3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Perioperative Evaluation of
Nutritional Status to Predict
Complications in Patients with
Major Lower Extremity Amputation
Daisy L. Spoer, Stephanie E. Shin, Kevin G. Kim, Zoë K. Haffner,
Kirsten S. Linnartz, Christopher E. Attinger, Karen K. Evans
Keywords
Major Lower Extremity
Amputation
Perioperative Care
Plastic Surgery
Nutritional Status
Wound Healing
March 2023
ISSN 1044-7946
Index Wounds. 2023;35(3):59-65. doi:10.25270/wnds/22070
Abstract
Introduction. Optimization of nutritional status is critical in postoperative wound healing.
Perioperative Alb and pAlb levels have been used as proxies for overall nutritional status.
Objective. This study examines if such biomarkers correlate with postoperative
complications after MLEA for chronic wounds. Materials and Methods. A retrospective
review of patients undergoing MLEA at a single institution from January 2017 through
October 2021 was performed. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, and
perioperative laboratory values. The primary outcomes were surgical dehiscence,
hematoma, and infection within 30 days of surgery. Results. A total of 303 patients
undergoing MLEA met the inclusion criteria. At the threshold of less than 3.2 g/dL for low
Alb, no significance was found for any postoperative complications. The threshold of less
than 10 mg/dL for low pAlb was associated with significantly increased infection rates. At
the threshold of less than 9 mg/dL for low pAlb, hematoma and infection were significantly
increased compared with the defined normal perioperative pAlb. Alternatively, low Alb
(<3.2 g/dL) did not correlate with postoperative complications. Conclusions. Further
investigation of validated biomarkers and their thresholds is needed to guide perioperative
optimization of nutritional status after MLEA for chronic wounds.
Abbreviations
AKA, above-knee amputation; Alb, albumin; BKA, below-knee amputation; CI, confidence
interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; MLEA, major lower
extremity amputation; OR, odds ratio; pAlb, prealbumin.
Introduction
Beyond their use in the management of traumatic injuries, MLEAs are highly morbid procedures
performed for the treatment of dysvascular conditions such as end-stage critical limb ischemia
and diabetic foot ulcer.1,2 In individuals undergoing MLEA for these conditions, between 13%
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
1/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
and 30% experience postoperative complications, and the associated 1-year mortality rate is
approximately 30%.3-5 Identification of factors
associated with such postoperative complications is imperative to minimizing morbidity.
Perioperative malnutrition is a well-known prognostic factor for surgical outcomes; Alb is a
visceral protein that is often used as a surrogate for nutritional status and postoperative
complications.6-13 The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism and the American
Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition define chronic disease-related malnutrition and
acute disease or injury-related malnutrition as malnutrition caused by acute or chronic
inflammation.14,15 However, objectively measuring malnutrition in a chronically inflamed
population has proven difficult.16 Low Alb is not specific for malnutrition because of its
confounding role as a negative acute phase reactant.9 Further, Alb has a long half-life, between
2 to 3 weeks; thus, deficiencies may be more indicative of chronic nutrition than perioperative
status.17 In contrast, pAlb has a short biological half-life of about 2 days, which suggests that it
may be a more accurate biomarker for acute changes in nutritional status.6-13,18-20
Investigation of nutrition within the chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot ulcer
populations reveals that preoperative nutritional index scores and Alb are independent predictors
of morbidity and mortality.21,22 However, the investigation of hypoalbuminemia in patients
undergoing lower extremity amputation is much more limited.7 To the knowledge of the authors
of the present study, there are no published studies on the predictive role of perioperative pAlb
and Alb on postoperative complications in this patient population. Therefore, the principal aim of
the present study was to assess Alb and pAlb levels and explore their relationship to
postoperative complications in patients undergoing MLEA for chronic wounds.
Materials and Methods
Data Source and Patient Population
A retrospective review of data from patients who underwent MLEA at a tertiary wound care
center from January 2017 to October 2021 was performed. The 3 documented criteria
necessary for inclusion were MLEA, defined as a BKA or knee disarticulation; Alb level recorded
within 30 days or pAlb level recorded within 5 days of MLEA; and follow-up within 30 days after
surgery. This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB No. 2018-173).
