Escaping Debt Slavery: Ethiopia, Africa, and the IMF
blackagendareport.com/escaping-debt-slavery-ethiopia-africa-and-imf
Escaping Debt Slavery: Ethiopia, Africa, and the IMF
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
17 May 2023
In 1987, at the Organization for African Unity, Thomas Sankara said, "Debt is a cleverly
managed reconquest of Africa." Ethiopia might actually be better off if the US keeps the
IMF from signing off on its latest loan request.
The US is holding up Ethiopia's request for a $2 billion loan from the International
Monetary Fund (IMF) for postwar reconstruction and development. I spoke to Robert J.
Prince, Retired Senior Lecturer at the University of Denver’s Josef Korbel School of
International Studies , about Ethiopia, Africa, and the IMF.
ANN GARRISON: A source who preferred to remain anonymous told me that the US is
holding Ethiopia’s loan up, demanding accountability for wartime atrocities, but that their
real goal is to force Ethiopia to distance itself from Russia and China, but most of all
from Eritrea. That sounds plausible, but what do you think?
ROBERT J. PRINCE: I'm not at all surprised that the loan request is in limbo, as
Washington has been putting all kinds of pressure on Ethiopia for some time. And this is
just another form of pressure. Indeed, putting all the pieces together, Washington has
been engaged in nothing short of hybrid warfare against Ethiopia ever since Abiy Ahmed
came to power in 2018. The games being played with the IMF loan are simply one
element of that.
1/11
Concerning Washington's claims of Ethiopian government atrocities, Washington is well
aware that the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) tried to regain power militarily
and failed. The TPLF has essentially been Washington's proxy in the region.
This was a two-year war, and in war, unfortunately, atrocities are committed, but most of
the documentation that I have seen places the atrocities on the TPLF side of the fence,
and they have been, quite frankly, horrific.
Having failed to overthrow the Abiy government and bring the TPLF to power, the United
States tried to control the outcome diplomatically, through the Pretoria peace agreement,
which Washington orchestrated from the sidelines to save the TPLF from complete
defeat. The pressure that is being put on them through this IMF agreement is an
example of that.
Let's just look for a moment at the comment about Eritrea. In my mind, there's no doubt
that one of the main targets of Washington in the Horn of Africa is the Eritrean
government. We need to keep a couple of things in mind, given the wall of bad press
that Eritrea gets in this country. One is that Eritrea is the only country in Africa that has
refused to collaborate with AFRICOM, the US Africa Command.
And the other thing, less known and less appreciated, is that Eritrea also refuses to
accept IMF and World Bank loans with their structural adjustment aspects. I don't think
there's any other country in Africa that has done that either. So these are really the main
reasons for Washington’s hostility towards Eritrea.
But you have to add something else. To back up a little bit, I was recently reading a book
about Ethiopia called The Lion of Judah in the New World . The author is Theodore
Vestal, an Oklahoma State University professor. And in that book, he makes a comment
about Henry Kissinger's policy towards the Horn of Africa. We're talking 1972-1973, but
it really sets the stage very nicely. And what Vestal notes is that in some National
Security Council secret document, Kissinger said that the best thing for Washington's
policy in the Horn of Africa was to keep the region divided and pit one side against
another.
Think about what's happening now, the carving up of Sudan over 10 years ago, the
splitting up of Somalia that you're reporting on these days, and then the ethnic conflicts
that continue to hurt Ethiopia. That is classic Kissinger divide-and-rule kind of stuff.
And the opposite of that is Ethiopia, trying to make regional alliances, both for economic
and political reasons. And from what I can tell, the strength, the real key to economic
and social dynamism and development in the Horn of Africa is the Eritrean-Ethiopian
connection. So of course that's something that Washington wants to break up. It’s
another reason Eritrea gets all the bad press it gets.
It's very difficult for me to analyze what's fact and what's fiction in US reporting on
Eritrea. I don't follow much of it because I feel it's so one-sided.
