Uploaded by Ray Willaford

Comparison of theoretical and practical forward power requirements during CS114 calibration as per MIL STD 461E F

advertisement
2015 13th International Conference on Electromagnetic Interference and Compatibility (INCEMIC)
Comparison of Theoretical and Practical
Forward power requirements during CS114 calibration
as per MIL STD 461E/F
W. Bilal Khan
L. Sudhakar
ASTRA MICROWAVE PRODUCTS LTD.,
Plot No: 18 -21, Imarath Kancha, Hardware Park, Raviryala Village, Maheshwaram Mandal,
R.R District, AP 500 005, India Phone: 040 3061 8777, Fax: 040 3061 8748
Email: bilalkhan.w@astramwp.com
Abstract - Military EMC standard specifies the need of
CS114 - conducted susceptibility testing in the frequency
range of 10 kHz to 200 MHz using bulk cable injection
method. This requirement is applicable to all interconnecting
cables including power cables. The Equipment Under Test
(EUT) shall not exhibit any malfunction, degradation of
performance, or deviation from specified indications beyond
the tolerances indicated in the individual equipment
specifications, when subjected to an injection probe drive
level which has been pre-calibrated to the appropriate
current limit. This paper compares the theoretical and
practical required forward power to meet the current limit as
specified in MIL STD 461E/F standards. This paper points
out the required forward power depends duly on proper
selection of the Current Injection probes with their associated
insertion loss instead adapting for high wattage power
amplifiers.
has been found to be necessary to obtain consistency in test
results. Insertion loss is measured as shown in Fig 2. It is
the difference in dB of the power applied to the probe
installed in the calibration fixture and the power level
detected by the measurement receiver.
I. INTRODUCTION
Fig 1. Insertion loss characteristics of injection probes
The basic concept of Bulk Current Injection (BCI)
test is to simulate currents that will be developed on
platform cabling from electromagnetic fields generated by
antenna transmissions both on and off the platform. This
type of test is often considered as a bulk current test since
current is the parameter measured. However, it is important
to note that the test signal is inductively coupled and that
Faraday's law predicts an induced voltage in a circuit loop
with the resultant current flow and voltage distribution
dependent on the various impedances present.
ŽĂdžŝĂůůŽĂĚ
/ŶũĞĐƚŝŽŶ
WƌŽďĞ
^ŝŐŶĂů
'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌ
ĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶ
II. INSERTION LOSS MEASUREMENT FOR BCI PROBE
DĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚ
Fig 1 shows the Insertion loss characteristics of
injection probes as defined in MIL-STD-461E [1] and
MIL-STD-461F [2] standard. A control on insertion loss
&ŝdžƚƵƌĞ
ZĞĐĞŝǀĞƌ
Fig 2. Setup for Insertion Loss measurement
ϵϳϴͲϭͲϱϬϵϬͲϱϯϱϬͲϲͬϭϱͬΨϯϭ͘ϬϬΞϮϬϭϱ/
1
Authorized licensed use limited to: Blue Origin LLC. Downloaded on January 22,2023 at 05:24:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
III. CS114 ± BULK CURRENT INJECTION CALIBRATION
order to achieve the curve #5 limit current is measured and
plotted using the software. Fig 5 shows the theoretical and
actual required forward power comparison graph. The
difference between the two measurements is found to be
almost equal below 1MHz and 2 to 3W increase in power
level is observed above 1MHz in actual measurement.
The test limit current (dBμA) as shown in Fig 3 is
calibrated by recording the forward power required to meet
the limit current on a 50 ohm calibration fixture for each
frequency in a defined step size. The calibration fixture
with terminations is a 50 ohm transmission line. Since the
injection probe is around the center conductor within the
fixture, a signal is being induced in the loop formed by the
center conductor, the two 50 ohm loads, and the structure
of the fixture to which the 50 ohm loads are terminated.
Measurement of induced current levels is performed by
measuring a corresponding voltage across one of the 50
ohm loads. Since the 50 ohm loads are in series for the
induced signal, the total drive voltage is actually two times
that being measured [Criteria 1].
^ŝŐŶĂů
'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŽƌ
ŽĂdžŝĂů>ŽĂĚ
/ŶũĞĐƚŝŽŶ
ŵƉůŝĨŝĞƌ
WƌŽďĞ
ŝƌĞĐƚŝŽŶĂů
ŽƵƉůĞƌ
DĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚ
ĂůŝďƌĂƚŝŽŶ
&ŝdžƚƵƌĞ
ƚƚĞŶƵĂƚŽƌ
ZĞĐĞŝǀĞƌ
DĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚ
ZĞĐĞŝǀĞƌ
Fig 3. CS114 Current limit for curve #5
Fig 4. CS114 Calibration Setup
Table 1 illustrates the comparison between
theoretical and practical forward power requirements for
curve #5 severity level. The Freq. with respect to the limit
current is plotted from 10 kHz ± 200 MHz. The Injection
probe (Model. IP-DR250) and Calibration fixture (Model.
