Uploaded by Lindelihle Nozigqwaba

Complex numbers 2023

advertisement
Complex numbers
Introduction
We started the study of number systems with the set of natural numbers β„•, and then the
number zero was included to form the system of whole numbers. Thereafter, negative
numbers were defined. This extended our number system to integers β„€. To solve the
problems of the type π‘žπ‘žπ‘žπ‘ž = 𝑝𝑝 we included rational numbers β„š in the system of integers.
The system of rational numbers was extended further to irrational numbers as all
lengths cannot be measured in terms of lengths expressed in rational numbers to solve
problems like π‘₯π‘₯ 2 = 2 (has no rational solutions but it has real solutions). The rational
and irrational numbers taken together are termed real numbers ℝ. These are numbers
that exist and can be represented on the number line, but the system of real numbers is
not sufficient to solve all algebraic equations. There are no real numbers which satisfy
the equation π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 1 = 0 as you might know (no solution). In order to solve such
equations, i.e., to find square roots of negative numbers, we need to extend the system
of real numbers to a new system of numbers known as complex numbers β„‚.
The equation π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 1 = 0 has no real solutions, because for any real number π‘₯π‘₯ the
square π‘₯π‘₯ 2 is non-negative, and so π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 1 can never be less than 1. In other words, we
can say that there is no real numbers whose square is −1. In order to solve
such equations, let us 𝑖𝑖magine that there exist a number 𝑖𝑖 which is equal to √−1
(√−1 = 𝑖𝑖). In 1748, a great mathematician, Leonard Euler named a number 𝑖𝑖 as 𝐼𝐼ota
whose square is −1. This Iota or 𝑖𝑖 is defined as an imaginary unit. With the introduction
of the new symbol 𝑖𝑖, we can interpret the square root of a negative number as a
product of a real number with 𝑖𝑖. Therefore, we can denote the solution of π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 1 = 0 as
π‘₯π‘₯ = ± √−1 = ±π‘–𝑖.
From high school in SA, using the discriminant, we identify the three different cases of
quadratic equations as follows:
1. Positive discriminant: 𝑏𝑏 − 4π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž > 0, two real roots, eg π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 3π‘₯π‘₯ + 2 = 0
2. Zero discriminant: 𝑏𝑏 − 4π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž = 0, one repeated real root, eg π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 4π‘₯π‘₯ + 4 = 0.
1
3. Negative discriminant: 𝑏𝑏 2 − 4π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž < 0, complex conjugate roots. π‘Žπ‘Ž − 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 and π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
are conjugate pairs.
It very useful to assume that there is a number 𝑖𝑖 for which one has 𝑖𝑖 2 = −1. Any
complex number is then an expression of the form π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏, where π‘Žπ‘Ž and 𝑏𝑏 are real
2
2
numbers. For example, 2 = +2 = = οΏ½√2οΏ½ = 2 + 0𝑖𝑖 and 2𝑖𝑖 = 0 + 2𝑖𝑖. The number π‘Žπ‘Ž is
1
called the real part of π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏, and 𝑏𝑏 is called the imaginary part. Traditionally the letters 𝑧𝑧
and 𝑀𝑀 are used to stand for complex numbers. Since any complex number is specified
by two real numbers, one can visualise them by plotting a point with coordinates (π‘Žπ‘Ž, 𝑏𝑏)
in the plane for a complex number π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏. The plane in which one plot these complex
numbers is called the Complex plane, or Argand plane (named after Swiss
mathematician). NB: For real numbers, we have the Cartesian plane from Rene
Descartes who was French.
Some real polynomials, like 𝑧𝑧 2 = −9, cannot be factored completely into degree 1
real polynomials, but do factor into degree 1 complex polynomials:
(𝑧𝑧 + 3𝑖𝑖)(𝑧𝑧 − 3𝑖𝑖) = 0 where 𝑧𝑧 = ±√−9 = ±√9 × −1 = ±√9 × √−1 = 0 ± 3𝑖𝑖.
