ID
359845
360692
361013
361129
361319
Respondent
Name
Scott Birnie
Representation
Response
I think it's a great idea and I hope that the sale goes ahead
Carolyn
Mcintosh
Emma Horne
Morrisons should be allowed to purchase and build. Good
competition for other supermarkets
I think that the use of ground for a supermarket including fuel
station etc would be of great benefit to the community and
residents of Banff, Macduff and surrounding. It would provide
jobs and reduce commuting pollution considering the nearest
supermarket is roughly 20 miles away
it should go ahead
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarket plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc and
benefit to community and environment have been noted and will be
included in the report to Area Committee.
Graeme
Clark
Tracy
Thomson
361324
Anonymous
361385
Darren Park
361454
Derek
thomson
361994
Clifford Still
I think selling the land to benefit the local people is a good thing.
Personally, I don’t see that the proposed space is required any
more due to the new sports facilities in both Macduff and Banff.
People from the area have to travel at least 25 miles to reach a
decent competitive supermarket with a decent range of foods
especially for people with limited dietary needs. They also visit
other shops and eateries whilst outwith the town doing shopping.
Surely it makes sense if people of Banff and Macduff can shop
in their own towns, more money will be kept within the towns
also benefitting local businesses.
Another supermarket would be great, but an Aldi would be
preferred as Tesco and Coop can be very expensive for a
weekly shop if you do not have the means of transport
No Issue selling the land for a new supermarket
Personally, I would have preferred Sainsbury’s however we are
in desperate need of a decent sized supermarket in the area so
I’m more than happy to support this sale as the land is mostly
disused now anyway and not very nice to look at as you come
into Banff so a supermarket isn’t going to be any worse. At least
it’s providing employment, cheaper fuel and better choice for the
area
I think having a Morrison's shop in this area would benefit Banff,
Macduff and the surrounding area. There is a sad lack of choice
for grocery shopping and for the purchase of reasonable priced
Positive response to sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
have been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarket plc and
potential positive impact to local businesses have been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee
Aberdeenshire Council has confirmed Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
(“Morrisons”) as the preferred bidder for the site following an extensive
marketing and selection exercise.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Aberdeenshire Council has confirmed Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
(“Morrisons”) as the preferred bidder for the site following an extensive
marketing and selection exercise. Positive response to sale of land and
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee. In
1
ID
Respondent
Name
362071
Irena Mitchell
362207
Hazel
McSporran
362219
Shona Young
362457
Kelly Griffiths
Representation
Response
fuel. The only reservation I would have would be any possible
demolition of the old town wall which has already suffered at the
hands of graffiti and past part demolition. The area appears to
be mostly derelict and surely it is better to have land used than
lying unused.
Fully in favour of it. Feel like the town and surrounding areas
will benefit from this.
There are already three supermarkets in the town accessible to
people without cars. This vast area at the start of what is an
historic town with many listed buildings is not in the spirit of
improving Banff. Using the site for market gardening or
orchards would be more in keeping with environmental
improvements and jobs. The increased traffic to that area of
Banff and the bridge junction would be detrimental to the town
and the environment. I object to the sale for the purposes of a
supermarket. In addition light pollution from car park lighting
would be an unacceptable issue in the ancient town. It would
make our town ugly, it is not environmentally friendly option,
please do not sell this land for the purposes of supermarkets.
Thank you.
relation to the old town wall Historic Environment Scotland are statutory
consultees in the planning process.
I think this is wonderful opportunity for the area. Banff/Macduff is
so ready for a decent sized supermarket. Currently we have to
travel at least twenty minutes away to do a big shop as the
current smaller one is not adequate to our needs. The
employment opportunities alone would be so beneficial to the
area. Morrison’s is a fab supermarket with good quality produce.
I really hope this goes through
I don't believe that a new supermarket in Banff is needed. There
is enough traffic flow in the area as it is. Its being placed in
between two supermarkets which provide enough for the people
of Banff. I believe that a morrisons would be great, but great in
Macduff, which doesn't have a supermarket. There is plenty of
space up in the industrial estate and I believe with the addition of
a Morrisons we could attract more shops and have a retail
/industrial park. There is a bus stop there already . It's at the side
of the town, meaning less traffic driving in the middle of town,
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The consultation relates specifically to the proposed sale of Common
Good Land to Morrisons as the preferred bidder for the site. The
consultation is not seeking views about alternative providers.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered as part of the planning application. The
proposal involves demolishing the old Bridge Street Community Centre,
which will reduce the look of dereliction in the lower part of the street
and may help stimulate other financial investment and property owners
in the vicinity to make positive changes to their properties.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and employment opportunities have been noted and will be included in
the report to Area Committee.
It is noted there has been discussions for other potential retailers, but
they were all offered the opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison
were selected via the competitive tendering process which the council is
obliged to comply with.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
2
ID
Respondent
Name
362463
Mrs Jessica
Wood
362538
Not Provided
Representation
Response
plenty of car parking space etc.... I really can't fathom why this
has not been proposed instead of Banff on community ground
which could be used in a much better way and of real use to the
Community. A huge No from me and my Family to it being in
Banff, a huge yes to having it in Macduff.
1. My view is that a new supermarket is exactly what Banff and
the surrounding area needs. The majority of people I know
(parents, parents in law, sisters/brothers, all my friends) do not
currently do their main food shop in Banff and travel to
fraserburgh, elgin, buckie or Huntly! I have a young son and
cannot get his formula or nappies in Banff so I am forced to
travel out of the area for essential items as the supermarkets we
have are not fit for purpose and the amount of people living in
the area. The area that they wish to build on is never used. I
sometimes park to go a walk with my son in the pram and 9 out
of 10 times I am the only car in carpark and their is plenty other
grass areas in the town and football pitches between Banff and
Macduff. 2. I feel it will bring people to the area as the closest
morrisons is peterhead or inverurie. When I travel to fraserburgh
or buckie for my food shopping, I then go to the butchers,
pharmacy's etc in these area therefore spending money in other
local towns. People would travel to Banff to go to morrisons
then use local surrounding shops. It will also create lots on jobs
which would be sought after in this area. 3. I have no concerns
but feel peoples concerns is that is close to other supermarkets
however the coop is more of a convenient store that people do
not do large food shops and tescos is not large enough for the
town. 4. I have no additional comments
I am all in favour of a new supermarket in banff or macduff I just
wish they would consider other options on location it seems a
awful waste for banff and macduff to be giving up the site at
canal park to be turned into brick and mortar, as you come over
the bridge looking left to right we have a wonderful river with the
view of a wonderful golf course with duff house behind that then
we have the nice open football field of canal park and then
princess royal grounds where the Deveron vale play out of then
we have the picturesque ellery gardens leading onto the high
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee.
It is noted there has been discussions for other potential retailers, but
they were all offered the opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison
were selected via the competitive tendering process which the council is
obliged to comply with.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design
3
ID
Respondent
Name
362556
Josie Haslam
362562
Nicole
Chalmers
362596
Jamie
McMurray
Representation
street in banff the views looking down on this from the hill O
dune are the envy of a lot of towns city's and villages, we would
be destroying these views if we were to plonk a big supermarket
there and not to mention taking away the home of a local football
team and the use of the grass pitch from locals , so for me
personally I am against the location not the idea, there is a sight
in banff that could well be used and in my opinion would be the
best option and that is the old grampian foods chicken factory
site now owned by a local building firm who has left the site in
such a state it is now becoming a health hazard for local
residents within that area.
I am 100% in favour of Morrison’s supermarket coming to Canal
Park. The benefits are numerous including encouraging people
to shop within Banff rather than travel. People would also come
to shop here thus creating added footfall around our area
benefitting local businesses. Also this would bring much needed
employment to Banff in an establishment that would be able to
remain open ever with the harshest lockdown restrictions. In
addition having worked alongside Morrison’s in the past, I know
they have strong ethical and sourcing values.
I’m in favour of this!! Don’t get me wrong the shops here are
good but I don’t drive and have to either order online or go to
Fraserburgh for a big shop! Brought up in banff and in all my
years I’ve hardly seen anyone use that field bit, think it’s perfect
spot! However it is close to other shops, why not have it
somewhere like the old chicken factory? But Morrison’s would
be good id rather that that nothing however something cheaper
would be better like Aldi or Iceland
Aberdeenshire council need to be transparent on what they will
utilise funds gained from the sale of the common land. The land
is currently used by several groups in the local community -will
there be investment in other, alternative areas used by the same
groups of people? Morrisons may benefit the Local economy
and provide additional investment into local infrastructure -
Response
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee. The
consultation relates specifically to the proposed sale of Common Good
Land to Morrisons as the preferred bidder for the site. The consultation
is not seeking views about alternative providers. It is noted there has
been discussions for other potential retailers, but they were all offered
the opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison were selected via the
competitive tendering process which the council is obliged to comply
with.
Any sale is subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a
Common Good Order, and obtaining planning consent. Legal terms are
still to be finalised with Morrisons. A planning application will need to be
separately submitted for consideration.
The final sale price is a seven-figure sum but due to commercial
confidentiality cannot be disclosed until the sale has concluded. The
sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
4
ID
Respondent
Name
362626
Avril Annand
362632
Not Provided
362647
362686
Lee
macgillivray
Hay
362820
Penny
362867
Sophie
duguid
362899
C Angus
362919
John Main
Representation
Response
however it has not yet been made clear how Aberdeenshire
Council will reinvest the funds made from the sale of the land.
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities. This
fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee. There are
no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as the
consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact has been noted and will be included in the report to
Area Committee.
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes.
Absolutely Brill news badly needed dont let this be another
Tesco fiasco let this go ahead
Wrong location. Lose of amenity ground. Better in Macduff ind.
estate. Spoil vision of Banff when crossing bridge. Require
transport to get there. Already supermarkets in that area -- gain
one probably loose one.
Great idea the town's need a big supermarket to save travelling
Great idea, more job opportunities and hopefully more affordable
food and drink that the shops already offer and variety.
No it would be a great thing having a proper supermarket in the
town as the tesco is rather small. However the location could be
better, it is too crampt down there and there are by far better
locations in the area it could go.
I think this would be a great addition to the town! Would give a
lot more choice to people who can only shop within the Banff
vicinity.
The land should be put to use in a way that benefits the health
and wellbeing of the community, not another supermarket that
will put more pressure on struggling local businesses. If it hax to
come to the area, why not site in Macduff to help upgrade the
towns facilities.
I think the idea of selling off this land is appalling. The park is
used by a large amount of the community, and has been
particularly valuable for socially distanced exercise over the past
year. Parks and outdoor places like this are vital for a thriving
and healthy community. In addition we clearly don't need
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact has been noted and will be included in the report to
Area Committee.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities. If the
development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities.
If the development goes ahead the new store will provide access for the
5
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
another supermarket when we are so well served with local
shops plus Co-op and Tesco almost adjacent to the site. This
scheme seems to be simply about the council making money at
the expense of the good people of Banff.
residents of the Banff/Macduff area to larger format retail provision and
particularly for those in the town who do not have access to their own
transport to visit similar premises in other towns. A significant number of
jobs could be created as a result of this development, both during
construction and in the supermarket’s operation.
It is possible that the development will reduce the cost of grocery, fuel,
and other goods to residents by introducing competition. Residents will
have access to an additional retail offering, meaning travel to other
areas is less necessary or not required. People outwith the immediate
catchment area may travel to use the
supermarket, bringing additional footfall and potential benefits to other
town centre retail.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Assuming the development goes ahead a Transport Assessment will be
necessary as part of any future planning application. This will involve
an assessment of the capacity/operation of the existing transport
network and will identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is
necessary in order to address any additional traffic generated as a
result of the development.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact has been noted and will be included in the report to
Area Committee.
6
362944
Kevin Grant
1) The sale should be voted on by all Macduff and Banff
community poll not behind closed doors surely the fact that it
belongs to the community in the deeds required this. 2)
Supermarket and fuel is great the location is wrong and should'
be in a managed traffic area not a bottle neck point and the
bridge infrastructure will not cope. 3) Location should be in a non
traffic bottle neck point or that close to the bridge, Macduff
industrial estate is ideal and in main road with multiple access
points for heavy traffic. 4) Tourism impact due to views distorted
, environment impact , infrastructure impact bottle necks points
,Bridge is weak and struggling already, local business impact,
what will be done to reduce all the above..
362946
James
Waples
I believe that the sale of this land can benefit the community as
a whole as long as other facilities are provided, but what cannot
be denied is that the community needs a decent sized
ID
Respondent
Name
362948
Gordon
Mackay
362952
Ann
Somerville
Representation
supermarket that will bring people into the town. Over the years
that companies have been refused planning permission or have
withdrawn from plans we have seen the town decline. The
argument has always been protect current business but years
have past and we are losing business not keeping or growing
them, also how many people have I heard saying they travel
outside the town to get a decent supermarket maybe it's time to
provide this in the town for those who cannot travel. Please pass
these plans and get things moving as soon as possible. Just a
footnote the number of people that own businesses in the town
that I have seen shopping out of town has to show how much
needed this is
1. I don't think the area should be used for a supermarket. It's
nice to drive across the bridge into Banff for there to be a green,
open space. It's dignified and classy. 2. I think the area needs
a better supermarket, but it should be built over the bridge in
Macduff. Can a site, perhaps at the Industrial Estate, be
suggested to Morrisons? 3. The Co-op will almost certainly
close, leading to a future eye-sore. The green, and smart
entrance to Banff will be forever gone. The supermarket will
look nice and modern for a while, but will soon date, as all
modern supermarket buildings do. 4. If minds have already
been made up, maybe insist the supermarket is built with a
traditional look to the facade. Also, I think a bank of mature
trees should be planted surrounding the development area
beside the New Road (area nearest the bridge). Also, perhaps
work with the Co-op to see if they can be helped with a transition
to a new use for their building. In summary, I do not think a
supermarket should be built on the proposed site. I think an
alternative site, in Macduff, should be suggested to the
company.
I agree with the proposal. Banff needs a supermarket that offers
everything but not a discount brand like Aldi, Lidl or Jack's.
Morrisons is a reasonable choice as we have no Marks and
Spencer or Waitrose.
Response
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered as part of any future planning application.
The development involves demolishing the old Bridge Street
Community Centre, which will reduce the look of dereliction in the lower
part of the street and may help stimulate other financial investment and
property owners in the vicinity to make positive changes to their
properties. There may be interest from other enterprises in locating in
the same part of town to take advantage of the increased footfall in this
area.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Aberdeenshire Council has confirmed Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
(“Morrisons”) as the preferred bidder for the site following an extensive
marketing and selection exercise. It is noted there has been
discussions for other potential retailers, but they were all offered the
opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison were selected via the
7
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
363001
Aileen Clark
1)Do not feel a green area should be sold for retail. It will destroy
the lovely view into Banff.
2)Benefit of over 100 jobs would I imagine be grossly
overestimated. Adding a huge store will just detract from any
independent businesses starting up and potentially compete with
existing stores causing them to close. 3)Global warming and the
future rising water levels would make this a risky area to put
buildings. Older residents of Banff can remember times the
areas involved have flooded.
363010
Stacey
363014
CP
McDonald
I personally think a new supermarket is what Banff/ Macduff
need BUT why morrisons I have to go out of the area every
week to go to a lidl not MORRISONS. I think a lodl would be
great
The location I don't agree on the area of where they are planning
on building WHY canal Park? The area is going to get busy with
the Spotty bag shop it's a hot stop at the best of time . WHY not
tannery Street Banff where the old chicken factory use to be ? I
is now a eye sore and not a pleasant sight or smell at the best of
times. Why dig up something that is perfectly fine? When you
can sort a lot of people issues with the sight on tannery and put
a new supermarket there, there has got to be ample room there
for parking etc
1. I think ther could be a more imaginative use of this space that
would maintain green space.
2. There are benefitsd for the general area of Banff/Macduff but
this is the right idea in the wrong place. 3. My understanding iis
that there is to be a cafe, pertol station and car wash as well as
the supermarket. The Canal Park is directly opposite the Spotty
Bag shop whose owner has spent a lot of money over recent
Response
competitive tendering process which the council is obliged to comply
with.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design and
the application. The council and Morrison’s aware of the need for any
development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to be
prohibitive to development.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered any future planning application.
We have asked Morrisons as the proposed store operator to provide
their opinion and they estimate that as they prepare more food on site
than its competitors, this results in a higher ratio of job creation to sales
floor space, therefore 150-175 jobs could be created at this location.
The proposal relates specifically to the proposed sale of Common Good
Land to Morrisons as the preferred bidder for the site.
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
8
ID
363027
Respondent
Name
Kim Adams
Representation
Response
times expanding and upgrading, which includes a cafe. There
are also a number of other cafes close to this propposed new
competitor -eg Baobab in Low Street, The Broekn Fiddle, Wendy
and Mo the street food van whose 'spot' is close by. As well as
those very close by, there are numerous other cafes within
walking distance, all of whom will have faced a very difficult time
during COVID. Is ith either fair or necessary to subject those
small individual businesses to competition from a large
corporation? There are 2 fuel outlets between Banff and Macduff
who seem to fulfill the needs of the local population as does the
car wash outside Banff.This project has the potential to kill off
some of the small businesses and reduce rather than increase
the diversity that makes a town attractive to both residents and
visitors. 4. Macduff is a towm sadly lacking in amenities and this
development could further depress the town. A decent
supermatket in Macduff could kick start other developments,
especailly if it was well served by the buses. The area beside
the new council buildings by Old Gamrie Road could have
potentail. The Canal Park area currently has The Smiddy, a
unique and interesting project. It must be possible to build on
the quality ethos that is engendered by its presence by creating
something along the lines of a crafts centre where local craft, art
and literature practitioners could meet, display, run classes and
provide a focal point for the many talented people in this area
who are working awy in isolation.
Canal park was gifted to the towns , its common good land in a
conservation area. The proposed plans for a supermarket, cafe ,
petrol station are not in keeping with the area. The infrastructure
bid the road has not been taken into consideration & certainly
not the strength of the bridge for the added traffic. What
happens when the bridge has to be replaced
proposal would impact upon access to that.
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes. It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for
other potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. Concerns
around this have been noted and will be included in the report to Area
Committee
The procedures which the Council are required by law to undertake
when considering the sale of common good land are referred to in the
consultation document. Following recommendation from Banff and
Buchan Area Committee the Council will be required to seek approval
from the Court under s.75 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act
1973. Assuming that the Council does proceed with the sale, a Court
would have to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of the sale
before reaching its decision.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
9
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
363036
Lee Gallon
363038
Georgina
Ham
363066
Natalie
chalmers
363097
Private
All for it! About time Banff got a decent supermarket. Only
comment would be it needs to blend in with the landscape so it
doesn’t stand out and ruin the views from round about.
This land was gifted to the people of Banff. It shouldn’t be sold to
a multimillion pound business by Aberdeenshire council who
have the right to allocate funds to anywhere in Aberdeenshire.
This land is meant for use by local citizens and not to be profited
on by the council. Once it is sold, that’s it, it has gone from the
community forever. Macduff has plenty of land available in the
industrial estate and would benefit greatly from more amenities.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered as part of the planning application.
Yes it should be done, we need more supermarkets. I’ve seen
people want it built on Macduff but that would be stupid. Macduff
is smaller. Where as Banff if bigger and traffic has to come
through to get places.
1. A supermarket is a good addition to the town, but at that
location, the main and first focal point of coming into Banff, this
is not the location for such an enterprise. 2. Jobs and choice is
good. 3. The jobs may not be as large as initially thought as the
inevitable loss of jobs from adjacent co-op closure - which has
been seen in other towns. The visual aesthetic of the enterprise
will not be nice. 4. The land should remain green. There are
multitudes of other areas where the supermarket may purchase
land locally.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee
Any sale is subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a
Common Good Order, and obtaining planning consent. Legal terms are
still to be finalised with Morrisons. A planning application will need to
be separately submitted for consideration.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities. This
fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee. There are
no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as the
consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered as part of the planning application. However,
the development involves demolishing the old Bridge Street Community
Centre, which will reduce the look of dereliction in the lower part of the
street and may help stimulate other financial investment and property
owners in the vicinity to make positive changes to their properties.
There may be interest from other enterprises in locating in the same
part of town to take advantage of the increased footfall in this area.
A store of this size will of course create positive and negative impacts
on other businesses and residents in its locality and a full impact
assessment into the impact will need to be undertaken prior to approval
to proceed.
10
ID
Respondent
Name
Agatha
Chrisite
Representation
Response
My view on the proposal - I do not think the canal grounds are
the best to put a Morrison’s in as it will take over Banff’s scenery
taking away a part of the local football teams pitches. As well as
that taking away common grounds for the youths. I do not think
Morrison’s will be very successful on the grounds either as it
meets both competition (Tesco, Co-Op and spotty bag) in a
dense supermarket area. I feel it may be beneficial putting it in
Macduff where the old sangs factory is as it is in a less dense
area of supermarkets. I feel it may do better in macduff as there
are only a few small supermarkets in the area. Therefore that
would make Morrison’s gain more customers.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered as part of the planning application.
Aberdeenshire Council has confirmed Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
(“Morrisons”) as the preferred bidder for the site following an extensive
marketing and selection exercise.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users
363112
Mark
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee
363120
David McKay
363158
Tanya
1. The sale of the land to Morrison’s can only be a good thing
with money from the sale benefiting the community. 2. The
benefits of having a decent supermarket in Banff is a positive
thing, with the creation of potentially up to 175 local jobs,
bringing people in to Banff and Macduff from surrounding areas
which will benefit other retailers and locals not having to travel to
other towns to access a large supermarket. 3. I have no
concerns, this can only be a positive step for Banff and
something that is long overdue. 4. I’m fully behind the plans and
hope to see this approved and underway in the near future,
before we miss out on a great opportunity
There is a big need for a decent supermarket in the area, but
canal park is not the best site. It should be left as it is. The
supermarket in mu opinion would be better on the site of the old
chicken factory/disused council yard ad Duncan st/tannery st. Or
better still put to Macduff either beside sangs at the industrial
estate, or across fron the community centre between the town
and the cemetery.
I’m happy for it to go ahead, a new super market is needed
363107
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes. It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for
other potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
11
ID
363172
Respondent
Name
Catherine
Representation
Response
An Aldi, home bargains or a Lidl would benefit the community
more than a Morriston
Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc (“Morrisons”) is the preferred bidder for
the site following an extensive marketing and selection exercise. It is
noted there has been discussions for other potential retailers, but they
were all offered the opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison were
selected via the competitive tendering process which the council is
obliged to comply with.
Respondent made no comment.
363205
Stanley West
363211
Elsbeth
Harrison
Common ground should not be sold off commercial purposes. It
should be kept for leisure purposes for the community. Banff
and Macduff here are better less disruptive sites available this
development will cause traffic issues on the main route through
Banff. There are already two small supermarkets in this area of
town so in Macduff or heading towards Turriff would be better
locations.
The procedures which the Council are required by law to undertake
when considering the sale of common good land are referred to in the
consultation document. Following recommendation from Banff and
Buchan Area Committee the Council will be required to seek approval
from the Court under s.75 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act
1973. Assuming that the Council does proceed with the sale, a Court
would have to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of the sale
before reaching its decision.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities. This
fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee. There are
no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as the
consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The procedures which the Council are required by law to undertake
when considering the sale of common good land are referred to in the
consultation document. Following recommendation from Banff and
Buchan Area Committee the Council will be required to seek approval
from the Court under s.75 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act
1973. Assuming that the Council does proceed with the sale, a Court
would have to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of the sale
before reaching its decision.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
363212
David
Watson Hood
In principle I do not think the conversion of this community asset
to a private asset is ethical.
I also the site is inappropriate for the proposed development for
several reasons. 1 Aesthetic it will impact a conservation area in
a negative way to the detriment of both tourism and residents. 2
It is in contradiction to the councils own rules for the
conservation area. 3 Parts of the area are prone to flooding a
situation that will only be made worse by increased hard
surfacing. 4 Locating a large retail unit there will inevitably
12
ID
363221
Respondent
Name
Keith
Goodwin
Representation
Response
increase heavy traffic and congestion connected with Banff
bridge. 5 Macduff has an even greater need of a supermarket
and it could be located near the eastern approaches where the
attractiveness of the area has already been destroyed by an
industrial estate. Additional comment: you know all this and I
cannot but wonder what the Council’s motivation can have ever
been in approving the site for a large retail shed type
development of any sort.
which will be considered as part of the planning application. If the
development proceeds it will involve demolishing the old Bridge Street
Community Centre, which will reduce the look of dereliction in the lower
part of the street and may help stimulate other financial investment and
property owners in the vicinity to make positive changes to their
properties. There may be interest from other enterprises in locating in
the same part of town to take advantage of the increased footfall in this
area.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design and
the application. The council and Morrison’s aware of the need for any
development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to be
prohibitive to development.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Unsure about the addition of another petrol station and cafe.
Banff and Macduff failed to support 3 filling stations before, the
one in Macduff at the top that failed still leaves undeveloped
land. Likely to be the same with the Gleaner station on Macduff
and perhaps impact the existing business in Banff. We should
be supporting local cafe businesses who supported us through
the pandemic with takeaways etc... not handing business to a
supermarket. I realise we can’t turn back time but let’s take stock
of reality here. Supermarkets and the internet annihilated our
high streets and keeping money in a prospering Local economy.
Times change but what have we really achieved? The closed
down shops and run down town centres still exist. Undeveloped,
unsold. What do we do with monies gained ? New sports
facilities replacing old existing sports facilities. It seems there’s
no innovation, imagination or motivation to clear up the mess left
A store of this size will of course create positive and negative impacts
on other businesses and residents in its locality. The store has a
potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff. Increased
competition may result in a negative impact on other food, comparison,
café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. If the development was
to proceed then an impact assessment would need to be undertaken.
Assuming the Council does proceed with the sale approved by Banff
and Buchan Area committee, a Court would have to weigh up the
advantages and disadvantages of the sale before reaching its decision.
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes. Assuming the development does proceed it will help keep
expenditure and jobs within the town instead of residents going
elsewhere for supermarket and other shopping. The store is likely to
generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
13
ID
Respondent
Name
363233
Daniel
Edwards
363243
Lorna Clark
363253
David Gault
Representation
Response
behind. Canal park in itself if developed correctly could make a
brilliant place where people could come and socialise. A modern
park, open air pavilion for bands to practice or entertain, art
displays, electric bike hire, roller blade hire, sensory park.
Pedestrian bridge or crossing to the beach area. Then if it is to
be developed to be a supermarket then why not take the money
and do something similar on the town centres. Pedestrianise
Banff Town Centre. Make it something special and not
somewhere to avoid because there’s nothing there. There is too
much land banking going on and no development. You’re
looking at the sale of common good land and once it’s gone it’s
gone. Then choose wisely what to spend the money on....
something perhaps that will always be there and benefit the local
community and FIX up town centres into something new. Here
we are once again ready to grab the one off cash and allow any
future profit to be taken out of the local area. Money which once
through local business would be spent in the local area. Whilst I
live in Portsoy, I shop, eat and get fuel in Banff, and originate
from Macduff. Let’s not make any more eyesores from closed
businesses in the North East of Scotland, let’s start fixing the
mess that’s left behind.
High time this went up for sale. Banff and Macduff are tired and
dying towns. I’d rather travel to Buckie, Huntly, Fraserburgh or
Inverurie for a monthly shop than spend five minutes in that
grotty Tesco on Camellite Street, or get ripped off by the likes of
Co-Op. So it makes sense to let a supermarket invest in the
community. Some thought will need to be put into traffic
management in the area, particularly at the bridge over the
Deveron towards Macduff. It’s clear the bridge is reaching the
end of its life and some means of traffic control may be
necessary.
Overall a good idea because there isn’t a decent supermarket or
fuel station in the area. we travel to Huntly, Buckie for shopping
so this will mean less travel, it will also create jobs in Macduff
and banff
1- I am opposed to the "disposal" of the Canal Park and
pavillion. 2- I see no benefits whatsoever to the proposed sale
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be
dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and
may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
14
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
as it stands.The former community centre property and tennis
courts which are redundant, are in need of redevelopement.The
green space of the Canal Park is not. 3 - In principle I have no
issues with the proposal, investigating forward thinking plans for
things that will be of benefit to the town is good thing. As it
stands however this particular proposal falls short of that and
should, in my view, be rejected becauseAny desire which exists for yet another supermarket in the town
, is far out-weighed by, the threat such a developement poses to
existing businesses. Is there actually a need for another
supermarket in Banff, in these days of car ownership, where I
would hazard a guess that 90% of customers will take a car to
the supermarket, how big an inconvieniece is it really to drive 19
miles to Huntly or 24 miles to Fraserburgh where in both you
have your pick of Asda or Tesco. (I ask this in terms of there
being some parts of the world where people have to walk miles
everyday just to get water) Is there actually a need for another
supermarket in Banff, in these days of online shopping,either
click and collect or delivered straight to your door at your
convienience. The asthetic damage this development would
have on the town, instead of visitors arriving in Banff via the A98
or the A947 being met by a green space and the town opening
up in front of them, they will be met with . . .a car park. The loss
of the Canal Park football pitch and changing facilities, as a
publically available amenity. ( which, in what seems like a
lifetime ago, I have personally availed myself of many times)
The notion that the arrival of another supermarket is going to act
as some form of panacea for all the towns ills is laughable in it's
short sightedness. It will, as a result of existing shops, cafes and
petrol stations being forced to down-size or close altogether,
take money out of the Local economy and place it firmly it into
the (probably tax avoiding) pocket of another big company. 4 You could possibly make a case for something in Macduff as
their is a lack of options there, but we will not get to make that
choice. These supermarkets don't build where it's good for us,
they build where it's best for them and the Canal Park site is it.
They don't care about our community or our towns. All they care
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities, your comments
on this are noted.
The loss of the former community centre and tennis courts have
already been catered for in the 12.5 million pound investment council
already made in new sporting and community facilities in Banff &
MacDuff.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered as part of the planning application. However,
the development involves demolishing the old Bridge Street Community
Centre, which will reduce the look of dereliction in the lower part of the
street and may help stimulate other financial investment and property
owners in the vicinity to make positive changes to their properties.
There may be interest from other enterprises in locating in the same
part of town to take advantage of the increased footfall in this area.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
Your comments in respect of the impact on other businesses are noted
Any new store will provide access for the residents of the Banff/Macduff
area to larger format retail provision and particularly for those in the
town who do not have access to their own transport to visit similar
premises in other towns.A store of this size will of course create positive
and negative impacts on other businesses and residents in its locality.
The store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. If the
15
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
about is the $£$£ in your pocket which they want to place firmly
in theirs. I have just noticed I have made an error in answering
point number 2 of this response, (potential benefits). The
proposed developement could help further stimulate the
seemingly inexorable growth in charity shops, empty shops and
takeaways in what should be our town centre.
development was to proceed then an impact assessment would need to
be undertaken. Assuming the Council does proceed with the sale
approved by Banff and Buchan Area committee, a Court would have to
weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of the sale before
reaching its decision.
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes. Assuming the development does proceed it will help keep
expenditure and jobs within the town instead of residents going
elsewhere for supermarket and other shopping. The store is likely to
generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be
dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and
may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
363254
Kamilla
Herbert
Think it’s a great idea, it will help stop people going further afield
to get their shopping which means more revenue for local shops.
363258
Chris
Barwick
In favour of a new supermarket but not at that location, too
congested already. Other sites in Banff and MacDuff are
available. Keep public land in public ownership.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
16
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
363263
Kieran brucegreen
Due to there being very little green areas around banff that are
useable as football pitches for orginised and unorginised users.
363266
Murray
young
363277
David Souter
Yes this should go ahead banff and macduff plus surrounding
area need this as we all know we lack shops here plus the
benefits could also bring other businesses to the area and
encourage others to come here instead of all the locals going
elsewhere, as for the pitch played plenty of times football their
and I can tell you it is not good to play on and as you all know
the council do not have the money to upgrade the park and why
should they the public got two new sports facilities in banff and
macduff which are first class.also might I say could also
encourage more people to come and live in the area because
we have new shops and good facilities.
Yes I’m against the location as stated by many others it will ruin
such a nice view coming into Banff it will cause too much
congestion on an already congested area and there is a perfect
alternative site within Banff and maybe stop overlooking macduff
and build there also
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Assuming the development goes ahead
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
17
ID
363347
Respondent
Name
Gary mckay
Representation
Its a terrible idea to build a supermarket on canal park. Canal
park gets easily flooded so why build on top of that? We also
have 2 supermarkets plus eastside already. Traffic comgestion
would be a nightmare. Its also the only grass pitch in banff thats
any use for playing games. Where are future generations going
to play? The astroturf costs a fortune and most teams will fold if
thats the only option!
Response
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design and
the application. The council and Morrison’s aware of the need for any
development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to be
prohibitive to development.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Assuming the development goes ahead
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users
363442
Rory
McDermott
I think the canal park should be kept as a football pitch for the
good of the community, I think there is enough shops but not
enough suitable grass pitches
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Assuming the development goes ahead
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
18
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
363450
Lorna
New supermarket in the area is a great idea , it will create more
jobs etc but Canal Park is totally wrong location , a supermarket
on that lovely area will completely spoil it , not to mention traffic
congestion , Banff bridge can’t cope as it is ! Put Morrison’s
somewhere else !!
363547
Robert
Thompson
This land should not be sold for space for a supermarket, there
are many 9ther suitable locations. This should be redeveloped
and give space for the kids of banff and macduff to play
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Assuming the development goes ahead
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
363581
Kieran
Buchan
There is no doubt that Banff is in need of a new supermarket/
additional shops and businesses. However, to take away one of
the only football pitches that is freely available to rent and be
able to afford and not ensure that another is created in its place
is wrong and lacks appropriate foresight into the community.
Currently at the sight of canal park there are 3 shops within 5
mins walking distance who would ultimately lose custom and
who will ultimately have to evaluate whether remaining open is
viable. Thus negatively effecting the amount of different
businesses open to banff and the community. As said at the
beginning of this response I believe that banff is sorely in need
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Assuming the development goes ahead
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users
19
ID
363697
Respondent
Name
Stuart
Representation
of further shops and businesses however there are many areas
of banff that would benefit from a supermarket. For example the
chicken factory location which remains an eye sore for the local
public. Please consider the many people that may be negatively
effected by this decision and not just jump at the chance of
having a major supermarket show interest in the location.
