CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 114 – TREASON
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a Filipino citizen or an
alien residing in the Philippines.
2. That there is a war in which the Philippines is
involved.
3. That the offender either –
a. levies war against the government
b. adheres to the enemies, giving them aid or
comfort
*Treason – breach of allegiance to a
government by a person who owes allegiance
to it.
(the nature of the crime is the violation by a
subject of his allegiance to his sovereign)
*allegiance – the obligation of fidelity and
obedience which the individual owe to the
government under which they live or to their
sovereign, in return for the protection they
receive
*Two kinds of allegiance –
1. Permanent – allegiance is owed by the alien
to his own country
2. Temporary – allegiance to the country where
he resides
*treason cannot be committed in time of peace
(there must be war wherein the Philippines is
involved)
While there is peace, there are no traitors.
It is punished by the state as a measure of selfdefense and self-preservation.
*Modes or ways of committing treason –
1. by levying war against the government
2. by adhering to the enemies of the Philippines,
giving them aid or comfort.
*levies war requires the concurrence of two
things (1) that there be an actual assembling of
men (2) for the purpose of executing a
treasonable design by force.
*there must be an actual assembling of men –
the actual enlisting of men to serve against the
government does not amount to levying war,
because there is no actual assembling of men.
*in treason by levying war, it is not necessary
that there be a formal declaration of the
existence of a state of war.
*the levying of war must be with intent to
overthrow the government as such, not merely
to resist a particular statute or repel a particular
officer.
*the levying of war must be in collaboration
with a foreign enemy. (If not, the crime is
rebellion)
*adhering to enemy requirement in committing
treason – (1) adherence and (2) giving aid and
comfort to the enemy must concur together.
*adherence to enemy – means intent to betray
*aid and comfort – act which strengthens or
tends to strengthen the enemy in the conduct
of war against the traitors country and an act
which weakens or tends to weaken the power
of the traitors country to resist or to attack the
enemy.
*giving information to, or commanding
foodstuffs for, the enemy is evidence of both
adherence and aid or comfort.
*it is not the degree of success, but rather the
aim for which the act was perpetrated, that
determines the commission of treason.
*commandeering of women to satisfy the lust
of the enemy is not treason.
*no treason through negligence
*no complex crime of treason with murder,
physical injuries, etc. because they are inherent
in the crime of treason.
*ways of proving treason –
1
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
1. Testimony of two witnesses, at least, to the
same overt act
2. Confession of the accused in open court
*two witness rule – required to prove the overt
act of giving aid or comfort – not necessary to
prove adherence
Overt act – physical activity, that deed
that constitute the rendering of aid and
comfort
(requires that the accused be afforded a special
protection not required in other cases so as to
avoid a miscarriage of justice)
*adherence may be proved – (cause state of
mind of the offender)
-by one witness
-from the nature of the act
-from the circumstances surrounding the act
ARTICLE 115 – CONSPIRACY AND PROPOSAL
TO COMMIT TREASON
*Conspiracy to commit treason – when in time
of war, two or more person come to an
agreement to levy war against the government
or to adhere to the enemies and give aid or
comfort, and decide to commit it.
*proposal to commit treason – committed
when in time of war a person who has decided
to levy war against the government or to
adhere to the enemies and give them aid or
comfort, proposes its execution to some other
person or persons.
*General rule – conspiracy and proposal is not
punishable. *Exception – treason – the very
existence of the state is endangered.
*aggravating circumstances in treason –
-cruelty
-ignominy
(Evident premeditation is not aggravating in
treason; superior strength and treachery are
inherent)
*two-witness rule does not apply in conspiracy
or proposal to commit treason because it is a
separate and distinct offence from that of
treason.
*Defense of suspended allegiance and change
of sovereignty, not accepted because;
1. A citizen owes an absolute and permanent
allegiance to his government
2. Sovereignty of the government is not
transferred to the enemy by mere occupation
3. The subsistence of the sovereignty of the
legitimate government in a territory occupied
by the military forces of the enemy during war
is one of the rules of international law
4. What is suspended is the exercise of the
rights of sovereignty (Laurel vs. Misa)
*Elements:
1. That the offender must be owing allegiance
to the government, and not a foreigner.
2. That he has knowledge of any conspiracy to
commit treason against the government.
3. That he conceal or does not disclose to the
governor or fiscal of the province or the mayor
or fiscal of the city in which he resides.
*Defense of obedience to de facto government
is allowed (Go Kim Cham vs. Valdez)
*defense of duress or uncontrollable fear or
immediate death is allowed
ARTICLE 116 – MISPRISION OF TREASON
*116 do not apply when the crime of treason is
already committed by someone and accused
does not report its commission to the proper
authority.
*the offender in misprision of treason is
punished as accessory to treason – penalty is
two degrees lower than that of treason.
*the offender, however, a principal in the crime
of misprision of treason – Art. 20 does not apply
even if the offender is related to the persons in
2
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
conspiracy against the government – Art. 20
applies only to accessory.
c. That he discloses their contents to a
representative of a foreign nation.
*Art116 is an exception to the rule that mere
silence does not make a person criminally liable.
*other acts of espionage are punished by Com.
A t No.
…
ARTICLE 117 – ESPIONAGE
*to be liable to the first kind of espionage, the
offender must have the intention to obtain
information relative to the defense of the
Philippines.
(Not necessary that the information, etc.. is
obtained. It is sufficient that he has the purpose
to obtain any of them when he entered a
warship,
fort
or
naval
or
military
establishment.)
*Espionage – offense of gathering, transmitting,
or losing information respecting the national
defense with intent or reason to believe that
the information is to be used to the injury of the
Republic of the Philippines or to the advantage
of any foreign nation.
*Two ways of committing espionage under
article 117:
1. By entering, without authority therefor,
a warship, fort or naval or military
establishment or reservation to obtain
any information, plans, photographs, or
other data of a confidential nature
relative to the defense of the
Philippines.
Elements:
a. That the offender enters any places
mentioned therein.
b. That he has no authority therefor.
c. That his purpose is to obtain
information, plans, photo or other
data of a confidential nature
relative to the defense of the
Philippines.
2. By disclosing to the representatives of a
foreign nation the contents of the
articles, data or information referred to
in paragraph 1 of article 117, which he
had in his possession by reason of the
public office he holds.
