Uploaded by tinirawan567

Journal Review Task: Dwi Agustin Irawan (211910401002) Faya Nurin Anggraini (221910401100) Perancangan Penelitian B

advertisement
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
NOTE
Every author must fill Copyright Transfer Form that can be
downloaded in here. Upload instruction can read in here.
Decarbonization with Microalgae and Utilization of Microalgae in Biofuel Production: A
Review
Upaya Dekarbonisasi Menggunakan Mikroalga dan Pemanfaatan Mikroalga dalam Pembuatan
Biofuel: Sebuah Ulasan
Dwi Agustin Irawan1*), Faya Nurin Aggraini1)
Jember University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indonesia
*corresponding email: tinirawan567@gmail.com
1)
Received: DD/MM/YY; Revised: DD/MM/YY; Accepted: DD/MM/YY
Abstract
Carbon dioxide (CO2) has become a major focus in global climate change. This article discusses the
potential use of microalgae in decarbonization and biofuel production as a solution to address the CO 2
emission problem. Microalgae have a unique ability to absorb CO2 through photosynthesis, even more
efficiently than terrestrial plants. They can also be used as feedstock for environmentally friendly
biodiesel production. Nonetheless, challenges such as low biomass productivity and production costs
are still a bottleneck. This review identifies also overcoming these challenges by considering the use of
waste resources and improved cultivation techniques. In addition, the article discusses future
opportunities to increase the use of microalgae in decarbonization efforts. With technological innovation
and proper resource management, microalgae have great potential to contribute to reducing CO2 impact
and achieving decarbonization goals.
Keywords: Carbon dioxide, CO2 emissions, decarbonization, microalgae, biofuel
Abstrak
Karbon dioksida (CO2) telah menjadi fokus utama dalam perubahan iklim global. Artikel ini membahas
potensi penggunaan mikroalga dalam dekarbonisasi dan produksi biofuel sebagai solusi untuk
mengatasi masalah emisi CO2. Mikroalga memiliki kemampuan unik dalam menyerap CO2 melalui
fotosintesis, bahkan lebih efisien daripada tanaman terestrial. Mereka juga dapat digunakan sebagai
bahan baku untuk produksi biodiesel yang ramah lingkungan. Meskipun demikian, tantangan seperti
produktivitas biomassa yang rendah dan biaya produksi masih menjadi hambatan.Kajian ini
mengidentifikasi juga mengatasi tantangan-tantangan ini dengan mempertimbangkan penggunaan
sumber daya limbah dan teknik budidaya yang ditingkatkan. Selain itu, artikel ini membahas peluang
di masa depan untuk meningkatkan penggunaan mikroalga dalam upaya dekarbonisasi. Dengan inovasi
teknologi dan manajemen sumber daya yang tepat, mikroalga memiliki potensi besar untuk
berkontribusi dalam mengurangi dampak CO2 dan mencapai tujuan dekarbonisasi.
Kata kunci: Karbon dioksida, emisi CO2, dekarbonisasi, mikroalga, biofuel
1. Introduction
Carbon dioxide is the largest
contributor to affecting climate change,
which is currently the most prominent
global issue [1, 2]. The development of
modern society requires the maximum use
of fossil fuels, but produces harmful
greenhouse gases such as CO2 and CO [3,
4]. Greenhouse gases such as sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen dioxide, and carbon dioxide are the
main causes of global climate change
contributed by several countries, namely
China, the United States and the United
Kingdom [5, 6]. The long-term impact of
greenhouse gas accumulation will cause
huge economic losses and pose a global
threat to food security and nutrition [7].
High electricity consumption is also a
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 1
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
contributor to higher carbon emissions [8].
Carbon emissions were 36.3 giga tons (Gt)
which increased by 6% in 2020 and 40.8 Gt
CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) was the total carbon
emissions in 2021 [9]. From 2001 to 2018,
the cumulative carbon emissions of China's
transportation industry increased by 633.46
million tons, of which the capital input
effect was the main factor driving carbon
emissions, accounting for 157.70% of the
total cumulative emissions increase,
followed by the energy structure effect of
10.39% [10–12]. Steel companies make a
large contribution to annual CO2 emissions,
making the industry one of the main
contributors to climate change, with its
annual
carbon
dioxide
emissions
accounting for about 5% of the world's total
emissions [13].
The current impacts of climate change
have created a worldwide consensus on the
need for sustainable development [14]. The
energy industry plays an important role due
to its high contribution to greenhouse gas
(GHG) emissions as part of its high
dependence on fossil fuels, requiring
immediate action to ensure long-term
planning focused on decarbonization [15].
Decarbonization of the energy system is
essential to address climate change [16].
Decarbonization requires rapid and
significant supply-side industrial transitions
on a large scale, both to build new systems
and retire existing ones [17]. Decarbonizing
the global energy supply will be much more
difficult and will take much longer [18].