1) This land should not be sold to a super market as it is
common good land and the pavilion should be upgrades along
with the old tennis court turned in to all weather pitches for
football basket ball etc. 2) The main issue is the roads and the
old bridge if this goes through is should go along with a new
Bridge for all the extra traffic. A new bridge is well over due as a
super market can go some where else in front of deveron
terrace or the far side of town the same as fraserburgh. 3) What
about the affect on other food sales shops and existing coffee
shops and clothes shops that will close all because the Council
want a large super market against the wishes of the banff public.
Response
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
Assuming the development goes ahead a Transport Assessment will be
necessary as part of any future planning application. This will involve an
assessment of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network
and will identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in
order to address any additional traffic generated as a result of the
development.
A store of this size will of course create positive and negative impacts
on other businesses and residents in its locality.
363722
Reverend
John
Woodside
Common good land should not be sold off as it was donated t
othe communities of Banff & Macduff for social welfare and
recreational purposes; it should not be offered as an economic
benefit or advantage to Aberdeenshire Council or any business
for purchase. There are other locations in both towns which may
be considered for purchase by Morrison's (Ior any other
supermarket) including the industrial estate on the north eastern
All of your comments have been noted and will be included in the report
to Area Committee.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
20
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
outskirts of Macduff, or on the land vacated by Grampian
Chickens or AD Walker in Banff.
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design and
the application. The council and Morrison’s aware of the need for any
development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to be
prohibitive to development.
363756
Fiona Calder
I do not think that this is a suitable site for a supermarket
development for the reasons listed below. 1 an ugly supermarket
building is not the best view for visitors entering the town.
2 traffic congestion with the narrow Banff bridge. This new
development will result in much more cars and more importantly
big lorries crossing the bridge and wanting to turn right
immediately they cross the bridge. More congestion is a
certainty with vehicles queuing over the bridge. Again, not very
welcoming for visitors and frustrating for locals. 3 flooding
issues. This part of the town suffers from flooding. With new
buildings and tarmaced car park, where will the excess water
go? 4 loss of valuable and tranquil green space in the town. 5
this will be supermarket No 3 for Banff. Surely it should go in
Macduff to even out the services.
363779
Penny
Spruce
It would be good to see some beneficial use for this plot of land,
but I fear that a third large supermarket in that position would
lead to existing businesses suffering, especially the CoOp next
door. Would the other site off Tannery Street not be a better
place for a third supermarket?
364037
Rebecca
Ross
The addition of a decent sized supermarket in Banff would be of
great benefit and would enable me to do my family shopping in
Banff instead of further afield
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
A store of this size will of course create positive and negative impacts
on other businesses and residents in its locality and this will be consider
by Banff and Buchan Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee
21
ID
Representation
Response
364159
Respondent
Name
None
Just totally think this is in so many ways the wrong place for this
supermarket. This green space in town has to be left. No benefit
it going there whatsoever. There is ample more places around
banff and macduff , do we need another cafè and certainly don't
need another filling station .
364172
Gail Predell
364225
Aiden
364253
Wayne
Stewart
I think this is an excellent proposal and will be good for both
towns. Nobody uses these facilities as it is and we desperately
need a new supermarket.
Very good decision to proceed with the sale. A great benefit to
all occupants in the local area who will no longer be ripped off by
the local tesco or be required to travel minimum of 25 miles to
get to large supermarkets. In relation to ground being retained
for football purposes, there is plenty other pitches that can be
utilised within the local area.
Macduff a better and safer location either behind myrus , or
driving range or up at the industrial estate beside tarlair .
Regardless of A new foot bridge between Banff and Macduff if a
new supermarket were to go up in canal park there is high
chance of a death with the amount of traffic and congestion that
would be created from new Morrison’s at canal parks. Safety
first , build it in Macduff . From a Banff loon
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, and which was
last updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee
364657
Ashley Noble
I think it’s a fantastic opportunity and I hope very much for the
sale to go ahead for Morrisons.
There are lots of benefits, creating more employment
opportunities for our local community, bringing more people to
our area which will help smaller businesses as well, not to
mention the huge choice of groceries that Morrison’s will have to
offer and save us from having to do online grocery shopping to
get more choice! I have no issues or concerns with the
proposal. Bridge street community centre is empty and doing
nothing, the pavilion is rarely used apart from the odd football
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee
22
ID
Respondent
Name
Lorraine
Edwards
365966
Jamie
Cumming
Representation
game and used as a changing room but it’s so run down and
looks awful! The tennis courts etc are again not in use so why on
earth would people object to such a fantastic opportunity to our
local towns Banff and Macduff, I hope the sale goes ahead.
I have absolutely no problem with having a bigger and better
supermarket in the area of Banff and Macduff. I do however
have an issue with the selling of this piece of land to Morrisons
or any other Supermarket chain. This piece of land has
remained a green space since the 1800s and only the outskirts
of the land has been developed over the years. The land should
be kept for community use, but developed in such a way that
ALL the community can benefit. Not just football. Yes redevelop
the community centre and other derelict buildings in the town but
leave this piece of ground a green space. I would propose that
using or selling land on the outskirts of either Banff or Macduff
would be a better option all round. Especially the industrial area
of Macduff.
Main benefit would be a greater selection of supermarkets. Has
plans been established to support the other super markets and
the staff that would likely be out of work when the close as foot
fall moves to the new supermarket. My other concern would be
that the supermarket would potentially undercut and put out of
buisness the local suppliers like butcher and bakers along with
the fish mungers. The quality of product these local providers
can supply is established and can be relied upon. What
assurance will there be that Morrison’s will source locally from
farmers to fill the shelves with local products instead of products
that are shipped/flown in from overseas. I try and source my
food as locally as possible to minimise air miles and carbon foot
Response
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, and which last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
The benefits and concerns you have raised are noted. A Retail Impact
Assessment will also be undertaken as part of the process which will
assess the potential benefits and impacts that the development will
have on the town centre and existing retail within Banff. Wm Morrisons
state within their proposal that they are committed to bringing the best
in local and seasonal produce to their customers this is not something
we are able to control.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies as regards mitigation and impact on the environment. The
23
ID
366154
Respondent
Name
Morag
Morrison
366365
Anonymous
366631
Kate
henderson
Representation
Response
print overall and if the smaller suppliers close this would be
much harder to achieve and harder still to hold a much bigger
supermarket to account on failings in this department despite the
lip service towards it. Some supper markets have a much better
history of achieving a locally sourced offering but unfortunately
Morrison’s is not one of them.
Green spaces are vital areas for the community to enjoy and are
priceless for mental and physical health and well-being and
should always be kept for future residents and never sold. I
have seen this happen to may times in England and the
consequences have been very detrimental to the community.
provision of supermarket for residents as opposed to travelling to Huntly
or Elgin could also help reduce carbon footprint.
As a resident of Banff I support the plan. It should benefit the
community by creating local jobs, and making the town centre a
more popular and attractive place. I have no concerns about it,
except that the surrounding roads are not currently suited to
increased traffic flow - narrow bridge, bus route, pedestrians, car
parking on nearby streets.
I have read the consultation and beleive a great deal of work has
gone into the proposed sale to morrisons by Aberdeenshire
Council. The only benefit I feel is the possible 150 Jobs for the
depressed local area. I feel that canal Park was a gift to the
people of Banff and should remain an open green space that is
free for those to use. Not all spaces must be developed, once
any green space is sold it will never again be a place of free
recreation for the public. I understand the money will go to a
public fund but it will never be used to buy another open town
centre piece of land or woodland. It will be gone forever. For that
reason I feel that despite the job opportunities it is the wrong
decision to place a supermarket in this area. I also don't beleive
the Banff Bridge and neighbouring streets have the right
infrastructure to support the lorries. The in store deli, bakery and
fishmongers will take vital business from our own local
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities
and the delivery of Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty
opportunity to continue to provide opportunities to assist health and
wellbeing via sport.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, and which last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact this will have on the town has been noted and will
be included in the report to Area Committee
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, and which last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
A store of this size will of course create positive and negative impacts
on other businesses and residents in its locality and Banff and Buchan
Areas Committee will decide whether or not to proceed with the sale.
24
ID
369525
Respondent
Name
Banff Rovers
Representation
businesses. I saw morrisons closed 2 supermarkets that did not
perform shortly after opening them. An empty building would be
terrible in Banff. I also can see from Facebook comments this is
a hot topic and most people want a lidl or aldi. I know that is not
up for discussion but it should be noted that Banff and macduff
have a large number of households on low incomes. Morrisons
is not a discount supermarket it is more expensive than Asda
and tesco. I very much believe that a huge number of locals will
continue to travel to Buckie, Inverurie and Fraserburgh for their
lidl or aldi shops. I don't think you can underestimate this when
Banff and macduff run 3 (I understand) food banks - its a sad
fact that many families absolutely require these cheaper shops
and not the most expensive big 5 supermarket to be built. I am
sad confirm I am opposed to the development of canal Park
because I want a good supermarket and jobs to flourish but I
feel it is an inappropriate use of the area that belongs entirely as
a green recreational space for the people of Banff.
Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in reference to the Canal Park
consultation on behalf of Banff Rovers FC.
As one of the teams to extensively use the facilities at Canal
Park, we are disappointed to once again see the proposed sale
of common good land to another supermarket namely Wm
Morrison Supermarkets Plc. Whilst we can all see the economic
benefits of investment in this town, there is surely better
locations to be considered for a proposed supermarket in the
area rather than Canal Park. Traffic at Banff Bridge can at times
be problematic and adding a large supermarket into the equation
would only lead to exacerbate the issue. Within short distance of
the proposed location, the area boasts multiple cafés and two
filling stations (one with a drive through car wash), allowing Wm
Morrison Supermarkets Plc to incorporate these into their plans
will surely lead to the demise of other small businesses within
the area further hampering an already dwindling town centre, as
we recover from the COVID19 pandemic helping these small
businesses should be at the forefront of discussion rather than
putting the final nail in their coffin. On a sporting front, an issue
already highlighted is the struggle many teams face in trying to
Response
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
When it comes to traffic a Transport Assessment will be necessary as
part of any future planning application.
This will involve an assessment of the capacity/operation of the existing
transport network and will identify any areas where
intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any additional
traffic generated as a result of the development.
There are positive and negative impacts when it comes to local
businesses such as the store has a potential displacement effect on
other retailers in Banff. Increased competition may result in a negative
impact on other food, comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and
Macduff. However, the store is also likely to generate additional footfall
in the lower Banff area, which is an opportunity for businesses in the
vicinity to build upon. This will be dependent on customer choice,
feeling of value and ease of access and may also improve customer
choice and cost of goods. The loss of the pitch has already been
25
ID
369561
Respondent
Name
Jan Grant
Representation
Response
get a pitch to play on, removal of the facilities at Canal Park will
only lead to increase this issue. The facilities at Canal Park are
also available to be hired at a price accessible to everyone,
removing that could place unsustainable financial pressure on
clubs having to play elsewhere and some may have to fold as a
result. In an era where councils are actively trying to encourage
sport to create a healthier lifestyle surely this goes against that?
All at Banff Rovers FC strongly ask Aberdeenshire Council to
reconsider the proposed plans and come up with a better
alternative that will satisfy the needs of everyone. Kind Regards,
Banff Rovers Chairman
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years.
I think the location is wrong. The gourd should remain a green
space for the community. There is favour for a supermarket but
it is felt that Macduff is in more need for it as there aren't as
many shops in Macduff and a ocation on the outskirts or edge of
town would be more suited. I think that the ground should not
be sold (even leased would be better than sold) as once it's sold
it's gone from the community for good. Morrison's is closing
stores and has hooked up with Amazon,. this is not good for
local shops and worse case scenario we're left with an ugly
empty building. The green space on entry to Banff over the
bridge is a huge asset to the town and brings in tourists. They
don't have to see a supermarket marring the scenery. The site is
on an outstanding conservation area and should be conserved. I
also concerned that traffic to a proposed store would cause a
bottleneck with traffic congestion and Banff bridge could not
cope with more lorries going over it to the supermarket. I think
supermarket should go somewhere else in Banff or Macduff,
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the coordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, and which last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
26
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
there is huge support for a supermarket in Macduff (perhaps
beside the new industrial estate or next to the cemetery, which I
believe is suited to this sort of development in the Local
Development Plan.
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development..
A lease would not be suitable for attracting this kind of commercial
development .
369756
Victoria
McCann
372137
Catherine
Milne
I’m in favour of the sale of the land. Banff is losing Tesco soon
which would leave the two towns with one supermarket. It would
create much needed jobs locally and cater to the locals who
don’t drive and can’t get to a larger shop outwith the towns.
Tourists who may come won’t be put off by a large supermarket,
quite the opposite. Plus an empty field with a derelict building
isn’t quite the draw some seem to think it is.
A supermarket is an easy option, and not a forward thinking one.
More green spaces are what towns need for community and
families including an area for market trading of local crafts.
Grass, trees and a walkway with picnic tables. Supermarket is
too commercial and there are two already. Is shopping really the
only idea ? What about health and fitness. The supermarket will
create more traffic, more noise, both negative.
When I read it I just felt I had to comment we visit Banff regularly
my daughter lives there.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised and the delivery of Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will
ensure plenty opportunity to continue to provide opportunities to assist
health and wellbeing via sport.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, and which last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
27
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
373303
374180
Alan Rogers
Jennifer
Saunders
There is no plan to use any profits from this sale for the
immediate benefit of Banff & Macduff. The likelihood is that the
money will "disappear" into the general Council finances. If it
remains ring fenced it will be idle possibly for decades. There is
little evidence that large supermarkets of this kind bring any
benefits to businesses other than their own. There is plenty of
evidence that original intentions (e.g., supermarket will sell food
only) are soon altered to non-food as well, to the detriment of
similar businesses elsewhere in the area. See Huntly for a
prime example. The supposed under-use of Canal Park
facilities could well be due to neglect & underfunding in the
recent past. The loss of sports ground facilities is not being
made good elsewhere in this application. Finally, on a purely
personal level, I am happy with the ethics of the Co-Op
supermarket on the adjacent land; I am not happy with those of
Morrison or Tesco, and the effects on existing stores may easily
be predicted. Loss of what we have in Banff (choice) will not be
improved when as is almost inevitable, there is only one shop.
I support the sale of Canal Park in Banff to build Morrison’s
Supermarket
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities.
This fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
Assuming the proposal goes ahead Aberdeenshire Council will be
considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the coordination of access by users.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
28
ID
374745
376658
Respondent
Name
Nigel
Saunders
Representation
Response
I’m happy to support all aspects of this proposal.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Hugh
Conway
I object to the sale of common good land for the development of
a supermarket. I do not believe another supermarket site is
necessary in the town and if developed feel it will impact
negatively on other stores and petrol stations. I also believe it
will add to flood risk in the lower town. I feel that the land should
remain as a green area and be enhanced as an entrance way to
the town and an informal outdoor recreation space for everyone
but particularly for younger people.
Morrisons can impact the local businesses in various ways such as the
store can have a potential displacement effect on other retailers in
Banff. Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other
food, comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff.
However, the store is also likely to generate additional footfall in the
lower Banff area, which is an opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to
build upon. This will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value
and ease of access and may also improve customer choice and cost of
goods. Furthermore, the precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to
relevant policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for
the planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design
and the application. The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need
for any development to address flooding issues but do not consider this
to be prohibitive to development. Any planning application will have to
have regard to relevant policies on good design. When it comes to the
loss of the recreation area, the loss of the pitch has already been mostly
dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in
improving community and sporting provision locally to the value of
£12.5 million pounds in recent years. This investment, after
engagement with the community, took the form of new sporting facilities
comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports
Complex in Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring
it to Scottish Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider
community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
29
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
377364
Jacks
Steading
1) I support Aberdeenshire Council in the sale of the land for the
use of a Morrisons Supermarket. 2) The town is in need of a
supermarket which offers a far wider range of merchandise than
is currently available via Tesco and the Co-op stores. I'm often
forced to travel to Buckie or Fraserburgh which is neither
economic nor "green". 3) The lack of a sizeable supermarket
encourages local people to shop elsewhere for many of the
products they can't get locally. 4) The very fact that Morrisons
will invest in the town will elevate the town it in the minds of
individuals, businesses and organisations. 5) With the huge
increase in visitors utilising self-catering accommodation, they
need to be able to shop in a first class store with a
comprehensive range of merchandise right in the area they're
visiting. 6) The presence of a newly constructed store will
encourage visitors from outside the immediate area and will also
show them the heritage, coastline and other attractions on offer
in and around the town and potentially encourage them to
return.
378615
Duncan
Leece
380828
Kieran
Riddell
I am 100% behind the proposal to use the land in this way.
People who live in our community face serious disadvantage
currently in accessing essential shops, and this is all the more of
a problem for those on low incomes or without transport. Aside
from this problem being solved, the new development will create
secure jobs and attract people and money into the town, with all
the benefits that brings. I disagree strongly that this will 'kill'
Banff town centre......its already more or less dead, sadly, and
this may be just the lifeline it needs.
Although the proposals have some benefits I do not think that
canal park is the appropriate place for a new supermarket. It is
one of few locations that hold a full size football pitch in the town
that is readily accessible to the public. Also the fact that it is on
common goodland that was gifted to benefit the people of the
two towns, not benefit a massive company to make a profit and
fill the councils bank account. The banff bridge is currently a
Response
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
30
ID
381324
Respondent
Name
Andrew
Simpson
Representation
Response
bottle neck at busy times as it is and this will only make things
worse. Surely there are better places that a new supermarket
could be situated in or around the two towns. If it is not clear
from the above i strongly reject the proposals and the sale of the
land.
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation. When it comes to
the bridge a Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any
future planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
1 I welcome the possibility of a larger supermarket being based
in the Banff/Macduff area. In particular because: a) it will have
the potential to stem the financial leakage from the area caused
by people visiting other towns, or using home deliveries from the
larger stores, to buy products unavailable locally. This could
also lead to greater local spend in other businesses and
subsequent regeneration. b) Greater choice locally will meet
issues of equity for those who do not have the means to travel to
other towns. With the availability of cheaper ranges, this could
support people on low incomes and help challenge poverty. c)
The new build could improve the appearance of the area parts of
which at the moment are run down d) The football pitch is vastly
under used with only rare evidence of matches being played
there. It is difficult to justify the area as a common asset since it
is used by so few people. If the supermarket does not go ahead
it would be reasonable to hold a public consultation on other
potential uses to increase its benefit to the community. 2
Information on proposals for traffic management of the area
needs to be made public. The Banff Bridge is already a
pressure point and increased traffic could be problematic. This
will also need to take into account pedestrian routes since it is
already very difficult to cross the A98 either at the bridge or on
When it comes to the bridge a Transport Assessment will be necessary
as part of any future planning application. This will involve an
assessment of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network
and will identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in
order to address any additional traffic generated as a result of the
development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. It was also noted there has been discussions for other
potential retailers, but they were all offered the opportunity to offer on
the site and Morrison were selected via the competitive tendering
process which the council is obliged to comply with.
31
ID
Respondent
Name
381665
Jennifer
Johnston
393102
Arnot
Fullerton
395543
R.Menard
396495
Barbara Watt
397345
g clark
397544
JOHN
HAEFNER
Representation
Response
the Canal Park side. 3 It would be useful to explain why the
Canal Park area has been chosen for the development.
Arguments could be put forward to suggest the east side of
Macduff would be better - both to provide investment in Macduff
and easier traffic access. Similarly some people have
suggested the old chicken factory site would be more
appropriate. The reasons behind the proposals would be useful
for the public discussion. 4 Likewise, it would be helpful to know
the reasons/process behind Morrisons being the chosen
supermarket. Some people have been suggesting that Aldi or
Lidl would provide greater choice from Tesco/Co-op. Making
public what is behind Morrisons involvement would be helpful.
No objection as Banff really needs a decent supermarket to stop
trade going to other towns
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Just get on with it and give morrisons the go ahead.We have
been here before with tesco and between them and the council
the residents of Banff and the surrounding area missed out. We
have been waiting years for a decent supermarket. It will provide
much needed jobs. It will keep people here and encourage more
to shop here and hopefully help the small shops in town.
I think that Banff would benefit from the sale of canal park . As
would the hole area
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Hope this will happen , our towns badly need a decent
supermarket, where we can buy all our weekly shop, instead of
travelling 30+ miles, which we shouldn't have been doing under
lockdown!. Will bring much needed employment to the area and
bring more footfall into the town!
this supermarket will be good for the area
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Banff has been waiting a long time for a descent super market
while. Other places Buckie Huntley Keith all moved on banff
which seems to be living in the past has always stalled . Let’s
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
32
ID
397918
Respondent
Name
Mark Wood
Representation
Response
make progress this time by passing something we’ve needed for
a long time
General Exploratory Questions: What is the main driving forces
behind the reason to sell? Is there a substantiated view that the
current provision for grocery shopping in the town and area is to
little? My gut feel would be that the answer is no. Is there a view
that it will 'bring jobs'. If so what are the unemployment statistics
for the town and what would be % improvement be post
development? Gut feel would be that the % increase in jobs
would possibly not be large enough to warrant long term
sacrifice of town green space. In general the entrance to the
town is broadly speaking green, parkland and typically historic
buildings. The nature of the supermarket architecture could be a
material detriment to the towns appearance if not done
sympathetically.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities
As part of Wm Morrisons plc proposals they have indicated that the
development of this site could lead to the creation of around 150 - 175
jobs.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
Any sale will be subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a
Common Good Order, and obtaining planning consent. Legal terms are
still to be finalised with Morrisons.
398168
Stuart France
The town is well due a decent supermarket..many of us travel
out of town to shop Fraserburgh , Huntly.. I do feel I t has to be
made to fit in with its setting .. the land is only 50%used at
present , this been the football pitch .the rest is just looking sad .
but with Duff house grounds and Macduff playing feels we we
are not short of playing fields. I do feel if the land at canal park is
A planning application will need to be separately submitted for
consideration. The design, layout and visual impact of the proposed
store will be considered as part of the planning application process
under which members of the public will have the opportunity to provide
their views once the proposals have been made clear.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies as regards mitigation and impact on the environment. The
33
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
to become a supermarket .. green issues should be met , with
tree planting bushes etc
Absolutely get this built the benefits from having a bigger
supermarket in the town is massive. More jobs higher foot fall.
provision of supermarket for residents as opposed to travelling to Huntly
or Elgin could also help reduce carbon footprint.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
398182
Matthew
smith
398467
APX
Technical
Services
We should be encouraging new small independant businesses
to the area, not using common land to subsidise big
supermarkets new bulid cost so they can under cutocal trade
and force them out of business
It is believed that the store is likely to generate additional footfall in the
lower Banff area, which is an opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to
build upon. This will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value
and ease of access and may also improve customer choice and cost of
goods.
398712
Anon
Was this land not gifted to the town in the past? It’s disgusting if
that’s the case that someone’s dying wishes are being used to
make a quick buck.
399238
D.Bruce
Banff is and has been in dire need of a decent supermarket for
years! Current food shops do not have much to offer and leads
to many people (myself included) leaving the town to go to the
likes of Huntly, Fraserburgh or Elgin to get big food shops putting money out with our local area. The closest Morrisons is
in Peterhead so no doubt a good big supermarket in Banff would
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
Assuming the development goes ahead the sale proceeds will form part
of the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds to be held by
Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people of Banff and
Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future projects
aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities. This fund is
administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee. There are no
proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as the
consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
34
ID
Respondent
Name
402137
Bob Smit
402205
private
citizen
404869
Deveronvale
Community
Football Club
Representation
lead to bringing residents in neighbouring towns in to the Banff.
As for Canal park, due to the previous Tesco deal the football
pitches and facilities have already been replaced both at Banff +
Macduff community sports centres.
What has happened with earlier proposal(s) for a new super
market (by Tesco)?
The petrol station with Morrison Super Market is very attractive
as a price breaker for the population is Banff
A healthy development for Banff and its population in the history
of Banff
NO issues and NO concerns - or additional comments
I am in favour of the proposed sale of the land as I believe it will
bring much needed benefits to banff by way of employment
opportunities during the construction of the site and staff for the
supermarket . A new and hopefully larger supermarket will
attract customers from the town itself and also the surrounding
areas as there are no large supermarkets closer than 20 miles
from Banff and the increased footfall through the town would
also benefit the smaller local businesses that are struggling to
survive with the lack of custom locally since people prefer to
shop in towns with more selection in their supermarkets like
fraserburgh, Inverurie , Huntly and even Elgin. My only concern
with the proposal is that it might not be approved. I truly believe
that banff needs this in order to survive as a living town and not
simply a relic of some imagined past as a minor historical site
which it seems doomed to be relegated to given the existing
projects like the smithy , the pedestrianisation of bridge Street ,
the " renovation of the properties on Bridge street which
although they have some merit fail to meet the public need for
some new life to be injected into the town to bring it up from its
knees and kick start some growth.
Disgrace. There is a supermarket right there in the CO-OP. The
land provides current facilities for young people to partake in
sporting activities, keeping them fit and active...a much needed
requirement following the troubles post Covid! There are no
Response
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee. If
the sale proceeds, the common good fund will be in receipt of a
substantial sum. Tesco withdrew from the previous sale and number of
others across the UK due to commercial pressures they were under
rather than anything specific to this site. The council extracted a
significant capital contribution to allow Tesco to withdraw from previous
deal to sell the site and which was used to partly fund the new sports
and leisure facilities in Banff and Macduff.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
35
ID
404874
Respondent
Name
Steven
Runcie
Representation
Response
alternatives cost wise in the town which would be devastating for
young people and clubs just for a quick buck!
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
There are positives and negatives from this deal when it comes to local
businesses, these include Footfall: the store is likely to generate
additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an opportunity for
businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be dependent on
customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and may also
improve customer choice and cost of goods. Competition: The store has
a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff. Increased
competition may result in a negative impact on other food, comparison,
café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
36
Taking away football pitches for youngsters and also probably
taking trade away from locally owned businesses by replacing
canal park with a supermarket.
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
404884
DeveronVale
Community
football cluv
I feel this ground should be given priority to Deveronvale youths
football. Its a shame thr local grounds are in poor condition or
not big enough. Having a morrions then puts a straight on the
co-op and tesco especially the small shops. The club are having
to pay a fortune so the of astro and if this keeps up thr club will
struggle to carry on running which is a shame as the kids love it.
404905
Nicola
Johnston
I feel the land needs to stay with the community, it’s the only
place 11 a side football can take place.
Response
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
When it comes to the impact on small businesses the store can have a
potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff. Increased
competition may result in a negative impact on other food, comparison,
café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. However, it can also
generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be
dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and
may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
37
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
404920
A.reid
An extra supermarket in a small town that already has 2
supermarkets leading to having no suitable grass pitch for
football is ludicrous
404994
Karen Gray
I am against the proposal to sell. There are very few football
pitches around that are suitable for young ones to play 11aside
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
38
ID
405095
Respondent
Name
Graeme Watt
Representation
Response
football on and it would be a tragedy to lose this facility.
Although I do not live in Banff my son plays football for
Deveronvale Boys Club and the facilities at canal park are very
well used. I can't honestly believe the council would be willing to
sell off this valuable local facility. There are many places that
supermarkets could be built without ravaging valuable facilities
that young folk use. It's very sad that it's even being considered.
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements
to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of
the current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
Football pitch is of great importance to the area. Entrance to
Banff will be extremely deteriorated with the introduction of a
supermarket. Traffic at bridge area is poor as it is.
39
ID
405341
405514
Respondent
Name
Leanne Watt,
Deveronvale
Community
Football Club
Beautiful
Rebel
Representation
Response
I am against the sale of canal park.
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Thank you for your response, your comment is noted.
I do not feel that this land should be sold to another
supermarket. This land is used by sporting clubs such as
deveronvale youth. This land should be use for the common
people, not for the council to profit from and the public to have
no other area to use in comparison. Bringing another
supermarket to the area could potentially be a positive thing but
this area is not a positive area and would be detrimental to the
Co op supermarket and staff and possibly tesco supermarket
and staff. The petrol stations in macduff and banff and to the
numerous local cafés. In this extremely uncertain time during
the covid pandemic many businesses are struggling as it is to
remain open. Our local bakers and butchers have done an
amazing job to help local communities and a new large
supermarket would impact these businesses also. Taking away
more green space within this area will impact wildlife and the
look for the town also. I do not agree that the council should be
selling this common land for a supermarket. Refurb the pavilion
and tennis courts and leave the grass pitch for the people.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
When it comes to local businesses the store has a potential
displacement effect on other retailers in Banff. Increased competition
may result in a negative impact on other food, comparison, café and
petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. However, the store is also likely to
generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon.
This will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of
access and may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
Furthermore, when it comes to wildlife The council undertook an Open
Space Strategy Audit, which was last updated in 2019 and noted that
Banff has a high proportion of accessible open space, at over 60%, so it
is not considered this proposal would have an Environmental impact on
local inhabitants or wildlife.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies as regards mitigation and impact on the environment and
wildlife.
40
ID
Respondent
Name
Diane Laing
Representation
Response
There are other sites that should be considered before selling
this green space to Morrisons. The football clubs are paying
triple the fees to use astro pitches than what is charged at canal
Park. It should be left alone. Why not use the chicken factory
site or macduff industrial estate.
405907
Shelley
Marnoch
I would be very disappointed if the ground was sold to a
supermarket chain. My son plays football for a local under 13s
team and they use the 11 a side pitch regularly. It is my
understanding that there isn't any other decent grass pitches
suitable for 11 a side in the area and to use the local astro
pitches costs the club almost 4 times the price. At a time when
we should be encouraging as much outdoor activity as possible
in young people, I think it is very short-sighted of the council to
consider losing a prime sporting facility.
406199
Irene
Finlayson
1. The site concerned is on Common Good Land which was
bequeathed to the town of Banff in perpetuity for residents to
benefit from open green spaces. Whilst I have no objections to
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Furthermore. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further
improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be
possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by
undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or
community projects may be subject to a separate public consultation to
decide the best use of Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements
to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
405528
41
ID
406516
Respondent
Name
V Geddes
Representation
Response
Morrisons per se, I do object to Common Good Ground being
utilised in this way to be sold off for a supermarket site. It is
located right in the heart of the historic town and would spoil the
whole entrance to Banff from the Bridge side and the vista
viewed. Banff is a historic burgh and such a modern building
with a petrol forecourt would not in any way enhance the towns
architecture one of our redeeming features. 2. The residents of
Banff and Macduff whilst undoubtedly would welcome a larger
retail selection, but certainly not on this site which is in close
proximity to The Coop, Spotty Bag and Tescos. The
employment benefit figures stated for Morrisons would have to
be balanced against the job losses to the other named stores in
close proximity whose business would be severely impacted.
Whilst a higher footfall would result in visitors to a larger store it
is unlikely any other businesses in the town would benefit as has
been seen in Huntly where the town centre has been decimated.
Demolishing the Old Bridge Street Community centre is unlikely
to stimulate any other investment in Bridge Street as it stands,
which is an eyesore. Morrisons concept of a Market Street
approach including cafes, butchers, bakery and fishmongers will
simply kill off these existing businesses within the town, making
the high street even more dismal. 3. A concern is the money
generated from the sale of Common Good Land to Morrisons
would benefit Aberdeenshire Council in that they would utilise
this money towards projects they would plan. Too often
regeneration plans have not materialised fully or been taken on
board by the local community due to a lack of ownership,
consultation or long term sustainability due to lack of funding.
Thus I am not in favour of this proposed sale of Common Good
Ground for the stated purpose.
The proposed area that is under consideration for yet another
supermarket in banff, is a complete waste of green space that is
used well by the community. The lack of playable grass pitches
is a concern for the development of youth teams, forcing the use
of more expensive, less environmentally friendly Astro pitches,
which in turn will probably affect things like fees that parents will
have to endure.
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994.
Both transfer provisions confirm that in administering common good
property the authority must have regard to the interests of the
inhabitants of the area. As part of the Council’s responsibility to
Common Good, it must consider use of assets in addition to maintaining
the historical aspect. It is understood this can often be difficult to
reconcile but sale is considered to be best use of this asset for the
inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
It is noted that store has a potential displacement effect on other
retailers in Banff. Increased competition may result in a negative
impact on other food, comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and
Macduff.
Assuming the development goes ahead the sale proceeds will form part
of the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds to be held by
Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people of Banff and
Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future projects
aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities.
This fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
42
ID
406682
Respondent
Name
Matthew
Watt
Representation
Response
There are other areas in the town, or more so nearby Macduff
that would benefit from having a supermarket on its doorstep
(eg. industrial estate on Old Gamrie Road).
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements
to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
Furthermore, it is noted there has been publicity around discussions for
other potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy . Despite the high level of provision, the
review noted, and the council is aware of a number of challenges which
impact on the local sport network’s ability to meet high levels of demand
at peak times and improvement action will need to be considered to
address this. This consultation will help inform the consideration of what
improvements and mitigation could be delivered, albeit it does not
necessarily need to be restricted to those contemplated in the pitch
review.
Overall, the loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. However, assuming the development goes
ahead Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
43
The loss of this greenspace, specifically the football pitch would
be a huge loss to the wider community. A number of football
games take place at the same time, so all space is required at
certain times of the week. The loss of this area would have a
detrimental impact on youth football within Banff. There does not
appear to be a feasibility study to look at alternative options for
the site. Furthermore, the site is not allocated in the current or
forthcoming local development plan for development, in fact it is
protected under the Banff Conservation Area. The addition of
another supermarket in this area will further exacerbate the
problems of retail within the core of the town.
ID
Respondent
Name
407141
Stephen
Wiseman
407265
Lynne
Webster
Representation
I think the land should be used to benefit the community , now
and for generations to come.
By retaing canal park as a sports facility,community hub, and not
to be used as land for a supermarket.