2/11
AG: Okay, the same source, who prefers to remain anonymous, said that China is
Ethiopia's largest bilateral creditor. So therefore, the US thinks that China should take on
more responsibility in terms of the bailout package. However, the Chinese want the IMF
to foot the bill. Could you interpret?
RJP: We need to remember certain things about the IMF and the World Bank. While
they claim to be international organizations, and of course to a certain extent they are,
they are US run and dominated. And since the late 1970s, early 1980s, the IMF has
attached conditions to its loans. And those conditions are known as structural
adjustment, which has been discredited by academics all over the world for the past 35
or 40 years. It doesn't lead to development, but it does lead to greater debt.
So how would this particular proposal be any different from other IMF proposals? I don't
know.
But in terms of the broader geopolitical question, let's just be frank about what's
happening in the Horn of Africa. And here I would like to take a specific example that
relates to foreign aid and major funding. And that has been the West’s attitude towards
the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), which has the potential of really
creating a kind of economic dynamism in the Horn of Africa which hasn't existed until
now.
Ethiopia went on several occasions to the IMF and the World Bank asking for financial
aid to help build the dam, but they didn't get it. And, in fact, most of the funding for that
dam has come from the Ethiopian people themselves, which is quite moving. So this is
their dam. And this is their dam, whether they’re Amhara, Oromo, Tigrayan, Somali, or
any other Ethiopian ethnicity. It doesn't matter. It’s their dam.
The creation of this dam is one of the few counterbalancing forces that I see to all this
ethnic tension and dissent. Everyone has a place in that dam. And not just Ethiopia,
because this dam, when completed, and it's near completion, is going to provide
electricity for the entire region. And without electricity, development is difficult, difficult to
impossible.
Now, where do the Chinese fit into this? The Chinese are the only major foreign country
to my knowledge that have played any role in funding this dam.
AG: I believe they invested in the electricity delivery infrastructure.
RJP: That may be. I haven't seen the statistics for a couple of years, but as I remember,
Ethiopians had invested about $6 billion and the Chinese had invested about $1 billion.
So you've got that big project. And in the midst of all this ethnic tension that we're
seeing, the dam brings Ethiopians together and brings the Horn together, but what has
the US and the World Bank position been on the dam? They've opposed it, they've
3/11
opposed it down the line. They've thrown monkey wrenches into it. This is the kind of
project that the IMF and the United States refuse to fund. But this is the kind of project
that the Chinese in particular welcome and help. So there's that part of it.
When I look at this Chinese, Russian, and American competition for Ethiopia, and for
Africa in general, what we're really seeing is the reemergence of the politics and division
of the Non-Aligned Movement of the 1950s. If you really get down to it, very few
countries want to take sides in this New Cold War.
They want to be able to deal with both China and the United States, but this is
unacceptable to the US. This whole thing is being played out worldwide. It's being
played out in Africa, and the people of Africa are making it really clear that they don’t
want to take sides, and that both sides have a possibility to engage in their development.
How could US policy towards Ethiopia change to make it more constructive? I don't see
that happening, by the way, but if it did, they would invest in infrastructure. All this
US/AFRICOM military buildup that we're seeing in the region is only causing more
conflict.
If the US wants to compete with the Chinese in developing Africa, that can be done. The
United States still has tremendous resources and has the ability to do it. Then ask the
Ethiopians what kind of aid and investment they want. Ask Africans. That kind of
competition would be a win-win situation for everyone. There's no need for it to be
anything else, but I don't see our government moving in that direction at all.
AG: No, they don't fund development. They fund aid, which creates dependency.
RPJ: Yes.
AG: For those not so familiar with the IMF, could you explain what structural adjustment
means, what the IMF demands in exchange for these loans and bailouts?
RJP: Good question. Structural adjustment means laying down conditions that countries
must accept in order to get the money that they need, often that they're starving for. That
means that they’re forced to open up their economies to foreign intervention, whether it's
investment or markets. And for a country that's trying to develop economically—it really
doesn't matter whether it's on a capitalist or socialist model—some kind of protectionism
is almost required in the initial stages of development, for a certain amount of time.