Elements:
a. That the offender is a public officer.
b. That he has in his possession the
articles, data or information, by
reason of the public office he holds.
*Persons liable –
1st espionage – any person, whether a civilian or
a foreigner, a private individual or a public
officer.
2nd espionage – offender must be a public
officer who has in his possession the article,
data or information by reason of the public
office he holds.
*Espionage vs. Treason
- Espionage is a crime not conditioned by the
citizenship of the offender.
- Treason is committed only in time of war,
while espionage may be committed both in
time of peace and in time of war.
- Treason is limited in two ways of committing
the crime: levying war and adhering to the
enemy by giving aid or comfort to the enemy,
while espionage may be committed in many
ways (com act 616)
ARTICLE 118 – INCITING TO WAR OR GIVING
MOTIVES FOR REPRISALS
*Elements:
1. That the offender performs unlawful or
unauthorized act.
2. Such acts provoke or give occasion for a war
involving or liable to involve the Philippines or
expose Filipino citizens to reprisals on their
persons or property.
3
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
b. that the offender intended to aid the enemy
by giving such notice or information, the crime
amounts to treason; hence, the penalty is the
same as that for treason.
*Intention of the offender is immaterial
*committed in time of peace
ARTICLE 119 – VIOLATION OF NEUTRALITY
*Elements:
1. That there is a war in which the Philippines is
not involved.
2. That there is a regulation issued by
competent authority for the purpose of
enforcing neutrality.
3. That the offender violates such regulation.
*Neutrality – nation or power which takes no
part in a contest of arms going on between
others.
*violation of such regulation issued
competent authority constitutes the crime.
by
ARTICLE 120 – CORRESPONDENCE WITH
HOSTILE COUNTRY
*Elements:
1. That it is in time of war in which the
Philippines is involved.
2. That the offender makes correspondence
with an enemy country or territory occupied by
the enemy troops.
3. That the correspondence is either:
a. prohibited by the government
b. carried on in ciphers or conventional
signs.
c. containing notice or information
which might be useful to the enemy.
*Correspondence – communication by means
of letter; or it may refer to the letters which
pass between those who have friendly or
business relations.
*even if correspondence contains innocent
matters, if the correspondence has been
prohibited by the government, it is punishable.
*circumstances qualifying the offense –
a. that the notice or information might be
useful to the enemy.
ARTICLE 121 – FLIGHT TO ENEMY’S COUNTRY
*Elements:
1. That there is a war in which the Philippines is
involved.
2. That the offender must be owing allegiance
to the government.
3. That the offender attempts to flee or go to
the enemy country.
4. That going to the enemy country is punished
by competent authority.
*an alien resident maybe guilty of flight to
enemy country – the allegiance contemplated in
this article is either natural or temporary
allegiance.
*mere attempt to flee or go to enemy country
consummates the crime.
*must be prohibited by the government, for the
crime to be committed.
ARTICLE 122 – PIRACY IN GENERAL AND
MUTINY ON HIGH SEAS OR IN PHILIPPINE
WATERS
*Two ways or modes of committing piracy:
1. By attacking or seizing a vessel on the high
seas or in Philippine waters;
2. By seizing in the vessel while on high seas or
in the Philippine waters the whole or part of its
cargo, its equipment or personal belongings of
its competent or passengers.
*Elements of Piracy (RPC)
1. That a vessel is on the high seas or in the
Philippine waters;
2. That the offenders are not member of its
complement or passengers of the vessel;
3. That the offenders (a) attack or seize that
vessel, or (b) seize the whole or part of the
4
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
cargo of said vessel, its equipment or personal
belongings of its complement or passengers.
*high seas – parts of the seas that are not
included in the exclusive economic zone, in the
territorial seas, or in the internal waters of a
state, or in the archipelagic waters of an
archipelagic state.
*Piracy – it is robbery or forcible depredation
on the high seas, without lawful authority and
done with animo furandi, and in the spirit and
intention of universal hostility. ( People vs. Lollo, et al)
*Mutiny – unlawful resistance to a superior
officer, or the raising of commotions and
disturbances on board a ship against the
authority of its commander.
*Piracy vs. Mutiny
-In Piracy the person who attack a vessel
seize its cargo are stranger to said vessel.
- In Mutiny, they are members of the crew
passengers.
- In Piracy the intent to gain is essential
- In mutiny, the offenders may only intend
ig o e the ship’s offi e s o the
a
prompted by a desire to commit plunder.
or
or
to
e
*Piracy and Mutiny may be considered as
terrorism --- Thereby sowing and creating a
condition of widespread and extraordinary fear
and panic to give in to an unlawful demand shall
be guilty of crime of terrorism.
1. Whenever the offender have seized the
vessel by boarding or firing upon the same;
2. Whenever the pirates have abandoned their
victim without means of saving themselves; or
3. Whenever the crime is accompanied by
murder, homicide, physical injuries or rape.
*vessel – any vessel or watercraft used for
transport of passengers and cargo from one
place to another through Philippine waters. It
shall include all types of vessels or boats used in
fishing.
*any person who aids or protects pirates or
abets the commission of piracy shall be
considered as an accomplice.
ANTI-HIJACKING LAW
RA6235
*Sec. 1 – it shall be unlawful for any person to
compel a change in the course or destination of
an aircraft of Philippine registry, or to seize or
usurp the control thereof, while it is in flight.
(An aircraft is in flight from the moment all its
external
doors
are
closed
following
embarkation until any of such doors is opened
for disembarkation.)
*it shall be likewise be unlawful for any person
to compel an aircraft of foreign registry to land
in Philippine territory or to seize or usurp the
control thereof while it is within the said
territory.
HUMAN SECURITY ACT OF 2007
RA9372
*PIRACY UNDER PD 532
*Any attack upon or seizure of any vessel, or
the talking away of whole or part thereof or its
a go, e uip e t… o
itted
a pe so
including passenger or member of the
complement of said vessel, in Philippine waters.
ARTICLE 123 – QUALIFIED PIRACY
*Piracy or Mutiny is, therefore qualified if any
of the following circumstances is present:
*Acts punishable as terrorism
- Piracy and Mutiny
- Rebellion or Insurrection
- Coup d’ etat
- Murder
- Kidnapping and serious illegal detention
- Crimes involving destruction
(Thereby sowing and creating a condition of
widespread and extraordinary fear and panic
among the populace, in order to coerce the
5
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
government to give in to an unlawful demand
shall be guilty of the crime of terrorism.)
