Introduction to Management Professor Ming Sun School of the Built Environment Heriot-Watt University WHAT IS MANAGEMENT? Definitions of Management "Management is an art of knowing what is to be done and seeing that it is done in the best possible manner." (F.W. Taylor) "Management is to forecast and plan, to organize, to command, to coordinate, and to control." (Henri Fayol) “Management is defined as the process by which a co-operative group directs action towards common goals” (Joseph Massie) More Definitions "Management is the coordination of all resources through the process of planning, organising, directing and controlling in order to attain stated goals." (Henry Sisk) "Management is a process of working with and through others to achieve organizational objectives in a changing environment, central to this purpose is the effective and efficient use of limited resources." (Rovert Kreitner) Essential Elements of Management Goals Process Resources Discuss the relationship between these elements PROCESS OF MANAGEMENT Management Process Activities Management process: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. Planning Setting objectives and how to achieve them About the future. Different timeframe (long-term, medium-term, short-term). Different levels (strategic, tactical, operational). Uncertainties are inevitable. Plan needs to be reviewed. ABCD Planning Methods A = Awareness and Visioning B = Baseline Mapping C = Creative Solutions D = Decide on Priorities Organising Organising resources to achieve business goals Setting up organisation structure Deciding the flow of tasks Allocating human and capital resources Deciding line of command Leading Influencing people to work towards achieving set objectives Directing staff Communicating with staff Negotiating with staff Motivating staff Controlling Monitoring activities and taking corrective actions if necessary Establishing performance standards or benchmarks Determining methods of measuring performance Measuring actual performance Comparing performance to established standards Taking corrective action when necessary and regularly reviewing performance Different Levels of Management Distribution of Time per Activity by Managers of Different Level Source: Adapted from T. A. Mahoney, T. H. Jerdee, and S. J. Carroll, “The Job(s) of Management,” Industrial Relations 4, No.2 (1965), p.103. EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT THEORY The Pre-modern Era Ancient massive construction projects Egyptian pyramids Great Wall of China Stonehenge in the UK Management was a reality, but not considered as a separate discipline. 1–17 Adam Smith’s Contribution To The Field Of Management Wrote the Wealth of Nations (1776) Advocated the economic advantages that organizations and society would reap from the division of labor: Increased productivity by increasing each worker’s skill and ability. Time saved that is commonly lost in changing tasks. The creation of labor-saving inventions and machinery. Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. The Industrial Revolution’s Influence On Management Practices Industrial revolution Machine power began to substitute for human power Lead to mass production of economical goods Improved and less costly transportation systems became available Created larger markets for goods. Larger organizations developed to serve larger markets Created the need for formalized management practices. Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. Main Management Theories Fryer et al (2004) The practice of construction management Classical Approach to Management Including scientific management and bureaucracy Emphasis on purpose, formal structure, hierarchy of management, technical requirements, and common principles The belief is: There is a best machine for each job, so there is a best working method by which people should undertake their jobs All job processes should be analysed into discrete tasks & via this management find the ‘one best’ way to perform each task Scientific Management (Taylorism or Fordism) Emphasises organisational efficiency to increase organizational success. Analyses each person’s work in a scientific way Scientific selection, training and development of the workers Defines ways of co-operation between workers Clear division of work and responsibility Criticism of Scientific Approach The main criticism of this approach is that each worker only perform a single task, which can be very repetitive and boring. Bureaucracy – the Main Features Specialisation: every employee should perform a single function Hierarchy of authority: Duties and responsibilities of each job and its relationship to other jobs should be clearly defined. System of rules: Operations and processes are defined as rules. Impersonality: Little consideration for people who perform the jobs. Criticisms of Bureaucracy Over-emphasis on rules and procedures Initiatives may be stifled by inflexible rules Leads to typical inefficient bureaucratic behaviour Impersonal relations Criticisms of the classical approach Insufficient account taken of personality factors Creates organisational structures where people can exercise only limited control over their work environment Human Relations Approach to Management The behavioural approach to management is a management approach that emphasises increasing organizational success by focusing on human variables within the organization. Human Relations Approach Is based on the consideration of the social factors at work and the behaviour of employees within an organisation Particular importance is paid to the informal organisation and the satisfaction of individuals’ needs through groups at work Hawthorne experiments acted as a turning point in the development of the Human Relations movement The Hawthorne Experiments Assembly of telephone equipment (late 20’s/early 30’s) Experiments (Industrial psychologists - positivists) to relate illumination with output Picked out a team of girls and placed them in a very well lit separate environment No matter what the brightness, productivity went up or did not fall Subsequent changes of other variables only showed increase in productivity See Mullins and Christy (2010), pp53-55 for a more detailed discussion on the Hawthorne experiments The Hawthorne Effect Illumination experiments did not shed light on relation between illumination and output Girls felt special – they were picked and then observed Teams understood to be important (social dynamics) as well as psychological factors and behaviour (managers and employees) THE HAWTHORNE EFFECT was born! Explanations concerning the relationship between employees, productivity and quality of work were to be found by exploring social relations and dynamics in the workplace Human Relations Approach – the Criticisms The positivists assumptions were exposed, however, by modern standards of social research the human relations approach at the time was viewed to be methodologically questionable. In particular, it failed to take sufficient account of wider environmental factors - context Insufficiently scientific!!! The Hawthorne experiments were, and still are, argued to lack rigor For some, this approach was still overly pro-management and output driven rather than a real emphasis on people and human development – see humanists! The Systems Approach Attempts to reconcile the classical (organisations without people) and human relations approaches (people without organisations) Balances the technical demands of a company alongside the psychological and social needs of its employees Attention is focused on: the total work of the organisation the inter-relationships of structures & behaviour the range of variables within the organisation The organisation is viewed within its total environment and the importance of multiple channels in interaction is emphasised However, draws upon reductionism and thus criticised for being overly scientific and positivist The Contingency Approach Views the structure of an organisation and its success as dependent on: the nature of tasks that are undertaken the nature of environmental influences There is no one best way to structure or manage organisations - it is dependent on the contingencies of the situation Caveats The various approaches represent a progression of ideas and a pattern of complementary studies Not all writers can be neatly categorised Whilst there may be acceptance of the need for a framework there is no agreement on its shape The distinction between certain ‘schools’ of thought are not clear cut Modern Approaches Management thinking is continuously evolving New business practices pose challenges to the established management theories The emphasis for management today is to manage continuous change against the background of a dynamic environment CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT What is Construction Management? =construction project management? =construction site management? =form of project delivery? There is still no consensus! CIOB: Definition of Construction Management Management of the development, conservation and improvement of the built environment; Exercised at a variety of levels from the site and project, through the corporate organisations of the industry and its clients, to society as a whole; Embracing the entire construction value stream from inception to recycling, and focussing upon a commitment to sustainable construction; Incorporating a wide range of specialist services; guided by a system of values demonstrating responsibility to humanity and to the future of our planet; and informed, supported and challenged by an independent academic discipline. CIOB’S Professionalism: an inclusive definition of Construction Management 2010