RESTRICTED A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TISSUE RESPONSE UNDER THE RIDGE LAP AND MODIFIED RIDGELAP PONTICS. Prepared by MAJOR NADIA JAHAN TRAINEE GRADING IN PROSTHODONTICS DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHODONTICS 2021 - 2022 ARMED FORCES MEDICAL INSTITUTE DHAKA CANTONMENT, DHAKA I RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Declaration I humbly proclaim that this dissertation titled “A comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics” has been accomplished by me and it had not been previously presented for any higher degree. The work was carried out in the department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka, under the guidance and supervision of Col Md Tariquzzaman, Classified Specialist and Head of the Department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Dated: Armed Forces Medical Institute Dhaka Cantonment, Dhaka. ----------------------------------------Major Nadia Jahan II RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Forwarding Certified that Major Nadia Jahan carried out this research titled „„A Comparative Study On Tissue Response Under The Ridge Lap And Modified Ridgelap Pontics” prepared this dissertation under my direct supervision. I have found the work and the dissertation satisfactory for partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Diploma in Prosthodontics Examinations of Bangladesh University of Professional (BUP). _______________________________ Signature of Supervisor Md Tariquzzaman, D-Prostho,FCPS Col Head of the Department of Prosthodontics Military Dental Centre Dhaka IV RESTRICTED RESTRICTED REMARKS -------------------------------------------------Signature of Head of the Department Md Tariquzzaman, D-Prostho,FCPS Col Head of the Department of Prosthodontics Military Dental Centre Dhaka V RESTRICTED RESTRICTED REMARKS ---------------------------------------------------Brig Gen Md Abdur Rab, FCPS Commandant Military Dental Centre Dhaka Dhaka Cantonment, and Acting Consultant Dental Surgeon General Directorate General Medical Services VI RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Dedicated To My beloved parents VII RESTRICTED RESTRICTED ABSTRACT Background: Edentulous space are frequently restored by fixed partial dentures (FPD), but this may also contribute to various problems. The pontic or an artificial tooth is the main component of a fixed partial denture . The function of pontic is to withstand masticatory load, to permit effective oral hygiene, preserves underlying residual mucosa and adjacent abutment teeth thus provides esthetics as well as restore function. Objective: To observe the tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontic. Materials and methods: This study was conducted in the department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka. A total number of 40 patients were selected with the history of missing first mandibular teeth reporting in the Department of Prosthodontics, MDC Dhaka. The patients completed questionnaire regarding their age, sex, condition of the tooth. The teeth was categorized into two groups:Group- I: consists 20 patients with ridgelap pontics, Group- II: consists 20 patients with modified ridgelap pontics. Results: 40 diagnosed mandibular 1st molar missing patients were included in this study. All these patients were evaluated under 2 parameters. The parameters are the condition of mucous membrane and the condition of abutment tooth. In case of group A maximum patients were found in grade IV whereas in group B maximum patients were found in grade I. The chi-square test was done as the test of significance and the p value was <0.05 which was statistically significant. Conclusion: After completion of this study it is concluded that the tissue response with the modified ridgelap pontic of fixed partial denture in 1st molar missing tooth achieved better success regarding fixed partial denture. VIII RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Table of Content Chapter and Section No Page No Acknowledgement XIV Chapter I: Introduction 1:1.0 Background 2-3 1:2.0 Rationale of the study 4 1:3.0 Research question 5 1:4.0 Objectives 6 1:5.0 Review of literature 7-9 CHAPTER II: Materials and Methods 2:1.0 Type of Study 11 2:2.0 Place of study 11 2:3.0 Period of study 11 2:4.0 Study population 11 2:5.0 Sample Size 11-12 2:6.0 Sampling method 12 2:7.0 Inclusion criteria 12 2:8.0 Exclusion criteria 13 2:9.0 Operational definition 13 2:10.0 Grouping 13 2:11.0 Equipment 14 IX RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 2:12.1 Main outcome variable 14 2:12.2 Independent variable 15 2:13.0 Study procedure 15-16 2:14.0 Flowchart 17 2:15.0 Ethical consideration 17 2:16.0 Data collection technique 18 2:17.0 Data analysis 18 Chapter III: Results 19-25 Chapter IV: Discussion 4:1.0 Discussion 26-30 4:2.0 Limitation 31 4:3.0 Conclusion 32 4:4.0 Recommendations 33 References cited 34-37 Appendices Appendix –I Data collection sheet XV-XVII Appendix –II Consent form XVIII-XX Appendix-III Ethical clearance XXI-XXIX Appendix-IV Figure XXIX-XXX X RESTRICTED RESTRICTED List of Tables Table No Table-1 Title Page Distribution of patients according to age.(n=40) Table -2 Distribution of patients between group A and B 20 21 regarding condition of mucous membrane observed after 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months Table -3 Distribution of patients between group A and B regarding condition of abutment teeth observed after 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months XI RESTRICTED 24 RESTRICTED List of Figures Figure Title Page No Figure-1 Distribution of patients of group A regarding 22 condition of mucous membrane observed after 6 months Figure-2 Distribution of patients of group B regarding 23 condition of mucous membrane observed after 6 months Figure-3 Dental spoon excavator XXIX Figure-4 Dental mirror XXIX Figure-5 Dental periodontal probe XXX Figure-5 Dental caries probe XXX XII RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Abbreviation FPD- Fixed partial denture Co-Cr- Cobalt Chromium GI- gingival index CI- calculus index PD- probing depth GR- gingival recession TM- tooth mobility SD- Standard deviation XIII RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Acknowledgement First of all,I am grateful to Almighty Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful, for enabling me to complete this dissertation. I wish to express my heartfelt gratitude to my supervisor Col Md. Tariquzzaman,D-Prostho,FCPS,Classified Specialist in Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka. I am indebted to him for guiding interest, intellectual inputs, constant supervision, valuable suggestions, advice and whole hearted co-operation from the beginning to end of the study. With my great pleasure and heartfelt gratitude,I acknowledge the