See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366386264 Mate Poaching Chapter · December 2022 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1744-1 CITATIONS READS 0 76 2 authors: Maryanne L. Fisher T Joel Wade Saint Mary's University Bucknell University 187 PUBLICATIONS 5,025 CITATIONS 85 PUBLICATIONS 1,196 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Psychology of Gossip View project Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science View project All content following this page was uploaded by Maryanne L. Fisher on 17 December 2022. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. SEE PROFILE M Mate Poaching Maryanne L. Fisher1 and T. Joel Wade2 1 Department of Psychology, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS, Canada 2 Department of Psychology, Bucknell University, Lewisburg, PA, USA Synonyms Mate-Stealing; Non-Independent Mate Choice Definition Mate poaching is engaging in premeditated behaviors to attract either short-term or longterm mates by luring them away from their already established relationship. Introduction Generally, mate poaching refers to behaviors whereby one attempts to romantically attract an individual away from an existing monogamous relationship. Mate poaching has been defined in two different ways in the literature, with the second definition serving as a clarification of the first definition. Schmitt and Buss (2001) originally defined mate poaching as the process of romantically attracting someone who is already in a relationship. However, Davies et al. (2007) pointed out that Schmitt and Buss’ (2001) definition allowed for an overestimation of the frequency of mate poaching, because it did not specify two important criteria that are necessary for mate poaching to have occurred. Davies et al. (2007) stipulated that the relationship must be exclusive such that sex with an individual other than one’s partner invalidates the relationship, and poachers must know that the relationship they are poaching from is exclusive. Thus, Davies et al. (2007) revised the definition of mate poaching such that it is said to occur when a person has attracted, or tried to attract, a mate whom they know is already in an existing exclusive relationship, in order to form a new sexual or romantic relationship. Further issues related to definition are discussed by Davies et al. (2019). It is helpful to distinguish mate poaching from other forms of romantic attraction. Mate poaching is distinct, because it presents costs that are not found during typical, early stages of relationship initiation or romantic attraction. For example, in addition to the potential rejection by the person one approaches, the person’s mate may learn of the attempted poaching and seek retaliation. These costs are further discussed in the following sections. Mate poaching also entails a specific set of personality characteristics, which are presented in an upcoming section. Evolutionary psychology offers a way to make sense of mate poaching. Mate poaching is a form of nonindependent mate choice that is an adaptive © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 T. K. Shackelford, V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1744-1 2 solution to the problem of locating a mate of suitable quality from the local pool of those whom are currently available. For men, this problem is thought to have been frequently occurring in ancestral environments where women, in particular, were mated early in life, pregnant much of their lifetime, and/or in situations involving polygyny where a few men dominated local mating contexts. For women, it would have been an adaptive solution to issues around resource control, such that women could try to invade an existing relationship to secure a mate with ownership of limited resources. Those resources, in turn, may positively have impacted on their ability to successfully bear and raise children, thereby improving their reproductive success and fitness. Putting all of these ideas together creates an interesting and unique mating-related situation. Mate poachers (i.e., those who poach someone’s mate) are theorized to engage in premeditated behaviors to attract either short-term or longterm mates via luring them away from their already established relationship (Moran and Wade 2019; Schmitt and Buss 2001). Mate poaching involves covert behaviors and indirect tactics, unlike other forms of romantic attraction, due to the potential risks involved in luring an already involved mate. Furtive glances, moving into one’s social network, and encouraging the target to realize the problems and dissatisfaction with their existing relationship are examples of the sorts of covert behaviors a poacher may perform. The discrete nature of romantic attraction is key, as direct flirting may lead to violence by an existing partner and be seen as in poor taste by the general social community (e.g., Schmitt and ISDP 2004). Of these various strategies of mate poaching, becoming the intended poachee’s friend is viewed as a very effective strategy which mitigates risk, However, individuals who use that strategy are perceived by others as less warm, less nurturant, and less friendly than those who merely make the acquaintance of the poachee (Mogilski and Wade 2013). Mate Poaching Occurrence and Prevalence Estimates regarding the prevalence of mate poaching vary, partly due to whether it is examined with respect to whether one attempts to lure a short- versus long-term mate, or whether it includes any experience versus frequent experience. For example, in a sample of US college students and older adults (average of 41 years), Schmitt and Buss (2001; study 1) report over 70% had experience in attracting an already involved partner, with about equal experience in attracting short- versus long-term mates. Almost 