GEN 331: PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND
TESTING
CA-1 REPORT
Modular and Portable
Agricultural Processing
SUBMITTED BY:
SUBMITTED TO:
JAZIM NIYAZ (12106238)
DR. ROHIT SHARMA
ABSTRACT
The agriculture sector has traditionally faced challenges related to postharvest processing, storage, and transportation, leading to substantial
losses both in terms of produce quality and economic value.
This report introduces the concept of a Modular and Portable Agricultural
Processing Unit, an innovative solution designed to address these
challenges directly at or near the point of harvest.
Comprising key modules, such as a solar-powered dehydrator, a
mechanical sorting mechanism, and a compact cold storage compartment,
this unit offers multifunctional processing capabilities to farmers.
By leveraging renewable energy sources, it seeks not only to enhance the
sustainability of agricultural processes but also to reduce operational costs.
The modular nature of the unit ensures flexibility, scalability, and ease of
maintenance.
Preliminary findings indicate potential benefits including reduced
transportation costs, increased produce quality, and a decrease in postharvest losses. Through this report, we further delve into the design,
methodology, and implications of such a system, hoping to pave the way for
a sustainable and efficient agricultural future.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Title
COVER PAGE
ABSTRACT
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE
REVIEW
&
REFERENCE
METHODOLOGY
FINDINGS
CONCEPTUALIZA
TION
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
3
Page
1
2
3
4
6
8
10
13
19
21
INTRODUCTION
Background
Agriculture, as one of the oldest and most vital industries, has always been
at the epicenter of human survival and progress. With global populations
burgeoning and arable land becoming more scarce, maximizing the yield and
quality of agricultural produce has never been more paramount. However,
despite significant advancements in the farming sector, post-harvest
processes often remain outdated, inefficient, or inaccessible to many smallscale farmers. These inefficiencies lead to substantial crop loss, diminished
product quality, and economic setbacks.
Problem Statement
Farmers often face the challenge of quickly and efficiently processing their
crops immediately after harvest to ensure freshness and minimize losses.
This task is made even more daunting due to factors like long distances to
processing facilities, lack of access to modern processing equipment, and the
perishable nature of most agricultural products. There's a growing demand
for solutions that can bridge this gap, offering both efficiency and
accessibility.
4
Objective of the Report
The aim of this report is to conceptualize, design, and evaluate the feasibility
of a modular and portable agricultural processing unit that can be easily
transported to various farming locations. This unit seeks to integrate several
innovative features including a solar-powered dehydrator for drying crops, a
mechanical sorting mechanism for grading produce, and a compact cold
storage compartment.
Significance of the Report:
• Introducing a mobile processing unit in the agricultural industry has
the potential to:
• Reduce post-harvest losses, ensuring farmers receive better returns on
their efforts.
• Improve the quality of the processed produce by minimizing the time
between harvest and processing.
• Empower small-scale farmers by providing them with access to
modern processing technologies, thereby leveling the playing field.
• Promote sustainability through the use of renewable energy sources,
such as solar power, which would decrease the carbon footprint
associated with agricultural processing.
Scope of the Report:
In the ensuing sections, this report will delve deep into literature related to
agricultural processing, evaluate existing solutions, detail the methodology
behind designing the proposed unit, and present findings based on
simulations and potential field trials. Subsequent discussions will interpret
these findings, weighing the advantages against challenges, and culminating
in a conclusion on the viability and potential impact of the modular and
portable agricultural processing unit.
5
LITERATURE REVIEW & REFERENCE
S.
Author(s)
No.
Title of the Study Objectives/Research
Questions
1.
S. Mekhilef et The application
of
solar
al., 2012
technologies for
sustainable
development of
agricultural
sector
2.
Jiahui Zheng et
al,
Resources,
Conservation and
Recycling 2022
3.
4.
5.
Key
Findings
To understand the
effectiveness of solardriven
agricultural
units
75%
of
farmers
in
distant rural
areas found
solar
units
increased
crop
yield
quality
To review the current Identified
technologies
in three major
mechanical sorting
trends: NIR,
sensor-based,
and manualassisted
sorting
Efficient
Recognition and
Automatic Sorting
Technology
of
Waste
Textiles
Based on Online
Near
infrared
Spectroscopy
Eben V. Fodor, The Solar Food Materials and Know Different
(2007)
Dryer (Book)
how to build a food modular solar
dehydrator
dehydrators
Institute
of Electrification
Agricultural
Engineering
and
Electrification
(2019), Matteo
Beligoj et al
Patel, 2021
Cold
Storage
Solutions
for
Small-scale
Farmers
Electrification
Agricultural
Machinery
of
To
explore
affordable
and
effective cold storage
solutions
6
-
Mobile cold
storage units
enhanced
produce
lifespan by
60% on
average
Relevance to
Current
project
Highlights the
effectiveness
of
solar
technology in
agriculture
Offers insights
into
the
potential
technologies
that can be
incorporated
Inspiration and
Adaptable
dehydrator
designs
Development
of
moving
parts
in
prototype
Emphasizes
the
significance of
mobile
cold
storage for our
project
METHODOLOGY
1. Objective Definition
Before commencing with this report, a clear set of objectives was outlined:
• Understanding the current challenges farmers face regarding crop processing.