Perioperative Management
Patients were clinically evaluated perioperatively for medical comorbidities, nonhealing wounds,
vascular disease, and the need for preoperative debridement and revascularization. Patients on
outpatient anticoagulation regimens were transitioned to heparin when necessary for the
maintenance of anticoagulation. Following their initial operation, patients were readmitted to the
inpatient floor for additional medical and surgical management. This included multidisciplinary
management of antibiotic administration, nutritional supplementation, and serial surgical
debridement as necessary. Nutritional status was managed per the recommendations of the
consulted dietician.
Pre- and post-debridement qualitative wound cultures were obtained at every operating room
visit. Antibiotic administration was determined based on wound culture sensitivity. Per the
judgment of each surgeon, the resolution of any preoperative infections was ensured via
laboratory markers, qualitative wound cultures, and clinical assessments. If started, heparin was
continued until the final closure of amputation, at which point outpatient medications were
restarted, generally 24 to 48 hours postoperatively. After discharge, follow-up visits took place in
the outpatient wound center clinic at weekly, biweekly, and monthly intervals as necessary per
site healing and surgeon preference.
Outcome Variables and Study Groups
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
2/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect preoperative and postoperative variables of
interest. Preoperative data included patient demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative
laboratory values. The primary outcomes of interest were surgical hematoma and infection
following MLEA. Hematoma was defined as blood collection at the surgical site requiring
intervention. Infections were determined based on purulent drainage, positive postoperative
cultures, erythema around surgical incisions, or physician diagnosis. Secondary outcomes
included dehiscence, reamputation, and the occurrence of postoperative complications.
Complications that occurred within the first 30 days postoperatively were included for all
patients. Patients were initially stratified according to preoperative nutritional markers, using
standard clinically accepted thresholds of Alb less than 3.2 g/dL and pAlb less than 10 mg/dL for
poor nutritional status.16,23 Additional outcomes analysis at serially decreasing thresholds for
preoperative Alb (in increments of 0.1 g/dL) and pAlb (in increments of 1 mg/dL) was also
performed to identify thresholds that would yield significance for the major outcomes of interest.
Preoperative demographics, perioperative laboratory values, and 30-day follow-up data were
analyzed to determine independent predictors for the primary and secondary outcomes.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Stata/BE Software (Version 17, StataCorp LLC) and
Prism (version 8.0.0 for Mac OS X; GraphPad Software). The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed
to assess the normality of continuous variables. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all
patient data, including basic and advanced parameters. All variables were compared between
low and normal Alb and pAlb groups using bivariate analysis, using the Mann-Whitney test and
unpaired 2-tailed t test as appropriate for continuous variables and the chi-square or Fisher
exact test for categorical variables.
Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to calculate unadjusted ORs for hematoma and
infection at the defined thresholds for pAlb (10 mg/dL) and Alb (3.2 g/dL). Variables that reached
statistical significance in univariate analysis were included in multivariable regression analysis.
Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent effects of pAlb and Alb on
postoperative complications while controlling for confounding factors in the model. Statistical
significance was defined as P<.05.
Results
Patient Demographics
A total of 337 patients who underwent lower leg amputation were identified. The study included
303 patients with Alb data, 76% of whom had low perioperative Alb levels (<3.2 g/dL). Of the 206
patients with pAlb data, 40% had low perioperative pAlb levels (<10 mg/dL). The mean age of
all 303 patients was 59.9 years ± 13.7 standard deviation. Demographic data for low and normal
Alb and pAlb groups are presented in Table 1.
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
3/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
Patients with Alb less than 3.2 g/dL were significantly older than patients with normal Alb levels
(61.3 years ± 12.8 and 55.4 years ± 15.4, respectively; P =.032). A higher proportion of patients
in the low Alb group had diabetes (81.0% vs. 65.3%; P =.001), ESRD (37.2% vs. 21.8%; P
=.01), and lower mean hemoglobin (8.6 g/dL vs. 9.9 g/dL; P <.001) compared with patients with
normal Alb levels. Patients with pAlb levels less than 10 mg/dL were older than patients with
normal pAlb levels (63.1 years ± 14.2 vs. 57.4 years ± 14.0; P =.042) and had higher CRP levels
(75.4 mg/L ± 52.7 vs. 41.5 mg/L ± 35.7; P =.002), but they were less likely to have ESRD (21.7%
vs. 39.0%; P =.01). No other significant differences were found between these groups. A
separate analysis of low pAlb (<9 mg/dL) and normal pAlb (≥9 mg/dL) found that patients with
pAlb less than 9 mg/dL were significantly older (64.8 years ± 13.6 vs. 57.2 years ± 14.1; P
=.003) and had higher CRP levels (77.8 mg/L ± 57.4 vs. 44.2 mg/L ± 35.6; P =.012).
