow errors and caused that portion to not function (Specifically, the mass of the particles were very small, causing their respective accelerations to be incredibly large). Because of this, only sizes 64 μm and above were plotted. By iterating through angles from 0 to 90 degrees, this angle can be found: • For 16 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.0212 m) o 15.75 m/s: 14.97 degrees (0.0449 m) o 37.5 m/s: 12.74 degrees (0.0554 m) • For 32 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.0756 m) o 15.75 m/s: 0 degrees (0.1271 m) o 37.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.1476 m) • For 64 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.1747m) o 15.75 m/s: 0 degrees (0.2825m) o 37.5 m/s: 0 degrees (0.3238 m) • For 128 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 1.26 degrees (0.3075 m) o 15.75 m/s: 12.44 degrees (0.5315 m) o 37.5 m/s: 12.52 degrees (0.6185 m) • For 256 μm: o 1.5 m/s: 5.64 degrees (0.4647 m) o 15.75 m/s: 16.75 degrees (0.9278 m) o 37.5 m/s: 15.97 degrees (1.108 m) Compared to previous answers: • The graphs exhibited a steeper descent for the particles, meaning that drag less of an effect on the particles, speeding up their acceleration. • The angle which produces the maximum distance for a given size and speed also increased. Here are some examples of the plots generated during the solving of angles: 12 13