• Identifying the potential technologies and mechanisms suitable for
modularization and portability.
• Analyzing the feasibility and implications of integrating different
functionalities (dehydration, sorting, cold storage) within one compact unit.
2. Source Identification
To ensure the authenticity and reliability of the information, we identified credible
online sources including:
•
•
•
•
•
Agricultural research databases
Peer-reviewed journal articles
Government agricultural departments and publications
Industry reports from agricultural machinery manufacturers
Publications from agricultural NGOs and organizations
7
3. Keyword Searches
Keyword search strings were crafted to find relevant information. Some examples
include:
“Portable agricultural processing systems”
“Solar-powered crop dehydrators”
“Mechanical sorting mechanisms in agriculture”
“Compact cold storage solutions for crops”
4. Data Compilation
From the gathered articles, reports, and journals, data was extracted and compiled
into:
•
•
•
•
Existing portable processing units and their functionalities
Technologies available for solar-powered dehydration
Mechanical sorting mechanisms and their efficiencies
Advancements in compact cold storage technologies
8
5. Analysis
This stage involved synthesizing the data and information collected. An analytical
approach was used to:
• Identify gaps in current portable processing solutions
• Compare the efficiencies of different drying, sorting, and storage mechanisms
• Understand the energy requirements, especially in terms of solar power
capabilities
• Evaluate the feasibility of integrating multiple functions into one unit,
considering factors like weight, power consumption, and space.
6. Model Conceptualization
Based on the analysis, a conceptual model of the modular and portable agricultural
processing unit was developed, detailing the potential components, their
interconnections, and operational dynamics.
8. Future Considerations
The methodology also involves charting out potential steps for future, including:
• Engaging in physical surveys and field tests
• Collaborating with agricultural technology experts for refined insights
• Prototyping and iterative testing of the conceptual model.
9
FINDINGS
This report into creating a modular and portable agricultural processing unit yielded
a set of distinct findings, each anchored in the realm of real-world applications and
dynamics. Here's a detailed breakdown:
1. Need for Portable Processing Units
Global Trend: With increasing fragmentation of agricultural lands, especially in
regions like Asia and Africa, there’s a rise in smaller farm holdings. Smaller farm
owners often lack the resources for standalone processing units. A portable and
shared model can be more economically viable for them.
Value Addition: Immediate post-harvest processing, particularly for perishable
crops, can reduce post-harvest losses, which are estimated at around 30% globally,
according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). This not only ensures
better economic returns for farmers but also contributes to food security.
2. Solar-Powered Dehydration
Efficiency: Studies from the International Journal of Renewable Energy Research
suggest that solar dehydration can reduce moisture content in crops like fruits and
vegetables by up to 90% in favorable sunny conditions.
Variability: The efficiency of solar dehydration varies based on geographical
location and climatic conditions. For instance, areas closer to the equator with longer
daylight hours can benefit more.
10
3. Mechanical Sorting Mechanisms
Accuracy: As per the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers,
contemporary mechanical sorting technologies can achieve up to 95% accuracy in
grading produce based on size and quality.
Adaptability: Modern sorting mechanisms, equipped with sensors, are versatile and
can be adapted to different types of crops. This adaptability, however, sometimes
requires recalibration or change of certain components.
4. Compact Cold Storage
Energy Consumption: According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
maintaining cold storage requires a significant amount of energy. Even compact
units can have high power demands.
Preservation Efficiency: Effective cold storage can extend the shelf life of many
agricultural products. For instance, tomatoes, which might last only a week at
ambient temperature, can last up to three weeks when stored at optimal refrigerated
conditions.
11
5. Integration of Multiple Systems
Space Efficiency: Combining multiple functionalities within a single unit can lead
to space constraints. However, a study from the Journal of Agricultural Machinery
and Biosystems Engineering suggests that a well-designed layout can utilize up to
90% of the available space effectively.
Energy Considerations: Integrating solar-powered dehydration with cold storage
might present energy allocation challenges. While the former is daylight-dependent,
the latter requires a consistent energy source, potentially necessitating a battery
backup or secondary power source.
6. User-Friendliness and Training
Reports from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) emphasize
the importance of user-friendly interfaces for any agricultural machinery. Simpler
interfaces can reduce the learning curve and enhance adoption rates among farmers.
Online training modules and digital manuals, as a complementary aspect of the unit,
can facilitate better and broader usage.
