INTELECTUAL PROPERTY DEFINED Intangible assets resulting from the creative work of an individual or organization. Creations of the mind, such as: o Inventions o Literary and artistic works; o Symbols, names, images and designs used in commerce. If any person possessing ordinary skill in the art was able to draw the inferences and he constructs that the supposed inventor drew from prior art, then the latter did not really invent it Person skilled in the art-Ordinary practitioner (fictional person) a. Has access and understanding of all the prior art The legal rights which result from intellectual activities in the industrial, scientific, literary and artistic fields. PATENTS b. Aware of common general knowledge in the specific art c. Observes developments in the related technical field - Could be a team; need not have inventive ability CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS “The state shall protect and secure the exclusive rights of scientists, inventors, artists, and other gifted citizens to their intellectual property and creations, particularly when beneficial to the people, for such period as may be provided by law.” BASIC PATENT PRINCIPLES 1. TERRITORIALITY – Patents are only valid in the country or region in which they have been granted 2. FIRST-TO-FILE – applicant who files first will get the patent 3. DISCLOSURE – applicant shall disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete Quid pro quo Principle – protection in exchange for disclosure CONDITIONAL – patents are granted only upon compliance with the criteria of patentability DOCTRINE OF EXHAUSTION Also known as the, DOCTRINE OF FIRST SALE It provides that the patent holder has control of the first sale of his invention He has the opportunity to receive the full consideration for his invention from his sale. Hence, he exhausts his rights in the future control of his invention. A patent may be INFRINGED either: 1. Literally, or 2. By equivalents 4. 5. LITERAL INFRINGEMENT Literal infringement exists if an accused device falls directly within the scope of properly interpreted claims. LIMITED RIGHTS DOCTRINE OF EQUIVALENTS How much from a prior art is SUFFICIENT? An infringement also occurs when a device appropriates a prior invention by incorporating its innovative concept and despite some modification and change, performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to achieve substantially the same result. Function → means → and → result test “The defense of lack of novelty (i.e. anticipation) can only be established by a single prior art reference which discloses each and every element of the claimed invention. RULE: When a work has already been made available to the public, it shall be on non-patentable for absence of novelty. XPN: DOCTRINE OF NON-PREJUDICIAL DISCLOSURE The disclosure of information contained in the application during the 12-month period before the filing date or the priority date of the application if such disclosure was made by” 1. The inventor 2. A patent office and the information was contained 3. a. In another application filed by the inventor and should have not have been disclosed by the office, or b. In an application filed without the knowledge or consent of the inventor by a third party which obtained the information directly or indirectly from the inventor; A third party who obtained the information directly or indirectly from the inventor (IPC. Sec. 25) TEST OF NON-OBVIOUSNESS REMEDIES OF THE OWNERS AGAINST INFRINGERS OF THE PATENT Civil action for infringement - The owner may bring a civil action with the appropriate Regional Trial Court to recover from infringer the damages sustained by the former, plus attorney’s fees and other litigation expenses, and to secure an injunction for the protection of his rights. If the damages are inadequate or cannot be reasonably ascertained with reasonable certainty, the court may award by way of damages a sum equivalent to reasonable royalty. No damages can be recovered for acts of infringement committed more than four (4) years before the filing of the action for infringement. Criminal action for infringement – If the infringement is repeated; The criminal action shall suffer imprisonment of not less than six (6) months but not more than three (3) years and/or a fine not less than P100,000.00 but not more than P300,000.00 The criminal action prescribes in three (3) years from the commission of the crime Administrative remedy – Where the amount of damages claimed is not less than ₱200,000.00. The patentee may choose to file an administrative action against the infringer with the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA). Unlike regular courts, the BLA may not issue search and seizure warrants or warrants of arrest. Destruction of Infringing material – Upon court order DEFENSES IN ACTION FOR INFRINGMENT 1. 2. 3. Invalidity of the patent; Any of the grounds for cancellation of patents; a. That what is claimed as the invention is not new or patentable b. That the patent does not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and complete for it to be carried out by any person skilled in the art; or c. The patent is contrary to public order and morality Prescription REQUIREMENT for a mark to be REGISTERED A visible sign, and Capable of distinguishing one’s goods and services from another Immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matters Matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, etc. Contrary to public order or morality Flags or Coat of Arms of nations Names, portraits, or signature of living persons XPN: With consent Names, portraits, or signature of a deceased President of the Philippines. XPN: With written consent of his/her living widow Identical with a registered mark belonging to a different proprietor or a mark with an earlier filing or priority date, in respect of: a. The same goods or services, or b. Closely related goods or services, or