(for π‘₯π‘₯ 2 − 9 = 0; 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜ (π‘₯π‘₯ − 3)(π‘₯π‘₯ + 3) = 0 π‘‘π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘’π‘’π‘’ π‘₯π‘₯ = ±3 + 0𝑖𝑖) In fact, every complex
polynomial factors completely into degree 1 complex polynomials. This implies the
Fundamental theorem of algebra:
Every degree 𝑛𝑛 complex polynomial 𝑓𝑓(𝑧𝑧) has exactly 𝑛𝑛 complex roots, if counted
with multiplicity.
For real polynomials, the theorem sometimes does not hold eg, π‘₯π‘₯ 3 − 8 = 0. What is π‘₯π‘₯?
π‘₯π‘₯ = 2. But according to the theorem, we expect to hve THREE REAL ROOTS. For real
polynomials, the non-real roots can be paired off with their complex conjugates.
Complex conjugate root theorem states that if 𝑃𝑃 is a polynomial in one variable with
real coefficients, and π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 is a root of 𝑃𝑃 with π‘Žπ‘Ž and 𝑏𝑏 real numbers, then its complex
conjugate π‘Žπ‘Ž − 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 is also a root of 𝑃𝑃. 1 − 𝑖𝑖 also 1 + 𝑖𝑖 is a root. Also difference of two
squares: (π‘₯π‘₯ − 2)(π‘₯π‘₯ + 2) = π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 2π‘₯π‘₯ − 2π‘₯π‘₯ − 4 = π‘₯π‘₯ 2 − 4
2
The simplest explanation is that complex roots come in conjugate pairs (by the way this
is only true for real polynomials, not those with complex coefficients) is that these pairs
are needed to ensure we don’t get complex values for our coefficients/constants of our
polynomial when we multiply through. E.g. (π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)(π‘Žπ‘Ž − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖) = π‘Žπ‘Ž2 + π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž − π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž − 𝑖𝑖 2 𝑏𝑏 2 =
π‘Žπ‘Ž2 + 𝑏𝑏 2 .
It follows from this (and the fundamental theorem of algebra) that, if the degree of a real
polynomial is odd, it must have at least one real root.
This can be proved as follows.
•
Since non-real complex roots come in conjugate pairs, there are an even number
of them;
•
But a polynomial of odd degree has an odd number of roots;
•
Therefore, some of them must be real.
For example, π‘₯π‘₯ 3 − 8 = 0 has one real root (π‘₯π‘₯ = 2) and two complex roots to give a total
of three roots/solutions. Also π‘₯π‘₯ 3 + 8 = 0 has at least one real solution, which is π‘₯π‘₯ = −2.
The other two are non-real (complex).
Consider another quadratic equation:
By the quadratic formula, a=1; b=-6 and c=13
π‘₯π‘₯ =
−(−6) ± √36 − 52 6 ± √−16 6 ± √−1 × 16 6 ± 4√−1
=
=
=
= 3 + 2𝑖𝑖 π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ 3 − 2𝑖𝑖
2
2
2
2
3
It has TWO non-real (complex) roots shown above because it is even. But, if π‘Žπ‘Ž = 0 and
𝑏𝑏 ≠ 0, then the root becomes 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 which is a purely imaginary complex number, 2𝑖𝑖.
If π‘Žπ‘Ž ≠ 0 and 𝑏𝑏 = 0 then the root becomes π‘Žπ‘Ž which is a real number, 3. Hence the
real numbers are particular cases of complex numbers. ℝ ⊆ β„‚.
We know that the roots of π‘₯π‘₯ 2 − 6π‘₯π‘₯ + 25 = 0 are 3 ± 4𝑖𝑖. This can be written as 3 + 4𝑖𝑖 or
3 − 4𝑖𝑖. Can you show it?
The polynomial π‘₯π‘₯ 3 − 7π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 41π‘₯π‘₯ − 87 has roots 3, 2 + 5𝑖𝑖 , 2 − 5𝑖𝑖. Can you show it?
