Modern Business Statistics (6e) Essentials of Modern Business Statistics (7e) Anderson, Sweeney, Williams, Camm, Cochran © 2018 Cengage Learning © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 1 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Chapter 12 Tests of Goodness of Fit, Independence, and Multiple Proportions Goodness of Fit Test Test of Independence Testing For Equality of Three or More Population Proportions © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 2 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Tests of Goodness of Fit, Independence, and Multiple Proportions In this chapter we introduce three additional hypothesis-testing procedures. The test statistic and the distribution used are based on the chisquare (χ²) distribution. In all cases, the data are categorical. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 3 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution, Part 1 1. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: The population follows a multinomial distribution with specified probabilities for each of the k categories Ha: The population does not follow a multinomial distribution with specified probabilities for each of the k categories © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 4 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution, Part 2 2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fi , for each of the k categories. 3. Assuming H0 is true, compute the expected frequency, e i , in each category by multiplying the category probability by the sample size. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 5 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution, Part 3 4. Compute the value of the test statistic. where: f i = observed frequency for category i e i = expected frequency for category i k = number of categories Note: The test statistic has a chi-square distribution with k – 1 df provided that the expected frequencies are 5 or more for all categories. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 6 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Goodness of Fit Test: Multinomial Probability Distribution, Part 4 5. Rejection rule: Where α is the significance level and there are k - 1 degrees of freedom. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 7 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 1 Example: Scott Marketing Research Market share study conducted by Scott Marketing research has identified that the market for a product X is shared by three companies: A, B and C. Company C plans to introduce new and improved product to replace its current entry in the market. It wants Scott Marketing research to determine whether the new product will alter the market share for the three companies. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 8 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 2 Example: Scott Marketing Research Using the historical market shares, we have a multinomial probability distribution with p A = .30, p B = .50, p C = .20. Scott Marketing research conducts a sample study using a consumer panel of 200 customers. A hypothesis test can be used to determine whether the new product of company C is likely to change the historical market shares for the three companies. We will use an α = .05 level of significance. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 9 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 3 Example: Scott Marketing Research Hypotheses H0: p A =.30, p B = .50, p C = .20 Ha: The probabilities are not p A =.30, p B = .50, p C = .20 where: p A = probability a customer purchases the company A product p B = probability a customer purchases the company B product p C = probability a customer purchases the company C product © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 10 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 4 Example: Scott Marketing Research Expected Frequencies Category Company A Company B Company C Total Expected Frequency 200 (.30) 60 200 (.50) 100 200 (.20) = 40 200 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 11 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 5 Example: Scott Marketing Research Observed Frequencies (from the sample study) Category Company A Company B Company C Total Observed frequency 48 98 51 200 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 12 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 6 Example: Scott Marketing Research Test Statistic © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 13 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 7 Example: Scott Marketing Research Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 14 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 8 Example: Scott Marketing Research Conclusion Using the Critical Value Approach With α = .05 and 2 degrees of freedom, the critical value for the test statistic is χ² = 5.991. Rejection rule © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 15 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 9 Example: Scott Marketing Research Bar chart of market shares by company before and after the new product for company C © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 16 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multinomial Distribution Goodness of Fit Test, Part 10 Example: Scott Marketing Research - Excel Worksheet Customer Preference 1 B 2 A 3 C 5 C 6 A 7 A 8 A 9 C 10 A 11 C 12 B 13 C 14 A 199 C 200 C Categories Obs. Frequency A 48 B 98 C 54 Total 200 Empty cell Hyp. Probability Exp. Frequency 0.3 =D10*$E$7 0.5 =D11*$E$7 0.2 P-value Hyp. Probability Exp. Frequency =D12*$E$7 0.3 60 =CHISQ.TEST(E4:E6,E10:E12) 0.5 100 0.2 40 P-value 0.0255 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 17 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 1 1. Set up the null and alternative hypotheses. H0: The two categorical variables are independent Ha: The two categorical variables are not independent 2. Select a random sample and record the observed frequency, fij , for each cell of the contingency table. 