Several CO2 capture techniques have
been delivered to date, including metalorganic frameworks, carbon nanotubes,
activated carbon, and zeolites, as well as
biological
mitigation
using
photoautotrophic microalgae [19, 20].
Microalgae can be used as a way to capture
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
carbon gas as a step in decarbonization [21,
22]. Microalgae are utilized in carbon
fixation because microalgae can actively
absorb CO2 from flue gas for
photosynthesis
and
microalgae
reproduction [23]. Using light and organic
carbon as energy sources, as well as CO2
and organic carbon as carbon sources can
increase the opportunity for microalgae
cultivation to absorb carbon gas in the air
[24, 25]. There are several challenges faced
in microalgae cultivation given the different
characteristics of various waste streams
such as origin, pretreatment process, and
nutrient content resulting in uncontrollable
variables
in
microalgae
biomass
propagation [26, 27]. In some energyintensive
activities
such
as
the
transportation sector, there is currently no
alternative to fossil fuels. Therefore, finding
efficient renewable energy sources is one of
the issues of concern in today's energy
supply [28, 29].
Fossil energy sources remain a major
necessity in meeting current energy
demands. However, renewable energy such
as biodiesel is gaining attention to reduce
dependence on fossil energy sources that
contribute to increased global carbon
emissions [30, 31]. Microalgae have been
established as a potential feedstock for the
production of biofuels that are renewable
and also environmentally friendly [32].
Microalgae offer promising potential in
bioenergy production and CO2 mitigation.
Advantages of microalgae include high
photosynthetic efficiency and fast growth
rate, ability to utilize wastewater as a
nutrient source, can grow on infertile land,
and can use CO2 from exhaust gases [33,
34].
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 2
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Systematic Search and Selection of
Literature
The method includes a structured and
comprehensive search process for scientific
information
on
the
topics
of
decarbonization using microalgae and
conversion of microalgal biomass to
biofuels. The method includes keyword
identification, database selection, and
literature screening.
2.2 Secondary Data Analysis
The method involves evaluating data
that have been generated by previous
studies, including experiments and other
research in the field of decarbonization
using microalgae and conversion of
microalgal biomass to biofuels, including
data compilation and organization and data
analysis.
2.3 Efficiency and Sustainability Analysis
The method involves evaluating the
extent
to
which
decarbonization
technologies using microalgae and the
utilization of microalgal biomass into
biofuels are efficient and sustainable in
reducing carbon emissions.
2.4 Synthesis
of
Findings
and
Recommendations
The authors summarized the main
findings of the evaluated research and
provided recommendations related to the
development and implementation of
decarbonization
technologies
using
microalgae and biofuel production from
microalgal biomass.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Potential of Microalgae in the
Decarbonization Process
Decarbonization Process
Microalgae
is
one
of
the
biotechnology approaches to mitigate CO2
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
and about 2,000,000 species are beneficial
in CO2 sequestration. CO2 fixation through
photoautotrophic algae culture has the
capacity to reduce atmospheric CO2. To
produce
100
tons
of
biomass,
approximately microalgae fix 183 tons of
CO2
[35,
36].
Microalgae
are
photosynthetic organisms that are beneficial
in CO2 fixation and O2 release to the
environment. Cyanobacterium, which is a
sucrose producer, shows high levels of
biomass production, as well as increased
photosystem activity, carbon fixation [37,
38]. lobal warming caused by carbon
emissions can increase the opportunity for
microalgae to fix CO2 due to their rapid
growth rate [39]. Flue gas from fossil fuel
combustion accounts for more than 7% of
total CO2 emissions in the world, which is
very suitable in cultivating microalgae. The
CO2 biological fixation efficiency is
Synechococcus nidulans with 10% CO2
[40]. With its ability to fix CO2 by utilizing
sunlight as an energy source, microalgae is
an efficient biofactor to produce various
biocomponents and biological products
[41].
3.2 Carbon Emission Reduction with
Microalgae
Direct carbon sequestration is the
most promising way to reduce CO2
emissions due to its ability to capture CO2
directly at the source before it is emitted
into the atmosphere. An important part of
the process is biological carbon
sequestration using chemoorganotrophic
microbes that utilize CO2 as an energy
source.
Microalgae,
with
higher
photosynthetic efficiency than terrestrial
plants and their role in biofuels, are
promising candidates for use as carbon
sinks [42, 43]. Moreover, if conventional
processes can be combined with microalgae
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 3
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
using industrial flue gas under the BECCS
concept, microalgae could become even
more promising by completing the cyclical
process as an efficient CO2 capture agent
and potential feedstock for bioenergy.
Microalgae can provide bioenergy in
gaseous, liquid, and solid-phase forms, also
producing high-value bio-products [33, 44].
