DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF JUVVALADINNE
FISHERY HARBOUR IN NELLORE DISTRICT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH
March 2017
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CONTENTS
Page No
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
General
1.2
Economic Investigations
CHAPTER 2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.7
4.11
OVERVIEW OF ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERY SECTOR
General
....................................................... 12
Socio- economic schemes for the welfare of fishermen community ............... 14
Need to Develop Fishery Harbour at Juvvaladinne Nellore District ............... 15
Design Fleet Size
....................................................... 15
CHAPTER-4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA
General
......................................................... 4
Fishery Resources
......................................................... 5
Marine Fisheries
......................................................... 6
Fish Production and Trend
......................................................... 8
Fish Production Potential
......................................................... 9
Fish Export and Trend
....................................................... 10
Fish Catch Utilisation and Fish Consumption in India .................................... 11
CHAPTER-3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
......................................................... 1
......................................................... 3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Introduction
....................................................... 17
Time – Scale
....................................................... 17
Fleet Size
....................................................... 18
Fishing Operations
....................................................... 18
Catch Composition and Vessel Landings ....................................................... 18
Sea-going personnel
....................................................... 20
Shore-based facilities
....................................................... 21
Transport
....................................................... 21
Marketing
....................................................... 22
Ownership and Management
....................................................... 23
4.10.1
Fishery Harbour
....................................................... 23
4.10.2
Fishing Vessels
....................................................... 25
4.10.3
Fish Auction hall, Net mending shed, Gear shed, Rest shed,
Ice plant and Cold storage ....................................................... 25
Investment
....................................................... 25
4.11.1
Fixed Assets
....................................................... 25
4.11.2
Operating Capital
....................................................... 26
Page ii
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNEFISHERY HARBOUR
4.12
Government Revenue and Expenditure
CHAPTER – 5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
27
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
Introduction
....................................................... 31
Economic Analysis
....................................................... 31
5.2.1
Economic Evaluation Methods .................................................. 32
5.2.1.1
Net Present Value Method .............................................. 32
5.2.1.2
Benefit Cost Ratio Method ............................................. 32
5.2.1.3
Internal Rate of Return Method ...................................... 33
Assumptions of a General Nature
....................................................... 33
Sensitivity Analysis of Vessel Operations ....................................................... 34
5.4.1
Basic Vessel Operations ....................................................... 34
5.4.2
A 25% Reduction in Prawn Landings ....................................... 34
5.4.3
A 20% Reduction in Total Landings of Fish and Prawns ......... 35
5.4.4
A 25% Increase in Investment in a Fishing Vessel ................... 36
5.4.5
What quantity of landings is required to maintain a minimum
of 12% return on vessel investment? ......................................... 36
5.4.6 The Situation in a "Poor" Fishing Season ............................................. 37
Sensitivity Analysis of the Project
....................................................... 38
Appendix – 1
Fleet Size, Fishermen Employed and Average Annual Landings .............................. 40
Appendix - 2
Average Landings and Value per Season for a Typical 9 Metre Motorised Craft
(MC), 12 Metre Gill Netter (GN), 15 Metre Trawler and 24 Metre Tuna Long
Liner
....................................................... 42
Appendix – 3
General Information, Operational Schedule and Estimated Annual Financial
Statement for a Typical 9 Metre Motorised Craft (MC), 12 Metre Gill Netter (GN),
15 Metre Trawler and 24 Metre Tuna Long Liner ...................................................... 43
Appendix – 4
Recovery Factors and Percentages of Landings Allocated to various Products and
Mark
....................................................... 46
Appendix – 5
Allocation of Raw Material and Products Produced for Each Market Outlet ............ 47
Appendix – 6
Estimates of Capacities of Shore – establishments ..................................................... 48
Page iii
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNEFISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix 7 (a)
Cost of Production, Distribution and Marketing per Tonne of Fish and Prawn
Products for any Year 1 – 14
....................................................... 49
Appendix – 7 (b)
Retail or F.O.B Prices per Tonne of Product Weight ................................................. 51
Appendix – 7 (c)
Consolidated Statement of Cost of Production, Distribution and Marketing of Fish
and Prawn Products - For any Year 1 – 14
....................................................... 52
Appendix – 8
Cash outflow Statement - New Investment
....................................................... 54
Appendix – 9
Cash outflow StatementOperating Costs for Integrated Project Operations .............. 55
Appendix – 10
Cash Inflow StatementIncome from Sale of Fish and Crustacean Products .............. 56
Appendix – 11
Reconciliation of Cash Inflow and Cash Outflow Statements ................................... 57
Appendix - 11 A
(1)
A 20% reduction in total landings
....................................................... 58
Appendix - 11 B
(2) A 25% reduction in export income
....................................................... 59
Appendix - 11 C
(3) A 25% increase in Investment
....................................................... 60
CHAPTER 5
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.10
5.11
ENGINEERING INVESTIGATIONS
Introduction
Location of site
Datum
Grid
Topographic & Hydrographic survey
Tide Levels
Tide Measurement
Current Measurement
Wind climate
Wave climate
Tropical depressions/Cyclones
....................................................... 61
....................................................... 61
....................................................... 62
....................................................... 62
....................................................... 62
....................................................... 63
....................................................... 63
....................................................... 64
....................................................... 64
....................................................... 65
....................................................... 65
Page iv
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNEFISHERY HARBOUR
5.12
5.13
5.14
Visibility
....................................................... 66
Demarcation of High Tide Line and Low Tide Line ...................................... 66
Subsoil investigations
....................................................... 66
5.14.1
Boring in Soil
....................................................... 67
5.14.2
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) .............................................. 67
5.14.3
Sampling
....................................................... 68
5.14.4
Laboratory Testing
....................................................... 68
5.14.5
Collection of Bed Samples & Testing ....................................... 68
5.14.6
Collection of Water Samples & Testing .................................... 68
5.14.7
Conclusion
....................................................... 69
CHAPTER 6
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.8
DESIGN OF FISHERY HARBOUR
Design fishing fleet size
....................................................... 82
Fishing vessel characteristics
....................................................... 82
Depth of the Harbour
....................................................... 82
Design data
....................................................... 82
Computation of quay length for landing, idle-berthing, outfitting and repair
quays
....................................................... 83
6.5.1
Landing quay length
....................................................... 84
6.5.2
Outfitting quay length
....................................................... 85
6.5.3
Repair quay length
....................................................... 87
6.5.4
Idle-berthing quay length ....................................................... 87
6.5.5
Total Quay Length
....................................................... 88
Fishery harbour layout
....................................................... 88
Waterside facilities
....................................................... 90
6.7.1
Training walls
....................................................... 90
6.7.2
Quay
....................................................... 90
6.7.3
Dredging and Disposal
....................................................... 91
6.7.4
RC Sloping hard
....................................................... 92
6.7.5
Revetment
....................................................... 92
6.7.6
Navigational aids
....................................................... 92
Landside facilities
....................................................... 92
6.8.1
Land reclamation
....................................................... 92
6.8.2
Fish handling and auction hall ................................................... 93
6.8.3
Fish loading area
....................................................... 98
6.8.4
Fishery Administrative office .................................................... 99
6.8.5
Fishermen’s Gear sheds
....................................................... 99
6.8.6
Net mending sheds
....................................................... 99
6.8.7
Boat Repair shops
..................................................... 100
6.8.8
Restaurant
..................................................... 100
6.8.9
Fishermen Rest shed
..................................................... 101
6.8.10
Public Toilet blocks
..................................................... 101
6.8.11
Fish Merchants Dormitory ..................................................... 101
6.8.12
Commercial Complex
..................................................... 102
Page v
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNEFISHERY HARBOUR
6.8.13
6.8.14
6.8.15
6.8.16
6.8.17
6.8.18
6.8.19
6.8.20
6.8.21
6.8.22
6.8.23
6.8.24
6.8.25
6.8.26
6.8.27
6.8.28
CHAPTER 7
7.1
7.2
Coastal Police Station
..................................................... 102
Community Hall
..................................................... 102
Radio-communication tower ................................................... 103
Security/Guard house and Compound wall ............................. 103
Approach road and internal roads ............................................ 104
Parking areas for vehicles ..................................................... 104
Boat Parking/Repair yard ..................................................... 104
Boat building and timber yard ................................................. 105
Fresh water supply and distribution system ............................ 105
Sea water supply and distribution system................................ 107
Drainage/Sewerage and wastewater treatment system ............ 108
Electric power and lighting system ......................................... 109
Ice plant and chilled storage .................................................... 109
Civic amenity sites
..................................................... 109
Fire extinguishers
..................................................... 110
Greenery and Landscaping ..................................................... 110
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
Unit Rates
Abstract Cost Estimate
..................................................... 112
..................................................... 113
LIST OF DRAWINGS:
AP- JUVL /01
AP- JUVL /02
AP- JUVL /03
AP- JUVL /04
AP - JUVL /05
AP - JUVL /06
:
:
:
:
:
:
AP - JUVL /07
AP - JUVL /08
:
:
AP - JUVL /09
:
AP - JUVL /10
:
AP - JUVL /11
:
AP - JUVL /12
AP - JUVL /13
AP - JUVL /14
:
:
:
Map showing location and approaches to the site
Topographic and hydrographic survey map
Fishery Harbour layout
Cross Section of Breakwater Trunk and Head
Map showing proposed borehole locations
Map showing proposed tide & current observation
locations
Quay (Plan, elevation and section)
Fish handling and auction hall for MFV’s (Plan,
elevation and section)
Fish handling and packing hall for Tuna (Plan,
elevation and section)
Fish handling and auction hall for FRP boats (Plan,
elevation and section)
Fishery administrative office (Plan, elevation and
section)
Fishermen’s gear shed (Plan, elevation and section)
Net mending shed (Plan, elevation and section)
Boat repair shop (Plan, elevation and section)
Page vi
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNEFISHERY HARBOUR
AP - JUVL /15
AP - JUVL /16
AP - JUVL /17
AP - JUVL /18
AP - JUVL /19
:
:
:
:
:
AP - JUVL /20
AP - JUVL /21
AP - JUVL /22
AP - JUVL /23
AP - JUVL /24
AP - JUVL /25
AP - JUVL /26
AP - JUVL /27
AP - JUVL /28
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Dormitory (Plan, elevation and section)
Restaurant (Plan, elevation and section)
Fishermen’s rest shed (Plan, elevation and section)
Public toilet block (Plan, elevation and section)
Radio-communication tower (Plan, elevation and
section)
Security/guard house (Plan, elevation and section)
R.C. sloping hard (Plan, elevation and section)
Road and compound wall sections
Ice Plant (Plan, elevation and section)
Shopping Complex (Plan, elevation and section)
Coastal Police (Plan, elevation and section)
Community Hall (Plan, elevation and section)
Guest House (Plan, elevation and section)
Fish Drying Platform (Plan, elevation and section)
Page vii
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNEFISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER1
INTRODUCTION
1.1
General
Proposed Juvvaladinne fishery harbour site has been visited during the first week
of April 2016, during economic investigations detailed information have been
collected regarding fishing vessel type, size, operational schedule, landings etc.
and they were analysed after scrutiny. The proposed Juvvaladinne fishery harbour
site is located at Bogole Mandal in Nellore district.
Nellore district is one of the 13 districts of Andhra Pradesh. The population of the
district according to the Census 2011 is 29,66,082 of which 29% were urban.
Nellore city is its administrative headquarters. The district is bordered by the Bay
of Bengal to the east, Kadappa district to the west, Prakasam District to the north,
Chittoor district and Thiruvallur district of Tamil Nadu to the south. In June 2008,
Government of Andhra Pradesh officially renamed the district as Sri Potti Sri
Ramulu Nellore District after the freedom fighter and revolutionary Potti Sri
Ramulu, who died fasting in an attempt to achieve the formation of a separate state
for the Telugu people.
It was part of the composite Madras state until 1 October 1953. On 1 November
1956, when the states were reorganized on a linguistic basis, the district came
under Andhra Pradesh. Nellore played a major role in the formation of Andhra
Pradesh state. Potti Sriramulu, a Telugu patriot and activist, fasted to death for the
formation of Andhra Pradesh state. Nellore people participated in Indian
Independence movement. Notable freedom fighters are Muttharaju Gopalarao and
Potti Sriramulu. In 1970, part of Nellore district was split off to become part of
Prakasam district.
The district lies between 13 30’ and 15 6’ of Northern latitude and 70 5’ and 80
15’ of Eastern latitude. Nellore's total land area is 13,076 sq. km and it has an
average elevation of 19 metres. About the half of the total area is cultivated and
the rest is wasteland because of it is rocky land, sandy coastline or covered with
scrub jungles. Pennar, Swarnamukhi and Gundlakamma are the main rivers that
flow through the most of the district. They are not navigable and are mainly used
for irrigation purposes. Tributaries to Penna like Kandaleru and Boggeru serve the
remaining area. The rainfall ranges from 700–1000 mm through South West and
North East Monsoons.
Nellore is also famous for quality rice production and aqua (prawn and fish)
culture. Nellore district is called the "Shrimp capital of India" due to its high
production of cultured shrimp. About 70 percent of the total work force is
dependent upon agriculture either as farmers or as agricultural labour. The main
Page 1
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
crops are rice paddy and sugar cane. It is particularly famous for a rice breed
called "Molagolukulu". Other crops are cotton, lemon and oil seeds (like peanuts)
and horticultural seeds.
A dam is located at Somasila across the Pennar River that flows through the
narrow Velikonda Hills. Another dam is located at Gandipalem across a tributary
of Pennar. They support irrigation for many villages. The handloom sector is a
small scale industry, Venkatagiri and Patur are important handloom centres in the
district noted for their traditional handcrafted fine cotton and silk sarees embrodied
with pure zari. Krishnapatnam is a major port and market center situated at a
distance of 20 km. The port is expected to become a world-class deep-water port.
Iron ore and granite are being exported from Krishna Patnam to other countries
like China.
Figure 1: Nellore District Map
It comprises 46 Revenue Mandals, 12 Agriculture Sub Divisions and 5 Revenue
Divisions Nellore, Naidupeta, Atmakur, Kavali and Gudur. There are 968 Gram
Panchayats, One Corpoartion – Nellore and 6 Municipalities namely Kavali,
Gudur, Venkatagiri, Naidupeta, Sullurpeta and Atmakur. National Highway 5
serves the major towns of Sullurpeta, Naidupeta, Gudur, Nellore, Kovur and
Kavali in the district. The nearest international airport is at Chennai, 170 km to the
Page 2
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
south. The national railway runs throughout the length of the district. Nellore is
situated between Gudur Junction and Vijayawada Junction on the Chennai–
Howrah main line.
Juvvaladinne is a Village in Bogole Mandal in Nellore District and it is located
47 KM towards North from District head quarters Nellore and 12 KM from
Bogole. Kavali, Nellore, Kandukur, Gudur are the nearby towna to Juvvaladinne.
Total population of Juvvaladinne is 9464 comprising males are 4,784 and Females
are 4,680 living in 2430 Houses and total area of Juvvaladinne is 3024 hectares.
Kavali is the Nearest Town to Juvvaladinne. Kavali is 25 km from Juvvaladinne.
Road connectivity is there from Kavali to Juvvaladinne.
Nearby
viilages
are
Kothakadapalem,
Kothabangarupalem,
Alicherlabangarupalem, Pathabangarupalem, Kolladinne, Jadagogula, T C Palem,
Patapalem, Oddipalem, Pandigunta and Patakadapalem. Nearest railway station is
at Kavali. Bogole the Mandal headquarters is located 40 km towards North of
Nellore. Total population of Bogole is 13,627 males are 6,781 and Females are
6,846 living in 3169 Houses. Total area of Bogole is 2589 hectares. Kavali is a
town in Kavali Mandal and it is located 62 km towards North from district head
quarters Nellore.
1.2
Conducting of Economic Investigations
During detailed economic investigations, primary and secondary data from the
fishing boat owners / operators, fishermen co-operative societies, fish and prawn
merchants, operators of ice plants etc. have been collected at the project area. In
addition to the above, conduct of socio economic study to know the socio economic
conditions of the fisher folk of the proposed project area. Collected the number of
mechanised, motorised and non-mechanised fishing vessels operating at the project
site and their size, method of fishing, operational schedule, fish and prawn landings
per trip and per season, disposal of the catch, fishing vessel investment, annual
operating costs, cost of fuel & ice, cost of processing, distribution and marketing of
fish and prawn products, investment required for construction of ice plant and chilled
fish storage, infrastructure facilities available etc.
The detailed economic investigation at the project site provided information an actual
fleet size operating at the proposed project area and also fishing boats belonging to
nearby area which can make use of the proposed project facilities. Fishing Boat
details available from various sources have also been verified to arrive actual
information on fleet size and their vessel economics at the proposed project area.
Based on the field study, statistics furnished by Department of Fisheries and further
discussion, design fleet size for the proposed Juvvaladinne fishery harbor has been
arrived and also based on future projection based on the growth of the fishing boats
with 50 years forecast and also socio economic conditions of the fisher folk and the
capability of active fishermen at the project area.
Page 3
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER2
FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT IN INDIA
2.1
General
Among the top ten fish producing countries, India is the second largest producer of
fish in the world. China is by far the top producer of fish with 55.3 million tonnes
in 2012 up more than 1% from 2011. Apart from the primary production sector,
fisheries and aquaculture provide numerous jobs in ancillary activities such as fish
processing, packaging, marketing and distribution, manufacturing of fish
processing equipment, net and gear making, ice production and supply, boat
construction and maintenance, research and administration. All of this
employment, together with dependants, is estimated to support the livelihoods of
14.49 million people. The annual per capita consumption of fishery products has
grown steadily in developing countries from 5.2 kg in 1961 to 17.0 kg in 2009. A
sizeable share of fish consumed in developed countries consists of imports, and
owing to steady demand and declining domestic fishery production (down 10% in
the period 2000–2010), their dependence on imports, in particular from developing
countries like India, is projected to grow in coming years.
Fishing is one of the oldest means of livelihood of mankind and fisheries sector
play an important role in the national economy and in the socio-economic
development in India. It provides employment opportunities to large sections of
the population, supplies rich protein diet at affordable costs and earns foreign
exchange. The fisheries sector contributes US$ 4.4 billion to the national income.
The present fish production in the country as of 2012-13 is 9.04 million tonnes
whereas the estimated fish potential is about 9.4 million tonnes. Fisheries sector
contributed Rs.78053 crores to the GDP (at current prices) during 2012-13, which
is 0.83% of the total GDP at factor cost and 4.75% of the GDP at factor cost from
agriculture, forestry and fishing. The share of fisheries sector in the total GDP at
factor cost in current prices has doubled from 0.40% in 1950-51 to 0.83% in 201213. The fisheries sector has also been one of the major contributors of foreign
exchange earnings. During 2013-14, export of marine products reached 983 756
tonnes valued at Rs.30 213.26crores (over US$5007.7million).
Importance of the fisheries sector to the Indian economy is widely acknowledged.
Its significance lies in three major areas: First of all, it is a source of animal protein
for human consumption. It is expected that by the year 2020, the fish eating
population in the country would be around 650 million. Secondly, it is a source of
employment. About 2.1 million fisher populace in India draw their livelihood from
fisheries who belong to poor backward community of the society. Thirdly, it is a
source of foreign exchange. Fisheries play an important role in the national
economy, providing full-time or part-time employment to over 14.49 million
peoplewho are engaged fully, partially or in subsidiary activities pertaining to the
Page 4
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
sector. Objectives for future fisheries development include enhancing fish
production, generating employment, improving socio-economic conditions of
fishers, increasing marine products for export, and increasing per capita
availability of fish to about 11 kg/annum. There would be a marginal improvement
in the nutritional status as a result of increased fish consumption. These objectives
are intended to be achieved through an integrated approach to marine and inland
fisheries and aquaculture, taking into account the need for responsible and
sustainable fisheries. Conservation of aquatic resources and genetic bio-diversity is
another thrust area for the next millennium.
2.2
Fishery Resources
India has vast potential for fisheries from both inland and marine resources.
Marine and inland fisheries resources of India are shown in Table below.
Fisheries Resources of India – at a glance
Marine Resources & Fishery Statistics
Coastline (km)
8 118
Exclusive Economic Zone (million km2)
West coast
East coast
A & N Islands
Total
0.86
0.56
0.60
2.02
530
Marine
Inland
Total
3.321
5.714
9.035
Continental shelf (‘000 km2)
Fish production in 2012-13
Fish export in 2013-14
Quantity (‘000 tonnes) 983.756
Value (Rs.in crore) 30213.26
Contribution of fisheries to GDP at current prices (2012-13)
GDP from fisheries(Rs.in crore) Rs.78053
GDP from agriculture
4.75%
In Total GDP
0.83%
Fishing villages (Nos.)
3 432
Fishery centres (Nos.)
1 537
Fisher families (Nos.)
874 749
Fisher folk population (Nos.)
4 056213
Inland Resources
Rivers & canals (km)
195 095
Page 5
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Reservoirs (lakh ha.)
29.26367
Tanks and ponds (lakh ha)
2.3
24.3276
Floodplain/derelict water bodies (lakh ha)
7.983
Brackish water (lakh ha)
11.55
Saline/alkaline affected area (lakh ha)
12.40
Marine Fisheries
Marine fisheries is a renewable resource and is considered to be a pro-poor
subsector. Marine fish production has been still found as a capture fishery resource
registering the highest production (40%) from the northwest coast and the lowest
(6%) from the northeast coast, with highest landings being through mechanized
craft (64%). The traditional (artisanal) fishery, on which most people depend
accounted for 37% in 1982, is currently contributing only 8%.
According to the Handbook on Fisheries Statistics, 2014 brought out by
Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying & Fisheries (DAHD&F), Ministry of
Agriculture, Government of India which included data of National Marine
Fisheries Census 2010, the Indian fishing craft consists of a total of 199 141
fishing crafts, comprising of 72 749 mechanized vessels and 73 710 motorized and
the remaining 52982 traditional non-mechanized craft. As was reported in 2010,
traditional crafts and motorized crafts are concentrated more in the east coast (72%
and 58%) whereas the mechanized vessels are more along the west coast (58%).
The total number of fishing craft also is more on the east coast.
Fishing Craft in India
Sl.
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Maritime
State/UT
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Goa
Daman & Diu
Karnataka
Kerala
Lakshadweep
7
Islands
8. Tamil Nadu
9. Puducherry
Andhra
10.
Pradesh
11. Odisha
12. West Bengal
Mechanized
Traditional nonMotorized
fishing vessels
mechanized
craft
(MFVs)
craft
18 278
8 238
1 884
13 016
1 563
2 783
1 142
1 297
227
1 000
359
321
3 643
7 518
2 862
4 722
11 175
5 884
Total
28 400
17 362
2 666
1 680
14 023
21 781
129
606
727
1462
10 692
369
24 942
1 562
10 436
662
46 070
2 593
3 167
10 737
17 837
31 741
2 248
14 282
3 922
-
4 656
3 066
10 826
17 348
Page 6
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Sl.
No.
Maritime
State/UT
13. A & N Islands
Total
Mechanized
Traditional nonMotorized
fishing vessels
mechanized
Total
craft
(MFVs)
craft
61
1 591
1 637
3 189
72749
73 410
52 982 199 141
After declaration of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in 1977, the oceanic
resources available to India are estimated at 2.02 million km2, comprising 0.86
million km2 (42.6 % of the total) on the west coast, 0.56 million km2 (27.7%) on
the east coast and 0.60 million km2 (29.7%) around the Andaman and Nicobar
Islands. The continental shelf area amounts to 530 000 km2 of which 71% area is
available in the Arabian Sea (west coast) and the remaining 29% in the Bay of
Bengal (east coast). The country has a long coastline of 8 118 km and an equally
large area under estuaries, backwaters, lagoons etc., which is highly amenable for
developing capture as well as culture fisheries. As per the National Marine
Fisheries Census, 2010, the marine fisheries activities are spread in approximately
1537 landing centres and 3 432 fishing villages located along the coastline on the
mainland and the two Island territories of Lakshadweep and the Andaman &
Nicobar Islands.
The estimated marine resource potential of the Indian EEZ is 4.42 million tonnes
at the present exploitation rates. In marine fisheries, while inshore waters have
been almost exploited to the sustainable levels, contributions from the deep sea
have been insignificant. The trend based surveys have indicated that in the depth
range up to 100 m, which contributes to about 86% of the total exploited
resources; practically there is little possibility of witnessing quantitative increase
in fish production. However, the depth ranges beyond 100 m have avenues of
expansion, albeit more in qualitative terms. In this domain, the possibility revolves
around oceanic resources like tuna, bill fishes and allied species whose combined
potential is pegged at 0.22 million tonnes with the lucrative yellow fin tuna
contributing to the tune of 40% to it.
Among the maritime States, Gujarat (693560 tonne, 20.88%) has emerged as the
leading producer of marine fish in the country during 2012-13, followed by Kerala
(530 640 tonne, 15.98%), Maharashtra (448910 tonne, 13.52%) and Tamil Nadu
(428440 tonne, 12.90%). These four States together provide nearly 63% of the
marine fish production of the country. Nearly 77% of the fish catch is marketed
fresh. The fish drying and curing industry in India is on the decline, with only
about 5% fish being used for curing. Frozen fish accounts for 9%, 4% goes for
reduction to fish meal, 1% for offal reduction and 4% for miscellaneous purposes.
There have been significant inputs to marine fisheries development in recent years.
Plans have been approved for 7 major and 70 minor fishery harbours and 196 fish
landing centres, of which the 7 major fishery harbours, 45 minor fishery harbours
and 180 FLCs have been commissioned, and others are under construction.
