In this case, there's a dispute over the registration of a piece of land in Occidental
Mindoro, Philippines. Here's a summary of the key points:
Background:



Teodoro Abistado filed a petition for the registration of a 648-square meter land
under Presidential Decree No. 1529.
While the petition was ongoing, Teodoro Abistado passed away, and his heirs
(represented by their aunt Josefa Abistado) were substituted as applicants.
The trial court initially dismissed the petition, stating that it lacked jurisdiction
because the notice of the initial hearing was not published in a newspaper of
general circulation as required by law.
Court of Appeals Ruling:


The Court of Appeals disagreed with the trial court, stating that publication in the
Official Gazette alone was enough to confer jurisdiction.
They also argued that the failure to publish in a newspaper did not prejudice
anyone's rights since other requirements like mailing and posting notices were
fulfilled.
Supreme Court Decision:






The Supreme Court, however, ruled in favor of the petitioner (the Director of
Lands) and disagreed with the Court of Appeals.
They emphasized that the law uses the term "shall" when it comes to publication,
indicating that it's a mandatory requirement.
The Court clarified that land registration is an "in rem" proceeding, meaning it
affects everyone's rights in the property, and publication is essential for
constructive notice to all parties.
While the law required publication in the Official Gazette, it also mandated
publication in a newspaper of general circulation, which was equally important
for due process.
The Court recognized that the Official Gazette's circulation was limited and often
delayed, making newspaper publication more effective in reaching interested
parties.
Ultimately, the failure to comply with the mandatory publication requirement
meant that the land registration application had to be dismissed without
prejudice, allowing the applicants to reapply in the future after meeting all legal
requirements.
In summary, the Supreme Court upheld the importance of newspaper publication as a
mandatory requirement for land registration, emphasizing due process and the need to
notify all interested parties. Therefore, the Court of Appeals' decision was reversed, and
the land registration application was dismissed, allowing for possible reapplication in
the future.