c. If it nearly resembles such a mark as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion DURATION OR REGISTRATION EFFECTIVITY OF TRADEMARK 10 YEARS, subject to indefinite renewals of 10 years each. The registrant is required to file a declaration of actual use and evidence to that effect, or show valid reasons based on the existence of obstacles to such use, within one (1) year from the fifth (5th) anniversary of the date of the registration of the mark. Otherwise, the mark shall be removed from the Register by the IPO. VISIBLE SIGN Words , Letters, Numerals , Figures/Pictures, Shapes, Colors , Logos , Three-dimensional objects, Combinations INFRINGEMENT OF TRADEMARK Unauthorized use of a trademark. Fraudulent intent is unnecessary GR: Prior Registration of the trademark is a prerequisite to the action. NOT VISIBLE Scents Sounds DISTINCTIVENESS OF A MARK 1. FANCIFUL TRADEMARKS – made-up words which are invented to be used as a trademark name. 2. ARBITRARY TRADEMARKS – words that have a real, common meaning but they are completely unrelated to the product or service. 3. SUGGESTIVE TRADEMARK – characteristic of the product or service 4. DESCRIPTIVE TRADEMARK – description of the product or service 5. GENERIC TRADEMARKS – cannot be protected as they are simply a generic description of the product or service. names after XPN: Well-known marks COLORABLE IMITATION Such a close or ingenious imitation as to be calculated to deceive ordinary purchasers, or such resemblance of the infringing mark to the original as to deceive an ordinary purchaser giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives and to cause him to purchase the one supposing it to be the other Ex. Nike vs. Hike a LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION TYPES of confusion: Confusion of GOODS – as the goods themselves Confusion of BUSINESS – as to the source or origin of such goods MARKS which may be REGISTERED Any word, name, symbol, emblem, device, figure, sign, phrase, or any combination thereof. Except those enumerated under Section 123, IPC TRADEMARK Identifies or distinguishes the goods or services TRADE NAME Identifies or distinguishes the business or enterprise Registration is required Registration required is not - TEST OF CONFUSION NON- REGISTRABLE MARKS (Sec. 123.) Wherein the goods of the parties are different but the defendant’s product can reasonably be assumed to originate from the plaintiff thereby deceiving the public into believing that there is some connection between the plaintiff and defendant, which in fact, does not exist. DOMINANCY TEST – focuses on the prevalent features of the competing marks Ex. PAPA KETSARAP vs. PAPA BOY Lechon Sauce TOTALITY TEST – determined on the basis of visual, aural, connotative comparisons and, overall impressions endangered by the marks in controversy as they are encountered in the marketplace. Ex. Lee vs. Stylistic Mr. Lee OTHER FACTORS RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHTABLE OWNERS PRESUMPTION OF AUTHORSHIP The natural person whose name is indicated on a work in the usual manner as the author shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, presumed to be the author of the work. This is applicable even if the name is a pseudonym, where the pseudonym leaves no doubt as to identity of the author IDEM SONANS RULE Aural effects of the words and letters contained in the mark are also considered in determining the issue of confusing similarity The person or body corporate, whose name appears on the audio-visual work in the usual manner shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be presumed to be the maker of said work RIGHTS OF COPYRIGHT OWNERS Two names are said to be "idem sonantes" if the attentive ear finds difficulty in distinguishing them when pronounced. 1. Similarity of sound is sufficient to rule that the two marks are confusingly similar when applied to merchandise of the same descriptive properties. Examples: “Pycogenol” Horphag) a. b. vs. c. “Dermaline” vs. “Dermalin” (Dermaline vs. Myra Pharmaceuticals) d. e. f. g. “Nanny” bs. “Nan” (Nestle vs. Dy Jr.) vs. “PCO-GENOL” (Prosource DOCTRINE OF SECONDARY MEANING This doctrine is to the effect that a word or phrase originally incapable of exclusive appropriation with reference to an article on the market, because geographically or otherwise descriptive, might nevertheless have been used so long and so exclusively by one producer with reference to his article that, in that trade and to that branch of the purchasing public, the word or phrase has come to mean that the article was his product. Ex. De la sale Montessori International of Malolos, Inc. vs. De La Salle Brothers Inc. 2. Administrative action - same as in patent infringement cases. If the amount of damages claimed is not less than P200,000.00, the registrant may choose to seek redress against the infringer by filing an administrative action against the infringer with the Bureau of Legal Affairs. Civil Action - filed with the Regional Trial Courts. The owner of the registered mark may ask the court to issue a preliminary injunction to quickly prevent infringer from causing damage to his business. Furthermore, the court will require infringer to pay damages to the owner of the mark provided defendant is shown to have had notice of the registration of the mark (which is presumed if a letter R within a circle is appended) and stop him permanently from using the mark. Criminal Action - the owner of the trademark may ask the court to issue a search warrant and in appropriate cases, remedies available shall also include the seizure, forfeiture and destruction of the infringing goods and of any materials and implements the predominant use of which has been in the commission of the offense. - 2 – 5 years imprisonment - ₱50,000 – ₱200,000 in fine Reproduction of the work or substantial portion thereof Carry-out derivative work (dramatization, translation, adaptation, abridgement, arrangement or other transformation of the work) First distribution of the original and each copy of the work by sale or other forms of transfer of ownership Rental right Public display Public performance Other communications to the public. DURATION of Economic Rights: G.N.: 50 YEARS - Copyright protection – Lifetime of the artist + 50 years after death. REMEDIES and JURISDICTION ECONOMIC RIGHTS – The right to carry out, authorize, or prevent the following acts: 3. MORAL RIGHTS – For reasons of professionalism and propriety, the author has the right: a. To require that the authorship of the works be attributed to him (attribution right) b. To make any alterations of his work prior to, or to withhold it from publication c. To preserve integrity of work, object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation; and d. To restrain the use of his name with respect to any work not of his own creation or in a distorted version of his work DURATION of Moral Rights: “During the lifetime of the author and in perpetuity after his death” - Paternity Right/Right of Attribution Coterminous with Economic Rights – - Alteration and Non-Publication Right; - Right to Perseveration of Integrity, and - Right against False Attribution DROIT DE SUITE or “art proceeds right” - is the artist’s resale right, which requires that a percentage of the resale price of an artistic work is paid to the author. The right is exercisable even after the author’s death, provided the work is still in copyright In every sale or lease of an original work of painting or sculpture or of the original manuscript of a writer or composer, subsequent to the first disposition thereof by the author, the author or his heirs shall have an inalienable right to participate in the gross proceeds of the sale or lease to the extent of five percent (5%) 3. 4. Destruction without any compensation all infringing copies 5. Moral and Exemplary damages (IPC, Sec. 216.1); or 6. Seizure and impounding of any article, which may serve as evidence in the court proceedings DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRADEMARK, AND PATENTS COPYRIGHT, Literary and artistic works which are original intellectual creations in the literary and artistic domain protected from the moment of their creation. Any visible sign capable of distinguishing the goods (trademark) or services (service mark) of an enterprise and shall include a stamped or marked container of goods format of television game show is not subject to a copyright. generic terms for goods or services characteristics of goods like quality or quantity customary sign in everyday language color itself method idea procedure principle operation system Registered intellectual rights The right granted to an inventor by a State, or by a regional office acting for several States, which allows the inventor to exclude anyone else from commercially exploiting his invention for a limited period Not required; Optional: The National Library or IPO Damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement Impounding during the pendency of the action sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales COPYRIGHT 2. 10 years and a. renewable b. upon expiration c. d. It depends on a. the type of b. work c. d. e. f. Injunction Bureau of Trademarks, Intellectual Property Office 1. TRADEMARK REMEDIES IN CASE OF COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT Need not be registered Note: The Intellectual Property Code does NOT expressly provide protection against trademark dilution. Plagiarism The use of another’s information, language, or writing, when done without proper acknowledgment of the original source of Trademark Dilution It is the lessening of the capacity of a famous mark to identify and distinguish goods or services, regardless of the presence or absence of (1) competition between the owner of the famous mark and other parties; or (2) likelihood of confusion, mistake or deception. Subject to the principles of equity, the owner of a famous mark is entitled to an injunction against another person’s commercial use in commerce of a mark or trade name, if such use begins after the mark has become famous and causes dilution of the distinctive quality of the mark Term protection Copyright Infringement It is the doing by any person, without the consent of the owner of the copyright, of anything the sole right to do which is conferred by statute on the owner of the copyright. The act of lifting from another’s book substantial portions of discussions and examples and the failure to acknowledge the same is an infringement of copyright. Office where registered c. Directly commits an infringement; Benefits from the infringing activity of another person who commits an infringement if the person benefiting has been given notice of the infringing activity and has the right and ability to control the activities of the other person; With knowledge of infringing activity, induces, causes or materially contributes to the infringing conduct of another BASIS a. b. Definition WHO ARE LIABLE FOR INFRINGEMENT? Technical solution of a problem in any field of human activity which is new (novel invention) and industrially applicable. Any visible sign capable of distinguishing the goods (trademark) or services (service mark) Literary and artistic of an enterprise must works be registered). Transfers to public domain Examples: Pride and Prejudice, The Lizzie Bennet Diaries scientific theories contrary to public order or morality aesthetic creations methods for treatment of human body plant varieties 20 years from a. filing date of b. application c. d. e. EXPIRATION OF COPYRIGHT Bureau of Patents, Intellectual Property Office Rights which are not covered under a Droit de suite a. Prints b. Etchings c. Engravings d. Works of applied art e. Similar works wherein the author primarily derives gain from the proceeds of reproductions PATENT