Page 7
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
2.4
Fish Production and Trend
Globally India's share in fisheries production in 2012-13 was about 5.72% of
which marine fish production was 2.1% and inland fish production 3.62%. The
share of India in global fish production has grown gradually, from about 2.6%
during the 1960s and 1970s to the present level of 5.72%. Table below provides a
comparative account of the global and Indian fish production from capture and
culture fisheries.
Fish Production in India and the World
Year
Capture fish
production
(in million
tonnes)
Global
India
Aquaculture
production
(in million
tonnes)
Global
India
Total fish
production
(in million tonnes)
Global
India
2005
92.0
2.816
44.3
3.756
136.3
6.572
(4.82%)
2006
89.7
3.024
47.3
3.845
137.0
6.869
(5.01%)
2007
90.8
2.920
49.9
4.207
140.7
7.127
(5.06%)
2008
90.1
2.978
52.9
4.638
143.0
7.616
(5.33%)
2009
79.6
3.104
55.7
4.894
135.3
7.998
(5.91%)
2010
89.1
3.250
59.0
4.981
148.1
8.231
(5.56%)
2011
93.7
3.372
62.0
5.294
155.7
8.666
(5.56%)
2012
91.3
3.321
66.6
5.719
157.9
9.040
(5.72%)
Note: Capture fish production for India is taken to be that of marine fisheries and aquaculture
production is mainly from inland fisheries
Overall fish production of India has shown an increasing trend from 0.75 million
tonnes in 1950-51 to reach 9.04 million tonnes in 2012-13 registering an average
annual growth rate of around 4.3% since 1950s. With a vast fish production
potential, particularly in inland fisheries (mainly reservoirs) and aquaculture, the
sector has shown an average annual growth rate of about 6% over the Five-Year
Plan periods. In case of marine fisheries, fish production has increased from 0.53
Page 8
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
million tonnes in 1950-51 to 3.321 million tonnes in 2012-13 with an average
annual growth rate of 2.61%. In the inland sector, the growth has been steady,
increasing from 0.218 million tonnes during 1950-51 to about 5.719 million tonnes
in 2012-13, with an annual growth rate of 6.1%.
Fish Production in India (2004-05 to 2013-14)
Year
Fish Production
(‘000 tonnes)
Marine
Inland
Average annual growth rate
(%)
Total
Marine
Inland
Total
2004-05
2 779
3 526
6 305
-5.51
1.97
-1.47
2005-06
2 816
3 756
6 572
1.33
6.52
4.23
2006-07
3 024
3 845
6 869
7.39
2.37
4.52
2007-08
2 920
4 207
7 127
-3.44
9.41
3.76
2008-09
2 978
4 639
7 617
1.99
10.24
6.86
2009-10
3 104
4 894
7 998
4.23
5.52
5.02
2010-11
3 250
4 981
8 231
4.70
1.78
2.91
2011-12
3 372
5294
8 666
3.75
6.28
5.28
2012-13
3 321
5 719
9 040
-1.51
8.03
4.32
2013-14
(P)
3 443
6 136
9 579
3.67
7.29
5.96
P: Provisional
Source: Handbook on Fisheries Statistics (2014), Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries
(DAHD&F), Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
2.5
Fish Production Potential
Maritime States along the west and east coasts of India are implementing closed
season of 45 to 75 days for mechanized fishing vessels as a corollary to their
Marine Fishing Regulation Acts. Earlier there was no uniformity of ban period, but
after the intervention of the Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India, the ban has
been made uniform for 47 days all along the west coast (June 15 – July 31) and
east coast (April 15 – May 31) States and Union Territories.
India’s marine fisheries production has reached a plateau and, at best, only
marginal increase is predicted in the near future. Most major stocks are fully
exploited and further increase has to come from exploitation of deep-sea resources.
Fishing efforts are largely confined to the inshore waters through artisanal,
traditional, mechanized sectors. About 90% of the present production from the
Page 9
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
marine sector is from within a depth range of up to 50 to 70 m and remaining 10%
from depths extending up to 200 m. While 93% of the production is contributed by
artisanal, mechanized and motorized sector, the remaining 7% is contributed by
deep sea fishing fleets confining their operation mainly to the shrimp grounds in
the upper East Coast.
Depth-wise marine fish production potential shows that about 87% of the
resources are available in the 100 m depth zone and only 8% beyond i.e. 100-200
m depth and 200-500 m depth zone. The resources in oceanic area have been
estimated as 5% of the total potential. The oceanic resources largely comprise
yellow fin tuna (80 000 tonnes), skipjack tuna (99 000 tonnes), bigeye tuna (500
tonnes), billfishes (5 900 tonnes), pelagic sharks (20 800 tonnes) and other species
(3 800 tonnes).
2.6
Fish Export and Trend
The fishery sector is a major foreign exchange earner in the Indian economy. The
export touched 983756 tonnes valued Rs.307121.48 crores during 2013-14. During
the previous year, it was 928215 tonnes valued at Rs.18856.26 crores. Since 200910, the marine product exports have crossed US $ 2 billion for the third
consecutive time and during 2013-14, export earnings for the first time in 2013-14
touched US $ 5.0 billion mark registering an increase of 6% in terms of volume
and 60% by value compared to the previous year.
Presently, the global fish trade is estimated over US $ 138 billion. The share of
marine products in total export earnings from India is over 3% of which the share
of frozen shrimp in the export earnings is very high and contributes about 64% of
the total export earnings. While export of fish and shrimp in various forms,
constitutes more than 80% of Indian sea food exports, shrimp alone accounts for
64% of the value of exports. However, the major share of the present export in
volumetric terms is in bulk form while a small share of the exports comprise of
value-added products. The export mainly consisted of frozen Shrimp
(64%)followed by low valued fresh/frozen fin fish varieties (14.2%), frozen
Cephalopods (10.3%) and dried seafood items (3.3%). Southeast Asia including
China was the top most importer of Indian seafood shared close to 46.34% of
export in terms of volume and 32.48% by value followed by USA (11.27% by
volume & 25.63% by value), EU (17.76% by volume & 20.29% by value), Japan
(7.27% by volume &8.15% by value) and Middle East (5.90% by volume &
5.29% by value). There is also growing export of canned and processed fish from
India.
The major change noticed in the export trend, during the year 2013-14 is the
emergence of South East Asia who continued to be the top most importer of
marine products in terms of volume and value followed by USA. The other
individual markets, which increased their shares during 2013-14, are other
countries like Canada, Mauritius, Australia, Switzerland, Maldives, New Zealand,
Page 10
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Reunion, Panama, Venezuela, Taiwan, Bangladesh, Philippines, Turkey and
Malta. The significant development in the expansion of export is the strengthening
of India’s presence in Southeast Asia and USA. These developments in the marine
products export happened despite continuing recession in the international
markets, debt crisis in European Union (EU) economies, continuing antidumping
duty in US and the sluggish growth in US economy and political instability in the
Arab world. The increased production and productivity of shrimps, Littopenaeus
vannamei (white leg shrimp) and Penaeus monodon (black tiger shrimp) and better
price realization of major items like cuttlefish, shrimp and squid helped realizing a
higher export turnover.
Fish Export from India (2004-05 to 2013-14)
Year
Quantity
(tonnes)
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
461 329
512 163
612 643
541 701
602 834
678 436
813 091
862 021
928 214
983 756
Value
Average annual growth
(Rs.in crore)
rate (%)
Quantity
Value
6 646.55
11.97
9.10
7 245.73
11.01
9.01
8 363.52
19.62
15.43
7 620.93
-11.58
-8.88
8 607.95
11.29
12.95
10 048.53
12.54
16.74
12 901.46
19.85
28.39
16 597.24
6.01
28.65
18 856.26
7.68
13.61
30 213.27
5.99
60.23
Source: Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA), Kochi
2.7
Fish Catch Utilisation and Fish Consumption in India
Of the total fish production in the country, over 80% of the fish catch is marketed
as fresh or chilled and forms a staple food in the coastal and inland areas while 6%
goes for drying and curing. Frozen fish production accounts for about 7%, while
6% is reduced to fish meal, and one percent used for other purposes. The fish
canning industry utilises less than one percent of the total catch.Pelagic and midwater species contributed 51.6% of the total fish landings. Although contributing
only 10% of the total marine landings, shrimp is still the most important
commercial variety due to its export potential. According to the National Sample
Survey Organisation (NSSO), the annual per capita fish consumption was 2.45 kg
in 1983; it increased to 3.45 kg in 1999-2000. Only 35% population in India was
estimated to be fish eater and their annual per capita fish consumption was 9.8 kg
in 1999-2000. The lower fish consumption is also on account of restricted food
habits.
Page 11
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER-3
OVERVIEW OF ANDHRA PRADESH FISHERY SECTOR
3.1
General
Andhra Pradesh has a coastline of 974 km with the continental shelf area covering
over 33,227 sq. km, is situated on the East coast of India. It is located between Lat.
13o 40’ N and 19o N and Long. 80o E and 85o E. Andhra Pradesh has some of the
important ports in the country and is thus of great importance with regards to
trade. Fishery harbours have been developed at five places i.e. Visakhapatnam,
Kakinada, Nizampatnam, Machilipatnam and Bhavanapadu and they cater to the
requirements of about 1545 mechanised fishing vessels. Still a large number of
MFVs are operating without any landing, berthing and outfitting facilities. Out of
the above mentioned five fishery harbours, the Bhavanapadu fishery harbour has
become defunct due to large scale siltation at the entrance of the river mouth.
As per 2011 Census, United Andhra Pradesh has a population of 8.46 Crore, an
increase from figure of 7.62 Crore in 2001 census. Total population of Andhra
Pradesh is 84,580,777 of which male and female are 42,442,146 and 42,138,631
respectively. In 2001, total population was 76,210,007 in which males were
38,527,413 while females were 37,682,594. The total population growth in this
decade was 10.98 % while in previous decade it was 13.86 %. The population of
Andhra Pradesh forms about 7 % of India in 2011. In 2001, the figure was about
7.4 %. Literacy rate in Andhra Pradesh has seen upward trend and is 67.02 percent
as per 2011 population census and it is a cause for concern and male literacy
stands at 74.88 % while female literacy is at 58.68%.
Page 12
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Total area of United Andhra Pradesh is 275,045 sq. km. Density of Andhra
Pradesh is 308 per sq km which is lower than national average of 382 per sq km.
Details of 2011 census in respect to the State have been furnished below:
Table - 1
2011 Census abstract of United Andhra Pradesh State
Description
2011
2001
Total Population
84,580,777 76,210,007
Male
42,442,146 38,527,413
Female
42,138,631 37,682,594
Population Growth
10.98%
13.86%
Density/km2
308
277
Area km2
275,045
275,045
Child Population (0-6 Age) 9,142,802 10,171,857
Literacy
67.02%
60.47%
Male Literacy
74.88%
71.16%
Female Literacy
58.68%
50.29%
Out of total population of United Andhra Pradesh, 33.36% people live in urban
regions. The total figure of population living in urban areas is 28,219,075 of which
14,198,905 are males and remaining 14,020,170 are females. Andhra Pradesh is
divided into three regions i.e. Coastal Andhra, Rayalaseema and Telangana.

Coastal Andhra comprises 9 districts of Srikakulam, Vizianagaram,
Visakhapatnam, East Godavari, West Godavari, Krishna, Guntur, Prakasam
and Nellore.

Rayalaseema comprises 4 districts of Anantapur, Chittoor, Cuddapah and
Kurnool.

Telangana consists 10 districts of Hyderabad, Adilabad, Khammam,
Karimnagar, Mahbubnagar, Medak, Nalgonda, Nizamabad, Rangareddy
and Warangal.
Page 13
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Table – 2
Region & District-Wise population of united Andhra Pradesh
as per 2011 census
Name of the District
Coastal Andhra
1. East Godavari
2. Guntur
3. Krishna
4. Visakhapatnam
5. West Godavari
6. Prakasam
7. Nellore
8. Srikakulam
9.Vizianagaram
Rayalaseema
1. Kurnool
2. Anantapur
3. Cuddapah
4. Chittoor
Telangana
1. Rangareddy
2. Mahbubnagar
3. Hyderabad
4. Karimnagar
5. Warangal
6. Nalgonda
7. Medak
8. Khammam
9. Adilabad
10. Nizamabad
3.2
Population Male
Female
5,154,296
4,887,813
4,517,398
4,290,589
3,936,966
3,397,448
2,963,557
2,703,114
2,344,474
2,569,688
2,440,521
2,267,375
2,138,910
1,964,918
1,714,764
1,492,974
1,341,738
1,161,477
2,584,608
2,447,292
2,250,023
2,151,679
1,972,048
1,682,684
1,470,583
1,361,376
1,182,997
4,053,463
4,081,148
2,882,469
4,174,064
2,039,227
2,064,495
1,451,777
2,090,204
2,014,236
2,016,653
1,430,692
2,083,860
5,296,741
4,053,028
3,943,323
3,776,269
3,512,576
3,488,809
3,033,288
2,797,370
2,741,239
2,551,335
2,701,008
2,050,386
2,018,575
1,880,800
1,759,281
1,759,772
1,523,030
1,390,988
1,369,597
1,250,641
2,595,733
2,002,642
1,924,748
1,895,469
1,753,295
1,729,037
1,510,258
1,406,382
1,371,642
1,300,694
Socio- economic schemes for the welfare of fishermen community
Andhra Pradesh is undertaking every effort for the Socio-economic development
of the poor fishermen community and the following are the few schemes.
•
Subsidy for the motorisation of the traditional craft & Tax free diesel
to mechanised boats and country craft.
•
National Savings-cum-relief scheme for fishermen.
•
Fishing ban period relief for fishermen family & Bio-matric ID
cards.
Page 14
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
•
3.3
Insuring the life of the fishermen under group accident scheme and
insurance coverage for the individual fishermen.
Need to Develop Fishery Harbour at Juvvaladinne Nellore District
There is a need to develop fishery harbour due to the non-availability of fullfledged infrastructure facilities at the site. Juvvaladinne site is situated on the bay
like coast and fishermen are facing difficult in navigating at the mouth.
Mechanised fishing boats of the area in and around Juvvaladinne operating
elsewhere in the State due to non-availability of berthing and landing facilities.
Motorised and traditional boats are operating at the site. Once the fishery harbour
is developed at Juvvaladinne 12 metre and 15 metre mechanised fishing vessels
can go for 30 and 25 trips in a fishing season consisting 6 and 8 days per trip
respectively. They can land about 40 and 60 tonnes per year respectively. 9 metre
motorised boat goes for 2 days per trip and 100 trips in a fishing season and lands
250 kg per trip. 24 M Tuna Long Liner is expected to go for 25 trips of 8 dys
duration and it would be landing 5000 kg per trip. Development of a fishery
harbour at Juvvaladinne is sure to generate more employment opportunities for the
local unemployed people and the fishermen community. A large number of
workers in the fishery harbour are from the fisher community comprising of boat
crew, head-load and ice workers, women fish vendors, fish merchants etc.
3.4
Design Fleet Size
In order to decide the design fleet size for the project, the economic investigation
team visited the site and held discussions with the officers of the Fisheries
Department of Andhra Pradesh and stakeholders regarding the number of fishing
vessels operating from Nellore District and the total number of fishing vessels for
which the fishery harbour has to be designed. Further, the Fisheries Department
has provided the fishing vessels’ statistics during the economic investigations.
Accordingly, itis suggested after stakeholders meeting that the fishing harbour
could be designed for a total fishing fleet of 1250 vessels comprising 1000
numbers of 9 metre motorissed, 100 numbers each of 12 & 15 metre mechanised
fishing vessels and 50 numbers of 24 metre tuna Long Liners which was also
concurred by the Commisioner of Fisheries, Govt. of Andhra Pradesh. The details
of the fleet using the harbour such as number of boats, their overall length, annual
average landing, duration of each fishing trip etc. are given in Table.
Page 15
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Fishing Vessel, Duration of trips and Landings
in respect of the proposed Juvvaladinne Fishery harbour
1
Type & Size of the Vessel
Motorised
9 Metre
2
Days per Trip
3
Gill
Tuna
Trawler
Netter
Long Line
12 Metre 15 Metre 24 Metre
2
6
8
8
Total Number of Trips
100
30
25
25
4
Total fishing Days
200
180
200
200
5
Rest Days
70
90
70
70
6
Fishing Season Days
270
270
270
270
7
Landings per Trip
(Qty. in kg)
250
1,333
2,400
5,000
8
Landings per Season
(Qty.in ton)
25
40
60
125
9
Total Number of Vessels
1000
100
100
50
10 Total Landings in Tonnes
25,000
4,000
6,000
6,250
Page 16
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER-4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
4.1
Introduction
This Chapter summarises the main features of the project proposal. The text
should be read in conjunction with the Appendices attached to this part of the
report. To facilitate presentation of essential features of the project, brief tables are
incorporated in the text. These are used simply to highlight indispensable elements
and to reduce, where appropriate, the need for lengthy textual explanations.
4.2
Time – Scale
The project described in this report is based on certain assumptions about "time".
It may be seen that in some of the Appendices, the time-cale commences with year
'0'. As it is unknown at this stage (June 2017) as to when the harbour works will be
completed or advanced to a point, when it would be practicable for fishing vessels
to use facilities, year '0' has been chosen to cover the indefinite period of time
elapsing between project formulation and commissioning of the harbour. During
the period year '0', it is assumed that the existing fishing operations will continue
in the present manner and mechanised fishing vessels would come and operate at
the fishery harbour. However some expansion and reorganisation may occur due to
harbour construction.
By the time the harbour development is complete, the existing fishing vessels will
continue fishing operations. During year '0' those concerned with shore-based
activities may construct facilities such as ice plants, cold storage etc. to meet the
needs of the total fishing fleet. The project ' time-scale' therefore, covers two time
divisions. Firstly, an indefinite period of time covered by the concept of year '0'
and secondly, definite period of 14 years have been taken for evaluation. The
project as cast in the report reaches maximum efficiency and the level of
stabilisation in the first year itself. Table 4-1 outlines the relationship between
“time" and "project implementation".
Table 4-1
Project Activity
Project formulation, preparation of tenders, securing of official
sanctions, tendering, etc.
Harbour under construction
Building of shore-based facilities, if any, during later part of
year
Harbour commissioned
Project reaches maximum efficiency and period of
stabilisation
Time – Year
"0"
"0"
"0"
1
1
Page 17
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Period for economic evaluation
4.3
"0" to 14
Fleet Size
The harbour has been designed to accommodate 1250 fishing vessels comprising
1000 numbers of 9 metre motorissed, 100 numbers each of 12 & 15 metre
mechanised fishing vessels and 50 numbers of 24 metre Tuna Long Liners besides
500 numbers of Non-Motoirised boats. Appendix 1 gives details of the fishing
fleet. All the fishing vessels are already in operation in the vicinity of Juvvaladinne
fishery centre while MFVs belonging to this area and operating elsewhere in the
State are expected to come and operate from Juvvaladinne FH and no new fishing
vessels are proposed to be added to the existing fleet. The fishing vessels, which
may cease operation due to old age and major repairs, are expected to be replaced
by new ones in the normal process by the vessel owners.
4.4
Fishing Operations
The 9 m motorised craft would undertake 100 trips of two days duration, 12 m gill
netter and 15 metre trawlers undertake 30 trips of 6 days duration and 25 trips of 8
days duration respectively in a fishing season spread over nine months. 24 mete
Tuna Long Liner undertakes 25 trips of 8 days duratipn in a fishing season. The
operational schedule for each type of fishing vessel is shown in section 2.0 of
Appendix 3.
4.5
Catch Composition and Vessel Landings
Appendix 2, for each type of fishing vessel, contains information about the
composition of landings on a seasonal basis. Obviously, landings will not be
constant on a year-to-year basis. Hence, the data included in Appendix 2 represent
averages over the time span of project evaluation. The basis for the estimate is
essentially the existing effort and some expectations in future after harbour
construction.
Throughout the Appendices attached to the report, reference is made to various
classes of fish and prawns for example, Prawns - Class 1, Fish - Class 4 etc. Class
1 prawn would be around 40 to 45 counts whereas Class 2 & 3 prawns would be
around 70 to 80 counts & more than 100 counts respectively. In the case of fish,
Class 1 is high quality fish while Class 2 & 3 are medium quality fish and Class 4
is low quality or trash fish. Tuna also included in the fish classes. All the Class I
Prawns and Fish are exported while 50% of Prawns Class 2 and 70% of Fish Class
2 is beeing exported. 50% of Prawns class 3 is considered for export. The
Department of Fisheries has identified about 50 species of fish and prawns of
commercial importance, which may be taken from the waters off Juvvaladinne
fishery centre. To include detailed accounts, from a catch composition point of
view, of all such species, would involve unnecessary space in report presentation.
Hence to facilitate evaluation procedure, a simple grading system (based on boat-
Page 18
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
side price) has been adopted. The resultant class/price relationship is shown in
Table 4-2.
Table 4-2
Grade
Prawns
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Fish
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
Price
(Rs./kg)
Range Average
(Rs./kg)
600-400
350-250
120-80
500
300
100
170-130
120-80
70-50
25-35
150
100
60
30
Price
As mentioned earlier, the catch composition and landings per season for each type
of fishing vessel are shown in Appendix 2. The quantity and value (boat-side) of
landings on an annual basis for each type of fishing vessel is briefly summarised in
Table 4-3.
Table 4-3
Item
Prawns
Landings (kg)
Value (Rs)
Fish
Landings (kg)
Value (Rs)
Total Fish and Prawns
Landings (kg)
Value (Rs.)
Fishing Vessels
9 m OBM 12 m GN 15 m Trawler 24 m TLL
1,250
1,75,000
-
9,000
24,60,000
-
23,750
40,000
12,25,000 26,60,000
51,000
125,000
40,20,000 102,50,000
25,000
40,000
14,00,000 26,60,000
125,000
60,000
64,80,000 102,50,000
Total landings and value (boatside) per year for the period of staged development
are summarised in Table 4-4. The landings and value given in the Table would
more or less be same throughout the project evaluation period.
Page 19
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Table 4-4
Item
9M
Prawns
Landings (tonne)
Value (Rs. In Lakhs)
Fish
Landings (tonne)
Value (Rs. In Lakhs)
Total Fish and Prawns
Landings (tonne)
Value (Rs. In Lakhs)
Fishing Vessel
12 M 15 M 24 M TOTAL
1,250
1,750
900
- 2,460
2,150
4,210
23,750 4,000 5,100 6,250
12,250 2,660 4,020 5,125
39,100
24,055
25,000 4,000 6,000 6,250
14,000 2,660 6,480 5,125
41,250
28,265
Table 4-5 shows the relative importance of each class of prawns and fish in
relation to total landings of the fleet and total value of boatside sales. The
percentages given cover the period for any year from years 1-14.
Table 4-5
Item
Prawns Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Total
Fish
Class 1
Class 2
Class 3
Class 4
Total
Total fish and prawns
4.6
Landings
Quantity (%)
Value (%)
0.58
4.25
1.33
5.84
3.30
4.81
5.21
14.89
8.78
19.21
15.86
23.15
27.48
24.07
42.67
18.68
94.79
85.11
100.00
100.00
Sea-going personnel
Crew
Skipper 1st
Skipper 2nd
Deckhands
9 m OBM
Per Total
vessel fleet
1 1000
3 3000
Table 4-6
12 m GN
Per
Total
vessel
fleet
1
100
1
100
6
600
15 m Trawler
Per
Total
vessel
fleet
1
100
1
100
6
600
15 m Trawler
Per
Total
vessel
fleet
1
50
1
50
8
400
Page 20
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Total
4
4000
8
800
8
800
10
500
The crew members of all the three type fishing vessels are paid their wages on
monthly for 10 months except 9 M OBM crew get 60% of net after deducting fuel,
food and ice while 12 m GN, 15 m and 24 m crew get monthly salary. The details
of wages have been given in the following Table 4-7.
Table 4-7
9 m OBM
12 m GN
15 m Trawler
24 m TLL
Rs. 3,36,600 Rs. 4,70,000
Rs. 6,40,000 Rs. 36,00,000
In addition to their share, the vessel owner spends about Rs.80,000, Rs.90,000
Rs.100,000 and Rs.1,00,000 for 9 m OBM, 12 m GN, 15 m Trawler and 24 m
Tuna Long Liner respectively towards the cost of food for the crew members in a
fishing season.
4.7
Shore-based facilities
The cost estimate for the harbour complex (Rs.24,222 lakhs) contained in
Appendix 8 of this report includes inter-alia provision for breakwaters, dredging,
reclamation and levelling, revetment with stone pitching, fish handling and auction
hall, RC sloping hard, fishery administrative building, fishermen gear shed,
fishermen rest shed, net mending shed, restaurant, dormitory for fish merchants,
public toilet block, boat repair shop, security/guard house, compound wall and
main gate, radio-communication tower etc.
The existing capacity of ice plants in and around Nellore is not sufficient, therefore
10 tonne ice plant with 20 tonne cold storage has been proposed and the cost has
been included in cash outflow. In addition, the fish merchants are themselves
bringing ice when they buy fish at boatside. The recommended capacity for this
facility have been established on the basis of the total landings shown in Appendix
1 and the assumptions about marketing of fish and prawn products listed in
Appendix 4. The total capacity of ice plants required to meet the needs of the
fishery industry at Juvvaladinne has been estimated at 230 tonne/day and ice &
fish storage capacity of 460 tonnes. The reconciliation of these estimates and
assumption is contained in Appendix 6.
4.8
Transport
The fishery harbour development project outlined in this report does not include
any capital investment on trucks to move fish products to inland markets. To do
so, would result in unused capacity during off-season or poor fishing season. It is
assumed that road transport will be hired and further supplemented by rail service.
