UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY TAXILA
DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION ENGINEERING
Final Project Report
Computer Aided Design(LAB)
SUBMITTED BY:
ZOHAIB NASIR (22-TE-103)
SUBMITTED TO:
Dr. ENGR. Farzana Kalsoom
DATE:
14-JULY-2023
Figure:
Report of 2D Model of Aero plane
1. Problem Definition:
- Clearly defines the complex engineering problem related to the simple “Airplane”.
- Identifies the key challenges and requirements accurately and comprehensively.
2. Multiple Solution Proposals:
- Provides multiple well-thought-out solution proposals.
- Each proposal demonstrates creativity, feasibility, and addresses the identified problem.
3. Method Selection:
- Selects an appropriate engineering method or approach to tackle the problem.
- Justifies the choice of the method based on its suitability, applicability, and potential.
4. Method Application:
- Skillfully applies the selected method using AutoCAD to develop the solution.
- Demonstrates a deep understanding of AutoCAD tools and features relevant to the problem.
5. Result Generation:
- Generates accurate and well-documented results using AutoCAD.
- Presents the results in a clear, organized, and visually appealing manner.
6. Conclusion:
- Provides a comprehensive and well-supported conclusion based on the obtained results.
- Summarizes the effectiveness of the selected method in solving the problem.
7. Evaluation:
- Critically evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed solutions and the applied
method.
- Identifies areas of improvement and suggests potential modifications or enhancements.
Assessment
Criteria
Unsatisfactory
Meet Expectations
Exceed Expectations
The problem is
partially defined
but lacks some
important details
and specifications.
The problem is
well-defined and
includes all
necessary details
and specifications.
The problem is precisely
and comprehensively
defined with meticulous
attention to details and
specifications.
Multiple
Solutions
Only one solution is
proposed, with no
consideration of
alternative
approaches.
Multiple solutions
are proposed, but
they are limited in
scope and lack
creativity or
innovation.
Multiple solutions
are proposed,
considering various
approaches and
demonstrating
some creativity or
innovation.
Multiple well-thought-out
solutions are proposed,
considering a wide range
of approaches, with high
creativity and innovation.
Method
Selection
The method chosen
to solve the
problem is
irrelevant or
inappropriate,
considering the
problem
requirements.
The method chosen
to solve the
problem is
somewhat relevant,
but it does not fully
address the
problem
requirements.
The method chosen
to solve the
problem is relevant
and suitable,
addressing most of
the problem
requirements.
The method chosen to
solve the problem is highly
relevant, appropriate, and
comprehensively addresses
all problem requirements.
The method is
applied partially
and contains some
errors or
inaccuracies in
generating results.
The method is
applied correctly,
producing accurate
results but with
minimal analysis or
interpretation.
The method is applied
flawlessly, generating
accurate and
comprehensive results
with a thorough analysis
and interpretation.
Problem
Definition
The problem is not
clearly defined and
lacks essential
details and
specifications.
Developing
The method is
applied incorrectly
or incompletely,
resulting in
Application incorrect or
of Method insufficient results.
Conclusion
and
Evaluation
The conclusion is
missing or lacks a
clear evaluation of
the results
obtained.
The conclusion
summarizes the
The conclusion
findings and
provides a brief
evaluates the
summary but lacks results obtained
a detailed
based on the
evaluation of the
problem
results obtained.
requirements.
The conclusion provides a
concise summary,
thoroughly evaluates the
results obtained, and
suggests further
improvements or
recommendations.