Thus can be factored as ( π‘₯π‘₯ − 3 ) ( π‘₯π‘₯ − 2 − 5 𝑖𝑖 ) ( π‘₯π‘₯ − 2 + 5 𝑖𝑖 ) .
In computing the product of the last two factors, the imaginary parts cancel, and we get
2
( π‘₯π‘₯ − 3 ) ( π‘₯π‘₯ 2 − 4 π‘₯π‘₯ + 29 ) . 5𝑖𝑖 × 5𝑖𝑖 = 25𝑖𝑖 2 = 25οΏ½√−1οΏ½ = 25(−1) = −25
Also, if 𝑧𝑧 = π‘Žπ‘Ž − 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏, then the complex conjugate is 𝑧𝑧̅ = π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏. Now 𝑧𝑧̿ = π‘Žπ‘Ž − 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏.
Verify it.
Moreover,
οΏ½οΏ½οΏ½οΏ½οΏ½οΏ½οΏ½οΏ½
EG 𝑀𝑀 = 2 + 2𝑖𝑖 π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž 𝑧𝑧 = 3 − 3𝑖𝑖 . Now 𝑀𝑀 + 𝑧𝑧 = 2 + 2𝑖𝑖 + 3 − 3𝑖𝑖 = 5 − 𝑖𝑖 π‘‘π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘’π‘’π‘’ 𝑀𝑀
+ 𝑧𝑧 = 5 + 𝑖𝑖
Also 𝑀𝑀
οΏ½ = 2 − 2𝑖𝑖 π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž 𝑧𝑧̅ = 3 + 3𝑖𝑖. 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑀𝑀
οΏ½ + 𝑧𝑧̅ = 5 + 𝑖𝑖
The first one just says that if we conjugate twice we get back to what we started with
originally and hopefully this makes some sense. The remaining three just say we can
break up sum, differences, products and quotients into the individual pieces and then
conjugate.
4
Properties of complex numbers
2
Also 𝑧𝑧𝑧𝑧̅ = |𝑧𝑧|2 = οΏ½√π‘Žπ‘Ž2 + 𝑏𝑏 2 οΏ½ = π‘Žπ‘Ž2 + 𝑏𝑏 2 shown below.
Task
1
1
1
𝑖𝑖
(iv) + 𝑖𝑖 then the conjugate is − .
2
2
2
2
Task
If 𝑧𝑧 = 2 + 3𝑖𝑖 and 𝑀𝑀 = 4 − 9𝑖𝑖, find 𝑧𝑧𝑧𝑧.
Division of complex numbers
5
(rationalising the denominator)
(a) 60-18i
(b) 60 + 78𝑖𝑖 + 24𝑖𝑖 2 = 36 + 76𝑖𝑖
(c)
(d)
5𝑖𝑖(1+7𝑖𝑖)
(1−7𝑖𝑖)(1+7𝑖𝑖)
=
5𝑖𝑖−35
1+49
=
−35+5𝑖𝑖
50
=−
7
10
+
1
10
6
𝑖𝑖.
Higher powers of 𝑖𝑖
We know that 𝑖𝑖 = √−1
Thus, we find that any higher powers of 𝑖𝑖 can be expressed in terms of one of four
values 𝑖𝑖, – 1, – 𝑖𝑖, 1.
Example
7
Example
Equal complex numbers
If two complex numbers are equal, then the real and imaginary parts are also equal.
We call this equating like parts.
Task
Solutions
1 − 6𝑖𝑖 − 9 − 5π‘₯π‘₯ − 5𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 = π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦
4
Comparing Real parts: 1 − 9 − 5π‘₯π‘₯ = π‘₯π‘₯ π‘‘π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘’π‘’π‘’ 8 = 6π‘₯π‘₯ which gives π‘₯π‘₯ = .