The hinterland of the project area has a fairly good network of all-weather roads
Page 21
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
and vehicular transport is possible throughout the year. The hiring of transport
may perhaps present some difficulties during peak landing periods and the existing
ice plants and chilled fish storage capacities would take care of the excess catches.
The cost of transport is shown in Appendices 7(a) and 7(c). The amounts shown
make no provision for income, which may be earned by a truck-owner for either
forward or back loading, as the case may be. With respect to overseas shipment of
frozen products, it is assumed that this will take place from Chennai Port. In
Appendix 7(a), under the heading "Transport to Market or Shipside", an amount of
Rs.1,000 per tonne of product is charged. This estimate includes transport and
lighterage, if applicable.
4.9
Marketing
Appendices 4 and 5 give details of the basic assumptions covering the disposal of
landings (raw material) and allocation of products to various markets.
In Appendices 4 to 7 (c) inclusive and Appendix 10, market areas are shown as
"Export", "Local” “Inland” and "Howrah/Chennai". The export market is any
place outside India. The local market area comprises towns and villages, within 30
km from the fishery harbour. The figure of 30 km is chosen, because it roughly
represents the distance a bicycle/moped vendor travels with his baskets, in order to
catch an evening market. Inland markets are those places towards hinterland of the
fishery harbour. For the purpose of transport costs, it is assumed that the average
distance between the fishery harbour and the inland markets is around 450 km,
though some consignments may be sent to much shorter distances than the figure
indicated. The relative importance of each market area with respect to sales can be
seen in Table 4-8.
Table 4-8
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage
raw material product weight total product
intake
sold
sales
Export
20.20
18.22
44.53
Local
16.01
16.42
10.42
Inland
31.63
32.34
22.02
Howrah/Chennai
32.16
33.02
23.03
100.00
100.00
100.00
Total
Market
The price range and the weighted average price per kilogram for prawn and fish
products are given in Table 4-9.
Page 22
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Table 4-9
Product
Prawns
Frozen
Fresh
Fish
Frozen
Fresh
Dried/Cured
4.10
Price range Weighted average price (Rs/kg)
(Rs./kg)
Retail or FOB
261 – 904
106 – 334
494.03
162.97
187 - 237
32 - 114
107 – 113
214.92
62.16
111.80
Ownership and Management
4.10.1 Fishery Harbour
It is assumed that the Department of Fisheries (DOF), Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
(GOAP) will be responsible for:
a)
the control of fishing vessels using the harbour to ensure maximum
benefit from the space available; and
b)
the overall supervision and maintenance of facilities and amenities
provided at the fishery harbour.
•
The DOF, GOAP, should make adequate arrangements for the
proper management and utilisation of the facilities created. Except under
emergency circumstances during natural calamities etc. the facilities should
not be used for any purposes other than fishing and fishery related
activities. Any use of the land reclaimed during construction, building etc.,
for purpose other than fisheries related activities should be undertaken only
in a way which is not detrimental to the interest of the fishing community.
Any income generated by way of lease rent, license fee should be deposited
in the Bank Account maintained for depositing the user charges as
mentioned in the Para three below.
•
The DOF, GOAP, shall formulate a policy for management of the
harbour and will have authority to privatise the management, maintenance
and operation of the facilities created. For the management, the DOF,
GOAP, can give the function to an autonomous body body or perform the
function through a registered Society which may manage the Juvvaladinne
Page 23
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
FH by formulating suitable hire charges and fixed lease rent for both the
buildings and land.
•
The revenue generated out of the lease rent, user charges will be
deposited in an account to be maintained in a scheduled nationalised bank
situated in the area. The amount realised, will be used for day-to-day
operation, management, maintenance, expansion, repair/renovation and
modernisation of fishery harbour.
•
The DOF, GOAP, will provide the additional funds if needed, over
and above the user charges collected by the Society and required for
maintenance function. The Government of India will not bear any
operational cost to be incurred for maintenance of the harbour. The Society
that will manage the harbour will include, at least one representative each
from DOF, GOAP, fishermen association, fishing vessel operators and
Department of Ports. Other officers shall, be as decided by the DOF,
GOAP.
•
The DOF, GOAP, will ensure the efficient operational conditions of
the fishery harbour in accordance with the hygienic standards/specifications
in force from time to time. The Chairman or the Engineer of the DOF,
GOAP, will review the maintenance, management and operation of the
fishery harbour annually.
It is further assumed that within a short time after the harbour becomes effective, a
Fisheries Terminal Organisation (FTO) would be established under the Indian
Companies Act, to ensure that the essential shore facilities and services are made
available to both fishermen and processors in the fishery harbour. The FTO would
also operate the fish auction hall, introduce fish auctioning system and ensure that
accurate statistical records of catches are maintained. In addition, FTO would also
look after the maintenance and functioning of net mending shed/gear shed and rest
shed provided for the fishermen within the fishery harbour complex.
The Fishery Administrative office would serve as a headquarters for the Harbour
Officer in charge of the port. It could also accommodate fishery personnel, who
may be assigned to the project to supervise or watch over progress with respect to
fishery resources, technology and economics.
The Commissioner of Fisheries, Government of Andhra Pradesh is responsible for
implementing fishery welfare schemes, registration of MFVs, issue of diesel,
ensuring smooth functioning of fishery harbour etc. Further, he may also be
entrusted to operate the fish auction hall, introduce fish auctioning system by a
separate set of staff as shown in Table 4.15 and ensure that accurate statistical
records of catches are maintained. In addition, he will also look after the
maintenance and functioning of net mending shed/gear shed and rest shed and
other facilities provided for the fishermen within the harbour complex.
Page 24
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
4.10.2
Fishing Vessels
All the 9 m, 12 m, 15 m and 24 m fishing vessels are owned and operated by
individual, family or cooperative basis. The range of investment for these vessels
is shown in Table 4 -10.
Table 4-10
(Rupees)
Item
Fishing vessel
Fishing gear
Total Investment
4.10.3
9M
12 M
2,00,000 26,00,000
1,00,000 4,00,000
3,00,000 30,00,000
15 M
24 M
40,00,000 80,00,000
10,00,000 20,00,000
50,00,000 100,00,000
FishAuction hall, Net mending shed, Gear shed, Rest shed, Ice
plant and Coldstorage
As mentioned earlier, it is envisaged that an FTO will operate and manage the fish
auction hall, net mending shed, gear sheds, rest sheds etc. As regards the other
shore-establishments, they could also be well run by fishing boat owners' cooperative societies. As the range of industrial activities recommended in this report
is not sophisticated and in fact, all are currently being, or have been, undertaken
somewhere along the coastline, the suggestion is not unrealistic. The economies
from the financial point-of-view of one management are obvious. Apart from
monetary savings, single ownership gives a much better chance of ensuring that
facilities and services are programmed on a coordinated basis to meet within
season fluctuations in landings. In addition, with control over processing,
distribution etc., boat owners would achieve better profits and so avoid
exploitation by middlemen who often for very little effort or risk, reap the major
financial rewards.
4.11
Investment
4.11.1 Fixed Assets
The scale and timing of investment (new funds) required to implement the fishery
development project outlined in this Chapter is indicated in Appendix 8. The
investment in the development of Juvvaladinne fishery harbour is Rs.24,222
lakhs occur mostly in Year "0" i.e., Rs. 21,799.80 lakhs, but an amount of Rs.
2,422.20 lakhs is shown in Year 1 to cover final bills, retention money etc. Since
all the boats are existing, hence, no new investments are required for fishing
vessels. However, for evaluation purpose, the fishing vessels investment has been
accounted for under year '0'.
Page 25
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
1000 nos. x Rs. 3.00 lakhs
100 nos. x Rs. 30.00 lakhs
100 nos. x Rs. 50.00 lakhs
50 nos. x Rs.100.00 lakhs
= Rs.3,000 lakhs
= Rs.3,000 lakhs
= Rs.5,000 lakhs
= Rs 5,000 lakhs
Total = Rs.16,000 lakhs
Total investment (Rs.40,422 lakhs) is made up as follows:
Table 4 -11
Total investment
Percentage of
(Rs. in lakhs)
Total investment
Item
Fishing vessels
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
Sub-total
Fishery harbour
Shore-establishments
Pre-development expenditure
Total
3000
3000
5000
5000
16000
24222
180
20
40422
7.42
7.42
12.37
12.37
39.58
59.92
0.45
0.05
100.00
The amount of investment required each year is shown in Table 4-12. As the
MFVs are already in operation, no new investment is required. Hence, the
additional investments required are for only fishery harbour, shore establishments
and pre-development expenditure.
Table 4 – 12
Year
"0"
1
Total
Investment in fixed assets
(Rs. in lakhs)
21,999.80
2,422.20
24,422.00
Percentage of
Total investment
90.08
9.92
100.00
4.11.2 Operating Capital
No additional capacities in respect of processing industries have been suggested as
the existing capacity available in Nellore district and nearby areas are expected to
Page 26
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
absorb the prawn and fish landings for processing and export as is being done
now. Hence, no operating capital for fishing vessels or cost of interest on operating
capital for processing plants is considered for economic evaluation.
4.12
Government Revenue and Expenditure
In this report, no detailed analysis has been made to establish the amount of
revenue which will accrue to the Government from levying of income tax, sales
tax, excise duty etc. In section 4.10 of this Chapter, some observations are made
on "Ownership and Management" aspects. If the DOF, GOAP elects either in the
short or long term to run the project as a public sector enterprise, then the project's
profits will flow to COF, GOAP revenue. On the other hand, if it is the COF,
GOAP's policy to encourage fishermen and others to be responsible for project
implementation, then the COF, GOAP’s opportunity for direct revenue from the
project, apart from indirect revenue, which may flow from taxes etc., is limited to
harbour fees, rent charged for gear sheds, rent paid by the users of the fish auction
hall and fees paid by those, who may lease land, in order to build ice plants and
fish storage etc.
If the COF, GOAP decides to control the boatside sale of fish and prawns, then it
will be entitled to all the commission chargeable on such sales. In this report, it is
assumed that all landings of fish and prawns will be liable to commission, whether
those are sold by auction or not. If all sales take place in the fish auction hall, there
will be no difficulty in deducting commission. However, problems may arise, if
some quantity of fish is sold by auction and the rest by private deals. Hence, if the
COF, GOAP chooses to run an orderly auction system, with a fair sharing of all
monetary benefits, it must insist that all landings pass through the fish auction hall,
or some other checking point, so that commission can be assessed and reasonable
deductions made from payments due to boat owners.
On the basis of information contained in item 5.07 of Appendix 3, the total amount
of commission payable on boatside sales by owners of fishing vessels will be of
the order as shown in Table 4- 13.
Table 4-13
Item
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
Total
Commission payable by
each fishing vessel per year 42,000 79,800 1,94,400 3,07,500
(Rs.lakhs)
Number of fishing vessels
1000
100
100
50
1250
Total amount payable by
420.00 79.80
194.40
153.7 847.95
fishing fleet-(Rs.lakhs)
Page 27
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
As indicated in the opening paragraph of this Section of the report, the COF,
GOAP will be entitled to collect harbour dues from vessel owners. Section 5.0 of
Appendix 3 (Vessel operating costs) includes these charges and the amount for 9
M OBM, 12 M, 15 M and 24 M are respectively Rs.50,000, Rs.30,000, Rs.50,000
and Rs.75,000 per annum. The total collections accruing to the COF, GOAP from
year 1 onwards are shown in Table 9-14. Collection of harbour dues from the
fishing vessels would amount to Rs.580 lakhs from year 1 onwards.
Table 4-14
Item
Harbour Dues
Total Collection
Vessel
Class
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
Number of
Vessels
1000
100
100
50
1250
Rate
(Rs.)
50000
30000
50000
75000
-
Total
(Rs. in lakhs)
500.00
30.00
50.00
37.50
617.50
The COF, GOAP will certainly wish to manage the fishery harbour. If it also
decides to run the fish auction hall, net mending shed and gear shed, either as a
Departmental or Corporate activity, a separate establishment, staff, temporary
labour etc., will have to be provided in addition to those people, whose task it
would be to carry out the functions of harbour management outlined in paragraphs
(a) and (b) of sub-section 4.10.1 of this Chapter.
The cost of harbour management and maintenance has been assessed at Rs.150.00
lakhs and Rs.484.44 lakhs respectively per year from year 1 onwards. The
"Management" expenditure covers salaries of Harbour Officer, Harbour Engineer,
Clerical assistance, Watchman, temporary labour, staff for gear shed, overheads,
excluding maintenance and depreciation. Harbour maintenance has been treated as
a separate item, and it is assumed that most, if not all of this work will be done
under contract. The rate of expenditure on maintenance is based on a percentage of
the total cost of the harbour works, fish auction hall, net mending shed/gear shed,
rest shed, etc.the rate is 2% of harbour cost i.e.,Rs.484.44 lakhs per year from year
1 onwards.
The COF, GOAP’s control of fish auction hall, net mending shed/gear and rest
shed will involve substantial expenditure with respect to salaries for a permanent
staff, wages for temporary or seasonal labour, expendable equipment, general
working expenses, etc. Table 4-15 summarises the sort of expenditure, which
might be incurred, if the COF, GOAP accepts the responsibility of conducting an
auction system. The estimates given relate to year 1 and onwards.
Page 28
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Table 4-15
Item
Manager
Wharf Superintendent
Fish Auction hall Superintendent (a)
Accountant
Fish Auctioneer (b)
Fish Auctioneer’s Clerk
Cashier
Statistical Assistant
Clerk/Typist
Foreman(C)
Peon
Watchman
Sub total
Temporary Labour (d)
Sub total
Add: 10% for contingencies
Sub total
Provision for equipment(e)
General expenses (f)
Total expenditure
Number of
persons
1
1
1
2
5
5
5
3
3
2
3
3
34
Cost from
Year 1 onwards (Rs.)
12,00,000
6,00,000
6,00,000
6,00,000
12,00,000
12,00,000
12,00,000
9,00,000
9,00,000
6,00,000
6,00,000
6,00,000
102,00,000
18,60,000
120,60,000
12,06,000
132,66,000
10,00,000
7,34,000
150,00,000
Note:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
In-charge of delivery of fish from boat side to fish auction hall
and clearance after sales.
Selling rate assumed to be 10 tonne per hour
In-charge of temporary labour gangs, which would be
responsible for cartage of fish and cleaning fish auction hall
after selling periods.
Cost of temporary labour assessed on a basis of Rs. 30 per
tonne of fish in and out of fish auction hall.
Nominal sum to cover fish auction hall equipment, boxes etc
(this relates to the expenditure in Year 1).
To cover office expenditure, printing, water, electricity etc.
Table 4-15 gives a consolidated statement of revenue and expenditure for
combined operations of harbour management and the running of the fish auction
hall, net mending shed, gear shed and rest shed. The statement also includes
Page 29
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
provisions for maintenance of all facilities and depreciation. The cost of
depreciation is taken at 2% of total investment in the harbour and its associated
facilities (2% of Rs.24,222 lakhs = Rs.484.44 lakhs).
Table 4-16
Item
Years 1-14
Fish auction hall
Revenue from commission
847.95
Less expenditure on Salaries, Wages, overheads
150.00
Surplus
697.95
Port management
Revenue from Port fees and rampway charges
617.50
Less expenditure on Salaries, wages, overheads
150.00
Maintenance
484.44
Deficit
(-)16.94
Consolidated statement for fish auction hall and port
management
Surplus: Fish auction hall
697.95
Surplus: Port management
(-) 16.94
Total combined operations: Deficit
681.01
It may be seen from Table 9-16 that surplus will occur from year 1 onwards on an
annual basis on combined operations of fish auction hall and harbour management.
The cumulative deficit at the end of 14th year of the project will amount to
Rs.9,534.14 lakhs which would be about 40.13% of the fishery harbour cost.
Page 30
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER – 5
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
5.1
Introduction
The purpose of project economic evaluation is to describe, assess the project
benefits, backed up, as far as possible, with the quantified results from the
economic analyses. This economic evaluation based on life-cycle costing aims at
identifying and valuing the costs and benefits accruing over the project life. Here,
the project life referred to its economic service life during which time the project
remained relatively maintenance-free, while maintaining an appropriate service
and safety level. The project life considered for the purpose of economic
evaluation of this project is 14 years, although economic life of fishery
harbourfacilities like RCC jetties and the shore based buildings under normal use
and maintenance may have life longer than 14 years.
As part of project economic evaluation, financial analyses of the costs and income
of the project are represented as financial statements (cash inflow/outflow). For
this, all the physical inputs such as civil works (buildings and infrastructure),
equipment etc., required over the project’s economic life period are phased out and
then costed on an annual basis, in present day prices. All these costs and benefits
are converted into current prices by applying discount rates. Price contingencies
for inflation are not included in cash flows (although they may form part of project
budget estimates) as the analysis is undertaken in current prices.
5.2
Economic Analysis
The first step in the preparation of economic analysis is to estimate the capital and
operating costs of the project. Estimation of the capital costs include investment to
be made in the fishery harbour facilities and associated infrastructure, timing of
the capital costs over the life of the project, renewal and replacement costs of
fishing boats, if the project’s life is extended beyond the average economical life,
machinery, equipment, shore based facilities, investment made in fishing vessels,
ice plants, fish processing plants etc.
Secondly, estimation of the annual operating costs of the project include fishing
vessel operating costs (costs of fuel, maintenance of vessel and engine, salaries for
crew, ice, commission on sale of fish landings, harbour dues, fish landing and
wharfage charges, insurance, interest & loan instalment including fishery harbour
management and maintenance, costs of fish processing, distribution and
marketing, fishery harbour management and maintenance.
Finally, estimation of income for the project is made based on the average annual
fish landings and value for each size and type of fishing vessels and the number of
fishing boats which are already in operation and the new vessels proposed to be
Page 31
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
introduced during project development. After estimating the cash inflow and
outflow of the project, annual surplus is calculated by subtracting the capital costs
and operating costs from the income year by year for the assumed economic life of
the project. During the first one or two years, the profit could be negative for some
of the projects; thereafter it will be positive during the rest of the project life. The
annual surplus will be discounted to the project’s present value. The discount rate
would reflect the rate of return that one might reasonably expect to be best
alternative investment of comparable risk. Sensitivity analyses are done to allow
for risks and uncertainty inherent in the project by putting the project into several
sensitivity tests like assuming lower level of fish landings by about 20%
(consequently reducing the fishing vessel/project’s income), increasing the capital
investment costs by about 25% etc.
5.2.1 Economic Evaluation Methods
Several methods are available to evaluate the projects for taking investment
decisions and it may be emphasised here that these methods are only tools for
decision making. The methods most widely used to appraise and compare the
economic feasibility of investment are the Pay-back Period method, the Average
Rate of Return method and the Discounting method. The last method is also called
Present Value method and it includes the Net Present Value (NPV), the Internal
Rate of Return (IRR) and the Benefit-Cost Ratio methods. IRR is the most useful
measure of the economic feasibility of investment and it is widely used by the
international banks such as ADB, World Banketc., including organisations like
FAO/UNDP.
5.2.1.1
Net Present Value Method
In order to use this method, costs have to be subtracted from the benefits (income)
on a year to year basis throughout project’s life to arrive at the net benefit or
surplus. The annual net benefits are discounted to a pre-determined discount rate
or the interest rate on loan. The net present value can also be calculated by
separately discounting the stream of annual cash inflow and cash outflow and
subtracting the latter from the former. The discounting will be made by the
Discounting Table. If the NPV is more than zero, the investment would be
profitable, if it is less than zero, the project would not be profitable and if it is
equal to zero then the project is at break-even.
5.2.1.2
Benefit Cost Ratio Method
Benefit Cost Ratio can be defined as the ratio of the total present value of the
benefits to the costs. The benefit cost ratio can be done by two methods i) by
discounting the stream of benefits and costs separately or ii) by discounting the net
benefits which are arrived by subtracting the costs from the benefits. If the benefit
cost ratio is greater than one, then the project may be considered as economically
feasible.
Page 32
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
5.2.1.3
Internal Rate of Return Method
While applying the present value and benefit cost ratio methods, one may
encounter the problem regarding choosing the appropriate rate of discount. The
method that avoids this difficulty is the internal rate of return. The internal rate of
return on an investment is the discount rate that makes the future net cash flow
equal to zero. It represents the average earning power of the money invested in the
project over the project’s life. If the IRR is greater than the opportunity cost of the
capital, or the interest rate at which funds were borrowed, then the investment is
considered to be feasible. In the present project, the Financial Internal Rate of
Return (FIRR) is worked out by following the discounted cash flow method.
5.3
Assumptions of a General Nature
The average prices of fish and prawns prevailed during 2015 have been used to
calculate the operating results of fishing vessels (Appendix 3) and to calculate unit
costs of fish processing, distribution and marketing of fish and prawn products
(Appendix 7(a). Up-to-date costing has also been applied to investment in fixed
assets (Appendix 8). From the point of income, boatside prices for landings
(Appendix 2), and retail or boatside prices for marketing (Appendices 7(b) and
10), in year 2017 have also been taken as the base.
The problem of ownership is not a critical one from the point of the economic
analysis contained in this Chapter. In Section 4.10 of Chapter 4, certain
observations were made about ownership and management. Firm
recommendations in these matters are outside the scope of this report. Therefore,
only a framework of ownership has been suggested to give a general background
to the development proposal. An important assumption about ownership is that it
will be linked with efficient management, both at sea and onshore. The
construction of a fishery harbour will provide one of the facilities necessary for
further development. Expansion and financial success will occur only, if fishermen
and other entrepreneurs take advantage of economic opportunities, as they arise.
That they will do so, serves as one of the most general assumptions in this report.
This report is in no way, a detailed socio-economic study of the project area.
Without a considerable amount of fieldwork, it would not be possible to plot with
any precision all of the benefits, which will flow from project implementation.
Therefore, the evaluation is mainly limited to an assessment of the direct monetary
benefits, which may accrue and omits an assessment of the indirect benefits, which
would flow from improved per caput income etc.
On the expenditure side, the evaluation excludes certain costs incurred in public
utilities, in addition to town or village social services, in training sea-going
personnel and those whose task it will be to manage shore-based facilities. No
Page 33
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
deductions have been made from costs for taxes, duties and levies imposed by
Government authorities. The inclusion of these items is in line with the
methodology of using ruling market prices. Equally, no deductions have been
made for subsidies or indirect assistance, which may be rendered by a
Government, in order to accelerate development. Hence the evaluation is primarily
a commercial investment analysis, wherein the major costs and benefits are
identified.
As explained in Section 9.2 of Chapter 9, a period of 15 years (Year "0" plus
Years 1 to 14) has been chosen to evaluate the costs and benefits of the integrated
project covering harbour construction, vessel operations and shore-based activities,
to either a retail or shipside (export) level. Of course, the fishery harbour, some of
the fishing vessels, and part of the industrial plants, will have a longer working life
than14 years. These facilities will still be available to the local fishing industry,
after the end of 14 years. Residual investment at the end of Year 14 has not been
taken into account when discounting benefits and cost, as it would have only a
marginal effect on the Internal Rate of Return.
5.4
Sensitivity Analysis of Vessel Operations
5.4.1 Basic Vessel Operations
Appendix 3 gives a detailed account of vessel operations under six headings,
"General Information", "Operational Schedule", "Landings per Trip and per
Season", "Fishing vessel Investment", "Vessel Operating Costs", and "Financial
Results". The information and estimates contained in Appendix 3 are based on
current activities (2016) and expectations about the future. On the basis of the
accounting shown in relevant sections of Appendix 3, net earnings as a percentage
of capital employed are as shown in Table 5 -1.
Table 5 -1
Earnings
Earnings
Type of
before
after
Vessel Depreciation Depreciation
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
24.7
20.0
13.3
0.8
24.1
18.0
11.3
-1.3
Earnings
after
Depreciation
and Interest
22.2
16.6
9.9
-2.7
(Percent)
Earnings
after
Instalment
Payment
18.7
13.1
6.4
-6.2
5.4.2 A 25% Reduction in Prawn Landings.
What would happen to net earnings, if the quantity of prawn landings were 25%
less than those forecast in Appendix 2? A reduction would lower vessel earnings
Page 34
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
(Appendices 2 and 3) unless a fall in landings was offset by increased prices.
However, assuming constant prices (Appendix 2), a 25% reduction would alter the
quantity and value of boatside sales, as indicated in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2
Prawn Landings by Fishing Vessels
Type of vessel As per appendices 2 and 3
With a 25% reduction
Quantity (kg.) Value (Rs.) Quantity (kg.) Value (Rs.)
9M
1,200
1,75,000
938
1,31,250
15 M
9,000
24,60,000
6,750
18,45,000
The income reductions outlined in Table 5-1 change percentage returns on
investment in the following way in Table 5-3.
Table 5-3
Item
Before Depreciation
After Depreciation
After Interest Payment
After Instalment Payment
9M
20.1
15.4
8.7
(-) 3.8
15 M
10.5
4.9
(-) 1.9
(-) 14.4
Prawns are very much critical for 15 M and it may be seen it loses to the extent of
Rs.7,17,500 after payment of instalment payment.
5.4.3 A 20% Reduction in Total Landings of Fish and Prawns
The implications of an overall 20% reduction in landings for both fish and prawns
are shown in Table 5-4.
Table 5-4
Item
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
As per Appendices 2 and 3
Total landings - Quantity (kg.)
25,000
40,000
60,000
125,000
- Value (Rs.)
14,00,000 26,60,000 64,80,000 102,50,000
With a reduction of 20%
Total landings - Quantity (kg.)
20,000
32,000
48,000
100,000
- Value (Rs.)
11,20,000 21,28,000 51,84,000 82,00,000
The foregoing reductions severely affect the financial results of all the three type
of vessels. The financial losses that these boats would incur are summarised in
Table 5-5.