7. Economic Implications
The upfront cost of a multifunctional processing unit might be high. However,
reports from the World Bank suggest that shared models or co-op owned models can
distribute the cost among multiple stakeholders, making it more affordable. The
return on investment can be realized faster for farmers with higher yield crops or
those growing high-value crops. Direct savings from reduced post-harvest losses,
coupled with value addition from processed goods, can contribute to better economic
returns.
12
CONCEPTUALIZATION
1. Design Aesthetics
The unit should be sleek and functional with a neutral color (like green or beige)
reflecting its agricultural purpose. Use lightweight but durable materials such as
aluminum and hard plastics for the body.
2. Solar-powered dehydrator
Construction:
• Solar Panels: Use foldable monocrystalline panels due to their high
efficiency and portability. Attach them to the top of the unit using hinges.
• Dehydration Chambers: Aluminum or stainless steel mesh trays stacked
vertically. Ensure they can slide in and out for easy loading and unloading.
• Exhaust Fans: Place them at the sides for expelling humid air. Ensure they're
protected by grills to prevent foreign objects from entering.
Functionality:
Solar energy charges a battery during daylight. The stored energy powers fans that
pull in air, which then flows around the crops on the mesh trays, drying them and
pushing out the moist air.
13
3. Mechanical sorting mechanism
Construction:
• Conveyor System: Use a lightweight rubber conveyor belt. Attach it to
aluminum rollers at both ends.
• Sensors: Infrared sensors are great for size differentiation. Optical sensors
can help with color differentiation. These should be placed overhead,
spanning the width of the conveyor.
• Sorting Gates: Small gates that can be triggered to open or close based on
sensor readings, guiding crops into specific bins.
Functionality:
Produce moves along the conveyor, passing under the sensors. Based on readings,
the sorting gates guide the produce into designated bins.
4. Compact cold storage
Construction:
• Insulated Walls: Use vacuum-insulated panels for maximum efficiency with
minimum thickness.
• Cooling System: A compact vapor-compression refrigeration unit, run by
battery power (charged by solar panels).
• Shelves: Stainless steel racks for easy cleaning and longevity.
14
Functionality:
The refrigeration unit maintains a low temperature, ensuring the produce stays fresh.
It operates intermittently to save power, relying on the insulation to maintain low
temperatures.
5. Portability features
Construction:
• Structure: A lightweight aluminum frame that holds all modules together.
This ensures strength without adding much weight
.
• Wheels: Heavy-duty rubber wheels, preferably airless to avoid punctures,
with locking mechanisms for stability during operation.
• Handles and Grips: Attach retractable handles on both ends to aid with
mobility.
Functionality:
Once processing is done, solar panels fold in, handles are retracted, and the unit can
be rolled to its next location.
15
6. Interactivity
Construction:
• Control Panel: Place a waterproof touch screen on one side of the unit. It
should provide control over all processes and display battery levels, drying
progress, storage temperature, etc.
• Emergency Stop Button: Always a crucial safety feature. Place it
prominently on the side.
Functionality:
Farmers interact with the unit through the control panel. They can set drying times,
check battery levels, adjust storage temperatures, etc.
Visual Overview:
Imagine a rectangular unit on wheels, similar to a large portable generator. On top,
when expanded, you see sleek solar panels. On the side, a touchscreen panel with a
large red emergency stop button beneath. The front side hosts the conveyor intake,
the backside has the exhaust fans for the dehydrator, and a side door gives access to
the cold storage.
To make it a reality, collaboration with design and engineering experts would be
necessary. Prototyping and testing would further refine the design and enhance
functionality
16
COSTING:
The costs for high fidelity models and low fidelity prototypes vary widely depending
on several factors. Below is a broad estimate based on general considerations:
High Fidelity Model
A high fidelity model is a detailed and interactive representation of the end product.
It looks and operates very closely to the final product. This can be either a digital
model (using software) or a physical prototype.
Factors affecting cost:
1. Materials: If it's a physical prototype, high-quality materials can be expensive.
2. Labor: Expertise in design and prototyping will be required, especially for
intricate mechanisms like the mechanical sorting system.
3. Technology: Integration of actual sensors, solar panels, and refrigeration
elements.
4. Testing: Functionality tests to ensure the model works as intended.
Estimated Cost Range: Depending on the complexity and scale, creating a high
fidelity model for a Modular and Portable Agricultural Processing Unit can range
from $10,000 to $100,000 or more.
17
Low Fidelity Prototype
A low fidelity prototype is a simpler, often non-functional representation of the end
product. This can be sketched on paper, made from basic materials like cardboard,
or represented digitally as wireframes.
Factors affecting cost:
1. Materials: Generally inexpensive, like paper, cardboard, or basic software for
digital wireframes.