3
Imaginary parts (terms in 𝑖𝑖): −6𝑖𝑖 − 5𝑦𝑦𝑖𝑖 = 𝑦𝑦𝑖𝑖 π‘‘π‘‘β„Žπ‘’π‘’π‘’π‘’ − 6 = 6𝑦𝑦 π‘€π‘€β„Žπ‘–π‘–π‘–π‘–β„Ž 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔 𝑦𝑦 = −1.
Task 2
Task
where 𝑧𝑧 = π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦.
8
Answer:
𝑧𝑧 2 − 2𝑧𝑧 + 3 − 4𝑖𝑖 − 6 − 3𝑖𝑖 = 0
𝑧𝑧 2 − 2𝑧𝑧 − (3 + 7𝑖𝑖) = 0
Use the quadratic formula where π‘Žπ‘Ž = 1, 𝑏𝑏 = −2 π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž 𝑐𝑐 = −(3 + 7𝑖𝑖)
𝑧𝑧 =
To complete this later!!!
2 ± οΏ½4 + 4 × 1 × (3 + 7𝑖𝑖)
2
𝑧𝑧 =
2 ± √16 + 28𝑖𝑖
2
𝑧𝑧 =
2 − 𝑖𝑖 3 − 3𝑖𝑖
×
3 + 3𝑖𝑖 3 − 3𝑖𝑖
Task
Answer:
6 − 6𝑖𝑖 − 3𝑖𝑖 + 3𝑖𝑖 2
𝑧𝑧 =
9 − 9𝑖𝑖 2
𝑧𝑧 =
Task
𝑧𝑧 =
6 − 9𝑖𝑖 − 3
9+9
1
1
3 − 9𝑖𝑖 1 1
= − 𝑖𝑖. 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦𝑦 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 π‘₯π‘₯ = π‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Žπ‘Ž 𝑦𝑦 = − .
18
6 2
6
2
9
Solution
Substitute the root: (1 + 2𝑖𝑖)2 + (𝑝𝑝 + 5𝑖𝑖)(1 + 2𝑖𝑖) + π‘žπ‘ž(2 − 𝑖𝑖) = 0
1 + 4𝑖𝑖 − 4 + 𝑝𝑝 + 2𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 + 5𝑖𝑖 − 10 + 2π‘žπ‘ž − π‘žπ‘žπ‘žπ‘ž = 0 + 0𝑖𝑖
Equating real parts: −13 + 𝑝𝑝 + 2π‘žπ‘ž = 0 and imaginary parts: 9 + 2𝑝𝑝 − π‘žπ‘ž = 0.
𝑝𝑝 = 13 − 2π‘žπ‘ž. Substitute in (2): 9 + 2(13 − 2π‘žπ‘ž) − π‘žπ‘ž = 0; −14 − 4π‘žπ‘ž − π‘žπ‘ž = −9
−5π‘žπ‘ž = −9 + 14
π‘žπ‘ž = −1. Subst to get 𝑝𝑝: 𝑝𝑝 = 13 − 2(−1) = 15
(b) 𝑧𝑧 = 1 − 2𝑖𝑖 is also a solution.
Task
Answer: working in reverse for the solution of a quadratic equation, we get:
if 𝑧𝑧 = 3 + √6𝑖𝑖 is a root and also 𝑧𝑧 = 3 − √6𝑖𝑖.
Thus 𝑧𝑧 − (3 + √6𝑖𝑖) = 0 and 𝑧𝑧 − (3 − √6𝑖𝑖) = 0
Then �𝑧𝑧 − οΏ½3 + √6𝑖𝑖�� οΏ½ 𝑧𝑧 − οΏ½3 − √6𝑖𝑖�� = 0
Use FOIL 𝑧𝑧 2 − 3𝑧𝑧 + √6𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 3𝑧𝑧 − √6𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 + 9 + 6 = 0
𝑧𝑧 2 − 6𝑧𝑧 + 15 = 0.
GEOMETRICAL REPRESENTATION OF COMPLEX NUMBERS
Argand diagram is what we call the plane that will allow us to plot complex numbers. It
is named after the Swiss mathematician Jean Argand (1768 –1822). Using the π‘₯π‘₯-axis as
the real axis, and the y-axis as the imaginary axis, the ordered pairs (π‘Žπ‘Ž,b) reflect
complex numbers of the form π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏.