30% reported frequently trying to attract long-term mates, while 10% frequently attempted to attract short-term mates. Mate poaching specifically, though, was lower, with about 50% having some experience in short- or long-term relationships, with few stating they had frequent attempts. Their sample reported that rate of poaching toward oneself was higher, with an estimated 85% of people reporting someone had attempted to poach them (Schmitt and Buss 2001). There are some noteworthy sex differences. Schmitt and Buss (2001) found men (60–64%) are more likely to have attempted to poach a short-term mate than women (38–49%, depending on age). As an interesting aside, they reported that mate poaching tactics are perceived to be less effective when one attempts to infiltrate an existing highly committed relationship compared to less committed relationships. Davies et al. (2007) argued that these frequencies from Schmitt and Buss (2001) may be overestimates due to differences in their definition. They later reported their sampling procedure may also be responsible; using a similar procedure, Davies et al. (2019) found no significant difference in frequencies, as compared Schmitt and Buss (2001). In addition to the possible causes of variation in prevalence already mentioned, geographic location (as a proxy for culture) is an important consideration. Across a large sample (i.e., 53 nations, almost 17,000 participants), Schmitt and members of the International Sexuality Description Project (2004) found mate poaching was most common in Southern Europe, South Mate Poaching America, Western Europe, and Eastern Europe and was relatively infrequent in Africa, South/ Southeast Asia, and East Asia. Men were more likely than women to report having made and succumbed to short-term poaching across all regions, but the differences between men and women were often smaller in more genderegalitarian regions. That is, similar to the rates reported using the US samples, Schmitt et al. (2004) document around 62% of men and 40% of women have attempted to attract someone who was already in a relationship with someone else for a short-term sexual relationship. However, they argue that cultural differences exist: shortterm poaching is less among East Asian men (around 29%), and under 30% for women from Middle East, Africa, South/Southeast Asia, and East Asia. Men seldom engage in long-term mate poaching, with rates higher for women, although there are cultural differences in effects due to sex (i.e., Oceania shows minimal difference whereas Africa shows large differences). Those who attempt to mate poach tend to be moderately successful at a rate of 65% or higher (Schmitt et al. 2004, Table 4). Women are generally more successful at short-term mate poaching than men (particularly in Western Europe; 90% vs. 84%) but typically not significantly so, with the exception of Africa that shows the reverse trend (65.9% vs. 78.6%). The occurrence and prevalence of poaching for long-term relationships is similar for men and women, with no significant sex differences except for South America where more men report it ever happening (86% vs. 72%), and happening more often. They also found that about 70% of the sample worldwide reported receiving someone’s matepoaching attempt. Some scholars document minimal sex differences in prevalence rates of mate poaching, which is in contrast to the abovementioned research findings. While the literature on infidelity shows men report higher rates than women, poaching is reported nearly equally by the sexes. However, women, but not men, may show a distinct, increased interest in men who are involved in a relationship. That is, Parker and Burkley (2009) suggest mate copying may be a possible 3 explanation for women’s interest in mate poaching. Their experimental evidence shows men are interested in women to the same degree regardless of whether they are single or not, while single women are more interested in pursuing men who are attached than single. By engaging in mate copying, women are ensuring that the mate has been “pre-screened” for quality, resourcefulness, and willingness to commit to a family life, by another woman. This finding does not imply that men are immune from mate copying; Moran and Wade (2019) report that men are more likely to engage in mate copying when a couple is composed of a man who is more attractive than his partner. This pattern occurs because men view the woman in this couple as possessing very high qualities since she was selected by this highly attractive man. Finding and starting a relationship with a woman with characteristics similar to the woman in this couple would potentially confer benefits to the male copier’s future offspring. Costs Associated with Mate Poaching Mate poaching is a form of mating competition, and as such, it can lead to various forms of retaliation from the person who loses the mate. There may be immediate repercussions for poaching via violence or other forms of aggression. There may be also a decrease in social standing, given one has breached social norms around exclusivity and relationships (see Sunderani et al. 2013, for discussion). The poachers who are themselves currently in an existing, exclusive romantic relationship must deceive their partner. They may lie or manipulate their partner, keep themselves out of close proximity to the partner (e.g., “be away for work”), establish their independence (e.g., “I need space”), and perhaps increase their affection and resource allocation toward the current mate in an effort to avoid drawing suspicions of infidelity (Schmitt and Shackelford 2003). It may also lead to the presence of future infidelity concerns and feeling uncertain about the future of the relationship. There are other costs, too, such as feeling guilty, issues around 4 deception