scholarly guidance and constructive suggestion provided by Brig Gen Md Abdur Rab, FCPS,Commandant Military Dental Centre Dhaka and Acting Consultant Dental Surgeon General,Directorate General Medical Services for his inspiration and valuable suggestions, patronage and provision of excellent working and learning environment in the preparation and completion of this dissertation. I want to express my sincere gratitude to Lt Col S.M.Nazrul Islam, PBGMS,MPH,D-Prostho,Graded Specialist in Prosthodontics Military Dental Centre Dhaka. I am grateful to him for his encouragement,inspiration, valuable suggestions, advice and co-operation till the end of the study. Last but not the least, I offer my sincere thanks and appreciation to all of my senior and junior colleagues of Military Dental Centre Dhaka, who have gone unmentioned, for their support and assistance in my endeavors. Major Nadia Jahan Trainee Grading in prosthodontics Department of Prosthodontics Military Dental Centre Armed Forces Medical Institute Dhaka Cantonment, Dhaka. XIV RESTRICTED RESTRICTED CHAPTER- I: INTRODUCTION 1 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 1:1.0 Background The pontic or an artificial tooth is the main component of a fixed partial denture. The pontic is defined as “the artificial tooth suspended from the abutment teeth.1 According to the glossary of prosthodontic terms a pontic is defined as “an artificial tooth on a fixed partial denture that replaces a missing natural tooth restores its functions, and usually fills the space previously occupied by the clinical crown.2 In this role, the pontic should restore function, provide esthetics and comfort, be biologically acceptable, permit effective oral hygiene, and preserve underlying residual mucosa.3 There are various types of pontics used in fixed prosthodontics. According to shape the pontic can be divided into ridge lap, modified ridge lap, sanitary, modified sanitary, saddle, modified saddle, conical, bullet and heart shaped pontic. According to material a pontic may be classified in all metal, metal and porcelain, combination of metal and resin.4 The Pontic, as it mechanically unifies the abutment teeth and covers a portion of the residual ridge, assumes a dynamic role as a component of the prosthesis.William Howard Leno and Clarence Puri in 1982 gave the standards of pontics design which stated that: tissue surface of the pontic should be covered for cleaning, pontics should never have positive pressure on the underlying tissue, pontics and connectors must be of adequate built to withstand occlusal forces and also restore esthetics .Commonly used pontic 2 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED designs are ridge lap pontic, modified ridge lap pontic,sanitary pontic,conical pontic, and ovate pontic.5 In ridge lap pontic reduction of the surface area does not significantly improve hygiene underneath the pontic, because the basal contour remains concave, unsuitable to provide a tight contact to the dental floss.6 The pontic should not be designed to pressurize the alveolar mucosa as it may produce ulceration.7,8 Previous concepts of close tissue adaptation are not followed lately. It should be remembered that patient’s maintenance (flossing) is more important than the pontic design.9,10 The aim of this study was to observe tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontic and condition of interdental papilla under the connector of fixed partial denture and to evaluate periodontal status of the abutment teeth. 3 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 1:2.0 Rationale of the study Ridgelap pontics and modified ridgelap pontics are two types of fixed partial denture that are used for replacing missing teeth. After insertion of the partial denture the reaction of mucous membrane beneath the tissue surface and condition of abutment teeth is very important for patients comfort and overall success of the treatment. This study will help prosthodontists to understand the tissue response under the ridgelap and modified ridgelap pontics with an aim to choose a better type of fixed partial denture to maintain patients good oral hygiene, comfort and better life. 4 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 1:3.0 Research question The tissue response is better under the ridge lap or modified ridgelap pontic? 5 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 1:4.0 Objectives 1:4.1 General objective: To observe the tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontic 1:4.2 Specific objectives: 1. To evaluate the condition of mucous membrane beneath the tissue surface of pontic 2. To evaluate the condition of interdental papilla under the connector of fixed partial denture 3. To assess the periodontal status of the abutment teeth 6 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 1:5.0 Review of Literature Stein RS (1966) was found that the tissue response under modified ridgelap pontic is better than ridgelap pontics.The study initially recruited 15 healthy volunteers who have missing mandibular first molar teeth.After 6 weeks follow up visit there were 20.8% patients in grade II and 13.8% patients in grade IV in ridgelap pontics.11 In another study Grisapin (1979) identified that the tissue response in modified ridgelap is better after one month follow up. He found tissue color was normal and there was no overt sign of inflammation or ulceration.12 Hirshberg SM (1972) described that the gingival index was created for the assessment of the gingival condition and records of the qualitative changes in gingiva.It scores of grade I to grade IV.In his research he found 8 patients in grade I, 46 in grade II, 18 in grade III and 4 in grade IV in case of ridge lap pontic after 12 months follow up visit. Hirshberg SM (1972) also identified that modified ridgelap pontic was better than ridge lap pontic in maintaining mucosal health since inflammation developed beneath ridgelap pontic, changing the modified ridgelap pontics to the ridgelap type alleviated inflammation.13 According to the condition of the abutment teeth the group B patients had no different response and in group A patients have very minor response in 6 week up visit. Therefore in our study suggested 6 week follow up visit. 