As there is already 2 supermarkets next to it, how many
supermarkets can that area of banff support ? If morrisons
build a new one 1 or both supermarkets in the area would
probably close
I am disappointed that Aberdeenshire Council is selling the
Canal Park ground when it is regularly, many times a week,
used by the children of Banff, Macduff and surrounding areas to
facilitate their football. Seems to be a move to make money from
all angles as the council will gain more revenue by charging
extortionate prices for the use of other sporting facilities. I also
think having Morrison’s located so close to the existing co-op will
have a detrimental effect to the existing store based at that
location. By having Morrison’s at this location it will increase
traffic flow to an already busy area of Banff that sees congestion
during football matches and due to the popular Spotty Bag
Shop. This is a green space that should be developed for use by
children and the super market can use the current eye sore that
used to be the chicken factory.
Response
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
If the development goes ahead, it will use currently undeveloped land
allocated for commercial retail use in Banff for its intended commercial
purposes. The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already
been established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
The store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. However,
the store is also likely to generate additional footfall in the lower Banff
area, which is an opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon.
This will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of
access and may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
44
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
411292
Deveronvale
youth
Don’t think it’s the right place for a supermarket, Banff needs
the football pitches for the many clubs that use the canal park.
411312
Katy
Davidson
This is terribly sad news news for the Deveronvale football
community. Canal park is an essential playing field for our
children’s football development. We need to save canal park
with the best interests of our children’s welfare & future in
football. I am actually from Buckie & travel to Banff for both of
Response
Common Good money. When it comes to local businesses the store
has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. However,
the store is also likely to generate additional footfall in the lower Banff
area, which is an opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon.
This will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of
access and may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
When it comes to traffic a Transport Assessment will be necessary as
part of any future planning application. This will involve an assessment
of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will
identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to
address any additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
45
ID
411325
Respondent
Name
Jillian
McBain
Representation
Response
my sons football training at Deveronvale because of its high
standards that they didn’t have closer to home in Buckie. We
can’t lose canal park. ⚽️
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted the proposal has a potential displacement effect on other
retailers in Banff. Increased competition may result in a negative impact
on other food, comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and
Macduff. It is possible that the development will reduce the cost of
grocery, fuel, and other goods to residents by introducing competition.
Residents will have access to an additional retail offering, meaning
travel to other areas is less necessary or not required. People out with
the immediate catchment area may travel to use the supermarket,
bringing additional footfall and potential benefits to other town centre
retail.
A significant number of jobs could be created as a result of this
development, both during construction and in the supermarket’s
operation. Morrisons estimates 150 to 175 jobs for the store’s operation.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
I feel it would be bad for the Area. - the bridge is already
struggling with the traffic as it is. - the view as you enter Banff
would be awful it Morrison’s was allowed to build. - loss of jobs
to the area! How can Tesco & the coop survive? - although
Morrison’s will create jobs others will likely lose jobs. - lack of
football pitches as it is. This sale should not go ahead in my
opinion.
46
ID
411343
Respondent
Name
Mark
Chisholm
Representation
Yes, I don't think this is a good idea. This land eas a gift to the
people of Banff and Macduff. There are two ways I look at it. 1)
what is the land going to be best served as and as many people
over a long term period getting the best use of it. In a time where
mental health and health and wellbeing is of the upmost
importance for children and adults the ground is much more
valuable being used as a football pitch. The view I have for
Morrisons is the town of Banff itself is in major need of cosmetic
surgery and could they not use their multi billion cooperation to
source and redevelop some of the buildings etc in the town that
is laying derelict and decaying which is unsafe and an eyesore
in the town rather than build over a piece of land that is used
most nights and would be used even one if it was invested in
with floodlights or even artificial grass. People use the 'is there
need for a petrol station, supermarket, restaurant' argument and
the answer is Yes, possibly there is just at the right location and
I'm afraid I don't think canal Park is the right location.
Response
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
47
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
411352
R Anderson
Keep the park for the benefit of youngsters playing football and
other activities, do not reduce the greenspace available. Have a
supermarket in Macduff to benefit the people there more than
another supermarket wedged between COOP and Tesco.
The development involves demolishing the old Bridge Street
Community Centre, which will reduce the look of dereliction in the lower
part of the street and may help stimulate other financial investment and
property owners in the vicinity to make positive changes to their
properties. There may be interest from other enterprises in locating in
the same part of town to take advantage of the increased footfall in this
area.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
48
ID
411379
Respondent
Name
Lisa wood
411381
Sarah Lippe
411385
Garry West
Representation
Response
I think this is a good idea and will bring many benefits to the
area including more job opportunities and another choice of
supermarket. We had more sports facilities built which have
areas for use so I feel that overall it is beneficial to the area.
I think that Banff has enough shops like tesco the co-op, mcalls,
the spotty bag shop costcutters and scotmid. Macduff have very
very little but have the space for a Morrisons at the industrial
park where the bowling ally used to be or beside there. I'd be
happy to drive to if I wanted. I feel that the canal park is the only
proper football pitch that I can take my boys to play FOR FREE!
Yes it does need updated and has so much potential. But the
'community' sports centre does not provide for the community its
far too expensive for families to attend and I have 3 children and
2 of them. Love sports. I feel that the ground should be kept for
the people of Banff to use and maybe it would be used more if
the pavilion was up and running again.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Should not be sold for a big supermarket. Will cause huge traffic
problems on an already too busy road. Also will do away with
valuable recreational ground for the kids to play football and
other outdoor sports. There’s plenty more suitable sites on
outskirts of Banff and Macduff that’s more suitable to build a
supermarket
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy .
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Despite the high level of provision, the review noted, and the council is
aware of a number of challenges which impact on the local sport
network’s ability to meet high levels of demand at peak times and
improvement action will need to be considered to address this.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy . The loss of the pitch has already been
49
ID
411389
Respondent
Name
Rob Scott
Deveronvale
Community
Club
Representation
I am against the proposal as I would like to protect the green
area as it stands..I would wish to see an area in Macduff be
utilised as Macduff does not have this supermarket facility...
Response
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Despite the high level of provision, the review noted, and the council is
aware of a number of challenges which impact on the local sport
network’s ability to meet high levels of demand at peak times and
improvement action will need to be considered to address this.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
50
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
411397
Keith Andrew
Johnston
This should be left as the football Pitches, as the pitches at
acedamy are not up to standard they are a disgrace. These
should be left as common town ground
411427
Michael
Legge
I am all for the sale of the land to Morrison’s as the current
supermarkets in this area are not fit for purpose. This
development would greatly enhance the area both in terms of
appearance and the footfall coming to Banff and Macduff. It
should be worth noting however that this is a pitch that is used
regularly by others and the money from the sale should be put
towards a new grass pitch so that everyone can benefit from
this.
411572
Deveronvale
community
football
Ridiculous place for a supermarket to go, this ground is well
used by our footballers. Plenty other places a supermarket could
go
Response
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users.
Consideration of this will form part of the mitigation to address the loss
of the pitch. However, previous investigations and reports have
highlighted the lack
of suitable alternative sites and the significant construction costs for the
site which the council can access, and which costs are likely to be in
excess
of any expected financial receipt from any proposed sale. As noted ,
there will be consideration as part of this consultation towards
improvements or other mitigation for sporting facilities provision.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. There was significant work undertaken on levels of use of the
site and the council are aware of the current and previous usage which
was used to develop the Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
51
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
411580
Football
I would be pretty upset if it’s sold as the kids love the park
411607
Paul Geddes
No this can’t be sold without being replaced. Used every
weekend for grassroots football
Response
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
52
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
411688
Wayne
Stewart Knowes
Hotel
There are Benefits to having a Morrison’s in the area but the
area you are proposing is not the correct location. Many of these
big stores are on the outskirts of towns but having it plopped in a
common good area/canal park I feel poses a huge health and
safety risk to the general public and will become hugely
congested with traffic. Already we have a Tesco and coop and
spotty bag all in the same area so why place another store
offering the Same or similar service and offering.On the outskirts
of Macduff would be best suited. I also feel there is no grass
facility with changing rooms for all football teams in the area .
We should appreciate the amount of people that football brings
to the local area using many local shops, cafes, restaurants. Yes
I believe having a Morrison would also draw in people but the
location your proposing is not suitable and would be a eye sore
for the town and lovely seaside we have on show. Preferred
location would be Macduff. Councillors need to look at the bigger
picture and not just look at Banff for everything.
Feel free to pop take a interest in football and pop down to see
the canal park being used on a regular basis.
411803
Callum F
Canal park is a great grass pitch which we dont have alot of
now.
411989
Sarah Ritchie
Common Good land should not be sold, as it was gifted to the
people of Banff. The position is wrong for another supermarket.
It is way too close to the existing Tesco and Coop. There are
other, less controversial sites available ie. the old chicken
factory site.
Response
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
There is no evidence that supermarket would impact on tourist activity
as the site was not used for visitors to the area.
Access to a supermarket as opposed to having to go to Huntly or Elgin
could also assist in keeping visitors in town.
The development will have a visual impact on the entrance to Banff,
which will be considered as part of the design discussions for the
planning application.
Aberdeenshire Council carried out a review of its Pitch Strategy,
including capacity in the towns of Banff and Macduff, which identified
there is sufficient capacity
As noted in the consultation there will be consideration as part of the
decision-making process towards improvements or other mitigation for
sporting facilities provision.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
53
ID
Respondent
Name
412054
Heather
Henderson
412216
Patricia
Seligman
Representation
1-we have sufficient supermarkets in Banff. Putting one in
between two is ridiculous. It will run what we have into the
ground and cause people to lose jobs. The spotty bag shop has
a cafe as well as lots of other small locals. We do not need a
supermarket with one. We do not need a supermarket with a
butchery-we are lucky enough to still have a family run butcher.
We do not need a supermarket with a fuel station. We have one
in Banff and one in Macduff. This is sufficient and anymore will
probably cause Macduff fuel station to close. Again more
job/income loss. A new supermarket will “create” some jobs-yes
but will do more damage in the long run. I am against building
another supermarket. Local teams use this ground. The council
should be looking for more community based groups/projects for
this land. Keeping it local.
I am NOT in favour of the sale of any part of the Canal Park. this
is part of the Conservation Area and is not in line with the local
development plan. I am also concerned about the impact of any
Supermarket on existing shops and businesses. This ground
was gifted to the towns of Banff and Macduff for the benefit of
the people of those towns, particularly for leisure and recreation.
. If ever there has been a year, when the benefits of green space
have been shown to be of huge value, it is the year we have just
lived through. Once this area goes under concrete, it will be lost
forever. I have been at a number of Historic Burgh conferences
and other seminars and have learned that tacking a supermarket
on the outskirts of a town, never leads to the regeneration of the
town centre, as is demonstrated by a number of local towns.
Surely something more imaginative could be achieved by using
Response
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities, your comments
on this and impact on local businesses are noted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
54
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
this area of ground for leisure pursuits. This area is in constant
use by the people of Banff and Macduff for sporting activity.
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
Aberdeenshire Council carried out a review of its Pitch Strategy,
including capacity in the towns of Banff and Macduff, which identified
there is sufficient capacity. (
Identification of key issues impacting on usage of outdoor areas in each
area and the development of a potential strategy for every network’.
The review concluded that Banff & Macduff is well provided for in terms
of volume of spaces which can be used for sport and can cater for a
wide range of sports (including athletics). Due to the high number of all55
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
weather pitches available, it is well equipped to cater for sport in the
winter months when demand is at its peak.
Despite the high level of provision, the review noted, and the council is
aware of a number of challenges which impact on the local sport
network’s ability to meet high levels of demand at peak times and, as
noted above, improvement action will need to be considered to address
this.
This consultation will help inform the consideration of what
improvements and mitigation could be delivered, albeit it does not
necessarily need to be restricted to those contemplated in the pitch
review.
Improvements, mitigations, or projects other than those noted in the
pitch review will also be considered, provided they meet the council’s
Common Good Policy, if common good funds were to be used, and the
relevant financial policies and regulations.
412307
Stuart Barrie
I acknowledge that Banff and the surrounding areas require
more supermarket(s) as what's currently available is woefully
inadequate for the catchment area but think that there are much
better options primarily on the outskirts of Macduff for siting the
shop as I don't think that land designated for the common good
of the local people should be sold off. The football pitch that's
there is the only decent one in the area that complies with
required regulations for playing 11 a side games, I also think it's
unfair to force local clubs to use the astro pitches at a vastly
higher rate.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
56
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
412379
Jacqueline
Henderson
With the lack of recreational facilities for groups to utilise it would
be disappointing to see cana park sold for a supermarket
412432
Alan & Anne
Rogers
Past experience suggests that large developments of this kind
invariably have detrimental impacts on other local shopping
outlets (see Huntly, Elgin, Buckie). Traffic needs to be
considered; there is no way that the Bridge St/A98 junction
adjacent to the bridge could cope without lights or a roundabout.
Canal Park is the wrong place for this sort of development.
Canal Park is for the common good, a Morrison's supermarket is
principally for the good of Morrison's & their shareholders.
There is nothing in the proposal which looks to be offering
anything equivalent to the admittedly under-used facilities
available at present in Canal Park.
Banff is an historic town & what is there already by way of larger
retail fits adequately into the town. We do not need another
large shed with matching car park. Any presumed extra visitors
Response
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
57
ID
Respondent
Name
412467
Stork
412435
Stephen M
Eckersley
Representation
Response
to a big supermarket will almost certainly be there because of
Morrison's, not because they want to visit the shops on Low
Street or struggling on High Street.
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
and these will be included in the report to Area Committee
Respondent made no comment.
I find this unbelievable that the council can ignore historical
documents that state the area was left(Bequethed) to the people
of Banff ( By The Earl of Fife?) and not the council to do with it
as they please. The council are their to administrate its use.
They do not own it and have no right to sell what they do not
own. TO remove the field from its current use is outrageous and
shows a lack of support from councillors for young people in the
area.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
58
ID
Respondent
Name
412538
Gillian Milne
412679
Corrie
Murray
Alexis
Sivewright
412700
Representation
The proposal of a supermarket on this site will be a huge loss to
the football community in which a lot of youngsters are a part of.
The importance of getting our youngsters outside and being part
of a group/community is of even more relevance now with
mental health being at the forefront of their development.
Why do the council think that this is ok to sell on common good
land to a supermarket l? We have two perfectly good
supermarkets that would be situated on either side of proposed
new building. It in no way is benefitting to the town and would
take away from some of our smaller businesses. Another cafe is
not required nor is another petrol station. We have two perfectly
adequate petrol stations on either side of the bridge. All this
supermarket would bring us more empty disused buildings that
shall end up going to rack and ruin, which is already a big
concern within the two towns. It’s a very poorly thought out idea.
Many clubs use Canal Park for training and its extremely cost
effective rather than the new sport’s centres which are extremely
expensive to use. The pavilion granted needs some minor work
carried out on it however once done and kept and reasonable
costs for the public this would be used much more often, lack of
information on whom to get in touch with to use the land or the
Response
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
Respondent made no comment.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
Efforts will be made to accommodate clubs/groups sporting
requirements in the most appropriate and affordable way.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
59
ID
Respondent
Name
412703
Rachael
Brown
412711
Lyndsey
Sinclair
Representation
Response
pavilion is a main reason that it’s not used to such a high
potential. It’s the people’s land and should be used by the
people. We have a beautiful coastal view from this spot and from
many surrounding homes and businesses including our
business, that enjoy the view, however erecting a giant eyesore
supermarket will ruin such a view to residents. The congestion
from vehicles if a supermarket was placed here would be
astronomical including HGV vehicles, this also raises concerns
for the Bridge connecting the two towns. With already having
concerns to the weight baring and stability of the bridge having
excess vehicles especially HGV’s this would be a further issue
to be dealt with. All in all I can see absolutely no reason why the
good land of canal park should be sold and not used to the high
potential of green space for the community and surrounding
areas. This land can be used for something so much better,
meaning full and useful than a supermarket!
Traffic Congestion, Eyesore, Overuse of bridge
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development. Any planning
application will have to have regard to relevant policies and Historic
Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning applications and,
listed or conservation consent.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
and these will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
I think that building another supermarket on good football
pitches is a bad idea. There are lots of kids in the area and they
are having more and more areas for activities taken away. There
is already a shortage of decent football pitches in Banff and
Macduff.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Assuming the development goes ahead
60
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
412715
Graham
Sinclair
I think building a supermarket in the proposed location (canal
park Banff) is a very bad idea. The grounds at canal park are
well used by all of the local football teams, adults and juniors.
412737
Sophie Gair
I'm all for new shops in the area. But canal Park is not the place
for it. It's a green space that is very muchly so in use by the
community.
Response
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy The loss of the pitch has already been
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years. Assuming the
development goes ahead Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Assuming the development goes ahead
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
61
ID
Respondent
Name
413205
Dugald
MacDougall
413347
Derek Priest
413362
Claire Batty
CB Coaching
Representation
I fail to see how the sale of Canal Park to supermarket
developers is to the benefit of the Banff and the surrounding
communities. The area is already adequately served by two
supermarkets in the direct vicinity of the site with Co-op
immediately adjacent and Tesco 200m further round the corner.
Plans include the creation of a fuel station which lacks foresight
given the drive towards carbon neutral transport / electric
powered vehicles. It does not take a crystal ball to see that this
will also render existing local/family businesses uncompetitive,
and will lead to forecourt closure / the creation of a new derelict
site elsewhere in the vicinity (Union Road filling station). A
commercial site of this nature will increase congestion in an
already busy area. Any desired infrastructure improvements to
compensate for this additional traffic will be sorely expensive /
severely hampered by the bridgeworks required to improve
access from MacDuff across the river Deveron.
Furthermore the construction of a supermarket at the river
mouth will further damage the visual asthetics of a market town
and detract from its appeal to tourists. Surely a better site for a
large supermarket can be found on the outskirts of the town
either on the A98 or A947 approach roads, with development of
the existing Canal Park site to parkland or improvement of
existing sport facilities being to the greater the benefit of local
communities health and mental well-being.
There are plenty football pitches at the academy which never
appear to be used. I understood that when the Tesco proposal
collapsed there was still appropriate new facilities provided.
Terrible idea, this is used by many football clubs for training and
games
Response
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
and these will be included in the report to Area Committee
Your understanding is correct. The loss of the pitch has mostly been
dealt with, as following the collapse of the Tesco deal, Aberdeenshire
Council has made significant investment in improving community and
sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million pounds in recent
years. This investment, after engagement with the community, took the
form of new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex
in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including
improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football
Association standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
62
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
413366
Troy Bruce
Yes, I strongly advise Aberdeenshire Council not to sell the land.
The land is much more than just land. It is a home to many
football teams and ultimately a place where many locals have
great memories.
413405
Kenny grant
413500
John Milne
I am against the sale to morrisons. When you drive across the
bridge one of the first things you see is canal park then
Princess Royal to the right and to the left is duff House Royal
golf course. To put up a concrete building there to me is totally
wrong regardless which supermarket it is. There would be so
much more heavy traffic on a daily basis from heavy goods
lorries to cars and would cause more havoc to banff bridge .
Then you have airlie garden residents the disruption it could
cause to them. Would be herendous.
I don't see how putting in a supermarket would be an
advantage to taking more tourists to Banff.
There are 2 petrol stations between macduff and banff so we
don't need any more petrol stations here and there are plenty
cafe pubs serving food so we don't need another cafe. Canal
Park itself hosts many football teams from the youngsters right
through to adults. I think it would be a shame to spoil our lovely
views to put up a large concrete building
I think the proposal for a supermarket is in the wrong area.
Green space in the town is limited. I do however think a
supermarket in Macduff is a better idea
Response
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
Aberdeenshire Council carried out a review of its Pitch Strategy, the
Live Life Aberdeenshire Pitch and Open Space Strategy, including
capacity in the towns of Banff and Macduff, which identified there is
sufficient capacity
(http://committeesinternal.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/Committees.asp
x?commid=2&meetid=19225).
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary this will involve an
assessment of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network
and will identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in
order to address any additional traffic generated as a result of the
development.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
and these will be included in the report to Area Committee
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
63
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
413502
Macduff Afc
I think this is a horrible idea. With only two grass pitches in the
local area at an affordable cost for local teams to use. Astro turf
pitches at this current time are just too expensive to use week in
week out
413539
Shona
Stephen concerned
resident
413785
Rebecca
Edwards
I dont think the land should be sold to a Supermarket which
would be better situated at Macduff Industrial Estate where there
is sufficient room for one with parking and also give the
residents of Macduff their own supermarket. The land is
routinely used by local clubs which is good for their health and
well-being and gives young people in the area an outlet to run
off their energy at a fraction of the cost it would be for them to
play on other council properties ie astroturf which many clubs
cannot afford. Also it would is much more appealing to the eye
to see green grass than concrete buildings as you come into
Banff - in Macduff it would not be in your direct line of vision
coming into the town and so not deter from the look of the area.
As it is common good land should it not be freely accessible for
all the people of Banff and the surrounding area for recreation
purposes as it was originally intended. I do agree that Banff and
Macduff need a larger Supermarket and would be delighted if
one was built at Macduff Indust Estate
This is not a good idea as Banff need the 11 aside pitch at Canal
Park. The Astro costs teams more to rent and there are many
Response
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users
Any clubs/groups directly affected by the development will be
accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff. Demand will dictate the
availability of space and time at these sites and collaboration will be
required, especially at peak times. The Pitch Strategy supports the
creation of pitch forums, with representatives from all user groups, local
sports hubs, landscape services, and third-party owners of sports sites
Despite the high level of provision, the review noted, and the council is
aware of a number of challenges which impact on the local sport
network’s ability to meet high levels of demand at peak times and
improvement action will need to be considered to address this.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
64
ID
414404
414452
Respondent
Name
Astrazeneca
Shareholder
James
Waples
414813
Deanna
McSorley
414886
Karen
Oldman
Representation
Response
teams already using the Astro so the pitch at Canal Park needs
to be used. My son is moving up to 11 aside football this
summer at Deveronvale Community Football Club and they
have 2 teams which will need to find pitches on a Sunday
morning.
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere
by undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any clubs/groups directly affected by the development will be
accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff. Demand will dictate the
availability of space and time at these sites and collaboration will be
required, especially at peak times. The Pitch Strategy supports the
creation of pitch forums, with representatives from all user groups, local
sports hubs, landscape services, and third-party owners of sports sites.
This consultation will help inform the consideration of what
improvements and mitigation could be delivered, albeit it does not
necessarily need to be restricted to those contemplated in the pitch
review. Improvements, mitigations, or projects other than those noted
in the pitch review will also be considered, provided they meet the
council’s Common Good Policy, if common good funds were to be
used, and the relevant financial policies and regulations.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee
This would be very good and it should be done ASAP.
Sooner we have a decent supermarket the better. One benefit of
the sale would be the whole area around the football park being
used not just the area for football. The only area of concern is
that another area is provided for football at least as good as the
present area. New business and jobs are essential for the
growth of the town
I am all for the Morrisons at Canal Park. An affordable
supermarket, will provide jobs, save me money not having to
travel to elgin for my main shop. I think it will be great for the
community
It seems a shame that an area used for active sports and the
only remaining grass pitch at amateur level is proposed to be
sold on. Surely a solution could be sought to look at the
alternatives available to these groups who currently frequent the
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that. The loss of the pitch
65
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
facility. Encouraging youngsters to engage in these energetic
activities is not only beneficial to their physical health but also
contributes to their social aspects of life positively and their
mental health and well-being. Taking this away will lead to
community detriment of these positive things. I agree that we do
require a supermarket that can satisfy the locals shopping needs
rather than having to travel out with the area, but the location of
the proposed supermarket is wrong on many levels as
previously mentioned.
has already been mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has
made significant investment in improving community and sporting
provision locally to the value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any clubs/groups
directly affected by the development will be accommodated at a site in
Banff or Macduff. Demand will dictate the availability of space and time
at these sites and collaboration will be required, especially at peak
times. The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and
wellbeing is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport.
The Pitch Strategy supports the creation of pitch forums, with
representatives from all user groups, local sports hubs, landscape
services, and third-party owners of sports sites.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
415127
Anne leitch
The roads in that area are busy enough without adding extra
pressure. Too many supermarkets within a very small area. Ok,
cheaper petrol, but the local filling stations would be made
extinct.The football field attracts lots of visitors to watch the
football when there is a game arranged, of which, there are
many.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is possible that the development will reduce the cost of grocery, fuel,
and other goods to residents by introducing
competition. Residents will have access to an additional retail offering,
meaning travel to other areas is
less necessary or not required. People out with the immediate
66
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
415220
colin bruce
it’s the people’s land not the council’s
415221
Wendy
Alexander
This area of land is regularly used for the young and inspiring
local football teams. Therefore, I strongly oppose to this land
being sold to Morrisons for a supermarket. There are other
areas of land around the towns of Banff and Macduff for these
purposes. The traffic congestion caused by a large supermarket
being built on this ground would be detrimental to the town.
Please re-think this suggestion.
Response
catchment area may travel to use the supermarket, bringing additional
footfall and potential benefits to other town centre retail.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that. The loss of the pitch
has already been mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has
made significant investment in improving community and sporting
provision locally to the value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any clubs/groups directly affected
by the development will be accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff.
Demand will dictate the availability of space and time at these sites and
collaboration will be required, especially at peak times.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport.
67
ID
415319
415513
Respondent
Name
John Calder
Mikey
robertson
Representation
Canal Park is currently used quite extensively by community
sports groups. This is an important part of the community and
should NOT BE SOLD.
A lot of the youth and community will loose out if this land is
sold.
Football is the biggest sport in the area, canal park is a big part
of a lot of the football organisations in the area and would be a
huge loss if this was to go. There is surely more suited places
for a supermarket than directly next to another supermarket and
Response
The Pitch Strategy supports the creation of pitch forums, with
representatives from all user groups, local sports hubs, landscape
services, and third-party owners of sports sites.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy. The loss of the pitch has already been
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any clubs/groups directly affected
by the development will be accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff.
Demand will dictate the availability of space and time at these sites and
collaboration will be required, especially at peak times. The benefit of
access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing is recognised
but previous new facilities and the delivery of Aberdeenshire Pitch
Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue to provide
opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport.
The Pitch Strategy supports the creation of pitch forums, with
representatives from all user groups, local sports hubs, landscape
services, and third-party owners of sports sites.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy. The loss of the pitch has already been
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years.
68
ID
415521
Respondent
Name
Walter
Robertson
Representation
Response
across from the spotty bag shop and Tesco and you would be
getting rid of a vital part of the football community which will
complicate things even more for the football clubs around. Then
the clubs will ultimately end up putting up their fees which a lot
of families won’t be able to afford and a lot of children will loose
out. Let’s face it what else is there in the Banff and MacDuff area
for the children and youths?
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any clubs/groups
directly affected by the development will be accommodated at a site in
Banff or Macduff. Demand will dictate the availability of space and time
at these sites and collaboration will be required, especially at peak
times. The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and
wellbeing is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. .The
Pitch Strategy supports the creation of pitch forums, with
representatives from all user groups, local sports hubs, landscape
services, and third-party owners of sports sites.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy. The loss of the pitch has already been
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the co69
While there is a clear need for enhanced shopping the proposed
site is not appropriate because of A . Established use as a
sports field with regular demand B. The site is situated within
our major conservation area and previous buildings have been
constructed that are less than sympathetic to the surroundings
C. From an environmental perspective the entry to the town from
the bridge would be ruined.The golf course on one side and the
Canal Park and Princess Royal Park running parallel to the
“New Road” we have an open and welcoming entry to the town.
D. Traffic flow would be problematic without major
investmentent.
ID
415602
Respondent
Name
Private
individual
Representation
Canal Park should remain as a recreational area. Selling it to
Morrison’s is def not the way fwd. Who knows what they could
do with this land once they’ve finished with it. Once it’s sold, the
council might not have much say in the matter The roads by the
bridge are chaotic enough already. The Coop is right there and
Tesco round the corner. Banff doesn’t need more in this area.
Developing the land further to include other sporting
opportunities would be MUCH better.....and healthier
Response
ordination of access by users. Any clubs/groups directly affected by the
development will be accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff.
Demand will dictate the availability of space and time at these sites and
collaboration will be required, especially at peak times. The benefit of
access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing is recognised
but previous new facilities and the delivery of Aberdeenshire Pitch
Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue to provide
opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport.
The Pitch Strategy supports the creation of pitch forums, with
representatives from all user groups, local sports hubs, landscape
services, and third-party owners of sports sites.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and , listed or conservation consent.
As noted the precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies as regards mitigation and impact on the environment.
Furthermore, a Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any
future planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy. The loss of the pitch has already been
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
70
ID
Respondent
Name
415614
415701
Representation
Keep canal park add to it more facilities. Supermarket goes to
Macduff. (NAME SECTION CONTAINED - My feeling is canal
park was given to the public to use as they saw fit. Absolutely no
way have you right to sell/donate do anything with it . As for a
supermarket surely in fairness to Macduff and surrounding area
it has to be Macduff .)
Alex
Davidson
Stop the sale of a gifted town asset !
Response
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the coordination of access by users. Any clubs/groups directly affected by the
development will be accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
71
ID
Respondent
Name
415794
Lorraine
Dickson
415939
Community
Council
416205
Kim muir
Representation
I think this would be such a shame on the local children/adults
that use Canal Park not to mention how it would spoil the look of
Banff as you come from the Aberdeen/Fraserburgh side. It really
is something quite special at the moment and the introduction of
what is essentially a big shed will spoil it
Hello As a community councillor I’m appalled at the decision
they’ve made the football pitch is getting used all the time now
apart from Covid!! We need a public meeting to get all views
from the two towns ?!
Don't, it is not the councils to sell. This area is used by the
community, find somewhere else. The old chicken factory, in
macduff by tip...not canal park
Response
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
Due to restriction of Covid it has not been possible to have a public
meeting. There was a press release and notice advertising the
consultation and articles ran by local press on the proposal.
Community Councils and community bodies were all given direct
notification as required by statute and all were asked to bring it to the
attention of all people, they thought should be aware. Representations
have been received in letter as well as email format and the number
received would indicate that the community is fully aware of the
consultation.
The Council has complied with the requirements of the Community
Empowerment Act as far as it was possible to do so due to Covid
restrictions and taken steps to ensure these restrictions did not
prejudice the conduct of the consultation.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
72
ID
416520
Respondent
Name
416614
Brenda
Mathers
Lynn Menard
416999
Liz Lyall
417096
Kathryn &
Izak Verster
Representation
I support the bid
YES. I think the land should be sold. The 2 towns are in
desperate need of regeneration and the option of a new
supermarket is a wonderful way to do this.
I am totally opposed to the proposal. Negative Visual impact.
Traffic congestion. In a flood area, which will be further effected
by removing grass areas and covering them with concrete
thereby reducing the soakaway of rain. The area is very well
used by the local community for sporting activities. Detrimental
effect on Banff.
For several reasons, we do NOT support the sale of said
property. 1.) The character and historical significance of the
surrounding area. We do not believe there is need for a 3rd
super market in an area which is classed as a conservation
area. What is the point of a conservation area if not to conserve
its beauty and minimise development within it? We feel strongly
that building a Morrisons in that particular location will forever
mar the landscape and rob locals and visitors of the
Response
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy. The loss of the pitch has already been
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the coordination of access by users. Any clubs/groups directly affected by the
development will be accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent. SEPA will be
a statutory consultee whose comments will be fed into the design and
the application. The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need for
any development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to
be prohibitive to development.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted.
73
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
incomparable views at the mouth of the Deveron that we so
love, as do many friends and acquaintances who live here or
have had the pleasure of visiting our town. We are especially
concerned over the effect that placement of a large building
would have on the open, sprawling nature of that green area
encompassing Duff House, the golf course, Airlie Gardens, the
Princess Royal grounds and Canal park, and the destruction of
the view of the sea from the Banff Bridge approach road. 2.)
Effect of another super market on smaller, locally owned
businesses, and potentially ruining the livelihoods of local
business owners who have gone above and beyond for
Banff/Macduff and the surrounding area (especially for the past
year). We are all for capitalism and competition but when the
two parties are unfairly mismatched, the locally-owned is always
the one at a severe disadvantage. From our perspective the
consequence of large stores opening in other surrounding towns
(Huntley for example) has been the closing down of many
smaller shops. 3.) Private property values in surrounding area. If
the proposed building did go ahead, will Morrisons offer local
residents and property owners any guarantee that they will keep
this store open in the event that it does not perform at a
standard the company deems acceptable at any point down the
line? If not, we run the risk of being left with another large
abandoned building which will more than likely stand empty, fall
derelict and remain a tremendous eyesore for further
generations. 4.) The current infrastructure of the surrounding
roads and Banff bridge will not easily accommodate the increase
in traffic due to the number of daily customers and supplier
HGV's. A great deal of modification would be absolutely
essential for such an enterprise to move forward efficiently.In the
event that it does, who will pay for the needed infrastructure
investment? Added to this, the project is likely to require
modification of the Banff Bridge (a significant local landmark),
which would taint its beauty. 5.) Increased traffic congestion.
Even with adequate investment in the infrastructure within that
area, the resulting traffic congestion of having a Morrisons in
Canal Park will significantly change traffic patterns and
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies
and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and, listed or conservation consent.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
We note concerns about continued use of the site however any
economic development carries a risk of failure but it is not valid reason
not to proceed.
74
ID
417180
Respondent
Name
F Christie
Representation
accessibility for us local residents and those in the surrounding
area. All this to say, we do not oppose the idea of bringing more
business and job opportunities to Banff/Macduff BUT we are not
in support of achieving that in a manner or at a location that
would undermine and undercut existing local businesses who
have made significant and personal investments to serve our
community and who add to the homely and unique character
that is Banff. We fail to see the benefits that the local community
would gain as a consequence of this venture, outside of job
creation and convenience. For many, the convenience will only
make spending money easier. At the end of the day, it is
predominantly Morrison's who will gain from our community,
instead of vice versa. From our perspective, the potentially
harmful long-term affects far outweigh the short-term benefits we
may gain.
1. The time to build a supermarket in Banff was the early 2000's,
before large supermarkets were built in Huntly, Buckie and
Fraserburgh. These limit the potential influx of people to Banff to
use any supermarket as they have other options locally. The
land could be better used to build something genuinely unique to
Banff - a football training campus or a huge adventure play park
or a drive in cinema, there are a great many 'out of the box'
options which would give a much greater appeal to Banff. 2.
Building a supermarket, particularly one with a 'Market Street'
style would have a significant negative impact on locally owned
businesses in the town. We are lucky to have a locally owned
butcher on our high street, and several locally owned bakers.
