Energy management of fuel cell electric vehicle with hydrid tanks Alexandre Ravey1,3 , Sebastien Faivre1,3 , Charles Higel1,2,3 , Fabien Harel2,3 , and Abdesslem Djerdir1,3 1 2 IRTES, UTBM, 90010 Belfort cedex – France IFSTTAR / AME / LTE, 25 Avenue François Mitterand, Case24, Cité des mobilités, F-69675 Bron cedex – France 3 FR FCLAB, CNRS 3539 – France Corresponding author: alexandre.ravey@utbm.fr Abstract—This paper proposes a novel control strategy for fuel cell electric vehicle including hydrid tanks using fuzzy logic controller. The aim of the study is to manage both thermal and electric energy with the same controller in order to use the fuel cell system as a range extender by preventing the batteries state of charge to drop too quickly. The presented controller use both batteries state of charge and thermal status of hydrid tank to control the fuel cell power. This work is a part of the Mobypost project, which aims to build and test a fleet of 10 fuel cell electric vehicles with their own refuelling hydrogen station based on hydrogen production by water electrolysis with solar panel. I. I NTRODUCTION Electric mobility is expected to play a key role in the future of clean energy transportation. Nevertheless, due to autonomy limitation, Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) appear to be the best mid-term solution [1]–[3], specially with Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Vehicle (FCHEV) which allow zero emission mobility. The design and control of such powertrain must be carefully done to determine the size of each energy sources. When the vehicle is build for specific applications, such as postal delivery, the conception can be optimize for its use [4], [5]. In order to store the hydrogen into the vehicle, two ways are commonly used: On one hand, high pressure tanks allow the vehicle to be quickly filled with hydrogen but requires the use of a compressor in order to be able to reach the pressure value (300 bar), degrading the energy cost from the source to the wheel [6]. On the other hand, metal hydrid tanks allow a low pressure charge, avoiding the use of compressor but need to be thermally managed to be able to provide the desired flow of hydrogen. Several studies about energy management of FCHEV can be found into the literature [7]–[10], but are not taking into account the hydrogen storage constraints and limits. This paper aims to integrate metal hydrid tanks into the energy management of the powertrain, taking into account its thermal power needs in order to control the flow of hydrogen delivered. In a first part, the Mobypost project within this study has been done will be explained. Power profile derivated from specific driving cycles will be then presented, followed by the components model of the powertrain in order to be able to simulate the system behavior which will be controlled by a fuzzy logic controller. Results are finally drawn and discussed in the conclusion. k,((( II. M OBYPOST P ROJECT Mobypost is a European project which aims at developing the concept of electric vehicles powered by fuel cells for delivery application as well as local hydrogen production and associated refuelling station. The project is based on a consortium including 8 partners: • University of Technology of Belfort-Montbeliard (UTBM) - France; • DUCATI energia S.p.A. - Italy; • Mahytec Sarl - France; • MES - Switzerland; • European Institute for Energy Research (Eifer) - Germany; • H2Nitidor s.r.l. - Italy; • SteinBeis-Europa-Zentrum - Germany; • La Poste - France. Fig. 1: Mobypost project concept Fig. 1 show the concept of the project which is divided in two parts: In a first part called infrastructure, the project aims at design and build a hydrogen production and distribution station. Solar panel equip the building and which feed an electrolyser in Authorized licensed use limited to: Bar Ilan University. Downloaded on May 23,2022 at 11:55:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. order to produce hydrogen which is store on site in a low pressure tank. No additional gas compression is done, which allow the system to produce hydrogen with no electricity added but water. The second part is focus on the vehicle. The conception of a lightweight hybrid electric car including fuel cell and batteries is done by design the powertrain and size the components taking into account the mobility application: postal delivery services. Its include a low pressure metal hydrid tank which is refilled by the hydrogen station. The vehicle is designed to have an autonomy matching with a postal delivery day of services. III. V EHICLE P OWERTRAIN