*The acquittal of the accused or the dismissal of
the case shall be a bar to another prosecution
for any offense or felony which is necessarily
included in the offense charged under this act.
ARTICLE 124 – ARBITRARY DETENTION
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he detains a person.
3. That the detention is without legal grounds.
*such public officers are: (those vested with the
power to detain.)
- Policemen, and other agents of the law
- Judges or Mayors
- Barangay captain and municipal councilors
*If detention is perpetrated by other public
officer, the crime committed may be illegal
detention, because they are acting in their
private capacity.
*Private individuals who conspired with public
officers in detaining are guilty of arbitrary
detention.
*Detention – actual confinement of person in
an enclosure, or in any manner detaining and
depriving him of his liberty.
*A person is detained when he is placed in
confinement or there is a restraint on his
person.
*Detention is without legal grounds:
1. When he has not committed any crime or, at
least there is no reasonable ground for
suspicion that he has committed a crime.
2. When he is not suffering from violent insanity
or any other ailment requiring compulsory
confinement in a hospital.
*Legal grounds for detention of any person:
1. Commission of a crime
2. Violent insanity or any ailment requiring the
compulsory confinement of the patient in a
hospital.
*A peace officer must have a warrant of arrest
properly issued by the court in order to justify
an arrest. If there is no warrant of arrest, the
arrest of a person by a public officer may
constitute arbitrary detention.
*Lawful warrantless arrest:
1. When, in his presence, the person to be
arrested has committed, is actually committing,
or is attempting to commit an offense.
2. When an offense has in fact just been
committed, and he has probable cause to
believe based on personal knowledge of facts
and circumstances that the person to be
arrested has committed it.
3. When the person to be arrested is a prisoner
who has escaped from a penal establishment.
*In his presence – sees the offense committed
or hears the disturbance created thereby.
*Personal knowledge – based upon probable
cause, an actual belief or reasonable grounds of
suspicion.
*Probable cause – facts and circumstances
which could lead a reasonable discreet and
prudent man to believe that an offense has
been committed and that the object sought in
connection with the offense are in the place
sought to be searched.
(It must be within the personal knowledge of
the complainant or the witnesses he may
produce and not based on mere hearsay.)
*Arbitrary detention may be committed thru
imprudence
*Periods of detention penalized –
-not exceed 3 days – AM in max to PC min
-more than 3 days but not more than 15 days –
PC med to max
-more than 15 days but not more than 6
months – PMayor
6
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
-if detention exceeded 6 months – RT
RA 9745 ANTI-TORTURE ACT OF 2009
*if the detention of a person is not for some
legal ground, it will be a case under article 124
not 125.
*Torture – an act by which severe pain or
suffering whether physical or mental is
intentionally afflicted with purposes:
1. Getting information or confession
2. Punishment for an act
3. Intimidation or coercion for any reason based
on discrimination
*Art. 125 applies only when the arrest is made
without warrant of arrest. But the arrest must
be lawful.
*if with warrant of arrest, the person arrested
can be detained indefinitely until his case is
decided by the court or he posts a bail for
temporary release.
*Persons liable:
- Torturer
- Cooperated
- Any superior who ordered
- Immediate commanding officer of the unit
*What constitutes a violation of article 125 is
the failure to deliver the person arrested to the
proper judicial authority within the period
specified therein.
*Punishable acts of torture:
1. Physical – form of treatment or punishment
inflicted by a person in authority upon a person.
2. Mental – affects or confuse the mind and/or
u de i e the pe so ’s dig it .
ARTICLE 125 – DELAY IN THE DELIVERY OF
DETAINED PERSONS TO THE PROPER JUDICIAL
AUTHORITIES.
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he has detained a person for some legal
grounds.
3. That he fails to deliver such person to the
proper judicial authorities within:
a. 12 hours – when offense is
punishable by light penalties.
b. 18 hours – when offense is
punishable by correctional penalties.
c. 36 hours – when offense is
punishable by afflictive or capital penalties.
(OR THEIR EQUIVALENT)
*if the offender is a private person, the crime is
illegal detention.
*Duty of detaining officer is deemed complied
with upon the filing of the complainant with the
judicial authority.
*Proper judicial authorities – courts of justice or
judges of said court with judicial power to order
the temporary detention of an accused.
*Detained person should be released when a
judge is not available – up to maximum hours of
detention.
*Waiver of article 125 – asks for preliminary
investigation and must sign a waiver in front of
his counsel.
*Violation of article 125 does not affect the
legality of confinement under process issued by
a court.
ARTICLE 126 – DELAYING RELEASE
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That there is a judicial order or executive
order for the release of the prisoner or detainee
or that there is a proceeding upon a petition for
the liberation of such person.
3. That the offender without good reason
delays:
7
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
a. Service of the notice of such order to
the prisoner.
b. The performance of such judicial or
executive order for the release of the prisoner.
b. The proceedings upon a petition for
the release of such person.
dwelling is having unlawful possession of
drug/opium.
*When a peace officer secured the previous
consent of the owner of the house to the search
without warrant they are not liable – impliedly
waived.
ARTICLE 127 – EXPULSION
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he expels any person from the
Philippines, or compels a person to change his
residence.
3. That the offender is not authorized to do so
by law.
*Acts punishable under article 127:
1. Expelling a person from the Philippines.
2. Compelling a person to change his residence.
*Only courts by a final judgment can order a
person to change his residence.
ARTICLE 128 – VIOLATION OF DOMICILE
*Acts punishable:
1. By entering any dwelling against the will of
the owner thereof.
2. By searching papers or other effects found
without the previous consent of such owner.
3. By refusing to leave the premises, after
having surreptitiously entered said dwelling and
after having been required to leave the same.
*If the offender who enters the dwelling against
the will of the owner thereof is a private
individual, the crime committed is trespass to
dwelling.
*Authorized only when there is a valid search
warrant.
*A peace officer without search warrant cannot
lawfully enter the dwelling against the will of
the owner, even if he knew that someone in the
*Requisites for issuing search warrant:
1. Issued upon probable cause
2. Probable cause must be determined by the
judge himself
3. In determination, judge must examine under
oath or affirmation of the complainant and such
witness he produces
4. Warrant must particularly describe the place
to be searched or person and things to be
seized.