7 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED In a similar study, Tolboe H et al. (1998) identified that five patients developed hypertrophy and pocket formation around the pontics. According to the condition of the abutment teeth it was graded from grade I to IV.Mild to moderate inflammation in the mucosa was estimated with both the modified ridgelap and ridgelap pontic and the mucosal exudation was found when the oral hygiene was omitted in the pontic area.14 Chester S. Handelman measured tissue reaponse of 120 adult Caucasian and African-American subjects divided into four groups of 30 by gender and race. All the groups have different tissue response due to change in pontic design.Tissue color and sign of inflammation are also useful tool in detecting tissue response under pontic area.15 Edmund cavazos jr selected 28 patients,among them 9 are grede I and 7 are in grede II in ridgelap type pontic and 7 patients are grade ii and 5 are grade I in modified ridgelap pontic.Accumulation of food debrish was more when pontics are ridgelap and biopsy shows moderate inflammation with the dissolution of basal layer.16 Allison,J,R and Bhatia investigate into the changes occuring in the oral mucousa beneath different pontics.Tissue respond dramatically to ridgelap and in lesser degree in modified ridgelap.In order to maintain a completely healthy and hygienic condition for fpd, pontic design with minimal adaptation to tissue is preferable.17 8 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Podshadley,A G measured gingival response to different type of pontic designs have identified when properly adapted ridgelap pontics were used, a tissue change was produced under 75% of pontics.25 percents of pontics that are shaped to modified ridgelap had evidently favorable tissue changes. The tissue changes were proportionately increased as a amount of adaption of pontic to ridge increased.18 9 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED CHAPTER- II: MATERIALS AND METHODS 10 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 2:1.0 Study design This was a observational study. 2:2.0 Place of study The study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics in Military Dental Centre Dhaka. 2:3.0 Period of study 1 February 2021 to 31 January 2022 2:4.0 Study population Patients come seeking treatment for their missing mandibular first molar teeth in the department of Prosthodontics, Military dental centre Dhaka will be taken. 2:5.0 Sample size To determine the sample size for this proposed study, the following formula was used: Z2 P(1-P) n= d2 Here, n = Desired sample size Z = Standard normal deviate usually set at 1.96 which corresponds to 95% confidence interval (value for error) P = Proportion of occurrence in the target population (Taken as 50%) 11 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED q = 1 – p = (1 – 0.5) d = Degree of accuracy with 5% error = 0.05 So, using above formula, the expected sample size is (1.96)2 (0.5)(1 – 0.5) n= = 384 (Approx) 2 (0.05) Therefore, the sample size for this study was 384. But, due to time limitation and resource constrain, total 40 patients were taken from Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantonment. 2:6.0Sampling method Purposive sampling. 2:7.0 Inclusion criteria 1. Patients having mandibular 1st molar missing with ideal abutments on both sides as well as having class-1 occlusion. 2. Good systemic health. 3. No history of musculoskeletal or neurological disorders. 4. No history of orthodontic treatment. 5. No history of malignant disease, major or minor surgery in the orofacial region in the past 3 months. 6. Patient willing to participate in the study 12 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 2:8.0 Exclusion criteria 1. Patients who have periodontally compromised abutment 2. Patients with tilted abutment 3. Patients with deformed ridge 4. Patients have edentulous area with recently extracted socket 5. Patients with major psychological disorders 6. Unwilling to participate. 2:9.0 Operational definition: Pontics: An artificial tooth on a fixed partial denture that replaces the missing tooth restores its function and usually fills the space previously filled by the natural crown. They must restore function, be hygienically maintainable, be biologically and esthetically acceptable and be comfortable to the patients.19 Ridgelap pontics: A pontic which resembles natural tooth and is designed to adapt closely to the ridge that compress the tissue surface.19 Modified ridgelap pontics: A pontic which is designed to reduce the tissue contact and have no or pin point contact to the tissue.19 2:10.0 Grouping: Total patients were divided into two groupsGroup A: consists 15 patients with ridgelap pontics Group B: consists 15 patients with modified ridgelap pontics 13 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 2:11.0Equipment: ● Mouth mask; ● Sterile gloves; ● Dental mirror; ● Dental unit; ● Football or wheel shaped diamond, ● Flat ended tapered diamond, ● Finishing stones, explorer, ● Periodontal probe, ● Hatchet, ● Chisel; ● Gingival retraction cord, ● Silicone impression material, ● Temporary cementing material. 2:12.1 Main outcome variable: Two variables were assessed. ● Condition of mucous membrane will be graded under the grading of Carrenza 1996 ● Condition of abutment teeth will be graded under the grading of Carrenza 1996 14 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 2:12.2 Independent variable: ● Age ● Sex ● Educational status ● Monthly income 2:13.0 Study procedure In this study, the sample was made of 30 patients, distributed into 2 groups. One of the groups was treated with ridgelap pontic and another group with modified ridgelap pontic. The subjects were selected according to the above mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria. First teeth were prepared for a metal-ceramic crown. Gingival retraction cord was used to expose the margin. Impression was taken by A-silicon impression material. Model was prepared from the impression and send to laboratory for fabrication of acrylic bridge prosthesis. Before glazing, the prosthesis was tried on patient’s mouth and error was corrected,if any. The prosthesis was inserted by temporary cementing material for follow up. A standardized structured data collection sheet was used to collect necessary information of the study subjects, which include (a) History of the patients: A detailed history of particulars of the patient, socioeconomic status was taken.(b) Clinical examination: condition of the mucous membrane and abutment teeth was noted according to grading in the data sheet. 