MOON SHOTS FOR MANAGEMENT By Gary Hamel Summary In May 2008, a group of management professors and senior executives collaborated to create a management agenda for the next 100 years. Gary Hamel led the so-called renegade brigade, which comprised scholars such as C.K. Prahalad, Peter Senge, and Jeffrey Pfeffer; new-age intellectuals like James Surowiecki; and progressive CEOs like John Mackey of Whole Foods, Terri Kelly of W.L. Gore, and Tim Brown of IDEO. A set of similar convictions about the importance of management and a sense of urgency about reforming it for a new period drew them together. The initial job for the group was to create a list of issues that would focus the efforts of management innovators all over the world. As a result, Hamel (who founded the Management Lab, a research institution dedicated to management innovation) specifies 25 "moon shots"— ambitious targets that managers should strive towards in order to develop Management 2.0. The urgency of expanding management's obligations beyond simply earning shareholder wealth is at the top of the list. To do so, the field's philosophical roots must be rebuilt so that work serves a higher purpose, as well as the concepts of community and citizenship must be properly integrated into organizations. A number of challenges are aimed at reducing the damaging impacts of hierarchy. Others are looking for better ways to release creativity and profit on employees' interests. Others aim to break free from the constraints of standard management thought patterns. Not all of the moonshots are novel, but many address difficulties that plague enormous enterprises. Their mission is to inspire fresh solutions to long-standing challenges by making every firm as human as the individuals who work there. Overview "Modern" management, much of which dates back to the late nineteenth century, has achieved its peak of development. A group of professors and CEOs devised 25 ambitious challenges to put forth a road map for reinvention. Companies will be unable to function in tomorrow's turbulent world unless management innovators address these concerns. Creating a Management Innovation Agenda What aspect of huge businesses' management, structure, and leadership will jeopardize their capacity to prosper in the next decades? What changes in management ideas and practices will be required to establish firms that are genuinely fit for the future? These were the questions posed to 35 management researchers and practitioners who gathered in California for two days to discuss the future of management. The Management Lab organized the conference, which comprised a broad mix of seasoned academics, new-age management gurus, progressive CEOs, and venture investors. The discussions were lively and occasionally heated. Throughout it all, no one lost sight of the ultimate goal: to create a bold agenda that would inspire management's reinvention in the twenty-first century. We were aware, as we grappled with this assignment, that management specialists frequently suffer from ambition-deficit condition. What, we wondered, was management's equivalent to deciphering the human genome, developing an AIDS treatment, or halting global warming? Following the event, a subgroup compiled a master list of challenges from the conference materials. Our intention was not to reduce the list into a few of meta-challenges, but to give a reasonably complete catalog that reflected the many and often subtle perspectives of individuals who had participated. In the end, the purpose that brought us together was more significant than the conference itself: to give support, guidance, and a little air cover for management renegades worldwide. Management’s Grand Challenges Ensure that management's job serves a greater goal. Management, both in theory and practice, must focus on achieving noble, socially meaningful goals. Integrate the concepts of community and citizenship into management systems. Processes and procedures that reflect the interconnectedness of all stakeholder groups are required. Rebuild the intellectual basis of management. To create organizations that are more than just efficient, we will need to learn from subjects such as biology, political science, and religion. Remove formal hierarchy's diseases. Natural hierarchies have benefits because authority rises from the bottom and leaders arise rather than being appointed. Reduce your fear and improve your faith. Mistrust and fear are corrosive to creativity and engagement and must be eliminated from management systems of the future. Control mechanisms must be reinvented. To overcome the disciplineversus-freedom trade-off, control systems must foster control from inside rather than external restraints. Rethink what it means to be a leader. The idea of a leader as a heroic decision maker is unsustainable. Leaders must reinvent themselves as social-systems builders who foster creativity and cooperation. Increase and capitalize on diversity. We need to develop a management structure that values diversity. Reimagine strategy development as an emergent process. In a volatile environment, strategy must reflect biological principles such as variation, selection, and retention. Disassemble and deconstruct the organization. Large organizations must be disaggregated into smaller, more pliable components in order to become more adaptive and inventive. Reduce the attraction of the past dramatically. Existing management systems frequently unconsciously perpetuate the status quo. They must promote innovation and change in the future. Share the responsibility for establishing direction. To elicit commitment, responsibility for goal formulation must be dispersed through a process in which share of voice is determined by insight rather than power. Create comprehensive performance metrics. Existing performance measures must be redesigned because they place insufficient emphasis on the key human talents that drive success in the creative economy. Extend executive timetables and views. Alternatives to compensation and reward systems that encourage managers to forsake long-term goals for short-term advantages must be developed. Create an information democracy. Companies require information systems that enable every employee to operate in the best interests of the whole organization. Empower the rebels while disarming the reactionaries. Employees with emotional equity engaged in the future rather than the past must be given more authority by management systems. Increase the level of employee autonomy. Management systems must be modified to make grassroots initiatives and local experimentation more feasible. Make an internal marketplace for ideas, talent, and resources. Markets are better at allocating resources than hierarchies, and organizations' resource allocation strategies must reflect this fact. Decision-making should be depoliticized. Positional biases must be avoided in decision-making processes, which should draw on the collective expertise of the whole business and beyond. Improve the optimization of trade-offs. Management systems frequently impose either-or options. What is required are hybrid systems that optimize critical trade-offs quietly. Increase the scope of human imagination. A lot is known about what inspires human creativity. This understanding must be employed more effectively in the design of management systems. Create passionate communities. Management systems must promote the establishment of self-defining communities of passion in order to optimize employee engagement. Management must be retooled for an open world. Value-creating networks frequently transcend the borders of the organization, rendering traditional power-based management techniques ineffectual. New management tools are required for the construction and shaping of complex ecosystems. Humanize business terminology and practice. Management systems of the future must give equal weight to eternal human principles like beauty, justice, and community as they do to traditional aims like efficiency, advantage, and profit. Retrain the brains of managers. Deductive and analytical skills in managers must be supplemented with conceptual and systemsthinking abilities. Management: Beliefs Shared Beliefs: Selected management issue: 1. getting semiskilled employees to perform repetitive activities competently, diligently, and efficiently 2. coordinating those efforts in ways that enabled complex goods and services to be produced in large quantities 3. executives and experts must first admit that they’ve reached the limits of Management 1.0 4. They must face the fact that tomorrow’s business imperatives lie outside the performance envelope of today’s bureaucracy-infused management practices 5. they must cultivate, rather than repress, their dissatisfaction with the status quo. What’s needed is a little righteous indignation Equipping organizations to tackle the future would require a management revolution no less momentous than the one that spawned modern industry. Shared Beliefs: 1. getting semiskilled employees to perform repetitive activities competently, diligently, and efficiently 2. coordinating those efforts in ways that enabled complex goods and services to be produced in large quantities 3. executives and experts must first admit that they’ve reached the limits of Management 1.0 4. They must face the fact that tomorrow’s business imperatives lie outside the performance envelope of today’s bureaucracyinfused management practices 5. they must cultivate, rather than repress, their dissatisfaction with the status quo. What’s needed is a little righteous indignation Underlying Assumption 1. They experienced a lot of failures 2. They had to adjust since they are providing their services 3. In order to gain the trust, they have to be pure honest. 4. Being prepared is nothing without Courage 5. They have to be productive and observant