2. Labor: Less expertise is needed as compared to high fidelity models.
3. Time: Low fidelity prototypes are faster to create.
Estimated Cost Range: For such a system, it might range from $100 to $2,000,
especially if you're simply using materials like cardboard and basic design software.
SIMULATION
18
DISCUSSION
The findings gleaned from our extensive online research have illuminated several
crucial aspects related to the design, deployment, and efficiency of a modular and
portable agricultural processing unit. This discussion section delves deeper into the
implications of these findings, contextualizing them within the broader scope of
agricultural dynamics and technology integration.
1. Addressing the Fragmentation of Agricultural Lands:
The increasing fragmentation of agricultural lands, notably in regions with booming
populations, has led to smaller farm holdings. These smaller farms often cannot
afford large-scale processing infrastructure. Thus, the introduction of a portable and
modular processing unit would allow these farmers to benefit from advanced postharvest processing. Not only does this decentralize the processing, but it also reduces
the need for transport logistics to centralized units.
2. Harnessing Solar Power:
Solar-powered dehydration has shown considerable efficiency in reducing moisture
content, particularly in sunny conditions. However, the dependence on sunlight
underscores the need to consider geographic and seasonal factors. Areas with
prolonged rainy seasons or extended cloud cover may not harness this technology's
full potential. That said, with advancements in solar panel efficiency and energy
storage solutions, there's an increasing possibility of making this solution viable for
a broader range of locales.
3. Adaptable Mechanical Sorting:
The adaptability of modern mechanical sorters to handle different crop types is a
significant advantage, as it allows the processing unit to serve diverse agricultural
needs. The high accuracy rates reported indicate that farmers can expect consistent
grading quality. However, the nuances in different crops might require calibration
or modular changes in the sorting mechanisms, emphasizing the need for user
training.
4. Energy Considerations in Compact Cold Storage:
While cold storage offers extended shelf life, its energy demands are considerable.
Balancing this with solar-powered dehydration presents a challenge. For instance,
during peak dehydration times, when sunlight is optimal, the energy demand for cold
19
storage might also peak due to external heat. This overlap underscores the need for
a robust energy storage mechanism, possibly with supplemental energy sources.
5. Integration Challenges:
Merging dehydration, sorting, and cold storage into a singular unit presents design
and operational challenges. Optimizing space while ensuring each component
operates efficiently requires meticulous design considerations. The energy demands
of each module need careful calibration to ensure one doesn't overshadow or hamper
the others.
6. Usability and Economic Aspects:
While technology integration offers multiple functionalities, the usability for
farmers, many of whom might not be tech-savvy, becomes paramount. Simplified
interfaces and comprehensive training can expedite the adoption rate. Economically,
the initial cost might be a barrier for individual small-scale farmers. However,
collaborative ownership models, like community-owned or co-op owned systems,
can distribute costs and offer shared benefits.
7. The Bigger Picture:
In the broader scheme, the modular and portable agricultural processing unit holds
the potential to revolutionize small-scale farming. By reducing post-harvest losses,
offering value addition at the farm gate, and allowing farmers to tap into processed
goods markets, these units can uplift agricultural economies. They can also play a
role in achieving global sustainability targets by reducing food waste.
While the modular and portable agricultural processing unit is imbued with
considerable potential, its design, deployment, and scaling require a careful balance
of technology, user needs, and economic considerations. The real-world application
of such units would be a testament to agricultural innovation tailored for
contemporary challenges and future growth.
20
CONCLUSION
The modern agricultural landscape is rapidly evolving, driven by technological
advancements, shifting landholding patterns, and an ever-growing demand for
efficient post-harvest processing. Our extensive research into the feasibility and
dynamics of a modular and portable agricultural processing unit underscores its
potential to be a game-changer in this domain.
Such a unit, designed with solar-powered dehydration, adaptable mechanical sorting,
and compact cold storage, offers a holistic solution to many of the challenges faced
by small-scale farmers. By enabling immediate post-harvest processing, it promises
to significantly reduce food wastage, enhance value addition, and subsequently
increase farmers' economic returns.
However, the integration of these technologies into a singular, cohesive unit requires
meticulous design considerations and a deep understanding of user needs. Factors
like geographical location, crop type, and energy demands play pivotal roles in
shaping its efficiency and practicality.
Furthermore, the financial aspect cannot be sidelined. While the initial investment
might appear daunting, innovative ownership and financing models, like cooperative or community ownership, can help bridge this gap, ensuring that the unit
is accessible even to small-scale farmers.
In sum, the modular and portable agricultural processing unit is not just an
embodiment of technological innovation, but also a reflection of a future-oriented
agricultural paradigm. It captures the essence of sustainable and efficient farming,
poised to play a significant role in the future of agriculture. As we move forward,
continuous iterations, feedback from on-ground implementations, and adaptability
will be key to realizing its full potential and ensuring its widespread adoption.
.
21