Uploaded by Eric Yeh

Essay 3 EWRT1B Eric Yeh (1)

advertisement
Eric Yeh
Julie Pesano
Sp 23 EWRT 1B
6/19/2023
Literature: The Tool for Criticism and Change
Historically, literature has long been considered a vessel, a formidable tool for
social criticism. This tool offers writers a means to address and challenge the significant
atrocities, injustices, and oppression of the respective societies of their time. The literary
works "A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift, "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Martin
Luther King Jr., and "Trifles" by Susan Glaspell all employ symbols and motifs to
criticize the contrasting oppression towards society.
The period of the 18th century was a time of significant transformation, known as
the Age of Enlightenment. Jonathan Swift witnessed the historical advancements in
scientific reasoning and the idealism that challenged the conventional traditionalist
authority—the period faced political turmoil, alongside power struggles between political
and religious conflicts, as well as colonial expansion. Swift's life oversaw these events,
and ultimately shaped his views and fuelled his satire, and he became acutely aware of
the injustices inflicted upon his homeland by the English. This awareness is seen
through his satire in "A Modest Proposal." “Satire is traditionally thought of as a literary
mode with a moral purpose; the satirist writes ‘with a sense of moral vocation and with a
concern for the public interest.’ It is clear that satires often address the same sorts of
particular moral problems that papers in applied ethics do.” (Diehl) The satire intended
to expose injustice and oppression. “Satires are works of fiction, but they are also veiled
commentary on some aspect of the real world … to succeed in its satirical aims,
especially when the target is a particular or state of affairs, a satire must establish a
recognizable relationship between that which is doing the satirizing and that which is
being satirized, that is, between fiction and target.” (Diehl) The use of satire and irony
was successfully employed by Swift to create the relationship to highlight the absurdity
of the reality.
The relationship drawn brought attention to the injustice of the circumstances,
and questioned the concepts of conformity versus rebellion to the reader's morals. Swift
proposed that the poor and malnourished Irish should sell their very own children as
food for the wealthy English as a satirical means of both alleviating poverty and
providing a source of income. "A young healthy child well nursed is, at a year old, a
most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or
boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout" (Swift).
Swift aimed to use these dark, horrific visual motifs to shock the reader out of conformity
and to confront the reality of the situation instead, and the severity of the oppression
and suffering of the Irish. “Swift's Proposal is ultimately understandable as satire
because of the careful parallels that Swift constructs between his fictional projector and
the existing discourse on the Irish situation, in keeping with the usual tactics of satiric
parody.” (Diehl) The exaggerated scenario and use of parody given mirrors the
inhumanity and exploitatios present during Swift’s time.
Similarly, 1963 saw a period of power struggles and political turmoil. Racial
segregation and systemic oppression were present alongside the rebellion through civil
rights activism, and Martin Luther King Jr addressed this through his "Letter from
Birmingham Jail." The Birmingham Campaign, a nonviolent protest led by King, aimed
to challenge and end segregation in the setting of an exceptionally racially divided city.
"For years now, I have heard the word 'Wait!'...This 'Wait' has almost always meant
'Never.'" (King). King uses the symbol of time to criticize the concept of waiting for
justice. King uses time as a concept to argue for the urgency of moving away from
conformity and complacency and toward peaceful rebellion against racial oppression
and injustice.
King sees time as something not to be wasted and should not be used as
justification for delaying immediate action upon the systemic oppression present in his
time. "Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and establish such creative
tension that a community that has consistently refused to negotiate is forced to confront
the issue." (King, 1963). King criticized the white religious leaders and the moderate
white man who criticized \ the protests. These critics advocated for gradual change
rather than immediate action. “Yet his logic throughout the Letter is unanswerable. In a
brilliant paragraph he answers the charge that his actions ‘precipitate violence’: he
challenges the logic of the clergymen and in a series of increasingly dramatic, grammatically parallel rhetorical questions, he reveals that those who make direct action
necessary are guilty of precipitating violence:” (Mott) King’s strong writing helped
challenge the ensuing politcal struggle, and advocate for nonviolence in a very
intelligent counterarguement and comparison. King rebutted with the motif of nonviolent
direct action and argued that peaceful protest, immediate action, and civil disobedience
would be the catalyst for social change and action that was needed to challenge not
only the critics but the nation as a whole on their moral standing and conformity.