ARTICLE
129
–
SEARCH
WARRANT
MALICIOUSLY OBTAINED AND ABUSE IN THE
SERVICE OF THOSE LEGALLY OBTAINED.
*Acts punishable:
1. By procuring a search warrant without just
cause.
2. By exceeding his authority or by using
unnecessary severity in executing a search
warrant legally procured.
*Elements of procuring a search warrant
without just cause:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he procures a search warrant.
3. That there is no just cause.
*Personal property to be seized:
1. Subject of the offense
2. Stolen or embezzled and other proceeds or
fruits of the offense
3. Used or intended to be used as the means of
committing an offense.
*Search warrant shall not be issued except
upon probable cause in connection with one
specific offense to be determined personally by
the judge after examination under oath of the
o plai a t…
8
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Right to break door or window to effect search
– if refuse admittance to the place of directed
search after giving notice of his purpose and
authority.
*Search must be made in presence of two
witnesses.
4. That the owner or any members of his
family, or two witnesses residing in the
same locality are not present.
ARTICLE 131 – PROHIBITION, INTERRUPTION,
AND DISSOLUTION OF PEACEFUL MEETINGS.
*Acts punished:
*Validity of search warrant – 10 days from its
date.
*Evidence obtained in violation of these are not
admissible as evidence in court.
*Valid warrantless search:
1. Plain view search
2. Moving vehicle search
3. Sear
4. Waived or consented search
5. Customs search
6. Stop and frisk
7.
*Elements of exceeding authority or using
unnecessary severity in executing a search
warrant legally procured:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he has legally procured a search
warrant.
3. That he exceeds his authority or uses
unnecessary severity in exerting the
same.
*Search – to go over or look through for the
purpose of finding something to examine.
ARTICLE 130 – SEARCHING
WITHOUT WITNESSES
DOMICILE
1. Prohibiting or by interrupting, without
legal ground, the holding of a peaceful
meeting or by dissolving the same.
2. By hindering any person from joining
any lawful association or from
attending any of its meetings.
3. By prohibiting or hindering any person
from addressing, either alone or
together with others, any petition to
the authorities for the correction of
abuses or redress of grievance.
*Elements common to 3 acts:
1. The offender is public officer or employee.
2. That he performs any of the acts above.
*Only public officer or employee can commit
this crime. If committed by private individual,
the crime is disturbance of public order.
*To constitute violation of 1st paragraph.
1. The meeting must be peaceful.
2. There is no legal ground for prohibiting or
interrupting or dissolving that meeting.
*Right to peaceful meeting is not absolute –
may be regulated in order that it may not be
injurious to the equal enjoyment of others
having equal rights, nor injurious to the right of
the community or society.
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he is armed with search warrant
legally procured.
3. That he searches the domicile, paper or
other belonging of any person.
*When the meeting to be held is not peaceful,
there is legal ground for prohibiting it.
*The offender must be stranger, not a
participant in the peaceful meeting.
ARTICLE 132 – INTERRUPTION OF RELIGIOUS
WORSHIP
9
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That
religious
ceremonies
or
manifestation of any religion are about
to take place or are going on.
3. That the offender prevents or disturbs
the same.
ARTICLE 133 – OFFENDING THE RELIGIOUS
FEELINGS
*Elements:
1. That the act complained of were
performed:
a. In a place devoted to religious
worship, or
b. During the celebration of any
religious ceremony.
2. That the acts must be notoriously
offensive to the feelings of the faithful.
*Religious ceremonies – those religious acts
performed outside of a church, such as
procession and special prayers for burying dead
persons.
*Acts notoriously offensive to the feelings of
the faithful – acts must be directed against
religious practice or dogma or ritual for the
purpose of ridicule, as mocking or scoffing at or
attempting to damage an object of religious
veneration (People vs. Baes)
*There must be deliberate intent to hurt the
feelings of the faithful.
ARTICLE 134 – REBELLION OR INSURRECTION
a. To remove from the allegiance
to said government or its laws:
i. The territory of the
Philippines or any part
thereof; or
ii. Any body of land, naval
or other armed forces;
or
b. To deprive the chief executive
or congress, wholly or partially,
or any of their powers or
prerogatives.
*Rebellion
and
synonymous.
insurrection
are
not
*Rebellion – more frequently used where the
object of the movement is completely to
overthrow and supersede the existing
government.
*Insurrection – more commonly employed in
reference to a movement which seeks merely to
effect some change of minor importance, or to
prevent the exercise of governmental authority
with respect to particular matters or subjects.
*There must be a public uprising and the taking
up of arms.
*Actual clash of arms with the forces of the
government, not necessary to convict the
accused who is in conspiracy by others, actually
taking arms against the government.
*The purpose of uprising must be shown to be
convicted of rebellion.
*The crime of rebellion is complete the very
moment a group of rebels rise publicly and take
arms against the government.
*Elements:
1. That there be (a) public uprising and (b)
taking arms against the government.
2. That the purpose of the uprising or
movement is either –
*Rebellion vs. Treason
- The levying of war against the government
would constitute treason when performed to
aid the enemy.
10
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
- Levying of war against the government during
peace time for any purposes mentioned in
article 134 is Rebellion.
- Rebellion always involves taking up arms
against the government; treason may be
committed by mere adherence to the enemy by
giving them aid or comfort.
*Giving aid and comfort not criminal in
rebellion.
*No complex crime to rebellion – provided it is
for the furtherance of rebellion.
ARTICLE 134-A – COUP D’ ETAT
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a person or persons
belonging to the military or police or
holding
any
public
office
or
employment.
2. That it is committed by means of a swift
attack accompanied by violence,
intimidation, threat, strategy or stealth.
3. That the attack is directed against duly
constituted authorities of the Republic
of the Philippines, or any military camp
or
installation,
communication
networks, public utilities or other
facilities needed for the exercise and
continued possession of power.
4. That the purpose of the attack is to
seize or diminish state power.
ARTICLE 135 – PERSONS LIABLE FOR
REBELLION, INSURRECTION AND/OR COUP D’
ETAT
1. The leaders
a. Any person who (1) promotes
(2) maintains or (3) heads a
rebellion or insurrection; or
b. Any person who (1) leads (2)
direct or (3) commands others
to u de take a oup d’ etat.
