Uploaded by Ashley Rose

Research Manuscript AR

advertisement
Examining the effect of socioeconomic status on the prevalence of breast cancer screening in
2022 for women 40 years and older in Georgia using BRFSS data.
Ashley Rose, MPH Candidate
Abstract
Objectives. To examine the effects of socioeconomic status as it relates to age, education level, income
level and race/ethnicity on women 40 years and older in Georgia on the prevalence of breast cancer
screening in 2022.
Methods. We performed a descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression of breast cancer
screening likelihoods based on the various socioeconomic factors (age, education level, income level and
race) for the year 2022 in Georgia based on data obtained from the BRFSS (Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System) survey.
Results. Women in age groups 60-64 and 65+ were more likely to have obtained a mammogram in the
last two years than women ages 40-49 and 50-59. More white, non-Hispanic women obtained a
mammogram than black and Hispanic women. Women whose highest level of education was
College/University were more likely to have obtained a mammogram than those who’s highest education
level was high school and those that did not graduate from high school. Women whose household income
was greater than $50,000 annually were more likely to have had a mammogram than those who’s
household income was less $50,000.
Conclusions. Socioeconomic factors affect women’s ability to obtain breast cancer screenings. Women
that are older, have higher household income and who’s highest level of education is a college degree are
more likely to obtain breast cancer screenings. More research needs to be done to identify how these
barriers effect women’s ability to obtain these screenings and in turn effect the rate of breast cancer
diagnosis in women that experience socioeconomic barriers.
Introduction
The Centers for Disease Control conducts the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Survey annually. The purpose of the survey is to collect data on a state-to-state basis of
Americans use of preventive services, health related risk behaviors and chronic health
conditions. (CDC - BRFSS, 2023) In particular, the 2022 survey was used to obtain data about
women 40 years and older’s breast cancer screening practices. Breast cancer screening through
the use of mammograms has been proven to reduce breast cancer mortality. However, there are
significant gaps in screening access among women that are in minority populations (Alcaraz et
al., 2019) and low socioeconomic status even though those in these groups are at highest risk of
being diagnosed with breast cancer. (Monticciolo, 2020) In this article, the gaps in the
prevalence of breast cancer screening among women 40 years and older, of varying
socioeconomic status in Georgia will be assessed.
Methods
Age adjusted prevalence rates of breast cancer screenings were examined as well as crude
prevalence of breast cancer screening based on household income, race/ethnicity, education
level. Data was extracted from the BRFSS 2022 Survey data and documentation page on the
CDC website. The 2022 data contained responses to the question “Have you received a
mammogram in the last two years” so comparison between previous two years was not done.
The data file was converted from XPT format and imported into SAS 9.4 for data analysis. Each
variable was age adjusted. Socioeconomic status has a multitude of definitions, in this case the
focus was on race/ethnicity. Education, and income level. Race/ethnicity was defined as White,
non-Hispanic, Black non-Hispanic and Hispanic. P values were calculated using chi squares
tests.
Results
Age Adjusted Odds ratios were estimated for the based on the BRFSS survey data for 2022.
Odds ratios for Age group were produced by comparing the likelihood of each age group to have
obtained a mammogram to age group 40-49. Based on this, women 65+ (1.74 AOR) were more
likely to have had a mammogram. White, non-Hispanic women were more likely than Hispanic
women to obtain a mammogram (AOR 1.26 vs 0.671 respectively). Black women were more
likely to have obtained a mammogram than both white and Hispanic women. Women whose
highest level of education is a college degree is more likely to obtain a mammogram than those
with less than a high school diploma and those with a high school diploma. Women whose
annual household income was over $100,000 were more likely to obtain a mammogram than
those whose income was $15,0000-$24,999 (AOR 2.74 vs 1.3). The p.value yielded for each
category was less than the level of significance indicating that the likelihood of women over the
age of 40 in Georgia obtaining a mammogram varies based on socioeconomic status.
Table 1.
Age Adjusted Prevalence and Odds Ratios for Breast Cancer Screening Rates Based on
Socioeconomic Status defined by income level, education level and race/ethnicity.
Have you obtained a mammogram in the last two years?
Age Adjusted Prevalence
95% C.I.
Age Adjusted Odds
Ratio(C.I.)