10
The plane of two axes representing complex numbers as points is called the complex
plane or Argand Plane. The diagram which represents complex number in the Argand
Plane is called Argand Diagram.
If 𝑧𝑧 = π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏, then 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅(𝑧𝑧) = π‘Žπ‘Ž and 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼(𝑧𝑧) = 𝑏𝑏.
Absolute value
The absolute value (or magnitude or modulus) |𝑧𝑧| of a complex number 𝑧𝑧 = π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 is its
distance to the origin:
This is shown below:
11
From the image above, we can see that |𝑧𝑧| = √π‘Žπ‘Ž2 + 𝑏𝑏 2 is nothing more than the length
of the line segment (vector) that we are using to represent the complex number 𝑧𝑧 = π‘Žπ‘Ž +
𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏. |𝑧𝑧| = οΏ½(−1)2 + 1 = √2. This interpretation also tells us that the inequality |𝑧𝑧1 | < |𝑧𝑧2 |
means that 𝑧𝑧1 is closer to the origin (in the complex plane) than 𝑧𝑧2 is. But this done not
give us an indication of the angle of inclination of the 𝑧𝑧1 and 𝑧𝑧2 . We now turn to the
angle πœƒπœƒ, called the argument.
The angle πœƒπœƒ is called the argument of the complex number 𝑧𝑧. Notation: arg 𝑧𝑧 = πœƒπœƒ. The
argument is defined in an ambiguous way: it is only defined up to a multiple of 2πœ‹πœ‹ (360o)
radians. For example, the argument of −1 + 0𝑖𝑖 could be πœ‹πœ‹ (1800), or −πœ‹πœ‹, or 3πœ‹πœ‹, etc. In
general one says arg(−1) = tan−1 (−1) = πœ‹πœ‹ + π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜π‘˜, where π‘˜π‘˜ may be any integer.
Now let’s look at just one point in detail 𝑃𝑃(π‘₯π‘₯, 𝑦𝑦) = π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖.
12
𝑧𝑧1 = π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ cos πœƒπœƒ + π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ sin πœƒπœƒ = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ( cos πœƒπœƒ + 𝑖𝑖 sin πœƒπœƒ). In the 4th quadrant, we know cos is
+ve and sin is –ve, so 𝑧𝑧2 = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ(cos πœƒπœƒ − 𝑖𝑖 sin πœƒπœƒ). Hence z1 and z2 are conjugate pairs and
we write z2 as 𝑧𝑧̅ = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ(cos πœƒπœƒ − 𝑖𝑖 sin πœƒπœƒ).
|𝑧𝑧| = 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠(π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ 2 (cos π‘₯π‘₯)^2 + π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ^2 (sin π‘₯π‘₯)^2 ) = 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠 (π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ 2 (cos2 π‘₯π‘₯ + sin2 π‘₯π‘₯)) = οΏ½π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ 2 = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ
π‘₯π‘₯
cos πœƒπœƒ = then π‘₯π‘₯ = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ πœƒπœƒ and 𝑦𝑦 = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ sin πœƒπœƒ
π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ
The Greek letters πœƒπœƒ (theta) and πœ‘πœ‘ (phi) are often used for angles. In the calculus it is
convenient to measure angles in radians instead of degrees. An angle πœƒπœƒ in radians is
defined as the length of the arc of the angle on a circle of radius one. Since a circle of
radius one has circumference 2πœ‹πœ‹. Thus 360 degrees = 2πœ‹πœ‹ radians.
The radian measure
The convention for Complex numbers is to use radians as the measure for angles. But
what are the radians?
An arc of a circle is a "portion" of the circumference of the circle. The length of an arc
is simply the length of its "portion" of the circumference. Actually, the circumference
itself can be considered an arc length.
13
The length of an arc (or arc length) is traditionally symbolized by 𝑠𝑠. In the diagram
above, it can be said that arc AB subtends angle πœƒπœƒ.