2. The participants
a. Any
person
who
(1)
participates, or (2) executes the
commands of others in
rebellion or insurrection.
b. Any person in the government
service who:
i. Participates
ii. Executes directions or
command of others in
u de taki g a oup d’
etat;
c. Any person not in government
service who:
i. Participates
ii. Supports
iii. Finances
iv. Abets
v. Aids in undertaking a
oup d’ etat.
*Public officer must take active part, to be
liable; mere silence or omission not punishable
in rebellion.
*The leade of e ellio , i su e tio o oup d’
etat in case he is unknown – any person who in
fact directed the others, spoke for them, signed
receipts and other documents issued in their
name, or performed similar acts, on behalf of
the rebels shall be deemed a leader of such
rebellion, insurrection o oup d’ etat.
*It is not a defense in rebellion that the accused
never took the oath of allegiance to, or that
they never recognized the government. (US vs.
Del Rosario)
*No complex crime of rebellion with murder
and other common crimes.
- any or all of the acts described in article 135,
when committed as means to or in furtherance
of the subversive ends described in art 134,
becomes absorbed in the crime of rebellion and
cannot be regarded or penalized as distinct
crimes in themselves.
11
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 136 – CONSPIRACY AND PROPOSAL
TO COMMIT COUP D’ ETAT, REBELLION OR
INSURRECTION
*Elements:
*The crime of disloyalty of public officers
presupposes the existence of rebellion by other
persons.
1. That the offender rise (1) publicly and
(2) tumultuously.
2. That they employ force, intimidation, or
other means outside of legal methods.
3. That the offender employs any of those
means to attain any of the following
objects:
a. To prevent the promulgation or
execution of any law or the
holding of any popular election.
b. To prevent the national
government, or any provincial
or municipal government, or
any public officer thereof from
freely exercising its or his
functions or prevent the
execution of any administrative
order.
c. To inflict any act of hate or
revenge upon the person or
property of any public officer or
employee.
d. To commit, for any political or
social end, any person,
municipality or province, or the
National Government of all its
property or any part thereof.
*The offender under article 137 must not be in
conspiracy with the rebels.
*The ultimate object of sedition is violation of
the public peace.
ARTICLE 138 – INCITING TO REBELLION OR
INSURRECTION
*What distinguishes sedition from rebellion is
the object or purpose of the uprising – in
sedition, the purpose of the offender may be
political or social – in rebellion, it is always
political.
*Merely agreeing and deciding to rise publicly
and take arms against the government for the
purposes of rebellion or merely proposing the
commission of said acts is already subject to
punishment.
*No conspiracy when there is no agreement
and no decision to commit said acts.
ARTICLE 137 – DISLOYALTY OF PUBLIC OFFICER
OR EMPLOYEES
*Acts punished:
1. By failing to resist a rebellion by all
means in their power; or
2. By continuing to discharge the duties of
their offices under the control of the
rebels; or
3. By accepting appointment to office
under them.
*Elements:
1. That the offender does not take arms or
is not in open hostility against the
government.
2. That he incites others to the execution
of any of the acts of rebellion.
3. That the inciting is done by means of
speeches, proclamations tending to the
same end.
ARTICLE 139 – SEDITION
*Sedition cannot be committed by one person –
article 139 – the crime of sedition is committed
by persons who rise publicly and tumultuously
in order to attain by force, intimidation, or by
othe ea s outside of legal ethods…
*Tumultuous – the disturbance if caused by
more than 3 persons (4) who are armed or
provided with means of violence.
12
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*In sedition, the offender need not be private
individuals.
*Public uprising and an object of sedition must
together concur.
*Common crimes are not absorbed in sedition –
two separate crimes. (Except – unlicensed
firearms, it is absorbed in the crime of sedition
because of its element – tumultuous)
ARTICLE 140 – PENALTY FOR SEDITION
*Persons liable for sedition:
1. The leader of the sedition – PMayor - min and
fine not exceeding P10,000.
2. Other persons participating in the sedition –
PC – max and fine not exceeding P5,000.
ARTICLE 141 – CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT
SEDITION
*There must be an agreement and decision to
rise publicly and tumultuously to attain any of
the objects of sedition.
*There is no proposal to commit sedition – not
punished.
ARTICLE 142 – INCITING TO SEDITION
*Different acts of inciting to sedition:
1. Inciting others to the accomplishment
of any of the acts which constitute
sedition by means of speeches,
proclamations, writings, emblems, etc.
2. Uttering seditious words or speeches
which tend to disturb the public peace.
3. Writing, publishing, or circulating
scurrilous libels against the government
or any duly constituted authorities
thereof, which tend to disturb the
public peace.
*Elements:
1. That the offender does not take direct
part in the crime of sedition.
2. That he incites others to the
accomplishment of any of the acts
which constitute sedition.
3. That the inciting is done by means of
speeches, proclamations, writings,
emblem, cartoons, banners, or other
representations tending to the same
end.
*uttering seditious words or speeches and
writing, publishing or circulating scurrilous libels
are punishable when:
1. They tend to disturb or obstruct any lawful
officer in executing the functions of his office;
2. They tend to instigate others to cabal and
meet together for unlawful purposes;
3. They suggest or incite rebellious conspiracies
or riots.
4. They lead or tend to stir up the people
against the lawful authorities or to disturb the
peace of the community, the safety and order
of the government.
*It is not necessary, in order to be seditious,
that the words used should in fact result in a
rising of the people against the constituted
authorities.
(The law is not aimed merely at actual
disturbance as its purpose is also to punish
utterances which may endanger public order.)
*Two rules relative to seditious words:
a. The clear and present danger rule – the
words must be of such a nature that by
uttering them, there is a danger of a
public uprising and that such danger
should be both clear and imminent.
b. The dangerous tendency rule – when
the words uttered or published could
easily produce disaffection among the
people and a state of feeling in them
incompatible with a disposition to
remain loyal to the government and
obedient to the laws.
13
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 143 – ACTS TENDING TO PREVENT THE
MEETING OF THE ASSEMBLY AND SIMILAR
BODIES
*Elements:
1. That there be a projected or actual
meeting of the National Assembly or
any
of
its
committees
or
subcommittees,
constitutional
committees or division thereof, or of
any provincial board or city or municipal
council or board.
2. That the offender who may be any
person prevents such meeting by force
or fraud.