Page 35
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Table 5-5
Item
Before Depreciation
After Depreciation
After Interest Payment
After Instalment Payment
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
-26,000 2,10,000 -1,36,000 -1,00,000
-40,000
28,000 -4,16,000 -6,60,000
-60,250 -1,74,500 -7,53,500 -13,35,000
-97,750 -5,49,500 -13,78,500 -25,85,000
5.4.4 A 25% Increase in Investment in a Fishing Vessel
An increase in investment involves increases in some items of vessel operating costs.
The items affected are maintenance of vessel and engine, maintenance of fishing
gear, vessel insurance, provision for gear replacement, depreciation, interest and
instalment payment. The net earnings as a percentage of capital employed are given
in Tables 5-6.
Table 5-6
Item
9m
12 m
15 m
Before depreciation
67,500 6,32,500 9,30,000
After depreciation
50,000 4,05,000 5,80,000
After interest payment
24,688 1,51,875 1,58,125
After instalment payment -22,188 -3,16,875 -6,23,125
5.4.5
(Rupees)
24 m
15,20,000
8,20,000
-23,750
-15,86,250
What quantity of landings is required to maintain a minimum of
12% return on vessel investment?
This "break-even" type of analysis assumes that only enough surpluses is left, after
deducting operating costs (Item 5.15), from income (Item 3.12) to maintain a 12%
return on investment. All the three type of vessels 9 m, 12 m, 15 m and 24 m could
afford a marginal reduction in landings to the extent of about 6%, 7%, 4% and 1%
respectively to get a 12% return on investment after depreciation. The effects of the
foregoing reductions in terms of quantity and value of landings are shown in Table
5-7.
Table 5-7
Item
As per Appendices 2 and 3
Total landings - Quantity (kg.)
- Value (Rs.)
8m
12 m
15 m
24 m
25,000
40,000
60,000
125,000
14,00,000 26,60,000 64,80,000 102,50,000
Page 36
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
With a minimum
Requirement of 12% Return
on Investment
Total landings - Quantity (kg.)
23,500
37,200
57,600
123,750
- Value (Rs.)
13,16,000 24,73,800 62,20,800 101,47,500
5.4.6 The Situation in a "Poor" Fishing Season
The information about catch composition and landings given in Appendix 2
represents what may be termed as "average" over a long period of time, say, the
working life of fishing vessels, described in this report. In some years, landings
would be greater than those shown and in other years, those would be less. With
regard to the day-to-day operations of a fishing vessel, the quantity of landings is
not constant, and, of course, the catch composition changes with season, in
accordance with the abundance of individual species within the total resources
being exploited. Fluctuations also occur between what is commonly referred to as
the "peak" and "lean" months during a fishing season. These sorts of fluctuations
also occur over a time spread of seasons (years). Most of the analysis in this
section of the report has dealt with reduction in catches with a related commitment
that day to day operating expenses would be met by boat owners and that annual
fixed costs would be paid. In a really "poor" fishing season, it may be possible to
pay only daily expenses and payment of overheads may have to be postponed to a
later time, when fishing efforts are more rewarding.
What are the quantities of landings required to meet daily operating expenses
during a really bad fishing year? In other words, at the prices shown in Appendix
2, how much fish must be sold to cover such costs as fuel, basic wages,
commission, maintenance and any other item for which, under normal
circumstances, payment cannot be deferred?
Before answering this question, it is necessary to introduce two basic assumptions.
Firstly, it is assumed that the "poor" fishing season is a local phenomenon and
hence a shortage of fish and prawns is not offset by higher prices from the boat
owner's point-of-view. In this connection, the relative unimportance of the "local"
market should be noted (see Section 4.9 of Chapter 4). Secondly, it is assumed that
boat-owners are either unwilling to take their fishing vessels to another region or
State, where fishing activities would be more profitable.
Some of the assumptions relating to vessel operating costs, as summarised in
Section 5.0 of Appendix 3 would change to reflect "poor" fishing season. The
consequential amendments could be as follows:
For all types of Vessel
Fuel and lubricating oils
Maintenance of vessel
Maintenance of fishing gear
80%
50%
70%
Page 37
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Basic wages for crew
Food allowances
Harbour dues
75%
50%
100%
On the basis of the foregoing assumptions, the revised operating costs for each
type of fishing vessel would be as follows. The figures in Bold are the costs of the
basic statement shown in section 5.0 of Appendix 3.
9M
12 M
15 M
54 M
13,00,000
17,80,000
50,50,000
77,40,000
11,48,000
13,56,600
39,52,600
60,47,500
The average boat side price per kilogram of landings of fish and prawns, as per
quantities and values shown in Appendices 2 and 3 are shown in Table 5-8.
Table 5-8
Item
9m
12 m
15 m
24 m
Total landings-quantity (kg)
25,000
40,000
60,000
125,000
Total landings-value (Rs.)
14,00,000 26,60,000 64,80,000 102,50,000
Average price per kg.(Rs.)
56.00
66.50
108.00
82.00
If the minimum operating costs of Rs.1148000 Rs.1356600, Rs.3952600 and
Rs.6047500 for a 9 M, 12 M, 15 M and 24 M respectively are divided by the
average price per kilogram shown in Table 5-8, then the quantities of landings
needed to support fishing effort during a "poor" fishing season are as given below
(the figures in brackets are the tonnages shown in Appendix 2):
9M
12 M
15 M
24 M
-
20.5 tonnes (which is 82 % of 25 tonnes)
20.4 tonnes (which is 51 % of 40 tonnes)
36.6 tonnes (which is 61 % of 60 tonnes)
73.75 tonnes (which is 59 % of 125 tonnes)
From the foregoing, it is obvious, that all the types of fishing vessels could
withstand substantial reductions in landings during a "poor" season. This
statement, inter-alia assumes that
(a)
(b)
5.5
there would not be any difficulty about late payment of
certain fixed costs and
that the "poor" season is only a short-term phase in the longterm exploitation of local fishery resources.
Sensitivity Analysis of the Project
Page 38
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendices 1 to 10 outline in detail, a fishery development proposal for
Juvvaladinne fishing harbour project. Appendix 11 which reconciles cash inflows
and cash outflows, provides the base for calculating Financial Internal Rate of
Return (FIRR) on investment for integrated project operations. This reconciliation
and its consequent Financial Internal Rate of Return serves as the "Basic
Statement" of project objectives expressed in financial terms. The Financial
Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) on the basic statement works out to 11-12%.
What would be the Internal Rate of Return if annual vessel landings, as described
in this report, were overestimated by 25%? What would be the effect on total
operations if the landing of prawns fell by 25%? The answers to these questions
and others are given in Table 5-9.
Table 5-9
Financial Internal Rate of Return being Calculated for the Integrated Project
Sl.
No
PROPOSITION
1.1 Basic statement (Appendix 11)
Total fleet landings, hence total products
1.2
being reduced by 20%
1.3 The value of export income being reduced by 25%
The investment cost of all fishing vessels and fishery harbour
1.4 being increased by 25% other variables constant except for
necessary consequential amendments
FINANCIAL
INTERNAL
RATE OF
RETURN
11 - 12 %
Negative %
Negative %
3–4%
Page 39
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 1
Fleet Size, Fishermen Employed and Average Annual Landings
Item
Fishing Vessels Operating
9 metre Motorised Craft
12 metre Gill Netter
15 metre Trawler
24 metre Trawler
Total
Fishermen Employed
9 metre Motorised Craft
12 metre Gill Netter
15 metre Trawler
24 metre Trawler
Total
Average Annual Landings ( tonne )
9 metre Motorised Craft
Prawns
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
Sub-total
Fish
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Sub-total
Total Fish and Prawns
12 metre Gill Netter
Fish
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Sub-total
Total Fish
15 metre Trawler
Prawns
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
Sub-total
Fish
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
1
Year
2 - 14
1000
100
100
50
1250
1000
100
100
50
1250
4000
800
800
500
6100
4000
800
800
500
6100
0
250
1000
1250
0
250
1000
1250
1250 1250
2500 2500
6250 6250
13750 13750
23750 23750
25000 25000
400
800
1400
1400
4000
4000
400
800
1400
1400
4000
4000
240
300
360
900
240
300
360
900
720
1680
1500
720
1680
1500
Page 40
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - Juvvaladinne Fishing Harbour
Item
- Class 4
Sub-total
Total Fish and Prawns
24 metre Tuna Long Liner
Tuna Fish
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
sub – total
Total Fish
Total Fleet
Prawns
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
sub – total
Fish
- Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
sub – total
Total Fish and Prawns - Qty. (tonne)
- Value (Rs. in lakhs)
Year
1
2 - 14
1200 1200
5100 5100
6000 6000
1250
1563
2188
1250
6250
6250
1250
1563
2188
1250
6250
6250
240
550
1360
2150
240
550
1360
2150
3620
6543
11338
17600
39100
41250
28265
3620
6543
11338
17600
39100
41250
28265
Page 41
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix - 2
Average Landings and Value per Season for a Typical
9 Metre Motorised Craft (MC), 12 Metre Gill Netter (GN), 15 Metre Trawler and 24 Metre Tuna Long Liner
Item
Boatside
Price
Rs. / Kg.
%
9 M MC
Quantity
Value
( Kg. ) (Rupees)
12 M GN
Quantity
Value
( Kg. ) (Rupees)
%
%
15 M Trawler
Quantity
Value
( Kg. ) ( Rupees )
%
24 M TLL
Quantity
Value
( Kg. ) ( Rupees )
Prawns
Class - 1
Class - 2
Class - 3
Sub-total
Fish
Class - 1
Class - 2
Class - 3
Class - 4
Sub-total
Total Prawns
and Fish
-
500
300
100
0
1
4
5
0
250
1000
1250
150
100
60
30
5
10
25
55
95
100
0
75000
100000
175000
-
-
-
4
5
6
15
2400
3000
3600
9000
1200000
900000
360000
2460000
1250
2500
6250
13750
23750
187500 10
250000 20
375000 35
412500 35
1225000 100
4000
8000
14000
14000
40000
600000
800000
840000
420000
2660000
12
28
25
20
85
7200
16800
15000
12000
51000
1080000 20
1680000 25
900000 35
360000 20
4020000 100
25000
31250
43750
25000
125000
3750000
3125000
2625000
750000
10250000
25000
1400000 100
40000
2660000 100
60000
6480000 100
125000
10250000
Note % : Catch composition is given in Percentage
Page 42
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 3
General Information, Operational Schedule and Estimated Annual Financial
Statement for a Typical 9 Metre Motorised Craft (MC), 12 Metre Gill Netter (GN), 15 Metre Trawler and 24 Metre Tuna Long Liner
Sl.
No.
1.00
1.01
1.02
1.03
1.04
1.05
1.06
1.07
GENERAL INFORMATION
Length ( metre)
Beam ( metre )
Draught ( metre )
Engine horse power
Fish plus ice carrying capacity ( tonne )
Number in crew
Fishing method mainly
2.00
2.01
2.02
2.03
2.04
2.05
OPERATIONAL SCHEDULE
Number of trips per year
Days per trip
Days at sea per year ( 2.01 x 2.02 )
Days between trips
Length of fishing season (2.03+2.04 )
3.00
3.01
3.02
3.03
3.04
3.05
3.06
LANDINGS PER TRIP AND PER SEASON
Per trip - Prawns
- Landings - Kg.
- Value
- Rs..
- Fish
- Landings - Kg.
- Value
- Rs..
- Total
- Landings - Kg.
- Value
- Rs..
Item
9 Metre OBM
( Monetary Values in Rupees )
Fishing Vessels
12 Metre 15 Metre
24 Metre
9.0
2.0
1.0
10
3
4
Multi Net
12.0
4.0
1.5
60
4
8
Gill Netting
15.0
4.5
2.5
106
6
8
Trawling
24.0
6.0
3.0
160
20
10
Tuna Long Line
100
2
200
70
270
30
6
180
90
270
25
8
200
70
270
25
8
200
70
270
13
1750
238
12250
250
14000
0
0
1333
88667
1333
88667
360
98400
2040
160800
2400
259200
0
0
5000
410000
5000
410000
Page 43
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Sl.
No.
3.07
3.08
3.09
3.10
3.11
3.12
Item
Per season - Prawns
- Fish
- Total
- Landings - Kg.
- Value
- Rs..
- Landings - Kg.
- Value
- Rs..
- Landings - Kg.
- Value
- Rs..
4.00
4.01
4.02
4.03
4.04
4.05
FISHING VESSEL INVESTMENT
Hull and Fittings
Engine and Equipment
Sub - total
Fishing gear
Total Investment
5.00
5.01
5.02
5.03
5.04
5.05
5.06
5.07
5.08
5.09
5.10
5.11
5.12
5.13
5.14
5.15
FISHING VESSEL OPERATING COSTS
Fuel and lubricating oils
Maintenance of vessel & engine (5% of 4.03 )
Maintenance of fishing gear ( 20 % of 4.04 )
Salaries for Crew - explined in Chapter
Food allowances(Rs.800, 3000, 4000/trip for 9 M, 12 M, 15-24 M respect.)
Ice 0.1, 0.5, 1.5 & 3 t/trip respect for 9 M, 12 M, 15 M & 24 M
Commission on sales - 3 % of item 3.12
Port Dues (Rs.500, 1000, 2000 & 3000 / trip for 9 M, 12 M, 15 M & 24 M
Sundries and overheads
Sub - total
Vessel insurance - 3.0 % of item 4.03
Provision for gear replacement - 20%of item 4.04
Sub - total
Depreciation - 7 % of item 4.03
Sub - total
9 Metre OBM
1250
175000
23750
1225000
25000
1400000
Fishing Vessels
12 Metre 15 Metre
0
9000
0 2460000
40000
51000
2660000 4020000
40000
60000
2660000 6480000
24 Metre
0
0
125000
10250000
125000
10250000
160000
40000
200000
100000
300000
2000000
600000
2600000
400000
3000000
3000000
1000000
4000000
1000000
5000000
5500000
2500000
8000000
2000000
10000000
735000
4000
20000
336600
80000
20000
42000
50000
12400
1300000
6000
20000
1326000
14000
1340000
858000
130000
80000
470000
90000
30000
79800
30000
12200
1780000
78000
80000
1938000
182000
2120000
3575000
200000
200000
640000
100000
75000
194400
50000
15600
5050000
120000
200000
5370000
280000
5650000
2681250
400000
400000
3600000
100000
150000
307500
75000
26250
7740000
240000
400000
8380000
560000
8940000
Page 44
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Fuel
Sl.
No.
5.16
5.18
5.19
5.20
6.00
6.01
6.02
6.03
6.04
6.05
6.06
6.07
6.08
6.09
Item
9 Metre OBM
Interest - on capital
- 12% of item 4.05
20250
Sub - total
1360250
Loan instalment payment - 1/ 8 of item 4.05
37500
Total operating costs
1397750
FINANCIAL RESULTS
Surplus before depreciation
74000
Surplus after depreciation
60000
Surplus after interest payment
39750
Surplus after instalment payment
2250
RETURN ON INVESTMENT
Before depreciation
- item 6.01 as a % of 4.05
24.7
After depreciation
- item 6.02 as a % of 4.05
20.0
After interest payment - item 6.03 as a % of 4.05
13.3
After instalment payment - item 6.04 as a % of 4.05
0.8
9 M FRP OBM - Kerosene 120 lit /trip @ Rs.60/lit + Petrol 2 lit/tip @ Rs.75 for 100 trips.
12 M Gill Netter - Diesel 400 lit /trip @ Rs.65/lit + 10% for oil for 30 trips.
15 M Trawler - Diesel 2000 lit /trip @ Rs.65/lit + 10% for oil for 25 trips.
24 M Tuna Long Liner - Diesel 1500 lit /trip @ Rs.65/lit + 10% for oil for 25 trips.
Fishing Vessels
12 Metre 15 Metre
202500 337500
2322500 5987500
375000 625000
2697500 6612500
24 Metre
675000
9615000
1250000
10865000
722000
540000
337500
-37500
1110000
830000
492500
-132500
1870000
1310000
635000
-615000
24.1
18.0
11.3
-1.3
22.2
16.6
9.9
-2.7
18.7
13.1
6.4
-6.2
Page 45
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 4
Recovery Factors and Percentages of Landings Allocated to various Products and Markets
Class of Landings
Markets
Total
and
Export
Local
Inland
Howrah
Type of Products RF PLAM RF PLAM RF PLAM RF PLAM RF PLAM
Prawns
Frozen - Class 1 65
100
65
100
- Class 2
55
70
55
70
- Class 3
50
60
50
60
Fresh
- Class 2
100
5 100
5 100
20 100
30
- Class 3
100
10 100
10 100
20 100
40
Fish
Frozen - Class 1
80
100
80
100
- Class 2
70
50
70
50
Fresh - Class 2
100
10 100
20 100
20 100
50
- Class 3
100
20 100
40 100
40 100
100
- Class 4
100
10 100
20 100
20 100
50
Dried/Cured-Class 4
30
10 30
20 30
20 30
50
Note : RF = Recovery Factor ( Raw Material to Product Weight )
: PLAM = Percentages of Landings Allocated to Product / Market.
Page 46
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 5
Allocation of Raw Material and Products Produced for Each Market Outlet
Class of Landings
Markets
Total
Howrah/Chennai
and
Export
Local
Inland
Type of Products
RM PW RM PW
RM
PW
RM
PW
RM
PW
Prawns
Frozen - Class 1
240 156
240
156
- Class 2
385 212
385
212
- Class 3
816 408
816
408
Fresh - Class 2
28
28
28
28
110
110
165
165
- Class 3
136 136
136
136
272
272
544
544
Fish
Frozen - Class 1
3620 2896
3620 2896
- Class 2
3271 2290
3271 2290
Fresh - Class 2
654 654 1309 1309 1309 1309 3271 3271
- Class 3
2268 2268 4535 4535 4535 4535 11338 11338
- Class 4
1760 1760 3520 3520 3520 3520 8800 8800
Dried/Cured-Class 4
1760 528 3520 1056 3520 1056 8800 2640
Total for all Markets 8332 5962 6605 5373 13047 10583 13266 10802 41250 32719
Note : RM = Raw Material
: PW = Product Weight
Page 47
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 6
Estimates of Capacities of Shore – establishments
(Tonne)
Year 1-14
Demand for Facility
Ice making capacity
Fishing fleet
- 9 metre
- 12 metre
- 15 metre
- 24 metre
Assumptions Regarding Requirements
Fish and Prawns for overnight
storage prior to transportation
Distribution
Prawns
- fresh
- Local
- Inland
- Chennai
Ratio 1:1 for 20% of all fresh
sales of fish and prawns
Ratio 0.2 : 1 for all sales
Ratio 1 : 1 for all sales
Ratio 1 : 1 for all sales
33
164
382
Fish
Ratio 0.2 : 1 for all sales
Ratio 1 : 1 for all sales
Ratio 1 : 1 for all sales
Sub – total
936
9364
9364
20242
Total
21500
4824
20242
46565
- fresh
- Local
- Inland
- Howrah
- Total
Total annual demand summarised
Fishing fleet
Overnight storage
Distribution
Total
Calculation of capacity required
Total demand brought forward
Peak monthly demand
Daily requirement
Ice and fish storage - Capacity needed
Fish curing / drying yard
Raw material - Fish - Class - 4
Peak monthly demand
Daily requirement
100 kg /trip x 100 x 1000 vessels
500 kg /trip x 30 x 100 vessels
1500 kg /trip x 25 x 100 vessels
5000 kg /trip x 20 x 50 vessels
15% of annual demand
Divide peak monthly demand by
30 (days) and rounded
Multiply daily ice making capacity by two
15% of Raw material
Divide peak monthly demand by
30 (days) and rounded
Multiply daily requirements by recovery
factor33.33 % and multiply by 10 and
rounded
10000
1500
3750
6250
21500
4824
46565
6985
230
460
8800
1320
40
130
Note : Existing capacity of ice plants at in and around Nellore district and in and around areas and
the fish merchants themselves bring ice from elsewhere in their vehicles are sufficient.Additional
capacity of 10 t. with 20 t. storage is only recommended.
Page 48
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix 7 (a)
Cost of Production, Distribution and Marketing per Tonne ofFish and Prawn Products for any Year 1 – 14
(Amount in Rupees )
Market - Product
EXPORT MARKET
- Frozen - Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Frozen
- Class 1
- Class 2
LOCAL MARKET
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
INLAND MARKETS
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
HOWRAH / CHENNAI MARKET
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
Prawns
Drying Processing
Ice
Transport Marketing Sub - total
and / or
and / or
and / or to Market Expenses of costs
Sorting Freezing & Storage or Shipside
NEI
Packing
500
500
500
500
500
400
400
300
300
300
1200
30000
30000
30000
20000
20000
-
6000
6000
6000
6000
6000
300
300
300
300
300
-
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
-
-
37500
37500
37500
27500
27500
300
300
300
300
300
300
1000
1000
900
900
900
1500
400
400
300
300
300
1200
500
500
500
500
500
200
900
900
900
900
900
300
1200
1200
1200
1200
1200
1000
500
500
500
500
500
300
3500
3500
3400
3400
3400
3000
400
500
600
1200
500
3200
Page 49
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Market - Product
Fish
- Class 3
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
Drying Processing
Ice
Transport Marketing Sub - total
and / or
and / or
and / or to Market Expenses of costs
Sorting Freezing & Storage or Shipside
NEI
Packing
400
500
600
1200
500
3200
300
500
600
1200
500
3100
300
500
600
1200
500
3100
300
500
600
1200
500
3100
1200
200
300
1000
300
3000
Page 50
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 7 (b)
Retail or F.O.B Prices per Tonne of Product Weight
Market - Product
EXPORT MARKET
Prawns
- Frozen - Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Frozen
- Class 1
- Class 2
LOCAL MARKET
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
INLAND MARKETS
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
HOWRAH / CHENNAI MARKET
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
Sub-total Cost of
of costs
RawApp - 7(a) Material
Total
costs
(Amount in Rupees )
Product
Price Surplus
37500
37500
37500
27500
27500
769231
545455
200000
187500
142857
806731
582955
237500
215000
170357
904000
641000
261000
237000
187000
97269
58045
23500
22000
16643
1000
1000
900
900
900
1500
300000
100000
100000
60000
30000
100000
301000
101000
100900
60900
30900
101500
316000
106000
106000
64000
32000
107000
15000
5000
5100
3100
1100
5500
3500
3500
3400
3400
3400
3000
300000
100000
100000
60000
30000
100000
303500
103500
103400
63400
33400
103000
334000
114000
114000
70000
37000
113000
30500
10500
10600
6600
3600
10000
3200
3200
3100
3100
3100
3000
300000
100000
100000
60000
30000
100000
303200
103200
103100
63100
33100
103000
334000
114000
113000
69000
36000
113000
30800
10800
9900
5900
2900
10000
Page 51
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 7 (c)
Consolidated Statement of Cost of Production, Distribution and Marketing ofFish and Prawn Products - For any Year 1 – 14
( Rs.' 000)
Market – Product
EXPORT MARKET
- Frozen - Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Frozen
- Class 1
- Class 2
LOCAL MARKET
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
INLAND MARKETS
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
HOWRAH / CHENNAI MARKET
Prawns
Product Drying Processing
Ice
Transport Marketing
Weight and / or
and / or
and / or to Market Expenses
(tonne) sorting Freezing & Storage or Shipside
NEI
Packing
Total
costs
156
212
408
2896
2290
78
106
204
1448
1145
4680
6353
12240
57920
45798
936
1271
2448
17376
13739
156
212
408
2896
2290
0
0
0
0
0
5850
7941
15300
79640
62972
28
136
654
2268
1760
528
11
54
196
680
528
634
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
41
196
680
528
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
41
196
680
528
158
28
136
589
2041
1584
792
28
136
1309
4535
3520
1056
11
54
393
1361
1056
1267
14
68
654
2268
1760
211
25
122
1178
4082
3168
317
33
163
1570
5442
4224
1056
14
68
654
2268
1760
317
96
476
4449
15419
11968
3168
Page 52
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Market – Product
Prawns
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish
- Fresh
- Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
TOTAL FOR ALL MARKETS
Product Drying Processing
Ice
Transport Marketing Total
Weight and / or
and / or
and / or to Market Expenses costs
(tonne) sorting Freezing & Storage or Shipside
NEI
Packing
110
44
55
66
132
55
352
272
109
136
163
326
136
870
1309
393
654
785
1570
654
4056
4535
1361
2268
2721
5442
2268 14059
3520
1056
1760
2112
4224
1759 10911
1056
1267
211
317
1056
316
3167
32719
13455
137049
52279
31201
11880 245863
Page 53
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 8
Cash outflow Statement - New Investment
(Amount - Rs. in lakhs )
Item
Year
"0"
1
Total
Fishing vessels (already invested)
3000.00
9 metre Motorised Craft 3000.00
3000.00
12 metre Gill Netter 3000.00
5000.00
15 metre Trawler 5000.00
5000.00
24 metre TLL 5000.00
Total
16000.00
16000.00
Fishery Harbour
Fishery harbour - New Investment
21799.80 2422.20 24222.00
Shore - Establishments
180.00
180.00
Pre Development Expenditure
20.00
20.00
Total Investment
37999.80 2422.20 40422.00
Page 54
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 9
Cash outflow Statement
Operating Costs for Integrated project Operations
(Amount - Rs. in lakhs )
Year
Item
1
2 – 14
Fishing vessels
9 metre Motorised Craft
13260.00
13260.00
12 metre Gill Netter
1938.00
1938.00
15 metre Trawler
5370.00
5370.00
4190.00
4190.00
24 metre TLL
Total
24758.00
24758.00
Processing, Distribution and Marketing
Drying and/or sorting
134.55
134.55
Processing and/or freezing and packing
1370.49
1370.49
Ice and/or storage
522.79
522.79
Transport to market or ship side
312.01
312.01
Marketing expenses not elsewhere included
118.80
118.80
Total
2458.63
2458.63
Harbour Management and Maintenance
Harbour Management
150.00
150.00
Harbour maintenance
484.44
484.44
Total
634.44
634.44
Total operating costs summarised
Fishing vessels
24758.00
24758.00
Processing, Distribution and Marketing
2458.63
2458.63
Harbour management and maintenance
634.44
634.44
Total
27851.07
27851.07
Page 55
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 10
Cash Inflow Statement
Income from Sale of Fish and Crustacean Products
Product price
Product
Rupees
Weight
Per tonne
(Qty - tonne)
Market – Product
EXPORT MARKET
Prawns - Frozen - Class 1
- Class 2
- Class 3
Fish - Frozen - Class 1
- Class 2
LOCAL MARKET
Prawns - Fresh - Class 2
- Class 3
Fish - Fresh - Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
INLAND MARKETS
Prawns - Fresh - Class 2
- Class 3
Fish - Fresh - Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
HOWRAH / CHENNAI MARKET
Prawns - Fresh - Class 2
- Class 3
Fish - Fresh - Class 2
- Class 3
- Class 4
Dried/Cured - Class 4
TOTAL FOR ALL MARKETS
(Amount - Rs. in lakhs)
Year
1
2 – 14
904000
641000
261000
237000
187000
156
212
408
2896
2290
1410.24
1357.32
1064.88
6863.52
4282.07
1410.24
1357.32
1064.88
6863.52
4282.07
316000
106000
106000
64000
32000
107000
28
136
654
2268
1760
528
86.90
144.16
693.51
1451.20
563.20
564.96
86.90
144.16
693.51
1451.20
563.20
564.96
334000
114000
114000
70000
37000
113000
28
136
1309
4535
3520
1056
91.85
155.04
1491.69
3174.50
1302.40
1193.28
91.85
155.04
1491.69
3174.50
1302.40
1193.28
334000
114000
113000
69000
36000
113000
-
110
272
1309
4535
3520
1056
32719
367.40
310.08
1478.61
3129.15
1267.20
1193.28
33636.42
367.40
310.08
1478.61
3129.15
1267.20
1193.28
33636.42
Page 56
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix – 11
Reconciliation of Cash Inflow and Cash Outflow Statements
(Rs. in Lakhs)
Item
Cash inflow
Income from sale of fish and prawn products
Less
Cash outflow
Investment in new fixed assets
Operating costs ( Fishing fleet +
Harbour Management and Maintenance)
Balance to be discounted for the
calculation of Internal Rate of Return
Reference
"0"
App - 10
Year
1
2 – 14
33636.42 33636.42
App - 8
37999.80
App - 9
-
-
-37999.80
2422.20
-
27851.07 27851.07
3363.16
5785.36
Note : The above statement represents the " Basic statement " for the purpose of financial
evaluation
The Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) on this statement works out to 11 - 12%
Page 57
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix - 11 A
(1)
A 20% reduction in total landings
Reconciliation of Cash Inflow and Cash Outflow Statements
Item
Cash inflow
Income from sale of fish and prawn products
Less
Cash outflow
Investment in new fixed assets
Operating costs ( Fishing fleet +
Harbour Management and Maintenance)
Balance to be discounted for the
calculation of Internal Rate of Return
Reference
"0"
App - 10
(Rs. in Lakhs )
Year
1
2 – 14
26909.14 26909.14
App - 8
37999.80
App - 9
-
-
-37999.80
2422.20
-
25449.34 25449.34
-962.40
1459.80
Note :The Internal Rate of Return ( IRR ) on this statement works out to Negative %
Page 58
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix - 11 B
(2) A 25% reduction in export income
Reconciliation of Cash Inflow and Cash Outflow Statements
(Rs. in Lakhs )
Item
Cash inflow
Income from sale of fish and prawn products
Less
Cash outflow
Investment in new fixed assets
Operating costs ( Fishing fleet +
Harbour Management and Maintenance)
Balance to be discounted for the
calculation of Internal Rate of Return
Reference
"0"
App - 10
Year
1
2 – 14
29898.54 29898.54
App – 8
37999.80
App – 9
-
-
-37999.80
2422.20
-
27851.07 27851.07
-374.72
2047.48
Note :The Internal Rate of Return ( IRR ) on this statement works out to Negative %
Page 59
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix - 11 C
(3) A 25% increase in Investment
Reconciliation of Cash Inflow and Cash Outflow Statements
(Rs. in Lakhs )
Item
Cash inflow
Income from sale of fish and prawn products
Less
Cash outflow
Investment in new fixed assets
Operating costs ( Fishing fleet +
Harbour Management and Maintenance)
Balance to be discounted for the
calculation of Internal Rate of Return
Reference
"0"
App - 10
Year
1
2 – 14
33636.42 33636.42
App – 8
47499.75
App – 9
-
-
-47499.75
3027.75
-
29133.83 29133.83
1474.84
4502.59
Note :The Internal Rate of Return ( IRR ) on this statement works out to 3 – 4 %
Page 60
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER 5
ENGINEERINGINVESTIGATIONS
5.1
Introduction
The site for the proposed fishery harbour is at the point where the Chippaleru
stream coming from upland areas in Jaladanki area joins the Bay of Bengal.