If the length of an arc of a circle, 𝑠𝑠, (think of straightening it out), is the same as the
length of the circle's radius, π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ, a unique situation occurs. The angle, πœƒπœƒ, created by this
situation is called a radian.
A radian is the measure of an angle πœƒπœƒ that, when drawn as a central angle, subtends
an arc whose length equals the length of the radius of the circle.
The measure of πœƒπœƒ = 1 radian.
When radius r = arc length r, the angle πœƒπœƒ measures 1 radian.
Radian measure is another way of expressing the measure (size) of an angle. It is
considered to be a "pure" measure since it is based upon the radius of the circle being
wrapped along the circumference. While at first it may seem easier to work with
degrees, you will find that there is a mathematical simplicity to the use of radians. So,
now we have two methods of expressing the measure of an angle: in degrees and in
radians.
𝑠𝑠
If the arc length 𝑠𝑠 is twice the radius π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ, the πœƒπœƒ = 2 radians, and so on. Therefore, πœƒπœƒ = .
14
π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ
NB: Radians, being a ratio of two lengths, are not units OR do not have units of
measurement.
Example
Convert 50 degrees to radians.
Answer
Example
Convert
Answer
πœ‹πœ‹
6
to degrees.
15
Also, we know that the arc length, 𝑠𝑠 = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ. When the arc length equals an entire
circumference (2πœ‹πœ‹πœ‹πœ‹), we can use 𝑠𝑠 = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ to get
2πœ‹πœ‹πœ‹πœ‹ = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ
2πœ‹πœ‹ = πœƒπœƒ
This verifies what we already know to be true, that 2πœ‹πœ‹ π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ = 3600 .
Task
How long is the arc subtended by an angle of 3150 on a circle of radius 20 cm?
Task
Answers
NOTE: By convention if the units are not specified they are RADIANS.
NB: Radians are real numbers which do not carry units, hence we can freely do
πœ‹πœ‹
operations with radian measure. For example, × sin πœ‹πœ‹ is valid, while 450 × sin 1800 is
√2
2
4
πœ‹πœ‹
ridiculous. From now, cos −1 οΏ½ οΏ½ = .
Polar form
4
Let’s now take a look at the first alternate form for a complex number. If we think of the
non-zero complex number 𝑧𝑧 = π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 as the point (π‘Žπ‘Ž, 𝑏𝑏) in the π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯π‘₯-plane we also know
that we can represent this point by the polar coordinates (𝒓𝒓, 𝜽𝜽), where π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ is the distance
of the point from the origin and πœƒπœƒ is the angle, in radians, from the positive π‘₯π‘₯-axis to the
ray (line segment) connecting the origin to the point (anticlockwise).
16
Task
For a given complex number 𝑧𝑧 pick any of the possible values of the argument, say πœƒπœƒ. If
you now increase the value of πœƒπœƒ, which is really just increasing the angle that the point
makes with the positive π‘₯π‘₯ −axis, you are rotating the point about the origin in a counter-
clockwise manner. Since it takes 2πœ‹πœ‹ radians to make one complete revolution you will
be back at your initial starting point when you reach πœƒπœƒ + 2πœ‹πœ‹ and so have a new value of
the argument. See the figure below.
If you keep increasing the angle you will again be back at the starting point when you
reach πœƒπœƒ + 4πœ‹πœ‹, which is again a new value of the argument. Continuing in this fashion we
can see that every time we reach a new value of the argument we will simply be adding
multiples of 2πœ‹πœ‹ onto the original value of the argument.
Likewise, if you start at πœƒπœƒ and decrease the angle you will be rotating the point about the
origin in a clockwise manner and will return to your original starting point when you
reach πœƒπœƒ − 2πœ‹πœ‹. Continuing in this fashion and we can again see that each new value of
17
the argument will be found by subtracting a multiple of 2πœ‹πœ‹ from the original value of the
argument.
Task
Show that the conjugate is 𝑧𝑧̅ = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ (cos πœƒπœƒ − sin πœƒπœƒ).