A. Powertrain architecture The vehicle considered in this study is a series FCHEV based on a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) and Li-iron-phosphate-Magnesium (LiFeMgPO4) batteries pack with two in-wheels motor (Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine) and their associated inverters as shown in Fig. 2 [11], [12]. The PEMFC is connected to the DC bus via a DC/DC converter whereas the batteries are directly linked to the bus [13]. Consequently, only the fuel cell power can be controlled, the batteries are used as a buffer absorbing the peak power during acceleration phases. where Fa is the drag force, Fr the rolling friction, and Fg the force caused by gravity when driving on non-horizontal roads: 1 ρ A Cx v 2 Fa = (2) 2 Fr = mv Cr g cos(α) (3) (4) Fg = mv g sin(α) Variable ρ is the air density, g the standard gravity, v the speed of the vehicle and α the angle defining the slope of the road. The vehicle designed regarding postal delivery applications has the following characteristics: • Mass (mv ): 530 kg; • Front surface (A): 2.56 m2 ; • Drag coefficient (Cx ): 0.8; • Rolling coefficient (Cr ): 0.02; • Battery capacity: 5 kWh; • Fuel cell power: 1 kW. The power profile can be computed using the driving cycle shown in Fig. 3 as an input of the model [16]. Results is shown in Fig. 4. 50 speed (km/h) 40 30 20 10 0 0 Fig. 2: Powertrain architecture and control 2000 4000 6000 8000 Time (s) 10000 12000 Fig. 3: Speed profile B. Power profile Simulations are run using a backward approach [14]: The input of the model is the power profile derivated from the driving cycle of the vehicle. In order to compute this profile, a vehicle model is used coupled with a real driving cycle. 2) Vehicle model: The drive power Pmot (t) is derived from Newton’s second law,as in (1) [15]: d Pmot (t) = v mv (t) v(t) + Fa (t) + Fr (t) + Fg (t) (1) dt x 10 1 Power (W) 1) Driving cycle: The driving cycle used for this study has been recorded from existing Electric Vehicle (EC) used for French postal delivery. The vehicle designed within the Mobypost project is willing to replace the existed EV one (Fig. 3). Knowing this specific use, the design has been focus around this driving cycle to optimize as best as possible both the sizing and the control of the powertrain. 4 1.5 0.5 0 −0.5 −1 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 Time (s) 10000 12000 Fig. 4: Power profile Authorized licensed use limited to: Bar Ilan University. Downloaded on May 23,2022 at 11:55:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. C. Fuel cell model Fuel cell system nominal power used in our application is 1kW . This PEMFC is working at atmospheric pressure cooled by forced air. Thanks to the powertrain hybrid series architecture, the fuel cell operates as the main energy converter (range extender) and the batteries provides the transient currents. In this context the fuel cell is mainly working at specific operating points that are close to static conditions. Regarding the previous assumption a static model (5) of the fuel cell is sufficient and does not require high computation power. 1) electrical model: The voltage of the stack is given by (5): Vstack (I) = E0 − RI − Aln(I) − m exp (nI) (5) where E0 ,A,m and n are empirical coefficients determined by a non-linear regression method described in [17]. 2) consumption model: The flow of hydrogen by power has been determined experimentally by the fuel cell manufacturer for the specified fuel cell used in the powertrain. Results are shown in Fig. 5. 2) Thermal model: The aim of the thermal model is to determine the thermal power Pthtank to provide in order to insure the thermal needs which allows the extraction of a given hydrogen flow n. It is assumed that the air coming from the fuel cell is blown uniformly on all the surface of the cylinder metal hydrid tank. The reaction can be assumed as a thermal conduction and can be expressed by (8): Pthtank (t) = dT (t)2πλL ln RR21 (8) Where dT (t) is the difference of temperature of tank surface assuming no thermal power is given during (t) in K, λ is the thermal conductivity in W m−1 K −1 which has been estimated to 1.087 in [18] , L the length of the tank in m, R2 the external radius of the tank in m and R1 the internal radius in m. Fig. 6 shows the different value of dT (t) by hydrogen flow nl. dT (t) values have been estimated based on measurement of the temperature at the cylinder’s surface when the fuel cell is running at different working points. These values are not SoCH2 dependant. Consequently, this model is not correct for the whole range of tank’s state of charge since it has been shown in [18] that the thermal needs increase while SoCH2 decrease. 