and lying, hiding the relationship, and potential rejection by one’s family (Schmitt and Buss 2001). Individuals who then form a relationship with the poacher (or person poached) may experience feelings of jealousy, emotional pain, anxiety, and sadness; they may face serious risks due to these emotions such as intimate partner violence and homicide (see Sunderani et al. 2013, for discussion). For men, there are also costs related to potentially depleting their resources while engaging in poaching behavior, especially if those resources could be used more productively to gain access to, and retain mates. Men who lose their partner to a mate poacher face further costs, not only do they experience the loss of a mate (i.e., the poached individual) but also they risk losing any invested resources. Misallocated investments may also stem from the possibility of raising a child who is genetically unrelated, if their partner is poached, becomes pregnant, and then returns to the relationship. Both sexes face the increased risk of illness; as one accesses new sexual partners, risks of sexually transmitted infections and diseases increase. There is also an increased probability of partner’s future infidelity, if they were successfully poached in the past. Women face additional costs of potential unwanted pregnancy, as well as potential feelings of self-degradation, and concerns about future infidelity (Schmitt and Buss 2001). Reasons to Poach a Mate The reasons to poach a mate vary. Schmitt and Buss (2001) found several potential reasons, as follows. First, within a long-term context, men may be enticed by a woman’s physical attractiveness while women may be enticed by a man with resources. Indeed, highly attractive women are more likely to be the targets of mate-poaching attempts and less likely to remain faithful in a relationship. Women do not show the same benefit of gaining an attractive mate via poaching although men who are targeted by poachers selfreport they are physically attractive (Sunderani et al. 2013). Men also report a potential benefit Mate Poaching of gaining access to a variety of sexual partners, as well as easy sexual access within short-term mate poaching contexts. Thus, sexual variety, attracting a beautiful partner, and freedom from responsibility for men are considered short-term benefits (Schmitt and Buss 2001). Men do not consider receiving resources as beneficial as women do, or consider gaining a partner with the ability to accrue resources as beneficial. Interestingly, the benefit of receiving immediate resources was considered strongest in women considering short-term mate poaching, as opposed to long-term mate poaching. Women also reported the additional reasons of taking revenge on a rival and gaining an already proven mate. Personality of Mate Poachers and Those Who Are Poached Schmitt and Buss (2001) examined various personality traits in relation to mate poaching. They found that agreeable and conscientious (i.e., care and think about other’s feelings) people are significantly less likely to be poachers regardless of sex. Further, those who self-describe as having erotophilic dispositions more likely to have tried to poach. Individuals who reported success at poaching generally are more sexually attractive and lack sexual exclusivity. Extraverts and those open to experience receive more mate-poaching attempts, as do those who describe themselves as being emotionally investing in a relationship. Disagreeable, unconscientious, and neurotic individuals tended to accept mate poachers’ advances, as did those describing themselves as mean, unreliable, adulterous, masculine, and unloving. A lower level of conscientiousness is associated with increased sexual risk-taking, as well as perceived benefit of such behaviors. The lack of empathy linked to being unconscientious, higher disagreeableness, and disregard for others’ wellbeing may empower individuals to poach a mate when faced with an opportunity and decrease their perception of any associated costs (Mitchell et al. 2019). Indeed, Foster et al. (2014) report that poachers tend to have more uninhibited sexual attitudes and behaviors. Poachers of both sexes Mate Poaching self-report a higher number of lifetime sex partners, more lifetime casual sex partners, and more lifetime dating partners (Arnocky et al. 2013). Sunderani et al. (2013) report that men who poach are better looking, taller, and have higher cortisol levels, which is a hormone that has been linked with impulsivity and extroversion. They also have higher self-esteem, which may lead them to believe they will be more successful at poaching and subsequently more likely to attempt to poach. They have higher criminal tendencies and more of a cold affect (i.e., little concern about others). They suggest that these characteristics enable the individual to behave without feeling empathy or facing moral objections with respect to poaching. They also surprisingly found that men with lower levels of testosterone were more successful at mate poaching, which requires further study. In contrast, they found for women who poach, the only important factor is that they are attractive. The dark triad of personality traits (DT) also matters. Kardum et al. (2015) reported that the DT predicts mate poaching experiences better than the Big Five traits, which are openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. These authors report that the DT trait of psychopathy and the Big Five trait of extraversion are the most consistent predictors of mate poaching experiences. However, there are also noteworthy sex differences. The DT better predicts being the target of a poaching attempt in women and being successfully poached in men. Also, the Big Five traits better predict success at mate poaching for men. The relationship between personality and mate poaching is small to moderate, according to Kardum et al. (2018). Poaching attempts, poaching success, and being the target of poaching appear to be more strongly related to personality than being successfully poached or being the victim of poaching. They further report that the link between mate poaching and personality are cross-cultural and similar in both shortand long-term relationships. 