The seminar facilitators requested the attendees to fill out an evaluation form before the session
came to a close. The form required the participants to circle a number that matched their level of
agreement with each statement. A score of 4 indicated strongly agree, 3 agree, 2 indicated disagree,
and 1 indicated strongly disagree.
4= Strongly Agree
2= Disagree
3=Agree
1= Strongly Disagree
1.) The seminar objectives were stated clearly and met.
4
3
2
1
2.) The seminar was well organized.
4
3
2
1
3.) The information presented were relevant and useful.
4
3
2
1
4.) The seminar was appropriate for the audience.
4
3
2
1
5.) The speaker/s was able to address and answer all my
question.
4
3
2
1
6.) The speaker/s was knowledgeable and well prepared.
4
3
2
1
7.) The speaker/s facilitates and prepares activity that is
relevant to the topic.
4
3
2
1
8.) Speaker/s style of presenting is effective.
4
3
2
1
9.) The seminar was worth my time.
4
3
2
1
10.) I recommend that the seminar be repeated for other
students.
4
3
2
1
Out of the total participants who responded, 33 strongly agreed and 7 agreed that the seminar
objectives were met and stated clearly. As for the seminar's organization, 30 strongly agreed and
3 agreed that it was well-organized. 30 participants strongly agreed and 7 agreed that the
information presented was relevant and useful, while 30 strongly agreed and 3 agreed that the
seminar was appropriate for the audience. Furthermore, 30 participants strongly agreed and 3
agreed that the speaker/s was able to address and answer all their questions, while 30 strongly
agreed and 2 agreed that the speaker/s was knowledgeable and well-prepared. All participants
strongly agreed that the speaker/s facilitated and prepared activities that were relevant to the topic.
In terms of the speaker/s presenting style, 24 strongly agreed and 6 agreed that it was effective.
The seminar was worth their time for 29 participants who strongly agreed and 1 who agreed.
Finally, 25 strongly agreed and 5 agreed that the seminar should be repeated for other students.
After they evaluate, facilitators asked their comments and suggestions regarding the seminar they
conducted. Most comments were positive feedback and here are some of their comments:
“None, I think the seminar/event is neatly done and speakers are well prepared ^_^”
“Engaging the audience or more, adding q&a’s or letting the audience speak about their
opinions”
“None, all information is accurate and good”
“Some infos stated differ from what written on the visual aids mean”
“None, the seminar was great and relevant”
The facilitators appreciate and welcome the feedback they receive from participants, as it allows
them to evaluate their performance and identify areas for improvement in future seminars.
Participants' willingness to provide honest feedback is particularly appreciated, as it helps the
facilitators to understand what aspects of the event need improvement. By using this feedback
constructively, the facilitators can enhance the quality of their future seminars.