We have two petrol stations within a mile radius of the proposed
supermarket. There is a large cafe within The Spotty Bag Shop,
directly opposite the proposed site and several other cafes
throughout the town. All of these are likely to suffer a significant
decrease in footfall as a result of the convenience of a
supermarket. A reduction in profit of these businesses could
potentially result in job losses which would in turn reduce the
positive impact of new jobs created by the supermarket. Should
any shops have to close, this would have a significant negative
impact on the aesthetic appeal of our town as it is unlikely they
Response
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses
and employment, these will be included in the report to Area Committee
75
ID
Respondent
Name
417206
Hazel Daniel
417267
Liz Whyte
417528
Rachael
Brown
Representation
would be filled promptly. 3. Egress from Bridge Road onto the
A98 is already challenging at busy times, often requiring a wait
of several minutes before there is a suitable gap in the traffic,
adding to this traffic would therefore cause significant
congestion. Routing traffic the other way would result in an
increase in traffic through our historic town centre, an area of
significant historic importance which is not suitable for heavy
traffic flow. Any traffic management systems would have an
impact on flow of the A98, a busy road which many people, local
and otherwise, depend on in their daily lives. 4. Canal Park is a
much loved green space within our town. Coming over the
bridge and seeing a vast area of green with children playing
football is an image which stays with visitors to the area that is
often mentioned when I tell people from out with the local area
that I come from Banff. I fail to imagine anyone being delighted
to come over the bridge and see another generic supermarket.
I am supportive of the sale of the land for a supermarket. Banff
and Macduff will benefit from the increase of people coming to
shop in the town which will hopefully have a benefit to the
businesses already in place. I have no issues with the proposal
and if anything would hope that the infrastructure in the area
would be progressed accordingly.
Yes they should sell the land to Morrison’s I believe the area
desperately needs a good supermarket and the surrounding
area would also greatly benefit.
The sale of common good land after a pandemic is a short
sighted economic gain. As we emerge from the global impacts
we need to understand the economic benefits of engaging with
small local providers and create sustainability within a fragile
area. The challenges with the proposal are that the area is
known for it's natural beauty, no supermarket has ever been
credited for bringing tourists into a town, it's local beauty, history
and independant shops that do that. In addition the amount of
pollution that increased traffic would bring would be appalling,
again supermarkets are not credited for bringing people into a
town they bring them through a town. People do not stay in a
local town. There is a very good reason that small towns all over
Response
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff.
Its acknowledged there may be increased traffic but this could be offset
in reduction of traffic currently travelling further afield to other town for
shopping.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses
and employment, these will be included in the report to Area Committee
76
ID
Respondent
Name
417763
Sean
McAngus
417790
Rae
Representation
Europe facing the same economic and social challenges as
Banff and MacDuff are rejecting big supermarkets in favour of
the circular economy and impact that can be created by
shopping local and using local. And lastly the money generated
in a supermarket does not stay in the town, nor does it even stay
in Scotland. We would loose local shops due to displacement
and this is fundamentally wrong. The strategy for success in
Aberdeenshire currently includes engagement and well being,
surely using the assets of a common good land could be put to
more effective long term economic gains. I have huge concerns
that the assets of Banff will be striped and through a short term
financial gain we will have an increase in economic issues and
social challenges. If we are focused in scotland on 'good jobs'
which is the rhetoric from Scottish Government then
supermarkets are not the route forward. Multiple impacts can be
created if tourism, circular economy, inward investment and
skills and talents are exploited. This proposal is not it, I am
100% behind community lead alternatives that generate
economic impacts and social outcomes.
It would be good for the creation of new jobs, make up for the
pending departure of Tesco and hopefully drive more people to
the town to spend their cash in local businesses. My concerns
are the supermarket could do the same as Tesco did by pulling
the plug on new store deal leaving the town . Also would the
football teams that currently play there get facilities to play
elsewhere.
There is little doubt that the Banff area requires a supermarket
that offers a wide range of products, where a weekly shop could
Response
Any sale is subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a
Common Good Order, and obtaining planning consent. Legal terms are
still to be finalised with Morrisons. A planning application will need to be
separately submitted for consideration. this means that there is a
chance that Morrisons may not pursue the purchase of the park. when it
come to the football teams currently using the park, previous
investigations and reports have highlighted the lack of suitable
alternative sites and the significant construction costs for the site which
the council can access, and which costs are likely to be in excess of
any expected financial receipt from any proposed sale. As noted above,
there will be consideration as part of this consultation towards
improvements or other mitigation for sporting facilities provision.
Any clubs/groups directly affected by the development will be
accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff. Demand will dictate the
availability of space and time at these sites and collaboration will be
required, especially at peak times
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
77
ID
Respondent
Name
417827
Jennifer
Liebnitz
(Deveronvale
Football
Club)
1
Anne Plane
2
Mhairi
McKean
Representation
Response
be done and not just a few items to “ get by”. This said the
place for this is not on green land that serves as a sports ground
in an area that represents many sporting activities.Please do not
turn the area into a commercial “dump”. There are alternative
sites- investigate the suitability of those.
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
Efforts will be made to accommodate clubs/groups sporting
requirements in the most appropriate and affordable way.
There is no suggestion of using Common Good funds to fund the
Council’s other statutory responsibilities. The Council has a statutory
obligation to provide certain services and allocation of budgets is
considered considering area needs. Use of Common Good funds for
local projects or to assist in community funding is a competent use of
such funds.
My son plays football with Deveronvale Youth and they regularly
use
Canal Park for both training and matches. It is the only grass
pitch available in Banff/Macduff which is suitable for 11aside
games, if this is lost then the club will have to pay much more
(almost 3 times as much) for the use of Astro facilities. It is
Common Good land and is used by many community groups - I
do not feel that the land being sold by the council to a
supermarket chain is for the good of the community. I have
read with interest that there is potentially going to be an Aldi
store built in Macduff, with this in mind just how many
supermarkets are required in the area, there is already a Coop
and a Tesco in close proximity to the Canal Park site. Will any
money gained by the council through a potential sale be put
back into the community for common good or will it be
swallowed up by Aberdeenshire Council?
Whooppeee, finally a large supermarket and hopefully cheaper
petrol
I am surprised that supermarket plans are not included in the
consultation. Surely we need to know what is to occupy the
space before we express an opinion on the sale of the land.
How the supermarket is to be configured, the layout of the
building, car parks and petrol pumps has a huge bearing on how
the development of this land will be seen.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The consultation relates specifically to the proposed sale of Common
Good Land to Morrisons as the preferred bidder for the site. Any sale is
subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a Common Good
Order, and obtaining planning consent. Legal terms are still to be
finalised with Morrisons.
A planning application will need to be separately submitted for
consideration. The design, layout and visual impact of the proposed
store will be considered as part of the planning application process
under which members of the public will have the opportunity to provide
their views once the proposals have been made clear.
78
ID
Respondent
Name
Stuart
Representation
Response
Are we getting a new bridge at the same time - what is the point
of a super market if the old bridge is closed and you can not get
from the east to shop in it
8
Banff &
Macduff
Community
Council
9
D A Norman
At the Banff and Macduff Community Council meeting on the
28th April 2021 the proposed sale of the land known as Canal
Park Land and the preferred bidder Morrison Supermarket was
discussed. All environmental issues and concerns over the loss
of the green space in a conservation area balanced against
improved retail facilities and job creation was thoroughly
debated. The Community Council took a vote on the proposal
and the result was as follows- 6 members voted for the
proposal, 1 member voted against, with 2 members abstaining,
therefore the proposal was carried. The Banff and Macduff
Community Council therefore confirm their official support for
this proposal. The members of the Public who were present at
the meeting were encouraged to use the on-line consultation
platform to register their views should they wish to make
comments.
If Tesco leaves what happens to the bulding they are in at
present? As we have enough empty properties at the moment.
No objection to Morrisons providing things like parking are
sorted. Will this build be detremental to Spotty Bag? When will
the bridge to sorted out as to the traffic problem?
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
3
The store is likely to generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area,
which is an opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This
will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of
access and may also improve customer choice and cost of goods. The
store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff.
There is no evidence that Tesco will close its store but to have no
development due to impact on existing businesses would ultimately
mean local economy stagnating
When it comes to the bridge a Transport Assessment will be necessary
as part of any future planning application. This will involve an
assessment of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network
and will identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in
order to address any additional traffic generated as a result of the
development.
79
ID
10
11
Respondent
Name
Louise
Roberts
Rebecca
Webster
12
Kathleen
Ross
13
Jessica
Sartain
Representation
Response
Banff and Macduff need a bigger supermarket. New housing
being built when there is no shops. Not a good idea to bring new
people into the town. THE LAND MUST BE SOLD we need a
bigger shop. People can,t always get out further than the town.
Please think about ur residents
Against the Morrison Store. It will spoil the beauty of Banff
losing the green space. It would have a negative affect other
businesses
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
I am not in favour of a Morrisons. This would lead to loss of jobs
for the other established supermarket due to potential closure
thus mor empty buildings in the town. the most 2Community
Good" would have to be faa) Liddles (or Aldi); b) Farm Food (or
Icelnd); c) Homebase. People will still travel to the above stores
part of a "day out2 as well as being much cheaper option (Many
fold have bus concession cards). If eg one of the above A/BC
was given permission to operate there wuld potentailly sill be
room for another store eg. Sports Direct or Poundland. When is
Macduff goig to get a cheaer store as apposed to emty shops
and banks? We don't all have cars or lots???
Hi there, This years Mental Health Awareness Week focussed
on nature and the important role it plays on our mental health.
Utilising personal wellbeing data from the ONS and data
extracted from Open Street Maps, we combined the data to
understand whether living in areas with lots of green space
correlated with less mental health issues. We also correlated
data of the top 10 places in England and Wales with the highest
tree population with some shocking statistics.cThe full study is
viewable here: https://asanalodge.com/uk-green-locations-andanxiety/ • Milton Keynes, Warrington, Peterborough,
Northampton, Stoke-on-Trent, Coventry, Leeds,
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
The store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. Your
comments have been noted and will be considered by Banff and
Buchan Area Committee.
It is noted there has been discussions for other potential retailers, but
they were all offered the opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison
were selected via the competitive tendering process which the council is
obliged to comply with.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
80
ID
Respondent
Name
14
Wendy Mann
15
Ian Brooker
Representation
Wolverhampton, Exeter and Dundee are the greenest areas in
the UK to live, • Those living in the top 10 areas for green areas
suffer less anxiety than the rest of the country, • Living around
green areas does not necessarily mean you’ll be happy, as
those living in the top 10 areas for green space are on average
unhappier than those who don’t, • On average, those who live in
leafier areas are happier than those who do not, • Both residents
of the most green and leafy areas have lower than average life
satisfaction levels meaning that living in these areas does not
bring life satisfaction.
I would like to register my objection to this proposed
development. Canal Park is green space forming part of the
Common Good land gifted to the towns of Banff and Macduff in
1907 and therefore the residents of these places. A commercial
enterprise may bring some benefits but it would also cause more
problems with an increase in traffic flow though the main streets
and across Banff bridge. Surely it would be better to think more
about the historical and environmental impact that retaining this
green space could have if developed for the residents and
visitors rather than as source of income for the council.
Iam an infavour of the roposal. Our Community will benefit from
a modern supermarket. Locating the supermarket at Canal Park
offers the prospect of increaed footfall in the town, and provides
a location centred between Macduff and banff. This area of
Banff is cruffy and development should help improve the
aperance of the town. It may tie in well with redeveloping Bridge
Street for independent retailers. Loss of green space for the
Community recreation is still an issue, despite re-provision of
football, tennis and indoor community facilities. Common Good
land will be lost to the people of Banff and Macudff. I would like
to see provison of new land or enhancement of existing land
Response
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development. Historic
Scotland will be a statutory consultee, any planning application will have
to have regard to relevant policies as regards mitigation and impact on
the environment and wildlife.
If the land is sold the funds received will form part of the Banff &
Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which is
administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit of
the people of Banff and Macduff.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities. This
fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee. There are
no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as the
consultation will help inform any decisions on that. when it comes to
traffic congestion a Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of
any future planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
81
ID
419289
Respondent
Name
Deveronvale
Youth
Development
parent
Representation
Response
providing general recreation space to remedy this loss. This
could be in the form of communiy woodland with pedestrain and
cycle paths. Banff does have esier access to the Canal Park
site and some effort should be made to imrpove pedestrian and
cycle access from Macduff. It would be interesting to know if the
land between Macduf and the river could be developed in some
way to address these issues. If it isn't possible to develop a
community woodland area then developing a total walking trail
from Macduff to Gardenstwon or both. Would be an alternative
green space development with recreational an economic benefit.
Trafic congestion around the bridge will be worse so there may
be a need to reconsider traffic management. A new bridge has
been discused in principle for many years but it seems unlikely
that this will happen.
Concerns regarding the park which is widely used for outdoor
exercise. Only certain parks can be used for 11aside and this is
one. Outdoor exercise for young people is of upmost importance
and access to this needs to be protected
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
82
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
419469
Shona Taylor
I do not support the building of a supermarket at the Canal Park
site. I feel the development is too large and would dominate the
surrounding landscape. Extra traffic would cause more wear and
tear on an already overused Banff Bridge. My children play
football on the pitch, best grass pitch in the area, according to
them.
I feel there are other sites, particularly in Macduff, which would
be better suited for a supermarket development.
419936
Carron
Casado
I object to this proposal. This land has been gifted to Banff for
recreational use and should be used in that spirit. A supermarket
would destroy the aesthetics of the town, making it less
attractive to tourists and to residents. The space could be better
used to benefit the community and attract visitors. For example,
it could be used for a theatre/concert venue with a garden bar,
or a cricket ground with new pavilion which could be hired out for
events such as birthday parties. Furthermore, a large
supermarket would eventually pull business away from the
existing supermarkets, and these building would become
derelict. It would also take business from the High St.
420001
Paul Vigor
420640
Lukasz
No issues with the sale and fully support a much needed
supermarket to our area. It will bring in more people to our area
which will help our town to start thriving again. Also create much
needed employment to the area
Great idea, activities on canal Park was really low, next to
nothing, new supermarket will bring new jobs
Response
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent. A Transport
Assessment will be necessary this will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
There is no evidence that supermarket would impact on tourist activity
as the site was not used for visitors to the area. Access to a
supermarket as opposed to having to go to Huntly or Elgin could also
assist in keeping visitors in town.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
and these will be included in the report to Area Committee
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
83
ID
420777
420785
Respondent
Name
Katie Menard
420975
Lisa
MacLeod
Colin Wood
421281
Jacqueline
422231
J Bloor
422723
Allen l
strickland
423170
Richard
James
Stewart
Representation
Response
I view this as a great expansion for the community and
generating more jobs.
It will create jobs in the local area and create a use for derelict
land.
1. The land is not widely used as is and actually doesn't add
anything to the entrance to the town. It would be more beneficial
being used for the wider community. 2. Competition for
surrounding business, making it fairer for all, increased numbers
travelling to the town will also increase foot fall in local
businesses.
3. Traffic management and the state of the Bridge over the
River Deveron (wholly inadequate) is my only concerns. 4. A
wholly positive development for the community and should have
been completed 15 years ago. People here are so negative to
change, but then moan when they seem to lose out to other
towns. Crack on and go for it!
Excellent ! The town needs jobs and it will be the closest
morrisons for miles. I currently go to Inverurie twice a week just
for morrisons! It will bring people to banff even more! No brainer!
I think this would be a good move on the council’s part
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
When it comes to the bridge a Transport Assessment will be necessary
as part of any future planning application. This will involve an
assessment of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network
and will identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in
order to address any additional traffic generated as a result of the
development.
Selling the land to a Morrisons, or anyone really, willing to invest
in Banff is a winning idea. The area is reaching a critical point of
decay in infrastructure that we have all come to expect. I enjoy
Morrison's stores in other towns (Inverurie and Peterhead) and
believe they can revitalize the downtown of Banff. What do the
people have there now? A tired Tescos and overpriced Co-op..
There will come a tipping point when everyone will do there
shopping in Fraserburgh, Inverurie, even Aberdeen.. all because
there is no real choice or value in shopping in Banff.
I am not a resident of Banff but my son Glen plays for
Deveronvale community football club, so I know how important it
is to have this pitch for the development of our kids as players. It
is very clear in my eyes that the council are only thinking about
the money that will be generated by the sale of the land and not
our kids welfare, if this goes ahead the area will become
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
84
ID
427413
Respondent
Name
Paul Stewart
-Deveronvale
Community
fc
Representation
Response
massively congested due to the huge increase in traffic, noise
and air pollution will also increase. Is this what you want ???
Surely there is land that skirts the town that this development
can take place keeping the traffic and pollution out of Town.
It would not be hard for anyone to make the correct decision on
this proposed development but unfortunately money talks and I
fear the worst.
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
There is no suggestion of using Common Good funds to fund the
Council’s other statutory responsibilities. The Council has a statutory
obligation to provide certain services and allocation of budgets is
considered considering area needs. Use of Common Good funds for
local projects or to assist in community funding is a competent use of
such funds.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Comple x in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
85
Strongly against the sale of canal park to house a supermarket.
Benefits of supermarket in Banff is many and to be clear I am
not against a new supermarket setting up in the area,just not on
canal park as that area is used by hundreds of people a week
and the only grass pitch that is playable and/or meets the 11 a
side guildlines and/or is actually affordable to the many local
clubs who frequent it with the local 4G surfaces over priced and
under maintained. Between every club who uses canal park it
attracts many many people in their hundreds weekly to lower
Banff to not only enjoy the football on offer but to support local
businesses currently in situ,not to mention a fantastic green
ID
434267
Respondent
Name
Naomi
Mason
Representation
Response
space for dog walkers and/or people in general to enjoy
exercise. Also huge concerns over the look it would bring to the
town when crossing the bridge. People in your position
underestimate how much local clubs NEED canal park,people in
your position are ignorant to those needs nor understand what
options there is locally out with the ridiculously over priced 4G
surface that cone complete with shocking services(or lack of)
Every local club needs canal park but Deveron vale community
fc are growing stronger every year and youth teams need the
affordable surface of canal park to house home fixtures and
training. It would be a disaster to lose canal park.
I do not support the proposed sale of Canal Park to Morrisons
supermarket. The town of Banff is unique locally in terms of
listed buildings and its vista. The view you get as you come over
the bridge shows off some of the stunning architecture - a large
Morrisons sign will detract immensely from this. This will be a
deterrent for tourists at a time when attracting Scottish tourists
has never been more important. The bridge and level of traffic
already makes walking and cycling difficult, and with extra lorries
and traffic turning at a bottleneck, this does not seem the most
suitable site for a large supermarket - adding to an already
difficult road area. Furthermore, the site is on a flood plain, and
when the water comes we have already seen damage to the
lower parts of the town. Grass acts as a natural soakaway, I
would be very concerned that the large tarmac and concrete
structure would disperse water across other parts of lower Banff
and cause additional damage. If it is to be sold, I would hope
there could be requests to build in as much natural planting as
possible to alleviate some of the effects. The main reason I do
not support this sale however is that it is for a large supermarket
which will naturally compete unfairly with local independent
businesses. We do not need a 3rd petrol station in the space of
a mile, nor an additional cafe. I appreciate the site has been
zoned for a supermarket for some time (and that in and of itself
is an issue as it happened long before the devastation of large
supermarkets to independent retailers was fully understood), but
the landscape of retail has and is continuing to change. We don't
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
Efforts will be made to accommodate clubs /groups sporting
requirements in the most appropriate and affordable way.
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies
and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and, listed or conservation consent.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on signage, mitigation and impact on the environment.
Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and, listed or conservation consent. A Transport
Assessment will be necessary, this will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address
any additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the planning applications whose
comments will be fed into the design and the application.
There is no evidence that a supermarket would impact on tourist activity
as the site was not used for visitors to the area. Access to a
supermarket as opposed to having to go to Huntly or Elgin could also
assist in keeping visitors in town.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses
86
ID
435323
Respondent
Name
Anne & John
Henderson
Representation
need to go far to see what large supermarkets can do to town
centres. Aberdeenshire Council has a town centre first policy whereby they are meant to be considered at all decisions. And,
thinking about the centre of Banff and Macduff and the butchers,
bakers, cafes and petshop I fear that a large supermarket such
as Morrisons would sound a death knell. I do not think this site
should be sold for a supermarket, and I think if you asked the
people of Banff the question regarding the zoning of the land
again, you would get a different response.
1. We assume the previous agreement regarding common good
land and Tesco, has become nul and void hence the need to go
through the process again. Has a comprehensive survey of
residents' opinions been completed in Banff and Macduff ? As a
local resident living adjacent to the site we would be directly
impacted by such a development and we have not been asked
for our view to date. Our overall view on the disposal is that
provided the benefits of the sale are for the WHOLE community
and that negative impacts on local businesses and residents are
minimal on the whole the sale is acceptable. 2. Some benefits
would accrue from money obtained from the sale. Spent wisely
this would be a good thing. In addition it would provide residents
and visitors with a further choice of retail outlet. There would
also be increased footfall to businesses in Bridge St and
employment opportunities for the twin towns. 3.There is no
detailed planning application as yet in which some of our
concerns might be addressed. Our concerns are as follows:- a)
Visual impact of a large scale modern potentially 'glassy'
supermarket at the entrance to historical and elegant Banff with
its impact on the built heritage on this part of Banff. Design is
very important. b) The site area appears huge and grossly out of
scale with Banff seafront. c) The Protected Banff Old Town wall
requires to be preserved as a historical monument. d)There is a
flood risk at this site. The proposed site is in medium SEPA flood
risk area for coastal and river flooding. With fuel potentially on
site, flooding risks polluting the Deveron estuary and the shore.
The Deveron is an important fishery. e) Impact of deliveries,
access, noise and parking issues impinging on the residential
Response
We can confirm that the previous Tesco deal in respect of this land has
subsided. The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of
the people of Banff and the surrounding area in respect of the proposed
sale of the Common Good Land to Morrisons as the preferred bidder.
The sale of this land is subject to the outcome of the consultation,
securing a Common Good Order, and obtaining planning consent.
Legal terms are still to be finalised with Morrisons. A planning
application will need to be separately submitted for consideration. The
design, layout, nuisance and visual impact of the proposed store will be
considered as part of the planning application process and a proper
Transport Assessment will be undertaken to look at the capacity /
operation of the existing transport network and the interventions /
mitigations that are necessary to address any additional traffic
generated as a result of the development. Members of the public will of
course have the opportunity to comment on the planning application as
soon as the applicants proposals have been made clear. When it
comes to flooding the precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to
relevant policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for
the planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design
and the application. The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need
for any development to address flooding issues but do not consider this
to be prohibitive to development. Furthermore, Any planning
application will have to have regard to relevant policies as regards
mitigation and impact on the environment.
The provision of supermarket for residents as opposed to travelling to
Huntly or Elgin could also help reduce carbon footprint.. A Retail
87
ID
437183
Respondent
Name
Leanne
Cheyne
Representation
Response
nature of Bridge St, Airlie Gardens and Old Market place. f)
Impact on local businesses including Coop, local filling stations,
butcher, baker and Cafes. Spotty Bag is extending it's facilities
so it would appear that the last thing needed would be another
coffee shop in that locale. Additionally, the future of the
petrol/deisel car is limited so another fuel station in the area is
not very Climate Change orientated. Other types of retail or
rental space on the premises might be more useful e.g. soft
play, laundry and dry cleaners, shoe repairs. g) loss of current
amenity for youngsters including 5 aside and full size football
parks. h) increased traffic and parking problems in Old Market
Place and Bridge Road. 4. Timely notification and opportunity
to comment on the planning application would be very helpful.
Impact Assessment will slso be undertaken as part of the process which
will assess the potential benefits and impacts that the development will
have on the town centre and existing retail within Banff. The loss of the
pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has
made significant investment in improving community and sporting
provision locally to the value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Comple x in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the coordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale sports or
community projects may be subject to a separate public consultation to
decide the best use of Common Good money.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
88
3) I have huge concerns regarding the potential sale of common
good land to Morrison’s. This land is a valuable to the
community and local football teams, it would be a great loss.
Whilst I support the proposal to build a Morrison’s store, I do not
believe that canal park is the correct location due to the loss of
football pitches and the fact that there is already a supermarket
in this location.
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
437215
Andy Ewen
I feel removing a grass pitch will be disastrous. The only other
suitable grass pitch is at Myrus and it is of a very poor standard.
Canal park is used by hundreds of players from 12- senior
football
437218
Lindsey
Bligdon
I think it’s absolutely crazy to build a supermarket on canal park.
The area is already busy enough with coop, Tesco and spotty
bag without adding another supermarket in the same location. It
will cause chaos with locals trying to get about. Canal park is
also used for local football teams which without it would be lost.
Yes they could use AstroTurf in Banff/Macduff but these cost a
fortune which the teams can’t afford as they have to raise funds
for kits/referees etc as it is. There are plenty other locations in
Banff a supermarket could be located, for example where the
chicken factory used to be on Tannery Street in Banff, it is
unused land which is an eyesore. I’m sure locals would be
happy to have a supermarket than 100’s of seagulls on their
doorstep. Would make so much more sense and would leave
Canal Park as is. Not only would it help local teams but it’s part
of Banff’s history with teams playing on that park for years.
Response
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy .
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
89
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
437223
437322
Kim Adams
Sara Oakes
There is other ground more suitable for a supermarket, canal
park is an asset to the people of Banff and macdufff. 770 kids
use the park to play football , train, & enjoy themselves . 3 other
11 aside teams also play & train there. It’s perfect for the older
residents from crown court &. Airlie gardens to walk through a
fantastic safe green space . The fact that there is a wall on old
market place which is listed an eyesore of a modern glass box in
that area will be out of place. Also unsuitable from the point of
view there is already 3 supermarkets within 100 m of there , you
would find that jobs would be lost there within these existing
businesses. No local contractors would be used to build the
supermarket as these tend to come pre done. Aberdeenshire
council already get £28,000 from one of the groups pa. if AC do
not want the park , transfer it to the community.
1. The land is not theirs to sell. It belongs to the community, and
is well used by the community. 2. There is no benefit to the
community 3. Ruining the aesthetics of an historic market town.
There are already two supermarkets in Banff and we don't need
a third! Concerned about negative impact on existing small
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies
and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and , listed or conservation consent.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
90
ID
437389
Respondent
Name
Robert
Thompson
Representation
Response
businesses in the town. 4. I feel strongly opposed to this
propsed sale of land.
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and listed or conservation consent.
Impact on other businesses has been noted and will be included in the
report to Area Committee.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
Efforts will be made to accommodate clubs/groups sporting
requirements in the most appropriate and affordable way.
91
1. This land should stay common land for use of the locals - but
upgrades are required. 2. A supermarket would benefit the area,
but it can be located elsewhere (old chicken factory, industrial
area at macduff, opposite the macduff sports centre or opposite
the banff springs are all much better locations). 3. If this does go
ahead, it will all need replaced for use of locals, cheap pitches
for smaller teams, free use tennis courts etc. not all familys can
afford the rediculus council memberships. 4 Community centre
and surronding area should have cash invested to upgrade area
that young kids can play for free. we should be looking at a new
skatepark and pump track for bikes, basketball court and a new
pavillion
ID
437833
438670
Respondent
Name
Hebbie Gray
Elizabeth
Sellwood
Representation
Response
There are numerous other sites that could be used by Morrisons
for their supermarket but this is the only grass football pitch that
meets with SFA requirements available for the community and is
not cost restrictive. Youth boys and girls and senior teams from
across the shire visit Banff and play on Canal park. If this green
area within the centre of Banff is removed this will have a
detrimental impact on all. Common good land needs to be
preserved for the community and the councillors have a duty of
care to ensure this type of land is used for the benefit of the
community not for a business with a head office in Bradford. The
community hub is based adjacent to canal park and if this area
could be preserved and retained by the community then the
community hub can provide even more. The volunteering work
and efforts of the hub have been recognised nationally and this
good work needs to be promoted and encouraged and the
change of use of this land prohibits and hinders their good work.
Why use a green grass site used regularly by the community
when there are at least 4 other sites available in Banff and
Macduff that would suit a supermarket without removing an
important facility. The Scottish Government has just released
figures stating that over 60% of adults are overweight with 29%
of them obese and 30% of children are overweight and
Aberdeenshire council are considering removing a facility that
provides health and wellbeing benefits to the public and
replacing it with a supermarket that arguably is partly
responsible for the aforementioned health issues in adults and
youths. I appreciate that Morrisons moving to Banff can bring
jobs and provide additional shopping choices but this should not
be at the cost of removing canal park football pitch and
additional green space. Lets put health and mental wellbeing for
this and future generations ahead of short term money gain. My
son is part of the Deveronvale football community and over the
years I have taken numerous youths from Ellon and surrounding
area through to Banff for sport at Canal Park
I find it hard to understand how you are so keen to dispose of an
area of green space which was gifted to the local community.
Surely somewhere else could be found to build a supermarket
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted. The loss
of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire
Council has made significant investment in improving community and
sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million pounds in recent
years. This investment, after engagement with the community, took the
form of new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex
in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including
improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football
Association standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
92
ID
439471
Respondent
Name
Susan
Connon
Representation
Response
other than this. To have a large supermarket as the main view
coming over Banff bridge is so depressing. Banff is a beautiful
town - or has the potential to be beautiful if the present buildings
were maintained. Surely, for those of you in power, can think of
generations ahead. Will they really thank you for facilitating the
building of a supermarket? Or do you really care?
1: Canal Park is common good land, a green space at the
entrance of Banff. This is not the place to build a large
supermarket. The land was gifted to the people of Banff and
Macduff so therefore should not be sold to a third party. There
are many other projects which could be considered for this land
to benefit the community and environment. Also, a large number
of local people and community groups use this land currently. If
it gets sold then it will be gone forever. 2: I cannot see any
potential benefits to selling off this piece of land. However, I
support the need for a supermarket, just not this location. 3: The
impact on the area would be negative due to the loss of green
space for concrete. This area is a flood plain and developing it in
this way will only exacerbate this issue. Increased traffic to this
area would be problematic if access were to be from the bottom
of Bridge Street which is currently being regenerated to make it
more pedestrianised. More vehicles would use Bridge Street as
a 'rat run' for access to the supermarket. I also feel it would
negatively affect existing businesses and pull trade away from
the town centre as has been seen in other small towns.
Morrisons would become a 'one stop shop' as it is proposed to
have a café and petrol station, clothes and electrical goods. 4:
Banff is a coastal town with a wealth of history attached to it.
Building a large supermarket at its entrance would permanently
change the aesthetics for both locals and visitors alike.
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted. Any
planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies and
Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and , listed or conservation consent.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements
to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale
sports or community projects may be subject to a separate public
consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development. when it
comes to impacting local businesses negatively the store is likely to
generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be
dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and
may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
93
ID
439935
440661
Respondent
Name
Jan Emery
Edward L.
Acton
Representation
Response
I support the proposal to sell the land to Morrisons for the
construction o a supermarket
I am not in favour of the proposal. I do feel that as the proposal
affects the public interest the Council might have approached
this in a way which would have encouraged a discussion of what
the future might hold for retail and leisure in general. 1 The
previous proposal to sell to Tesco met with, at best from a sale
angle, a mixed public response. 2 This proposal does not come
from a consensus in the community that either development is
desired or a Morrison's supermarket is desired. 3 This proposal
is being imposed on the local community in isolation without
wider consideration of wants/needs in relation to a supermarket,
retail in general or leisure on a yes or no basis. Unfortunately not
all retail now fits a "High Street" type setting but retail elsewhere
can damage existing High Street businesses. However if retail is
going elsewhere should that new location include provision for
other non High Street retailers or other business units which
might include premises for tradesmen? For example plumbers,
electricians, vehicle repairs and such like businesses might not
be well suited to a shopping street setting but might involve a
degree of retail. The plumber for example might stock bathroom
suites. 4 Land is a valuable asset which can be used for
different purposes over the years as fashions come and go. If
the land is sold then that flexibility to change use eg to and from
tennis courts, football field etc is lost. 5 Although land can
depreciate in value over time it tends to hold its value better than
money. £1 in 1971 would buy much more than £1 in 2021.
Although dangerous to make general statements money can be
viewed more of a means of exchange whereas land can often be
viewed as an investment or store of value. 6 Retail fashion
changes over relatively short periods of time. With more online
shopping by customers will another supermarket be viable in say
10 years time? 7 I suspect that the site may not be purchased by
Morrisons but by a property developer which will lease to
Morrisons so the ultimate owner is likely to have less ties locally
than Morrisons. There is a suggestion that Tesco leases their
existing premises and might not renew the Lease although that
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
The previous sale to Tesco had a non statutory consultation with public
in favour given the sports facilities to be delivered, The sale did not
proceed but the council still delivered significant new sporting facilities
This consultation is to seek the communities views.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. when it comes to the use of the land, Common Good land is
owned by Aberdeenshire Council but administered separately from
other local authority property. Vested by s 222 Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local Government etc. (Scotland)
Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm that in administering
common good property the authority must have regard to the interests
of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the Council’s responsibility to
Common Good, it must consider use of assets in addition to maintaining
the historical aspect. It is understood this can often be difficult to
reconcile but sale is considered to be best use of this asset for the
inhabitants of the area.
The sale is to Morrisons and not a 3rd party .
Land can be held as an asset however it needs to be utilised to bring
benefits and past performance is no indicator of future value.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted.
94
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
could be a Tesco inspired suggestion/threat to ensure that the
rent payable in respect of a new Lease is reasonable. 8 It is
unlikely that the local market will increase significantly so
increased employment by Morrisons is likely to be balanced by
jobs lost elsewhere. 9 Although the Council appear to expect the
existing Banff bridge to continue in service indefinitely surely it is
likely to be replaced at least for vehicular traffic and if so would a
new bridge be on the site of the existing bridge, beside it or
elsewhere and would any part of this land be valuable as a
laying down or storage area and an area where site offices and
facilities could be sited temporarily during construction? 10 I
suspect that once again most residents of Macduff would prefer
a new retail outlet to be sited in Macduff, even with an Aldi.