5 Targets of Mate Poaching There are particular qualities of individuals who make them more susceptible targets for being poached. For example, tactics related to mate poaching are perceived to be more effective when the relationship where someone is being poached from is long-distance, not committed, about to end, or that is a dating relationship (Schmitt and Buss 2001). The specific role of the type of relationship within a mate poaching context depends on the tactic. Women are viewed as most effective when they use tactics related to emphasizing their physical appearance, while men are seen as most effective when they emphasize their resources and generosity. In short-term contexts, women are perceived to be most effective when they advertise, provide, and arrange easy sexual access. Men who manipulated the emotional fidelity of the existing male partner were seen as effective at poaching, while women who manipulated the sexual fidelity of the existing female partner were also seen as effective (Schmitt and Buss 2001). Individuals who are extraverted and high in openness (sensation seekers), sexy, adulterous, or high in neuroticism are typical targets also. There may be sex differences also. Moran and Wade (2019) report that men are most likely to attempt to poach from a couple where there is a discrepancy in the attractiveness of the members of the couple. Specifically, men are more likely to attempt to poach from a couple where the woman is more attractive than her partner, and men think that a poaching attempt towards this type of couple will be most successful. The duration of the relationship matters also. Moran et al. (2017) and Moran and Wade (2019) report that for short-term mating, men are more willing to poach women who are more attractive than the mates those women are involved with in a relationship. Disguising Mate Poaching Since mate poaching can have dire consequences for mate poachers if their behavior is detected, individuals may disguise their poaching attempts. 6 Tooke and Camire (1991) point out that men in particular use a complex repertoire of deceptive tactics to gain access to reproductively viable women. Schmitt and Shackelford (2003) specifically examined tactics within the context of mate poaching, first within the context of how people signal an openness to being poached and then in terms of disguising their poaching. In the first part, they asked students (11 men and 18 women) to nominate behaviors that they think people perform while already in a relationship to let others know they are open to another relationship. The participants were asked to consider behaviors one might do to advertise an interest in short- and long-term relationships. Then, they asked students (26 men and 46 women) to rate the effectiveness of the behaviors in signaling interest in a new relationship. They found the most effective tactics for men seeking a shortterm relationship were to enhance the potential mate (e.g., boost her ego, compliment her, tell her she deserves someone better), use humor, and be generous (e.g., show they are caring, polite, helps her with work or chores), while for women, it was arranging and providing easy sexual access, and enhancing the potential mate. For men, seeking a long-term relationship effective tactics were the same, while for women, it was to develop emotional closeness (confide in him, try to be a good friend, discuss mutual interests), mention they are looking for a replacement mate, and being generous. In the second part, they again used an act nomination approach and asked students (20 men, 37 women) to list ways people disguise mate-poaching attempts for short- and long-term relationships. The poachers were stated to currently be in a relationship and who are attempting to disguise their actions in order to maintain that relationship. Then, another group of students (36 men and 44 women) rated the effectiveness of the tactics. The results indicated that the most effective ways to disguise mate-poaching attempts by men are as follows: talk with current partner about their future together as a family, pay closer attention to their current partner, keep constant watch on their current partner to see if they have suspicions, have deep emotional talks with Mate Poaching their current partner, spend more quality time with the current partner, pretend one is happy with the current partner, spend less time away from the current partner, tell the current partner he is satisfied with their relationship, and do not discuss the new partner with anyone. The researchers also examined what the most effective ways for women to disguise their poaching attempts are. Like men, many of these tactics are oriented toward their current romantic partner, such that they are attempting to maintain that relationship. The tactics are: maintain her daily routine to avoid causing suspicion, do not change her physical look, always return home at same time each day, wear her relationship (e.g., wedding, engagement, promise) ring all the time, do not discuss the new partner with anyone, become more romantic with the current partner, attend fewer parties so as to be seen less, have sex more often with the current partner, rekindle the romance of the current relationship, and do not act like anything is different. The authors also examined how many of these actions are also effective for men and women to keep their social community