CJDR250) of PRANA was used. Column B gives the
Insertion loss measured as per the Fig 2. Column C denotes
the limit current in dBμA. The target level at the Receiver
input ± Column D is calculated by using the formula [dBm
= (dBμA + 20*log*50) ± 107] where 50 denotes the 50ohm
impedance of the calibration fixture. The required injection
power ± Column E is then calculated by compensating the
Insertion loss reading to the target level at the Receiver.
The obtained forward power level in dBm is converted to
watts as shown in Column F.
Fig 5. Required Forward Power Comparison Graph
The practical CS114 calibration measurement was
performed as per the Fig 4 using EMC32 EMS automation
software. The required forward power level in watts in
In many EMC laboratories, it is often advisable to use
the RF attenuator between the injection probe and amplifier
to protect the amplifier from VSWR and
2
Authorized licensed use limited to: Blue Origin LLC. Downloaded on January 22,2023 at 05:24:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Table 1 Comparison of Theoretical and Practical Forward Power Requirements
&ƌĞƋƵĞŶĐLJ
;D,njͿ
dLJƉŝĐĂů
/WƌŽďĞ
/ŶƐĞƌƚŝŽŶ>ŽƐƐ
;ĚͿ
>ŝŵŝƚƵƌƌĞŶƚ
ƵƌǀĞηϱ
;ĚђͿ
dĂƌŐĞƚ>ĞǀĞů
ĂƚZĞĐĞŝǀĞƌ
ŝŶƉƵƚ;ĚŵͿ
dLJƉŝĐĂů
ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ
&ŽƌǁĂƌĚ
WŽǁĞƌ;ĚŵͿ
dLJƉŝĐĂů
ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ&ŽƌǁĂƌĚ
WŽǁĞƌ;tͿ
ǁŝƚŚϬĚƉĂĚ
&
ĐƚƵĂů
ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ&ŽƌǁĂƌĚ
WŽǁĞƌ;tͿ
ǁŝƚŚϬĚƉĂĚ
'
ĐƚƵĂů
ZĞƋƵŝƌĞĚ&ŽƌǁĂƌĚ
WŽǁĞƌ;tͿ
ǁŝƚŚϯĚƉĂĚ
,
Ϭ͘Ϭϭ
Ϭ͘ϬϮ
Ϭ͘Ϭϯ
Ϭ͘Ϭϰ
Ϭ͘Ϭϱ
Ϭ͘Ϭϲ
Ϭ͘Ϭϳ
Ϭ͘Ϭϴ
Ϭ͘Ϭϵ
Ϭ͘ϭ
Ϭ͘Ϯ
Ϭ͘ϯ
Ϭ͘ϰ
Ϭ͘ϱ
ϭ
ϱ
ϭϬ
ϮϬ
ϯϬ
ϰϬ
ϱϬ
ϲϬ
ϳϬ
ϴϬ
ϵϬ
ϭϬϬ
ϭϭϬ
ϭϮϬ
ϭϯϬ
ϭϰϬ
ϭϱϬ
ϭϲϬ
ϭϳϬ
ϭϴϬ
ϭϵϬ
ϮϬϬ
ϯϭ͘ϲ
Ϯϳ͘ϲ
Ϯϰ͘ϭ
Ϯϭ͘ϲ
ϭϵ͘ϳ
ϭϴ͘ϭ
ϭϲ͘ϵ
ϭϱ͘ϵ
ϭϱ
ϭϰ͘Ϯ
ϵ͘ϳ
ϳ͘Ϯϵ
ϱ͘Ϯ
ϯ͘ϳϮ
ϲ͘Ϭϵ
ϰ͘ϲϲ
ϯ͘ϲϱ
Ϯ͘ϴϰ
Ϯ͘ϯϰϱ
Ϯ͘ϭϱ
Ϯ͘ϬϮ
ϭ͘ϵϴ
Ϯ͘ϭ
Ϯ͘ϯϯ
Ϯ͘ϳϭ
ϯ
ϯ͘Ϭϰ
Ϯ͘ϵϵ
Ϯ͘ϴϰ
Ϯ͘ϴϭ
ϯ͘Ϭϰ
ϯ͘ϱϴ
ϰ͘ϯϵ
ϱ͘Ϭϳ
ϱ͘ϰϯ
ϱ͘ϰϱ
ϲϵ͘Ϯ
ϳϱ͘ϯ
ϳϴ͘ϵ
ϴϬ͘ϵ
ϴϯ͘ϭ
ϴϱ͘ϭ
ϴϲ͘ϭ
ϴϳ͘ϯ
ϴϴ͘ϭ
ϴϴ͘ϵ
ϵϱ͘Ϭ
ϵϴ͘ϵ
ϭϬϭ͘Ϯ
ϭϬϯ͘ϭ
ϭϬϵ͘Ϯ
ϭϬϵ͘ϰ
ϭϬϵ͘Ϭ
ϭϬϵ͘ϯ
ϭϬϵ͘ϭ
ϭϬϴ͘Ϯ
ϭϬϳ͘Ϭ
ϭϬϲ͘ϯ
ϭϬϱ͘ϳ
ϭϬϱ͘ϭ
ϭϬϰ͘ϱ
ϭϬϰ͘ϯ
ϭϬϯ͘ϱ
ϭϬϯ͘Ϯ
ϭϬϯ͘ϭ
ϭϬϮ͘ϲ
ϭϬϮ͘ϲ
ϭϬϮ͘ϭ
ϭϬϭ͘ϵ
ϭϬϭ͘ϱ
ϭϬϭ͘ϰ
ϭϬϭ͘ϭ
Ͳϯ͘ϴ
Ϯ͘ϯ
ϱ͘ϵ
ϳ͘ϵ
ϭϬ͘ϭ
ϭϮ͘ϭ
ϭϯ͘ϭ
ϭϰ͘ϯ
ϭϱ͘ϭ
ϭϱ͘ϵ
ϮϮ͘Ϭ
Ϯϱ͘ϵ
Ϯϴ͘Ϯ
ϯϬ͘ϭ
ϯϲ͘Ϯ
ϯϲ͘ϰ
ϯϲ͘Ϭ
ϯϲ͘ϯ
ϯϲ͘ϭ
ϯϱ͘Ϯ