Indeed that might offer the opportunity to develop small retail
and/or office/leisure or other consumer orientated units nearby
and add to local employment opportunities. It might be more
difficult to make such provision at Canal Park. There might also
be less damage to existing retail facilities and to Banff High
Street. 11 If the land is sold how does the Council propose to
ensure that the price obtained retains the value which the land
would have held, especially if the value of money is eroded by
inflation? Points 4 & 5 are relevant to this. 12 To amplify point 3 :
The information given neither attempts to identify the needs of
the Communities of Macduff and Banff nor what these
Communities might want. If needs and wants are identified then
consideration can be given to how the needs of the
Communities might be met, where the communities of Macduff
and Banff might want facilities and if the Communities would
prefer to retain existing shopping facilities in preference to
replacing these with a new facility. If a new facility is to come to
the area consideration should be given to where the
Communities would wish it to be sited and if the Communities
would wish it to be stand alone or be part of a larger
development and what sort of development. As the proposal
develops some of these preliminary comments may be
superseded eg the Council may make proposals in relation to
investing the price so as to maintain value.
The proceeds of sale will be held in common good but such investment
is not purely in economic terms as will deliver expenditure to deliver
community benefit which is a significant value in itself
95
ID
442174
Respondent
Name
Angela
Wiseman
442551
Raymond
Paterson
442781
Edith
McLeod
Representation
Response
Banff needs this investment, currently Banff and Macduff have
been towns in the death throws for quite some years with 0
significant investment leading to 0 significant employment
opportunities for the local population. Tesco and Co op are used
as nothing more than corner shops when something runs out,
being small stores they only carry smaller sized product ranges
which long term are the expensive way to shop, thus anyone
with transport opts to shop online or outwith the area at larger
stores with family sized product selections meaning that 1000s
of locals no longer step foot in Banff to shop for anything, myself
included, what little choice there now is in Banff does not
warrant the fuel or bus costs in getting there esp during a period
of 3yrs where I have been unsuccessfully looking for work.
Aberdeenshire council DO NOT OWN THIS LAND. It is
COMMON GOOD LAND. The council are mistaken if they think
they can sell it - it is owned by the people in the area; ONLY
THEY CAN DISPOSE OF IT It would be a criminal offence for
the council to sell it. Action will be taken if they do so. . BE
WARNED
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
I do not feel it is appropriate to sell this land for use by a
supermarket. Although this would bring jobs there are other
locations much more suitable for a supermarket which do not
impact the amenity of what is a lovely spot which should be
maximised for sport, recreation and tourism purposes. A
supermarket represents the wrong development in the wrong
place but in another location I would not hesitate in endorsing it.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as es
comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports
Complex in Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring
it to Scottish Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider
community use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further
improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be
possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by
undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
96
ID
442898
443102
443144
Respondent
Name
Roy
Robinson
David Watt
Dave
Winchester
Representation
I agree that the area of Banff and Macduff does require a larger
super market, but strongly object to the sale of the Canal park
for this purpose. The Park is used quite often for the local teams
and in my opinion should not be sold off for a supermarket, there
are other sites surely? The site of the old chicken factory or on
one of the industrial sites? There would be major traffic
congestion over the Bridge which is on the main road to the
Highlands, the bridge itself requires upgrade as HGVs struggle
to cross without mounting the pavement. I owned a business in
Banff when Duff House Gallery was planned and opened we
were urged to support the project as we were told the gallery
would bring business to the town, we supported the gallery but
never saw any increase in business, I owned a hotel/restaurant
once the gallery opened it's own restaurant with drinks licence
we in fact lost trade, yes bring a Supermarket to the area but do
not sacrifice Canal Park to do so
Has a study been made to examine the current usage of the
ground? With the presentation on the sale expressing that there
may be additional throughput into Banff, has there been
consideration into the upgrading of the Banff bridge to cope with
additional traffic?
My concerns are safety related. Traffic and parking is already a
problem in this area with the Princess Royal Park, Coop and
Spotty bag in the area. With them and a new store so near the
bridge it increases the probability of congestion and possible
accidents.
Response
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any
other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be subject
to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of Common
Good money.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
97
ID
443159
443177
Respondent
Name
Gordon
Donald
Linda
Galindo
Representation
Response
Who gives the Aberdeenshire council the authority to sell
common good land? I think a supermarket is a great idea but not
on the area being proposed. Banff springs brae, macduff
industrial site, top of Duff street Macduff or the old chicken
factory site in Tannery street a a few alternative sites. Both my
children have played football on the canal park and all visiting
teams (male &female) commented on it location and easy
accessibility from all other regions.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
There's enough supermarkets in Banff. Wrong place to put
another 1.canal Park gets used regular with children playing foot
ball.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt
with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in
improving community and sporting provision locally to the value of
£12.5 million pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Comple x in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the coordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale sports or
community projects may be subject to a separate public consultation to
decide the best use of Common Good money.
98
ID
Representation
443196
Respondent
Name
Paul hendry
443205
Louise
Banff would benefit greatly from a large supermarket
443222
Not Provided
Don't sell this land for a supermarket!!!
443231
Sally Smith
I believe it is inappropriate for Aberdeenshire Council to be
selling off an asset belonging to the community. The fact that the
land is presently used regularly for sporting and leisure purposes
reinforces my opinion . I do not believe that allowing it to be
used for commercial purposes is aligned with the spirit of the
legacy .
443249
Colin
Alexander
I feel that this area should not be used for Morrison's , there are
other areas more suitable .
443265
Dod
Response
Respondent made no comment.
Council have no right to try sell ground that does NOT belong to
them
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Thank you for your response, your comment is noted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
It is noted there has been discussions for other potential retailers, but
they were all offered the opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison
were selected via the competitive tendering process which the council is
obliged to comply with.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by
s 222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
99
ID
Respondent
Name
443273
Tracy
443292
Sarah A
Ritchie
443293
Jacqueline
robertson
Representation
Response
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
I think having the supermarket on the canal park site will spoil
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
the lovely view people get coming over the bridge. If it’s sited
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
there, where do the football teams who regularly use it go to play common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
their games? I’m not sure if they currently have to pay to use the there is a need within the community for such facilities. The precedent
facility but if they don’t and have to go elsewhere then how will
of a supermarket on this site has already been established with
the costs be funded? I’m also concerned about the impact a
previous planning and statutory consents being granted. Any planning
store like this will have on our local butcher & fishmongers as I
application will have to have regard to relevant policies and Historic
believe this store will have these too, this will surely put them out Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning applications and,
of business in the long term? Also do we need another petrol
listed or conservation consent.
station when we already have 2 with more available in other
Efforts will be made to accommodate clubs/groups sporting
towns in close proximity to Banff? I believe from the LDP there is requirements in the most appropriate and affordable way.
plans for a new bridge, will this be going ahead? I’d like to hope
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact of other businesses.
that if Morrison’s do come to the area it may encourage other
small businesses to open up in the town as well so long as it
isn’t in direct competition with what they sell. This town needs a
bit more vibrancy about it, but I’m not convinced that the area of
land being suggested is the right place. I’d also like to see a
new skate park created as the current one is in a mess & it’s
well used by lots of children, I’m not sure if this comes under the
canal park site or if it’s under princess royal park.
I see no benefit to the area by the sale of Canal Park. I believe it It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
would be detrimental to Banff because it is the wrong location.
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
What is wrong with brownfield sites ie. the site of the old chicken precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
factory or the purpose built industrial estate in Macduff.
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
I don’t think it’s right that the council sell the ground at canal
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
park which has been gifted to the area therefore how can this
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
land be sold. Im not against a new supermarket but I am against 222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
the proposed site of Canal park. The lovely green area should
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
be left as it is and a new site should be chosen for the
that in administering common good property the authority must have
supermarket.
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
100
ID
443464
Respondent
Name
Hazel A
Wallace
Representation
I am of the strong opinion that Aberdeenshire Council should
NOT be selling Canal Park to any supermarket or anyone. I
cannot understand why the council has a right to sell land that
was gifted to the people of Banff and Macduff. Common Good
Land is precious and should stay Common Good Land. If lost,
it's lost for good. This park is in a prime, central position in Banff
and I do not think anyone should be offering any price on it. Was
it up for sale and if so, who put it up sale and why???This green
area adds to the beauty of our towns and any building/carpark
would most definitely spoil this. I am not against Morrisons
coming to Banff or Macduff but this is certainly NOT the place for
it! As Banff has already supermarkets nearby, if there is a need
for another I'd like to know why Aberdeenshire Council hasn’t
prioritised Macduff?? For years Macduff folks have had to drive
to Banff for their shopping. To attract visitors to Banff and
Macduff we should be promoting the natural beauty of our
towns, NOT building more large supermarkets and car parks.
We just need to look at other towns around us that have had
their high streets destroyed by supermarkets. Smaller shops
cannot compete with the larger stores. Is this what the Council
wants? Supermarkets DON'T attract visitors to the town but
smaller unique shops do. Banff High Street is starting to buzz
again. Has the Council thought about how another supermarket
would affect our sweet shop (Candy Box) our butcher (Stewarts)
our bakers, newsagents, chemists, fishmongers, cafes and
petrol stations??? If anyone decides to go to another town for
their groceries they go to the supermarket only, buy their
foodstuffs then go back home to get their perishables in their
Response
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation. It is noted there has been publicity around
discussions for other potential sites but to date none have been
brought forward. The precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design and
the application. The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need for
any development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to
be prohibitive to development.
Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for listed or conservation
consent.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
101
ID
443487
Respondent
Name
Robert
WALLACE
Representation
Response
fridges! They don't shop elsewhere. If this large area of grass
and natural drainage was to be turned into a car park,
FLOODING would also be a problem! We have seen flooding
problems here before so any more tarred surfaces would only
add to this. As a reminder, this happened in Buckie on more
than one occasion when the new Tesco was built leaving nearby
new homeowners knee-high in muddy water. Lastly. I feel it is
very unfair to all the users of Canal Park to consider taking this
recreational amenity from them. This should be kept as the only
full size grass football pitch which has been used through many
generations of local families. It was so sad that the tennis courts
were closed to the locals too. We should be promoting
recreation and leisure not destroying it and Canal Park is the
place to do this.... so many better things could happen here NOT
a supermarket.
CANAL PARK CANNOT BE SOLD. IT'S COMMON GOOD
LAND AND SHOULD STAY COMMON GOOD LAND. IT
BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE OF BANFF AND MACDUFF, NOT
ABERDEENSHIRE COUNCIL. WHY IS A SALE EVEN BEING
CONSIDERED AND BY WHO? WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT
MORRISONS THAT THE COUNCIL ARE CONSIDERING
SELLING TO THEM?? IF A NEW SUPERMARKET IS
REQUIRED HERE IT SHOULD BE IN MACDUFF, NOT BANFF
WHERE THERE IS ALREADY SUPERMARKETS.OUR BANFF
BRIDGE IS NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE AT THE MOMENT! ANY
SUPERMARKET ON CANAL PARK WOULD JUST INCREASE
THE TRAFFIC AND HEAVY VEHICLES USING IT AND ADD
TO THE PROBLEMS THAT ALREADY EXIST NOT TO
MENTION PEDESTRIANS THAT HAVE TO WALK OVER IT!!!
NO TO A SUPERMARKET ON CANAL PARK !! NO TO
SELLING CANAL PARK !!!
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact of other businesses.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
Aberdeenshire Council has confirmed Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
(“Morrisons”) as the preferred bidder for the site following an extensive
marketing and selection exercise.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
102
ID
Respondent
Name
James
Arnold
resident
sandyhill
road
Representation
Response
Banff dose not need another supermarket. It would kill the high
street for good . As well as be an eye sore to the landscape of
the town
443714
lorna
Meiklejohn
i do not think aberdeenshire council should be selling the ground
to anybody, is it legally theirs to sell ? plenty better sites for
morrisons
443815
Allan
Davidson
Surely common good land is there for the benefit of all the
people and should be kept as such. It's not there to bolster
Aberdeenshire councils coffers
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
103
443556
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
443953
James Gault
I have no objection to the development of a new supermarket in
the area but do not think the canal park is the place for it due to
the fact that it would be an eyesore at the entrance to the town, I
would also be concerned about the increase of traffic coming
over the Banff bridge. There are plenty of other suitable sites in
the area if Morrisons really want to locate here. I would also like
to see the canal park area developed into a more attractive
recreation area with more kids play equipment and also some
tree planting.
443966
Cal Fummels
Golf
A supermarket on this piece of ground is total madness, the
bonny view of Banff will be ruined, the traffic on the bridge will
increase & there are already 2 supermarkets within 100m of this
site? Have you lost the plot completely? Remember once it’s
gone it’s gone forever!
Response
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The sale proceeds would form part of the Banff & Macduff Common
Good funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the
people of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding
future projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities.
This fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on good design.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
104
ID
444709
Respondent
Name
Margaret
Byrne
444713
Vincent
Byrne
444901
Duncan
Mckenzie
445032
Janie Byrne
445190
Les mcintosh
445636
Alison Smith
Representation
Response
The sooner this is completed and the store open can't come
quick enough Long overdue especially this supermarket
There are plenty of other opportunities for the users of the park
which aren't all that many to use and it will also get rid of an
eyesore entering the town
This will make a huge difference to the people of Banff and
surrounding area both by employment and shopping Can't see
it having any effect on the small shops in the town
Banff/macduff are in desperate need of new shops.no one shops
in banff.if morrisons builds a store hopefully will stop people
shopping elsewhere. Attract more business locally. We built
macduff sports centre for football,canal Park is a eyesore at
moment
The local area needs a new source of employment and this will
bring significant income to the local area, I agree with the
proposed plan to build the Morrisons supermarket
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Respondent made no comment.
1. The disposal of Common Good land ought to be viewed in
the long term, as consequences will affect local residents far into
the future. The site is of inestimable amenity value, enhancing
the eastern approach to Banff and giving it a quality of grace and
spaciousness in keeping with its historic role. In addition it is a
material legacy of the Duff family to the citizens of Banff AND
Macduff. This connection will be irreversibly lost if the proposed
development goes ahead and the negative aesthetic impact will
be regretted by future generations. 2. There are already two
supermarkets in the close vicinity and I would question whether
a third in this particular location would be of lasting benefit to the
local community. Retail space for a supermarket is already
allocated elsewhere in the Councils Area Plan. 3. Banff is
already well served by retail outlets, whereas Macduff has seen
a significant loss of similar services over recent years. As a
Macduff resident, I would welcome a new supermarket on the
east side of the Deveron which would be within walking distance
for local inhabitants. 4. The perceived benefits of a new
development in Banff imply an increase in the number of
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
105
ID
445746
Respondent
Name
George
McRae
Representation
Response
vehicles using Banff Bridge and adding to congestion there.
This issue appears not to have been addressed in the
consultation documents made available to the public.
1 & 2 It is time for the community of Banff to recognise that
severe investment and regeneration is required. I can remember
back as far as 2002 as a young person that there were
proposals for a supermarket in this area of Banff. Banff is in
severe need of regeneration and investment to create jobs and
boost the local economy. Over the last 20 years, we only need
to look at the amount of industry / shops that have closed /
moved elsewhere. Therefore jobs are of a bigger scarce and
Banff shows some of the highest figure of deprivations and need
in Aberdeenshire. 3: Is Canal Park the best location for a
supermarket and would a supermarket facility be in favour of
supporting the local infrastructure such as roads and the
Deveron Bridge. 4. Banff & Macduff have received over £12
Million of Sports Facilities which opened in 2017. Across Banff in
Macduff there are Football facilities at Banff Academy, Princess
Royal Park, Myrus Park and other small recreational spaces.
There is also development potential for spaces to be utilised
further such as Duff House for football pitches. Having played
football for 20+ years at various levels; I think anyone involved in
Football needs to see the wider picture. The number of young
people currently playing football in the surrounding communities
is in decline and the evidence base here is not around
opportunities to play football, as clubs like Deveronvale
Community Football Club have centralised all local clubs
meaning less young people are accessing football and choosing
to participate in other sports. Despite maybe seeing a loss of a
football pitch, there are plenty other sites with potential which
can be shared which are more viable. If Canal Park is to be
retained as a site, the supporting committee should be made to
undertake the whole facility under the community empowerment
bill and maintain the facility wholly. Football clubs cannot have
their cake and eat it. If they want facilities alike this they should
be willing to pay for the upkeep of them and not expect the local
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
106
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
authorities to continue to subsidise them and keep buildings that
are no longer fit for purpose.
Locals to Banff and Macduff and surrounding area not opposed
to a supermarket, think you would find majority of people would
like to see it come to Macduff. It would serve the area this side
of the bridge , give better access, give Macduff some trade, in
doing this it would leave Canal Park as it was meant to be for
community….
Get it built
446097
Mary
McIntosh
446818
Les mcintosh
447547
Gillian Wood
I disagree with the sale of land to any potential buyer. The land
belongs to the people of Banff not the council. It would ruin the
beautiful approach into Banff. There are many other sites in
Banff that could be used. Don’t take away our green space.
449396
David
1. Area should not be sold, not to a supermarket, or to anyone
else. 2. No benefits of proposal compared to the supermarket
located elsewhere locally. 3. The land is a common free to use,
large green space, something now and in the future as more
housing is developed will be in short supply. We need to keep
the green areas as we can. All other green areas are either
being eroded or are "pay to play" rather than free like Canal
Park. 4. I am not opposed to the building of a new supermarket,
quite the opposite infact and a new supermarket COULD (not
would) be a benefit to the community, however the location of
canal park is not the best suited for this use. There are multiple
Response
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
107
ID
Respondent
Name
452101
Natasha
452165
Iain Gray
Representation
Response
other sites suitable (the new Macduff area where Aberdeenshire
Council and the Coastguard are located as well as other empty
space/ fields are available) I have a feeling Aberdeenshire
Council will continue as is with the sale regardless as it sees this
as a business opportunity for banff rather than for the best
interests of the community.
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
Definitely in favour! There are plenty football pitches in and
around banff and Macduff. The ground in question seems to be
rarely used, only used for the odd weekend game which brings
with it a mountain of traffic that can’t be any different to traffic a
supermarket may bring. The new sports centres both have
football pitches that were only built on the agreement the land
would be sold. A larger supermarket would bring so many
benefits to such a small “dying town”. Driving through Macduff
there are so many run down buildings. Driving over banff bridge
you have the beautiful river and golf course to look at. As soon
as you drive over the bridge the first thing you see is the co op I
don’t see how a supermarket being built behind that will ruin the
scenery. As someone who lives in Banff and doesn’t care for our
supermarkets we do have I make a 30-60 minute journey to
different supermarkets. A new supermarket in Banff would be
extremely beneficial for the citizens that don’t care for our
current supermarkets due to lack of different produce and high
cost
I think it's an excellent idea, bringing much needed employment
to the area at a time when redundancies are at a high, aswell as
There is no suggestion of using Common Good funds to fund the
Council’s other statutory responsibilities. The Council has a statutory
obligation to provide certain services and allocation of budgets is
considered considering area needs. Use of Common Good funds for
local projects or to assist in community funding is a competent use of
such funds.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
108
ID
Respondent
Name
452242
Kevin
Dingwall
452256
CS
452367
Daniel Taylor
Representation
a large supermarket within travelling distance for locals. There
are more than enough football pitches in the area now with the
Academy in Banff, sports centre in Macduff aswell as the rugby
pitches at Duff House.
I am happy for Aberdeenshire Council to proceed with the sale
of Canal Park. We have plenty of green space within the area.
The prospect of a larger supermarket can only be a benefit to
the town. I have no concerns.
Not particularly well thought out. The additional traffic in the
area, and overall lack of parking, will cause issues should a
reasonably sized supermarket be built on the site. A smaller
supermarket may reduce this concern, but Banff does not need
another super market that does not quite live up to the name
"super".
The amenity of the area would be ruined by any such
development. It is one of the first things seen when driving over
the bridge and the amount of space and green areas we
currently have is better than the mediocre architecture of a shop
and tarmac carpark.
Better that the park is maintained as a play area. Move the skate
park from its current location to the former tennis courts so that it
can be expanded (it is one of the most well used features of the
town these days) and maybe feed it in to the current
redevelopment of Bridge Street. Done right this could give the
town a rather lovely link from the bridge to low Street that's very
pedestrian friendly.
This is common good land. Keep it for the benefit of the people
of Banff. I would think that having the park well kept would serve
Banff better than the sale proceeds that would be quickly
squandered by the Council.
I do not disagree that we could do with a good sized super
market, and I quite like Morrisons, but not in the park please.
Not the right place for a superstore considering the amount it is
used and by whom it is used
Response
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
There is no suggestion of using Common Good funds to fund the
Council’s other statutory responsibilities. The Council has a statutory
obligation to provide certain services and allocation of budgets is
considered considering area needs. Use of Common Good funds for
local projects or to assist in community funding is a competent use of
such funds.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
109
ID
Respondent
Name
452387
Robert
McArthur
452541
Mark Slessor
452607
Chris Holmes
Representation
I understand that this is a very hot topic within Banff and
Macduff. We have waited well over 20+yrs initially for a larger
Tesco on this site and lost it. We have said no to Asda on the
outskirts of the town and it seems we could potentially loose a
Morrison’s in Banff because of the proposed site. I am sure the
Council have done due diligence and have not been able to
secure any other site for Morrison’s and therefore the site at
Canal Park is the best site. On this premise I am happy to
support going ahead with this new supermarket.
I am totally against this proposed sale of this green land for a
supermarket, this a very well used Grass football pitch, it brings
a lot of people to the town for games, who then spend in the
local shops, it was land gifted to the people of Banff & Macduff
and shouldn’t be sold, also the addition traffic it would cause at
the bridge would cause major problems, the town needs a
bigger supermarket, but just not at that location.
I am in favour , the benefits outweigh the disadvantages. It will
encourage people to shop in the area rather than out with and
will provide employent, plus the money raised will benefit the
area
Response
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact on the area has been noted and will be included in
the report to Area Committee.
110
ID
452663
Respondent
Name
Reg Barker
452716
Matheu
barclay
453331
Stew Fowlie
453367
Darren
Duncan
Representation
Response
Yes. The town is dying. So we need a Supermarket. Also this
will generate jobs for people in the community.
This is what the town needs, for years we have had to drive for
the weekly shop or have it delivered. The reason for this is we
dont have a big supermarket locally. Hopefully it will sell school
cloths and electricals as it would be fantastic not do dive to elgin
for this. Also added jobs locally woyld be fantastic.
I believe there is greater community benefit to be found in
retaining appropriate space for physical activity and sport than
there is in developing the site for retail purposes. We should
consider the value and not just the cost - pa and sport should be
viewed as an investment in the community's physical mental and
social health.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
1. Far better sites available, 2. Not opposed to new
supermarkets as will bring jobs to the area much needed
3. Lack of grass pitches locally with Myrus being deemed
unplayable by local referees, 4. Would be far better suited to the
industrial site in Macduff
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Comple x in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
111
ID
453449
453580
Respondent
Name
Phil McIntosh
(on behalf of
my Banffresident
mother)
Representation
Response
1. Common good land here is used widely by the community
and the need to keep green space in the town is important,
particularly given the Canal Park’s location at the entrance to the
town. Strongly disapprove of this proposed sale. 2. Only
potential benefit appears to be jobs. However, longer term this
will be offset by the smaller supermarkets possibly having to
close and the negative impacts on smaller retailers such as
bakers and butchers. Comments made about a big supermarket
bringing more people into Banff May be true, but in my view they
would merely fill up their cars and drive home! 3. Large
supermarket not needed!! At least 2 decent sized supermarkets
in town already and small independent stores should be
encouraged instead. Loss of this green space and football pitch
should not be allowed, especially given current concerns over
young people’s inactivity etc. 4. Although not resident in Banff,
my mother is and I was brought up there, regularly using Canal
Park for casual and organised football. If the Council is keen to
encourage a large supermarket to come to Banff, a different
location should be found.
William Shaw
I think it is a good idea to bring some much needed retail footfall
back into Banff. Hopefully the store would be large enough to
draw in people who currently drive to Fraserburgh / Huntly. My
only concern would be the probable increased congestion at the
narrow bridge across the Deveron. I'd also want to ask what the
purchase money will be spent on as both communities got a
sports centre from the last sale!
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Impact on employment and other retailer is noted and will be included in
the report to Area Committee.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
112
ID
453723
453924
Respondent
Name
Janet Bain
Representation
Response
The Common good land was gifted to the people of Banff to
provide sports facilities, surely the Council should not be able to
sell it to be used for a supermarket. There is no way that a
supermarket will bring visitors into the town. I believe that such
a property should be placed in a more suitable such as Macduff
industrial estate.
Lorna
MacLeod
My understanding is that the sale of this land has been the
subject of discussion for many years. Various large
supermarkets have shown interest in bringing their store to Banff
i.e Tesco, Asda and now Morrisons. On the surface I feel it
would be hugely beneficial for Banff and the locality. For
example, competitive fuel pricing, customer choice on a huge
range of goods that stores already in place are either too small
to carry or tend to be more expensive. Using Canal Park as a
site for a supermarket will encourage visitors travelling through
to stop, pick up supplies and perhaps spend some time
exploring other shops rather than merely driving though.
However, there are a number of concerns about the loss of
facilities that currently utilise this space. Although not in constant
use, this area is used by local residents. Therefore offering
better and new alternatives needs to be included. This was
indeed the case when Tesco were in the offing - pitches and
sports centre (Macduff) are the evidence of those negotiations.
Having a supermarket of this calibre in the town will bring the
local dispersed community in to shop rather than go to Huntly or
Buckie, again this in the long run may benefit other shops in the
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
113
ID
454006
Respondent
Name
K J Bain
Representation
area. Banff needs regeneration - a face-lift has begun but that
only scratches the surface. Say YES to Morrisons!
The proposed area for disposal is largely a green and
recreational space. I know that replacement recreational
facilities have been provided in two buildings and two AstroTurf
pitches at The Deveron Community & Sports Centre and
Macduff Community & Sports Centre, however, they are not in
the town centre and neither replace the green space that is at
Canal Park. With "Health & Wellbeing" and "Resilient
Communities" as two strategic priorities for Aberdeenshire
Council, disposing of a green and recreational space would be
detrimental to the environment and the wellbeing of folk in the
town, and at odds with community planning priorities. The
proposed area is also Common Good Land gifted to the
residents of Banff & Macduff. It should not be sold and should
remain within Aberdeenshire Council's estate. Aberdeenshire
Council could consider leasing the site as has been done in
many other areas. However, another priority for Banff & Buchan
is to tackle poverty and inequalities, including food poverty. With
this in mind, Banff & Macduff would benefit from a supermarket
as currently people have to travel at least half an hour to have
access to the things they need. If you don't have a car, you
currently have very little choice of where to shop and hence little
choice of quality of food and/or value for money. Making Banff a
destination for people to do their weekly shop would keep
people and wealth in the area contributing to a more vibrant
community. Therefore, my conclusion is that we should welcome
a supermarket for the two towns (Aldi or Lidl would provide the
best choice, quality and affordability) but a more appropriate site
should be found. There is word of Aldi being interested in the
site at Myrus Macduff which had been identified as a retail space
in the Macduff Development Plan, and we now hear that Lidl are
also looking for a site in the Banff area. If Canal Park is the only
option for development, Lidl would be much better placed on the
site as they utilize smaller spaces. An area could remain green
and landscaped to offer a recreational space which would
contribute to improved mental and physical health & wellbeing.
Response
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
The purpose of the consultation is to obtain the views of the people of
Banff in respect of the potential disposal of this land. Any sale will be
subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a Common Good
Order. The potential benefits and impacts in terms of the disposal will
therefore require to be weighted as part of the decision-making process.
If the land is sold the funds received will form part pf the Banff &
Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which is
administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit of
the people of Banff and Macduff.
The commercial operators are seeking ownership so lease not
commercially viable for development such as this.
We note your comments in terms of your preferred supermarket but
would advise that the consultation is not seeking views about alternative
providers as Wm Morrisons has been determined as the preferred
bidder in terms of this land.
114
ID
454087
Respondent
Name
Ray Calum
Skinner Banff
Rovers
Manager
454174
Tina Barclay
454270
Tina Barclay
Representation
They have no right to sell it. I don’t understand how they think
they can ether. I can’t just walk into my next door neighbours
house and put a for sale sign up and try and sell it when I don’t
own it. It’s been a football ground in Banff before any of us was
even born and a area for kids and adults to enjoy. The whole
point it was giving to the folk of Banff not for the council to try
and make a pound off it! The man that gave it would be turning
in his grave to hear what’s going on it’s madness.
Just get it done, Banff/Macduff has a fairly large commutor traffic
flow going through it, which suggests the footfall could be
significant for Morrisons and the surrounding local shops. Local
projects and community groups could benefit from the cash
injection to the common good fund, not withstanding jobs for
locals. There is no downside to the development of a the derelict
area of town people are greeted with when they currently visit
Banff for Spotty bag, a development that could provide the
footfall low street and high street needs to rejuvenate.
1. My Personal Views on the proposal are misleading,
Disgusting and disappointing. Canal Park is a very well used
football pitch for the many teams that use it and without it, it will
Response
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities.
This fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Any clubs/groups directly affected by the development will be
accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff. Demand will dictate the
availability of space and time at these sites and collaboration will be
115
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
be a disaster for the many volunteer led teams and clubs that
use it. Canal Park is an affordable pitch and i cant help but feel
we are getting backed into a corner by Aberdeenshire Council to
use astro pitches that are not affordable and is forcing club
membership fee's to increase which in hand forces people to fall
away from the game because of affordability. 2. I struggle to find
any benefits from the proposal. 3. The issues & Concerns i have
is Aberdeenshire Council and Councillors put this proposal
together and decided to sell this open space when it is well
used. The amount of lets that this facility has seen since the new
sports centres were built would suggest the usage would either
need to be replaced or retained. The consultation would suggest
this facility has already been replaced by these new facilities but
again football has changed and teams have increased along
with footfall in our community. since they have been built. The
users again have not been consulted in the fact of what their
requirements are now and again Aberdeenshire Council have
made a decision and proposed spending the money on sorting 2
x 11 aside Pitches at Banff academy without any suitable
changing facilities required for modern day football. The
Changing facilities in the School are not suitable like wise the
changing facilities inside the sports centre which are not big
enough and dont have Showers. No referee Changing rooms. Its
also proposed to spend more money on the grass pitch at
Macduff where again if Abredeenshore Council had maintained
them properly it wouldn't be in the state its in. These were all
highlighted in the first consultation before the new facilities were
built but ignored. 4. My Additional comments are simply NO to
the Sale of canal park. This open space should be retained by
the community for the benefit of community development.by the
clubs and organisations that use it. Deveronvale Community
Football Club Were refused a lease for the facility in Nov 2021 to
accommodate the increase in membership/Teams and also to
support The Community Hub and the services they provide in
the Community. Cllr Cox had suggested a replacement pitch
would be situated on the land Adjacent to Deveron Terrace and
Duff House Grounds but has since went silent since the start of
required, especially at peak times. We will make efforts to
accommodate clubs/groups sporting requirements in the most
appropriate and affordable way.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
Consideration of pitch replacement will form part of the mitigation to
address the loss of the pitch. However, previous investigations and
reports have highlighted the lack of suitable alternative sites and the
significant construction costs for the site which the council can access,
and which costs are likely to be in excess of any expected financial
receipt from any proposed sale. There will be consideration as part of
this consultation towards improvements or other mitigation for sporting
facilities provision.
This fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
The cost of a replacement pitch at Deveron terrace is not viable. And it
is considered the existing facilities more than meet the needs of the
sporting community .
116
ID
454280
Respondent
Name
Deveronvale
Community
Football Club
Representation
the consultation. and doesn't form part of the consultation in the
proposal on how the money from the sale would be spent?
Deveronvale Community Football Club are very concerned and
disappointed to find ourselves again in a battle to Save Canal
Park. Whilst the Club are not against new business opportunities
coming into the community, we are against the sale of canal
park for commercial business development. We as a club feel
that the canal park is an open space that currently provides
environmental, social and economic benefits to the community
by its current users and to our local businesses and should be
kept for the provision of leisure and sporting activities.
Deveronvale Community Football Club provides opportunities in
the sport of football to Boys and Girls from age 3-19 years old
where we have currently near 400 members supported by 70
Volunteer Coaches and is managed by 9 Trustees on the
management committee and without doubt the biggest voluntary
organisations in the community and one of the biggest in
Scotland, we are one of eight clubs in the North Region to have
attained the Scottish FA “Platinum” Quality Mark Award and late
2020 we had national recognition and voted as the “Best
Community Football Club” in Scottish Football at the recent
Grassroots Awards. The Club also runs a Community Hub that
provides families who have suffered hardship, reduced income
or just general living with support through the provision of
Clothes, food, Utilities and financial support where we have
linked with social services, Housing department, Health visitors,
food banks and other local organisations. We currently support
150 families. Living in one of the highest rated areas for child
poverty in Scotland, it's important for us that we are very
engaged in the community by using the power of football to bring
our communities together and support in any way we can. We
run Free football sessions supported by Mcdonalds weekly and
we also currently provide free provision to ten of our members
who simply cant afford to participate in football and as much as
we have 400 members at the club we would like to have double
that numbers but many families find it difficult financially. Our
Legal Structure at the club was confirmed early 2021 as we
Response
The work of the club in the community is known and recognised by the
Council. Any clubs/groups directly affected by the development will be
accommodated at a site in Banff or Macduff. Demand will dictate the
availability of space and time at these sites and collaboration will be
required, especially at peak times. We will make efforts to
accommodate clubs/groups sporting requirements in the most
appropriate and affordable way.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
Consideration of pitch replacement will form part of the mitigation to
address the loss of the pitch. However, previous investigations and
reports have highlighted the lack of suitable alternative sites and the
significant construction costs for the site which the council can access,
and which costs are likely to be in excess of any expected financial
receipt from any proposed sale. There will be consideration as part of
this consultation towards improvements or other mitigation for sporting
facilities provision.
This fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
117
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
were Successful in becoming a Scottish Charitable Incorporated
Organization (SCIO – SC050709) which in hand limits the
liabilities of our management committee with the vision of the
club inclusion and participation as we find ourselves at a bit of a
crossroads in terms of facilities which we feel is limiting us to
expand and provide further opportunities and thus allowing us to
be able to enter into negotiations for lease or community asset
transfer. The impact our club is making in the community and
bringing people to the area is unquestionable where on a weekly
basis the footfall 5000+. Since the introduction of the 2 x All
Weather surfaces 3 years ago it has made a huge difference in
terms of winter training and matches but it has to be said in that
time our club has changed and expanded by 40% which is
increasing the demand and also cost for the use of facilities.
Canal Park is currently getting used near enough every night of
the week and both Saturday’s and Sundays not only by
ourselves but that of Banff Rovers, Deveronvale FC and Macduff
AFC and will continue to do so which shows the importance of
the only available Grass Pitch for competitive football in our
community. It is imperative now and for future development that
this open space is retained for the common good and
Deveronvale Community Football Club would be keen to take
ownership of this. It has to be said and has been mentioned that
Canal park has already been replaced with the addition of the
new sports facilities and its further from the truth as still it doesn’t
meet the demand of the local clubs and the way we see it as
“Needed Facilities” to continue to meet demand and as growth
of participation is evident there is a lot required for the facilities
to continue to cope with the demand and that’s not just pitches,
that’s the management of the facilities which have fallen short on
a weekly basis since they opened and it seems to be a
continuous battle with no evident improvements to support our
requirements which is increasing the lack of confidence that we
are getting fully supported from Aberdeenshire Council. The
Proposal in the consultation suggests monies from the potential
sale of Canal Park would allow for Pitches at Banff academy to
be developed for competitive football and more money would be
118
ID
Respondent
Name
454476
David Bruce
454832
Jonathan
Ironside
Representation
spent on the grass pitch at Myrus which is unplayable but again
this proposal falls short of the requirements and there’s more
required in terms of changing, showering facilities and
accessibility priority between School and Community. I also
wrote to the Banff and Macduff Community Council but it
seemed they had already agreed a decision on where the
community council would be supporting without consulting the
users and have advised that no more discussions are to be held
on this matter. As a major stakeholder it would be our priority as
a club that Canal Park is retained as this is the only green space
left and available for community benefit for future community
development and we feel if the community is unsuccessful in its
bid to Save Canal Park then we as an organisation need to be
involved and have our say on any future plans and how the
capital receipt would be spent. Deveronvale Community Football
Club & Hub SC050709
If this sale proceeds, the funds received from the must be ring
fenced and used to provide additional similar type common
good. The funds should not be used to simply upgrade other
open areas or facilities maintained by the local authority and for
which they already have responsibility. It is self evident that any
development of this site will significantly increase traffic flow on
Banff bridge and the junctions at either end. The development
must take into account the likelihood of congestion extending
beyond the supermarket entrance and mitigate those
circumstances at the outset. The development will have
dramatic impact on the vista of a historic town for traffic
approaching from the east. Banff relies heavily on tourism and
all effort should be made to ensure the supermarket has
architectural merit to mitigate and soften its visual impact.
I think our area could be done with a morrisons but i dont think
this is the correct area for the project as canal park contributes
so much to all ages for mental and health benefits. I believe this
could be done elsewhere in the banff and macduff region without
causing major disruption to a well used facility.
Response
The final sale price is a seven-figure sum but due to commercial
confidentiality cannot be disclosed until the sale has concluded.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The sale proceeds will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good
funds to be held by Aberdeenshire Council for the benefit of the people
of Banff and Macduff and will give a substantial boost for funding future
projects aimed at benefiting the residents of these communities.
This fund is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee.
There are no proposals for spending the sale proceeds at this time, as
the consultation will help inform any decisions on that.
https://www.aberdeenshire.gov.uk/media/22524/banff-and- buchancommon-good-information-for-applicants.pdf.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
119
ID
454996
Respondent
Name
Lynne
Webster
Representation
Whilst I can see the potential benefits of a Morrison’s
Supermarket the location is not best suited to the need! This is
already a busy part of the town due to the spotty bag shop and
the football ground and traffic can be an issue during football
games as it is! The supermarket would only take custom away
from town centre rather than bring custom as the only shops we
really have left are food, butcher, bakers, and we want to be
seeing more shop fronts open, busy and thriving, not more
empty shops! The proposed ground is also used by the
community and could be used more with a little investment and
thought! The football clubs use this and bring families to Banff
that otherwise wouldn’t be in our town. It also brings locals to the
shops in area as we always go to the spotty bag shop when our
son has a game, bringing grandparents with us and we will pop
into the existing co-op and Tesco to get tea or nip the boys for a
hair cut whilst there. A supermarket is a good idea for the area,
just not at such a big detriment to the rest of businesses and
local facilities and groups… there are business parks in area
and other wasteland sites that could be built up and used,
bringing more people to Banff and not overcrowding one area of
the town that is working well for the community as it is. Having a
supermarket closer to the beach would be great on the edge of
town and bringing people to facilities at links and whitehills as
well as Banff, encouraging people to pick up picnic food or hot
take out food for after their wild swims during colder weather…
may encourage more people from Elgin side to come to Banff for
shopping and as a consequence they pass through Portsoy
making use of facilities and attracts there also.
Response
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Concerns around impact on other retailers has been noted and will be
included in the report to Area Committee
120
ID
Respondent
Name
Lynn Lawson
Representation
Response
I cannot believe this proposal is being considered. The Canal
Park is utilised on a regular basis, surely you can’t rob the
people of this fantastic space. We need to keep this beautiful
green area exactly as it has always been.
456243
Ryan
sutherland
I am happy to here that a big supermarket wants to come to
banff its been needed for a long time but not on the proposed
land would prefer it to be somewhere on outskirts .
456327
Auriel Bruce
There are other tranches of land available within the wider area,
primarily brown field sites, which should be used. While such
land is available it is not acceptable for common good land to be
sold. Reuse of brown field sites in either Banff of Macduff would
also meet the need of improving those areas.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by
s 222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
456125
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
121
ID
456572
457154
Respondent
Name
Craig Stewart
Deveronvale
FC
Banff
Preservation
and Heritage
Society and
Museum of
Banff
Representation
Response
All for a supermarket but not on canal park. Too many football
clubs will lose the grass pitch with no alternative. There’s not
enough grass pitches suitable for games as it stands. Can see
no benefit to the town as people from nearby towns have better
supermarkets anyway so not as if people will want to travel for a
Morrisons. May well create jobs however will cost others their
jobs. Canal park is also an area that lots of people use and
would be good to see the area upgraded rather than a
supermarket. So against Suoermarkwt on canal park.
As a Society we asked our 177 members for their views and
comments on the sale of Canal Park in Banff. Eighty one
percent of those who responded are against the sale of Canal
Park. The following points were made by our members: General
Points • The previous proposal to sell to Tesco met with, at best
from a sale angle, a mixed public response. • This proposal does
not come from a consensus in the community that either
development is desired or a Morrison's supermarket is desired. •
This proposal is being imposed on the local community in
isolation on a yes or no basis. Land Value •Land is a valuable
asset which can be used for different purposes over the years as
fashions come and go. If the land is sold then that flexibility to
change use e.g. to and from tennis courts, football field etc. is
lost. • Although land can depreciate in value over time it tends to
hold its value better than money. £1 in 1971 would buy much
more than £1 in 2021. •If the land is sold, how does the Council
propose to ensure that the price obtained retains the value
which the land would have held, especially if the value of money
is eroded by inflation? • Retail fashion changes over relatively
short periods of time. With more online shopping by customers
will another supermarket be viable? • The site may not be
purchased by Morrisons but by a property developer which will
lease to Morrisons so the ultimate owner is likely to have less
ties locally than Morrisons. • At the very least why is the land not
being leased to Morrisons, rather than sold e.g. for 25 years.
Effect on other businesses and employment • It is unlikely that
the local market will increase significantly so increased
employment by Morrisons is likely to be balanced by lost jobs
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy. It is noted there has been publicity
around discussions for other potential sites but to date none have been
brought forward. The precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted.
Concerns around impact on jobs is noted and will be included in the
report to Area Committee.
Design, listed building and built heritage
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on design and historic assets, Historic Scotland will be a
statutory consultee for the planning applications and , listed or
conservation consent.
Other site
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies
and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and, listed or conservation consent. SEPA will be a
statutory consultee on policies on flooding.
The site is being sold to Morrison and not another party
Engagement
This consultation is to seek the view of the community
Fact of closure of council offices and libraries for some of the
consultation period is accepted but this was mitigated by the extension
to the consultation period. There was a press release and notice
advertising the consultation and articles ran by local press on the
proposal. Community Councils and community bodies were all given
direct notification as required by statute and all were asked to bring it to
the attention of all people, they thought should be aware.
Representations have been received in letter as well as email format
and the number received would indicate that the community is fully
aware of the consultation.
122
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
elsewhere. • There is concern that installing a supermarket and
petrol station at Canal Park will not have a positive effect on
smaller businesses in the area but will actually impact very badly
on other business in competing for trade. • Further it does not sit
well with the Scottish Government’s aim to support independent
retailers and Aberdeenshire Council’s campaign for Shop Local
and ‘save the high street’ messages. • We should learn from
other towns and cities- the more big stores, the less an area has
to offer. Traffic and Bridge • Although the Council appears to
expect the existing Banff bridge to continue in service indefinitely
surely it is likely to be replaced at least for vehicular traffic and if
so would a new bridge be on the site of the existing bridge,
beside it or elsewhere and would any part of this land be
valuable as a laying down or storage area and an area where
site offices and facilities could be sited temporarily during
construction? • Banff Bridge would need to be looked at.
Alternative Sites • Most residents of Macduff would prefer a new
retail outlet to be sited in Macduff. Indeed that might offer the
opportunity to develop small retail and/or office/leisure or other
consumer orientated units nearby and add to local employment
opportunities. There might be less damage to existing retail
facilities and to Banff High Street. • The information given does
not take into account the needs of the Communities of Macduff
and Banff, what these Communities might want, how the needs
of the Communities might be met, where the communities of
Macduff and Banff might want facilities and if the Communities
would prefer to retain existing shopping facilities in preference to
replacing these with a new facility but if a new facility is to come
to the area consideration should be given to where the
Communities would wish it to be sited and if the Communities
would wish it to be stand alone or be part of a larger complex. •
Banff is not the right location for a supermarket. The original
impetus for attracting a supermarket was a demand by residents
for a bigger food store but it’s Macduff that sorely needs a
supermarket and there is retail land already identified by
Aberdeenshire Council for such a purpose. Green space and
Conservation area • If ever there has been a year, when the
The Council has complied with the requirements of the Community
Empowerment Act as far as it was possible to do so due to Covid
restrictions and taken steps to ensure these restrictions did not
prejudice the conduct of the consultation.
Concerns around loss of existing business has been noted.
Short term leases are not viable for commercial development as do not
give the security to reflect their investment. The site is being sold to
Morrison’s and not a 3rd party.
Traffic
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will
identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in
order to address any additional traffic generated as a result of the
development.
Green space
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that. Your comments are noted.
Flooding
123
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
benefits of green space have been shown to be of huge value, it
is the year we have just lived through. Once this area goes
under concrete, it will be lost forever. • The tennis courts could
be revamped, the netball area also and a bigger and better
skate park could be incorporated into this area while keeping the
open football pitch. • Towns should not sell off visible green
open space in a Conservation Area. There is no way we can
replace it with more in the Conservation Area. • To lose a green
space that was gifted to Banff and Macduff, and therefore the
residents, and to have it replaced by a commercial enterprise
seems a backward step in preserving the heritage and
environment of this area. • Yes we secured Duff house grounds
and got new sports facilities which was great, but we need to
preserve Banff’s uniqueness as an ancient and royal burgh.
• The fact that the site is located within a Conservation area and
Banff is an architecturally significant town with a unique
concentration of original vernacular buildings and is the third
settlement in Scotland after Edinburgh and Stirling to boast such
a status, should mean it is very important to protect the town and
its entrances. • The green open space at the entrance to Banff is
very important. • The visual impact of a modern ‘glassy’
supermarket at the entrance to historical Banff and on the built
heritage of this part of Banff would be detrimental. • Protection of
the historic monument of Banff town wall surrounding the site,
needs to be guaranteed. • In terms of attracting investment and
tourists to our area, the unique selling point for Banff and for our
beautiful area of coastline would surely be its remarkable
survival and intact heritage. We should be protecting what we
have and promoting this history as different and unique from say
Fraserburgh, Turriff, Inverurie and Peterhead. Do we really want
the first sight visitors see on entering the historic town to be a
large new supermarket, car park and petrol station? • A new
supermarket will also increase the traffic flow to the town and
pollution to a coastal area which is admired and enjoyed for its
open and green space. Demise of Town Centres caused by
large supermarkets • A number of Historic Burgh conferences
and other seminars have taught that tacking a supermarket on
124
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
the outskirts of a town, never leads to revitalising the town
centre, e.g. Huntly. Surely something more imaginative could be
achieved by using this area of ground for leisure pursuits. •
Huntly has one supermarket too many and it closed the small
shops in the town. • Another supermarket will diminish Banff
even further it won't promote any small businesses that may
think of returning to our high/low streets. Businesses will be
frightened off with yet another multi use store. The Co-op may
close as well as Tesco as they could not compete. Common
Good Land •It would be contrary to the Duke of Fife’s wish when
he gifted the land to Banff. It is important to retain it as a green
space. A supermarket would be completely unsuitable on that
site. A supermarket would spoil the view of Banff. • When the
land was gifted for Banff and Macduff in 1907, it was never
envisaged that a supermarket would be built upon it. • The plans
to sell off Common Good Land to a commercial enterprise is not
advisable. It is appreciated that this was already on the table in
negotiations with Tesco many years ago but we already know
that Tesco pulled out at the last minute due to a downturn in
their business after sitting on the site for years. This is still an
issue with big stores closing all over the country so what
guarantees do we have that this won’t happen again? • Once
Common Good assets are sold off there is no return and we lose
the heart of the town to an unknown future. Detrimental effects
on landscape and environment • Deliveries and Access and
parking issues would impinge on the residential nature of Bridge
Street and Airlie Gardens. • Flood risk. This locality is in medium
SEPA Flood risk area for coastal and river flooding. Do you have
any views on potential benefits of the proposal? • The proceeds
of the sale will go to local projects . Do you have any issues or
concerns arising from the proposal? Those who have expressed
support for the development of a supermarket by Morrisons
however have grave reservations on several fronts: •There is no
detailed planning application as yet in which some of these
concerns might be addressed. • Impact on local businesses
including Co-op, local filling stations and cafés is a huge
concern. Spotty Bag is extending its facilities so it would seem
125
ID
458022
Respondent
Name
Mr & Mrs R H
Finnis
Representation
the last thing we need is another coffee shop in that locale!
Other types of retail within a supermarket might be more useful.
• The supermarket will be designed with good access to the
main road and I suspect that very little of the footfall to the store
will venture any further and go straight back onto the main road,
thus relieving through traffic in Banff itself but of course taking
their custom away from the local shops and reducing the benefit
to the local people of Banff which is what the land was gifted for
in the first place. • The size of the development. It is probably the
same size as all the High and Low Street shops put together.
This will have a massive impact on them. It is sad enough
already that there are so many empty shops but this will create
more. • There will of course soon be a derelict empty site where
the Co-op now is, as people will just drive past it to get to
Morrisons. Do you have any additional Questions or comments?
• There was huge concern that the sale was being considered
with absolutely no idea of what the plan for the space was.
There is no plan of the shop, car park and petrol station. • There
was no indication how much of the original wall would be kept. •
People couldn’t believe that the town would give up such a
valuable asset without having detailed information on the
consequences. • Proceeds if sold must be ring fenced within the
Common Good - not raided by the Council.
Like nothing before it, Covid-19 highlights the enormous
importance of open spaces for the mental and physical
wellbeing of people, everywhere. Why choose to lose, for all
time, such a well-used and valued local open space? For a
shop, the "footfall" for which will come in vehicles bringing
increased traffic problems, to the detriment of health and the
environment? Morrisons faces a buy-out bid from a US private
equity firm which could change the entire ethos of the business.
And the Council's hope of building starting in 2 years - what
happens to that? A responsible local authority should not be
looking to sell Common Good land to any supermarket, privately
owned or (currently) publicly quoted. Greater breadth of vision
and thought from our elected Councillors are required, and the
Response
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities and the delivery of
Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty opportunity to continue
to provide opportunities to assist health and wellbeing via sport. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon access to that.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
126
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
proposed sell-off should be abandoned, for the benefit of all,
present and future.
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
Morrisons have been bought over but have confirmed their commitment
with proceeding with the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies as regards mitigation and impact on the environment.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
Any sale is subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a
Common Good Order from the court, and obtaining planning consent.
458388
PATRICIA
MCCARTNE
Y
I am all for a Morrison’s supermarket in the area but certainly not
at the canal park.
458649
Debbie Keith
458654
Christine Sim
I do not want Canal Park to be used as any supermarket, in a
world of climate change and technology we need to protect our
heritage and green spaces, at the moment Canal Park is used
for many clubs, children and adults and it should be kept that
way. The pressure of increased traffic over Banff Bridge plus the
close proximity of an established Tesco and Co-Op as well as a
Morrison supermarket will be detrimental to the appearance of
the entrance Banff. I am not opposed to a Morrison supermarket
coming to the area but it should be placed elsewhere. I feel that
the residents should have had more consultation before allowing
6 people to vote out of an entire community on this very
important issue and that this project has not been debated
enough before Morrisons was decided as the preferred bidder. It
is land belonging to this community and its fate should have
been decided by a majority vote from Banff and Macduff
residents and not behind closed doors.
The area should be kept for recreation.
458832
Caroline
Hobbs
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
1. I strongly oppose the proposal to sell the land at Canal Park
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
to Morrisons for a supermarket. The land should remain as
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
Common Good Ground. 2. I can see no benefits AT ALL of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
proposal. 3. Once the land is sold, the community would have no there is a need within the community for such facilities.
say in what happens to the space. Already there is uncertainty
127
ID
458888
Respondent
Name
Ainsley
Gardiner
Representation
Response
over the future of Morrisons which is in the middle of a take over
bid. The proposed supermarket will NOT be a superstore
drawing people to the area. The envisaged "Market Street
concept" will provide an easy, quick access to it's store and will
be used as a drive through convenience taking business away
from local independent shops and cafes. By incorporating "inhouse specialists such as butchers, fishmonger, bakery and
fresh prep" Morrisons will be taking business away from the
firms already providing this provision in Banff and Macduff. We
should be supporting the local businesses that exist. The land is
used by various football clubs who voice concerns about the
loss of such a facility for youngsters. This Common Good land
should be protected for their future health, enjoyment and well
being. 4. This green land should stay green and should be
improved so that as well as supporting the current users, it
provides an interesting attraction to residents and visitors. I am
sure that with imagination the area could be enhanced to
provide space for an outdoor market, outdoor gym and a small
outdoor music/theatre venue for example. Let's make it an
interesting place to visit and enjoy and keep it as Common Good
Land.
One of my many concerns of Morrison’s being built is the
flooding situation. How far is the water going to go up Bridge
Street if it is given the go ahead? Will my cellar & house get
flooded? Will I need to keep sandbags at my gate permanently
just in case? Another concern is the traffic. I’ve just spent a wee
while trying to turn right at St Mary’s car park junction. Not a
problem for me as I wasn’t in a rush but the big lorry in front of
me wasn’t so patient & after waiting a while he had had enough
& went for it, causing cars coming on either side to brake & 1 of
them swerved towards me. If a Morrison’s is built then there’s
going to be even more traffic. And of course there’s Canal Park
itself. There’s a misunderstanding among many that it’s never
used but it is used by footballers & locals & it would be a crying
shame to lose it & be replaced by a supermarket & car park. The
footballers would lose their affordable grass pitch & we would
lose the beautiful view everyone sees when they enter/leave
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
and these will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Morrison have been bought over but have reaffirmed their commitment
to developing the store
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in
respect of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant
statutes and Scheme of Delegation. The precedent of a supermarket
on this site has already been established with previous planning and
statutory consents being granted.
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies on
flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications whose comments will be fed into the design and the
application. The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need for any
development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to be
prohibitive to development.
128
ID
Respondent
Name
459670
Stanley West
459715
Kathleen
460198
Mhairi
MCKEAN
Representation
Response
Banff. Do we really want to see an ugly building there? We’re
still going through a pandemic. Is this really the time to be selling
our land with so many large well established companies going
into administration? The future of actual physical shops has
never been so uncertain & selling right now seems crazy. And
the only public consultations we can have is online, no actual
physical meetings. And…….Morrisons are possibly in the middle
of a takeover just now by a private equity firm. Their last offer
was rejected because it was too low but the firm has until July
17th to place a higher bid. This consultation ends in a couple of
days time. My questions are, if the takeover goes ahead of
course - Will Aberdeenshire Council still want to sell to a private
equity firm? - Will a new consultation have to be made up if it
does? - Will they want to build a new supermarket in Banff if the
land is eventually sold or will it be just an asset for the firm to
keep a hold of? Or sell to someone else? Even if a takeover
doesn’t happen what’s stopping another one in the future? At the
moment we don’t know who it’s being sold to Once it’s sold it’s
sold & we will have no say in what could go in there.
A Transport Assessment will also be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
There was significant work undertaken around usage of the land and
the council are aware of the current and previous usage which was
used to develop the Aberdeenshire pitch strategy
Respondent made no comment.
1. I personally think it’s about time that there was new business
coming into Banff, it’s so we’ll overdue. Since Tesco ditched
Banff with empty promises of building a new store but, had to
keep to the deal of the Sports Centres, I really do think the folk o
Banff/Macduff/Whitehills/Portsoy will spend more time in Banff
promoting local businesses.
Do you have any comments on the proposals by Aberdeenshire
Council to sell the Common Good Land to Wm Morrison
Supermarkets plc for a Supermarket? I do not believe that the
Common Good land should be sold. The entrance to Banff is
lovely and should not be replaced with concrete, tarmac and
glass. It is part of the parkland surrounding Duff House and
makes a beautiful view as you come home to Banff down the
Howe. The Common Good land is an asset for Banff and in this
last year, the fact that we stay in such a brilliant, seaside, rural
location has been a huge benefit to all of us. The many
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
129
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
recreational, open spaces is a very attractive feature in Banff
and Macduff. Canal Park is well used by many. The loss of this
recreational area will not be easily replaced elsewhere. On the
local plan, the land is marked as a Conservation area and Town
Centre, although it is in fact, the edge of Banff, as delineated by
the River Deveron. Alternative sites should be considered e.g.
the brownfield site of the old chicken factory on Tannery Street.
A supermarket here would serve the growing population at the
top of the town. The other possible retail site would be at Myrus /
Corskie Drive in Macduff which is zoned for retail, if indeed
another supermarket, very similar to what is offered already in
the town is needed. People travel to other towns for a change,
not because you can’t get everything you need in Banff and
Macduff. Equally people travel to Banff to experience different
shops and attractions e.g. The Spotty Bag shop, Imagine and
the many independent retailers, cafes and restaurants we have
available. People will still leave the town to visit larger retail
centres, even if you put another supermarket here. It was raised
as an environmental benefit, that travel would be reduced, but
people will still travel to shop. Replacing the grass with tarmac
and concrete is not an environmentally friendly act and will only
speed up the overland flow of rainfall in to the Deveron, leading
to additional flood risk. This area is part of the Potentially
Vulnerable Area in Banff and has a Flood Risk Management
Strategy in Place. Why choose to add buildings to this area
when part of the Flood Risk Management Strategy includes
relocation of people and services from potentially vulnerable
areas. SEPA’s North East Local Plan includes the following:
“Land use planning decisions are one of the most powerful tools
available to manage flood risk. The alignment of flood risk
management and land use planning policy is pivotal to achieving
sustainable flood risk management. Decisions relating to flood
risk management can have significant implications for the
location of development and, likewise, decisions relating to the
location of development can impact on flood risk. Land use
planning has the potential to contribute to sustainable flood risk
management through the location, use and design of new
planning applications and , listed or conservation consent. It is noted
there has been publicity around discussions for other potential sites but
to date none have been brought forward.
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies
and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and, listed or conservation consent. SEPA will be a
statutory consultee on policies on flooding.
Fact of closure of council offices and libraries for some of the
consultation period is accepted but this was mitigated by the extension
to the consultation period. There was a press release and notice
advertising the consultation and articles ran by local press on the
proposal.
Community Councils and community bodies were all given direct
notification as required by statute and all were asked to bring it to the
attention of all people, they thought should be aware. Representations
have been received in letter as well as email format and the number
received would indicate that the community is fully aware of the
consultation.
The Council has complied with the requirements of the Community
Empowerment Act as far as it was possible to do so due to Covid
restrictions and taken steps to ensure these restrictions did not
prejudice the conduct of the consultation. Concerns around loss of
existing business has been noted and will be included in the report to
Area Committee
130
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
development and the redevelopment of existing areas.” The
Plan also states that “new development in areas with medium to
high likelihood of flooding should be avoided.” This area has a
medium risk of flooding, according to SEPA’s Flood maps. When
people travel to a larger retail centre to shop, they tend to go to
the large shop and then come home because many of these
supermarkets are on the outskirts of towns for easy access as
this one would be and therefore people may not go further in to
the town. As pointed out in the consultation, the worry is that
another supermarket will be the death knell for our local town
centre shops, just when things are looking more promising. The
whole campaign for the last few years has been about
rejuvenating the town centre and there are some small signs in
Banff that the local businesses are fighting back – shown by the
recent start-up businesses and the fact that our extremely good
local butcher’s shop continues to flourish under new
management, after the previous owner retired. The
regeneration of Bridge Street will help with this process. If
people want the products available in larger stores, they tend to
order goods on line but during the lockdown, the growth of local
businesses offering top quality goods, delivered to your door
was incredible and not something that any of us should take for
granted. Morrisons doesn’t offer anything that we don’t already
have, provided by Tescos, Co-op and Spotty Bag. Many of the
150 jobs on offer from Morrisons, will be part time and may well
be jobs lost elsewhere when local businesses are put under
stress and so the net gain for the area will be negligible. Do you
have any views on potential benefits of the proposal? I can’t see
any benefits of the proposal. Do you have any issues or
concerns arising from the proposal? I have huge concerns
around the proposal, namely the demise of our existing
businesses, leaving many town centre buildings derelict. The
destruction of the entrance to Banff is a huge issue and the
destruction of more of our town’s heritage. Banff’s heritage is
really important and if we want to develop the tourist industry,
we have to give tourists something different to visit, namely a
beautiful seaside town, not a mass of boring, modern concrete
131
ID
460269
Respondent
Name
Fiona
Duckett
Representation
and glass. Building new facilities in a Potentially Vulnerable
Flood Area. Do you have any additional Questions or
comments? The whole consultation process is unsatisfactory.
There has been no opportunity for face to face meetings –
clearly this is difficult with the Covid restrictions - but the sale of
Common Good Land, one of the town’s best assets, should not
to be taken lightly.
Canal park is not the place to create a new Supermarket for the
people of Banff and Macduff. Your own consultation on provision
of sports fields says you don't have enough to cope with peak
times without Canal Park and yet you don't appear to have an
alternative. It is common good land and as such should not be
sold to any Supermarket to use it as they see fit - there are
plenty of other available spaces in and around the two towns.
Access is stated to be via the B9142 but that is off the A98 and
just a few 100 metres from the bridge over the Deveron that
barely copes now with the flow of traffic on occasions now and
large lorries create even more problems. No one has mentioned
that this is an area that floods regularly when the correct
conditions occur. Tescos 'pricing' policy has already seen the
death of at least two independent food shops in Banff and one
would imagine that Morrisons 'pricing' policy will be very similar.
Supermarket petrol stations do not encourage competition they
can and do underprice smaller petrol stations often selling the
fuel for less than the smaller garages can buy it for and are quite
happy to use fuel as a loss leader to encourage customers to
visit the store. I can see no potential benefits to this proposal
and although views and green space are not thought to be that
important in planning terms - the view of the mouth of the
Deveron with both towns in it is often used to encourage people
to visit us - I don't even want to think about what it will look if it
become a supermarket.
Response
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money.
The Pitch Strategy supports the creation of pitch forums, with
representatives from all user groups, local sports hubs, landscape
services, and third-party owners of sports sites .The forum would agree
principles of scheduling amongst user groups.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
132
ID
Respondent
Name
460359
Lorna Murray
460564
Pamela
Singer
Representation
I think a decent supermarket is needed if our town is to grow and
develop. It will bring people to the town and benefit other
businesses. The site is good and focusses development on the
lower part of the town already attracting people to Spotty Bags.
For a short summer spell part of the land is used for sport in the
evening but there is ample opportunity for shared sports ground
to be developed either in Duff House grounds or shared with
Banff Academy. Ground there is used in the day and term time
only. The benefits to Banff of having a good supermarket far out
way any concern. Many people travel out with to bigger
supermarkets. They won’t need to do this anymore, business will
stay in the town, other businesses will prosper from visitors to
the town and there will be greater opportunities for employment.
I don't think the land should be sold at all, it is common good
land that is being USED frequently by all ages. I'm not opposed
to a supermarket as I do believe it would be good for the area,
but certainly not built on land that's being used and not there.
Next to another supermarket and in the main view as you enter
the town. It's the people's town, their land, leave it to be utilised
by the people and build elsewhere. Plenty other locations that
are more than suitable that aren't being used at all!
Response
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies on flooding and design. SEPA will be a statutory consultee for
the planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design
and the application. The council and are Morrison’s aware of the need
for any development to address flooding issues but do not consider this
to be prohibitive to development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
Your comments are noted on impact on other businesses.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
133
ID
Respondent
Name
460572
Dean spruce
461073
Aileen Clark
Representation
I think it’s a great idea to sell the land to be used as a
supermarket.
1. Inappropriate use of common good funds. Land should be
kept for leisure not retail particularly following the need for free
space during Covid and mental health crises.- check other
appropriate sites which are suitable for development - Macduff
Industrial estate, Banff near new housing. 2. Given the increase
in online shopping /home deliveries of groceries during
pandemic grocery store model should have changed. Existing
stores particularly independents eg Spotty Bag, newsagents,
chemists,butchers, bakers,diy will stand to lose trade and jobs.
Jobs created will unlikely be much different from current jobs
and will result in store closures etc. I find the selection of goods
at local stores/delivery options totally adequate and in the
current environmental situation we should not be encouraging
large retail stores with poor environmental and ethical records. If
people are interested in saving a penny here or there they
should try growing their own vegetables and looking at
seasonally and locally produced foods.
Response
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation. The precedent of a supermarket on this
site has already been established with previous planning and statutory
consents being granted. Any planning application will have to have
regard to relevant policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory
consultee for the planning applications and, listed or conservation
consent. It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for
other potential sites but to date none have been brought forward.
There was significant work undertaken and the council are aware of the
current and previous usage which was used to develop the
Aberdeenshire pitch strategy
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation. When it comes to affecting local businesses
the store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. However it
also can generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be
dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and
may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
134
ID
Respondent
Name
461097
Kevin Sinclair
461107
Alison
Temple
Rachel
Kennedy,
Ivy's
Emporium
462768
Representation
Full favour for a growing town.. everyone we know travel out of
town for a big shop.. rather see people coming here and seeing
what a great town we have to offer 👍
Response
Your comments are noted in respect of the impact on other businesses,
and these will be included in the report to Area Committee
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Respondent made no comment.
1 What are your views on the proposed disposal by way of a
sale for a supermarket I strongly object to the proposed sale of
Canal Park to a supermarket because I object to the sale of
Common Good Land for commercial development. I also object
to the proposed site when land suitable for retail development is
already identified in Macduff in the Council’s Area Plan. I
strongly object to the sale for a supermarket which will dominate
local businesses already in operation, especially given that the
total population of the area is very modest, around 8,000. 2 Do
you have any views on potential benefits of the proposalA Wm
Morrison Supermarket in the area would provide additional
shopping and choice for our community but not at the cost of
losing the football pitch and view that makes Banff so special
and helps to bring people to this part of the world. 3 Do you have
any issues or concerns arising from the proposal Common Good
- My main objection to this proposal is the permanent loss of
Common Good land that would result from the sale if it were to
go ahead, as once the land has been sold there is going back. It
is lost forever. I am hugely concerned that such a prime site
within the historic town of Banff should be in private ownership
and I am concerned that a green grass area will be concreted
over and developed. I also think that the football pitch should not
be taken away from the various sports groups who use it on a
regular basis. There are over 700 children who play there as
well as the Banff Rovers football club who have been around
since the 1930s. Impact on the environment – the creation of a
large build commercial development on a green site will
undoubtedly have a knock on effect on the environment. The
location is totally wrong for a modern glass box structure which
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Furthermore when it comes to the sale of land Common Good land is
owned by Aberdeenshire Council but administered separately from
other local authority property. Vested by s 222 Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local Government etc. (Scotland)
Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm that in administering
common good property the authority must have regard to the interests
of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the Council’s responsibility to
Common Good, it must consider use of assets in addition to maintaining
the historical aspect. It is understood this can often be difficult to
reconcile but sale is considered to be best use of this asset for the
inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect of the common good
are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes and Scheme of
Delegation. Furthermore, the precedent of a supermarket on this site
has already been established with previous planning and statutory
consents being granted. Any planning application will have to have
regard to relevant policies as regards mitigation and impact on the
environment. The provision of supermarket for residents as opposed to
travelling to Huntly or Elgin could also help reduce carbon footprint.
visual pollution. When it comes to impacting local businesses the store
has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff. Increased
competition may result in a negative impact on other food, comparison,
café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. However it can also
generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be
dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and
135
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
would appear to be Morrisons signature style. There will be a
huge amount of glass, metal and concrete replacing a grass
pitch (which was an open field before that) and I do not see that
as progress, especially at a time when we are fighting serious
climate change issues and our Government is working towards a
greener agenda. As a local business owner based on Bridge
Street nearby, I am identified in the Consultation as a business
‘that could benefit’ from Morrisons coming to Banff. I am not
convinced however that Morrisons will bring customers to my
door. I have not benefitted from the coach loads of visitors
coming to shop in the Spotty Bag, which is experiencing an
incredibly busy summer. My customers are mostly locals and
special interest folk who come to Banff to go to my shop. I also
attract visitors to Banff from the fairs that I organise and the
CAVA (Craft, Art, Vintage and Antiques) trail leaflet that I
administer, so I don’t anticipate any great change or benefit
there. Where I do see an impact, however, is in the negative
affect Morrisons would have on the smaller independent
businesses already established in the town. Morrisons are
offering a ‘market’ shopping experience to imitate the high
street, which is exactly what we are already offering, with
bakers, a butcher, flower shops, etc on an actual high street!