Detailed engineering investigations covering topographic/ hydrographic surveys
and sub soil investigation at the project site inJuvvaladinne were carried out by
CICEF duringSeptember 2014 and September 2016 respectively.The model
studies are conducted by CWPRS, Pune.
5.2
Location of site
The location of the proposed fishery harbour site atJuvvaladinne corresponds to
Latitude 14o 48’29”North and Longitude80o05’03”East and is at Bogole Mandal in
Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh. situatedat a distance of 12 km from Bagole, the
mandalhead quarters in Nellore district.The nearest railway station to Juvvaladinne
is Bitragunta which is located in and around 9.6 kilometer distance.The other
important railway station to Juvvaladinne is Kavali at a distance of 25 km. The site
is about 1 km from Juvvaladinne village.Juvvaladinne is located around 37.4
kilometer away from its district head quarter Nellore.
The basic infrastructure facilities like road, electricity, water supply, post and
telegraph, telecommunication, etc., are available at Juvvaladinne. Hospital, banks
are available at Bagole. The Location and approaches to the project site are shown
in Drg. No.AP- JUVL /01. A satellite imagery of the project site is shown below.
Satellite imagery showing Juvvaladinne Fishery Harbour site
Page 61
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
5.3
Datum
All levels refer to a chart datum which is +3.60 m below the GTS bench marked
on top of surplus weir of Edla tank in S.V.Palem of Bhogole Mandal. In addition,
CICEF, Bangalore has established a TBM,engraved as CICEF
,on top of
sluice gate abutment at the entrance of the Bukhingham Canal at Juvvaladinne
village and its value is +3.532m w.r.t the Chart datum.
5.4
Grid
The survey drawing is positioned in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate grid system with respect to WGS 84 datum and UTM Zone 44P (78oE –
84oE).
5.5
Topographic & Hydrographic survey
Detailed engineering investigation covering topographic and hydrographic surveys
were carried out by CICEF, Bangalore for the proposed fishery at Juvvaladinne
during September 2014. The topographic features of the land area were surveyed
and the contours were plotted on the topographic map after reducing the levels to
chart datum to represent the topographic features of the land area. The coastline is
straight, low and silty with fringe of coconut and other palms. The average ground
level at the proposed site is observed as +1.50 m.The topographic features of the
area were surveyed using Global Positioning System (GPS), total station, levelling
instrument and staves. The topographic features are shown in Drg. No.AP- JUVL
/02.
CICEF survey team conducted necessary topographic survey along the Uppateru
creek for about 1.5 km from the proposed straight cut to open the mouth and along
the shoreline for about 800 m on either side of the Uppateru creek.
The list of co-ordinates of the survey stations established by CICEF, Bangalore are
given in Table 5-1.
Table 5-1
Coordinates, Reduced levels and Description of survey stations
Sl.
No.
UTM Co-ordinates
Northing (m)
Easting (m)
Reduced
Level (m)
Description
1
1637378.21
400978.41
3.75
Engraved on a stone pillar on the
Bukhingham Canal sluice gate
abutment
2
1637291.55
401443.73
3.76
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
3
1637352.12
401846.24
1.76
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
Page 62
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Sl.
No.
UTM Co-ordinates
Northing (m)
Easting (m)
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1637594.66
1637584.01
1637386.30
1637009.89
1637367.89
1638313.02
1638003.98
1638394.71
401393.76
401748.04
402169.88
401865.76
402338.45
401953.65
402318.77
402259.94
Reduced
Level (m)
Description
3.24
4.23
4.26
3.61
3.92
8.66
3.06
2.65
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
G.I. Pipe embedded in concrete
In order to arrive at the depth contours at proposed fishery harbour, hydrographic
survey was conducted. From the hydro graphic survey, it is seen that the depths on
the creek side are shallowand on sea side, it is seen that the deeper depths up to 2.0m are available close to the shore at a distance of about 150m. The seabed is
gradually sloping and bed level of RL -6.0m is available at a distance of about
600m from the shore. The results of the hydrographic survey conducted by CICEF
are reproduced on Drg.No.AP- JUVL /02.
5.6
Tide Levels
The following are the standard tide levels as mentioned in Admiralty Chart
published by the Naval Hydrographic Office for Krishnapattinam region also
applicable toJuvvaladinne site:
MHWS
MHWN
MSL
MLWN
MLWS
= + 1.16 m
= + 0.86 m
= + 0.66 m
= + 0.45 m
= + 0.16 m
The above tide levels are with reference to the chart datum. As could be seen from
the above tide levels, the tidal variation during neap tides is of the order of 0.41 m
while the same during spring tides is 1.00 m. The tides are of mixed type generally
exhibiting semi-diurnal nature with large diurnal inequalities meaning different
levels between successive high and low waters. Furthermore, the extreme water
level considering a storm surge of 0.67m occurs at the high water level of +1.83m.
5.7
Tide Measurement
The tide measurement was carried out between 5.12.2016 and 23.12.2016 at sluice
gate abutment of the Bukhingham Canal, Juvvaldinne village. The measured water
levels were connected to the bench-mark given by Client which is (+) 3.532 m CD
below a bench-mark engraved as CICEF, BM on top of sluice gate abutment of the
Page 63
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Bukhingham Canal. The measurement location of ATG is shown in Fig. 1. The
details of tide measurement locations are given below.
Tide
(Stn. T1)
Location (WGS 84)
Geographical
Latitude, N
Longitude, E
Duration
UTM – Zone 44
X (m)
From
To
Y (m)
14° 48' 31.39" 80° 04' 47.13" 400974.82 1637372.34 5.12.2016 23.12.2016
5.8
Current Measurement
The current measurements were carried out at two locations i.e. Stn. C1 and Stn.
C2 between 05.12.2016 and 23.12.2016. The locations of current measurements
are shown in Fig. 1. The Geographical locations of current measurements are:
Location
Stn.C1
(Creek)
Location (WGS 84)
Geographic
UTM-Zone 44
Latitude, N Longitude, E
X (m)
Y (m)
Duration
From
To
14°48'36.32" 80°04'45.10" 400915.96 1637524.68 5.12.2016 23.12.2016
Stn. C2
(Open-sea) 14°48'53.14" 80°05'56.22" 403044.00 1638032.86 5.12.2016 23.12.2016
At station C1,the current speed varied between 0 m/s and 0.5 m/s. The current
direction mainly remained between 135° and 315°. At station C2, the current
speed varied between 0 m/s and 0.3 m/s. The current direction scattered randomly
at all direction.
5.9
Wind climate
Wind speed is always greater over the sea than over the land. In the winter season
(Northeast monsoon) i.e., from November to February, wind blows from
northwest, north, south and southeast directions in the morning time and from
northeast, east and south in the evening times. The wind will have average force of
4 rising up to 7 (28 to 33knots) occasionally. They progressively decrease in
February and March. In the hot weather months, wind blows in the same direction
as in march and may reach a force up to2 to 4. Winds in the southwest monsoon
months are very strong predominantly in west, southwest and northwest directions.
From June to August winds are fairly constant. 75 percent of all winds are from
between southwest and west, the average strength being 4 to 5 in this season.
During the transition period winds are of land origin blowing with a force of 2 to 4
in north and northeast direction.
Page 64
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
5.10
Wave climate
The site is on the east coast of India. At Juvvaladinne village there is a creek called
Uppateru creek. As such the FH site is protected from waves. In order to stabilize
the mouth of the creek which is at present is shifting towards north, training walls
are proposed. Wave analysis is required in order to design the training walls. The
site being in the east coast is affected by southwest, north east monsoon as well as
cyclones.
Based on the ship observed data for 19 years ( 1968-1986) published through
Indian Daily Weather Report by India Meteorological Department, Pune, the wave
characteristics during May and June for latitude 100 to 150 N, longitude 800 to 850
E covering the study region shows that the wave heights range between 1.0 and
2.5 m and the wave periods predominantly vary between 5 and 9 secs.
A large percentage of waves in deepwater are from SW and NE directions. A
relatively small percentage of waves are also observed from SE and E, while the
waves from W and NW are almost negligible. But the swell from SW or S do not
reach coast due to the particular orientation of the coast line. The shore are thus
exposed only to the waves coming from NE, E and SE. The wave heights for waves
coming from NE, E and SE seem to vary between 0.5 and 2m on the average, the
most frequent wave heights being around 1m. Exceptionally high waves of the order
of 4 m or more also have been recorded but they are very rare and might possibly be
related to the cyclones in Bay of Bengal. The wave periods vary commonly between 5
and 12 seconds, the most frequent waves being of 5 sec period. The weighted mean of
the wave period is around 7 sec.
5.11
Tropical depressions/Cyclones
A study of the storm/cyclone tracks published by the India Meteorological
Department for the period 1877 to 1992 infers that the east coast is more prone to
storms and cyclones than the west coast. On an average, for every one storm
occurred on the west coast, there are 6 storms occurred on the east coast according
to previous statistics. Out of the storms that develop in the Bay of Bengal, over
58% approach and cross the east coast in October and November. Only 25% of the
storms that develop over the Arabian Sea approach the west coast. In the premonsoon season corresponding figures are 30% and 25% respectively.
Further, it is observed that the maximum number of cyclones and depressions
occur during the month of October and November. From the records, a total of 885
storms have occurred on the east coast in the 115 years period, while on the west
coast the number is 148 only. From the study of storm tracks for the above period
it is found that very few cyclone and three depressions passed nearNellore region.
Page 65
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
5.12
Visibility
Visibility is normally good over Bay of Bengal. Visibility will be reduced during
heavy rain. During torrential rain it will be very poor and hinders navigation or
other related activities. The average frequency of fog is less than 2% over the
whole area.
5.13
Demarcation of High Tide Line and Low Tide Line
CRZ demarcation for coastal stretches of the sea, bays, rivers and backwaters
which are influenced by tidal action are mandatary as per Government of India,
Ministry of Environment and Forests. HTL and LTL mapping should be carried
out following the guidelines issued by Ministry of Environment and Forest,
Government of India. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Govt. of India has
authorised seven below mentioned agencies vide Lr. No. J17011/8/92-1A III,
dated 10.05.1999 to carry out demarcation of High Tide Line, Low Tide Lineand
delineation of CRZ boundaries:
1. Space Application Centre, Ahmedabad
2. Centre for Earth Science Studies, Thiruvananthapuram
3. Institute for Remote Sensing, Anna University, Chennai
4. Institute for Wetland Management and Ecological Designs, Calcutta
5. Naval Hydrographer's Office, Dehradun
6. National Institute of Oceanography, Panjim, Goa
7. National Institute of Ocean Technology (NIOT), Chennai
8. National Centre for Sustainable Coastal Management (NCSCM),
Chennai
CRZ study was awarded to Institute for Remote Sensing, Anna University,
Chennai; is a premiere oceanographic research institute. This Institute has the
necessary expertise supported by equipment and infrastructural facilities to carry
out the above studies.
Keeping in view the requirement of Coastal Regulation Zone legislation, Institute
for Remote Sensing, Anna University, Chennai - one of the authorized agencies of
the MoEF - has carried out the CRZ survey for necessary demarcation and
classification of the coastal regulation zone. The details of these investigations and
the CRZ maps are appended in this report as Annexure A.
5.14
Subsoil investigations
Page 66
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Subsoil investigation of the underground conditions at a site is prerequisite to the
economical design of the substructure elements. Subsoil investigation was planned
to obtain the subsoil stratification in the project area and collect soil and rock
samples for laboratory testing to determine the engineering properties such as
shear strength, density,specific gravity, void ratio, sulphate content, grain size
analysis, Atterberg’s limit etc.
CICEF carried out the required subsoil investigations at the specified locations,
during September 2015.
Field investigation was carried out covering the proposed alignment of the quay
and reclamation area of the fisheries harbour. 2 boreholes were drilled by wash
boring method. Penetration testing is used in conjunction with these method and
disturbed samples are recovered in the split spoon. Penetration counts are taken at
1 to 1.5m increments of depth. Thus all 2 exploratory boreholes were drilled, the
locations of which are shown in Drg. No. AP- JUVL /05.
The list of the geotechnical boreholes carried out at locations of various proposed
structures is presented in Table-1.
Sl.No. ProposedStructure
1
Training Wall
2
Reclamation Area
FieldTest
BH-1
BH-2
Table 1: Details of Field Test Locations w.r.t. Proposed Structures
5.14.1
Boring in Soil
Boring was done in accordance with IS: 1892 -1979. A Standard boring winch of
1.5 ton was used for boring in the overburden strata (soil strata) with 100mm dia
boreholes. The boreholes were advanced from the original ground level and
terminated in hard rock. A hole is started by driving casing to a depth of 2 to 3.5
m. Casing is simply a pipe that supports the hole, preventing the walls from
sloughing off or caving in. The casing is cleaned out by means of a chopping bit
fastened to the lower end of the drill rod. Water is pumped through the drill rod
and exits at high velocity through holes in the bit. The water rises between the
casing and drill rod, carrying suspended soil particles, and overflows at the top of
the casing through a T connection into a container, from which the effluent is
recirculated back through the drill rod. The hole is advanced by raising, rotating,
and dropping the bit into the soil at the bottom of the hole. Drill rods, and if
necessary casing, are added as the depth of the boring increases. Usually 6 m or
less of casing is required at a hole site. This method is quite rapid for advancing
holes in all but very hard soil strata.
5.14.2
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT)
SPT’s were carried out using a split spoon sampler complete with a drive shoe and
drive head fitted with a non-return valve. The basis of the test consists of dropping
Page 67
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
a hammer of mass 63.5 kg (623N) on to a drive head from a height of 750 mm (as
specified in I.S. Code of Practice). An auto trip hammer capable of dropping the
weight freely on the anvil over a fixed height of 750mm was used to assure the
quality of the test. The number of such blows (SPT “N”) necessary to achieve a
penetration of the split spoon sampler of 300mm (after its penetration under
gravity and below the seating drive) is regarded as the penetration resistance. The
blow counts for each 150 mm penetration were recorded. Small disturbed samples
were obtained from the split spoon sampler after completion of the tests.
The field data obtained from exploratory boreholes was studied and bore logs were
prepared. These bore logs are presented as Annexure I and II along with SPT
values.
As the boreholes were advanced, hard stratum was encountered at depths ranging
from 12 m to 16 m.
5.14.3
Sampling
Qualitative information regarding soil identification and classification can be
obtained from the disturbed soil samples.
5.14.4
Laboratory Testing
Selected soil samples, collected during boring/drilling of boreholes were subjected
to laboratory tests to determine the index and engineering characteristics as
specified. The samples to be tested, type and number of laboratory tests to be
carried out were decided to derive the maximum relevant information. Disturbed
samples in SPT split spoons were collected from the boreholes. The soil samples
were visually identified and described in accordance with relevant IS codes and
thereafter packed, labelled, sealed and dispatched to the laboratory. The
classification, index property, NMC, specific gravity, density and chemical tests
were carried out on the soil samples. The summary of the laboratory test results is
presented on Appendix- I, II and III.
5.14.5
Collection of Bed Samples & Testing
Seabed sampling was undertaken at three different locations to directly sample the
seabed sediments and the disturbed soil samples collected are sent to Civil
Engineering Department of V.R.Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada to
conduct necessary soil testing such as grain size distribution and other related soil
properties in connection with construction of Fishery Harbour & Training
Wall.The summary of the laboratory test results is presented on Appendix- IV.
5.14.6
Collection of Water Samples & Testing
Water samples are collected at three different locations to know the Suspended
sediment concentration in water and the jar containing the water samples are clearly
Page 68
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
marked and sent to Civil Engineering Department of V.R.Siddhartha Engineering
College, Vijayawada to conduct necessary tests.The summary of the laboratory test
results is presented below:
Sl.
No.
I.
Sample Location
Construction of Fishery Harbour at
Uppada in East Godavari & breakwater
for the proposed Harbour,
5.14.7
Sample
identification
1
2
3
Test Result
78 mg/l
75 mg/l
72 mg/l
Conclusion
Based on the subsoil investigations conducted at site and laboratory results, it
appears that the soil layers up to 10 m depth is Silt sand of loose state and the soil
layers from 10 m to 18 m depth consist of fine sand of medium state.
From the results of the subsoil investigations and from the point of view economic
cost, deck slab supported on RC Bored Piledstructure is considered to be the most
suited type of structure for the proposed quay.
Fig 1: Location Map of the Current measurement locations
Page 69
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Fig 2: Variation of Current Speed and Direction at Station C1
Page 70
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Fig 3. Distribution of Current Speed and Direction at Stn. C1 (Juvvaladinne Creek)
Page 71
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Fig 2: Variation of Current Speed and Direction at Station C2
Fig 5. Distribution of Current Speed and Direction at Stn. C2
(Juvvaladinne-Open Sea)
Page 72
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Fig 6: Variation of Measured Tides – Juvvaladinne Creek
Page 73
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Annexure I
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) – Boring Log
Place : Juvvaladinne
11.08.2015
Date :
Location : 1637321.21N, 401544090E
Page No. : 1
Nellore Dist. Andhra Pradesh
Bore Hole No. : 2
Ground Level (w.r.t CD): + 1.445 m
Dept
h
Belo
w
GL
or
Bed
Lev
el in
‘m’
1.00
RL
in
‘m’
w.r.
t
CD
3.00
5.00
Strata
Lege
nd
Thickn
ess
Water Table Level (w.r.t CD) :
“N”
Value
Type
Samp
Of Soil
le
Collect
or
ed
Tube
(DS/
No
UDS)
Descriptio
n
of Strata
&
Classifica
tion
“N” Value Graphical
representation
0
0.4
45
1.5
55
3.5
55
DS
Free sink
DS
2 3 5 8
DS
9 9 9 18
7.00
5.5
55
DS
3 4 4 8
9.00
7.5
55
DS
4 5 5 10
11.0
0
9.5
55
DS
8 6 5 11
10
20
30
40
Brown
Silty clay
--Medium
to coarse
sand, grey
in colour
Medium
to coarse
sand, grey
in colour
Medium
to coarse
sand, grey
in colour
Medium
to coarse
sand, grey
in colour
Legend:
UDS – Undisturbed Sample, DS- Disturbed Sample, Type of Boring- Wash, Casing diameter-8.8cm, CDChart Datum
Annexure II
Page 74
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) – Boring Log
Place : Juvvaladinne
11.08.2015
Date :
Location : 1637412.00N, 401871.00E
Page No. : 1
Nellore Dist. Andhra Pradesh
Bore Hole No. : 1
Ground Level (w.r.t CD): + 1.39 m
Dep
th
Belo
w
GL
or
Bed
Lev
el in
‘m’
2.00
4.00
RL
in
‘m’
w.r.
t
CD
Lege
nd
Thickn
ess
Type
Of
Soil
Collec
ted
(DS/
UDS)
“N”
Value
Descripti
on
of Strata
&
Classifica
tion
Sam
ple
or
Tube
No
“N” Value Graphical
representation
0
0.6
1
2.6
1
10.0
0
4.6
1
8.6
1
14.0
0
6.00
Strata
Water Table Level (w.r.t CD) :
DS
1
1
2
3
--Medium
to coarse
sand,
grey in
colour
---
DS
2
3
6
9
DS
1
6
8
1
4
DS
5
5
7
1
2
12.
61
DS
1
6
2
2
2
0
4
2
16.0
0
14.
61
DS
1
0
2
0
2
6
4
6
18.0
0
16.
61
DS
1
9
2
5
3
0
5
5
10 20 30
40
Silty
sand,
grey in
colour
Fine
sand,
grey in
colour
Fine
sand,
grey in
colour
Very fine
sand,
brown in
colour
Legend:
UDS – Undisturbed Sample, DS- Disturbed Sample, Type of Boring- Wash, Casing diameter-8.8cm, CDChart Datum
Page 75
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix I
20
30
40
50
60
Clay
(%)
Specific Gravity
(G)
Silt
(%)
Bulk Density
( g/cm2 )
Sand (%)
Grave l
(%)
Dire ct She ar Te st
(IS 2720: part 13)
Che mical Conte nts of Soil Sample s
Sulphate
Ø (DEG)
10
Natural Moisture
Content (NMC) ( % )
0
70
SOIL DESCRIPTION
I.S Classification
N -- VALUE
Standard Penetration Test Results
No. of. Blows N/30.0cm
Particle size Analysis
Cohesion
(t/m2)
1.39
DEPTH (M)
From Ground )
Reduced Level
( R.L )
Sample Nature
Borehole /TP No.
