POSITION PAPER
ANALYSIS
Structure of the Position Paper
I. Introduction
1.Introduce the topic
2.Provide background on the topic to explain why it is
important that the audience/reader must believe in
your argument
3.Assert the thesis (your view of the issue).
Structure of the Position Paper
◦ Body (Argument)
A. Assert point #1 of your claims
1. Give your educated and informed opinion
2. Provide support/proof using more than one source
B. Assert point #2 of your counter/claims
1. Give your educated and informed opinion
2. Provide support/proof using more than one source
C. Assert point #3 of your claims
1. Give your educated and informed opinion
2. Provide support/proof using more than one source
Structure of the Position Paper
◦III. Conclusion
A. Restate your argument
B. Provide a plan of action but do not introduce
new information
Smoking remains a pervasive global health
concern, contributing to a myriad of diseases and
premature deaths. Despite widespread awareness
of its detrimental effects, smoking persists as a
challenging public health issue. This demands that
comprehensive strategies to prevent smoking,
emphasizing the need for a multi-faceted approach
that addresses both individual and societal factors
must be focused.
Another key assertion is the necessity of strict
regulations and legislation to curb smoking rates. Supporters
argue that measures like increased taxes on tobacco
products, graphic warning labels, and smoke-free public
spaces can deter smoking. However, counterclaims question
the efficacy of punitive measures, emphasizing the
importance of balancing regulation with support for
cessation programs. Critics argue that punitive measures may
disproportionately affect vulnerable populations and lead to
unintended consequences.
Proponents argue that education and awareness campaigns
are pivotal in preventing smoking initiation. By disseminating
information about the health risks associated with smoking,
especially among adolescents, advocates believe that
individuals can make informed choices. However,
counterclaims highlight the limitations of information
dissemination alone. Studies suggest that while knowledge is
essential, additional factors such as peer pressure, socioeconomic conditions, and mental health also contribute to
smoking behavior.
Advocates for this claim assert that facilitating access to
smoking cessation resources, including counseling and
nicotine replacement therapies, is crucial in helping
individuals quit. Counterclaims, however, emphasize the
need for personalized approaches, as one-size-fits-all
cessation programs may not effectively address the diverse
needs of smokers. Additionally, skeptics question the longterm success of cessation programs, pointing to high rates of
relapse.
Preventing smoking necessitates a comprehensive and
nuanced approach. While education, regulation, and access
to cessation resources play vital roles, acknowledging the
complexity of individual and societal factors is imperative. A
holistic strategy that combines targeted interventions,
community engagement, and continual research is essential
in achieving a smoke-free future. By recognizing and
addressing the diverse factors influencing smoking behavior,
society can make meaningful strides towards a healthier and
smoke-free environment for all.
Answer the following questions:
1. What is the topic of the position paper?
2. What is the position of the author?
3. What are the claims? Are they justified properly? Explain.
4. What are the counter claims? Are they presented appropriately?
Explain.
5. Is the position presented properly? Explain.
6. Give a possible title for the position paper.