ϯϰ͘Ϭ
ϯϯ͘ϯ
ϯϮ͘ϳ
ϯϮ͘ϭ
ϯϭ͘ϱ
ϯϭ͘ϯ
ϯϬ͘ϱ
ϯϬ͘Ϯ
ϯϬ͘ϭ
Ϯϵ͘ϲ
Ϯϵ͘ϲ
Ϯϵ͘ϭ
Ϯϴ͘ϵ
Ϯϴ͘ϱ
Ϯϴ͘ϰ
Ϯϴ͘ϭ
Ϯϳ͘ϴ
Ϯϵ͘ϵ
ϯϬ͘Ϭ
Ϯϵ͘ϱ
Ϯϵ͘ϴ
ϯϬ͘Ϯ
ϯϬ͘Ϭ
ϯϬ͘Ϯ
ϯϬ͘ϭ
ϯϬ͘ϭ
ϯϭ͘ϳ
ϯϯ͘Ϯ
ϯϯ͘ϰ
ϯϯ͘ϴ
ϰϮ͘ϯ
ϰϭ͘Ϭ
ϯϵ͘ϲ
ϯϵ͘ϭ
ϯϴ͘ϰ
ϯϳ͘ϯ
ϯϲ͘Ϭ
ϯϱ͘ϯ
ϯϰ͘ϴ
ϯϰ͘ϰ
ϯϰ͘Ϯ
ϯϰ͘ϯ
ϯϯ͘ϱ
ϯϯ͘Ϯ
ϯϮ͘ϵ
ϯϮ͘ϰ
ϯϮ͘ϲ
ϯϮ͘ϳ
ϯϯ͘ϯ
ϯϯ͘ϱ
ϯϯ͘ϴ
ϯϯ͘ϱ
Ϭ͘ϲ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
Ϭ͘ϵ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘ϱ
Ϯ͘ϭ
Ϯ͘Ϯ
Ϯ͘ϰ
ϭϲ͘ϵ
ϭϮ͘ϳ
ϵ͘Ϯ
ϴ͘Ϯ
ϳ͘Ϭ
ϱ͘ϰ
ϰ͘Ϭ
ϯ͘ϰ
ϯ͘Ϭ
Ϯ͘ϴ
Ϯ͘ϲ
Ϯ͘ϳ
Ϯ͘Ϯ
Ϯ͘ϭ
Ϯ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘ϳ
ϭ͘ϴ
ϭ͘ϴ
Ϯ͘ϭ
Ϯ͘ϯ
Ϯ͘ϰ
Ϯ͘ϯ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘ϭ
ϭ͘ϭ
ϭ͘ϱ
Ϯ͘Ϯ
Ϯ͘ϱ
ϯ͘ϱ
Ϯϭ͘ϭ
ϭϱ͘ϲ
ϭϯ͘ϲ
ϭϯ͘ϭ
ϭϯ͘ϭ
ϵ͘ϱ
ϳ͘ϲ
ϲ͘ϰ
ϱ͘ϲ
ϱ͘ϭ
ϰ͘ϴ
ϰ͘ϰ
ϰ͘Ϭ
ϯ͘ϵ
ϯ͘ϵ
ϰ͘Ϭ
ϯ͘ϴ
ϰ͘Ϭ
ϰ͘ϭ
ϰ͘ϭ
ϯ͘ϵ
ϯ͘ϵ
ϭ͘Ϯ
ϭ͘ϵ
Ϯ͘Ϭ
ϭ͘ϴ
ϭ͘ϵ
Ϯ͘ϭ
Ϯ͘Ϭ
Ϯ͘ϭ
Ϯ͘Ϭ
Ϯ͘Ϭ
Ϯ͘ϵ
ϰ͘ϰ
ϱ͘ϳ
ϳ͘ϱ
ϰϰ͘ϱ
ϯϳ͘Ϭ
ϯϬ͘ϴ
Ϯϵ͘ϰ
Ϯϳ͘ϰ
ϮϮ͘ϯ
ϭϲ͘ϭ
ϭϯ͘ϳ
ϭϮ͘ϱ
ϭϬ͘ϳ
ϵ͘ϱ
ϵ͘ϭ
ϴ͘ϭ
ϳ͘ϵ
ϴ͘ϭ
ϳ͘ϱ
ϳ͘ϵ
ϳ͘ϳ
ϳ͘ϳ
ϳ͘Ϯ
ϳ͘Ϭ
ϲ͘ϳ
3
Authorized licensed use limited to: Blue Origin LLC. Downloaded on January 22,2023 at 05:24:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
L. Sudhakar received his Master Degree in Applied
Electronics from Osmania University, Hyderabad. He
joined STQC Directorate in 1987 and worked for 20
years involved in evaluation of commercial and telecom
products as per International standards to comply with
EMI/EMC and Safety requirements. He has conducted
training programs in EMI/EMC Measurement and Design
techniques to various industries. He has taken training in
various international organizations like M/s Rohde and
Schwarz, Germany, Siemens Plessey U.K. He is a Lead
Auditor of ISO 9000/ISO 27000 Quality management
systems. He has worked with TUV Rheinland, Japan for
about 4 years in handling CE marking projects. Presently,
working as Head, EMI/EMC lab in Astra Microwave
Products Ltd, Hyderabad.
Email: sudhakar.l@astramwp.com
reverse power issues although it is not specified by the
standard. By considering this factor, measurement was
repeated using the 3dB, 100W attenuator. It is
observed that the maximum forward power recorded
with the addition of 3dB attenuator to achieve Curve
#5 current is 44.5W at 1 MHz. CS114 testing is
performed on the EUT while maintaining the