15 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED The patients will be evaluated at four different points: at the beginning of the treatment, as well as 6 week, 12 weeks and 6 months after initiation of treatment.Patients were graded according to condition of mucous membrane Grade-I: Healthy gingiva Grade-II: Mild inflammation, slight change color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing. Grade-III: Moderate inflammation, redness, edema and bleeding on probing Grade-IV: Severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding.20 And also patients were graded according to condition of abutment teeth Grade-I: No mobility and no pocket depth. Grade-II: 2-3 mm of sulcus depth and slightly more than normal. Grade-III: 3-4 mm of sulcus depth and moderately more than normal mobility. Grade-IV: Above 4mm of sulcus depth severe mobility to faciolingualy and mesiodiastaly.20 16 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 2:14.0 Flow chart showing the sequence of task: Study population ↓ Sample (inclusion and exclusion criteria) ↓ Preparation of questionnaire and data Sheet ↓ Clinical and radiographic examination ↓ Study procedure ↓ Data Collection through structured questionnaire ↓ Data analysis ↓ Results 2.15.0 Ethical consideration Ethical clearance was obtained from the Research Committee of Military Dental Centre (MDC) Dhaka. Permission to use the records will be obtained from the Department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients or legal guardian for this study. Patient confidentiality was strictly maintained. No names, address or contact details of the patients was divulged. 17 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 2:16.0 Data collection technique A standardized structured data collection sheet (Appendix-A) was used to collect necessary information of the subject group. Data sheet included all of the variables regarding to the study. 2:17.0 Data analysis Data will be stored and analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 20) and descriptive statistics to be presented with standard statistical tests (chi-square tests for parametric variables and unpaired Student’s t-test). P (probability) and Z values will also be calculated. 18 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED CHAPTER- III: RESULTS 19 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Results: Total 40 diagnosed patients who have missing first molar teeth were selected from the Department of Prosthodontics of Military Dental Centre Dhaka irrespective of age and sex following some inclusion and exclusion criteria.20 patients were treated with fixed partial denture having ridgelap pontic and were included under group A. Rest 20 patients were treated with fixed partial denture having modified ridgelap pontic and were included under group B.The results were furnished in tables according to the data found. 20 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Table-I: Distribution of patients according to age. (n=40) Age (Years) Number of patients Total Percentage% Male Female 21-25 6 3 9 22.5% 26-30 5 6 11 27.5% 31-35 5 5 10 25% 36-40 6 4 10 25% 22 18 40 Total 100% Table-I showed that among 40 patients, majority 11 (27.5%) patients were in age group of 26-30. 21 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Table II: Distribution of patients between group A and B regarding condition of mucous membrane observed after 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months (n=40) Grades 6 weeks Group A No % 12 weeks Group B Group A No % No % 6 months Group B No % GroupA Group B No % No % 0 00 16 80% Grade I 1 5% 1 5% 1 5% 15 75% Grade II 2 10% 1 5% 1 5% 5 25% 2 10% 4 20% Grade III 10 50% 8 40% 8 40% 0 00 6 30% 0 00 Grade IV 7 35% 10 50% 10 50% 0 00 12 60% 0 00 X2 17.633 32.917 34.667 P value 0.001 0.001 0.001 Table-II showed among 40 patients maximum 60% are grade IV after 6 months interval in group A and 80% are grade I in group B after 6 months interval. Data were analyzed using chi-square Test Significant = P<0.05, Not significant= P>0.05 Group A= Ridge lap pontic, Group B=Modified ridge lap pontic 22 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Figure-I: Distribution of patients of group A regarding condition of mucous membrane observed after 6 months (n=20) Group A Grade I Grade II Grade III Grade IV Figure -I: showed that among 20 patients, majority 12 patients grade IV after 6 months interval. 23 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Figure-II: Distribution of patients of group B regarding condition of mucous membrane observed after 6 months (n=20) . Figure - II showed that among 20 patients, majority 16 patients grade I after 6 months interval 24 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Table III: Distribution of patients between group A and B regarding condition of abutment teeth observed after 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months.(n=40) Grades 6 weeks 12 weeks 6 months Group A Group B Group A Group B NO No No No % % % % Group A No Group B % No % Grade I 3 15% 9 45% 3 15% 10 50% 2 10% 9 45% Grade II 6 30% 7 35% 5 25% 4 20% 5 25% 4 20% Grade III 4 20% 2 10% 7 35% 4 20% 5 25% 5 25% Grade IV 7 35% 2 5 25% 2 10% 8 40% 2 10% X2 P value 10% 6.521 8.063 0.089 0.045 8.166 0.043 Table-III showed among 40 patients maximum 40% are grade IV after 6 months interval in group A and 45% are grade I in group B after 6 months interval. Data were analyzed using chi-square Test Significant = P<0.05Not significant= P>0.05 Group A= Ridge lap pontic, Group B=Modified ridge lap pontic 25 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED CHAPTER- IV: DISCUSSION 26 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 4:1.0 Discussion This was a comparative observational study carried out to evaluate the condition of mucous membrane in patients having ridgelap or modified ridgelap pontic. This study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka from 1 February 2021 to 31 January 2022. The patients of the study were selected from the patients who have attended in the department of Prosthodontics for the treatment of their missing teeth. In group A, the pontic forms a large concave contact with the ridges. The tendency of concavity of pontic was greater in the under surface and it had a slightly larger area of tissue contact. In group B, the pontic does not contact the lingual aspect of the ridge, while facially it is in contact with the ridge. It was made convex in all tissue contacting surface and the gingival surface of the pontics overlaps only the buccal surface of the ridge. In present study there were 5% patients in grade I, 10% patients in grade II, 50% patients in grade III and 35% patients in grade IV in ridgelap pontics after six weeks follow up visit.And 5% patients in grade I, 5% patients in grade II, 40% patients in grade III and 50% patients in grade IV in modified ridgelap pontics after six weeks follow up visit.The p value was .001 which was significant. In a similar study Stein RS (1966) was found that the tissue response under modified ridgelap pontic is better than ridgelap pontics. The study initially 27 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED recruited 15 healthy volunteers who have missing mandibular first molar teeth. After 6 weeks follow up visit there were 20.8% patients in grade II and 13.8% patients in grade IV in ridgelap pontics.11 In present study there were 5% patients in grade I, 5% patients in grade II, 40% patients in grade III and 50% patients in grade IV in ridgelap pontics after 12 weeks follow up visit.And 75% patients in grade I, 25% patients in grade II, 00% patients in grade III and 00% patients in grade