Wu and Knowke (2012)
Presentation by Mirda Sylvia & Md Mahmudul Hasan
Mikkelsen, (2006)
Case Study: Policy Network Analysis in a Swiss region Canton Lucerne Forest (Creutzburg and Lieberherr, 2021)
OBJECTIVES
IMPLICATIONS
1
Understanding actor’s policy preferences on conflicting
carbon storage in forest VS timber products
1
2
Actors’ perceived importance and information sharing
in the forest policy network
2
FINDINGS
1
Identified actors’ major preferences for climate change
mitigation in the region
2
Mapped network structures and actor relationships
3
Revealed insights into cooperation and conflicts within
Swiss forest policy
4
Predicted a more acceptable policy option
Actor preferences influence policy outcomes
Network structures shape policy decisions
RECOMMENDATIONS
1
Fostering cooperations among actors
2
Enhancing forest policy development
effectiveness
PROS
CONS
1
Revealing complex relationships
(Siddiki, 2022).
1
Risk of oversimplification (Xie,
2009).
2
Identifying key influencers among
actors (Fawcett and Daugbjerg,
2012).
2
It cannot inform change (Bevir and
Rhodes, 2007).
3
Providing more detailed
relationships information hence
enhanced clarity (Siddiki, 2022).
3
Focusing on relationships instead
of policy outputs (Fawcett and
Daugbjerg, 2012).