Structural adjustment eliminates the possibility of a young, emerging economy
developing to the point where it can compete globally. One part of it is allowing goods to
be imported into the country at prices that local manufacturers can’t compete with.
Economies still recovering from colonialism are weak. So they need some form of
protectionism. and some form of government support for their economic development.
Structural adjustment severely limits the role of a government in helping a country stand
up. That's really the heart of the matter.
4/11
Conditions include cutting government support for education, health care, transportation
and other forms of infrastructural development. Then these areas are taken over by
foreign players. As that happens, it's inevitable that these countries can't compete, their
debt grows larger and larger, and therefore they have to come back to the IMF or the
World Bank for further aid. And they get caught in a debt cycle. So this is the problem of
structural adjustment.
AG: Don't they typically wind up using the money they borrowed to pay interest on the
debt, giving it right back to the people who loaned it to them?
RJP: Yes they do! Addis is applying for an IMF loan for debt relief, to service its
increasingly heavy interest payments. Ethiopia’s debt distress level is rated as high and
that’s probably one of the key factors behind this loan application. Between 1970 and
2006, Ethiopia’s debt levels were somewhere between $1 and 10 billion. Since 2006
those debt levels have risen precipitately. Just since 2020, when the TPLF’s failed
attempt at a military coup began, Ethiopia’s debt ballooned from $34 to 60.1 billion, a
near doubling over three years. This is an increasingly unmanageable burden for
Ethiopia to bear, cutting into development possibilities not just for Ethiopia but for the
entire Horn of Africa.
Virtually all Horn of Africa countries are near “debt distress.” Sudan and Somalia are
already in debt distress, meaning they cannot in any way pay off the loans they have
acquired from multinational entities like the IMF and World Bank, or from private
sources. Twenty-two African countries are now either bankrupt or at high risk of debt
distress.
African debt remains at its highest level in over a decade. Debt servicing sucks up
increasingly large proportions of budgets and revenues. As a result, a wave of defaults
in the world’s most vulnerable countries is likely to occur and faster than expected.
The other thing that happens is there's so much corruption that gets involved, given all
the African despots we support, that a lot of this money just disappears.
So they've set up a system that's very hard to get out of. It’s an endless cycle of growing
poverty and social problems and greater economic interference from larger countries,
but particularly from Washington and the Europeans.
I first looked at this policy 30-plus years ago, after serving in the Peace Corps. And then
I couldn't believe it could last this long because it's so punitive. But now it's finally
coming apart. We're seeing countries that don't want to be dominated by the dollar
anymore and will trade with China in yen. These are attempts to get off of exactly these
kinds of policies.
And who is looking at IMF policies and saying we've had it? Well, virtually the entire
Global South.
5/11
One last point on these policies. It's much easier to impose them on poor countries.
When the United States or the World Bank or IMF tried to do that with China and Russia,
and even Iran, as they did, they did not succeed. So it's been middle and larger
economies that have danced with the IMF for a certain amount of time, until they
realized this is not in their interest and pulled back.
AG: It sounds like it could be better if they don’t get this $2 billion loan in the long run.
What do you think might be the consequence if they don’t? Calling it a bailout makes it
seem dire.
RJP: Whether Ethiopia gets the loan or doesn’t there will be pressure either way. One of
those “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” situations for sure.
If they don’t get the loan – given the level of domestic turmoil the country is experiencing
- their financial situation will be that much more difficult, forcing them to look for other
creditors.
But it is not at all clear – given that the conditions the IMF is asking are not public – that
even getting the loan could be problematic. For example,
One of the conditions for the loan to be processed is that Ethiopia give the IMF creditors
and development partners guarantees for the $2 billion, which will be difficult for Ethiopia
to come up with and add considerable pressure on Ethiopian finances should they be
unable to pay on time. Nor is there any assurance that even if such conditions were met,
that the loan would be granted.