1 0.9 Delta of temperature (%) 0.8 Fig. 5: Fuel cell flow by power 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 3) fuel cell thermal model: In thermal power PF Cth which is produce by the fuel cell is defined by (6): PF Cth = 1 Vstack Iηb 2 (6) Where ηb is the blower efficiency, which is determine by the manufacturer of the fuel cell (70%). D. Hydrid tank model 1) State of charge determination: Since the State of Charge of metal hydrid tank (SoCH2 ) is not pressure dependent, its need to be estimated. A simple flow integration is used (7): t 1 MH2 n(t) SoCH2 (t) = SoCH2init − dt (7) mtot 0 60 where mtot is the maximal mass of hydrogen stored in the tank, MH2 is the hydrogen molar mass and n(t) is the flow in nl. 0.1 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 h2 flow (%) Fig. 6: Experimental determination of dT by hydrogen flow n E. Battery model The batteries model is a simple current integration to compute the batteries SoC, in this study Vb is considered as constant. SoC(t) ηb = ηb SoCinit − Cnom 0.95 if Ib < 0 = 1 if Ib ≥ 0 t 0 Ib (t)dt (9) (10) where Cnom is the batteries nominal capacity given by the manufacturer and ηb the batteries efficiency. Authorized licensed use limited to: Bar Ilan University. Downloaded on May 23,2022 at 11:55:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. F. DC/DC converter model TABLE I: Controller areas definition for P h The DC converter is modelled as a basic energy converter with a given constant efficiency. Iout = ηconv Iin Uin Uout (11) Pheater is considered to be high where Uout is constant because Uout = VBatt and where Iin = If c , ηconv is constant and equal to 0.85. Notation P h fuzzy value P hlimit 0.9 P hvery high min 0.8 P hvery high max P hhigh min P hhigh max P hgood min P hgood max 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.1 0 Description Pheater is considered to be highly critical Pheater is considered to be very high Pheater is considered to be good TABLE II: Controller areas definition for SoC Description G. Load model The power split between the fuel cell current IF C and the batteries current Ib is given by (12). SoC is considered to be critical SoC is considered to be low SoC is considered to be good SoC is considered to be high Imot (t) = IF C (t) + Ib (t) IV. (12) Notation SoC value SoClimit SoClow min SoClow max SoCgood min SoCgood max SoChigh min SoChigh max 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 TABLE III: Controller areas definition for IF C E NERGY MANAGEMENT Description Since the batteries are directly link to the DC-bus, only the fuel cell can be controlled. Control strategy will aim to control the fuel cell running at its best efficiency point while keeping the state of charge of the batteries in its optimal zone [19], [20]. Moreover, due to technology constraints of the metal hydrid tank, their temperature need to be kept in a good zone in order to be able to provide the necessary flow of hydrogen need by the fuel cell. A fuzzy logic controller is used to determine the fuel cell current regarding the listed inputs. Fuel cell is shutdown Fuel cell run at low power point Fuel cell runs at its optimal point Fuel cell runs higher than its optimal point Fuel cell runs at maximum power Notation IF C value IF C shutdown IF C low min IF C low max IF C good min IF C good min IF C high min 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 IF C high min IF C very high 0.8 1 B. Fuzzy logic controller A. Thermal constraints definition Based on the model of hydrid tanks described in section III-D, the hydrogen flow is depending on the thermal power given by the Heat Transfer System (HTS). In addition of the fuel cell, a 500 W heater is added to the system in order to sustain the power needed in case of low fuel cell operation point. The thermal power given to the tanks can be describe as (13): The designed fuzzy logic controller has two inputs: the state of charge of the batteries SoC and the power needed by the heater Pheater described respectively in TABLE I and TABLE II. The ouput fuel cell current IF C is described in TABLE III. All datas for each input and output are gather to create the membership functions of the controller, drawn in Fig. 7, Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 Limit Where Pthtank is the thermal power given by the HTS to the tanks, PthF C is the thermal power provided by the fuel cell, Pheater is the power which need to be provided by an additional heater. the controller needs to keep Pheater as low as possible to avoid additional electrical