from knowing they are engaged in mate poaching (Schmitt and Shackelford 2003). However, while there is overlap in some tactics, there are also tactics that seem specifically oriented toward hiding information about the mate poaching from one’s social community. For men, the most effective ways are as follows: do not discuss the new partner with anyone, keep a constant watch on the current partner, think before he speaks in public, have deep emotional talks with the current partner, spends less time away from the current partner, behave affectionately toward the current partner, talk with the current partner about their future together as a family, pretend he is happy with the current partner, and get the current partner pregnant. A similar list was obtained for women; the most effective ways for women to disguise their poaching attempts are as follows: maintain her daily routine, do not change her physical look, always return home at same time each day, do not act like anything is different, keep her conversation routine and not talk about what is really Mate Poaching going on in her life, never tell anyone about her new partner, keep the current partner sexually satisfied, wear her relationship ring all the time, behave affectionately toward the current partner, and rekindle the romance of the current relationship. Schmitt and Shackelford (2003) concluded that overall, women are most effective at mate poaching when they advertised or provided sexual intimacy and discounted improvements in physical appearance. Women were seen to be most effective at disguising their mate poaching when maintaining daily routines. For men, the most effective tactics are when they advertised their resources and used tactics related to establishing an emotional connection. The best disguise for men was when they talked to their current partner about their future together as a family. Some of these findings have been recently replicated. For example, Moran and Wade (2017) performed a two-part study. In study 1, they asked heterosexual men to nominate acts they would use to mate poach someone specifically for a short-term relationship. In study 2, men and women reported which of those acts would be most effective. The most effective acts were spending time together, being attentive, being compassionate, helping her with her problems, and complimenting her. The authors propose these acts, when performed by men, signal altruism and emotional commitment, which women prefer in mates. Relationships Outcomes Despite the volume of research on mate poaching, there has been a dearth of investigation into the quality of relationships involving poached individuals. Two studies are worth noting, though, that address this issue. Foster et al. (2014) examined the relationship quality of 138 heterosexual young adults over a 10-week period. They reported that poached individuals perceive potential relationship alternatives to be higher in quality and have more infidelity in their current relationship than non-poached individuals. Poached individuals are less committed 7 to their current relationship and less satisfied overall, as compared to those who were not poached. Belu and O’Sullivan (2018) extended this prior work by examining a variety of issues related to relationship quality in 675 heterosexual adults, which included a specifically solicited sample of those with mate poaching experience. They report individuals in romantic relationships formed by poaching rated their relationships as having lower satisfaction, commitment, and trust, higher jealousy, and higher rates of emotional and sexual infidelity compared to those in non-poached relationships (Belu and O’Sullivan 2018; largely replicating Foster et al. 2014). Further, those who were poached compared to those who did the poaching also rated their current relationship as lower in commitment (Belu and O’Sullivan 2018). The link between poaching and relationship quality is influenced by sociosexuality. Poachers tend to have more permissive and less restrictive views of sexual behavior, and require less commitment which is often the cornerstone of exclusive relationships. Thus, is it not surprising that mate poachers have an increased probability of engaging in an infidelity while in a relationship (Belu and O’Sullivan 2019). Sexual Versus Emotional Mate Poaching One area for future research may be to further investigate how mate poaching may occur in sexual versus emotional contexts. Research into infidelity has typically examined it in terms of whether the behaviors relate to sexual infidelity or emotional infidelity. Mitchell et al. (2019) extended this work by examining sexual versus emotional mate poaching. They report that mate poachers who engaged in sexual intimacy with their poached partner differed the most from those who did not poach their current partner on several dimensions, including higher antagonism, disinhibition, risk-taking, and lower humility and honesty. They further documented that men who engaged in sexual intimacy with their poached partner reported higher levels of detachment, antagonism, disinhibition, psychopathy, and lower levels of conscientiousness, humility, and 8 honesty. The authors suggest that this combination of traits may allow a mate poacher to maintain a physical relationship with an already partnered individual because it includes a willingness to deceive and manipulate others for personal gain, and the discounting of potential costs. For comparison, men who engaged in emotional mate poaching still reported high levels of antagonism, disinhibition, and ethical risk-taking, and lower scores for humility and honesty than non-poachers. However, their scores were lower for ethical risk-taking than men who engaged in physical mate poaching. The researchers propose that the differences