ARTICLE 144 – DISTURBANCE OF PROCEEDINGS
*Elements:
1. That there be a meeting of the National
Assembly or any of its committees or
subcommittees,
constitutional
commission or committees or division
thereof, or of any provincial board or
city or municipal council or board.
2. That the offender does any of the
following acts:
a. He disturbs any of such
meetings
b. He behaves while in the
presence of any of such bodies
in such a manner as to interrupt
its proceedings or to impair the
respect due to it.
*It must be a meeting of a legislative body or of
provincial board or city or municipal council or
board which is disturbed.
*One who disturbs the proceedings of the
National Assembly may also be punished for
contempt by the Assembly.
ARTICLE 145 – VIOLATION OF PARLIAMENTARY
IMMUNITY
*Acts punishable:
1. By using force, intimidation, threats, or
frauds to prevent any member of the
National Assembly from:
a. Attending the meetings of the
National Assembly or of any of
its
committees
or
subcommittees, constitutional
commission or committees or
divisions thereof.
b. From expressing his opinions.
c. Casting his votes.
2. By arresting or searching any member
thereof while the National Assembly is
in regular or special session, except in
case such member has committed a
crime punishable under the code by a
penalty of prision mayor or higher.
*Elements of 1st:
1. That the offender uses force,
intimidation, threats or fraud.
2. That the purpose of the offender is to
prevent any member of the National
Assembly from:
a. Attending the meetings of the
National Assembly or of any of
its
committees
or
subcommittees, constitutional
commission or committees or
division thereof.
b. Expressing his opinions.
c. Casting his votes
*Elements of 2nd:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he arrests or searches any member
of the National Assembly.
3. That the Assembly, at the time of the
arrest or search, is in regular or special
session.
4. That the member arrested or searched
has not committed a crime punishable
under the code by a penalty of prision
mayor or higher.
14
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 145 – ILLEGAL ASSEMBLIES
Any meeting attended by armed
persons for the purpose of committing
any of the crimes punishable under the
code.
2. Any meeting in which the audience,
whether armed or not, is incited to the
commission of the crime of treason,
rebellion or insurrection, sedition or
assault upon a person in authority or his
agents.
2. Inciting to rebellion or sedition insofar
as the one inciting them is concerned.
1.
*Elements of the 1st:
1. That there is a meeting, a gathering or
group of persons, whether in a fixed
place or moving.
2. That the meeting is attended by armed
persons
3. That the purpose of the meeting is to
commit any of the crimes punishable
under the code.
*Elements of the 2nd:
1. That there is a meeting, a gathering or
group of persons, whether in a fixed
place or moving.
2. That the audience, whether armed or
not, is incited to the commission of the
crime of treason, rebellion or
insurrection, sedition or direct assault.
*The person present at the meeting must be
armed in the first form of illegal assembly – but
not all the persons present at the meeting of
the first form of illegal assembly must be
armed.
*If in a meeting, the audience is incited to the
commission of rebellion or sedition, the crimes
committed are:
1. Illegal assembly as regard to:
a. The organizer or leaders
b. Persons merely present
*Persons liable for illegal assembly:
1. The organizers or leaders of the
meeting
2. Persons merely present at the meeting.
*The persons merely present at the meeting
must have common intent to commit the felony
of illegal assembly – the absence of such intent
may exempt the person present from criminal
liability.
*Responsibility of persons merely present at
the meeting:
1. If they are armed – Penalty is Arresto Mayor
2. If they carry arms – Penalty is Prision
Correccional
*If any person present at the meeting carries an
unlicensed firearm:
1. It is presumed that the purpose of the
meeting insofar as he is concerned, is to commit
acts punishable under the code.
2. He is considered a leader or organizer of the
meeting.
ARTICLE 147 – ILLEGAL ASSOCIATIONS
*Illegal Associations:
1. Associations
totally or
partially
organized for the purpose of
committing any of the crimes
punishable under the code.
2. Associations
totally or
partially
organized for some purpose contrary to
public morals.
*Persons liable for Illegal association:
1. Founders, directors and president of the
association.
2. Mere members of the association.
ARTICLE 148 – DIRECT ASSAULT
15
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Two ways of committing direct assault:
1. Without public uprising by employing
force or intimidation for the attainment
of any of the purposes enumerated in
defining the crimes of rebellion and
sedition.
2. Without public uprising, by attacking,
by employing force and intimidation or
seriously resisting any person in the
performance of official duties, or on the
occasion of such performance.
*Elements of 1st form of direct assault:
1. That the offender employs force or
intimidation.
2. That the aim of the offender is to attain
any of the purposes of the crime of
rebellion or any of the objects in the
crime of sedition.
3. That there is no public uprising.
- The force need not be serious when the
offended party is a person in authority.
*The intimidation or resistance must be serious
whether the offended party is an agent or
person in authority.
*The intimidation must produce its effects
immediately.
*Person in authority – any person directly
vested with jurisdiction, whether as an
individual or as a member of some court or
governmental
corporation,
board,
or
commission. (The power or authority to govern
and execute laws.)
*Agent of a person in authority – one who, by
direct provision of law or by election or by
appointment by competent authority, is
charged with the maintenance of public order
and the protection and security of life and
property.
*Elements of 2nd form of direct assault:
1. That the offender (a) makes an attack,
(b) by employing force, (c) makes a
serious intimidation or (d) makes a
serious resistance.
2. That the person assaulted is a person in
authority or his agent.
3. That at the time of the assault the
person in authority or his agent (a) is
engaged in actual performance of
official duties, or that he is assaulted (b)
by reason of past performance of
official duties.
4. That the offender knows that the one
he is assaulting is a person in authority
or his agent in the exercise of his duties
5. That there is no public uprising.
*Two kinds of direct assault of the 2nd form:
1. Simple assault
2. Qualified assault
*Direct assault is qualified:
1. When the assault is committed with a
weapon.
2. When the offender is a public officer or
employee.
3. When the offender lays hand upon a person
in authority.
*Crime of slight physical injuries is absorbed in
direct assault – inherent.
ARTICLE 149 – INDIRECT ASSAULT
*Elements:
*Shall attack – any offensive movement or
action of any kind.
*Employ force –
- If agent of a person in authority – force must
be of serious character.
1. That the person in authority or his
agent is the victim of any of the forms
of direct assault in article 148.