Prealbumin and Surgical Complications
Low pAlb at the threshold of less than 10 mg/dL was associated with a significantly higher rate
of infection (12.1% vs. 3.3%; P =.014) and nonsignificant increases in hematoma rate (4.8% vs.
0.8%; P =.067) compared with normal pAlb (Table 2). For low pAlb at the threshold less than 9
mg/dL, both the hematoma rate (6.0% vs. 0.7%; P =.021) and infection rate (12.0% vs. 4.3%; P
=.039) increased significantly
compared with pAlb greater than or equal to 9 mg/dL (Table 2). On bivariate regression analysis,
low pAlb was found to be associated with increased odds of hematoma at the thresholds of less
than 10 mg/dL (OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 1.02-105.90) and less than 9 mg/dL (OR, 7.07; 95% CI, 1.28132.10) and increased odds of infection at those respective levels (OR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.3613.04 and OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.11-7.72, respectively). On multivariate analysis, pAlb was the
only independent predictive factor of hematoma when controlling for age and CRP level (P
=.021). However, neither age (P =.848), CRP level (P =.687), nor pAlb level (P =.168) was found
to be an independent predictor of infection. No significant differences were found between
groups with low or normal pAlb at either the 10 mg/dL threshold or the 9 mg/dL threshold (<10
mg/dL vs. ≥10 mg/dL; <9 mg/dL vs. ≥9 mg/dL) for dehiscence rate (7.2% vs. 10.6%; 9.0% vs.
9.3%), reamputation rate (3.6% vs. 0.8%; 3.0% vs. 1.4%), or overall complications rate (19.3%
vs. 13.8%; 21.0% vs. 13.7%) (Table 2).
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
4/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
Albumin
No significant differences were found between the low Alb and normal Alb groups (<3.2 g/dL vs.
≥3.2 g/dL) in terms of hematoma rate (3.0% vs. 2.8%; P =.912) or infection rate (7.8% vs. 8.3%;
P =.882) (Table 2). Bivariate regression analysis found no association between low Alb and
hematoma (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.26-7.45), infection (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.37-2.65), or
dehiscence (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.45-3.10). No significant differences were found between the
low Alb and normal Alb groups (<3.2 g/dL vs. ≥3.2 g/dL) for dehiscence (9.1% vs. 8.3%),
reamputation (2.6% vs. 2.8%), and overall complications (16.9% vs. 18.1%) (Table 2).
Discussion
This study demonstrates an increased propensity towards postoperative infection in patients
with perioperative malnutrition when defined as a pAlb level less than 10 mg/dL. By contrast, low
Alb (<3.2 g/dL) did not significantly predict postoperative complications (infection, hematoma, or
dehiscence). Analysis at serially decreasing minimum thresholds revealed that pAlb less than 9
mg/dL was independently associated with increased rates of hematoma postoperatively. This
suggests that acute malnutrition, indicated by perioperative pAlb less than 10 mg/dL or less than
9 mg/dL, can predict short-term complications in patients
who have undergone MLEA.16,24 The results of the present study suggest that perioperative
pAlb may have more utility than Alb in predicting MLEA-specific complications in the immediate
postoperative period.16,24
Preoperative malnutrition is associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with
dysvascular disease.25 Individuals who undergo MLEA for acute complications of chronic
disease fulfill criteria for malnutrition according to the Nutritional Risk Screening and the
Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool for adults, which may require intervention depending on
the patient’s age, weight, decompensation, perioperative diet, and length of hospital stay.26
Further, screening with the Mini Nutritional Assessment for persons age 65 and older would
suggest that all such patients, regardless of disease or nutritional status, would possibly be at
risk of malnutrition after MLEA owing to their mobility status and recent physical stress.26
The Center for Wound Healing and Hyperbaric Medicine at MedStar Georgetown University
Hospital uses a multidisciplinary approach aimed at optimizing aspects of care via collaboration
between specialists, including plastic surgeons, registered dieticians, vascular surgeons,
podiatrists, infectious diseases physicians, rheumatologists, orthotists/prosthetists, and
peripheral nerve surgeons.27 Postoperatively, these team members ensure enhanced blood
flow, infection control, and augmented biomechanical function to provide the ideal setting for
recovery after MLEA. Preoperatively, a standardized nutritional support algorithm is used to
initiate and individualize the nutritional consult before amputation. Based on recommendations
by a registered dietician, patients are routinely placed on a high-protein diet and high-protein
oral nutritional supplements. Goal protein intake is guided by wound status and signs of protein
malnutrition, such as muscle wasting, typically ranging from 1 to 1.5 g/kg daily.28,29