Recent developments in the field of
biological biology in the area of carbon
capture through microalgae for its
utilization towards biodiesel generation
highlight the importance of certain key
parameters such as efficient strain selection,
microalgae metabolism, cultivation systems
(open and closed) and biomass production
along with national and international
biodiesel specifications and properties [45,
46]. CO2 capture can be applied to large
sources of point sources [47]. Microalgae
are the most important microorganisms in
aquatic ecosystems for the global carbon
budget, playing an important role in CO2
fixation. Through photosynthesis, several
carbon assimilation pathways are involved
in biotransformation into a wide range of
chemicals as bulk products [48, 49].
3.3 Role of Microalgae in Carbon
Sequestration
The growth rate of algae can be
calculated using the equation:
𝑑𝑋
= 𝜇𝑋 − 𝑘𝑑 𝑋
𝑑𝑡
Equation 1. Algae growth calculation
equation [50].
where X is the biomass concentration, μ is
the specific growth rate and kd is the decay
coefficient.
Some
parameters
that
significantly affect the specific growth rate
of
microalgae
include
nutrient
concentration, light intensity, temperature,
and pH value [50].
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
Microalgae have an advantage in
carbon fixation because microalgae do not
have a vascular system to transport
nutrients, but rather microalgae have
photoautotrophic behavior, which can
utilize dissolved nitrogen (N), phosphorus
(P), and organic carbon (OC) directly [51,
52]. Microalgae can be found almost
anywhere including in freshwater and
seawater, so native microalgae can be used
for cultivation to avoid biosafety issues
[53]. Microalgae can capture CO2 and
convert it into O2 and biomass through
photolysis. Microalgae CO2 fixation and
biomass production are highly dependent
on the environmental conditions of
cultivation. Factors that can influence
include
microalgae
species,
CO2
concentration, toxic compounds present in
flue gas, luminosity, and inoculum
concentration [54, 55].
3.4 Utilization of Microalgae in Biofuel
Production
Microalgae biomass generation and
processing options that play an important
role in the establishment of a viable
biodiesel production plant viable biodiesel
production plant will be investigated in
detail [56, 57]. There are three most
common methods used for microalgae mass
production:
open
ponds,
closed
photobioreactors, and hybrid systems.
There are some popular techniques to
harvest microalgae are flocculation,
centrifugation, filtration, ultrafiltration, air
flotation,
automated
flotation,
and
electrophoresis [58, 59].
Heterogeneous catalysis has been
considered as the main choice for biodiesel
knowledge in the near future. Currently,
heterogeneous catalysts have been used for
biodiesel production from non-edible oils
and received global interest due to their
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 4
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
outstanding performance [60, 61]. In some
cases, when biofuel production biofuel
production is scaled up. Microalgae
perform photosynthesis like plants,
converting captured solar energy into
chemical energy through CO2 fixation [62,
63]. During the growth of microalgae in
wastewater, microalgae produce biomass
containing lipids, carbohydrates, and other
compounds that can be used for biofuel
production. In addition, the treated water
can be used in agriculture for irrigation [64].
3.5 Challenges in Utilizing Microalgae for
Decarbonization
and
Biofuel
Production
Some of the challenges include low
biomass productivity, harvesting of algal
biomass, high energy consumption, and
high production costs [65]. Harvesting
microalgae is an energy-intensive process
and leads to increased production costs. To
overcome this major challenge, flue gas and
wastewater have been used for microalgae
cultivation, which reduces the cost of
nutrients and carbon sources, but the
operational cost is high [64]. However,
commercial production of microalgal
biofuels is still a major obstacle due to the
high cost of microalgae cultivation and
biomass harvesting [66]. nother challenge is
that available systems still produce low
yields and efficiencies [67]. The
photosynthesis process of microalgae can
be hampered if the wastewater used in
nutrient delivery is colored and increases
the chance of organic matter contamination
in the wastewater [56].
3.6 Future Opportunities for Microalgae
Use in Decarbonization Efforts
In order to achieve full electrification
of the end-user sector, improvements and
new solutions for the power grid are
required. In general, two approaches at
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
different scales can be identified, namely,
microgrids and large interconnections.
Microgrids are distinct, locally controlled,
wired miniaturized energy systems that
operate in parallel with or isolated from the
main power grid to ensure reliable,
affordable and secure energy [36]. Among
the various technologies evolving to
harness solar energy, concentrated solar
power systems use lenses or mirrors and
tracking systems to focus large areas of
sunlight into small, concentrated beams.
This technology mainly consists of
parabolic troughs and concentrating Fresnel
linear reflectors, parabolas, solar power
towers, double-reflecting solar furnaces,
and solar simulators [38]. Development,
and the low-carbon transition reveal the
interrelationship between decarbonization,
LCD, and LCT which can be used
interchangeably in the literature to describe
the process towards zero-zero carbon
emissions [39]. Raising awareness of the
key role of geoscience in achieving
decarbonization and engaging communities
with field-scale projects field-scale projects
for various subsurface technologies,
including CCS and geothermal heating
schemes [68].