between the two poaching groups may be due to seeking alternative paths to poaching. That is, men who engage in emotional mate poaching may be attempting to establish a romantic bond with trust rather than sexual access. Women, for comparison, did not demonstrate as many differences between the two forms of poaching as men, and most of the traits were not exhibited as strongly as men. Conclusions In this entry, we briefly reviewed the extensive literature on mate poaching. Our review started with issues surrounding differences in definitions of the behavior, and how it is distinct from other forms of romantic attraction. We then discuss prevalence, showing that there is cross-cultural variation in mate poaching, but also differences according to an individual’s sex and according to whether one examines any poaching experiences or frequent experiences. The considerable costs associated with mate poaching were reviewed, followed by a discussion about the potential benefits one may receive. We then shifted our focus to present an overview of some of the findings about personality of those involved in mate poaching relationships, as well as characteristics of targeted individuals. Research on how mate poaching may be disguised was reviewed, along with details about some of the tactics men and women are thought to use. We presented the small body of research on the outcomes of Mate Poaching relationships that started with one individual being poached. We then ended our review with an example of an area for future research, which is the examination of mate poaching along sexual versus emotional lines, akin to the large corpus of work on infidelity. Collectively, our review demonstrates the variety of ways mate poaching has been explored using the lens of evolutionary psychology and how the topic has changed in scope over time. Cross-References ▶ Personality and Mate Poaching ▶ Costs and Benefits of Mate Poaching ▶ Use of Mate Retention Strategies References Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Mate-poaching and mating success in humans. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 65–83. Belu, C. F., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2018). Why find my own when I can take yours?: The quality of relationships that arise from successful mate poaching. Journal of Relationships Research, 9(e6), 1–10. Belu, C. F., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2019). Once a poacher always a poacher? Mate poaching history and its association with relationship quality. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.16 10150. pre-print. Davies, A. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Hass, R. G. (2007). When a ‘poach’ is not a poach: Re-defining human mate poaching and re-estimating its frequency. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 702–716. Davies, A. P. C., Tranter, A. E., & Shackelford, T. K. (2019). Not clearly defined, not reliably measured, and not replicable: Revisiting the definition and measurement of human mate poaching. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 103–105. Foster, J. D., Jonason, P. K., Shrira, I., Campbell, W. K., Shiverdecker, L. K., & Varner, S. C. (2014). What do you get when you make someone else’s partner your own? An analysis of relationships formed via mate poaching. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 78–90. Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., Schmitt, D. P., & Grundler, P. (2015). Personality and mate poaching experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 7–12. Kardum, I., Hudek-Knezevic, J., & Mehic, N. (2018). Entry: Personality and mate poaching. In Mate Poaching T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. Cham: Springer. Mitchell, V. E., Mogilski, J. K., Zeigler-Hill, V., & Welling, L. L. M. (2019). Mate poaching strategies are differentially associated with pathological personality traits and risk-taking in men and women. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 110–115. Mogilski, J. K., & Wade, T. J. (2013). Friendship as a relationship infiltration tactic during human mate poaching. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(4), 147470491301100415. Moran, J., & Wade, T. J. (2017). Sex and the perceived effectiveness of short-term mate poaching acts in college students. Human Ethology Bulletin, 32(3), 109–128. Moran, J. B., & Wade, T. J. (2019). Perceptions of a mismatched couple: The role of attractiveness on mate poaching and copying. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, online. Moran, J. B., Kuhle, B. X., Wade, T. J., & Seid, M. A. (2017). To poach or not to poach? Men are more willing to short-term poach mated women who are more attractive than their mates. EvoS Journal: The Journal of Evolutionary Studies Consortium, 8, 58–69. View publication stats 9 Parker, J., & Burkley, M. (2009). Who’s chasing whom: The impact of gender and relationship status on mate poaching. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1016–1019. Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 894–917. Schmitt, D. P., & International Sexuality Description Project. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person’s partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 560–584. Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2003). Nifty ways to leave your lover: The tactics people use to entice and disguise the process of human mate poaching. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 1018–1035. Sunderani, S., Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Individual differences in mate poaching: An examination of hormonal, dispositional, and behavioral mate-value traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 533–545. Tooke, W., & Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12(5), 345–364.