costs of auxiliary, which will degrade the efficiency of the whole system. In this way, Pheater is defined as an input of the controller P h as follow (14): 2Pheater Ph = 100 Low Opt High 1 (13) Degree of memebership Pthtank (t) = PthF C (t) + Pheater (t) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 SoC Fig. 7: Membership function definition for batteries state of charge (14) Authorized licensed use limited to: Bar Ilan University. Downloaded on May 23,2022 at 11:55:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. Good High Very high cell current, the batteries current and the heater current. The controller, taking into account the cost of the additional heater, control the power of the fuel cell in order to keep the thermal power needed by the tanks as low as possible. Critical 0.8 0.6 Battery SoC profile 1 0.4 Battery SoC Degree of memebership 1 0.2 0.5 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 4000 5000 6000 4000 5000 6000 time (s) 1 Fuel cell power Pheater Fig. 8: Membership function definition for the power needed by the heater FC Power (W) 0 1000 500 0 0 1000 2000 3000 time (s) Shutdown Low Opt High Driving cycle Very high speed (m.s−1) Degree of memebership 1 0.8 0.6 60 40 20 0 0 1000 2000 3000 time (s) 0.4 Fig. 10: Battery SoC and fuel cell current for the simulated driving cycle 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Fuel cell current Fig. 9: Membership function definition for the output current of the fuel cell Fuel cell power( W) 0 Fuel cell power 1000 500 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 4000 5000 6000 4000 5000 6000 The fuzzy logic controller is selecting the ouput regarding all the state of the input according to the fuzzy rules described in TABLE IV. These rules has been defined from the study presented in [8] and experimental test on hydrid tank system within the vehicle’s architecture presented in [12]. Rate of heat flow (W) time (s) Heat power needed by tank 600 400 200 0 0 1000 2000 3000 time (s) R ESULTS 150 The simulation is run on a postal delivery driving cycle presented Fig. 3. Fig. 10 shows the output of the fuzzy controller PF C regarding both batteries state of charge SoC and vehicle speed v. It can be observed that the SoC is kept in its good zone (TABLE II) and the fuel cell power is increased during high power phases causes by high dynamic of the vehicle. Fig. 11 shows respectively the power of the fuel cell PF C , of the tank Pthtank and by the additional heater Pheater . It can be observed that during the first half of the simulation, when the driving cycle has high dynamics, the fuel cell power is set at a higher point than optimal value (TABLE III) in order to maintain the state of charge of the batteries in the good zone. Consequently, the power needed by the additional heater is high and the range extender system’s efficiency is not optimal. During the second phases, the power of the fuel cell is controlled in order to avoid the use of the additional heater. Fig. 12 focus on this part by presenting respectively the fuel Pheater (W) V. Additional Heat power 100 50 0 0 1000 2000 3000 time (s) Fig. 11: Metal hydrid tanks results VI. C ONCLUSION A control strategy of a fuel cell electric vehicle with hydrid tanks has been presented. The fuzzy controller include the thermal management of the powertrain including heat transfer between the fuel cell and the metal hydrid tank in order to control the fuel cell power. A simulation of a realistic driving cycle for postal delivery application has been run, showing the good behavior of the controller. Future works aims to embed Authorized licensed use limited to: Bar Ilan University. Downloaded on May 23,2022 at 11:55:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply. TABLE IV: Fuzzy logic rules SoClimit SoClow SoCgood SoChigh P hlimit IF C min IF C shutdown IF C shutdown IF C shutdown P hvery high IF C high IF C good IF C min IF C min P hhigh IF C high IF C good IF C good IF C min P hgood IF C very high IF C high IF C good IF C shutdown FC current (A) Fuel cell current 35 30 25 20 15 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 5500 6000 5500 6000 Battery current (A) time (s) Battery current 200 100 0 −100 4000 4500 5000 Heater current (A) time (s) Additional Heat current 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 4000 4500 5000 time (s) Fig. 12: Focus on the impact of the additional heat on the control the control inside the electronic control unit of each of the ten vehicles which will be build for the project. ACKNOWLEDGMENT This research work is carried out within the framework of European project