IV in modified ridgelap pontics after 12 weeks follow up visit.The p value was .001 which was significant.The tissue response after 12 weeks of the modified ridgelap pontic was favourable, 75%patients(maximum) were grade I. Tissue color was normal and there was no overt sign of inflammation or ulceration. In another study Grisapin (1979) identified that the tissue response in modified ridgelap is better after 12 weeks follow up. He found tissue color was normal and there was no overt sign of inflammation or ulceration.12 In present study there were 00% patients in grade I, 10% patients in grade II, 30% patients in grade III and 60% patients in grade IV in ridgelap pontics after 6 months follow up visit.And 80% patients in grade I, 20% patients in grade II, 00% patients in grade III and 00% patients in grade IV in modified ridgelap pontics after 6 months follow up visit.The p value was .001 which was significant. Hirshberg SM (1972) described that the gingival index was created for the assessment of the gingival condition and records the qualitative changes in 28 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED gingiva. It scores of grade I to grade IV.In his research he found 8 patients in grade I, 46 in grade II, 18 in grade III and 4 in grade IV in case of ridge lap pontic after 6 months follow up visit. Hirshberg SM (1972) also identified that modified ridgelap pontic was better than ridge lap pontic in maintaining mucosal health since inflammation developed beneath ridgelap pontic and changing the modified ridgelap pontics to the ridgelap type alleviated inflammation.13 In present study, patients were evaluated between the groups regarding condition of abutment teeth. In case of group A, 3 patients were found in grade I, 6 in grade II, 4 in grade III and 7 in grade IV whereas in group B 9 patients were in grade I, 7 were in grade II, 2 in grade III and 2 patients were found in grade IV, after 6 weeks. The chi-square test was done as the test of significance and the P value was >0.05 which was statistically not significant. After 12 weeks interpretation 3 patients were found in grade I, 5 in grade II, 7 in grade III and 5 were found in grade IV respectively in case of group A, whereas 10 patients were found in grade I, 4 were grade II, 4 were grade III and 2 patients were found in grade IV in case of group B. The chi-square test was done as the test of significance and the P value was <0.05 which was statistically significant. After 6 months interpretation in group A 2 patients were found in grade I, 5 were in grade II, 5 were in grade III and 8 were in grade IV respectively, whereas in group B grade I had 9 patients, grade II had 4 patients and there were 5 patients in grade III and 2 29 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED patients were grade IV respectively. The chi-square test was done as the test of significance and the p value was <0.05 which was statistically significant. According to the condition on the mucous membrane in relation to the ridgelap surface of the pontic the group B patients has shown better response and tissue tolerance then group A patients. Therefore in our study modified ridgelap pontic had better result compare to ridgelap pontic. In a similar study, Tolboe H et al. (1998) identified that five patients developed hypertrophy and pocket formation around the pontics. According to the condition of the abutment teeth it was graded from grade I to IV.Mild to moderate inflammation in the mucosa was estimated with both the modified ridgelap and ridgelap pontic and the mucosal exudation was found when the oral hygiene was omitted in the pontic area.14 30 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 4:2.0 Limitation of the study The findings of this study cannot be generalized to the whole population as the sample size was not large enough and the data of this study were collected from single centre , Military Dental Centre Dhaka. 31 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 4:3.0 Conclusion After completion of this observational comparative study it is concluded that the tissue response with the modified ridgelap pontic in 1st molar missing tooth enhanced the condition of the mucous membrane beneath the tissue surface of the pontic, condition of interdental papillae, condition of the abutment tooth and mucosa overlying the edentulous ridge and achieved better success regarding fixed partial denture. 32 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 4:4.0 Recommendations ● This study would suggest that the clinician should evaluate the abutment teeth carefully during examination.. ● The study should be conducted on a long-term basis with large sample size to evaluate the causes of abutment tooth condition. ● Clinician should care full in work like mobility examination, periodontal probing. 33 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED REFERENCES CITED 34 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 1. Faucher RR, ‘A system for localizing pontics’,The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1984, vol.52,pp 643–7. 2. Pine B, ‘Pontics for gold-acrylic resin fixed partial dentures.,The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1962,vol 12,pp 347–8. 3. Kaplan M. Fiji, ‘Race and Pontics in an Island State. MICHAEL C. HOWARD.AmericanEthnologist1994’; 21: 1032–3. 4. Becker CM,‘Current theories of crown contour, margin placement and pontic design’, Journal of Prosthodontics Dentistry 2005, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 107-114. 5. Binkley TK, Noble RM, Wilson DC. Natural teeth pontics for a cast metal resin-bonded prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56: 531–5. 6. Kim TH, Cascione D, Knezevic A, Nowzari H. Restoration using gingiva-colored ceramic and a ridge lap pontic with circumferential pressure: a clinical report. J ProsthetDent 2010; 104:71–6. 7. Behrend DA,‘The design of multiple pontics’, Journal of Prosthondontic Dentistry 1981, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 634-38. 8. Crispin BJ,‘Tissue response to posterior denture base-type pontics’, Journal of Prosthondontic Dentistry 1979, vol. 42, no. 3, pp 257-61. 9. Silness J, Gustavsen F, Mangersnes K , ‘The relationship between pontic hygiene and mucosal inflammation in fixed 35 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED bridge recipients’, Journal of Periodontal Research 1982, vol. 17, pp. 434-39. 10. Thayer KE, ‘Pontics and pontic form’, In: Fixed prosthodontics 1984, Chap. 16. Pp218-27. 11. Stein RS (1966), ‘Fixed partial denture’, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 2, pp 251-85. 12. Grisapin,Anthony HLT (1983),‘ A sanitary arc-fixed partial denture: concept and technique of pontic design’, Journal of Prosthondontic Dentistry, vol. 50, no. (3): 338-41. 