2. That a person comes to the aid of such
person in authority or his agent.
16
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
3. That the offender makes use of force or
intimidation upon such person coming
to the aid of the person in authority or
his agent.
*Indirect assault can be committed only when a
direct assault is committed.
ARTICLE 150 – DISOBEDIENCE TO SUMMONS
ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, ITS
COMMITTEES OR SUBCOMMITTEES, BY
CONSTITUTIONAL
COMMISSION,
COMMITTEES,
SUBCOMMITTEES
OR
DIVISIONS.
*Acts punished:
1. By refusing, without legal excuse, to
obey summons of the National
Assembly,
its
committees
or
subcommittees,
by
constitutional
commission,
committees,
subcommittees or division.
2. By refusing to be sworn or placed under
affirmation while being before such
legislative or constitutional body or
official.
3. By refusing to answer any legal inquiry
or to produce any books, papers,
documents, or records in his
possession, when required by them to
do so in the exercise of their function.
4. By restraining another from attending
as a witness in such legislative or
constitutional body.
5. By inducing disobedience to a summons
or refusal to be sworn by any such body
or official.
*Only disobedience without legal excuse is
punishable.
*May not apply when papers or documents
may be used as evidence against the owner
thereof.
ARTICLE 151 – RESISTANCE AND DISOBEDIENCE
TO A PERSON IN AUTHORITY OR THE AGENT
OF SUCH PERSON
*Elements of
disobedience:
resistance
and
serious
1. That a person in authority or his agent
is engaged in the performance of
official duty or gives a lawful order to
the offender.
2. That the offender resists or seriously
disobeys such person in authority or his
agent.
3. That the act of the offender is not
included in the provisions of the articles
148, 149 and 150.
*Elements of simple disobedience:
1. That an agent of a person in authority is
engaged in the performance of official
duty or gives lawful order to the
offender.
2. That the offender disobeys such agent
of a person in authority.
3. That such disobedience is not a serious
nature.
*The offended party must be only an agent of a
person in authority.
*Direct assault vs. Resistance or serious
disobedience –
- Direct assault 1st form – Person in authority or
his agent must be engaged in the performance
of official duties or that he is assaulted by
reason thereof.
- Serious disobedience – The person in authority
or his agent must be in actual performance of
his duties.
-Direct assault 2nd form – committed in four
ways (a) by attacking (b) by employing force (b)
by seriously intimidating (d) by seriously
resisting a person in authority or his agent.
17
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
- Resistance or serious disobedience is
committed only by resisting or seriously
disobeying person in authority or his agent.
*When the attack or employment of force is not
deliberate, the crime is only resistance or
disobedience.
ARTICLE 152 – PERSONS IN AUTHORITY AND
AGENTS OF PERSONS IN AUTHORITY
*Persons in authority – any person directly
vested with jurisdiction whether as an
individual or as a member of some court or
governmental
corporation
board
or
commission.
*Agent of a person in authority – any person
who, by direct provision of laws or by election
or by appointment by competent authority, is
charged with the maintenance of public order
and the protection and security of life and
property.
* Di e tl
ested ith ju isdi tio
– The
power and authority to govern and execute
laws.
*To be an agent of a person in authority, one
must be charged with (1) the maintenance of
public order, and (2) the protection and security
of life and property.
4. Displaying placards or emblems which
provoke a disturbance of public order in
such place;
5. Burying with pomp the body of a
person who has been legally executed.
*Serious disturbance must be planned or
intended.
*If the act of disturbing or interrupting a
meeting or religious ceremony is not committed
by public officer, or if committed by public
officer they are participant therein, article 153
should be applied.
*Outcry – shout subversive or provocative
words tending to stir up the people to obtain by
means of force or violence any of the objects of
rebellion or sedition.
*Inciting vs. Public disorder
- In public disorder, the outcry is not
intentionally calculated to induce others to
commit rebellion or sedition.
*Tumultuous – the disturbance or interruption
caused by more than 3 persons (4 or more) who
are armed or provided with means of violence.
ARTICLE 154 – UNLAWFUL USE OF MEANS OF
PUBLICATION AND UNLAWFUL UTTERANCES
*ACTS PUNISHED:
ARTICLE 153 – TUMULTS AND
DISTURBANCES OF PUBLIC ORDER
OTHER
*What are tumults and other disturbances of
public order :
1. Causing any serious disturbance in a
public place, office or establishment;
2. Interrupting
or
disturbing
performances, functions or gatherings,
or peaceful meetings, if the act is not
included in articles 131 and 132;
3. Making an outcry tending to incite
rebellion or sedition in any meeting,
association or public place;
1. By punishing or causing to be published,
by means of printing, lithography or any
other means of publication, as news
any false news which may endanger the
public order, or cause damage to the
interest or credit of the state.
2. By encouraging disobedience to the law
or to the constituted authorities or by
praising, justifying or extolling any act
punished by law, by the same means or
words, utterances or speeches.
3. By maliciously publishing or causing to
be published any official resolution or
document without proper authority, or
18
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
before they have been published
officially.
4. By printing, publishing or distributing
books, pamphlets, periodicals or
leaflets hi h do ot ea eal p i te ’s
name or which are classified as
anonymous.
*Actual public disorder or actual damage to the
credit of the state is not necessary.
*The offender must know that the news is false
– It must endanger or may endanger the public
order.
ARTICLE 155 – ALARMS AND SCANDALS
*Acts punished:
1. Discharging any firearm, rocket,
firecracker, or other explosive within
any town or public place calculated to
cause alarm or danger.
2. Instigating or taking an active part in
any charivari or other disorderly
meeting offensive to another or
prejudicial to public tranquility.
3. Disturbing the public peace while
wandering about at night or while
engaged in any other nocturnal
amusement.
4. Causing any disturbance or scandal in
public places while intoxicated or
otherwise provided article 153 is not
applicable.
*The discharge of firearm should not be aimed
at a person; otherwise, the offense would fall
under article 254, punishing discharge of
firearms.
*Charivari – a medley of discordant voices, a
mock serenade of discordant noises made on
kettles, tins, horns. Designed to annoy and
insult.
ARTICLE 156 – DELIVERING PRISONERS FROM
JAIL
*Elements:
1. That there is a person confined in jail or
penal establishment.
2. That the offender removes therefrom
such person, or helps the escape of
such person.