calibrated forward power level as determined above or
the maximum current level for the applicable limit,
whichever is less stringent. Therefore in either case,
pre-calibrated forward power is not exceeded.
IV CONCLUSION
Based on the comparison of theoretical and
actual CS114 BCI calibration measurement it is observed
that the required forward power level to generate the
maximum current limit level (Curve #5) does not exceed
44.5W with 3dB pad. By applying [Criteria 1], the power
required is 44.5*2 W which implicates RF amplifier of
100W is adequate for CS114 Calibration and Testing in
the frequency range of 10 kHz to 200 MHz. It is
therefore suggested to understand the importance of
injection probes insertion loss characteristics as specified
by the standard rather than preferring the high wattage
amplifier.
REFERENCES
[1] MIL-STD-(³'HSDUWPHQWRI Defense Interface Standard,
Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic
,QWHUIHUHQFH &KDUDFWHULVWLFV RI 6XEV\VWHPV DQG (TXLSPHQW´
20 August 1999.
[2] MIL-STD-)³'HSDUWPHQWRI'HIHQVH,QWHUIDFH6WDQGDUG
Requirements for the Control of Electromagnetic
,QWHUIHUHQFH &KDUDFWHULVWLFV RI 6XEV\VWHPV DQG (TXLSPHQW´
10 December 2007.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to thank Director Technical and Director
Operations, AMPL for their encouragement towards
publishing this paper.
$87+25¶6%,2-DATA
W. Bilal Khan received his Diploma in Electronics and
communication from Central Polytechnic College,
Taramani and B.Tech from SRM University, Chennai.
He joined EMC division, SAMEER - CEM, Chennai and
was involved in evaluation of various electrical and
electronic equipment as per civilian, Military and
Automotive Standards from 2007-2012. Currently, he is
working with Astra Microwave Products ltd., in
EMI/EMC Testing of defense products. He has
participated in conducting EMI/EMC seminars as a
faculty member. He is a life member of the Society of
EMC Engineers (India).
Email: bilalkhan.w@astramwp.com
4
Authorized licensed use limited to: Blue Origin LLC. Downloaded on January 22,2023 at 05:24:19 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.
Download