3. Compute the expected frequency, eij , for each cell. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 18 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 2 4. Compute the test statistic. 5. Determine the rejection rule. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 19 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 3 Example: Beer Industry Association Beer Industry Association conducts a survey to determine the preferences of beer drinkers for light, regular and dark beers. It wants to determine if preference for the beer is independent of the gender. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 20 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 4 Example: Beer Industry Association A sample of 200 beer drinkers is taken. The sample result is summarised in the following table. Observed frequencies Beer Preference Gender: Male Gender: Female Total Light 51 39 90 Regular 56 21 77 Dark 25 8 33 Total 132 68 200 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 21 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 5 Example: Beer Industry Association Hypotheses H0: Beer preference is independent of gender Ha: Beer preference is not independent of gender © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 22 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 6 Example: Beer Industry Association Expected frequencies Beer Preference Gender: Male Gender: Female Total Light 59.4 30.6 90 Regular 50.82 26.18 77 Dark 21.78 11.22 33 Total 132 68 200 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 23 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 7 Example: Beer Industry Association Rejection Rule © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 24 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 8 Example: Beer Industry Association Computation of Chi-square test statistic Beer Preference Gender Observed frequency F subscript Ij Expected frequency E subscript I j Light Male 51 59.4 -8.4 70.56 1.19 Light Female 39 30.6 8.4 70.56 2.31 Regular Male 56 50.82 5.18 26.83 .53 Regular Female 21 26.18 -5.18 26.83 1.02 Dark Male 25 21.78 3.22 10.37 .48 Dark Female 8 11.22 -3.22 10.37 .92 Empty cell Total 200 200 Empty cell Empty cell Chi squared equals 6.45 Difference Left parenthesis f subscript I j baseline minus e subscript I j baseline right parenthesis Squared difference Left parenthesis f subscript I j baseline minus e subscript I j baseline right parenthesis squared Squared difference / Expected frequency © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 25 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 9 Example: Beer Industry Association Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 26 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 10 Example: Beer Industry Association Conclusion Using the Critical Value Approach We reject, at the .05 level of significance, the assumption that the beer preference is independent of the gender of the beer drinker. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 27 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 11 Example: Beer Industry Association Bar Chart comparison of Beer preference by Gender © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 28 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Test of Independence, Part 12 Example: Beer Industry Association - Excel Worksheet Beer Drinker Preference Gender Count of Beer Drinker Preference Gende r Male Female Total 1 Regular Male Light 51 39 90 Regular 56 21 77 2 Light 3 Regular Female Dark 25 8 33 Male Total 132 68 200 4 Regular Male 5 Regular Female 6 Regular Male 7 Dark Male 8 Dark Male 9 Dark Male 10 Light Female 11 Light Male 12 Dark Female 13 Regular Female 14 Regular 15 Light 16 Regular Male 199 Light Male 200 Light Male Preference Gender Male Gender Female Light =(H5*F$8)/H$8 =(H5*G$8)/H$8 Regular =(H6*F$8)/H$8 =(H6*G$8)/H$8 Dark =(H7*F$8)/H$8 =(H7*G$8)/H$8 Empty cell Empty cell =CHISQ.TEST(E4:E6,E10:E12) Preference Gender Male Gender Female Male Light 59.40 30.60 Male Regular 50.82 26.18 Dark 21.78 11.22 Empty cell Empty cell 0.0398 (circled) © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 29 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing for Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 1 Using the notation p1 = population proportion for population 1 p2 = population proportion for population 2 p k = population proportion for population k The hypotheses for the equality of population proportions for k > 3 populations are as follows: H0: p1 = p2 = . . . = p k Ha: Not all population proportions are equal © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 30 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 2 If H0 cannot be rejected, we cannot detect a difference among the k population proportions. If H0 can be rejected, we can conclude that not all k population proportions are equal. Further analyses can be done to conclude which population proportions are significantly different from others. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 31 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 3 Example: Customer loyalty for automobiles Suppose in a particular study we want to compare the customer loyalty for three automobiles: Chevrolet Impala, Ford Fusion and Honda Accord. p1 = population proportion for Chevrolet Impala p2 = population proportion for Ford Fusion p3 = population proportion for Honda Accord © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 32 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 4 Example: Customer loyalty for automobiles We begin by taking a sample of owners from each of the three populations. Each sample contains categorical data indicating whether the respondents are likely or not likely to repurchase the automobile. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 33 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 5 Example: Customer loyalty for automobiles Observed frequencies (Sample results) Likely to Repurchase Chevrolet Impala Ford Fusion Honda Accord Total Yes 69 120 123 312 No 56 80 52 188 Total 125 200 175 500 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 34 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 6 Next, we determine the expected frequencies under the assumption H0 is correct Expected Frequencies under the Assumption H0 is True If a significant difference exists between the observed and expected frequencies, H0 can be rejected. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 35 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 7 Example: Customer loyalty for automobiles Expected frequencies (Computed) Likely to Repurchase Chevrolet Impala Ford Fusion Honda Accord Total Yes 78 124.8 109.2 312 No 47 75.2 65.8 188 Total 125 200 175 500 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 36 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 8 Next, compute the value of the chi-square test statistic. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 37 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 9 Computation of the Chi-Square Test Statistic. Likely to repurchase Automobile owner Observed frequency F subscript I j Expected frequency E subscript Ij Difference Left parenthesis f subscript I j baseline minus e subscript I j baseline right parenthesis Squared difference Left parenthesis f subscript I j baseline minus e subscript I j baseline right parenthesis squared Yes Impala 69 78.0 -9.0 81.00 1.04 Yes Fusion 120 124.8 -4.8 23.04 0.18 Yes Accord 123 109.2 13.8 190.44 1.74 No Impala 56 47.0 9.0 81.00 1.72 No Fusion 80 75.2 4.8 23.04 0.31 No Accord 52 65.8 Negative 13.8 190.44 2.89 Empty cell Empty cell 500 500 Empty cell Empty cell Chi squared equals 7.89 Squared difference / Expected frequency © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 38 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 10 Rejection Rule © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 39 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 11 Example: Customer loyalty for automobiles Conclusion Using the p-Value Approach © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 40 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 12 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 41 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 13 Excel Worksheets Owner Automobile Likely Repurchase 1 Chevrolet Impala Yes 2 Chevrolet Impala 3 4 Count of Owner Likely Repurchase Automobile Chevrolet Impala Ford Fusion Honda Accord Total Yes Yes 69 120 123 312 Chevrolet Impala No No 56 80 52 188 Chevrolet Impala Yes Total 125 200 175 500 5 Chevrolet Impala Yes 6 Chevrolet Impala Yes 7 Chevrolet Impala Yes Likely Repurchase Automobile Chevrolet Impala Automobile Ford Fusion Automobile Honda Accord =(15*F7)/17 =(15*G7)/17 =(15*H7)/17 8 Chevrolet Impala Yes Yes 9 Chevrolet Impala No No =(16*F7)/17 =(16*G7)/17 =(16*H7)/17 10 Chevrolet Impala Yes Empty cell P-value =CHISQ.TEST(F5:H6,F12:H13) Empty cell 11 Chevrolet Impala Yes 12 Chevrolet Impala No Likely Repurchase Automobile Chevrolet Impala Automobile Ford Fusion Automobile Honda Accord 13 Chevrolet Impala Yes 14 Chevrolet Impala No Yes 78 124.8 109.2 47 75.2 65.8 P-value 0.0193 Empty cell 15 Chevrolet Impala No No 499 Chevrolet Impala No Empty cell 500 Chevrolet Impala No © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 42 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Testing the Equality of Population Proportions for Three or More Populations, Part 14 We have concluded that the population proportions for the three populations of automobile owners are not equal. To identify where the differences between population proportions exist, we will rely on a multiple comparisons procedure. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 43 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multiple Comparisons Procedure, Part 1 We begin by computing the three sample proportions. We will use a multiple comparison procedure known as the Marascuillo procedure. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 44 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multiple Comparisons Procedure, Part 2 Marascuillo Procedure We compute the absolute value of the pairwise difference between sample proportions. © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 45 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multiple Comparisons Procedure, Part 3 Critical Values for the Marascuillo Pairwise Comparison For each pairwise comparison compute a critical value as follows: © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 46 Modern Business Statistics (6e) Multiple Comparisons Procedure, Part 4 Pairwise Comparison Tests Pairwise Comparison Absolute value of p overbar subscript i minus p overbar subscript j C V subscript i j Significant if absolute value of p overbar subscript i minus p overbar subscript j is Greater than C V subscript i j Chevrolet Impala and Ford Fusion .0480 .1380 Not significant Chevrolet Impala and Honda Accord .1509 .1379 Significant Ford Fusion and Honda Accord .1029 .1198 Not significant © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 47 Modern Business Statistics (6e) End of Chapter 12 © 2018 Cengage Learning. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. 48