13. Hirshberg SM (1972), ‘The relationship of oral hygiene to embrasure and pontic design-A preliminary study, vol. 27, no. 1, pp 26-38. 14. Tolboe H, Isidor F, Jorgensen BE, KaaberS (1987), ‘Influence of oral hygiene on the mucosal conditions beneath bridge pontics’, Scand J Dent Res, vol. 94, pp 475-82. 15. Barnes CM, Russell CM,Chester S.Handelman Reinhardt RA (2005), ‘Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: Effect of bleeding, gingivitis and supragingival plaque’, J Clin Dent, vol. 16. Pp 71-77. 16. Cavazos E (1968),’ Tissue response to fixed partial denture pontics’, Journal of Prosthondontic Dentistry, vol. 20, no. 2, pp 143-53. 36 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 17. Allison,J,R and Bhatia,Behrend DA (1981), ‘The design of multiple pontics’, Journal of Prosthondontic Dentistry, vol. 46, no. 6, pp 63438. 18. Podshadely AG (1968), ‘Gingival response to pontics’, Journal of Prosthondontic Dentistry, vol.19, no. 1, pp 51-57. 19. Deepak N (2003), ‘Pontic design’ In: Textbook of prosthodontics, 1st ed., pp 506-25. 12. 20. Caranza RA (1996), ‘Gingival index and plaque index’, Clinical periodontology, 8th ed. pp 63-68. 37 RESTRICTED RESTRICTED CHAPTER- V: APPENDICES xv RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Data Collection Sheet SL. NO. Date: Title: “A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TISSUE RESPONSE UNDER THE RIDGE LAP AND MODIFIED RIDGELAP PONTICS.” Investigator: Major Nadia Jahan, Grading Trainee, Department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantt. Supervisor: Col Md Tariquzzaman,D-prostho,FCPS,Classified Specialist in Prosthodontics.Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Dhaka Cantt Place of study: Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantt. Patient’s data A.Assessment of the Patient:1. Patient’s name : 2. Address & Contact number : 3. Age and sex : 4. Reg no : 5. Place of resident : 6. Chief complaints : 7. Etiology of missing tooth/teeth 8. Medical history 8 Rural Semirural Urban : Extraction Congenital missing Exfoliation due to trauma Others : HTN DM, Anaemia Hepatic disease Renal disease Bleeding disorder Respiratory disease, etc xvi RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 9. Clinical Findings:a) Condition of mucous membrane b) Condition of abutment teeth 10. : : 11. Radiological Findings : a) OPG b) IOPA view Reason for seeking treatment 12. Diagnosis Grade-I : Healthy gingival Grade-II : Mild inflammation, slight change color, slight edema, no bleeding on probing. Grade-III : Moderate inflammation, redness, edema and bleeding on probing Grade-IV : Severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. Grade-I : No mobility and no pocket depth. Grade-II : 2-3 mm of sulcus depth and slightly more than normal. Grade-III : 3-4 mm of sulcus depth and moderately more than normal mobility. Grade-IV : Above 4mm of sulcus depth severe mobility to faciolingualy and mesiodiastaly Poor aesthetics Difficulties in mastication Speech problem : ………………….. ……………………………….. Date: Signature of data collector xvii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Informed Written Consent Form 1. Protocol ID: 2. Patient ID: 3. Title of the study:: “A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON TISSUE RESPONSE UNDER THE RIDGE LAP AND MODIFIED RIDGELAP PONTICS.”. 4. Investigator`s name: Major Nadia Jahan, Grading Trainee, Department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantt. 5. Institution/organization: Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantt. 6. Purpose &nature of the study: The purpose of the study to assess the periodontal condition of natural teeth in contact with the removable partial denture. 7. Selection of the participant: The study population is patients present in outdoor and the department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Center, Dhaka Cantt. 8. Expectation from and involvement of the participant: I hope you will cooperate me to examine you thoroughly and will come to me for follow up. 9. Risk and benefits: No reasonable risk with this study but benefits is to help a research outcome that will help further more appropriate management with Removable Partial Denture. 10. Privacy, anonymity, confidentiality: Your Information will be kept secret. You have given the permission to publish photographs for publication in any form if needed for the public interest. 11. Right to withdraw: You are free to take part or withdraw yourself from the study at any time for any reason. If you are agreeing to our proposal of enrolling you / your patient in our study, Please indicate that by putting your Signature or left thumb impression at the specified below. Thank you for your cooperation. xviii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED -------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Signature or Left Thumb Impression of the Signature or Left Thumb Impression Attendant/Guardian -------------------------------------Signature of the Investigator of the Participant --------------------------------------------------Signature or Left Thumb Impression of a Witness xix RESTRICTED RESTRICTED সম্মতি পত্র Title of the study: Investigator`s name: Major Nadia Jahan. এই ম্মতি পত্রের উত্রেলয আপনাত্রে প্রত্রয়াজনীয় িথ্য প্রদান েরা, যয িথ্য গুত্রা আপনাত্রে তদ্ধান্ত তনত্রি াাযয েরত্রব, আপতন এই গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রণ েরত্রবন তে না। গবেষণার ঝুতি : এই গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রনেৃি যরাগীত্রদর তেছু পরীক্ষা েরা ত্রব, এত্রি যোন ঝুুঁ তের ম্ভাবনা নাই। গবেষণার অংশগ্রহবের সু তেধাতি : এই গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রন েরত্র উক্ত যরাত্রগর ঠিে তিতেৎা পদ্ধতি ম্পত্রেে বণেনা যদওয়া ত্রব। ফত্র তিতেৎায় মান বৃ তদ্ধ পাত্রব এবং পরবিীত্রি উক্ত যরাত্রগ অু স্থিার ার হ্রা পাত্রব। তেিল্প : এই গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রন েরা তেংবা না েরার বযাপাত্রর অথ্বা অংলগ্রন েরার পর যযত্রোন ময় আপতন গত্রবণা যথ্ত্রে ত্রর যযত্রি পারত্রবন। খরচ : এই গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রত্রনর জনয আপনার যোন খরি যনই বা আপনাত্রে যোন অথ্ে যদয়া ত্রব না। গগাপেীয়িা : গত্রবণা িাোীন ও পরবিীত্রি ে িথ্য েত্র ারভাত্রব যগাপন রাখা ত্রব । আপনার বাতক্তগি তবয়াতদ িথ্য তবত্রেণ প্রতিত্রবদন তিতর ও প্রোলনার োত্রজ বযাবার েরা ত্রব এবং গত্রবণার পরীক্ষে বযিীি োত্ররা োত্রছ প্রোল েরা ত্রবনা ।