You can see here that a conjugate is a reflection of the point on the π‘₯π‘₯-axis in the
complex plane.
Multiplication of two complex numbers (in polar)
Solutions
Task
Show division of complex numbers in polar form
18
Task
Task
Calculate the modulus of
CIRCLES
2+𝑖𝑖
3−𝑖𝑖
in two ways. Also find the argument πœƒπœƒ.
Since |𝑧𝑧| defines the size of 𝑧𝑧 from the origin (modulus/magnitude), then
{𝑧𝑧: |𝑧𝑧 + 0 + 0𝑖𝑖| = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ } defines the collection of points that are all distance π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ from the
origin. This describes a circle. Also {𝑧𝑧: |𝑧𝑧 + π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏| = π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ, where π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ, π‘Žπ‘Ž, 𝑏𝑏 ∈ 𝑅𝑅} is a circle,
radius π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ with centre (−π‘Žπ‘Ž − 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏). The centre has been translated from the origin – π‘Žπ‘Ž units
in the real direction, and – 𝑏𝑏 in the imaginary direction. For a circle π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 𝑦𝑦 2 = 4 with
radius 2 and the origin is the centre. (π‘₯π‘₯ + 1)2 + (𝑦𝑦 + 2)2 = 1 this is a circle of radius 1
and centre is (-1,-2).
Example
Sketch |𝑧𝑧| = 1.
Answer
We know if 𝑧𝑧 = π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖, then we remember from last lecture |𝑧𝑧| = οΏ½π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 𝑦𝑦 2 .
19
Hence |𝑧𝑧| = 1 is the same as οΏ½π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 𝑦𝑦 2 = 1. Which becomes π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + 𝑦𝑦 2 = 12 . This is a
circle of radius 1 and centred at (0,0) as shown below.
Example
Sketch |𝑧𝑧 − 3 + 0𝑖𝑖| = 2.
Answer
|π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 3| = |(π‘₯π‘₯ − 3) + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖|
Thus (π‘₯π‘₯ − 3)2 + 𝑦𝑦 2 = (2)2 which is circle of centre (3,0) and radius 2.
Example
Sketch |𝑧𝑧 − 𝑖𝑖| = 1.
Answer
|π‘₯π‘₯ + 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 − 𝑖𝑖| = 1
|π‘₯π‘₯ + (𝑦𝑦 − 1)𝑖𝑖| = 1
οΏ½π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + (𝑦𝑦 − 1)2 = 1
20
π‘₯π‘₯ 2 + (𝑦𝑦 − 1)2 = 12
Task
Sketch the following
(a) |𝑧𝑧 − 2 + 3𝑖𝑖| = 3.
(b) |𝑧𝑧| < 3 all points inside the circle centre (0,0) and radius 3. Points on the
circumference are not part of the solution. Show it as a dotted line.
(c) 2 < |𝑧𝑧| < 3 represents the region between circles of radii 2 and 3.
(d) arg 𝑧𝑧 <
πœ‹πœ‹
2
SQUARE ROOTS OF COMPLEX NUMBERS
We can use complex numbers to compute square roots.
Example
Find the square root of −8 + 6𝑖𝑖.
Answer
Squaring both sides;
οΏ½−8 + 6𝑖𝑖 = π‘Žπ‘Ž + 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏
21
After comparing real parts and imaginary parts.
π‘Žπ‘Ž2 = −9
π‘Žπ‘Ž = ±√−9 = ±3𝑖𝑖
In other π‘Žπ‘Ž = 3𝑖𝑖 π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ π‘Žπ‘Ž = −3𝑖𝑖. But there is a problem.
22
The solutions are 1 + 3𝑖𝑖 and −1 − 3𝑖𝑖.
NB: √4 = 2 but π‘₯π‘₯ 2 − 4 = 0 gives us π‘₯π‘₯ = ±2.
Task
If 𝑧𝑧 2 is known to be 3 − 4𝑖𝑖 what is 𝑧𝑧?
23
Download