1
Kodak's Corporate Pride and the Risks of Technological Disruption
Student Full Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Full Title
Instructor Full Name
Due date
2
Introduction:
A "Kodak moment" denoted anything that was important enough to be treasured and
enjoyed in the past. The phrase is now used more frequently as a business bogeyman to alert
executives to the need to act when disruptive innovations intrude on the market they serve.
Sadly, as time passes, the specifics of what precisely transpired at Eastman Kodak are lost,
causing executives to make erroneous inferences about its difficulties.
Selling film was Kodak's primary source of revenue, thus it is understandable why the
previous few decades were difficult. Digital cameras then vanished in favor of cellphones.
Pictures are now shared and stored online instead of printing. Still, people are now printing
holiday cards and recollection books, but that amount is nothing compared to Kodak's prime.
Prior to emerging as a significantly smaller corporation in 2013, the company departed legacy
industries, sold off its patents, and sought for bankruptcy protection. The corporation, which
was once among the most dominant in the world, now has a market value of less than $1
billion.
The Role of Technology:
The decline of Kodak is frequently attributed to the digital transformation, which
benefited so many enterprises and sectors. Technology is also a major factor in Kodak's decline.
Early inventions by Kodak, particularly the invention of film rolls in the late 19th century,
transformed photography and cemented its supremacy. Despite being the first to create
a digital camera, Kodak reportedly declined to switch to digital photography due to a
combination of conceit and dogma that marketing might be able to convince its customers to
disregard it.
3
Technological innovations
Executing something versus doing the correct thing are two distinct concepts. Kodak
bungled their digital camera investment, overextending the marketplace by attempting to
surpass the effectiveness of conventional film rather than embracing the convenience of digital.
This critique may have been valid for Kodak's first digital cameras, but the company eventually
adopted simplicity and established a strong market presence with tools that made it simple to
transfer images from cameras to computers. It made Photoshop available for usage by both
private users and companies to edit their photographs
With Kodak cameras, people quit using analog photos and switched to smartphone
photography. Even if Kodak had been fully aware of the impending digital change, it would have
been difficult for company to go from a 70 percent market share analog film industry to a
considerably smaller role in the digital photo market.
Points of Interest
The Kodak case has a number of interesting aspects that deserve special attention. First
off, the corporation played a leading role in the development of digital photography, but it was
unable to profit from this breakthrough, highlighting the gap between conception and
implementation. Organizations without a strategic vision frequently fall victim to this
disconnect. Second, the importance of a client-centric strategy is highlighted by Kodak's
inability to adjust to shifting customer preferences. Kodak's obsession on promoting film was
completely out of sync with commercial realities in a period where people were rapidly
preferring digital photography. Thirdly, Kodak's tale highlights the value of promoting an agile
4
and adaptable culture within an organization. It offers a harsh lesson that power, stature, and
track record are not impenetrable barriers to change.
Recommendations and Ideas:
As demonstrated by Kodak's wasted possibilities with the digital camera, businesses
should actively seek out and invest in cutting-edge technologies to successfully traverse the
obstacles of the always changing business landscape. Avoiding the limited focus that restricted
Kodak's capacity to adapt requires the development of a long-term corporate plan that
considers changing technological and market dynamics. Businesses must cultivate an
organizational culture that prioritizes flexibility and adaptability if they want to quickly change
course in response to shifting market circumstances. As Kodak's dependency on its marketing
might over consumer demands highlighted, it is essential to prioritize a customer-first strategy,
understanding, and addressing client needs and preferences. Additionally, encouraging lifelong
learning and a receptivity to new technology, including spending on personnel development
and training, is essential for being inventive and competitive.
Conclusion
The motion picture and film industries benefited greatly from digital technology. Sadly,
for Kodak, that potential did not accrue to it as a result of its market dominance. The growth
and collapse of Kodak serve as a sobering warning about the transformative potential of
advances in technology and the dangers of corporate haughtiness. Companies today must be
prepared, progressive, and open to innovation if they want to succeed in a world where
disruptive technology is the norm. Kodak's past provides an invaluable lesson for companies all
5
around the world, serving as a reminder that even industry titans can fall if they are unable to
keep up with the pace of technological change.