Morrisons fish, meat and flowers stalls, their proposed cafe and
petrol station, will undoubtedly have a negative impact on our
local businesses, quite apart from the Spotty Bag and CoOp
alongside the site in lower Banff who will possibly really struggle.
We are not talking about healthy competition here, we are
talking about a national supermarket chain dominating and
undercutting the market due to their greater buying power and
resources. Unlike local businesses whose income mostly stays
within the area Morrisons income leaves the area and its
purpose is to benefit its shareholders. Conservation - Banff is an
architecturally significant town and the proposed site is within a
Conservation Area, so I am astonished that this site has even
been considered. A glass and concrete development right at the
entrance to the two towns is madness. It will destroy the natural
setting of the river and coast and very likely create traffic flow
may also improve customer choice and cost of goods. When it comes to
the loss of the land, the loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt
with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in
improving community and sporting provision locally to the value of
£12.5 million pounds in recent years. This investment, after
engagement with the community, took the form of new sporting facilities
comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports
Complex in Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring
it to Scottish Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider
community use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further
improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be
possible to enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by
undertaking improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff
Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could include enhancing the
drainage, floodlighting and maintenance, amongst other things, and
mitigation such as improving the co-ordination of access by users.
Any other potential large-scale sports or community projects may be
subject to a separate public consultation to decide the best use of
Common Good money. When it comes to affecting local businesses
The store has a potential displacement effect on other retailers in Banff.
Increased competition may result in a negative impact on other food,
comparison, café and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff. however,
the store can also generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area,
which is an opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This
will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of
access and may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
A lease is not considered suitable by elopers of retail developments for
a site such as this .
136
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
problems that will stop customers before they have even entered
the area. With Aberdeenshire Council’s pioneering support for
regenerating The Vinery and The Smiddy alongside Canal Park,
the proposal to build a modern supermarket here seems very
much at odds with the sensitive and complimentary development
of Banff’s period buildings. 4 Additional comments I strongly
object to the sale of Common Good land for any commercial
development, especially involving a company that is currently
vulnerable to a takeover bid by an American private equity
business. Secondly, my observation from 16 years working in
Banff and Macduff area in arts, culture and tourism and latterly
in retail, is that Banff and Macduff (albeit to a lesser degree) are
in a unique position to offer visitors a very special experience
that is quite unlike Fraserburgh, Peterhead, Huntly, Inverurie,
Elgin, etc. We have a beautiful coastal location with historic
buildings that are culturally and architecturally significant (eg
Duff House, Banff Castle, Tarlair pool to name a few) and we
know that tourism in Scotland is a huge income generator with
untapped potential. The latest update from Visit Scotland is that
Scotland is second on the list after Cornwall for popular holiday
destinations (May 2021, VS Area Director). We have capacity
here on the Banffshire Coast to benefit from this massive
upsurge in interest together with all the families moving in to the
area and buying up properties which I have observed first hand
in my shop during and after COVID lockdown. Thirdly, I object to
selling off a well-used amenity that brings so much benefit to
over 700 children and their families. The benefit for young
players to be close to Deveronvale FC is about aspiration and
investment in their future as well as learning ball skills. This is
hard to assess in monetary benefit perhaps but sometimes
money isn’t everything and with COVID still very much a reality,
it’s imperative that the younger members of our community are
encouraged to stay fit and healthy and that vulnerable members
of our community with mental health issues are supported by
access to open space that is easily accessible on foot in the
heart of the town. The original Gift from the Duke of Fife was to
benefit the two towns by an ongoing facility, not to sell to the
137
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
highest bidder when resources are straightened. It should never
be put up for sale. Why hasn’t a lease been considered?
462892
Alasdair Gray
I do not believe that the negative environmental impact of a new
supermarket building and all associated utilities has been fully
assessed and balanced. More work should be done to either
plant trees, grow seagrass or, in other ways, account for the
increased negative carbon impact that the site will have over all
the years that it will be there for. Morrison Supermarkets are not
as well positioned as some of their rivals in terms of their
approach to fair-trade and well-being and the wider societal
ethics of a shop managed by a business which will not be as
interested in looking after the local community as they should be
should be fully considered.
462921
Flora
Grabowska
1. Views on ‘disposal’ for supermarket. I am not against
Morrison’s or any other supermarket but I am vehemently
against sacrificing prime green space at the mouth of the
Deveron to pave it over and plonk a supermarket on it. This is
not waste ground that needs development, this is well used
open ground which could be further used for outdoor activities in
fresh air. There is the likelihood of an Aldi’s in Macduff which
currently has no supermarket. 2. Views on potential benefits of
the proposal. Any potential benefits of adding a smaller
Morrison’s or other supermarket are dwarfed by the irretrievable
loss of green space. Banff already has Tesco’s and Co-op, both
of which contribute £ in community support. 3. Issues. A) loss of
green space currently well used by youth and adults for football.
B) loss of attractive approach to Banff from the Deveron Bridge
or looking down from Macduff Church or Temple of Venus. C)
potentially exacerbating flood conditions by adding a large
building and paving for carpark D) increased exhaust fumes
from increased traffic parking and leaving E) increased HGVs
crossing the Deveron Bridge F) there are far more suitable
locations for the supermarket proponents want, e.g. Macduff
Industrial estate. 4. Additional comments. Green space in such
a unique location close to wildlife as the Deveron flows into the
Morrisons has a strong Corporate Social Responsibility ethos with own
brand foods labelled with Guideline Daily Amounts and customers are
provided with information about healthy eating. Morrisons are leading
the way with reducing plastic packaging and now avoid food waste by
stocking a ‘Wonky Veg’ range which is proving very popular with
customers. When it comes to pollution The precedent of a supermarket
on this site has already been established with previous planning and
statutory consents being granted. Any planning application will have to
have regard to relevant policies as regards mitigation and impact on the
environment.
The provision of supermarket for residents as opposed to travelling to
Huntly or Elgin could also help reduce carbon footprint.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use.
Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements and
mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users .Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
when it comes to traffic a Transport Assessment will be necessary as
part of any future planning application. This will involve an assessment
of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will
identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to
138
ID
462924
Respondent
Name
Neil
Sievewright
Representation
Response
sea should be enhanced not ‘disposed’ of by building a
supermarket. I have yet to see any such that visually enhance
the environment.
address any additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Furthermore, The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already
been established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent. Lastly, The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted. Any
planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies on
flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications whose comments will be fed into the design and the
application. The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need for any
development to address flooding issues but do not consider this to be
prohibitive to development.
The loss of the pitch has already been mostly dealt with, as
Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in improving
community and sporting provision locally to the value of £12.5 million
pounds in recent years. This investment, after engagement with the
community, took the form of new sporting facilities comprising the
Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports Complex in
Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring it to Scottish
Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider community
use. Aberdeenshire Council will be considering further improvements
and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it could be possible to
enhance existing grass pitch provision elsewhere by undertaking
improvements to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus
& Duff House. This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting
and maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as
improving the co-ordination of access by users. Any other potential
large-scale sports or community projects may be subject to a separate
public consultation to decide the best use of Common Good money.
When regarding traffic a Transport Assessment will be necessary as
part of any future planning application. This will involve an assessment
139
Although I no longer reside in Banff,I was born and raised a
'Banffer'.I maintain a fondness for and interest in it and most of
my family still live there.The decline of Banff in recent years has
been sad to see and I agree that it needs regeneration.The
proposed Morrisons supermarket is not ,however,the solution in
my opinion. The loss of green space and playing fields given the
concern about obesity and a less active population,especially
among children,could have a detrimental effect on physical and
mental health. The potential loss of local sporting teams by the
loss of Canal Park could weaken,not 'strengthen sense of place
and identity'*. Banff's 'striking coastal situation' * will be
diminished by the sight of a vast ,soul-less structure greeting
visitors arriving via the bridge,not 'protect the coastal character
and setting'*.Neither will this 'protect and enhance the role and
attractiveness of the town as a tourist and visitor destination'*.
Increased traffic turning right from the bridge towards the
supermarket and also traffic turning right onto the main road will
cause congestion and possibly accidents as well as a decline in
air quality in that area.Increased HGV deliveries could also have
ID
463103
Respondent
Name
D McIntosh
Representation
Response
a detrimental effect on the structure of Banff Bridge. Morrisons
claim that the new supermarket will create 150-175 jobs.On the
face of it this is to be welcomed,however many of these jobs will
be part-time and will not be new,only displaced.Their 'Market
Street' concept of in-store bakery,butcher and fishmonger outlets
will likely cause the demise of locally-owned businesses of that
nature.This will increase the number of vacant shops in Banff
and Macduff. Many people welcome the increased competition
and lower prices which this supermarket will bring.However,once
they have eliminated the local competition and have a virtual
monopoly there will be no incentive to keep their prices low. If
Banff is to have a new supermarket then the former Grampian
Chickens site would seem to be more suitable.It is much more
convenient for most residents and would avoid many of the
concerns which I have raised above. I hope that the council
make their decision based on the Common Good for the people
of Banff and Macduff.I would hate to see the day when Banff is
known only for Morrisons and the Spotty Bag! * All quotes from
Aberdeenshire Council Local Development Plan
From the information provided by Aberdeenshire Council, it is
very difficult to make an informed judgement on the community
benefit that would arise from a sale of this Common Good Land
to a Supermarket.The suggestion that a new Supermarket and
associated jobs (not taking into account jobs lost from
businesses adversely affected), and an unknown receipt for the
sale of the ground is appropriate compensation for the loss of a
well used and much loved green space is far from detailed
enough. Parts of the area involved have been left to deteriorate
over the years due to the long running Tesco saga. As has been
ruled in other cases, this should not be used as an argument for
disposal. The council has had responsibility for the maintenance
of this land and associated property. The final issue is that,
based on information available online, the value of the land in
2013 was over £7,000,000. According to the current Common
Good accounts, the value of Canal Park is now a fraction of that
amount. The community should be informed if and why the value
of the land appears to have reduced so dramatically. It is unfair
of the capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will
identify any areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to
address any additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted. When it
comes to negatively impacting business The store has a potential
displacement effect on other retailers in Banff. Increased competition
may result in a negative impact on other food, comparison, café and
petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff, However the store also is likely to
generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area, which is an
opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This will be
dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of access and
may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
The ormer tennis courts and were replaced with new ones as part of
the new facilities at school but areas which still in use have been
maintained
The benefits of Morrisons are Accessibility: the new store will provide
access for the residents of the Banff/Macduff area to larger format retail
provision and particularly for those in the town who do not have access
to their own transport to visit similar premises in other towns.
Employment: a significant number of jobs could be created as a result
of this development, both during construction and in the supermarket’s
operation. Morrisons estimates 150 to 175 jobs for the store’s operation.
Choice and competition: It is possible that the development will reduce
the cost of grocery, fuel, and other goods to residents by introducing
competition. Residents will have access to an additional retail offering,
meaning travel to other areas is
less necessary or not required. People out with the immediate
catchment area may travel to use the supermarket, bringing additional
footfall and potential benefits to other town centre retail.
Visual Impact & Stimulation: The development involves demolishing the
140
ID
463166
Respondent
Name
L hall
Representation
Response
to ask the community to respond to a consultation when all the
facts are not made available to them.
old Bridge Street Community Centre, which will reduce the look of
dereliction in the lower part of the street and may help stimulate other
financial investment and property owners in the vicinity to make positive
changes to their properties. There may be interest from other
enterprises in locating in the same part of town to take advantage of the
increased footfall in this area. When it comes to depreciation of the land
due to negligence the common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire
Council but administered separately from other local authority property.
Vested by s 222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by
s15 Local Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer
provisions confirm that in administering common good property the
authority must have regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the
area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but the proposed
sale is considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the
area. All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in
compliance with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
If the sale proceeds, the common good fund will be in receipt of a
substantial sum. The council already extracted a significant capital
contribution from the site to allow Tesco to withdraw from previous deal
to sell the site and which was used to partly fund the new sports and
leisure facilities in Banff and Macduff.
Any drop in value has been due to change in commercial value of
development land opposed to any actions of the Council but as noted
above a significant receipt can still be generated.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
141
There must be better sites than using one of the very few green
spaces Banff has. Pretty sure this land was gifted to the people
and is not for the council to go selling off to the highest bidder.
I’m not against the supermarket, just the location
ID
Respondent
Name
463183
James A
Duncanson
463272
Jean
Stevenson
Representation
Fantastic for the bigger local community, Competition for Co Op
(over priced) and Tesco’s (limited selection and facilities), None
as competition will be good
I am not in favour of selling this land to anyone. Also, only those
resident in Macduff and Banff should have their views
considered since the land was left to them, not the outlying
towns and villages. I see no benefit in having another store in
this location, only concerns. Traffic and parking in this area are
already causing congestion. Any store there would be competing
with local town centre shops. Our ancient Banff bridge cannot
cope with two lorries/busses meeting on the bridge as it is. It is a
danger to pedestrians. More lorries, every day would only
exacerbate the situation. Macduff, on the other hand, has no
supermarket but plenty spare land. We could accommodate an
Aldi at Myrus and an Asda or Home Bargains at Old Gamrie
Road. Nobody is against a supermarket, in the right place, but
Morrison’s may not be the best choice at present with it being
subject to a takeover. Our green space at Canal Park is too
precious to be concreted over.
Response
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
The benefit of access to green space and sport on health and wellbeing
is recognised but previous new facilities
and the delivery of Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy will ensure plenty
opportunity to continue to provide opportunities to assist health and
wellbeing via sport. The council undertook an Open Space Strategy
Audit, and which last updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high
proportion of accessible open space, at over 60%, so not considered
this proposal would impact upon access to that.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation. The purpose of the consultation is to
ascertain the views of the people of Banff and the surrounding area
regarding the proposed sale of this common good land to Wm
Morrisons plc as the preferred bidders this includes whether ot not there
is a need within the community for such facilities. The consultation is
not seeking views in terms of alternative providers. Any sale will be
subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a Common Good
Order. The potential benefits and impacts in terms of the disposal will
therefore required to be weighted as part of the decision making
142
ID
463295
463311
Respondent
Name
Neil Clarke
Jamieson
Shearer
Representation
Response
Bringing in a corporate body means that local businesses will
suffer; this is an area with a lot of potential for independent
businesses but with no support from the council it will not be
possible for them to set up
process. If the land is sold the funds received will form part pf the Banff
& Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which
is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit
of the people of Banff and Macduff. We note that you support a new
supermarket in the area but not at the proposed location. When it
comes to alternative locations it is noted there has been publicity
around discussions for other potential sites but to date none have been
brought forward. The precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted. Your comments are noted in respect of the availability of
other sites. The Canal Park site has been allocated for commercial
retail use in terms of the Local Development Plan and the proposals fall
within this classification. A planning application will need to be
separately submitted for consideration. The design, layout, nuisance
and visual impact of the proposed store will be considered as part of the
planning application process and a proper Transport Assessment will
be undertaken to look at the capacity / operation of the existing
transport network and the interventions / mitigations that are necessary
to address any additional traffic generated as a result of the
development. A Retail Impact Assessment will also be undertaken as
part of the process which will assess the potential benefits and impacts
that the development will have on the town centre and existing retail
within Banff. Your comments are noted. We are not in a position to
comment on Wm Morrison's financial or business position. When it
comes to the loss of green space The council undertook an Open
Space Strategy Audit, which was last updated in 2019 and noted that
Banff has a high proportion of accessible open space, at over 60%, so it
is not considered this proposal would impact upon the access to that.
A Retail Impact Assessment will be undertaken as part of the process
which will assess the potential benefits and impacts that the
development will have on the town centre and existing retail within
Banff.
Why o why would you want to sell Common ground currently
used as a Sports Field for another supermarket. There must be
Your comments have been noted and will be highlighted to Banff and
Buchan area committee.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
143
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
other land available in a Town the size of Banff which could be
used without having to lose a Sports facility. Surely the Council
should be encouraging activity in all ages to reduce the pressure
on the NHS especially now in this Pandemic. Also once a
Sports Field is lost you will never replace it. If its all about
Money surely a Sports Trust could take on the Ground and run it
for the benefit of the people of Banff and surrounding area. As
mentioned above there must be vacant areas that could be
developed for a Supermarket. Too often the "big" supermarkets
seem to get their way when the views of Local residents are
ignored. This is the Councils chance to do the right thing.
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities. Any sale is
subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a Common Good
Order, and obtaining planning consent. Legal terms are still to be
finalised. The potential benefits and impact of any disposal requires to
be weighted as part of the decision making process.
A planning application will need to be separately submitted for
consideration. Members of the public will of course have the
opportunity to comment on the planning application as soon as the
applicant's proposals have been made clear. It is noted there has been
publicity around discussions for other potential sites but to date none
have been brought forward. The precedent of a supermarket on this
site has already been established with previous planning and statutory
consents being granted. The Canal Park site has been allocated for
commercial retail use in terms of the Local Development Plan and the
proposals fall within this classification. If the land is sold the funds
received will form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds held
by Aberdeenshire Council administered by the Banff & Buchan Area
Committee for the benefit of the people of Banff and Macduff. The loss
of the pitch has mostly been dealt with, as following the collapse of the
Tesco deal, Aberdeenshire Council has made significant investment in
improving community and sporting provision locally to the value of
£12.5 million pounds in recent years. This investment, after
engagement with the community, took the form of new sporting facilities
comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff and the Myrus Sports
Complex in Macduff, including improvements to pitch provision to bring
it to Scottish Junior Football Association standard and to enhance wider
community use. Aberdeenshire Council recently carried out a review of
its Pitch Strategy,
The Live Life Aberdeenshire Pitch and Open Space Strategy, including
the capacity within Banff and Macduff and this identified that there was
sufficient capacity for the area, concluding that the area was well
provided for in terms of the volume of spaces which can be used for
sport but improvement action was needed to ensure that high levels of
demand at peak times could be met and this consultation will help
inform what actions could be taken and any improvements, mitigations
or projects coming from both the pitch review and this consultation may
144
ID
33
Respondent
Name
Leona Foote
Representation
Canal Park was gifted to the people of Banff and Macduff by the
Duke of Fife and was to be managed by the Council to the best
effect, and being that it states managed, you cannot do this if it
is sold. How disrespectful it is to throw away such a gift as this
and replace it with a supermarket which could go on other less
valuable land. Aberdeenshire Council have previously stated
Canal Park is the only suitable site for Morrisons, yet they
managed to identify a site in Macduff for Aldi. Canal park is in a
conservation area and enhances the approach to Banff
especially for tourism which plays a major part. The site is
regularly used by junior football teams and enjoyed by many
walkers between the 2 towns and is actually a right of way. If
Morrisons insist on building on Canal Park, it will have an
adverse effect on our area especially with the increase of heavy
traffic on our historic bridge which is unable to cope at present.
Two articulated lorries meeting have to mount the pavement and
this in itself endangers the lives of pedestrians. The area in
question is on a flood plain and along with Old Market Place was
subjected to severe flooding in 2019 and this can only get worse
if it is turned into a supermarket and car park. Aberdeenshire
Council have failed in their management of this gift by not
putting it to the best possible use as stated by the Duke of Fife
as there should have been income generated for the tennis
coursts and these have been neglected for approx 20 years. At
Response
of course form the basis of discussions regarding the beneficial spend
of any receipts received for the sale of the land. A planning application
will need to be separately submitted for consideration.
The pitch strategy has identified there is sufficient provision and option
of lease to sport trust is not best use of the site. The benefit of access
to green space and sport on health and wellbeing is recognised but
previous new facilities and the delivery of Aberdeenshire Pitch Strategy
will ensure plenty opportunity to continue to provide opportunities to
assist health and wellbeing via sport. The council undertook an Open
Space Strategy Audit, which was last updated in 2019 and noted that
Banff has a high proportion of accessible open space, at over 60%, so it
is not considered this proposal would impact upon access to that. Your
comments are noted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The purpose of the consultation is to obtain the views of the people of
Banff in respect of the potential disposal of this land . Any sale will be
subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a Common Good
Order.
The potential benefits and impacts in terms of the disposal will therefore
required to be weighted as part of the decision making process.
If the land is sold the funds received will form part of the Banff &
Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which is
administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit of
the people of Banff and Macduff. With regard to flooding the precedent
of a supermarket on this site has already been established with
previous planning and statutory consents being granted. SEPA will be
145
ID
463332
Respondent
Name
Mr Ian
Downie
Representation
Response
the previous consultations when Tesco wanted to build on the
site, Aberdeenshire Council stated replacement tennis courts
would be provided but all that happened was they upgraded the
existing school facilities which were in place when the new Banff
Academy was built. A supermarket on Canal Park or any
application to sell it, is actually dividing a community instead of
enhancing it. Supermarkets are 10 a penny but pride in our
history is forever.
a statutory consultee for the planning applications whose comments will
be fed into the design and the application. The council and Morrison’s
are aware of the need for any development to address flooding issues
but do not consider this to be prohibitive to development. It is noted
there has been discussions for other potential retailers, but they were all
offered the opportunity to offer on the site and Morrison were selected
via the competitive tendering process which the council is obliged to
comply with.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
If the sale proceeds, the common good fund will be in receipt of a
substantial sum. Tesco withdrew from the previous sale and number of
others across the UK due to commercial pressures they were under
rather than anything specific to this site. The council extracted a
significant capital contribution to allow Tesco to withdraw from previous
deal to sell the site and which was used to partly fund the new sports
and leisure facilities in Banff and Macduff.
If the development proceeds Aberdeenshire Council will be considering
further improvements and mitigation to existing sport facilities, e.g., it
could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements
to the remaining grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House.
This could include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and
maintenance, amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving
the co-ordination of access by users.
. The pitch strategy has identified there is sufficient provision and
option of lease to sport trust is not best use of the site. The commercial
operators are seeking ownership so lease not commercially viable for a
development such as this.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the
planning applications and, listed or conservation consent. The design,
146
I believe that this type of development is not appropriate for the
location. This is in an area of historic importance at the east
entrance to the town with many important old buildings and
recreational areas. A typical modern supermarket development
will detract from the area. With the risk of flooding always on the
ID
463347
Respondent
Name
Ian Clarke
Representation
Response
increase due to the expected rise in sea level and increased
annual rainfall, creating a large carpark and hardstanding
surface as well as a huge rooved building will add to the risk of
flooding in the area with severe effects on adjacent residential
private properties. As a result many residents in the area may be
in a situation where their properties become uninsurable and
unsaleable. This area should remain green and a public
recreational area. It may be that this area could be used for the
attenuation of rainwater to resolve the current flood risk. Once
sold to a private company, the authority will not have the ability
to do this and also the future replacement of the Banff Bridge
which is becoming a greater bottleneck for traffic every passing
year would be far easier to accommodate along with associated
approach roads if the area remained an open space in the
authorities control.
layout, nuisance and visual impact of the proposed store will be
considered as part of the planning application process and a proper
Transport Assessment will be undertaken to look at the capacity /
operation of the existing transport network and the interventions /
mitigations that are necessary to address any additional traffic
generated as a result of the development. Members of the public will of
course have the opportunity to comment on the planning application as
soon as the applicants proposals have been made clear. When it
comes to flooding any planning application will have to have regard to
relevant policies on flooding and SEPA will be a statutory consultee for
the planning applications whose comments will be fed into the design
and the application. The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need
for any development to address flooding issues but do not consider this
to be prohibitive to development.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
This land is held for the common good of the community; selling
it to a profit making organisation seff-evidently does not serve
the common good and would be tone deaf in terms of the need
for outdoor spaces for the community. This need has been
brought into sharp focus by the Covid epidemic and associated
increase in mental health issues, and recognition for the need
for all people to have easy access to green spaces. In addition
to this, the world faces a grave environmental crisis, the loss of
flora and fauna at an unprecedented rate and fast approaching
tipping points in terms of eco-system collapse both on land and
at sea, and plastic pollution that will endure for millennia now
present in the majority of human food chains, and 'providing
jobs' (and providing a short term gain for council) does not
outweigh the need to take decisive action to do everything
possible to avert impending disaster, this includes nurturing
plants, planting trees encouraging people to engage with the
outdoors and rejecting plastic waste and use. Viewed from the
perspective of a future generation 'our grandparents concreted
over a park and built a supermarket in the middle of the climate
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
147
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
crisis and obesity epidemic' will not cast the decision-makers in
a favourable light. Should that future generation be able to
suppress its disgust and investigate the matter further to
discover that the supermarket they built was ranked the worst for
treatment of staff, the ninth out of ten supermarkets for failing to
take positive environmental action (and even managed to
increase its use of plastic in the year prior to the decision) they
will be at a loss to understand how such a farce could have been
consented to by the people's elected representatives. Banff is a
beautiful and historic place which is turning a corner and
showing real innovation and growth in the heart of the town. The
argument that this development will bring jobs overlooks the
quality and rates of pay of those jobs. Both are low. With
investment and guidance the town can restore and utilise the
many existing buildings, promote growth and innovation and put
the soul back in the place, providing people with meaningful
work in sustainable business and buildings. There are
undoubtedly those who will point to the Duff House gardens as a
place to be outside. This is true but overlooks the part the canal
park plays on people's ability to move around the town, rest,
exercise and enjoy being outside without the need to cross a
busy road. For shoppers seeking to brighten up their shopping
trip, children and young people wanting to be outside with going
far from their houses and those living nearby of restricted
mobility the loss of this park will be a real blow, and the
community all the worse for it. Supermarkets are some of the
biggest culprits in terms of excess plastic use generation and
unsustainable practice, with Morrisons being amongst the
worse. The size of the shop appears similar to that of Co-op and
Tesco which effectively means that the benefit to the shopper
will be that they can buy the same products for similar prices in
different packaging - this is not an improvement for the town.
The optics of this proposal and the notion that the council might
support it are appalling second perhaps to Cumbia CC's support
of an Australian company opening a 'carbon neutral' coal mine in
the county. For the avoidance of doubt: laughable and shortsighted. For reference and supporting some of the points above:
The purpose of the consultation is to obtain the views of the people of
Banff in respect of the potential disposal of this land . Any sale will be
subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a Common Good
Order.
The potential benefits and impacts in terms of the disposal will therefore
required to be weighted as part of the decision making process.
If the land is sold the funds received will form part of the Banff &
Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which is
administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit of
the people of Banff and Macduff.
148
ID
Respondent
Name
463377
Catherine
Sievewright
463398
Tanya
463438
Peter Culley
Representation
https://www.plasticsoupfoundation.org/en/plasticproblem/plastic-affect-animals/plastic-food-chain/ - and https://www.breakroom.cc/blog/britains-best-supermarketsaccording-to-their-workers - and https://www.plasticsoupfoundation.org/en/plasticproblem/plastic-affect-animals/plastic-food-chain/
I am of the opinion that there is no requirement for another
supermarket on this site. Why was the site of the old chicken
factory at top of town not considered or somewhere in Macduff
which is at the moment a ghost town. Another point is that the
existing supermarkets have been the death knell of small
retailers in Banff. I feel that it is entirely wrong to sell off this land
as it has been utilised a lot over the years and belongs to the
population of Banff.
No issues and in favour of a much needed supermarket whether
it be Morrison’s or other.
A benefit for the town creating jobs and less need to travel
elsewhere which is also good for the environment. Also a benefit
for elderly and vulnerable people who are unable to travel
1. Potentially good for the town in terms of business and activity
but great potential to be of detriment to the townscape. 2.
Response
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities. Any sale will be
subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a Common Good
Order. The potential benefits and impacts in terms of the disposal will
therefore required to be weighted as part of the decision making
process. If the land is sold the funds received will form part of the Banff
& Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which
is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit
of the people of Banff and Macduff. When it comes to the use of the
land there was significant work undertaken on levels of use of the site
and the council are aware of the current and previous usage which was
used to develop the Aberdeenshire pitch strategy.
It is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted. The Canal
Park site has been allocated for commercial retail use in terms of the
Local Development Plan and the proposals fall within this classification.
A Retail Impact Assessment will also be undertaken as part of the
process which will assess the potential benefits and impacts that the
development will have on the town centre and existing retail within
Banff. Your comments are noted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact on the town has been noted and will be included in
the report to Area Committee.
Thank you for the positive comments they are noted. The precedent of
a supermarket on this site has already been established with previous
149
ID
Respondent
Name
16
Donna
Buyers
17
Helen Clark
Representation
Response
Potential benefits due to available monies for town
improvements, and possibility to improve streetscape if stringent
planning limitations imposed. 3. Concerns due to streetscape,
light pollution for the town, bad street signage. Concerns around
demolition of historic buildings and old town wall.
Good afternoon, I wish to add my views to the Banff Canal Park
consultation please. I live in Gardenstown and have to travel to
Banff for my weekly food shopping and other necessities. I
strongly support the need for more retail space being made
available for Morrisons supermarket (or any other) which may
wish to set up a new premises in the Canal Park area.At present
we only have 2 main supermarkets to access in Banff, and I am
sure that there are others like me who have to travel some
distance in order to buy the things we need daily. (16 mile round
trip for me.) So these 2 existing supermarkets have a very wide
catchment area to serve, and not by choice but by necessity.
More competition would be helpful in terms of competitive
pricing, availability of certain goods (which are otherwise limited
or unavailable), parking space availability, and reducing the
numbers of people using each existing supermarket - especially
so during the Corona virus we have all been living through.
I wish to object to the proposal to sell Canal Park in Banff the
reasons being. The Canal Park was gifted to the residents of
Banff & Macduff the late Duke of Fife, can the Council really sell
such a gift that belongs to both towns. The entrance to Banff
from the bridges is so beautiful with its only green area left in
Banff and to sell it for yet another supermarket is unbelievable,
especially when there is four in Banff already. Why was Macduff
not chosen for Morrisons when they have no supermarkets at
all? We hve waited many years for a new bridge at Banff, can
the existing structure of the bridge cope with the huge extra
amount of lorries that would be crossing to deliver good to
Morrisons, let alone crossing the new road to get there.
Morrisons estimate 150 - 175 jobs for the stores' operation , as
seen in the past the number of jobs supposed to be available
are never any where near the amount that was estimated. On
counting the shops that have already closed in Banff and with
planning and statutory consents being granted. Any planning
application will have to have regard to relevant policies as regards
lighting, signage and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for
the planning applications and, listed or conservation consent.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation.
Any sale will be subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a
Common Good Order. The potential benefits and impacts in terms of
the disposal will therefore required to be weighted as part of the
decision making process. If the land is sold the funds received will form
150
ID
18
Respondent
Name
Anne
Morrison
Representation
Response
three shop keeers intending to retire this year the total is 19. To
prevent Banff becoming another ghost town we cannot take
another supermarket. If the sale of the Canal Park goes ahead I
hope that those who voted yes will hang their heads in shame
when the beautiful entrance to Banff has been lost for ever.
Please let it be a NO SALE for the Canal Park.
part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds held by
Aberdeenshire Council which is administered by the Banff & Buchan
Area Committee for the benefit of the people of Banff and Macduff. As
part of the process a planning application will need to be separately
submitted for consideration.
The design, layout, nuisance and visual impact of the proposed store
will be considered as part of that process. Alongside this a proper
Transport Assessment will also require to be undertaken to look at the
capacity / operation of the existing transport network and the
interventions / mitigations which are necessary to address any
additional traffic generated due to the development noted.
A Retail Impact Assessment will also be undertaken as part of the
process which will assess the potential benefits and impacts that the
development will have on the town centre and existing retail within
Banff. Your comments are noted.
We note that you are in support of a new supermarket for the area but
not at the proposed location. It is noted there has been publicity around
discussions for other potential sites but to date none have been
brought forward. The precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted. The Canal Park site has been allocated for commercial
retail use in terms of the Local Development Plan and the proposals fall
within this classification.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
The potential benefits and impacts in terms of the disposal will
therefore required to be weighted as part of the decision making
151
I am writing to lend my support to those who are trying to fight
against the erection of a supermarket on Canal Park, Banff.
This would be a travesty as, firstly, this land was gifted in
perpetuity to the town for use by the residents and, secondly, it
is a great asset to young kids wanting to play football, which
they do regularly, all year round. I’m quite sure an alternative
site could be found. Most people visit supermarkets by car so it
could be anywhere - where the chicken factory was, for
example. The grassy, open space at the entrance to the town
is much more attractive than yet another concrete and glass
functional supermarket. I am aware that a new supermarket is
required and would provide much needed jobs but PLEASE
don’t take away another public green space when it could be
sited elsewhere in the town.
ID
19
Respondent
Name
Alex
Chalmers
Representation
Firstly my congrtulations to person/persons who prepared this
excellent document. The two matters I think need considering
are - the old Banff bridge, if this project gets the go ahead the
old bridge replacment becomes urgent. The other matter is the
drainage in that part of town. Is it in a fit state to cope with extra
footfall? If these matters can be addressed satisfactorally I
would be in favour of Morrison getting permission to proceed.
SECOND set of comments 27/06/2021 - I have read the
Consultation Document several times. My main concern was the
taking away of the playing rights of the junior teams, however I
believe they now have training facilities at the new sports centre
at Banff Academy. When Duke of Fife & his wife vacated Duff
House to go to Mar Lodge they gifted Duff House & some
adjacent land to the Burghs of Banff & Macduff for the purpose
of recreation & sport. Duff House Royal Golf Club still fulfills part
of that request. Considering how things have changed lately, I
think that now may be time for change. If Morrison’s get the go
Response
process. If the land is sold the funds received will form part pf the Banff
& Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which
is administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit
of the people of Banff and Macduff.
Aberdeenshire Council recently carried out a review of its Pitch
Strategy, The Live Life Aberdeenshire Pitch and Open Space Strategy,
including the capacity within Banff and Macduff and this identified that
there was sufficient capacity for the area, concluding that the area was
well provided for in terms of the volume of spaces which can be used
for sport but improvement action was needed to ensure that high levels
of demand at peak times could be met and this consultation will help
inform what actions could be taken and any improvements, mitigations
or projects coming from both the pitch review and this consultation may
of course form the basis of discussions regarding the beneficial spend
of any receipts received for the sale of the land. A planning application
will need to be separately submitted for consideration.
