DOLO Sarah, a teenager, enters a local supermarket with the intention of stealing several items. She carries a large purse to hide the stolen goods. Sarah selects various items from the shelves, including snacks, cosmetics, and a small electronic device. She then proceeds to an aisle with minimal surveillance and discreetly places these items into her purse. Theft is committed when Sarah intentionally takes items belonging to the store without paying for them. Sarah's actions show clear intent to steal the items, as she conceals them in her purse and bypasses the checkout. John, a financially struggling individual, is facing mounting debts and needs quick cash to pay his bills. He decides to engage in check forgery as a way to obtain the money he needs. John is arrested and charged with forgery, a criminal offense. His intent to deceive and defraud is evident, as he knowingly created and attempted to deposit a forged check. If convicted, John may face penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the jurisdiction's laws. John goes to the bank where Sarah Smith has her account and attempts to deposit the forged check into his own account. Samantha is a well-known food critic who writes for a popular lifestyle magazine. She decides to write a scathing review of a local restaurant called "Delightful Eats." In her review, Samantha makes several false claims about the restaurant, stating that they have a history of health code violations, have been responsible for food poisoning incidents, and use subpar ingredients in their dishes. She also suggests that the restaurant's owner, Mr.Paul, has been involved in criminal activities related to his business. Samantha has made false statements about "Delightful Eats," alleging health code violations, food poisoning incidents, and criminal activity without any factual basis. The false claims could harm the restaurant's reputation and potentially lead to a loss of business. Two neighbors named John and Mark had a protracted dispute over property lines and noise complaints on a quiet suburban neighborhood. Months of growing tension between them culminate in a tragic evening when it finally snaps. John is known for playing loud music late into the night, disturbing Mark's sleep and peace. The legal system may consider the ongoing feud between the two neighbors as a mitigating factor in determining the appropriate charges and penalties. Sarah and Mark have been married for several years. Initially, their relationship seemed loving, but over time, Mark's behavior has become increasingly controlling and abusive. The legal system takes action against Mark, and he is ordered to attend anger management and domestic violence counseling. With the support of the domestic violence shelter, Sarah decides to press charges against Mark for his abusive actions. CULPA During rush hour, John is operating his car down a busy downtown street. He's stressed out and running late for a crucial meeting. As John approaches the crossroads, he is preoccupied with a phone call and misses the pedestrian crossing the street in front of him. Maria, on the other hand, is doing so with the right of way and in a marked crosswalk. Additionally, he disregards Maria's right of way as she crosses the street. Maria gets injured when John's carelessness causes a collision and Maria is hit by his automobile. Maria files a personal injury claim with John's insurance company to seek compensation for her medical expenses, pain, and suffering. The insurance company, acknowledging John's culpability, agrees to cover Maria's medical bills and additional damages as part of their liability coverage. Sarah is shopping at a local grocery store one rainy afternoon. As she walks down one of the store's aisles, she suddenly slips and falls on a wet patch on the floor. Sarah sustains injuries, including a fractured wrist and sprained ankle, as a result of the fall. Sarah suffers a hip injury as a result of the fall and decides to file a personal injury claim against the grocery store. They offer a settlement to Sarah, which covers her medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Amy and XYZ Company entered into a contract for the delivery of custom-made furniture. The contract stipulated that XYZ Company would deliver the furniture to Amy's home within six weeks of the order placement and that the furniture should meet certain specifications outlined in the contract. Six weeks pass, and Amy still has not received her furniture. She contacts XYZ Company multiple times to inquire about the delay, but they provide no satisfactory response This legal remedy is a consequence of XYZ Company's culpa in failing to fulfill their contractual obligations. As a result of the judge's ruling, XYZ Company is ordered to compensate Amy for the cost of the furniture, any additional expenses incurred due to the delay, and any other damages suffered as a result of the breach of contract. Emily seeks medical treatment for a persistent health issue and consults with Dr. Smith, a specialist at a reputable hospital. After a series of examinations, Dr. Smith diagnoses her condition and recommends a specific surgical procedure to address it. During the surgical procedure, Dr. Smith makes a critical mistake, resulting in an unintended injury to Emily. This error was due to Dr. Smith's failure to follow the established medical guidelines and procedures The case goes to court, and expert witnesses testify about the medical errors committed during Emily's surgery. The judge and jury find Dr. Smith and the hospital liable for medical malpractice due to their culpa in providing substandard care. Emily waits all day for her mother to recognise and wish her a happy birthday. Sarah realizes her error when she finally gets home in the evening and sees the decorations. Emily seemed to be hurt and upset. Sarah regrets greatly having forgotten her daughter's significant birthday. Emily is hurt and disappointed by her mother's forgetfulness, which intensifies Sarah's feelings of guilt. Sarah neglected her responsibility as a mother to remember and celebrate her daughter's birthday. John realized he had forgotten to secure a venue and had not reached out to potential donors for contributions. When he arrived at the supposed venue, he saw another event taking place, and he felt a deep sense of culpa (guilt and responsibility) for letting down the animal shelter and his colleagues who had trusted him with this important task. He knew he had failed to fulfill his obligations, and he needed to find a way to make amends quickly. It's worth noting that is not a commonly used term in everyday English, and the more common word for guilt or responsibility is simply "guilt" or "responsibility." John feelings of guilt and responsibility for failing to meet his commitments.