The early 20th century saw similar systemic oppression. The political turmoil
faced head-on by the suffrage movement and the fight for women's rights. Susan
Glaspell was influenced and fueled by the historical events of this era, as she was an
active participant in the feminist movement. Glaspell drew from her experiences and
observations of gender inequality and utilized symbols within “Trifles” to highlight the
oppression and injustices women in early 20th-century America faced. "She—come to
think of it, she was kind of like a bird herself—real sweet and pretty, but kind of timid
and—fluttery. How—she—did—change." (Glaspell). The birdcage serves as a metaphor
for the imprisonment of women’s rights and freedom of speech. The bird’s death
symbolized the death of Minnie Wright’s freedom due to societal norms and oppressive
expectations of women of the era. The quilt that Mrs. Peters and Mrs. Hale discover
while investigating Minnie's home was utilized as a symbol of Minnie’s life, and how the
knots represented slow deformations mirroring emotional turmoil and hardship caused
by societal oppression. These symbols served as Glaspell's literary tool to critique
societal norms and expectations of women.
“Glaspell's need to change the ending of the trial, to empower women to rectify
an unjust situation, is both a criticism of the legal system and an indictment of the social
and romantic conventions of society. The danger to women is not only in the legal
system but also for those who do not run afoul of the law, in the very structure of
marriage.” (Alkalay-Gut) The analysis and evaluation given align well with Glasepll’s
intentions in her writing, and it shows that Glaspell was exceptionally skilled at using her
writing as a vessel to criticize the injustices towards women within not only the legal
system but society as a whole. “This story calls attention to some important features of
women's culture: that the signs common to women's experience can make up a
complex text capable of many readings; that in such a text women can read esoteric
messages that are not easily accessible to men, including messages that comment on
women's roles in relation to men, messages it would not be safe to express directly.”
(Radner). The symbols employed by Glasepll, and the themes conveyed by the literary
works as a whole. help subtly emphasize the importance of or indirectly advocate for
women’s rights. The implementation of such writing techniques and literary devices are
powerful and expressive to make political and cultural arguments that also resonate
deeply with the community being fought for Glasepll’s writing challenges conformity
and advocates for the importance of women's perspectives, strengths, and experiences
during oppressive circumstances through her motifs and symbols.
"A Modest Proposal," "Letter from Birmingham Jail," and "Trifles" effectively
criticize the injustices and oppressive societies of their respective times through the
literary tools of satire, symbolism, and motifs. Writing can be a vessel to express
yourself, but when you are shaped and challenged by hardships, it can become more.
Systemic oppression, political struggles, turmoil, or racial inequality can all be catalysts
to address through righting. A variety of iterary tools can effectively address and
connect with the reader, question their morality, or even demand action. Writing is
essential to change, to progress.
Works Cited
Alkalay-Gut, Karen (1995). "Murder and Marriage: Another Look at Trifles". In
Ben-Zvi, Linda (ed.). Susan Glaspell: Essays on Her Theater and Fiction. The
University of Michigan Press.
Diehl, Nicholas. “Satire, Analogy, and Moral Philosophy.” The Journal of
Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 71, no. 4, 2013, pp. 311–21. JSTOR,
http://www.jstor.org/stable/42635868.
King, Martin Luther Jr. (1963). Letter from Birmingham Jail (PDF). Stanford, CA:
The Martin Luther King, Jr. Research and Education Institute.
Glaspell, Susan. Trifles: A Play in One Act. Boston, Walter H. Baker, 1924.
Mcnamara, James. “A Life of Jonathan Swift, beyond Satire.” The New York
Times, 20 Feb. 2017,
www.nytimes.com/2017/02/20/books/review/jonathan-swift-biography-john-stubb
s.html.
Mott, Wesley T. “The Rhetoric of Martin Luther King, Jr.: Letter from Birmingham
Jail.” Phylon (1960-), vol. 36, no. 4, 1975, pp. 411–21. JSTOR,
https://doi.org/10.2307/274640.
Radner, Joan N., and Susan S. Lanser. “The Feminist Voice: Strategies of
Coding in Folklore and Literature.” The Journal of American Folklore, vol. 100,
no. 398, 1987, pp. 412–25. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/540901.
Swift, Jonathan, 1667-1745. A Modest Proposal. Champaign, Ill.: Project
Gutenberg, 1997.
Download