(
SOIL TEST REPORT
(%)
(ppm)
(%)
(ppm)
0.0
24
0.040875
408.75
0.034049
340.49
28
0.031500
315.00
0.026240
262.40
Course
Me dium
Fine
0.00
3.50
23.80
68.30
4.10
0.30
16.19
3.71
2.56
0.00
0.80
7.70
83.50
6.30
1.70
19.79
2.53
2.53
0.0
SO4
SO3
0.00
-1.00
SPT
-0.61
-2.00
3
-3.00
SPT
-2.61
-4.00
9
SAND in grey colour
-5.00
-4.61
-6.00
14
-7.00
-8.00
-9.00
B.H. 1
Ne ar St. 4
SPT
-8.61
-10.00
12
Silty SAND in Gray Color
42
fine SAND grey in color
46
fine SAND grey in color
55
silty fine SAND Brownish in color
-11.00
-12.00
-13.00
SPT
-12.61
-14.00
-15.00
-14.61
-16.00
-17.00
SPT
-16.61
-18.00
Page 76
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix II
50
Medium
Fine
-
-
-
-
-
-
11.36
2.70
2.55
0.90
7.20
49.20
39.80
2.80
0.10
13.99
2.81
2.58
0.0
Specific Gravity
(G)
Course
60 70
Clay
(%)
Ø (DEG)
40
Silt
(%)
Cohesion (t/m 2)
30
Gravel
(%)
Chemical Contents of Soil Samples
Sulphate
(%)
(ppm)
(%)
(ppm)
0.0
28
-
-
-
-
26
-
-
-
-
SO4
SO3
0.00
-1.00
SPT
20
Direct Shear Test
(IS 2720: part 13)
Bulk Density
( g/cm2 )
1.45
10
Particle size Analysis
Sand (%)
Natural Moisture
Content (NMC) ( %
)
0
SOIL DESCRIPTION
I.S Classification
Standard Penetration Test
Results
No. of. Blows N/30.0cm
N -- VALUE
DEPTH (M)
(Ground level)
Reduced Level
( R.L )
Sample Nature
Borehole /TP No.
SOIL TEST REPORT
0
Silty CLAY
18
Medium SAND
10
Medium SAND
11
medium fine SAND grey in colour
-2.00
-1.55
-3.00
-4.00
SPT
-3.55
B.H. 2
Near St.
2
-5.00
-6.00
-5.55
-7.00
-8.00
SPT
-7.55
-9.00
-10.00
SPT
-9.55
-11.00
Page 77
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix III
10
20
30
40
50
Fine
Silt
(%)
Clay
(%)
60 70
Chemical Contents of Soil Samples
Sulphate
Ø (DEG)
Medium
Cohesion (t/m 2)
Course
Specific Gravity
(G)
Gravel
(%)
Direct Shear Test
(IS 2720: part 13)
Bulk Density
( g/cm2 )
Particle size Analysis
Sand (%)
Natural Moisture Content
(NMC) ( % )
0
1.43
SOIL DESCRIPTION
I.S Classification
Standard Penetration Test
Results
No. of. Blows N/30.0cm
N -- VALUE
UDS
DEPTH (M)
(Ground level)
Sample Nature
BH near
Station 4
Reduced Level
( R.L )
Borehole /TP No.
SOIL TEST REPORT
SO4
SO3
(%)
(ppm)
(%)
(ppm)
0.00
-1.00
-2.00
-3.00
-2.57
-4.00
medium to fine SAND grey in colour
0.00
1.80
21.60
74.40
2.10
0.10
16.61
1.87
2.59
0.0
25
0.040875
408.75
0.034049
340.49
fine SAND grey in colour
-
-
-
-
-
-
22.03
1.71
2.60
0.0
25
0.030000
300.00
0.024990
249.90
-5.00
UDS
-4.57
-6.00
Page 78
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Appendix IV
Sample collection location
: Sample No. 1
Visual Identification of soil: Yellowish brown silty fine sand – Poorly graded
IS Soil Classification
: SM - SP
Sieve Analysis Test Results:
Gravel Fraction
: 00 %
Coarse sand size
: 00 %
Medium sand size
: 06 %
Fine sand size
: 82 %
Silt & Clay Size [less than 2 micron]
: 12 %
Mean grain size, D50
Effective grain size, D10
D60
D30
Uniformity Coefficient, Cu
Curvature Coefficient, Cc
Consistency Limits Results:
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
: 0.18 mm
: 0.062 mm
: 0.20 mm
: 0.12 mm
: D60/D10 = 3.25
: [D30 x D30]/ D60 x D10 = 1.16
Specific Gravity of Soil, G
= 2.66
: Non Plastic
: Non Plastic
: Non Plastic
Permeability Characteristics
= Pervious
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sample collection location
: Sample No. 2
Visual Identification of soil: Yellowish brown silty fine sand
IS Soil Classification
: SM - SP
Sieve Analysis Test Results:
Gravel Fraction
: 00 %
Coarse sand size
: 00 %
Medium sand size
: 04 %
Fine sand size
: 81 %
Silt & Clay Size [less than 2 micron]
: 15 %
Mean grain size, D50
: 0.18 mm
Effective grain size, D10
: 0.060 mm
D60
: 0.20 mm
D30
: 0.12 mm
Uniformity Coefficient, Cu
: D60/D10 = 3.33
Curvature Coefficient, Cc
: [D30 x D30]/ D60 x D10 = 1.20
Consistency Limits Results:
Liquid Limit
: Non Plastic
Plastic Limit
: Non Plastic
Plasticity Index
: Non Plastic
Page 79
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Specific Gravity of Soil, G
= 2.66
Permeability Characteristics
= Pervious
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sample collection location
: Sample No. 3
Visual Identification of soil : Yellowish brown silty fine sand
IS Soil Classification
: SM - SP
Sieve Analysis Test Results:
Gravel Fraction
: 00 %
Coarse sand size
: 00 %
Medium sand size
: 03 %
Fine sand size
: 82 %
Silt & Clay Size [ less than 2 micron]
: 15 %
Mean grain size, D50
: 0.18 mm
Effective grain size, D10
: 0.060 mm
D60
: 0.20 mm
D30
: 0.12 mm
Uniformity Coefficient, Cu
: D60/D10 = 3.33
Curvature Coefficient, Cc
: [D30 x D30]/ D60 x D10 = 1.20
Consistency Limits Results:
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
: Non Plastic
: Non Plastic
: Non Plastic
Specific Gravity of Soil, G
= 2.66
Permeability Characteristics
= Pervious
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sample collection location
: Sample No. 4
Visual Identification of soil: Yellowish brown silty fine sand
IS Soil Classification
: SM - SP
Sieve Analysis Test Results:
Gravel Fraction
: 00 %
Coarse sand size
: 00 %
Medium sand size
: 08 %
Fine sand size
: 82 %
Silt & Clay Size [ less than 2 micron]
: 10 %
Mean grain size, D50
: 0.18 mm
Effective grain size, D10
: 0.075 mm
D60
: 0.20 mm
D30
: 0.12 mm
Uniformity Coefficient, Cu
: D60/D10 = 2.67
Page 80
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Curvature Coefficient, Cc
Consistency Limits Results:
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plasticity Index
Specific Gravity of Soil, G
Permeability Characteristics
: [D30 x D30]/ D60 x D10 = 1.07
: Non Plastic
: Non Plastic
: Non Plastic
= 2.66
= Pervious
Page 81
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER 6
DESIGN OF FISHERY HARBOUR
6.1
Design fishing fleet size
In order to arrive at the fleet size for which the proposed fishery harbour is to be
designed, the Director, CICEF held correspondence and discussions with the
Commissioner of Fisheries, Governmentof Andhra Pradesh. As a result of
correspondence and taking into consideration various fishery aspects, it was
agreed vide Andhra Pradesh Government letter number2224/J1/1998 dated
05.01.2015 that the fishery harbour at Juvvaladinne shall be designed for a fleet size
of 1000 numbers of 9 m length motorized crafts, 150numbers of mechanised
fishing vessels comprising 100 numbers of 14 m Trawlers and 50 Gill Netter
belonging to Juvvaladinne fishery zone. Presently the Trawlers, Gill Netter and
Motorised Crafts currently undertaking fishing operations do not have any
facilities including fish landing and berthing facilities at Uppateru creek.
6.2
Fishing vessel characteristics
The vessel characteristics are overall length (OAL), beam and draft of the vessel in
loaded condition. Thesecharacteristics of fishery vessels using the harbour are a
prerequisite to design different water front structures as the fishery harbour is
meant for catering to the needs of various sizes of fishing vessels. The information
gathered on the draft of the fishing vessels vis-a-vis the OAL and beam of the
vessels operating at the harbour site are given in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1
Fishing vessel characteristics
Overall length of
vessel (m)
6.3
9
12
14
24
Depth of the Harbour
Draft (m)
Beam (m)
1.0
1.7
2.1
3.2
1.50
3.20
4.20
6.70
The dredge level of the harbour is proposed at -4.0 m which gives a depth of 3.84
m at MLWS. This provides a clearance of 0.64 m for 24 m boats having a draft of
3.20 m.
6.4
Design data
The details of the fleet using the harbour such as number of boats, overall length,
average landing, duration of each trip etc., are given in Table 6-2.
Page 82
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
200
39
2400
270
200
70
8
25
9000
270
200
70
10
20
90
1333
15m (Trawler)
24m (Tuna Long
Line)
100
50
No. of fishing
trips
1
6
1000
100
Duration of
each
trip(days)
No. of fishing
days
70
90
9m (FRP Boats)
12m (Gill Netter)
Rest days
No. of days in
fishing season
270
200
180
per boat (kg)
270
Landing
No. of vessels
Overall length
of vessel
Table 6-2
Design data
6.5
Computation of quay length for landing, idle-berthing, outfitting and
repair quays
In a fishery harbour, quays are required by the fishing vessels for various purposes
like fish landing, outfitting, idle-berthing and repair of vessels. The economical
lengths of these quays in the proposed fishery harbour are computed in the
following paragraphs based on the number and size of fishing vessels using the
harbour and average annual fish landings per vessel. In order to arrive at the quay
lengths, the following important assumptions are made:
 9m Motorised craft require beach landing.
 10% of the fishing fleet may not go out for fishing due to maintenance, repair
or some other reason.
 The 12 m, 15 m and 24m OAL Gill Netter, trawlers and Tuna Long Line
which go on 6,8and 10 days trip, will be equally distributed on each day with
same number of departures/arrivals.
 During peak season, 40% of 8m Motorised craft will arrive in a day with 20%
increase in fish catch (1 day trip).
 During peak season, 20% of the Gill Netter/trawlers may arrive in a day with
20% increase in fish catch.
 A uniform manual unloading rate of 4500 kg/hour is assumed for 12 m gill
netter, 15 m trawlersand 20m tuna long line.
 Permissible duration of fish landing by fishing vessels and outfitting these
vessels are reasonably assumed to be 6 and 8 hours respectively.
 The fish landing quay length for a fishing vessel consists of overall length of
the vessel in their category plus a free spacing of 10% of its overall length
between the boats to facilitate safe maneuvering.
Page 83
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
6.5.1 Landing quay length
The fish landing jetty lengths for the proposed harbour have been calculated
considering three average sizes of trawlers viz., 12 m, and 15 m OAL, their
duration of fishing trips, quantity of fish landed, time required for docking,
undocking of these vessels, unloading rate of the fish catch at the fish landing
quays and the duration of fish landing hours at the harbour.
a) 12m Gill Netter- 100 numbers (6-day fishing trip)
The number of boats operating
= 0.9 x 100 = 90 nos
The number of boats operating per day
= 90/6 = 15 nos.
Number of arrivals in a day during peak season
= 1.2 x 15 = 18
Average fish landing per boat
= 1333 kg
Peak fish landing per boat
= 1.2 x 1333 = 1600 kg
Time required for docking and undocking
= 4 + 4 = 8 min.
Time required for unloading at 4500 kg/hour
= 1600 x 60/4500
= 21.33 say 22 min.
Total time required
= 8 + 23
= 30
min.
No. of berths required to handle 18 vessels in 6 hours = 30 x 18/ (6 x 60)
= 1.5 say 2 nos.
Length of the fish landing quay required
= 2 x (12 +1.2)
= 26.4 m say 27 m
b) 15m Trawler- 100 numbers (8-day fishing trip)
The number of boats operating
= 0.9 x 100 = 90 nos
The number of boats operating per day
= 90/8 = 11.25
say12 nos.
Number of arrivals in a day during peak season
= 1.2 x 12
14.4 say15 nos.
Average fish landing per boat
= 2400 kg
Peak fish landing per boat
=
= 1.2 x 2400 = 2880 kg
Time required for docking and undocking
= 5 + 5 = 10 min.
Time required for unloading at 4500 kg/hour
= 2880 x 60/ 4500
=38.4 say 39 min
Total time required
= 10 + 39
= 49 min.
No. of berths required to handle 28 vessels in 6 hours = 15 x 49/ (6 x 60)
Page 84
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
= 2.04 say 3 nos.
Length of the fish landing quay required
= 3 x (15 +1.5) = 49.5 m
say50 m
c) 24m Trawler- 50 numbers (8-day fishing trip)
The number of boats operating
The number of boats operating per day
= 0.9 x 50 = 45 nos
= 45/8 = 5.625
say 6 nos.
Number of arrivals in a day during peak season= 1.2 x 6 = 7.2 say 8
nos.
Average fish landing per boat
Peak fish landing per boat
= 5000 kg
= 1.2 x 5000 = 6000 kg
Time required for docking and undocking
= 10 + 10 = 20 min.
Time required for unloading at 4500 kg/hour
= 6000 x 60/ 4500
=80 min
Total time required
= 20 + 80
= 90 min.
No. of berths required to handle 8 vessels in 6 hours = 8 x 90/ (6 x 60)
= 2 nos.
Length of the fish landing quay required
= 2 x (24 +2.4) = 52.8 m
say53 m
Landing Quay Length
(m)
12 m Gillnetter
27
15 m trawlers
50
24 m Tuna long line
53
Total
130
Fishing Vessel
6.5.2 Outfitting quay length
Before proceeding on a fishing trip, the 12 m and 15 m gillnetters and trawlers
collect fuel, fresh water and ice in addition to food provisions at the outfitting
quay. Considering the time taken by the boats to receive fuel, fresh water and ice,
the length of the outfitting quay has been worked out as follows:
a) 12 m size Gill Netter– 100 numbers conducting 6-day fishing trips
The number of boats operating
= 0.9 x 100 = 90 nos
The number of boats operating per day
= 90/6 = 15 nos.
Number of boats requiring outfitting in a day during peak season
Page 85
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
=1.2 x 15= 18 nos
Time taken on an average for each boat to receive fuel, ice and water
= 30 min.
Number of berths required for outfitting in 8 hours
= 18 x 30/(8 x 60)
= 1.125say 2 nos.
Length of outfitting quay required
= 2 (12 +1.2) = 26.4
m say 27m
b) 15 m size Trawlers– 100 numbers conducting 8 day fishing trips
The number of boats operating
= 0.9 x 100 = 90 nos
The number of boats operating per day
= 90/8 = 11.25
say12 nos.
Number of boats requiring outfitting in a day during peak season
= 1.2 x 12= 14.4 say15 nos
Time taken on an average for each boat to receive fuel, ice and water
= 30 min.
Number of berths required for outfitting in 8 hours
Length of outfitting quay required
= 15 x 30/(8 x 60)
= 0.93 say 1
no.
= 1 (15 +1.5) = 16.5 m say 17 m
c) 24 m size Trawlers – 50 numbers conducting 8 day fishing trips
The number of boats operating
= 0.9 x 50 = 45 nos
The number of boats operating per day
= 45/8
= 5.625
say 6 nos.
Number of boats requiring outfitting in a day during peak season
= 1.2 x 6= 7.2 say 8 nos
Time taken on an average for each boat to receive fuel, ice and water
= 40 min.
Number of berths required for outfitting in 8 hours
Length of outfitting quay required
Fishing Vessel
12 m Gillnetter
= 6 x 40/(8 x 60) =
0.5 say 1 no.
= 1 (24 +2.4) = 26.4 m say 27 m
Outfitting Quay Length
(m)
27
Page 86
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
15 m Trawlers
24 m Tuna long line
Total
17
27
71
6.5.3 Repair quay length
The 12 m and 15m Gill netter/ trawlers will need occasional repairs to their
engine/machinery and other parts onboard while they remain afloat. Keeping this
in view, repair quay of 30 m long exclusively for repairing one boat length for 12
m Gill netter and one boat length for 15m trawlers is provided.
12m Gill netter
= 1 (12+1.2) = 13.2 m say 14.0 m
15m Trawlers
= 1 (15+1.5) = 16.5 m say 17.0 m
24m Tuna long line = 1 (24+2.4) = 26.4 m say 27.0 m
Total length of repair quay/jetty required =14.0+17.0+27.0= 31.0 m
6.5.4 Idle-berthing quay length
During the non-fishing season and rough weather, the boats may seek shelter in the
harbour for which idle-berthing quays are to be provided.
a) 12 m Gill Netter - 100 numbers
Assuming that the 5 boats berth abreast
Total number of boats operating including the sick ones =100 nos
Assuming that the vessels are berthed five abreast
= 100/5
= 20 nos.
Total length of idle-berthing quay required = 20 (12 +1.2) = 264.0 m
Length available from landing and outfitting of 12 m vessels, for berthing
during non-fishing and rough weather times
= (27+27) = 54 m
Net berthing length required for 12 m size vessels
= 264 - 54 = 210 m
b) 15 m Trawlers - 100 numbers
Assuming that the 5 boats berth abreast
Number of boats operating including the sick ones = 100 nos.
Assuming that the vessels are idle-berthed five abreast = 100/5 = 20 nos.
Length of idle-berthing quay required = 20 (15+1.5) = 330.0m
Length available from landing and outfitting of 12 m vessels, for berthing
during non-fishing and rough weather times
= (50+17) = 67 m
Net berthing length required for 12 m size vessels
= 330 - 67 = 263 m
Page 87
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
c)
24 m Trawlers - 50 numbers
Assuming that the 5 boats berth abreast
Number of boats operating including the sick ones = 50 nos.
Assuming that the vessels are idle-berthed five abreast = 50/5 = 10 nos.
Length of idle-berthing quay required = 10 (24+2.4) = 264.0m
Length available from landing and outfitting of 24 m vessels, for berthing
during non-fishing and rough weather times
= (53+27) = 80 m
Net berthing length required for 12 m size vessels
= 264 - 80 = 184 m
Berthing Quay Length
(m)
12 m Gillnetter
210
15 m Trawlers
263
24 m Tuna long line
184
Total
657
Fishing Vessel
6.5.5 Total Quay Length
The summary of total quay length required for landing, outfitting, repair and berthing
of fishing vessels is as follows:
Table
Summary of quay lengths
24 m
Sl.
No.
Description
12 m Gill
Netter
15 m
Trawlers
Trawlers
1
Fish landing Quay
27
50
53
130
2
Outfitting Quay
27
17
27
71
3
Repair Quay
14
17
27
58
4
Idle-berthing Quay
210
263
184
657
Total
278
347
291
916
Total (m)
Landing, outfitting and berthing activities of traditional boats will take place at the
beach landing area. During non-fishing and rough weather conditions the boats are
hauled on to the land for idle berthing and for repairs.
6.6
Fishery harbourlayout
As seen from the table 6-2 above there are two types of boats i.e., motorised crafts
and mechanized fishing vessels (Trawlers, Gill Netter& Tuna Long Line). Fishing
Page 88
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Harbour requirements for both traditional and mechanized fishing vessels are
planned side by side. Motorised crafts require beach landing. Mechanized fishing
vessels require quays for fish landing and other activities.
The planning of different waterside and landside facilities to be provided in a
fishery harbour should be such that all necessary harbour components are placed in
an orderly manner. The flow of fishing boats normally taking place in a wellplanned fishery harbour is as described below:




The fishing boats arrive in the fishery harbour after their fishing voyage of
specified duration.
First, they go over to fish landing quay to unload the fish catch. After the
fish is unloaded in plastic crates, it is taken to the fish handling and auction
hall. There, it is washed, sorted, weighed and displayed in boxes for
auctioning. Then, it is packed with ice in the fish packing sections and
dispatched to the local fish markets for further fish processing. Some
quantities of wet fish may go for chilled store, freezing, canning etc., while
the trash fish is taken for making fish meal, fish manure or else to be used
in other allied fish industries.
Then, the boats move on to the idle-berthing quay for idle-berthing or to
repair quay for minor boat repair/engine repair till the next fishing trip.
Before departing the harbour on their next fishing trip, the fishing boats
take fuel, ice, fresh water and food provisions from the outfitting quay.
Keeping in mind the topographic and hydrographic features of the site, the
waterside and landside facilities are planned in a systematic manner following the
modular concept. The facilities connected with fish landing, outfitting, idleberthing, repair and public utility modules are grouped together so as to avoid
cross-traffic of fishing vessels on water side and movement of men and vehicular
traffic on land side.
Both waterside and landside facilities planned and designed are in tune with the
international standards for the hygienic fish handling and sanitation. In the fish
landing module Fish handling and auction halls for MFVs, Tuna & FRP boats, fish
loading area, parking area are provided. The idle-berthing jetties is placed next to
landing with the shore facilities like fishing gear sheds, fishermen's rest sheds, net
mending sheds etc. The outfitting quay is placed prior to the landing quay with
supply facilities like ice, fuel and fresh water delivery points so that, while
departing the vessels take fuel, water, etc. Repair quay is provided before
outfitting quay. In the Repair quay module boat repair shop is provided for minor
repairs. RC sloping hard, boat repair/parking yard are provided at the other end of
the harbour so that activities like major repairs, boat building can be carried out
smoothly. Adequate harbour basin area for the vessels is provided adjacent to
quays so that the safe manoeuvring of vessels approaching and leaving the berths
is possible.Apart from this, the fishery harbour layout provides for the following
landside facilities:
Page 89
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR





Administrative office, navigation aids and radio-communication centre,
restaurant, public toilet blocks, security/guard house, electric substation,
overhead tank for storing fresh water, facilities for storing and distribution
of fuel and fresh water on the outfitting quay side, boat repair shop,
fishermen gear sheds, net mending shed, fishermen rest sheds, community
hall, coastal police stationand fish drying yard.
Traffic area, loading area, approach road, internal roads and parking area
for both vehicles as well as for dry-stalking of fishing boats during non
fishing season.
Ice plant and chilled storage, civic amenity such as shopping complex.
Boat building and repair yard for undertaking repair of boats.
Reclaimed land area of 46.82 hectare for accommodating the necessary
landside facilities.
The fishery harbour layout incorporating the above harbour facilities is shown in
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03.
6.7
Waterside facilities
6.7.1 Training walls
The layout of the Northern and Southern training wall is shown in Drg.No.APJUVL /03.In order to finalise the alignment, length and design of training walls
sections, numerical model study and wave flume studies were conducted at
CWPRS for design of trunk portion of the breakwater at bed levels of 0 m, -1.0 m,
-2.0 m, -3.0 m, -4.0 m, and roundheads at -5.0 m.
Layout of the proposed fishery harbour consists of two training walls whichwould
be constructed normal to the shoreline up to -5.5 m depth contours.Length of
southern training wall would be about 615 m and length of northerntraining wall
would be about 835 m.
Width of approach channel in betweenthese two training walls would be about 90
m.Thedesign of cross-sections of breakwaters at different bed levels with tetrapods
inthe armour was finalized through wave flume studies,considering the design
wave condition at different bed levelsand the details of cross section of
breakwaters are shown in Drg. No. AP- JUVL /04.
6.7.2 Quay
Quay lengths required for fish landing, outfitting, idle-berthing and repair of
vessels are computed in paragraph 6.5.1 based on the fishery operations. Their
positions in the fishery harbour layout are planned in such a way that the fishing
vessels will operate and use the harbour facilities in an orderly and optimum
manner.
Page 90
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
The top level of the fish landing quay should be such that it should facilitate easy
unloading of fish baskets/boxes by manual labor during mean high water of
springs and there should be no overtopping of the quay during highest
astronomical tide. Keeping in view the requirement of 15 m trawlers and the tide
levels prevailing during spring and highest Astronomical tide level surmised at
site, the crest level of the fish landing and other quays like outfitting, idle-berthing
and repair are placed at R.L.+2.50 m with a clear freeboard of 1.34 m during
MHWS (+1.16 m).
The subsoil investigations conducted at site and laboratory results, it appears that
the soil layers up to 10 m depth is Silt sand of loose state and the soil layers from
10 m to 18 m depth consist of fine sand of medium state.
From the results of the subsoil investigations and from the point of view economic
cost, deck slab supported on RC Bored Piledstructure is proposed. The length of
the quay structure is 909m. The plan and cross-sections of the proposed quay is
shown in Drawing No.AP- JUVL /07.
The quay structure is provided with rubber tyre fenders at regular intervals along
the fish landing, outfitting, repair quays and idle-berthing quay including mooring
rings and bollards.
The following loadings have been assumed for the structural design of the RCC
bored pile type jetty structure.
Vertical
Horizontal
: Uniformly distributed load of 10 kN/m2.
: Perpendicular to the quay face, 1 kN/m.
To ensure free movement of fishermen over the quay surfaces, vehicles are not to
be permitted on quays structures. As such, vehicular loads are not considered in
the above design calculations.
6.7.3
Dredging and Disposal
Sufficient depth is required in the harbour basin area in order to ply and
manoeuvring of fishing boats. Dredging is required to be taken up to -4m level in
the harbour basin. Accordingly, 6.2 lakhs cum are required to be dredged for this
purpose.