MobyPost which aims at developing the concept of electric vehicles powered by fuel cells for delivery application as well as local hydrogen production and associated refueling station and hydrogen production apparatus from photovoltaic generators. MobyPost is a project funded under the Grant Agreement no. 256834 by the European Union’s seventh Framework programme (FP7/2007-2013) for the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Joint Technology Initiative (http://mobypostproject.eu/). R EFERENCES [1] A. Emadi and S. Williamson, “Fuel cell vehicles: opportunities and challenges,” in Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004. IEEE. IEEE, 2004, pp. 1640–1645. [2] B. Blunier, D. Bouquain, and A. Miraoui, Alternative Propulsion Systems for Automobiles. expert verlag, 2008, no. 2, ch. Fuel cells, Energy Management using Fuel Cells and Supercapacitors, pp. 97–116, iSBN-13: 978-3-8169-2835-5. [4] A. Ravey, N. Watrin, B. Blunier, D. Bouquain, and A. Miraoui, “Energy-source-sizing methodology for hybrid fuel cell vehicles based on statistical description of driving cycles,” Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 4164–4174, 2011. [5] A. Ravey, R. Roche, B. Blunier, and A. Miraoui, “Combined optimal sizing and energy management of hybrid electric vehicles,” pp. 1–6, 2012. [6] B. Blunier and A. Miraoui, “Proton exchange membrane fuel cell air management in automotive applications,” Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 041007, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://link.aip.org/link/?FCT/7/041007/1 [7] M. Zandi, A. Payman, J. Martin, S. Pierfederici, B. Davat, and F. Meibody-Tabar, “Energy management of a fuel cell/supercapacitor/battery power source for electric vehicular applications,” Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 433–443, 2011. [8] A. Ravey, B. Blunier, and A. Miraoui, “Control strategies for fuel-cellbased hybrid electric vehicles: From offline to online and experimental results,” Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 2452–2457, 2012. [9] J. T. Pukrushpan, A. G. Stefanopoulou, and H. Peng, Control of Fuel Cell Power Systems : Principle, Modeling Analysis and Feedback Design. Advances in Industrial Control, 2004, iSBN : 1852338164. [10] A. Ravey, B. Blunier, S. Lukic, and A. Miraoui, “Control strategy of fuel cell hybrid electric vehicle based on driving cycle recognition,” pp. 1–5, 2012. [11] C. Higel, F. Harel, D. Candusso, S. Faivre, A. Ravey, D. Guilbert, A. Ndiaye, D. Bouquain, A. Djerdir, A. Gaillard et al., “Part 1: Mobypost vehicles powertrain modeling, simulation and sizing,” 2013. [12] S. Faivre, A. Ravey, D. Guilbert, A. Ndiaye, A. Gaillard, D. Bouquain, A. Djerdir, C. Higel, F. Harel, D. Candusso et al., “Part 2-mobypost vehicles powertrain design and experimental validation,” 2013. [13] S. Lukic, J. Cao, R. Bansal, F. Rodriguez, and A. Emadi, “Energy storage systems for automotive applications,” Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2258–2267, 2008. [14] A. Ravey, N. Watrin, B. Blunier, and A. Miraoui, “Energy sources sizing for hybrid fuel cell vehicles based on statistical description of driving cycles,” in Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, 2010. VPPC ’2010. IEEE, 2010. [15] L. Guzzella and A. Sciarretta, Vehicle Propulsion Systems, Introdution to modeling and optimization, 1st ed. Springer, 2005. [16] J. Liu and H. Peng, “Modeling and control of a power-split hybrid vehicle,” Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1242–1251, 2008. [17] B. Blunier and A. Miraoui, Piles à combustible, Principe, modélisation et applications avec exercices et problèmes corrigés, ser. Technosup, Ellipses, Ed., 2007. [18] A. Jemni, S. B. Nasrallah, and J. Lamloumi, “Experimental and theoretical study of ametal–hydrogen reactor,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 631–644, 1999. [19] A. Ravey, B. Blunier, and A. Miraoui, “Control strategies for fuel cell based hybrid electric vehicles: From offline to online,” in Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2011 IEEE. IEEE, 2011, pp. 1–4. [20] M. Hajimiri and F. Salmasi, “A fuzzy energy management strategy for series hybrid electric vehicle with predictive control and durability extension of the battery,” pp. 1–5, 2006. [3] S. Barrett, “Fcvs will be a key element in european vehicle powertrains portfolio to achieve 2050 goals,” Fuel Cells Bulletin, vol. 2011, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2011. Authorized licensed use limited to: Bar Ilan University. Downloaded on May 23,2022 at 11:55:40 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.