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
5/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
The integration of nutritional assessment and intervention is particularly relevant for patients
undergoing MLEA for nontraumatic indications owing to the increased nutritional demand
associated with chronic and acute disease and surgical procedures and the projected
implications for mobility.25 Excessive inflammation resulting from injury and disease induces a
state of increased resting energy expenditure (hypermetabolic state), anorexia, poor absorption,
and negative nitrogen balance (hypercatabolic state).24,30,31 However, preoperative evaluation
and correction of these increased nutritional demands is limited in acute presentations.24
Therefore, it is of paramount importance to use algorithmic approaches to the perioperative
diagnosis and management of these pervasive nutritional deficits.25 Incorporating the use of
biomarkers into nutritional support algorithms may increase the precision of perioperative
supplementation.16,29,32-35 In the present study, using the clinically defined thresholds of 3.2 g/dL
for Alb and 10 mg/dL for pAlb, 76.2% of the patients studied would be considered chronically
malnourished and 40.29% would be considered acutely malnourished. Because nutritional
optimization has a greater effect on pAlb than Alb, this discrepancy may reflect the effect of
perioperative nutritional optimization.29
The findings of the present study add to the literature surrounding the perioperative nutritional
implications of biomarkers by emphasizing the potential role of pAlb in the nutritional evaluation
of patients following MLEA for nontraumatic indications. In surgical patients, Alb is frequently
used as a biomarker for nutritional status and predicts long-term complications, including
postoperative morbidity and mortality, in a dose-response manner, although it inconsistently
predicts short-term complications.3,7,10,13,24,32,36-41 The causal relationship between
hypoalbuminemia and adverse surgical outcomes is thought to be largely a consequence of
chronic inflammation.16,18,24 Hypoalbuminemia further impedes wound healing by precipitating
reactive oxygen species, interstitial edema, and tissue catabolism.24 At low levels, Alb may
predispose to complications by its failure to regulate inflammation, osmotic pressure, acid-base
status, oxidation, and coagulation (Figure).10,38,42,43 Therefore, it stands to reason that a
person with chronic disease or chronic low nutritional intake would also have low Alb and
subsequently have more adverse postoperative complications compared with a person with no
comorbidities or with sufficient nutritional intake. The present study focused primarily on the
propensity for short-term complications after MLEA. For such dependent variables, no
statistically significant associations between Alb level and postoperative complications were
observed. This may be because of the relative homogeneity of this population and the stability of
Alb levels in the immediate setting of acute inflammation.
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
6/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
In the immediate perioperative setting of MLEA for severe wounds, ischemia, or infection,
nutritional demands often abruptly increase as the result of extensive surgery, worsening
disease status, or dietary restriction. At baseline, a majority of patients in the present study had
diabetes or peripheral arterial disease, and many had ESRD, all of which would likely predict
chronically lower Alb. The added nutritional demands of an acute illness, surgery, immobility, and
prolonged hospital stay increase the overall nutritional demand. Still, fluctuations in energy
requirements may not be captured by changes in Alb level during hospitalization. Further, it has
not yet been determined if nutritional support can correct hypoalbuminemia.16,18,28,44 Thus, Alb
may not be the ideal biomarker for evaluating abrupt changes in nutritional demand in the
perioperative setting.3,5,8,18,22,29,32,39,44-47
In contrast, pAlb may be more helpful in evaluating the nutritional needs of patients undergoing
MLEA as a result of complications from chronic diseases. pAlb has a much shorter half-life than
albumin (~2 days vs. 2-3 weeks, respectively) in the range of CRP (t1⁄2 ~19 hours), which may
more precisely reflect fluctuations in a patient’s perioperative nutritional demands.48 Unlike CRP,
pAlb is synthesized in greater amounts, is inversely related to inflammation, and has been
demonstrated to predict recovery from malnutrition and overall disease.16,24,30,43,44 Further, a
low pAlb level has been found to be predictive of short-term surgical complications such as
surgical site infection, poor wound healing, and free flap compromise.16,38,46,49-51 The results of
the present study corroborate the findings of these previous studies and suggest that a low pAlb
level may be associated with postoperative infection and hematoma following nontraumatic
MLEA.