Yes (n(%))
No (n(%)
AOR (CI)
40-49
338(60.6)
184(39.4)
0.67(0.36,1.26)
50-59
510(71.9)
199(28.1)
1.45(1.06,1.99)
60-64
355(79.3)
105(20.8)
1.65(1.15,2.37)
65+
1449(74.9)
494(25.1)
1.74(1.232,2.45)
Race/Ethnicity
White, non
Hispanic
Black, non
Hipsanic
1761(69.8)
720(30.2)
1.26(1.03,1.56)
745(76.9)
186(23.1)
1.84(0.41,8.26)
Age Group
Hispanic
71(66.4)
33(33.6)
0.671(0.359,1.26)
156(56.1)
108(43.9)
1.00(0.724,1.43)
626(68.6)
239(31.4)
1.33(0.94,1.87)
1116(78.4)
332(21.6)
1.9(1.35,2.68)
257(60.4%)
159(39%)
1.3(0.74,2.36)
259(63.7)
108(36.3)
0.74(0.44,1.26)
35,000-49,999
293(67.4)
102(32.6)
0.965(0.58,1.60)
50,000-99,999
100,000199,999
613(73.2)
198(26.8)
1.65(1.01,2.69)
369(79.2)
90(20.8)
2.74(1.57,4.79)
Education
Level
Less than
Highschool
High School
diploma
College
Degree
Household
Income
15,00024,9999
25,000034,999
Discussion
Overall, the prevalence of breast cancer screening through mammography is higher among those
that would be of higher socioeconomic status. Of note, women of Hispanic descent, women with
less than a high school diploma and women whose income is less than $50,000 per year are far
less likely to obtain a mammogram. A higher prevalence of screening was seen in Black nonHispanic women than in white women, a noteworthy change that can be attributed to successful
intervention strategies such a local campaign geared towards minority women like the National
Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. (Li et al., 2020) Although white women
have a higher incidence of breast cancer, black women experience higher rates of breast cancer
mortality, thus why they are programs tailored for targeted education, outreach and preventive
screening services. (Breast Cancer Facts & Figures, n.d.)
This study has limitations as factors such as health insurance, type of coverage, recommendation
guidelines, transportation access and specific geographic factors were not included in the
analysis. (Castaldi et al., 2022) All factors that could be considered under the scope of
socioeconomic status can potentially affect a woman’s level of accessibility to preventive
screenings. The survey data was also collected using a landline-based phone survey method
which means that respondents would be limited to women that have this kind of telephone in
their home. Nonetheless, this analysis displays a difference in breast cancer screening
prevalence across various socioeconomic factors which can lead to further research to detail why
this is, the impact it has on mortality rates and possible interventions that can be performed.
Public Health Implications.
More research to examine the impact of other factors such as recommendation guidelines should
be addressed. Age can introduce bias in these rates due to such guidelines. Adjustments to the
guidelines accordingly can potentially have an impact on the prevalence of preventive breast
cancer screenings as it relates to age. Interventions need to be developed with the thought of
systemic racial and cultural barriers in mind. Such data can be useful in informing policies and
surveillance methods for improvement in the uptake of preventive screenings among this
population. (Monticciolo et al., 2018)
References
Alcaraz, K. I., Wiedt, T. L., Daniels, E., Yabroff, K. R., Guerra, C. E., & Wender, R. C. (2019).
Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health equity in the
United States: A blueprint for practice, research, and policy. CA: A Cancer Journal for
Clinicians, 70(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21586
Breast cancer facts & figures. (n.d.). American Cancer Society.
https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-figures.html
Castaldi, M., Smiley, A., Kechejian, K., Butler, J., & Latifi, R. (2022). Disparate access to breast
cancer screening and treatment. BMC Women’s Health, 22(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01793-z
CDC - BRFSS. (n.d.). https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/index.html
Li, L., Ji, J., Besculides, M., Bickell, N. A., Margolies, L., Jandorf, L., Taioli, E., Mazumdar, M.,
& Liu, B. (2020). Factors associated with mammography use: A side‐by‐side comparison
of results from two national surveys. Cancer Medicine, 9(17), 6430–6451.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3128
Monticciolo, D. L. (2020). Current guidelines and gaps in breast cancer screening. Journal of the
American College of Radiology, 17(10), 1269–1275.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2020.05.002
Monticciolo, D. L., Newell, M. S., Moy, L., Niell, B. L., Monsees, B., & Sickles, E. A. (2018).
Breast cancer screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations
from the ACR. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 15(3), 408–414.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.034
Download