The general ground level at proposed fishery harbour site is around RL +1.50 m.
In order to provide land based facilities, the area behind the quay is to be
reclaimed to RL +2.50 m for which 5,85,300 cum of earth is required. About
4,68,200 cum of the material obtained from the dredging in the harbour basin can
be utilised for reclamation of land to RL +2.00 m level. Remaining quantity of
1,56,190 cum can be dumped in the nearby low laying area, which can be used in
future for harbour expansion.
Page 91
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
6.7.4 RC Sloping hard
RC sloping hard is required for hauling of boats on to land for repair/dry stacking
etc. RC sloping hard of 30 m wide inside basin is proposed to haul up vessels
requiring regular maintenance and necessary repairs to hull, engines and also for
stacking of boats during non-fishing season. The slope of ramp is 1V:10H.
Sufficient space is provided behind the sloping hard for boat building, boat
parking and repair of vessels. The details of the RC sloping hard are shown
inDrg.No.AP- JUVL /21.
6.7.5 Revetment
The slope of the finished land reclamation on the waterside, behind the quay to a
length of 909 m and on rear side of the harbour complex would be protected by 60
cm thick hand packed rough stone revetment with 65 to 75 cm long through stones
at 1.50 m c / c over a backing of 45 cm thick graded filter media consisting of
sand, 10 mm and 40 mm size aggregate. Below the stone bedding layer, geo-textile
filter is provided. Stone revetment would have a slope of 1 V: 1.5H as shown in
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /22.
6.7.6 Navigational aids
Navigational aids are required for safe navigation of fishing vessels during both
night and day times. They are needed to demark the harbour entrance channel,
rocky outcrops in the vicinity of the harbour and also for visibility during night
times also, as fishers go or come back from fishing operations without any time
schedule. Vessel operators may wish to go for fishing either during day time or
night hours depending on the fishing grounds and knowledge of shoals. While
smaller boats of a day’s fishing trip would try to do fishing in near shore waters,
the bigger boats of multiple day voyages may go farther deep in the sea, and will
be in touch with the shore station.
At present there are no navigation aids in the harbour area. For the entrance
channel to be visible during night, marker/lighted buoys need to be installed for
ensuring safe navigation of fishing vessels. Therefore, Provision is made for the
navigation aids. However, the specific requirement and details need to be worked
out at the time of actual project implementation.
6.8
Landside facilities
6.8.1
Land reclamation
The highest astronomical tide (HAT) at Krishnapatnam which is the nearest Port is
+1.50 m. As such, the reclamation level is proposed at +2.5 m to prevent the
harbour area from inundation during highest tide levels/astronomical tides. The
average ground level is +1.50m m on the creek side. Based on this level, the
Page 92
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
quantum of land reclamation is of the order of 5,85,300 cum. About 4,68,200 cum of
the material obtained from the dredging in the harbour basin can be utilised for
reclamation of land to RL +2.00 m level and about 1,17,100 cum of good quality
borrowed earth or gravel is required for reclamation from RL +2.00 m to +2.50 m level.
Hence this dredged quantity is enough for reclamation for locating the shore-based
facilities in an area of 21.7 hectare as shown in the fishery harbour layout
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03.
6.8.2 Fish handling and auction hall
The modern fish handling and auction hall would be nerve centre of a fishery
harbour. The purpose of the fish handling and auction hall is to facilitate hygienic
fish handling, better sanitation keeping in mind the MPEDA guidelines and other
international Euro norms and HACCP practices pertaining to hygienic fish
handling. Separate Auction halls for MFVs and traditional boats are proposed. The
fish handling and auction hall is planned and designed to provide good scope for
ensuring fish quality, collection of statistics on quantum of fish being landed at the
harbour, monitoring of fishery resources etc. In the auction hall fresh fish landed
from boats is cleaned, sorted by species and size-wise, weighed, auctioned, iced,
packed. Then it will be distributed to the local, national and international markets.
Separate action halls and packing hall are provided to Mechanised Fishing
Vessels, Traditional crafts Tuna Boats and The plan, elevation and other details of
fish handling and auction halls are shown in Drg.No.AP - JUVL /08, Drg. No.AP
- JUVL /09 and Drg.No.AP - JUVL /10.To avoid fresh fish being exposed to sun
heat and to avoid long haulage of fish, the fish handling and auction hall is located
very close to fish landing quay.
The proposed fish handling and auction hall is covered from all sides by brick
walls with doors to provide security. The floor of the building would be provided
with durable, strong, semi-polished, chemical resistant, water-tight, non-skid white
kota/cudappa stone appropriate for industrial use. Inside wall surfaces are cladded
with ceramic tiles up to the lintel height. Instead of Kota/cudappa stone, non-skid
epoxy coated /granite flooring may also be most desirable.
The fish handling and auction hall, is divided into number of bays along the length
to make it suitable to carry out pre-processing activities including fish auctioning.
This would enable to move the unloaded fish from several boats at a time to fish
bays without exposing fish to sun heat, dust, dirt and other contaminants. The fish
workers would encounter with fish sorting tables to sort fish by grade, weight and
species-wise standing on either side of the table. Next to fish sorting tables, fish
display platforms with weighing scales are arranged so that fish boxes displaying
species, size and source could be readied for fish auction to take place without
wasting time.
Thereafter, fish packing space are provided in the same line adjoining fish loading
area to move fish catch in a linear fashion right from the quay face to fish loading
area undergoing all the pre-processing activities. In this way, criss-cross
Page 93
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
movement of fish transfer from one place to the other is avoided. All the fish
washing tanks, sorting tables, fish display platforms and fish packing tables would
be topped with ceramic tiles.
Quantum of water required in fish handling and auction hall for cleaning fish, floor
cleaning and fish box washing would be manifold compared to fresh water
required for personal use. Therefore, instead of fresh water, clean and bacteria-free
seawater would be used in all the fish cleaning/floor washing operations.
Together with seawater supply system, the building will have arrangement for
supply of fresh water for people working in the building. Separate fresh water lines
will be laid for this purpose. The seawater and freshwater supply lines would be
colour-coded to distinguish between the two supply lines. Pipes and pipe fittings
including valves would be of UV stabilized and sanitized PVC/HDPE pipes and
fittings to avoid marine corrosion.
Auction hall area calculations
To keep the fish display areas of the building neat, clean and cool, the fish display
area are planned off the floor on the raised concrete platforms (0.15 m above the
floor level) with drains in the middle of the hall with inspection passages provided
for buyers and auctioneers who would not be stamping fish while moving round
the fish display platforms. These fish display areas in 4.6 m x 2.6 m to hold at least
4.16 tonne of fish arranged in 13 rows and 4 columns of fish boxes in two levels
with a net weight of each fish box taken as 40 kg. In case of more fish catch
coming into the fish auction hall, fish boxes can even be piled up to three layers,
provided care is taken to ensure that fishes in the under layered crates are not
crushed.
The basis for arriving at the plinth area is given below:
1) Fish auction hall area for MFV’s
i)
12m Gill Netter of 6 days fishing trip with average fish landings of 1333
kg – 100 nos
The number of boats operating per day = (0.9 x 100) / 6
= 15 nos
Number of arrivals in an hour during a peak day =1.2 x 15/6
Average fish landing per boat
Peak fish landing per boat
= 3 nos.
= 1563 kg
= 1.2 x 1333 = 1,599.6 kg
say 1,600kg
Total fish landing from 3 boats
ii)
= 3 x 1600
= 4800 kg
15 m trawlers of 8 days fishing trip with average fish landings of 2400
kg - 100 nos.
The number of boats operating per day = (0.9 x 100) / 8
= 11.25
Page 94
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
say12 nos
Number of arrivals in an hour during a peak day =1.2 x 12/6= 2.40
say3 nos.
Average fish landing per boat
= 2400 kg
Peak fish landing per boat
= 1.2 x 2400 = 2880 kg
Total fish landing from 3 boats
= 3 x 2880
= 8,640 kg
Total quantity of fish catch landed during peak hour
(in tonnes)
1
12 m Gill Netter (6 days fishing trip)
4.80
2
15 m Trawlers (8 days fishing trip)
Total
Say
8.64
13.44
13.5 t
It is assumed that 50% of the fresh fish landed at the fishery harbour is likely to be
taken into the fish handling and auction hall and remaining 50% will be trash fish
meat for fish drying, fish meal etc.
Total fresh fish coming in to the auction hall = 13.50 x 0.50 = 6.75 tonne/hour
Since, the fish auctioning process for each batch may take about 1.5 to 2 hours,
fish catch landed during 2 hours (i.e. 6.75 x 2 = 13.50 tonne) is considered for the
computation of plinth area of fish auction hall.
The size of each fish box is 0.60 m x 0.40 m x 0.30 m. Each fish display area of
4.6 m x 2.6 m will hold at least 2.6 tonne of fish when arranged in13 rows and 4
columns of fish boxes in two levels with a weight of each fish box taken as 25 kg.
Number of bays required = 13.5/ 2.6 =5.19 say 6 bays
Hence it is proposed to provide a fish handling and auction hall of six bays for
MFVs. The proposed area of each auction hall is 779sqm.
2) Tuna Fish Handling, Grading and Packing Unit
Tuna fish consumed in chilled form need to be carefully handled, preserved and
properly transported as tuna is a scombroid fish and the time and temperature
above the normal fish would lead to Histamine poisoning (with symptoms like
skin rash, edema, localized inflammation, gastro intestinal and neurological
problems) in the end consumer.
Tuna Fish Handling, Grading and Packing Unit Area
24 m size Tuna Boat –50 numbers (8 days Trip)
Number of boats operating
= 0.9x50 = 45
24 m size vessels being Trawlers of 8 days fishing trip,
their arrivals per day
= 45/8 = 5.625 say 6 nos.
Peak arrivals in a day
= 6 x 1.2 = 7.2 say 8 nos.
Page 95
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Avg. landing per boat
Peak landing per boat
Total landing from 8 boats
= 5,000 kg.
= 1.2 x 5,000 = 6,000 kg
= 8 x 6000 = 48,000 kg
Or say 48 tonne per day
As per estimates a chilled tuna handling / packing centre, at the rate of 10 sq. m
per worker, 100 sq. m unit can employ 10 workers and a unit with a 200 sq. m can
employ 20 workers.
A worker can handle a maximum of 400 Kg chilled fish per hour and during a shift
he can handle 3.2 tones. A unit with 15 workers can handle 48 tonne per day. A
unit with an area of 200sq. m can handle 128 tonne per day.
Hence area of Tuna Fish Handling, Grading and Packing Unit required
= 48/128*200 = 75 sq.m
The various components required for such facilities include handling / packing
facility with unidirectional flow to avoid contamination, chill room, workers
facilities like change room, toilets, rest room, flake ice making units, water
purification system, effluent treatment system etc.
Further, the tuna handling / packing facility should be ideally situated close to the
fish landing centers preferably having access to water bodies to enable landing of
the catch from the fishing vessel /boat / crafts in the vicinity of the handling and
packing units.
It is proposed to build one Tuna Fish Handling, Grading and Packing Centre of
size 52.73 m x 21.23 m of area 1119.46 sqm as shown in Drg.No. AP - JUVL /09.
3) Fish auction hall area for traditional crafts
i)
9 m Motorised craft of2 day fishing trip with average fish landings of
250 kg - 1000 nos.
The number of boats operating per day = 0.9 x 1000/2
= 450 nos.
Number of arrivals in a day during peak hour = 1.2x 450/6 = 90 nos.
Average fish landing per boat
= 250 kg
Peak fish landing per boat
= 1.2 x 250
Total landing from 90 boats
= 90 x 300
= 300kg
= 27,000 kg
or27 tonnes
It is assumed that 25% of the fresh fish landed at the beach landing is likely to
be taken into the fish handling and auction hall and remaining 75% will be trash
fish meat for fish drying, fish meal, etc.
Page 96
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Total fish coming into the auction hall would be 27 x 0.25 = 6.75 tonnes.
Total fish coming into the auction hall per hour would be 6.75 tonne.
Since, the fish auctioning process for each batch may take about 1.5 to 2 hours,
fish catch landed during 2 hours will be 6.75 x 2 = 13.50 tonne is considered for
computation of the plinth area of fish auction hall. The size of each fish box is 0.60
m x 0.40 m x 0.30 m.
Each fish display area of 4.6 m x 2.6 m will hold at least 2.2 tonne of fish when
arranged in 11 rows and 4 columns of fish boxes in two levels with a weight of
each fish box taken as 25 kg
Number of bays required = 13.50/2.2 = 6.14 say 6 bays
Hence it is proposed to provide one auction hall of six bays for traditional boats.
The total area of proposed auction halls is 360 sqm.
Fish will be displayed on the platforms of 4.6 m x 2.6 m area in boxes for buyers
to know about the fish species, grade, weight and who supplied it. There, the
auction field staff could assess the quality and quantity of fish being sold in
auction and keep track of the quantum of fish landings. Each auction process with
fish coming in batches is expected to last at least for 1.5 to 2 hours during which
time all the pre-processing operations like washing, sorting, weighing, auctioning
and fish packing with ice including loading of fish in the waiting refrigerated vans
could be completed. Fish transported from the fishery harbour complex is only in
the form of fresh fish as further fish processing for export is done elsewhere in the
fish processing plants.
After each batch of fish is handled and auctioned, cleaning and disinfecting of
floors, walls and fish boxes would be done with chlorinated seawater by wall
mounted or hand pulled high-pressure cleaners for effective cleaning as well as
water saving measure. Thus, clean fish boxes/crates could be made available to the
fish sellers at a nominal cost and stored back into box store rooms at the end of
each auction hall. After auction, buyers would collect their purchases and head to
the fish packing area for ice packing in plastic crates.
The floor finish level within the building would be higher by 0.45 m above the
quay surface for better drainage. The fish handling and auction hall would have
sewerage and drainage arrangements for washed water from fish washing tanks,
floors and sewage from toilets. All the drainage and sewage lines from the fish
handling and auction hall would be connected to the underground sewer system.
Within the building, internal drains would run length-wise and breadth-wise to
collect washed water and prevent floor becoming wet and slippery. Since the
drains are likely to be frequently blocked by fish wastes, the drains provided are of
open type, but covered with galvanized steel metal grids/gratings or perforated
Page 97
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
concrete slabs so that the top covering can be easily removed and replaced during
inspection and cleaning operations. These internal drains would be provided with
suitable water-sealed chambers at the junctions to prevent drains clogging from
fish waste/offal and foul smell emanating from the drains.
Necessity for chilled storage facilities for the excess fish catch not sold on a
particular day’s auction might arise during the operation of fish handling and
auction hall. For this reason, the building provides for insulated rooms for
overnight storage of ice fish. A separate room is provided to install DG set to be
used during power breakdown to provide continuous power supply.
Within the fish handling and auction hall, adequate windows and ventilators would
be provided to allow for natural light and ventilation in addition to exhaust fans
fixed at the lintel height below the false ceiling. Windows and ventilators would be
adequately screened with nylon/ aluminium nets/ curtains and doors provided with
mechanical air curtains to prevent the ingress of insects like flies, mosquitoes and
birds. In addition to general lighting of the building, the fish display, fish packing,
management room and other areas needing care would be well lit by providing
special anti-glare type hanging lights of adequate luminosity with shadow covers.
This would help to conduct fish handling, icing and auctioning operations even
during night hours.
The front and back of fish handling and auction hall on the fish landing quayside
and fish loading areas would be well lit with high mast lights. Since the fish
unloading operations could take place during day as well as night hours, the
building is provided with a centralized uninterrupted electric supply in the form of
standby diesel gen-set for lighting the building and surrounding areas, besides
normal electric power supply.
6.8.3 Fish loading area
Behind the fish handling and auction hall and adjacent to fish packing rooms, fish
loading areas with sun shade are provided to enable vehicles including the
refrigerated vans to approach the fish auction hall from behind for transportation
of auctioned fish to consuming markets. The extent of concrete surface in fish
loading area with FRP sun shade structure is 936 sq.m. The fish loading area is of
concrete surface for the entire length of fish handling and auction hall to withstand
the vehicle loads and spillage of water which is shown in fishery harbour layout
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. The surface of the fish loading areas would be given
suitable slope towards drains to avoid forming wet, slippery conditions at the fish
loading place. The cross section of concrete surface is shown in Drg.No. APJUVL /22.
After fish auctioning process, fish will be packed in fish boxes with crushed ice in
the fish packing rooms and then loaded into the waiting vans/trucks to be taken to
local fish markets and fish processing plants located elsewhere. Instead of carrying
Page 98
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
fish in open vehicles, refrigerated vans/trucks would be insisted from the fish
transporters to preserve the quality and freshness of fish.
6.8.4 Fishery Administrative office
Fishery administrative office is necessary for the management and maintenance of
harbour facilities, for regulating activities relating to fishery industry such as fish
handling and auction hall, fish prices and the movement of fishing vessels in and
out of the harbour. Fishery Administrative Officer along with his supporting staff
is expected to work from this office to look after the day-to-day activities. As such,
the proposed fishery harbour complex provides for a fishery administrative office
having a plinth area of 186 sq.m as shown in the harbour layout Drg.No. APJUVL /03. The building islocated in the heart of fishery harbour complex.
Fishery administrative office provides for staff rooms, record room, toilet etc. The
plan and elevation of administrative office are shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /11.
In case, additional building area is required at a later stage, the State Fisheries
Department may go for additional floors.
6.8.5 Fishermen’s Gear sheds
Between the rest days of the fishing voyages and during non fishing season, some
fishing vessel operators for security reasons may prefer to keep their fishing gear
in the fish gear sheds instead of keeping in the fishing vessels. As such, fishing
gear storage cabins with locking arrangements are required to be provided in a
fishery harbour. For this purpose, a limited number of fishing gear storage sheds
(proposed innine blocks each having 12 cabins with a plinth area of 161 sqm) for
250 fishing vessel operators are proposed in the fishery harbour complex as shown
in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. The nine blocks have a total plinth area of 1451.70
sq.m. The basis for arriving at the plinth area of the gear storage sheds is that each
fishing boat operator would need 10 sqm of floor space for storing gears and
tackles. For this reason, each cabin provided is of 3.75 m X 3 m in floor area with
additional racks provided for storing petty items like paints, lubricants, hooks,
floats etc.
These nine blocks are located central to idle-berthing quay so that the fishing boat
operators need not have to carry the heavy gears and tackles for a long distance
and can keep the fishing gear in safe custody in the gear sheds under lock. In
addition to the above there is provision for one more fishermen’s gear shed to be
constructed in future as shown in the fishery harbour layout. The plan and
elevation of the fishermen gear shed are shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /12.
6.8.6 Net mending sheds
Page 99
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Fishing nets would become wet and damaged to some extent after each trip. As
such, a top covered net mending shed with open on all four sides is required for
the fishermen to repair their damaged nets sitting under the sunshade. Therefore,
four net mending sheds of a total plinth area of 827.8 sqm are provided in the
fishery harbour complex. Each net mending shed is of 10.23 m wide and 20.23 m
long with a plinth area of 206.95 sqm in addition to open land space of over 1,000
sq.m on either side of the net mending shed for spreading and drying of nets.
These net mending sheds are aligned longitudinally more or less in the east-west
direction so that the fishermen sitting under the open net mending shed are not
exposed to direct sunlight and are located behind the idle-berthing quay as shown
in harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03.
The building plan and elevation of the net mending shed is shown in Drg.No.APJUVL /13. The basis for arriving at the plinth area of the net mending sheds is
that each boat would need 3 sq.m of floor space for net mending. Dwarf cut-off
wall provided in the middle of the net mending sheds in the longitudinal direction
divides the floor space in two halves so that the floor can be effectively used by
the fishermen for spreading of their nets on either side of the net mending shed.
6.8.7 Boat Repair shops
Twoboat repair shopsof total plinth area of 190.68 sqm are provided. One repair
shop is at Repair Quay for attending minor repairs and another at boat
building/boat repair area for attending to all types of repairs including
electrical/electronic/mechanical repairs, checking up of lubricants and cooling
system of the engines of fishing vessels in addition to boat building activities as
may be seen in the harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. The building plan and
elevation of the boat repair shop are shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /14.
The building has the office space for workshop supervisor and his support staff
together with essential mechanical and electrical repairs/maintenance sections,
stores etc., to undertake the necessary boat repair/boat building activities.
6.8.8 Restaurant
Restaurant is required for those working in the fishery harbour premises and
visitors to have refreshment and food. As such, a restaurant of 127.70 sq.m plinth
area is provided in the public utility module of the fishery harbour complex near
administrative office building. The proposed restaurant has kitchen, store, service
in addition to terrace and lawn space and other provision for public conveniences
like waiters room, wash basins, water closet/urinals etc. Drg.No.AP- JUVL /16
gives the details of restaurant building.
For the sake of public health, hygiene and to provide nutritional food, the
restaurant would be maintained in clean condition with greeneries and kept under
regular supervision. The location of restaurant is shown in the harbour layout
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03.
Page 100
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
6.8.9 Fishermen Rest shed
The fishermen need rest after they come from each fishing trip, unloading,
auctioning process etc. Fishermen job is hard and fatiguing and they have to leave
at night or early morning hours for fishing when the conditions for fishing voyages
are favorable. They are also required to keep watch on their boats lying on the
quayside. There would also be homeless fishermen who have temporarily migrated
from other fishery centres and made their fishing base from Juvvaladinne fishery
harbour during the peak fishing season. Therefore, rest shed for fishermenis needed
for resting/recreation purposes. As such, three fishermen rest shed of each 213.44
sqm plinth area is provided in the harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03.
Details of fishermen rest shed are shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /17. The rest shed
is provided with facilities like bathing, washing, toilet and urinals for the
occupants. These rest sheds would also be useful as fishermen community centres
for multi-purpose activities.
6.8.10 Public Toilet blocks
From the sanitation point of view and essentially for maintaining a cleaner fishery
harbour, adequate lavatories, urinals and bathing facilities need to be provided
near places where people tend to concentrate in large numbers. For this purpose,
threepublic toilet blocks each with a plinth area of67.73 sq.m are proposed, one
each near beach landing area and the other near ETP as shown in the harbour
layout Drg.No. AP- JUVL /03. These provisions are in addition to the usual toilet
and bathing facilities provided in the fishermen's rest sheds and other buildings.
The interior details of the toilet block are shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /18and
modeled to operate on pay and use basis so that toilets are managed and
maintained in a clean and hygienic manner. The toilet provides for public
conveniences like lavatories, urinals and bathing facilities to both sections of
ladies and gents.
6.8.11
Fish Merchants Dormitory
Dormitory facility would be needed for the fish merchants, traders operating from
the fishery harbour and for those visiting harbour on regular business trips. Since
Juvvaladinne fishery harbour site is located 25 km away from Kavali the nearest
town, lodging and boarding facilities would be desirable right at the fishery
harbour project site so that the business community is able to coordinate their
activities from within the fishery harbour complex. As such, a fish merchant’s
dormitory of 265.77 sq.m plinth area is provided within the fishery harbour
complex as shown in harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03.
The building provides for single/double rooms and dormitory hall to accommodate
more persons. Further, dining facilities, reception, waiting lounge, kitchen, store
Page 101
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
for food provisions, dish wash, bathing, toilet facilities etc., are added to the
dormitory. Since the dormitory would be built on a framed column structure, more
floors can be added later, if found necessary. Details of dormitory building are
shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /15.
6.8.12
Commercial Complex
Fishermen require many items such as fish nets, baskets, sinkers, buoys, anchors,
ropes, automobile/machinery parts/products etc., for their fishing vessels and gear.
The fishermen also need to carry food provisions before going on a fishing trip.
Therefore, marine supply and provisions stores are required to be set up in the
fishery harbour complex. It is also necessary for the mechanised fishing vessels to
possess onboard electronic equipment such as fish finder, echo sounder, walkietalkies, radio, electronic position finder etc. Therefore, instrument and radio shops
for sales/servicing and facilities to repair these electrical and electronic gadgets if
available within the fishery harbour complex would avoid fishing vessel operators
to go in search of such services to cities.
Apart from the above services, the proposed fishery harbour needs civic amenities
such as food courts/outlets, tea/coffee and soft drink dispensers, fast food counters,
post and telegraph facilities including telephone, telex, fax and e-mail and internet
cafes, medical stores and health services, financial institutions such as banks
preferably with automated teller machines (ATMs), institutions extending
credit/insurance services etc. Since large number of people congregate in a fishery
harbour during peak fishing season, a police outpost may be necessary to maintain
law and order and to thwart any untoward incidents effectively.
To meet the above demands, provision is made for construction of Commercial
complex in the proposed fishery harbour and as shown in harbour layout
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. Three floored building of a total plinth area of 809.70
sqm is proposed and is shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /24.
6.8.13
Coastal Police Station
To strengthen the security along the costline and harbour complex and in
accordance to a nation-wide initiative to enhance security along the coastal areas,
it is proposed to set up coastal police station in the harbour. The coastal police
force will be helpful in dealing the security of the coasts and conduct patrolling in
the sea up to 5 mautical miles and address the critical gap in the policing of our
Coast and close Coastal waters by providing the State Police Forces the capability
to Police close Coastal waters and the Coast line. i.e. the Sea border of the country.
The subject of Coastal Security assumes importance and the Coastal Security
Scheme is one of the means for strengthening our ability to prevent and curb the
terrorist and anti- national activities. The detail of the building with plinth area of
about 121.60 sm is shown in Drg No.AP- JUVL /25.
6.8.14
Community Hall
Page 102
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Community Centres provided fishers with the opportunity to work and organise
together for the benefit of their local communities, including adult education,
social and cultural activities, Constitutes a meeting place for voluntary
organisations or other groups in the community which need accommodation.