The design, layout, nuisance and visual impact of the proposed store
will be considered as part of that process and members of the public will
also be given the opportunity to examine and provide comment on the
proposals contained within the application. Your comments are noted.
Thank you for the positive comments.
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted.
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies
and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and, listed or conservation consent.
The store is likely to generate additional footfall in the lower Banff area,
which is an opportunity for businesses in the vicinity to build upon. This
will be dependent on customer choice, feeling of value and ease of
access and may also improve customer choice and cost of goods.
In regards to the playing area, the loss of the pitch has already been
152
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
ahead we would have the makings of a retail park, with Coop,
Tesco & Morrisons it would give the public in the surrounding
area more choices & create some competition. With the addition
of Morrison’s to the area it would make the replacement of the
old Banff Bridge an urgency to accommodate the extra traffic
which this would hopefully attract to the town. The
Aberdeenshire planning department should have on file a plan
from 20 years ago for the new bridge.I hope you find my
comments useful. THIRD set of comments - "... Thank you for
your response to my ideas on Canal Park .The dynamics have
now changed with the Junior football saying thy still need the
pitch ,as the ones at Banff Academy are used for their sports.
Also Aldi have applied for permission to build a store in a vacant
field at Macduff.My feelings now , if Aldi gets permission ,would
be leave the Canal Park for Junior football ,in keeping with
Dukes ideas for his gifted land to be used for sporting activities
for Banff and Macduff.Hope you find my comments helpful.
mostly dealt with, as Aberdeenshire Council has made significant
investment in improving community and sporting provision locally to the
value of £12.5 million pounds in recent years.
This investment, after engagement with the community, took the form of
new sporting facilities comprising the Deveron Sports Complex in Banff
and the Myrus Sports Complex in Macduff, including improvements to
pitch provision to bring it to Scottish Junior Football Association
standard and to enhance wider community use. Aberdeenshire Council
will be considering further improvements and mitigation to existing sport
facilities, e.g., it could be possible to enhance existing grass pitch
provision elsewhere by undertaking improvements to the remaining
grass pitches at Banff Academy, Myrus & Duff House. This could
include enhancing the drainage, floodlighting and maintenance,
amongst other things, and mitigation such as improving the coordination of access by users. Any other potential large-scale sports or
community projects may be subject to a separate public consultation to
decide the best use of Common Good money.
To date not planning application has been received from any
supermarket for land in Banff or Macduff.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
20
Robert Wood
We say yes to Morrisons at Banff.
21
Troy
Houghton
22
Lorna
MacLeod
I am one of the few healthcare professionals living and working
from Banff (Macduff Medical Practice). I fully support the
development of a Morrisons or similar at Canal Park in Banff.
Not only would this bring much needed business development to
the area, invigorating the local economy and attractiveness of
the area, but could also have substantial effect on the access to
healthy and varied food stuff for the local community. At the
moment most people are shopping either from the very poor
local selection, or having to drive a fair distance (If they have
transport) and thus having a larger impact on the environment
and their own health. An easy source of good quality food
should be much supported, as should the creation of jobs. I for
one say yes to the idea of the Park Canal being sold and used
for a supermarket development.
To whom it may concern: Yes for Morrisons. Too many
reasons to mention.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
153
ID
23
24
Respondent
Name
Margaret
Lawrence
Representation
Response
The greater area of land in question was gifted by The Duke of
Fife and in my opinion should be left as was intended for the
common good/use by the local community. That open green
space which is well used, should be an amenity accessible by all
and not built on, as this will have a negative visual impact as
well as impacting on our local shops. If someone goes to
Morrisons to shop, they will buy beef and bakery goods etc,
there and not support our local butcher and baker in the high
street. Overall it's going to be detrimental I feel in trying to retain
our local community and support our local business owners. On
coming over Banff Bridge at present, is a lovely green open
expanse which is encouraging and complimentary to the
surrounding area. Any benefits of a major superstore
(competitive prices) are outweighed by the negatives. We need
to invest in our local shops in order to maintain a thriving local
economy and support and build on what we already have while
continuing to enjoy an open green "community space" on
common good ground.
Ann Roy
I wish to support the sale of the above land to be used for a
Super market on the site.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by
s 222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is
considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area.
All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in compliance
with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation The purpose of the
consultation is to obtain the views of the people of Banff in respect of
the potential disposal of this land.
Any sale will be subject to the outcome of the consultation, securing a
Common Good Order. The potential benefits and impacts in terms of
the disposal will therefore required to be weighted as part of the
decision making process. If the land is sold the funds received will form
part pf the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds held by
Aberdeenshire Council which is administered by the Banff & Buchan
Area Committee for the benefit of the people of Banff and Macduff.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that.
Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant policies
and Historic Scotland will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications and, listed or conservation consent. The design, layout,
nuisance and visual impact of the proposed store will be considered as
part of that process. A Retail Impact Assessment will also be
undertaken as part of the process which will assess the potential
benefits and impacts that the development will have on the town centre
and existing retail within Banff. Your comments are noted.
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
has been noted and will be included in the report to Area Committee.
154
ID
25
26
Respondent
Name
Mr & Mrs
Galloway
Lesley
Sapherson
Representation
Response
Both my wife and I are very keen for the Morrison’s
development to go ahead. Banff and Macduff are very much in
need of a decent sized supermarket to be located in Banff,
especially as Tesco are to close their Banff store at the end of
this year. This would mean that Banff would have only one
medium sized supermarket, I.e. the Co-operative in Bridge
Road. The other groceries are smaller “convenience” shops At
present, a large number of residents travel to Fraserburgh,
Huntly or Elgin to do their weekly shopping. We must consider
those who are unable to travel to other towns for shopping,
especially pensioners who may have no car. Public transport to
Fraserburgh and Huntly is rather irregular and expensive. The
Elgin buses involve a 70 mile round journey! We do not agree
that the Canal Park is in regular use and there are few children
residing nearby who would use that facility, and most footballers
do not like the park as they say that the surface is too hard!
There are suitable alternatives in both Banff and Macduff At the
moment Banff can be considered as merely a residential town
suitable for retired people who have selected Banff as a quiet
town which is not a hive of activity! This development would
generate badly needed jobs both in the construction and staffing
the store. Banff badly needs such a supermarket such as
Morrison’s, not only for the residents but to attract people from
the surrounding district, such as Gardenstown, Aberchirder,
Whitehills, Cornhill and Portsoy who at the present have to
travel afar to do their weekly Shopping. Please support this
development.
With regard to the proposal to build a supermarket, cafe, filling
station, car wash and parking area. All of this to be established
on common good land. My first thoughts are : why do we need
any of these facilities when we already have them in Banff? The
original consultation and approval was granted ten years ago
and people's priorities with regard to the area have changed
greatly since then In light of climate change and covid none of
these items proposed seem like a good or valid idea. There
would also be concerns regarding the flood plane, traffic on an
already narrow and congested area particularly over Banff
Positive response to the sale of land to Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
and positive impact on the surrounding area has been noted and will be
included in the report to Area Committee.
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities.
The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted. Any planning application will have to have regard to relevant
policies, impact on the environment and flooding. SEPA will be a
statutory consultee for the planning applications whose comments will
be fed into the design and the application. The council and Morrison’s
155
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
bridge and disruption to the area. Added to this what will be the
effect on already struggling businesses in Banff? Surely the
common good land could be put to better use with much less
environmental impact on humans and wildlife alike. Please think
again with regard to this matter. Banff is a historic town and
deserves better than this!
are aware of the need for any development to address flooding issues
but do not consider this to be prohibitive to development. The
provision of supermarket for residents as opposed to travelling to Huntly
or Elgin could also help reduce carbon footprint. A Transport
Assessment will also require to be undertaken to look at the capacity /
operation of the existing transport network and the interventions /
mitigations which are necessary to address any additional traffic
generated due to the development. A Retail Impact Assessment will
also be undertaken as part of this process to assess the potential
benefits and impacts which the proposals will have on the town centre
and the existing retailers within Banff.
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would have an Environmental impact on local inhabitants or
wildlife.
Any sale of this land will be subject to the outcome of the consultation,
securing a Common Good Order, and obtaining planning consent
The purpose of the consultation is to ascertain the views of the people
of Banff and the surrounding area regarding the proposed sale of this
common good land to Wm Morrisons plc this includes whether or not
there is a need within the community for such facilities. Your comments
have been noted.
Petition
The council is obliged to contact community bodies which it is aware of
when given notice of the consultation . this is defined as ”, in relation to
a local authority, means bodies, whether or not formally constituted,
established for purposes which consist of or include that of promoting or
improving the interests of any communities (however described)
resident or otherwise present in the area of the local authority,
The save our canal park group did not exist prior to consultation so
could not have been a community body or be such a community body
and all members of the group and petition could have made a formal
response va the consultation which was well publicised.
27
June Clark
There is no need for another supermarket as population of Banff
and Macduff together amounts to about 7 thousand people.
28
Rachel
Kennedy
I would like to let you know of my intention to submit a formal
objection to the sale of Canal Park in Banff to Morrisons's by
Aberdeenshire Council, before the deadline ends this
Wednesday 30 June 2021. As a Macduff resident (16 years)
and Banff business owner (retail shop on Bridge Street, 4 years)
my objection is that as Common Good land, the site at Canal
Park should not be sold for commercial development. Together
with the support of fellow residents, I am the administrator of a
Facebook group called "Save Our Canal Park" (currently 972
members) and I have also started a public campaign online with
the same aim, to stop the sale, through Change dot org. My
understanding is that, in this capacity, I may present a case for
members of the community who will be adversely affected by the
loss of this valuable amenity and for whom, the permanent loss
156
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
of this site will have a drastic and negative impact on the two
towns. I would also like to mention that I am aware of problems
due to the Consultation being difficult to access for residents
who are not online and that there have been delays in issuing
paper versions of the Consultation (a month to arrive in both
cases), which I am sure you would agree is not acceptable. I
have also been told of the general lack of awareness of the
Consultation itself by older residents in both towns, which has
created a very negative impression with those individuals, some
of whom have lived here all their lives. I thought you would wish
to know this.
The council has noted the Facebook page to “save canal park “ and
receipt of a petition with 754 signatures in objection to the proposal. The
press and journal newspaper also ran an informal poll which results
showed that 311 people wanted a new Morrisons at Canal Park, while
239 voted to save the green space.
None of these however constitute a competent statutory representation
to the consultation as, in terms of the statutory guidance, it requires the
ability to publish the details of the individual, their representations and
the council’s response to them to form a valid statutory representation
as noted in the Consultation this will still be noted for informative
purposes only in the committee report .
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation. The purpose of the consultation is to obtain
the views of the people of Banff in respect of the potential disposal of
this land . Any sale will be subject to the outcome of the consultation,
securing a Common Good Order. The potential benefits and impacts in
terms of the disposal will therefore required to be weighted as part of
the decision making process. If the land is sold the funds received will
form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds held by
Aberdeenshire Council which is administered by the Banff & Buchan
Area Committee for the benefit of the people of Banff and Macduff.
Closure of council offices and libraries for some of the consultation
period is accepted but this was mitigated by the extension to the
consultation period. There was a press release and notice advertising
the consultation and articles ran by local press on the proposal.
Community Councils and community bodies were all given direct
notification as required by statute and all were asked to bring it to the
157
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
30
Morag
Sivewright
Thank you very much for your email, I welcome the chance to
put forward my views. Firstly, while I strongly agree that the
Banff & Macduff area would benefit hugely from a new
supermarket I think the Canal park is entirely the wrong site for
one. It is used in an almost daily capacity for many sports
activities, I know there are other sports venues available but in
this post Covid situation with more sports activities being made
available for children & young adults is it beneficial to get rid of a
perfectly serviceable one? Secondly, another supermarket built
there would surely negatively impact on both Tesco and the Coop, both of which employ many people from the two towns and
surrounding area. It would also presumably affect the trade for
The Spotty Bag shop as would in all, probability, sell many of the
same products. The Spotty Bag Shop has been very
successfully built up over a period of time and is a huge asset to
Banff. Thirdly, in my opinion there are better sites for a new
supermarket, the old site of the chicken factory in Banff is an
eyesore and badly needing renovation and in Macduff there are
sites opposite the Recycling Centre. I appreciate the chance to
put forward my points. My daughter would also appreciate the
chance to respond vie this email address later today. Thank you,
31
Laurieann
Sivewright
I just wanted to email my views on canal Park being sold as a
supermarket site. I do not agree with a supermarket going into
this location. In fact I find it down right ridiculous. Canal Park
was gifted to the community so to be selling it that in itself is a
cheek. Canal Park is still used for sports and is a beautiful
area... Who wants to see another ugly building? I have also
heard that Morrisons as a company is in trouble so chances are
Response
attention of all people, they thought should be aware. Representations
have been received in letter as well as email format and the number
received would indicate that the community is fully aware of the
consultation.
The Council has complied with the requirements of the Community
Empowerment Act as far as it was possible to do so due to Covid
restrictions and taken steps to ensure these restrictions did not
prejudice the conduct of the consultation.
We note that you are in support of a new supermarket for the area but
not at the proposed location. It is noted there has been publicity around
discussions for other potential sites but to date none have been
brought forward. The precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted. Aberdeenshire Council recently carried out a review of
its Pitch Strategy, The Live Life Aberdeenshire Pitch and Open Space
Strategy, including the capacity within Banff and Macduff and this
identified that there was sufficient capacity for the area, concluding that
the area was well provided for in terms of the volume of spaces which
can be used for sport but improvement action was needed to ensure
that high levels of demand at peak times could be met and this
consultation will help inform what actions could be taken and any
improvements, mitigations or projects coming from both the pitch review
and this consultation may of course form the basis of discussions
regarding the beneficial spend of any receipts received for the sale of
the land.
A Retail Impact Assessment will be undertaken as part of the planning
process which will assess the potential benefits and impacts that the
development will have on the town centre and existing retail within
Banff.
Alternative site are noted but none have been brought forward thus far,
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by
s 222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
158
ID
32
Respondent
Name
Michael
Foote
Representation
Response
it could end up completely empty... Another empty building in the
area. I work at the co-op at the bridge and I don't think we'd
survive a bigger supermarket going in so we'd lose our jobs. I've
a family to think of. There are so many other locations in the
town better suited for something like this. New builds at the
springs would benefit from a shop closer to them and it wouldn't
affect the shops down the bottom of the town the same. Thanks
for reading.
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation The purpose of the consultation is to obtain
the views of the people of Banff in respect of the potential disposal of
this land . Any sale will be subject to the outcome of the consultation,
securing a Common Good Order. The potential benefits and impacts in
terms of the disposal will therefore required to be weighted as part of
the decision making process. If the land is sold the funds received will
form part pf the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds held by
Aberdeenshire Council which is administered by the Banff & Buchan
Area Committee for the benefit of the people of Banff and Macduff. The
design, layout and visual impact of the proposed store will be
considered as part of the planning application process under which
members of the public will have the opportunity to provide their views
once the proposals have been made clear. A Retail Impact Assessment
will also be undertaken as part of the process which will assess the
potential benefits and impacts that the development will have on the
town centre and existing retail within Banff. When it comes to other sites
it is noted there has been publicity around discussions for other
potential sites but to date none have been brought forward. The
precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been established
with previous planning and statutory consents being granted. our
comments are noted in respect of the availability of other sites.. Wm
Morrison plc's financial position at the moment is healthy and they have
reaffirmed their commitment to proceed with the sale Your comments
have been noted.
Common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area. As part of the
Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must consider use of
assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It is understood
this can often be difficult to reconcile but sale is considered to be best
159
The land was given to the people of Banff and Macduff. What
was given to the then Town Councils was the responsibility of
managing it for the poepole and not to sell it off. The Land in
question is often flooded as it is below sea level and therefore
unsuitable for building. It is also in a designated (by Council)
conservation area and commercial development would ruin a
beautiful green area. There is land allocated in more suitable
places for commerce and retail and Canal Park need not be
sacrified. The adjacent golf club; Princess Royal, and The
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
Vinery have all been leased or bought by organisations which
use them. Why can't the other half of Canal Park be leased by
the Clubs and Fun Day organisers, etc, who use the park much
more than the others? I am wholly against the sale of the land.
use of this asset for the inhabitants of the area. All decisions in respect
of the common good are taken in compliance with the relevant statutes
and Scheme of Delegation. The purpose of the consultation is to obtain
the views of the people of Banff in respect of the potential disposal of
this land . Any sale will be subject to the outcome of the consultation,
securing a Common Good Order. The potential benefits and impacts in
terms of the disposal will therefore required to be weighted as part of
the decision making process. If the land is sold the funds received will
form part of the Banff & Macduff Common Good funds held by
Aberdeenshire Council which is administered by the Banff & Buchan
Area Committee for the benefit of the people of Banff and Macduff.
With regard to flooding the precedent of a supermarket on this site has
already been established with previous planning and statutory consents
being granted. SEPA will be a statutory consultee for the planning
applications whose comments will be fed into the design and the
application.
The council and Morrison’s are aware of the need for any development
to address flooding issues but do not consider this to be prohibitive to
development. It is noted there has been discussions for other potential
retailers, but they were all offered the opportunity to offer on the site
and Morrison were selected via the competitive tendering process
which the council is obliged to comply with.
The Canal Park site has been allocated for commercial retail use in
terms of the Local Development Plan and the proposals fall within this
classification. The pitch strategy has identified there is sufficient
provision and option of lease to sport trust is not best use of the site.
The commercial operators are seeking ownership so lease not
commercially viable for a development such as this.
160
ID
463439
Respondent
Name
Vivien Rae
463648
R Milligan
Representation
Response
1. I vehemently disagree with the proposed 'disposal' of Canal
Park to make way for a supermarket. Canal Park provides good
attractive green space which is currently in use by local
community groups / clubs. Its location near to the River
Deveron, neighbouring football stadium and golf club provide an
attractive entrance to the town, which would be significantly
blighted by the building of a supermarket and carpark. 2. I am
not against a supermarket being introduced to Banff or Macduff,
but NOT on Canal Park, there are other locations across both
towns that are far better suited and which will not sacrifice prime
community green space. 3. a) Traffic / Safety - The bridge over
the River Deveron has long been a concern with regard to heavy
use and regular flow of traffic and the consequential stress
placed on the infrastructure. I regularly travel across the bridge
by car and frequently witness traffic flow stopped to
accommodate large vehicles crossing the bridge, not to mention
concern for pedestrian safety on the pavements nearby. I fail to
understand why a supermarket is being proposed at this location
which will add further heavy use to an already congested road
and junction.
b) Proposed Store Offering - "The size of the sales area in the
store is smaller than mainstream competitors.." - feels very
much like another small scale supermarket which will sell limited
ranges at premium prices. I am also concerned that such a wide
range of our existing local businesses face direct competition ie
fuel sales, cafes, which may have adverse effect on employment
and our high street. c) Tourism / Impression When Entering The
Town - Canal Park currently provides an attractive entrance to
the town, as well as making up part of the stunning view from
the Temple of Venus / Hill of Doune, both of which would be
significantly blighted by the building of a supermarket and
carpark in that area. With efforts underway at the nearby Vinery
to bring it back into community use, it is adverse to sell adjacent
green space for extensive retail development.
I object strongly to the proposed disposal by sale of the
Common Good Land in the area known as Canal Park. Potential
financial benefits are one-off and would not be as beneficial as a
We note that you are in support of a new supermarket for the area but
not at the proposed location. It is noted there has been publicity around
discussions for other potential sites but to date none have been brought
forward. The precedent of a supermarket on this site has already been
established with previous planning and statutory consents being
granted.
A planning application will need to be separately submitted for
consideration. The design, layout, nuisance and visual impact of the
proposed store will be considered as part of that process and members
of the public will also be given the opportunity to examine and provide
comment on the proposals contained within the application. The
council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon the access to that. As part of the planning
process a proper Transport Assessment will also require to be
undertaken to look at the capacity / operation of the existing transport
network and the interventions / mitigations which are necessary to
address any additional traffic generated due to the development.
A Retail Impact Assessment will also be undertaken as part of this
process to assess the potential benefits and impacts which the
proposals will have on the town centre and the existing retailers within
Banff. If the land is sold the funds received will form part pf the Banff &
Macduff Common Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which is
administered by the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit of
the people of Banff and Macduff. There is no evidence that a
supermarket would impact on tourist activity as the site was not used for
visitors to the area. Access to a supermarket as opposed to having to
go to Huntly or Elgin could also assist in keeping visitors in town.
The vinery is also a common good asset and consultation was
undertaking for its disposal to a charity to run for community uses and
none of these are anticipated to be in conflict with Morrison
development.
When it comes to leasing the commercial supermarket operators are
seeking ownership for such a development so lease not commercially
viable for development such as this. A Retail Impact Assessment will
161
ID
29
Respondent
Name
Friends of
Duff House
Representation
Response
lease arrangement for ongoing income. No new net jobs will be
created due to the likely closure of the adjacent co-op and job
losses in other local businesses targeted by the proposed
development. This a proven fact in past research by the Local
Retail Forum. This is a relatively large area of open and green
land adjacent to an existing eyesore of floodlighting and fences.
There appears to be no pressing need for revenue considering
the expenditure on Council property refurbishments over recent
years.
also be undertaken as part of the process which will independently
assess the potential benefits and impacts that the development will
have on the town centre and existing retail within Banff. A planning
application will need to be separately submitted for consideration. The
design, layout, nuisance and visual impact of the proposed store will be
considered as part of that process. Members of the public will of course
be given the opportunity to put forward their views in respect of the
application as part of the planning process. There is no suggestion of
using Common Good funds to fund the Council’s other statutory
responsibilities. The Council has a statutory obligation to provide
certain services and allocation of budgets is considered considering
area needs. Use of Common Good funds for local projects or to assist
in community funding is a competent use of such funds. If the land is
sold the funds received will form part pf the Banff & Macduff Common
Good funds held by Aberdeenshire Council which is administered by
the Banff & Buchan Area Committee for the benefit of the people of
Banff and Macduff.
The council carried out a consultation with community prior to
submitting previous applications for common good and any new
applications would have to have regard to this consultation.
This response is as a result of a consultation with all 110 of our
members. All views expressed are contained within the following
pages of this response, whether positive or negative.
Based on the information released by Aberdeenshire Council to
date the majority view of the Friends of Duff House, having
carefully considered all positive and negative aspects of the
proposal as given on the following pages in this response, is that
Canal Park should NOT be sold the Wm Morrison
Supermarkets.
Most members have been at pains to express that this is not a
reflection on Morrisons as an
individual supermarket, to a large extent quite the opposite; the
members have advised they
would give the same response whichever supermarket was
being proposed at this location.
Footfall
The silver smith workshop has a significantly less attraction in number
of users compared to a supermarket so not a valid comparison in terms
of footfall
Access
The planning application and traffic impact assessment will look in
further detail on accessibility issues.
Competition between stores is not within control of the council but a
site will come forward in the area at some point for a supermarket and
if not council site it will have same impact but with no receipt to be
invested back into the community.
We look forward to being advised of Aberdeenshire Council’s
decision as to the way forward (we have registered with our
162
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
email address as suggested on your website consultation page
to
“Stay Informed”).
The council does note the impact can be both positive and negative on
existing shops .
Depending on Aberdeenshire Council’s view of the consultation
responses received and their decision on the way forward,
Friends of Duff House urge Aberdeenshire
Council to have a direct consultation in advance of any
application to the Court for a Common
Good Order. During the process of the last two Applications the
arguments for and against have
been carried out within the Court and we feel it would be more
public serving, constructive and
could help to formulate a better application if any is to be made,
if such discussions take place in advance of a Common Good
Order Application being submitted.
The issues considered by our members in reaching the
conclusion that Canal Park should NOT be sold are given in the
following table. The order these issues appear in the table is not
intended to suggest any relative importance!
Bring additional trade to local shops
With a large store attracting lots of people at one end of Bridge
St, with appropriate signage and a welcoming newly revamped
Bridge St, some people may visit Low St, and onwards to High
St, as part of their visit to Morrisons.
A similar claim of additional members of the public was made
at the time of the Silversmith workshop; but this has not been
busy enough to generate additional footfall into town, and
there has been no evidence of additional shoppers, even to the
existing shops on Bridge St.
Although Bridge St surface and street furniture are being
updated, many of the buildings have not been refreshed, and
some large structures do not give the impression of a vibrant
and bustling town that is worth visiting.
It is not clear where the pedestrian accesses to the
A Transport Assessment will also require to be undertaken to look at
the capacity / operation of the existing transport network and the
interventions / mitigations which are necessary to address any
additional traffic generated due to the development.
The previous consents granted to Tesco were not objected to and
consent granted with no transport issues which could not be mitigated. .
Flood
The council and Morrison’s are aware of need for mitigation to address
flooding and drainage and will be in position to mitigate this . Sepa will
also be a consultee on any planning application.
Sports capacity
The Live Life Aberdeenshire Pitch and Open Space Strategy, including
the capacity within Banff and Macduff and this identified that there was
sufficient capacity for the area, concluding that the area was well
provided for in terms of the volume of spaces which can be used for
sport but improvement action was needed to ensure that high levels of
demand at peak times could be met and this consultation will help
inform what actions could be taken and any improvements, mitigations
or projects coming from both the pitch review and this consultation may
of course form the basis of discussions regarding the beneficial spend
of any receipts received for the sale of the land.
common Good land is owned by Aberdeenshire Council but
administered separately from other local authority property. Vested by s
222 Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 and then by s15 Local
Government etc. (Scotland) Act 1994. Both transfer provisions confirm
that in administering common good property the authority must have
regard to the interests of the inhabitants of the area.
As part of the Council’s responsibility to Common Good, it must
consider use of assets in addition to maintaining the historical aspect. It
163
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
supermarket will be and how obvious these will be, or how
well they will be signposted, towards Low St.
Many shoppers are reluctant to climb Strait Path or other route
to High St, so the additional number of visitors there would be
even less than Low St.
At present, the Spotty Bag shop can be extremely busy. This
is in a relatively similar position to the proposed Morrisons as
regards access to Low St. Yet Low St retailers advise that the
Spotty Bag customers do not wander into their shops.
Adding a third supermarket in this area of town starts to create
a shopping mall type effect, ie Tesco, Morrisons, Spotty Bag
and Coop, resulting in even less reason for visitors to this
estate to visit small local shops.
Based on the above, the FAQ in the consultation document
that the supermarket “is likely” to generate additional footfall,
is not seen as credible.
Keeping local grocery pricing competitive
With Tesco, Co-op and Morrisons in town, prices for similar
goods will be pegged due to competition.
Large supermarket prices are generally set nationally or
regionally with little or any scope for price changes by local
managers, and hence competitive pricing exists for Banff
anyway.
is understood this can often be difficult to reconcile but the proposed
sale is considered to be best use of this asset for the inhabitants of the
area. All decisions in respect of the common good are taken in
compliance with the relevant statutes and Scheme of Delegation.
In the medium term it is not believed there will be sufficient
demand to support three supermarkets in the Banff and
Macduff area, and the chances of Tesco and/or Coop closing
are viewed as quite high. So after the medium term (two-ish
years?) the local residents of Banff and Macduff won’t have
any greater choice than they have now. Potentially, if both
Tesco and Coop were to close, local residents could be worse
off than at the present time.
More jobs to the Town
The Consultation FAQ’s suggest 150 to 175 jobs will be
created.
As with the issue above, it is not envisaged that Morrisons
would remain an additional store offering, but due to
The consultation process and court order is what allows the council to
depart from the restrictions of the common good .titles to deliver a
better outcome
A Transport Assessment will be necessary as part of any future
planning application. This will involve an assessment of the
capacity/operation of the existing transport network and will identify any
areas where intervention/mitigation is necessary in order to address any
additional traffic generated as a result of the development
The council undertook an Open Space Strategy Audit, which was last
updated in 2019 and noted that Banff has a high proportion of
accessible open space, at over 60%, so it is not considered this
proposal would impact upon this.
The consultations documents sets out that cost of providing any
alternative pitch would exceed the capital receipt but its not required
due to there being sufficient capacity. The council undertook an Open
Space Strategy Audit, which was last updated in 2019 and noted that
Banff has a high proportion of accessible open space, at over 60%, so it
is not considered this proposal would impact upon this.
164
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
competition it could easily be the only supermarket in Banff
and Macduff. Hence any job creation in the short term would
not carry forward into the long term.
More choice of Foods
Morrisons provides a one-stop shop for more people, perhaps
especially for those that have mobility restrictions and visiting
other shops in Banff and Macduff and further afield is
difficult. Hence a reduction in travelling benefitting the
individuals and the environment too.
By being a one-stop shop this counters any positive argument
of local competition between supermarket pricing.
Local Development Plan
The Consultation FAQs advise “in a purely commercial
sense” it delivers the LDP.
This statement is disputed as the LDP vision states “it is
important that all future development promotes regeneration
in the area, including improved transport infrastructure to and
from the settlement, building flood resilience, while protecting
the historic character of the town to ensure the town remains a
popular destination for visitors and tourists.” Each of these
points have strongly negative aspects as given below.
Transport Infrastructure
A new supermarket will result in more lorries coming with
deliveries, and the whole aim seems to be to get more people
to come to the supermarket. Hence there will be additional
traffic, which will make the existing bottlenecks even more an
issue:
- Banff Town Centre;
- Banff side of Banff Bridge, with more people trying to
turn right towards Morrisons (whether the entrance is
from Bridge Road or even New Road);
- Macduff side of Banff Bridge.
With limited land area there does not appear to be any easy
solution as to how to reconfigure traffic flow across Banff
Bridge, eg roundabouts etc. So without major road
infrastructure changes (requiring more investment than the
sale price of the common good land appears likely to be) the
165
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
following risks will be multiplied:
- pedestrians and cyclists crossing Banff Bridge due to
not only increased car numbers, but increased lorry
numbers of a size that already regularly have to put
wheels on the pavement;
- queueing on Banff Bridge and tailing towards Banff
and/or Macduff as more people are trying to turn right
into Bridge Road or to join the A947 towards
Myrus/Aberdeen.
Hence further delays, less safety and more pollution from
idling cars and lorries.
Flood resilience
Much of the land is in the flood risk area, where
Aberdeenshire Council do not allow living spaces.
The additional tarmacked and roofed area of a new
supermarket will create run-off issues, in an area where
sustainable underwater drainage systems are not very effective
due to the lack of height above river/sea level.
The proposal includes the provision of a petrol garage. For
safety these have underground storage tanks. While a risk
assessment is always required for these, use in a flood risk
area give rise to additional safety and pollution hazards, with
the consequences of hydrocarbons escaping into the flood
water, where other properties are within the same area, could
be devastating.
Historic character of the town
Removal of the old Bridge Street Community Centre,
reducing the look of dereliction in the lower part of Bridge St.
This area is within the Banff Conservation Area, and while it
can be argued that Coop, Tesco, Spotty Bag and one or two
other buildings are not historic, Morrisons would create
presumably the largest structure in the area and completely tip
the balance towards modern. It is recognised that the structure
would require Planning Permission that would look at the
visual impact aspect in detail, but the impact to visitors would
be more immediate. For a tourist approaching Banff from the
bridge he would be given an immediate first impression 166
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
another town ruined with a modern supermarket structure; and
first impressions can be important for tourists to entice them
to want to stop.
Competition for local retailers
The Consultation document admits such a supermarket “may
result in a negative impact on other food, comparison, café
and petrol retailers in Banff and Macduff.”
A number of Huntly traders reported an impact when Asda
and Tesco moved to the outskirts of Huntly, and the impact
should not be underestimated.
Banff currently has a lot of café or similar outlets; yet another,
next door to an existing one (Spotty Bag) and a well-liked
mobile unit, can only reduce their usage since the stated aim is
to get residents to use Morrisons as a one-stop shop.
There are two petrol garages in Banff and Macduff and these
are rarely busy; adding a third would seem likely to result in
the closure of at least one.
Loss of equivalent sports facilities
The Consultation document admits that full equivalency has
not, perhaps not yet, been provided.
The cost to sports clubs of the offered replacement facilities is
said to be substantially higher than the facilities that used to
be used at Canal Park. This does not seem to tally with the
desire to have more people take part in sporting activities.
Inconsistency with the original gift
The Gift states “with absolutely no restrictions as to the
manner in which it is to be developed and managed”.
This phrase is taken out of context. The whole premise of the
Gift as is clearly stated is to provide a solution for “golf and
other recreations”. Not only that, but the phrase about no
restrictions, is qualified later in the sentence by including
“recreation and well-being of the community”.
To date the use of the gifted Duff land has been pretty
consistent with the original gift; however Friends of Duff
House see the use of Canal Park for a supermarket as
inconsistent with the whole premise of the original gift.
Links between Banff and Macduff
167
ID
Respondent
Name
Representation
Response
The original gift was aimed at improving the links between
the two towns. A supermarket accessible to residents of both
towns could aid this.
Or it could hinder this, as it could be viewed as yet another
facility for Banff, without anything in Macduff. The
bottleneck of Banff Bridge would add to such frustration, as
would ignoring the LDP provision for a large store site near
Myrus - especially when such a proposal has been made by
another supermarket chain.
Loss of common good land
The sale proceeds provide a six figure boost to the common
good fund of Banff and Macduff.
The sale proceeds will be a short term gain.
It is believed the original proposal for Tesco at Canal Park
when put to the Court of Session included for the replacement
of land into the common good portfolio, by adding in land at
Banff Academy. No such proposal has been stated in the
present consultation document.
Even if such a proposal of replacement land was made, it is
considered that land at Banff Academy is not an equivalent
replacement. The open and green space at Canal Park should
be replaced with equivalent land, both in area and nature.
Inconsistency with Scottish Government “A New Future for
Scotland’s Town Centres”.
The published updated thinking (since the 2013 National
Review of Town Centres document) refers to “healthier
greener and more sustainable urban and rural centres, where
social renewal and economic recovery is evident on the
ground”. In many places it refers to Town Centre plans to
include considerations about the “planet”.
While it is arguable whether this Canal Park proposal would
generate economic recovery, this proposal does the opposite
by removing the majority of the green area of the presently
designated Banff Town Centre area.
168