So pressure both ways: if they get it, depending on the conditions, and if they don’t get
it, given the financial problems. All this needs to be placed in the broader context of
Washington’s hybrid warfare against the Abiy government.
If you just look at the Tigray War, and now all these terrible massacres taking place in
the Oromia Region and elsewhere, it seems like the country's falling apart. But when you
look at the economic indicators, you see that it's not in spite of all of this. The Ethiopian
economy is growing, and regional integration is taking place. This region is tired of war,
of factionalism, of the kind of sectarian policies that have dragged it down for so long.
All these countries want to find common ground. And so is that approach going to win
out? I believe that it will in the end, but not without a lot of pain and struggle in the years
ahead.
AG: Okay, thank you, Rob Prince for speaking to Black Agenda Report.
RJP: My pleasure.
Ann Garrison is a Black Agenda Report Contributing Editor based in the San
Francisco Bay Area. In 2014, she received the Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza
Democracy and Peace Prize for her reporting on conflict in the African Great
6/11
Lakes region. She can be reached at ann(at)anngarrison.com.
Robert J. Prince is a retired Senior Lecturer at the University of Denver's Josef
Korbel School of International Studies and a political commentator at Pacifica
affiliate KGNU-Boulder, Colorado.
IMF
Ethiopia
GERD
Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles. Please click on the DONATE
icon, and help us out, if you can.
Related Stories
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
US Shoots Itself in the Foot in Africa
08 March 2023
In Africa as in the rest of the world, US machinations undermine its goals and bring other
nations together as they seek to protect themselves
7/11
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
Ethiopia: The Tigray Famine Narrative Was a Total Fabrication
15 February 2023
The narrative of famine in the Tigray region of Ethiopia was repeated uncritically by the
media and was amplified by people who were on board w
The National Council of Eritrean-Americans NCEA
Targeting Eritrea and Ethiopia: The Warmongering Campaign of Disinformation
25 January 2023
Washington think tanks are home to the propagandists who help guide US foreign policy
decisions. The National Council of Eritrean Americans hig
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
Ethiopia Nears Victory in its Civil War, US Scrambles to Control the Outcome
26 October 2022
War between Ethiopia and the TPLF may be coming to an end, but the US is using
sanctions to have the final word despite the apparent defeat of
8/11
Dr. Fikrejesus Amahazion
An Inversion of Truth: the TPLF and its Commitment to Peace
26 October 2022
The conflict between the Ethiopian government and the TPLF has been marked by a well
coordinated disinformation campaign.
Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor , John Philpot
Sanctioning the Horn of Africa
07 October 2022
Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Somalia have suffered from a variety of U.S. interventions over
many years.
9/11
Black Alliance For Peace
AFRICOM Watch Bulletin #41
28 September 2022
The Black Alliance for Peace AFRICOM Watch Bulletin #41 analyzes how white
supremacy operates through the actions of the International Monetary
More Stories
Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
Second Session of the UN Permanent Forum on People of African Descent
09 Jun 2023
Tunde Osazua is Outreach Coordinator for Black Alliance for Peace and a civil
society representative in the UN Permanent Forum on People of African D
Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
Black Agenda Radio June 9, 2023
09 Jun 2023
In this week’s segment we will hear about the Stop Cop City movement in Atlanta
that challenges that city’s political leadership to end their plans for a militarized
police facility, and in New Yor
10/11
Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
Atlanta's Black Community Says, "Stop Cop City!"
09 Jun 2023
Rev. Keyanna Jones is an Atlanta based minister and an organizer with Community
Movement Builders.
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
NYPD Illegal Searches Target Communities of Color
09 Jun 2023
Samah Sisay is a staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
State Repression Targets the Stop Cop City Movement
07 Jun 2023
Cop City is an effort to ensure that state violence will bring the most draconian
methods to bear against Black people. State violence is also being used proactively,
in an effort to end opposition…
Load More
11/11