Hence provision is made for construction of one community hall of plinth area of
746.40 sqm and the details are shown in Drg No.AP- JUVL /26.
6.8.15 Radio-communication tower
A radio-communication tower is very much required in a fishery harbour to
coordinate the shore-to-ship and ship-to-shore communication between the fishing
vessels, to keep watch and regulate fishing vessel’s movements within the fishery
harbour complex, to disseminate information to fishermen relating to exact fishing
grounds, movement of fish shoals, navigation hazards etc., and to guide/extend
necessary assistance to the fishing boats making distress calls from far off sea.
Radio-communication tower is proposed near the outfitting quay module which is
central to the quays on the waterside as shown in harbour layout Drg.No. APJUVL /03. The radio-communication tower of a total built up area of 83 sq.m in
ground and first floor shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /19would be equipped with
skilled technicians, VHF instruments and other equipment to provide round-theclock service and two-way communication to fishing boat operators. The radiocommunication tower would make necessary arrangements for display of signals,
flags and lamps to provide useful weather information and cyclone warning services
to fishermen community and caution them not to venture in to the sea during rough
weather conditions. In addition, the radio-communication tower would also be
used to monitor the weather parameters and thus act as a local meteorological
observatory station whose results and findings could be used by fishery harbour
authorities and other user departments.
6.8.16 Security/Guard house and Compound wall
Security/guard house is needed to check the entry and exit of vehicles and visitors
in the fishery harbour complex. It also serves to ensure that the vehicles carrying
fish loads and other fish products leave the harbour premises after paying the toll
tax/fee. Guard house proposed is of 27.2 sq.m plinth area whose details are shown
in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /20.
Further, the proposed fishery harbour complex is to be secured from intruders and
squatters. As such, it is proposed to provide a compound wall of 1420 m on the
landside to provide security for the fishery harbour complex. Harbour layout
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03shows the location of security/guard house at the main
entrance gate to fishery harbour complex and the extent of compound wall. The
compound wall is of 230 mm thick brick masonry wall in CM 1:6 with 150 mm
thick concrete coping at top. Over the compound wall barbed wire fence is
provided. Cross section of compound wall is shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /22.
Page 103
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
6.8.17Approach road and internalroads
Presently there is approach road only upto Juvvaladinne village. Another one
kilometer length of approach road is required to reach the site. Within the fishery
harbour complex, the internal roads of sufficient width to cater to two-lane traffic
are proposed. Both double lane and single lane asphalted roads are proposed.
These roads are proposed to be of asphalted road. The road sections are shown in
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /22. The roads demarcate the limit of utility buildings and
areas. The road widths shown in the harbour layout drawing include the pedestrian
path over the covered storm drains and vehicular traffic lanes. The length of road
proposed are 2403m double lane and 391m single lane, in addition to 1000m of
approach road. The arrangement of internal road network is shown in Drg.
No.AP- JUVL /03.
6.8.18Parkingareas for vehicles
Traders and consumers visit the fishery harbour daily on their vehicles like trucks,
vans, auto rickshaws, scooters, bi-cycles, tri-cycles etc., for buying, collecting and
transporting fish and fish products to nearby fish markets and consuming centres.
In addition, there will be vehicles connected with the fishery industry bringing ice
and other commodities. Therefore, adequate vehicle parking area in the form of
concrete surface is provided separatelybehind theproposed fish auction halls for
MFVs as well as for traditional boats.
The total area earmarked for vehicle parking behind the proposed fish auction halls
in concrete surface of 8749Sq.m is shown in harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL
/03. The cross section ofWBM surface is shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /22. In
addition, the buildings located within the fishery harbour complex provide for
enough space to accommodate vehicle parking areas within the plot areas
designated for these buildings.
6.8.19 Boat Parking/Repair yard
During non fishing season, some of the migratory fishing vessels from
Juvvaladinne fishery harbour may like to return to their original base whereas the
native fishing boats will be parked in the fishery harbour complex. During this
period, the fishing boats need to be pulled on to shore for regular maintenance and
repairs to hull, engine etc.
For the above purposes, open land space of 24,142.8 sqm is provided for parking
and repair of boats. The extent of land provided is sufficient for orderly parking of
at least 200 boats belonging to Juvvaladinne region out of the total MFVs of 250
numbers. The boat parking/repair yards have maneuvering lanes of WBM roads of
adequate width for transportation of boats. Thus, the transfer of fishing vessels
from water to land to their designated plots in the yard through RC sloping hard
and vice-versa is made easy. Further, the individual boat parking/repairing plots
Page 104
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
have enough land space on all the four sides for conveniently attending to boat
repair/parking. Repair quay is provided in the layout as shown will be used for
engine and other small repairs. The boat parking/repair yard is shown in harbour
layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. From the cost considerations, the roads within the
boat parking/repair yard would be of WBM surface whose cross sectional details
are shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /22.
6.8.20 Boat building and timber yard
Provision of total area of 2600 sqm is made for building as many as six boats at a
time in the fishery harbour in the form of open plots. Since the fishing industry is
proving to be a flourishing and profitable business fully backed by the
State/Central governments, new fishing boats are built year after year availing
government loan/subsidies/grants. It will be more so, when the proposed
construction of Juvvaladinne fishery harbour is complete, adding vigor and
impetus to the fishery activities in the surrounding fishery centres.
The plot area provided in each boat building yard has sufficient open space for
mobilising/demobilising of the workmen, machinery etc. The boat building yards
are located close to the sloping hard as shown in harbour layout Drg.No.APJUVL /03 so that launching of new fishing vessels from land to water is possible
with least effort and time. Essential facilities like timber yard, boat repair shop etc.,
required for boat building activities are also located closer to the boat building
yard. The land spaces provided would be leased out to prospective boat builders
and private entrepreneurs. The boat building yard would be of WBM surface
whose cross sectional details are shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /22.
6.8.21
Fresh water supply and distribution system
During the operation of fishery harbour, fresh water supply must be adequate to
meet the requirements of fishing vessels to carry on their fishing trips, for
production of ice, industrial and domestic use. The water used by vessels, fish
industries, domestic purposes and ice making must be potable and of accepted
drinking water standards.
Daily fresh water requirement for the fishery harbour is computed below:
A.
For Motorised Craft
9 m Motorised Craft conducting 2 day fishing trip at 50 litres/boat/day
= 1000/2 x 50 = 25,000 litres
B.
For Fishing vessels
12 m &15m Gillnetter/trawler vessels conducting 6&8 days fishing trip at
250 litres/boat/day
= (100/6 x 250)+ (100/8 x 250 ) = 7,292 say 7,500 litres
C.
For Fishing vessels
Page 105
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
24m tuna long line vessels conducting 8 days fishing trip at 500
litres/boat/day
= (50/8 x 500) = 3125say 3200 litres
C.
For ice plant (20 tonne ice capacity/day)
Considering 2 days reserve ice capacity, 20,000 litres x 2 days = 40,000
litres
D.
For fishermen and fishery industry people working within the fishery
harbour complex.
5,000 Nos. x 15 litres/day = 75,000 litres
E. For future fish processing industries to be located within the fishery
harbour complex
Fresh water requirement in the fish processing industries will be nearly 2 to 3
times the fish to be handled in these plants. Since the exact capacity of these
industries is not known at present, freshwater requirement is tentatively taken
as 50,000 litres.
Total daily fresh water requirement (A+B+C+D+E)
= (25,000+7,500+3,200+40,000+75,000+50,000) = 2,00,700 litres
Provide two Over Head Tank (ELSR) of capacity 1.0 lakh litres pumping twice
daily.
The proposed fishery harbour complex has provision for two overhead water tank
capacity of 100 K-litres. Similar one sump (GLSR of 60,000 liters capacity is
provided.A separate pumping station with freshwater distribution system is
provided in the fishery harbour. Fresh water would be pumped 2 times daily from
the ground water sumps and stored in the overhead tank. Uninterrupted power
supply to pump freshwater from the sumps is ensured through electric power
failing which diesel gen-set would supply the required power to pump water from
the sump at any time.
Bulk supply of freshwater to fishing boats at the outfitting quay is provided by
extending water pipes to the quay face and making available the required number
of fresh water outlets. The freshwater overhead tank is located close to the
outfitting module as shown in Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03such that fresh water can be
distributed to outfitting quay, fish auction hall and other buildings.
The demand for freshwater for maintaining greeneries and for boat washing would
be fully/partially met from the proposed rainwater harvesting system within the
fishery harbour complex. For this, surface runoff from the concrete paved surfaces,
hard surfaces and from storm water drains provided on either side of the internal
road sections would be collected and stored in the concrete rainwater collection
sumps at suitable places in the fishery harbour complex.
Page 106
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
6.8.22 Sea water supply and distribution system
Quantum of water required in fish handling and auction hall for cleaning fresh
fish, floor cleaning and fish box washing would be manifold compared to water
required for personal use. Therefore, clean and bacteria-free seawater could be
used for cleaning of fish, floor cleaning and fish box washing to save fresh water.
Therefore, clean and bacteria free seawater drawn from the shallow tube wells is
proposed as an alternative. The daily requirement of seawater in the fishery
harbour is computed as below:
1. Fish washing
Taken at 1 litre/kg of fish handled in auction hall in peak season per day
={ (1000 x 250 x 1x0.9x1.2)+ (100x1333 x 1x0.9x1.2) + (100 x 2400 x
1x0.9x1.2) +(50x5000x1x0.9x1.2) }
= (2,70,000+ 1,43,964+ 2,59,200 + 2,70,000
= 9,43,164 litres
2. Cleaning of fish auction hall premises
Taken at 5 litres/sq.m of floor area/day (considering 50% less for high
pressure cleaning systems)
= 0.5(779+360+1119)
= 743 litres
3. Fish box washing
Taken at 10 litres/box/ day (considering 50% less for high pressure cleaning
system)
= 10 x 0.50(52x2 x5) + 10 x 0.5(24 x 2 x 17)=2600 + 4080 = 6,680 litres
Total = 9,43,164 + 743 + 6,680 = 9,50,587 litres
A separate pumping station with seawater distribution system is proposed in the
fishery harbour. Unpolluted and bacteria-free seawater would be pumped from the
shallow tube well through electric power failing which diesel gen-set would
supply the required power to pump water from the tube well to provide
uninterrupted water supply.
In places like boat parking/repair yard, boat building and timber yard where
wooden boats and wood articles are stored, there is always the possibility of fire
mishaps. In order to fight fire, seawater would be quite economical and avoid
wastage of potable water for such purposes. In addition, quantity of seawater could
always be substantiated by pumping seawater for more hours.As part of seawater
distribution, fire hydrants would be installed at strategic locations all along the
boat building and boat parking/repair yards.
Page 107
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
6.8.23 Drainage/Sewerage and wastewater treatment system
The storm and surface water from road surface would be collected in the storm
water drains proposed along both sides of roads. The sewage water from the fish
handling and auction hall and other shore based infrastructures of the entire fishery
harbour complex need pre treatment before disposal. As such it would be
necessary to have separate drainage and sewerage systems for both storm water
and sewage. Effluent collected from the fish handling and auction hall at the end
of the sewers would be given secondary treatment in a specially built effluent
treatment facility to be set up at one corner of the fishery harbour complex and the
output of the treatment plant after treatment to tolerable limits will be discharged
into the sea water.
The wastewater treatment plant would include fully covered RC tanks for
collecting effluent water taking into account hydraulic gradient, site elevation and
outfall conditions of Malad creek, screening, grit removal, settling tank, desledging tank, filtering through up-flow filter bed device and finally disinfect the
overflowing effluent in chlorine dozing tank or by UV radiation before letting the
same through outfall to Malad creek. Outfall would be designed hydraulically to
meet the future design flows. The wastewater treatment plant would be designed to
be aesthetically attractive and visually compatible with the surrounding area and
land uses.
The conceptual layout of the wastewater treatment system in a plot area of 1560
sq.m sufficient for the installation of the required capacity of wastewater treatment
system is shown in fishery harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. However, the
specific requirement and details of the wastewater treatment system need to be
worked out at the time of actual project implementation. Other buildings in the
fishery harbour complex with conveniences like WC/urinal, bath and wash water
have facility for primary treatment in septic tanks of appropriate size and in turn
connected to municipal sewerage system. Sewer lines, inspection chambers and
manholes would be built wherever required in the fishery harbour complex to
collect and guide sewage.
Provision made for the solid/wet waste collection includes the air-tight PVC
containers and receptacles placed in strategic locations of the fishery harbour
depending on the type of solid waste (organic and inorganic) being generated in
the fishery harbour complex. On the quayside, spent engine oil would be collected
in special double-walled containers and placed inside the spent engine oil
reception shed located near the outfitting facilities.
Similarly, by the side of the spent engine oil reception shed, provision is made for
the collection of toxic waste such as lead acid starter batteries, dry cells etc.,
protected from sun and rain in a toxic waste reception shed, where water-tight
containers are placed until the toxic waste is taken out for further disposal. Bilge
Page 108
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
oil water separator is placed at one corner of the outfitting quay where bilge water
would be pumped from the fishing boats in to the bilge oil water separator for
removal of oil from the water. The location of the spent engine oil reception shed,
toxic waste reception shed and the bilge water separator are shown in the fishery
harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03.
The storm water drains for surface water runoff built on either side of the road are
covered with pre-cast concrete slabs to serve as pedestrians’ foot-path.
6.8.24 Electric power and lighting system
During peak fishing season the fishery harbour is expected to be operative round
the clock. Hence, fish landing, outfitting, idle-berthing jetties and repair quays
need to be well lit for easy access by the fishermen and fishing boats. Walkways
and approaches to the fish landing, outfitting, idle-berthing jetties and repair quays
need to be lighted for safety and security reasons. Power plug points need to be
provided at the idle-berthing jetties for plug-in service so that the vessels can draw
power from main electricity supply while idle-berthing in order to save their
battery power. Three-phase electric power supply is required for ice plants,
refrigeration equipment etc. In addition, electric power is required for street
lighting, illuminating vehicle parking areas, fish auction hall and other individual
buildings etc.
Provision is made for the electric power supply, general lighting and 11 KVA
electric substation within the fishery harbour complex. The location for installation
of electrical substation and transformer is shown in the fishery harbour layout
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03near the entrance gate and security house in the fishery
harbour. High mast lights would be installed near quays/jetties, traffic junctions
and important places. To tide over emergency situation like general electric power
shut downs/breakdowns, the important buildings like fish handling and auction
hall, ice plant, fishery administrative office and freshwater and seawater pumping
stations would be supplied with power by standby diesel gen-sets.
6.8.25 Ice plant and chilled storage
It is the present practice of the trawlers performing2, 6 and 8 days fishing trip to
carry at least 150 kg, 2 tons,3 tons and 5 tonne of ice per trip respectively. At this
rate, the fishing boats would need about 180 tons of ice per day. The demand for
ice could further increase if the fish catch improves after the construction of
fishery harbour. As such, in the proposed fishery harbour provision is made for
construction of two ice plants one cold storage close to the outfitting quay and fish
auction hall as shown in harbour layout Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. The details of Ice
plant and cold storages are shown inDrg.No.AP- JUVL /23.
6.8.26 Civic amenity sites
Fishermen require essentials such as fish nets, baskets, sinkers, buoys, anchors,
Page 109
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
ropes, automobile/machinery parts/products etc., for their fishing vessels and gear.
The fishermen also need to carry food provisions before going on a fishing trip.
Therefore, marine supply and provision stores are required to be set up in the
fishery harbour complex. It is also necessary for the mechanised fishing vessels to
possess onboard electronic equipment such as fish finder, echo sounder, walkietalkies, radio, electronic position finder etc.
Apart from the above services, the proposed fishery harbour needs civic amenities
such as food courts/outlets, tea/coffee and soft drink dispensers, post and telegraph
facilities including telephone, fax and e-mail and internet cafes, medical stores and
health services, financial institutions such as banks preferably with automated
teller machines (ATMs), institutions extending credit/insurance services etc. Since
large number of people congregate in a fishery harbour during peak fishing season,
a police outpost may be required to maintain law and order and to thwart any
untoward incidents effectively.
To meet the above demands, the proposed fishery harbour provides for civic
amenity site of 5210 sqm area in public utility module for setting up the above
mentioned services within the fishery harbour complex as shown in harbour layout
Drg.No.AP- JUVL /03. The provision made is only for the land as the investment
for actual civic amenity facilities/shops is expected to come up from the user
groups like private entrepreneurs, governmental and non-governmental agencies.
In addition to vendor shops, the civic amenity site would have open spaces for
greeneries, vehicle parking area etc.
6.8.27 Fire extinguishers
In case of outbreak of fire at any location within the harbour complex by any
reason it is necessary to extinguish the fire at the instant without waiting for fire
brigade. For this reason fire extinguishers are necessary to be installed at important
locations. They should be clearly visible to the public and easily accessible. A list
of fire extinguishers containing information like type of extinguisher, the type of
fire for which it is suitable, brief method of operation, their location in the harbour
complex, date of renewal, etc. could be displayed at the entrance and at places
where extinguishers are placed. Bucket filled with sand may be employed at some
places. Similarly fire hydrants should be clearly marked for easy access and
located at main junctions.
6.8.28 Greenery and Landscaping
Greeneries cultivated inside the fishery harbour complex act as a lung space within
the periphery of the harbour complex and the presence of green foliage would
purify the air, increase the oxygen level and refresh the atmosphere. Greenery also
enhance the aesthetics and beauty of the surrounding environment.For this purpose
the proposed fishery harbour provides an open land spaces of 11,100 sqm area in
the harbour complex for landscaping. This will help to a great extent in
maintaining pollution levels well within the permissible limits of environmental
Page 110
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
norms. Entrance to the fishery harbour complex near the main gate will also be
given suitable facelift and landscaping to welcome the visitors to a well
maintained and cleaner fishery harbour.
Page 111
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
CHAPTER 7
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
7.1
Unit Rates
The need for developing a fishery harbour at Juvvaladinne site with the required
waterside and landside facilities keeping in mind the existing site conditions and
fishery related activities has been explained in the preceding chapters supported by
required project drawings, calculations and description of the facilities.
The abstract cost estimate of the fishery harbour project delineating the various
watersideand landside facilities may be seen at para 7-2. Against each of the
harbour components,the unit quantities and costs are indicated in the abstract cost
estimate based on the lineestimates worked out for these items, wherever possible.
The waterside facilities provided in the abstract cost estimate include northern and
southern rubble mound training walls, quay structures like fish landing, outfitting,
idle berthing and repair quays, dredging of harbour basin area, sloping hard and
navigational aids.
The landside facilities provided include land reclamation with dredged material
and borrowed earth, fish handling and auction hall including fish loading and
vehicle parking areas for MFVs, Tuna and FRPs; seawater pumping and
distribution system for cleaning of fish auction hall and fish boxes, fishery
administrative office, fishermen gear sheds, sheltered net mending sheds and net
drying areas, boat repair shop, boat parking/repair yard, boat building yards,
restaurant for fishermen and harbor users, fishermen rest shed, ice plant, coastal
police station, community hall, commercial complex, dormitory, guest house,
public toilet blocks, internal fresh water storage, supply and distribution system,
drainage and sewage system including septic tanks, soak pits, roadside dust bins,
storm water drains including wastewater treatment system, electric power and
lighting, security/ guard house including main gate and compound wall to
delineate the fishery harbour complex area and to secure the harbour complex
from intruders, radio-communication tower etc.,
Provision made for the drainage and sewerage including the wastewater treatment
system in the fishery harbour complex and for some other items is on lump sum
basis and actual details would be worked out at the time of project implementation.
The State Government is expected to provide the minimum basic facilities like
fresh water and electric power supply from the nearest available sources to the
fishery harbour complex and bear the costs on the same from State funds. The land
area contained within the proposed fishery harbour complex is said to be
belonging to State Govt.
Page 112
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
The quays and other shore structures in the fishery harbour complex hasbeen
planned, designed on the basis of subsoil and field data. A lump sum provision has
been made for Consultancy charges for preparation of Detailed Project Report
including Subsoil investigations, field data collection, model studies and
Environmental impact assessment studies.
In addition to the above, the proposed fishery harbour complex provides for
putting up greenery and landscaping in open spaces at various locations
throughout the complex area to improve aesthetics and beautify the fishery
harbour complex area.
Provision is to be made for the cost of environmental monitoring plan and
mitigation measures. while constructing the fishery harbour from the viewpoint of
environmental protection. Further, the abstract cost estimate of the project would
include the contingencies and work charged establishment charges at the rate of
3% and 2% of the project cost respectively.
7.2
Abstract Cost Estimate
The total cost of construction of harbour facilities works out to Rs 242.22
crores.The unit rates furnished for the items are based on the Andhra Pradesh
schedule of rates for Building, Irrigation and Public Health Engineering for the
year 2016-17, which are applicable for the current financial year also. While
computing the cost of different construction material like stone, sand, cement,
bricks, borrowed earth etc., final rates have been arrived taking into account the
basic rate at the quarry site and the other factors like additional lead, lift, loading
and unloading charges, taxes, duties etc., Theabstract cost estimate is given below.
Page 113
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
Annexure I
Sl.
Description
Unit
No.
1 Training Wall/Breakwaters
i) Northern Training Wall
Rm
ii) Southern Training Wall
Rm
2 Dredging and Disposal
Cum
3 Reclamation and levelling
i) Reclamation with dredged material upto Cum
+2.00m
ii) Reclamation with borrowed earth
Cum
(good earth or gravel) +2.0m to +2.5m
4 Quays (Diaphragm Wall) for MFVs
Rm
5 Revetment
Sqm
6 Traffic areas and surfacing
a) Approach road with embankment
Sqm
b) Asphalt roads within the harbour
complex
i) Double lane
Sqm
ii) Single lane
Sqm
c) WBM surface
Sqm
i) Vehicle parking area behind the fish
Sqm
auction hall
d) Concrete surface-Fish loading area
Sqm
7 Fish Handling and Auction Hall for MFVs Sqm
8 Fish Handling and Auction Hall FRP
Sqm
boats
9 Tuna Fish Handling and Packing Hall
Sqm
10 Fishery Administrative Office
Sqm
11 Fishermen gear sheds ( 9Nos.x161.3
Sqm
Sqm)
12 Net mending sheds ( 4Nos.x206.95
Sqm
Sqm)
13 Fishermen rest sheds (3Nos.x213.40
Sqm
Sqm)
14 Boat repair shop ( 2 Nos.x95.34 Sqm)
Sqm
15 Restaurant
Sqm
16 Dormitory
Sqm
17 RC sloping hard
Sqm
18 Security/guard House
Sqm
19 Compound wall
Rm
20 Radio Communication Tower
Sqm
21 Public Toilet (3Nos.x67.73)
Sqm
Quantity
Rate
(Rs.)
Amount
(Rs.)
835
615
624390
495449.10
657886.18
300.00
41,37,00,000
40,46,00,000
18,73,20,000
468200
158.01
7,39,80,000
117100
380.87
4,46,00,000
909
18650
389240.92
1280.97
35,38,20,000
2,38,90,000
14000.00
2990.00
4,18,60,000
33642
49424
52383
8749
2317.94
1804.37
836.34
1879.07
7,79,80,000
8,91,80,000
4,38,10,000
1,64,40,000
1229
779
360
2277.44
23044.00
23002.22
28,00,000
1,79,58,200
82,90,000
1119
163
1451.70
42734.89
26082.42
19714.82
4,78,40,000
42,40,000
2,86,20,000
827.80
9374.24
77,60,000
640.20
28537.96
1,82,70,000
190.68
127.70
265.77
1950
27.2
1420
199.8
203.19
17516.26
25763.51
20769.84
5461.54
33406.75
4605.63
25923.33
36025.39
33,40,000
32,90,000
55,20,000
1,06,50,000
9,10,000
65,40,000
51,80,000
73,20,000
Page 114
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT - JUVVALADINNE FISHERY HARBOUR
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Coastal Police Station
Commercial Complex
Community Hall
Guest House
Ice Plant (2 Nos.x381.34 Sqm)
Fish Drying Yard
Beach landing area
Precast kerb for beach landing area
Navigational and radio-communication
equipment
Electric power supply and distribution
including electric substation and general
lighting
Fresh water storage, supply and
distribution with ground water sumps,
pump house and overhead tank
Seawater supply and distribution with
shallow water tube well, pump house and
overhead tank
Drainage and sewerage including effluent
treatment plant, storm water drains and
cross drainage works
Water purification (RO) Plant
Greeneries and landscaping in front of
main gate and at other places
Fire extinguishers, fire hydrants and other
equipment
Consultancy charges for preparation of
Detailed Project Report including Subsoil
investigations, field data collection, model
studies and Environmental impact
assessment studies
Environmental mitigation measures and
monitoring
Sqm
Sqm
Sqm
Sqm
Sqm
Sqm
Sqm
Rm
121.60
809.70
746.40
783.00
762.68
1649.84
8800.00
215.00
LS
35,00,000
1,70,00,000
1,45,00,000
1,61,40,000
1,75,60,000
1,35,00,000
19,00,000
20,66,000
5,00,000
As per detail
estimate
1,14,00,000
As per detail
estimate
99,30,000
As per detail
estimate
15,00,000
As per detail
estimate
3,00,00,000
LS
LS
5,00,000
30,00,000
LS
10,00,000
LS
10,00,00,000
LS
20,00,000
Sub Total
Add 5% for cost escalation
Sub Total
Add 3 % for Contingencies
Add 2 % for Work charged establishment
charges
28782.89
20995.43
19426.58
20613.03
23024.07
8182.61
215.91
9609.30
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
219,57,04,200
10,97,85,210
230,54,89,410
6,91,64,682
4,74,93,082
Total Rs. 242,21,47,174
Say 242.22 Crores
Page 115