4. Conclusion
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a major
contributor to global climate change.
Greenhouse gas emissions from human
activities, especially the use of fossil fuels,
exacerbate this problem. The energy
industry is one of the major contributors to
CO2 emissions. Therefore, decarbonization
of the energy system is crucial to address
climate change.
Microalgae have great potential in
decarbonization. They can absorb CO2
effectively through photosynthesis, even
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 5
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
more efficiently than terrestrial plants.
Utilizing microalgae in biofuel production
is also a promising solution to reduce
dependence on fossil energy sources.
However, there are a number of
challenges that need to be overcome.
Microalgae biomass productivity still needs
to be increased, and the harvesting process
requires high energy. Production and
operational costs are also major constraints
to the commercial production of biofuels
from microalgae.
For the future, there is a great
opportunity to increase the use of
microalgae in decarbonization efforts.
Innovations
in
renewable
energy
technologies and resource management, as
well as a better understanding of microalgae
physiology, will be key in meeting this
challenge. With the right approach,
microalgae can play an important role in
achieving decarbonization goals and
reducing the impact of global climate
change.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express his
sincere gratitude to all those who have
contributed in completing the journal
review. Grateful thanks to the family,
supervisors, and colleagues who helped and
contributed, supported, and guided. Their
valuable inputs significantly enriched the
quality and depth of the journal review.
[2]
Anser, M. K., Alharthi, M., Aziz, B.,
& Wasim, S. (2020). Impact of
Urbanization, Economic Growth,
and Population Size on Residential
Carbon Emissions in the SAARC
Countries. Clean Technologies and
Environmental Policy, 22(4), 923–
936. doi: 10.1007/s10098-02001833-y
[3]
Hota, P., Das, A., & Maiti, D. K.
(2023). A Short Review on
Generation of Green Fuel Hydrogen
Through
Water
Splitting.
International Journal of Hydrogen
Energy, 48(2), 523–541. doi:
10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2022.09.264
[4]
Awodumi, O. B., & Adewuyi, A. O.
(2020). The Role of Non-Renewable
Energy Consumption in Economic
Growth and Carbon Emission:
Evidence from Oil Producing
Economies in Africa. Energy
Strategy Reviews, 27, 100434. doi:
10.1016/j.esr.2019.100434
[5]
Khan, Z., Ali, M., Kirikkaleli, D.,
Wahab, S., & Jiao, Z. (2020). The
Impact of Technological Innovation
and
Public-Private
Partnership
Investment
on
Sustainable
Environment
in
China:
Consumption-Based
Carbon
Emissions Analysis. Sustainable
Development, 28(5), 1317–1330.
doi: 10.1002/sd.2086
[6]
Yin, K., Liu, L., & Gu, H. (2022).
Green Paradox or Forced Emission
Reduction - The Dual Effects of
Environmental
Regulation
on
Carbon Emissions. International
Journal of Environmental Research
and Public Health, 19(17). doi:
10.3390/ijerph191711058
[7]
Wang, X., & Hong, Y. (2022).
Microalgae Biofilm and Bacteria
Symbiosis in Nutrient Removal and
Carbon Fixation from Wastewater: A
Review. Current Pollution Reports,
References
[1]
Abeydeera, L. H. U. W., Mesthrige,
J. W., & Samarasinghalage, T. I.
(2019). Global Research on Carbon
Emissions: A Scientometric Review.
Environmental Impact Assessment
Review,
11(14),
1–24.
doi:
doi:10.3390/su11143972
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 6
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
8(2), 128–146. doi: 10.1007/s40726022-00214-x
[8]
[9]
Kirikkaleli, D., Güngör, H., &
Adebayo,
T.
S.
(2022).
Consumption-Based
Carbon
Emissions,
Renewable
Energy
Consumption,
Financial
Development and Economic Growth
in Chile. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 31(3), 1123–1137. doi:
10.1002/bse.2945
Izzati, F., Ababil, P. F., & Abror, H.
(2023). Carbon Capture Utilization
(CCU) sebagai Generator Energi
Listrik menggunakan Allam Cycle
sebagai
Upaya
Dekarbonisasi
Industri
Migas.
Journal
of
Sustainable Energy, 1(1), 1–10.
[10] Liu, M., Zhang, X., Zhang, M., Feng,
Y., Liu, Y., Wen, J., & Liu, L.
(2021). Influencing Factors of
Carbon Emissions in Transportation
Industry Based on C–D Function and
LMDI Decomposition Model: China
as an Example. Environmental
Impact Assessment Review, 90(July
2020),
106623.
doi:
10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106623
[11] Lu, M., & Lai, J. (2020). Review on
Carbon Emissions of Commercial
Buildings.
