Proving Triangles Congruent Triangle Congruency Short-Cuts If you can prove one of the following short cuts, you have two congruent triangles 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. SSS (side-side-side) SAS (side-angle-side) ASA (angle-side-angle) AAS (angle-angle-side) HL (hypotenuse-leg) right triangles only! Built – In Information in Triangles Identify the ‘built-in’ part Shared side SSS Parallel lines -> AIA Vertical angles SAS Shared side SAS SOME REASONS For Indirect Information • • • • • • • Def of midpoint Def of a bisector Vert angles are congruent Def of perpendicular bisector Reflexive property (shared side) Parallel lines ….. alt int angles Property of Perpendicular Lines This is called a common side. It is a side for both triangles. We’ll use the reflexive property. HL ( hypotenuse leg ) is used only with right triangles, BUT, not all right triangles. HL ASA Name That Postulate (when possible) Reflexive Property SAS Vertical Angles SAS Vertical Angles SAS Reflexive Property SSA Let’s Practice Indicate the additional information needed to enable us to apply the specified congruence postulate. For ASA: B D For SAS: AC FE For AAS: A F Determine if whether each pair of triangles is congruent by SSS, SAS, ASA, or AAS. If it is not possible to prove that they are congruent, write not possible. Ex 4 G K I H J ΔGIH ΔJIK by AAS Determine if whether each pair of triangles is congruent by SSS, SAS, ASA, or AAS. If it is not possible to prove that they are congruent, write not possible. Ex 5 B A C D E ΔABC ΔEDC by ASA Determine if whether each pair of triangles is congruent by SSS, SAS, ASA, or AAS. If it is not possible to prove that they are congruent, write not possible. Ex 6 E A C B D ΔACB ΔECD by SAS Determine if whether each pair of triangles is congruent by SSS, SAS, ASA, or AAS. If it is not possible to prove that they are congruent, write not possible. Ex 7 J M K L ΔJMK ΔLKM by SAS or ASA Determine if whether each pair of triangles is congruent by SSS, SAS, ASA, or AAS. If it is not possible to prove that they are congruent, write not possible. J T Ex 8 K L V Not possible U Problem #4 AAS A Given: A C BE BD Prove: ABE CBD C B E Statements D Reasons Given Vertical Angles Thm Given 4. ABE CBD AAS Postulate 37 Problem #5 AHL Given ABC, ADC right s, AB AD Prove: B 3. AC AC ABC ADC C Statements 1. ABC, ADC right s AB AD D Reasons Given Given Reflexive Property 4. ABC ADC HL Postulate 38 Congruence Proofs 1. Mark the Given. 2. Mark … Reflexive Sides or Angles / Vertical Angles Also: mark info implied by given info. 3. Choose a Method. (SSS , SAS, ASA) 4. List the Parts … in the order of the method. 5. Fill in the Reasons … why you marked the parts. 6. Is there more? 39 Given implies Congruent Parts midpoint parallel segment bisector segments angles segments angle bisector angles perpendicular angles 40 Example Problem Given: AC bisects BAD AB AD Prove: ABC ADC A B C D 41 Step 1: Mark the Given Given: AC bisects BAD AB AD Prove: ABC ADC … and what it implies A B C D 42 Step 2: Mark . Given: AC bisects BAD AB AD Prove: ABC ADC •Reflexive Sides .. •Vertical Angles A B C D … if they exist. 43 Step 3: Choose a Method Given: AC bisects BAD AB AD Prove: ABC ADC SSS SAS ASA AAS HL A B C D 44 Step 4: List the Parts Given: AC bisects BAD AB AD Prove: ABC ADC STATEMENTS S AB AD A S BAC DAC A B C D REASONS AC AC … in the order of the Method 45 Step 5: Fill in the Reasons Given: AC bisects BAD AB AD Prove: ABC ADC STATEMENTS A B C REASONS S AB AD Given A S BAC DAC Def. of Bisector Reflexive (prop.) AC AC D (Why did you mark those parts?) 46 Step 6: Is there more? Given: AC bisects BAD AB AD Prove: ABC ADC STATEMENTS S 1. AB AD 1. 2. AC bisects BAD 2. A 3. BAC DAC 3. 4. S 4. AC AC 5. ABC ADC 5. A B C D REASONS Given Given Def. of Bisector Reflexive (prop.) SAS (pos.) 47 Congruent Triangles Proofs 1. Mark the Given and what it implies. 2. Mark … Reflexive Sides / Vertical Angles 3. Choose a Method. (SSS , SAS, ASA) 4. List the Parts … in the order of the method. 5. Fill in the Reasons … why you marked the parts. 6. Is there more? 53 Using CPCTC in Proofs • According to the definition of congruence, if two triangles are congruent, their corresponding parts (sides and angles) are also congruent. • This means that two sides or angles that are not marked as congruent can be proven to be congruent if they are part of two congruent triangles. • This reasoning, when used to prove congruence, is abbreviated CPCTC, which stands for Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent. 54 Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles • For example, can you prove that sides AD and BC are congruent in the figure at right? • The sides will be congruent if triangle ADM is congruent to triangle BCM. – Angles A and B are congruent because they are marked. – Sides MA and MB are congruent because they are marked. – Angles 1 and 2 are congruent because they are vertical angles. – So triangle ADM is congruent to triangle BCM by ASA. • This means sides AD and BC are congruent by CPCTC. 55 Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles • A two column proof that sides AD and BC are congruent in the figure at right is shown below: Statement Reason MA @ MB Given ÐA @ ÐB Given Ð1 @ Ð2 DADM @ DBCM Vertical angles AD @ BC CPCTC ASA 56 Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles • A two column proof that sides AD and BC are congruent in the figure at right isReason shown below: Statement MA @ MB Given ÐA @ ÐB Given Ð1 @ Ð2 DADM @ DBCM Vertical angles AD @ BC CPCTC ASA 57 Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles • Sometimes it is necessary to add an auxiliary line in order to complete a proof Statement Reason • For example, to prove ÐR @ ÐO in @ FO Given thisFRpicture RU @ OU Given UF @ UF reflexive prop. DFRU @ DFOU SSS ÐR @ ÐO CPCTC 58 Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles • Sometimes it is necessary to add an auxiliary line in order to complete a proof Statement Reason • For example, to prove ÐR @ ÐO in @ FO Given thisFRpicture RU @ OU Given UF @ UF Same segment DFRU @ DFOU SSS ÐR @ ÐO CPCTC 59