BEFORE THE HON’BLE COURT OF SH VIRENDER BHATT, DJ (COMM), ROHINI
COURTS,DELHI
IN RE
CS COMM NO-____/21
IN THE MATTER OF
…PLAINTIFF
PUSHPA DEVI AGARWAL
VERSUS
…DEFENDANTS
M/S BHOJ RAJ HARISH KUMAR & ORS
ADDITIONAL AFFIDAVIT OF ADMISSION/DENIAL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT
I, Shanti Devi W/o Sh. Bhoj Raj aged about __ Years, R/o BW-115-B, Shalimar Bagh,
Delhi-110052, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under.
1. I am the defendant in the abovementioned case and competent to swear this
affidavit.
2. That admission/denial of documents filed by the Plaintiff with the list of
documents along with the suit are as under:S. No
1.
Name of the
document
filed by the
defendant
Whether document’s following particulars are admitted
or denied.
Demand
Note Date
Correctness
of Contents
The
(first) Denied, does
promissory
not pertains to
the defendant
note,
certificate,
certificate of
payment and
receipt dated
02.04.2016
for
Rs10,00,000/executed by
the
defendants in
Existe
nce
executio
n/
Issuance/
receipt
Cust
ody
Execut
ed by
the
defend
ants
Executed
by the
defendant
s
Executed
by the
defendant
s
N.A
favour
plaintiff.
of
2.
The bank
Denied, does
statementnot pertains to
relevant page the defendant
of the
plaintiffs bank
showing the
entry of Rs10,000,00/as was paid
to the
defendants
against
promissory
note dated
02.04.2016.
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
3
The (second)
original
promissory
note,
certificate,
certificate of
payment and
receipt dated
12.04.2016
for
Rs.5,00,000/executed by
the
defendants in
favour of
plaintiff.
Execut
ed by
the
defend
ants
Executed
by the
defendant
s
Executed
by the
defendant
s
N.A
4
The
bank Denied, does
statement
not pertains to
relevant page the defendant
of the plaintiff
bank showing
the entry of
Rs-5,00,000/as was paid
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
Denied, does
not pertains to
the defendant
to
the
defendants
against
promissory
note
dated
12.04.2016.
5
The (third)
original
promissory
note,
certificate of
payment and
receipt dated
01.04.2017
for
Rs.10,00,000
/- executed
by the
defendants in
favour of
plaintiff.
Execut
ed by
the
defend
ants
Executed
by the
defendant
s
Executed
by the
defendant
N.A
6.
The “bank
Denied, does
statement
not pertains to
relevant page the defendant
of the
plaintiff’s
bank showing
the entry of
Rs10,000,00/as was paid
to the
defendants
against
promissory
note vide
cheque no.
002173 dated
01.04.2017
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
7
The
ledger Denied, does
accounts of not pertains to
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
Denied, does
not pertains to
the defendant
the
plaintiff the defendant
for
the
financial year
2016-2017,
17-18, 18-19,
19-20
showing the
transactions
with
the
defendants
and interest
received.
8
The
Bank Denied, does
Statement
not pertains to
the defendant
relevant
pages of the
Plaintiff’s
Bank
showing the
entry of the
interest
received by
the
plaintiff
from
the
defendants
during
the
period
of
2016 to 2019.
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
9
The
Form Denied, does
26AS of the not pertains to
the defendant
Plaintiff
showing the
TDS
deducted by
the
defendants
for
the
assessment
Year 201718,201819,2019-
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
20,2020-21.
10
Legal Notice
dated
26.02.2021.
Denied
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
11
Denied
Original
Postal
Receipts for
the
Legal
Notice.
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
12
Copy of the Denied
tracking
report
of
postal
receipts.
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
13
Denied
Original
Postal
Envelop
returned from
the defendant
no.1.
N.A
N.A
N.A
N.A
14
Denied
“Non-Starter
Report”
issued by the
pre-Institution
Mediation
Centre
for
Commercial
Court Cases.
Tis
Hazari
Courts,
District
Central,
Delhi.
Physica
l Copy
issued
by the
DLSA
Rohini
Court
Physical
Copy
issued by
the DLSA
Rohini
Court
Physical
Copy
issued by
the DLSA
Rohini
Court
N.A
Deponent
VERIFICATION:Verified at New Delhi on this
day of March, 2023 that the contents of the
aforesaid affidavit are true and correct. No part of it is false and nothing material has
been concealed.
Deponent