Renewable
and
Sustainable
Energy
Reviews,
119(October 2019), 109545. doi:
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109545
[12] Sun, L., Qin, L., Taghizadeh-Hesary,
F., Zhang, J., Mohsin, M., &
Chaudhry, I. S. (2020). Analyzing
Carbon Emission Transfer Network
Structure Among Provinces in
China: New Evidence from Social
Network Analysis. Environmental
Science and Pollution Research,
27(18),
23281–23300.
doi:
10.1007/s11356-020-08911-0
[13] Zhang, X., Jiao, K., Zhang, J., &
Guo, Z. (2021). A Review on Low
Carbon Emissions Projects of Steel
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
Industry in the World. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 306, 127259.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127259
[14] Plazas-Niño, F. A., Ortiz-Pimiento,
N. R., & Montes-Páez, E. G. (2022).
National
Energy
System
Optimization
Modelling
for
Decarbonization Pathways Analysis:
A Systematic Literature Review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews,
162(March).
doi:
10.1016/j.rser.2022.112406
[15] Smil, V. (2019). What We need to
Know About the Pace of
Decarbonization. Substantia, 3(2),
69–73. doi: 10.13128/Substantia-700
[16] Grubert, E., & Hastings-Simon, S.
(2022). Designing the MidTransition: A Review of MediumTerm Challenges for Coordinated
Decarbonization in the United States.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:
Climate Change, 13(3), 1–19. doi:
10.1002/wcc.768
[17] Papadis, E., & Tsatsaronis, G.
(2020).
Challenges
in
the
Decarbonization of the Energy
Sector. Energy, 205, 118025. doi:
10.1016/j.energy.2020.118025
[18] Lilliestam, J., Patt, A., & Bersalli, G.
(2021). The Effect of Carbon Pricing
on Technological Change for Full
Energy Decarbonization: A Review
of Empirical Ex-Post Evidence.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:
Climate Change, 12(1), 1–21. doi:
10.1002/wcc.681
[19] Priyadharsini, P., Nirmala, N.,
Dawn, S. S., Baskaran, A.,
SundarRajan, P., Gopinath, K. P., &
Arun,
J.
(2022).
Genetic
Improvement of Microalgae for
Enhanced
Carbon
Dioxide
Sequestration and Enriched Biomass
Productivity: Review on CO2 BioFixation Pathways Modifications.
Algal Research, 66(April), 102810.
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 7
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2022.102810
[20] Prayitno, J., Admirasari, R., Sudinda,
T. W., & Winanti, W. S. (2021).
Teknologi Penangkapan Karbon
Dengan Mikroalga : Peluang Dan
Tantangan
Dalam
Mitigasi
Perubahan Iklim. Pusat Teknologi
Lingkungan, OR PPT Badan Riset
dan Inovasi Nasional, 14(2), 91–100.
[21] Ashokkumar, V., Chen, W. H.,
Kamyab, H., Kumar, G., AlMuhtaseb,
A.
H.,
&
Ngamcharussrivichai, C. (2019).
Cultivation of Microalgae Chlorella
sp. in Municipal Sewage for Biofuel
Production and Utilization of
Biochar Derived from Residue for
the Conversion of Hematite Iron Ore
(Fe2O3) to Iron (Fe) – Integrated
Algal Biorefinery. Energy, 189,
116128.
doi:
10.1016/j.energy.2019.116128
[22] Chauhan, D. S., Goswami, G.,
Dineshbabu, G., Palabhanvi, B., &
Das, D. (2020). Evaluation and
Optimization of Feedstock Quality
for Direct Conversion of Microalga
Chlorella sp. FC2 IITG into
Biodiesel via Supercritical Methanol
Transesterification.
Biomass
Conversion and Biorefinery, 10(2),
339–349. doi: 10.1007/s13399-01900432-2
[23] Iglina, T., Iglin, P., & Pashchenko,
D. (2022). Industrial CO2 Capture by
Algae: A Review and Recent
Advances.
Sustainability
(Switzerland),
14(7).
doi:
10.3390/su14073801
[24] Vale, M. A., Ferreira, A., Pires, J. C.
M., & Gonçalves, G. A. L. (2020).
CO2 Capture Using Microalgae.
Advances in Carbon Capture:
Methods,
Technologies
and
Applications,
381–405.
doi:
10.1016/B978-0-12-8196571.00017-7
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
[25] Ghisolfi, V., Tavasszy, L. A.,
Correia, G. H. de A., Chaves, G. de
L. D., & Ribeiro, G. M. (2022).
Freight Transport Decarbonization:
A Systematic Literature Review of
System
Dynamics
Models.
Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(6).
doi: 10.3390/su14063625
[26] Hoang, A. T., Sirohi, R., Pandey, A.,
Nižetić, S., Lam, S. S., Chen, W. H.,
… Pham, V. V. (2022). Biofuel
Production
from
Microalgae:
Challenges
and
Chances.
Phytochemistry
Reviews
(Vol.
0123456789). doi: 10.1007/s11101022-09819-y
[27] Griffiths, S., Sovacool, B. K., Kim,
J., Bazilian, M., & Uratani, J. M.
(2021). Industrial Decarbonization
via Hydrogen: A Critical and
Systematic
Review
of
Developments,
Socio-Technical
Systems and Policy Options. Energy
Research and Social Science,
80(May),
102208.
doi:
10.1016/j.erss.2021.102208
[28] Azarpour, A., Zendehboudi, S.,
Mohammadzadeh, O., Rajabzadeh,
A. R., & Chatzis, I. (2022). A
Review on Microalgal Biomass and
Biodiesel Production Through CoCultivation
Strategy.
Energy
Conversion
and
Management,
267(May),
115757.
doi:
10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115757
[29] Figueroa‑Torres, G. M., Pittman, J.
K., & Theodoropoulos, C. (2021).
Optimisation
of
Microalgal
Cultivation via Nutrient‑Enhanced
Strategies: The Biorefnery Paradigm.
Biotechnology for Biofuels, 14(64),
1–16.
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-02101912-2
[30] Edo, R., Vinata, Y., & Wulandari, Y.
(2020). Pembuatan Biodiesel dari
Mikroalga Nannochloropsis sp.
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 8
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
Menggunakan
Metode
Transesterifikasi Insitu dengan
Bantuan Katalis Asam Sulfat.
Seminar Nasional Sains dan
Teknologi Terapan, 7(1), 507–514.
Retrieved
from
https://ejurnal.itats.ac.id/sntekpan/ar
ticle/view/1280
[31] Yao, S., Lyu, S., An, Y., Lu, J.,
Gjermansen, C., & Schramm, A.
(2019).
Microalgae–Bacteria
Symbiosis in Microalgal Growth and
Biofuel Production: A Review.
Journal of Applied Microbiology,
126(2),
359–368.
doi:
10.1111/jam.14095
[32] Kumar, L., & Bharadvaja, N. (2020).
A Review on Microalgae Biofuel and
Biorefinery: Challenges and Way
Forward. Energy Sources, Part A:
Recovery,
Utilization
and
Environmental Effects, 00(00), 1–24.
doi:
10.1080/15567036.2020.1836084
[33] Choi, Y. Y., Patel, A. K., Hong, M.
E., Chang, W. S., & Sim, S. J. (2019).
Microalgae Bioenergy with Carbon
Capture and Storage (BECCS): An
Emerging Sustainable Bioprocess for
Reduced CO2 Emission and Biofuel
Production. Bioresource Technology
Reports, 7(March), 100270. doi:
10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100270
[34] Dębowski, M., Zieliński, M.,
Kazimierowicz, J., Kujawska, N., &
Talbierz, S. (2020). Microalgae
Cultivation Technologies as an
Opportunity for Bioenergetic System
Development—Advantages
and
Limitations.
Sustainability
(Switzerland), 12(23), 1–37. doi:
10.3390/su12239980
[35] Amenorfenyo, D. K., Huang, X.,
Zhang, Y., Zeng, Q., Zhang, N., Ren,
J., & Huang, Q. (2019). Microalgae
Brewery Wastewater Treatment:
Potentials,
Benefits
and
the
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
Challenges. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public
Health,
16(11).
doi:
10.3390/ijerph16111910
[36] Bompard, E., Grosso, D., Huang, T.,
Profumo, F., Lei, X., & Li, D. (2018).
World Decarbonization Through
Global Electricity Interconnections.
Energies,
11(7),
1–29.
doi:
10.3390/en11071746
[37] Simas-Rodrigues, C., Villela, H. D.
M., Martins, A. P., Marques, L. G.,
Colepicolo, P., & Tonon, A. P.
(2015). Microalgae for Economic
Applications:
Advantages
and
Perspectives for Bioethanol. Journal
of Experimental Botany, 66(14),
4097–4108. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv130
[38] Chuayboon, S., & Abanades, S.
(2020). An Overview of Solar
Decarbonization Processes, Reacting
Oxide
Materials,
and
Thermochemical
Reactors
for
Hydrogen and Syngas Production.
International Journal of Hydrogen
Energy, 45(48), 25783–25810. doi:
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.098
[39] Wimbadi, R. W., & Djalante, R.
(2020). From Decarbonization to
Low Carbon Development and
Transition: A Systematic Literature
Review of the Conceptualization of
Moving Toward Net-Zero Carbon
Dioxide Emission (1995–2019).
