LAC NARRATIVE REPORT
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT
The discussion started at 1:00 in the afternoon. It started with a prayer by Ms. Lorriane Paluga.
Instructional materials play a vital role in the teaching and learning process. Teachers also play
critical roles in developing adequate and effective instructional materials to cater the diverse
needs of their students. This topic is conducted to encourage them to use their creativity in
making their own learning materials which can supplement their instructional needs.
I discussed the different types of instructional materials and differentiated the instructional
materials used in traditional teaching and digital teaching as the resource speaker. I emphasized
that, “Traditional teaching is not digital”. Yet I quoted Bill Gates’ statement that says,
“Technology is just a tool, in terms of getting the kids working together and motivating them,
the teacher is still the most important” which boosted the moral of the participants in the
challenging role being the digital immigrants of the learners who are digital natives.
The activity ended on making instructional materials to produce attractive usable and durable
tools of instructions to be used in each grade level.
Prepared by:
BRIAN JAY MANDAAN
SLAC Facilitator
Noted by:
RAMIR FRANCIS P. DESALISA
School Head
LAC NARRATIVE REPORT
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION AND TEST CONSTRUCTION
The discussion started at 8:00 in the morning. Mr. Ruel Gonzales introduced me as the 1st
speaker in the 2nd day of the LAC session.
LAC sessions ensure good educational systems that give opportunities for both approaches to
professional development programs to be available and accessible to teachers. It also enforces
community practice with collaborative planning, problem solving, and action implementation
to improve teacher’s knowledge, skills, strategies and ethics.
With this, I talked about the Table of Specifications and Test Construction. It ensures that the
test developed assesses the content taught and the learning experience given to the students. It
also helps align the test with learning objectives and their cognitive.
During the session the revised Bloom’s Taxonomy was discussed and gave examples of a TOS
chart.
The activity ended on creating TOS, constructing MELC-based multiple choice test item, and
the teachers reflected on making classroom assessment in each grade level.
Prepared by:
RONNIE P. DESALISA
SLAC Facilitator
Noted by:
RAMIR FRANCIS P. DESALISA
School Head
LAC NARRATIVE REPORT
CLASSROOM LEADERSHIP MANAGEMENT STYLES
The discussion started at 10:00 in the morning. Mr. Ronnie P. Desalisa introduced me as the
2nd speaker in the 2nd day of the LAC session.
“Each teacher has his or her own style of teaching and classroom management. There are as many styles
as there are teachers. Much of the style of any teacher will come from their own unique personality.
However, a great deal of what we might call our classroom management style comes from our attitudes
and pedagogical choices. In the domain of personality, each of us can find ways to translate our personal
style into an effective teaching demeanor. Yet in the domain of choices and attitudes, some styles will
be lead to substantially different outcomes than others (Harris, 1998).” I quoted.
Herewith, I shared different Leadership and Management styles that could benefit my co- teachers to
use on their classrooms which are Authoritarian, Authoritative, Permissive and Indulgent.
I shared each of these styles to establish and sustain an orderly environment for the students to
create opportunities for meaningful academic learning and fosters social and emotional growth,
and to help my co-teachers reduce negative behaviors and increase their time to the devoted
lesson.
The activity ended on differentiating the styles through a role play with participants and having
them make a slogan about leadership.
Prepared by:
RUEL L. GONZALES JR.
SLAC Facilitator
Noted by:
RAMIR FRANCIS P. DESALISA
School Head