ফলে আপনার যোন িথ্য যেউ জানত্রি পারত্রব না । গেচ্ছামূ লি অংশগ্রহে : এই গত্রবণায় আপনার অংলগ্রন ম্পূ ণে যেচ্ছামূ ে । আপতন গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রত্রন অেীেৃতি জানাত্রি পাত্ররন অথ্বা গত্রবণা িাোীন যয যোন ময় গত্রবণা যথ্ত্রে আপনার নাম প্রিযাার েত্রর তনত্রি পাত্ররন । িাত্রি আপনার তিতেৎার যোন িারিময ত্রব না । এই ফরত্রম োক্ষর েরত্র আপনার আইনগি যোন অতিোর খবে ত্রব না । প্রশ্নােলী: যতদ আপনার যোন প্রশ্ন থ্াত্রে িত্রব দয়া েত্রর তজজ্ঞাা েরুন, আতম িার উত্তর প্রদান েরার যথ্াািয যিষ্টা েরত্রবা । যতদ ভতবযত্রি আপনার অতিতরক্ত যোন প্রশ্ন থ্াত্রে িাত্র গত্রবণারি ডাক্তাত্ররর াত্রথ্ যযাগাত্রযাগ েরত্রি পাত্ররন । সম্মতি েীিাবরাতি : আতম গত্রবণায় তনত্রয়াতজি তিতেৎত্রের াত্রথ্ এই গত্রবণা তনত্রয় আত্রািনায় ত্রন্তা প্রোল েরতছ । আতম এটা বু ত্রঝতছ যয, গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রন ম্পূ ণে যেচ্ছামূ ে এবং আতম যয যোন ময় যোন বািযবািেিা ছাড়াই গত্রবণা যথ্ত্রে আমাত্রে তবরি রাখত্রি পাতর । আতম উপত্ররাক্ত লিে গুত্রা পত্ররতছ / আমার ম্মু ত্রখ পঠিি ত্রয়ত্রছ এবং যেচ্ছায় গত্রবণায় অংলগ্রত্রন ম্মতি জ্ঞাপন েরতছ । সাক্ষাৎিারগ্রহণিারীর োক্ষর িাতরখ অংশগ্রহণিারীর োক্ষর িাতরখ xx RESTRICTED অতিিােবির োক্ষর িাতরখ RESTRICTED Military Dental Centre Dhaka Dhaka Cantt APPLICATION FOR ETHICAL CLEARANCE OF RESEARCH PROPOSAL xxi RESTRICTED RESTRICTED 1. Investigator: Major Nadia Jahan Trainee Grading in Prosthodontics Department of Prosthodontics. Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Dhaka Cantt 2. Guide: Col Md Tariquzzaman,D-prostho,FCPS Classified Specialist in Prosthodontics. Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Dhaka Cantt. 3. Place of the study: Department of Prosthodontics, Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Dhaka cantonment. 4. Title of the study:.A comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics amongst the patient attending to the MDC Dhaka. 5. Duration: 1 year 6. Total cost: NA 7. Funding Agency (IF Applicable): NA We agree to obtain approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee of MDC Dhaka for any changes involving the rights and welfare of subjects or any changes of the methodology before making any such changes. Abstract for Ethical Committee Title: A Comparative Study On Tissue Response Under The Ridge Lap And Modified Ridgelap Pontics. Background:. The pontic or an artificial tooth is the main component of a fixed partial denture. The pontic is defined as “the artificial tooth suspended from the abutment teeth. According to the glossary of prosthodontic terms a pontic is defined as “an artificial tooth on a fixed partial denture that replaces a missing natural tooth restores its functions, and usually fills the space previously occupied by the clinical crown.In this role, the pontic should restore function, provide esthetics and comfort, be biologically acceptable, permit xxii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED effective oral hygiene, and preserve underlying residual mucosa.There are various types of pontics used in fixed prosthodontics. According to shape the pontic can be divided into ridge lap, modified ridge lap, sanitary, modified sanitary, saddle, modified saddle, conical, bullet and heart shaped pontic. According to material a pontic may be classified in all metal, metal and porcelain, combination of metal and resin.The aim of this study is to observe tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontic and condition of interdental papilla under the connector of fixed partial denture and to evaluate periodontal status of the abutment teeth. Objectives: The study was designed to observe the tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontic Place of study: Department of Prosthodontics in Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Period of study: From 1 February 2021 to 31 January 2022 Sample selection: Patients come seeking treatment for their missing mandibular first molar teeth in the department of Prosthodontics, Military dental centre Dhaka will be taken. Results: 40 diagnosed mandibular 1st molar missing patients were included in this study. All these patients were evaluated under 2 parameters and those evaluation were described in tables. The parameters are the condition of mucous membrane and the condition of abutment tooth.In case of group A, 3 patients were found in grade I, 6 in grade II, 4 in grade III and 7 in grade IV whereas in group B 9 patients were in grade I, 7 were in grade II, 2 in grade III and 2 patients were found in grade IV, after 6 weeks. The chi-square test was done as the test of significance and the P value was >0.05 which was statistically not significant. After 12 weeks interpretation 3 patients were found in grade I, 5 in grade II, 7 in grade III and 5 were found in grade IV respectively in case of group A, whereas 10 patients were found in grade I, 4 were grade II, 4 were grade III and 2 patients were found in grade IV in case of group B. The chi-square test was done as the test of significance and the P value was <0.05 which was statistically significant. After 6 months interpretation in group A 2 patients were found in grade I, 5 were in grade II, 5 were in grade III and 8 were in grade IV respectively, whereas in group B grade I had 9 patients, grade II had 4 patients and there were 5 patients in grade III and 2 patients were grade IV respectively. The chi-square test was done as the test of significance and the p value was <0.05 which was statistically significant.. Research Ethics Initial Checklist Please Tick (√) the appropriate answer in relation to your proposed research 1 2 3 4 Are human participants required in this research? Will the research involve participants vulnerable or unable to give informed consent (e.g., children, inmates, adults with learning difficulties, physical or mental impairments)? Could any aspect of the research cause any harm, physical or psychosocial stress to participants or third parties beyond expectation in everyday life, or pose potential risks to the researcher(s)? Will the research collect confidential, protected or otherwise politically or culturally sensitive data (e.g., sexual behavior or preference, experience of violence or abuse, xxiii RESTRICTED Yes No √ √ √ √ RESTRICTED 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 mental health, ethnic status, religious belief)? Will the research involve collection of medical or biological data? Does the study involve invasive or intrusive procedures? Will material or financial inducements (other than reasonable expenses and compensation for time) be offered to participants? Could the research entail or lead to conflicts of interest (e.g., financial sources compromising the independence or objectivity of the research)? Could the image of this Institute, academic departments, research Centreor any other institute involved be negatively affected by this research? Could any aspect of the research produce information that could lead to criminal prosecution of the participants or others? Will you inform participants that their participation is voluntary and their right to refuse to participate or to withdraw from the study? Will signed consent/verbal consent be required from study subjects? Will the subjects be informed about nature and purpose of the study, procedures including alternatives, physical risks, benefits from the study? Will precautions be taken to protect anonymity of the subjects? √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Declaration by the Applicant I hereby certify that the above-mentioned statements are true, I have read and understood the regulation of the Ethical Committee on the approval of research proposal and will act in conformity with the regulation. I declare that the details above reflect accurately my research proposal. I understand that if granted, this approval will apply to the current research protocol and timeframe. …………………………………. Signature of Applicant Date: ……………… Declaration by the Supervisor (if applicable) I have read this application. I am satisfied that it is in line with the criteria set out by the Institutional Ethical Committee. …………………………………….. Supervisor’s Signature Date: ………………… Date: To The Supervisor, Department of Prosthodontics. Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantonment. xxiv RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Subject:Application for the approval of the dissertation protocol for Grading in Prosthodontics Sir, With due respect, I humbly state that I am Major Nadia Jahan a trainee in grading at the department of Prosthodontics. As a requirement of grading examination, dissertation work has to be undertaken. After reviewing available literatures and consultation with the honorable teachers, I have decided to do my dissertation work on a comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics.I therefore, hope that you would be kind enough to approve my dissertation protocol enclosed herewith and supervise me in my dissertation work. Yours Obediently, ……………………………………… Major Nadia Jahan Trainee Grading in Prosthodontics Department of Prosthodontics Military Dental Centre Dhaka,Dhaka Cantonment. Date: To The President, Ethical Committee Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantonment Through Supervisor, Department of Prosthodontics. xxv RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Subject: Application for ethical clearance of the dissertation protocol titled a comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics Sir, With due respect and humble submission, I would like to state that I am a grading trainee (Prosthodontics,MDC, Dhaka). As part of the training, I would like to perform my dissertation on a comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics under supervision of Col Md Tariquzzaman,FCPS. Therefore, I hope that you would kindly approve my dissertation by giving me the ethical clearance to go ahead with my study. I shall be grateful and obliged thereby. Yours Obediently, ……………………………………… Major Nadia Jahan Trainee Grading in prosthodontics Department of Prosthodontics. Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantonment. Enclosures: a) Dissertation protocol b) Data collection sheet c) Consent form Board of Approval Military Dental Centre Dhaka We the members of Institutional Ethical Committee certify that we have carefully read and recommended to the Department of Prosthodontics, MDC, Dhaka for approval of this proposal of Dissertation entitled A comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics xxvi RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Submitted by Major Nadia Jahan partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Grading in Prosthodontics President: BRIG GEN MD ABDUR RAB, FCPS Commandant …………………………… (Signature) Members: 1. Head. Dept. of Conservative Dentistry &Endodontics. 2. Head Dept. of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. …………………………… (Signature) ………………………….. (Signature) 3. Head Dept. of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopedics. ………………………….. (Signature) 4. Head Dept. of Prosthodontics …………………………… (Signature) 5. Religious Teacher of unit ………………………….. (Signature) Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Dhaka Cantt To Major Nadia Jahan Trainee xxvii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Grading in prosthodontics Department of Prosthodontics. Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka Cantonment. Your research protocol titled “a comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics” as been approved by the ethical committee of Military Dental Centre Dhaka, Dhaka cantonment for further procedure. Thanking you. ……………………………….. Col Md Tariquzzaman,D-prostho,FCPS Classified Specialist in Prosthodontics. Military Dental Centre Dhaka. Dhaka Cantt. Procedure for Maintaining Confidentiality All information regarding participants will be treated with the utmost confidentiality, and will not be disclosed to anyone else without prior consent of, and that their anonymity will be respected at all times unless otherwise determined by law. Proper safety method will be followed during oral examination and interview privacy will be maintained. An ID number will be given to each of the patient which will be used during followup visits. xxviii RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Research data will be coded. All data will be coded using a system known only to the researcher to preserve the identity of the participant and will nevertheless allow the participant access to her/his data at any time during the research process should this be requested. Use of random identity numbers on participants’ data with a separate name/number list. Data will be stored in a locked cabinet. Only research personnel will be allowed to access the data. Agreement to release of personal information should be sought only when the participant is properly informed about possible harms that may occur. Confidential information provided by research participants, employees, clients or others must be treated as confidential even if there is no legal protection or privilege. The obligation to maintain confidentiality extends to members of the research or training teams and collaborating organizations who have access to the information. To ensure that access to confidential information is restricted, the principal researcher is responsible for ensuring that researchers, administrators and other relevant parties adequately trained and instructed to take the steps necessary to protect confidentiality. CHECKLIST OF DOCUMENTS FOR ETHICAL COMMITTEE Name of Applicant: Major Nadia Jahan Title of Study A comparative study on tissue response under the ridge lap and modified ridgelap pontics: Documents Enclosed xxix RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Yes Application for Ethical Clearance √ Abstract for Ethical Committee √ Project Proposal/ Dissertation Protocol √ Participant Information Sheet √ Participant Consent Form √ Patient’s data collection sheet √ Procedure for maintaining confidentiality √ Application to the President of Ethical Committee, MDC Dhaka for ethical clearance √ Application to the Supervisor √ Figures xxx RESTRICTED No RESTRICTED Figures-III: Dental spoon excavator Figures-IV: Dental mirror xxxi RESTRICTED RESTRICTED Figures-V: Dental periodontal probe Figures-VI: Dental caries probe xxxii RESTRICTED