Journal of Cleaner Production, 256,
120307.
doi:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120307
[40] Ma, X., Gao, M., Gao, Z., Wang, J.,
Zhang, M., Ma, Y., & Wang, Q.
(2018). Past, Current, and Future
Research on Microalga-Derived
Biodiesel: A Critical Review and
Bibliometric
Analysis.
Environmental
Science
and
Pollution Research, 25(11), 10596–
10610. doi: 10.1007/s11356-0181453-0
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 9
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
[41] Ubando, A. T., Africa, A. D. M.,
Maniquiz-Redillas, M. C., Culaba,
A. B., Chen, W. H., & Chang, J. S.
(2021). Microalgal Biosorption of
Heavy Metals: A Comprehensive
Bibliometric Review. Journal of
Hazardous Materials, 402(July
2020),
123431.
doi:
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123431
[42] Cheah, W. Y., Ling, T. C., Juan, J.
C., Lee, D. J., Chang, J. S., & Show,
P. L. (2016). Biorefineries of Carbon
Dioxide: From Carbon Capture and
Storage (CCS) to Bioenergies
Production.
Bioresource
Technology, 215, 346–356. doi:
10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.019
[43] Singh, J., & Dhar, D. W. (2019).
Overview of Carbon Capture
Technology: Microalgal Biorefinery
Concept
and
State-of-the-Art.
Frontiers in Marine Science,
6(FEB),
1–9.
doi:
10.3389/fmars.2019.00029
[44] Thomas, D. M., Mechery, J., &
Paulose, S. V. (2016). Carbon
Dioxide Capture Strategies from
Flue Gas Using Microalgae: A
Review. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research, 23(17), 16926–
16940. doi: 10.1007/s11356-0167158-3
[45] Mondal, M., Goswami, S., Ghosh,
A., Oinam, G., Tiwari, O. N., Das, P.,
… Halder, G. N. (2017). Production
of Biodiesel from Microalgae
Through Biological Carbon Capture:
A Review. 3 Biotech, 7(2), 1–21. doi:
10.1007/s13205-017-0727-4
[46] Varanasi, J. L., Prasad, S., Singh, H.,
& Das, D. (2020). Improvement of
Bioelectricity
Generation
and
Microalgal
Productivity
with
Concomitant Wastewater Treatment
in Flat-Plate Microbial Carbon
Capture Cell. Fuel, 263(October),
116696.
doi:
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116696
[47] Rinanti, A. (2016). Biotechnology
Carbon Capture and Storage by
Microalgae to Enhance CO2
Removal Efficiency in ClosedSystem Photobioreactor. Algae Organisms
for
Imminent
Biotechnology. doi: 10.5772/62915
[48] Severo, I. A., Deprá, M. C., Zepka,
L. Q., & Jacob-Lopes, E. (2019).
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Use by
Microalgae in Photobioreactors.
Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and
Storage: Using Natural Resources
for Sustainable Development, 151–
171.
doi:
10.1016/B978-0-12816229-3.00008-9
[49] Yue, D., Gong, J., & You, F. (2015).
Synergies Between Geological
Sequestration
and
Microalgae
Biofixation for Greenhouse Gas
Abatement: Life Cycle Design of
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and
Storage Supply Chains. ACS
Sustainable
Chemistry
and
Engineering, 3(5), 841–861. doi:
10.1021/sc5008253
[50] Kasiri, S., Ulrich, A., & Prasad, V.
(2015). Kinetic Modeling and
Optimization of Carbon Dioxide
Fixation
Using
Microalgae
Cultivated in Oil-Sands Process
Water.
Chemical
Engineering
Science, 137, 697–711. doi:
10.1016/j.ces.2015.07.004
[51] Maheshwari, N., Krishna, P. K.,
Thakur, I. S., & Srivastava, S.
(2020). Biological Fixation of
Carbon Dioxide and Biodiesel
Production
Using
Microalgae
Isolated from Sewage Waste Water.
Environmental
Science
and
Pollution Research, 27(22), 27319–
27329. doi: 10.1007/s11356-01905928-y
[52] Prayitno, J., Rahmasari, I. I., & Rifai,
A. (2020). Pengaruh Interval Waktu
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 10
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
Panen terhadap Produksi Biomassa
Chlorella sp. dan Melosira sp. untuk
Penangkapan Karbon secara Biologi.
Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan, 21(1),
23–30. doi: 10.29122/jtl.v21i1.3777
[53] Kong, W., Shen, B., Lyu, H., Kong,
J., Ma, J., Wang, Z., & Feng, S.
(2021). Review on Carbon Dioxide
Fixation Coupled with Nutrients
Removal from Wastewater by
Microalgae. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 292, 125975. doi:
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125975
[54] Moraes, L., da Rosa, G. M., Cardias,
B. B., dos Santos, L. O., & Costa, J.
A.