Malnutrition is thought to impair wound healing in part owing to immune system
compromise.2,10,18,24,31,42,52-54 Mechanistically, this may be related in part to a low pAlb level.
The primary physiologic function of pAlb is to aid in transporting both thyroxine and vitamin
A.4,19,43,55-57 Thus, a sudden drop in pAlb levels can cause hyperthyroidism (catabolism and
hypermetabolism) and disruption of retinol transport (impaired lymphocyte maturation and
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
7/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
weakened immune responses).41,43 It seems as though a low pAlb level may influence the
prolonged infections, inflammation, and poor wound healing observed in patients with acute and
chronic inflammation.41,43 Although the topic is beyond the scope of the present study, pAlb may
also be useful in perioperative monitoring because pAlb has been observed to rise with enteral
nutritional intervention and recovery from infection.24,30,58-63
Although biomarkers cannot reliably diagnose malnutrition, Alb and pAlb provide additional
information that can complement the clinical nutritional assessment of individuals experiencing
chronic or acute inflammation. Patients who require nontraumatic MLEA often have
compromised nutritional reserves and may require increased nutrition following amputation
owing to diet, resting energy expenditure, and decreased mobility. The results of the present
study suggest that clinical application of pAlb may deepen the perioperative nutritional
assessment of this high-risk population and encourage further investigation of its utility in
experimental evaluations of nutritional supplementation.6,50,52,64
Limitations
The conclusions of the present study are inherently limited by the retrospective design and the
consistency of medical documentation. In addition, the independent variables assessed in this
study and corroborated for nutritional evaluation are greatly affected by individual and dynamic
patient characteristics related to surgical procedure, perioperative medication use, disease
profiles, and dietary composition.25 Thus, assessing the need for intervention requires an
understanding of the competing external influences on these biomarkers. While the authors of
the present study controlled for the covariates with significance on univariate analysis, this
single-institution study has limited generalizability, and several factors require further
investigation. In terms of procedural influences, AKAs are calorically more demanding than
BKAs and may require more rigorous evaluation and treatment. Regarding medical
management, medications such as warfarin are often manipulated in the perioperative setting,
and the reciprocal interactions with Alb and pAlb may predispose patients to complications.65,66
These areas of future work are expected to refine the relationship between Alb and pAlb and
outcomes according to multidisciplinary care with integrated nutritional assessment,
perioperative pharmacologic regimen, CRP/pAlb ratio, amputation level (AKA vs. BKA), and
perioperative nutrition (ie, diet or nutritional supplementation).11,67,68
Conclusions
The findings of the present study suggest that pAlb may be a useful biomarker in the
armamentarium for the perioperative nutritional evaluation of patients undergoing MLEA for the
management of chronic wounds. Specifically, it was observed that a low perioperative pAlb level
was associated with postoperative hematoma (pAlb <10 mg/dL) and infection (pAlb <9 mg/dL).
By contrast, a low perioperative Alb level (<3.2 g/dL) was not predictive of postoperative
complications. This remained true for serially decreasing levels of Alb. These findings expand
the literature and indicate areas for further research on the interventional responses to increased
perioperative nutritional demands. While there are no current guidelines for the specific
nutritional management of similar patients, surgeons should continue working closely with
dieticians to optimize these patients’ nutrition during and after the hospital stay.
Acknowledgments
Authors: Daisy L. Spoer, MS1,2; Stephanie E. Shin, MS1; Kevin G. Kim, MD3; Zoë K.
Haffner, BS1; Kirsten S. Linnartz, MS1; Christopher E. Attinger, MD2; and Karen K. Evans,
MD2
Affiliations: 1Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC; 2Department
of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital,
Washington, DC; 3Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Health,
New York, NY.
Disclosure: The authors disclose no financial or other conflicts of interest.
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
8/9
3/17/23, 8:06 AM
Perioperative Evaluation of Nutritional Status to Predict Complications in Patients with Major Lower Extremity Amputation
Correspondence: Karen K. Evans, MD, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Plastic
and Reconstructive Surgery, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007;
Prsgeorgetownresearch@gmail.com
How Do I Cite This?
Spoer DL, Shin SE, Kim KG, et al. Perioperative evaluation of nutritional status to predict
complications in patients with major lower extremity amputation. Wounds. 2023;35(3):5965. doi:10.25270/wnds/22070
© 2023 HMP Global. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/original-research/perioperative-evaluation-nutritional-status-predict-complications
9/9