V.
(2016).
Microalgal
Biotechnology for Greenhouse Gas
Control: Carbon Dioxide Fixation by
Spirulina sp. at Different Diffusers.
Ecological Engineering, 91, 426–
431.
doi:
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.02.035
[55] Morales, M., Sánchez, L., & Revah,
S. (2018). The Impact of
Environmental Factors on Carbon
Dioxide Fixation by Microalgae.
FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(3),
1–11. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx262
[56] Dickinson, S., Mientus, M., Frey, D.,
Amini-Hajibashi, A., Ozturk, S.,
Shaikh, F., … El-Halwagi, M. M.
(2017). A Review of Biodiesel
Production from Microalgae. Clean
Technologies and Environmental
Policy, 19(3), 637–668. doi:
10.1007/s10098-016-1309-6
[57] Peng, L., Fu, D., Chu, H., Wang, Z.,
& Qi, H. (2020). Biofuel Production
from Microalgae: A Review.
Environmental Chemistry Letters,
18(2),
285–297.
doi:
10.1007/s10311-019-00939-0
[58] Faried, M., Samer, M., Abdelsalam,
E., Yousef, R. S., Attia, Y. A., & Ali,
A. S. (2017). Biodiesel Production
from
Microalgae:
Processes,
Technologies
and
Recent
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
Advancements. Renewable and
Sustainable
Energy
Reviews,
79(February),
893–913.
doi:
10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.199
[59] Rahul S, M., Sundaramahalingam,
M. A., Shivamthi, C. S., Shyam
Kumar, R., Varalakshmi, P.,
Karthikumar, S., … Pugazhendhi, A.
(2021). Insights about Sustainable
Biodiesel
Production
from
Microalgae Biomass: A Review.
International Journal of Energy
Research, 45(12), 17028–17056.
doi: 10.1002/er.6138
[60] Faruque, M. O., Razzak, S. A., &
Hossain, M. M. (2020). Application
of Heterogeneous Catalysts for
Biodiesel
Production
from
Microalgal
Oil—A
Review.
Catalysts,
10(9),
1–25.
doi:
10.3390/catal10091025
[61] Sun, C. H., Fu, Q., Liao, Q., Xia, A.,
Huang, Y., Zhu, X., … Chang, H. X.
(2019). Life-Cycle Assessment of
Biofuel Production from Microalgae
via Various Bioenergy Conversion
Systems. Energy, 171, 1033–1045.
doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.074
[62] Hallenbeck, P. C., Grogger, M.,
Mraz, M., & Veverka, D. (2016).
Solar Biofuels Production with
Microalgae. Applied Energy, 179,
136–145.
doi:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.024
[63] Suparmaniam, U., Lam, M. K.,
Uemura, Y., Lim, J. W., Lee, K. T.,
& Shuit, S. H. (2019). Insights Into
the
Microalgae
Cultivation
Technology and Harvesting Process
for Biofuel Production: A Review.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews, 115(January), 109361. doi:
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109361
[64] Mehariya, S., Goswami, R. K.,
Verma, P., Lavecchia, R., & Zuorro,
A. (2021). Integrated Approach for
Wastewater Treatment and Biofuel
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 11
Margin: Atas 3cm dan bawah 2 cm
Production
in
Microalgae
Biorefineries. Energies, 14(8). doi:
10.3390/en14082282
[65] Daneshvar, E., Wicker, R. J., Show,
P. L., & Bhatnagar, A. (2022).
Biologically-Mediated
Carbon
Capture
and
Utilization
by
Microalgae Towards Sustainable
CO2 Biofixation and Biomass
Valorization – A Review. Chemical
Engineering Journal, 427(May
2021),
130884.
doi:
10.1016/j.cej.2021.130884
[66] Li, S., Li, X., & Ho, S. H. (2022).
How to Enhance Carbon Capture by
Evolution
of
Microalgal
Photosynthesis? Separation and
Purification
Technology,
291(February),
120951.
doi:
10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120951
Margin: Kanan dan kiri 2,5 cm
Zharmukhamedov, S. K., Nam, H.
G., … Allakhverdiev, S. I. (2017).
Biofuel Production: Challenges and
Opportunities. International Journal
of Hydrogen Energy, 42(12), 8450–
8461.
doi:
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.125
[68] Stephenson, M. H., Ringrose, P.,
Geiger, S., Bridden, M., & Schofield,
D.
(2019).
Geoscience
and
Decarbonization: Current Status and
Future
Directions.
Petroleum
Geoscience, 25(4), 501–508. doi:
10.1144/petgeo2019-084
[67] Rodionova, M. V., Poudyal, R. S.,
Tiwari, I., Voloshin, R. A.,
Vol.. No..Hal..-... 2018 | 12
Download