*Prisoner may be under detention only.
*Hospitals or asylums are considered extension
of jail or prison.
*If the crime committed by the prisoner for
which he is confined is treason, murder or
parricide, the act of taking the place of the
prisoner in the prison is that of an accessory –
because he assisted in the escape of the
principal.
*If the person/prisoner removed or escaped is
made possible by the commission of article 156
is a detention prisoner, such prisoner is not
criminally liable. Only those who evade the
service of their sentence are criminally liable.
ARTICLE 157 – EVASION OF SERVICE OF
SENTENCE
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a convict by final
judgment.
2. That he is serving his sentence which
consists in deprivation of liberty.
3. That he evades the service of his
sentence by escaping during the term
of his sentence.
*The sentence must be by reason of final
judgment. – Not applicable to sentence
executed by deportation.
*It should be by escaping during the term of his
sentence which consists in deprivation of
liberty.
19
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Article 157 is applicable to sentence of
destierro.
*Circumstances qualifying the offense – if such
evasion or escape takes place:
*What is punished is not the leaving of the
penal institution, but the failure of the convict
to give himself up to the authorities within 48
hours after the proclamation announcing the
passing away of the calamity.
1. By means of unlawful entry;
2. By breaking doors, windows, gates,
walls, roofs, or floors;
3. By using picklocks, false keys, disguise,
deceit, violence or intimidation;
4. Through connivance with other convicts
or employees of the penal institution.
*If the offender fails to give himself up, he gets
an increased penalty – increase of 1/5 of the
time still remaining to be served under the
original sentence. (But not to exceed 6 months)
ARTICLE 158 – EVASION OF SERVICE OF
SENTENCE ON THE OCCASION OF DISORDERS,
CONFLAGRATIONS, EARTHQUAKES, OR OTHER
CALAMITIES
*Mutiny – an organized unlawful resistance to a
superior officer; sedition; a revolt.
*If the offender gives himself up, he is entitled
to a deduction of 1/5 of his sentence.
ARTICLE 159 – OTHER CASES OF EVASION OF
SERVICE OF SENTENCE (Conditional pardon)
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a convict by final
judgment, who is confined in a penal
institution.
2. That there is disorder, resulting from –
a. Conflagration
b. Earthquake
c. Explosion
d. Similar catastrophe, or
e. Mutiny in which he has not
participated.
3. That the offender evades the service of
his sentence by leaving the penal
institution where he is confined, on the
occasion of such disorder or during the
mutiny.
4. That the offender fails to give himself
up to the authorities within 48 hours
following
the
issuance
of
a
proclamation by the chief executive
announcing the passing away of such
calamity.
*The offender must be a convict by final
judgment.
*The convict must leave the penal institution.
*A conditional pardon is a contract between the
Chief Executive, who grants the pardon, and the
convict, who accepts it.
*The pardoned convict is bound to fulfill the
conditions and accept all its consequences not
as he chooses, but according to the strict terms
(People vs. Pontillas)
*Elements of the offense of violation of
conditional pardon:
1. That the offender was a convict.
2. That he was granted a conditional
pardon by the Chief Executive.
3. That he violated any of the conditions
of such pardon.
*Violation of conditional pardon is distinct
crime.
*conditions extend to special laws.
*Offender must be found guilty of subsequent
offense before he can be prosecuted under
article 159.
*Offender can be arrested and reincarcerated
without trial – violation of conditional pardon.
20
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*The period when convict was at liberty, not
deducted in case he is recommitted.
ARTICLE 160 – COMMISSION OF ANOTHER
CRIME DURING SERVICE OF PENALTY IMPOSED
FOR ANOTHER PREVIOUS OFFENSE
*Quasi-recidivism – is a special aggravating
circumstance where a person, after having been
convicted by final judgment, shall commit a new
felony before beginning to serve such sentence,
or while serving the same.
*He shall be punished by the maximum period
of the penalty prescribed by law for the new
penalty.
*Elements:
1. That the offender was already
convicted by final judgment of one
offense.
2. That he committed a new felony before
beginning to serve such sentence or
while serving the same.
*The second crime must be a felony (RPC) – but
the first crime for which the offender is serving
sentence need not be a felony.
*The new offense need not be of different
character from that of the former offense.
*Quasi-recidivism does not require that the two
offenses are embraced in the same title of the
code – only in recidivism that it is required –
article 14 no. 9
*Quasi-recidivism vs. reiteracion
- Reiteracion requires that the offender against
whom it is considered shall have served out his
sentences for the prior offenses.
*Quasi-recidivism cannot be offset by ordinary
mitigating circumstances – if privileged
mitigating (one degree lower)
*A quasi-recidivist may be pardoned at the age
of 70 years – when he has already served out
his original sentence, or when he shall complete
it after reaching the said age, unless by reason
of his conduct or other circumstances he shall
not be worthy of such clemency.
*But only a convict who is not a habitual
criminal shall be pardoned.
ARTICLE 161 – COUNTERFEITING THE GREAT
SEAL OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE
ISLAND, FORGING THE SIGNATURE OR STAMP
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
*Acts punished:
1. Forging the great seal of the
government of the Philippines.
2. Forging the signature of the President.
3. Forging the stamp of the President.
*Great seal – circular in form, with arms
consisting of paleways of two pieces, azures and
gules; chief argent studded with three golden
star equidistant from each other, in point of
honor, ovoid argent over the sun rayonnant
with eight minor and lesser rays; in sinister base
gules, the lion rampant of spain; in dexter base
azure, the American eagle displayed proper;
and surrounding the whole is a double marginal
i le ithi
hi h a e the o ds Repu li of
the Philippi es.
*The great seal shall be and remain in the
custody of the President of the Philippines, and
shall be affixed to or placed upon all
commissions signed by him, and signed by him,
and upon such other official documents and
papers of the Republic of the Philippines as may
by law be provided, or as may be required by
custom and usage in the discretion of the
President of the Philippines.
ARTICLE 162 – USING FORGED SIGNATURE OR
COUNTERFEITING SEAL OR STAMP
*Elements:
21
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
1. That great seal of the Republic was
counterfeited or the signature or stamp
of the chief executive was forged by
another person.
2. That the offender knew of the
counterfeiting or forgery.
3. That he used the counterfeit seal or
forged signature or stamp.
*The offender under this article should not be
the forger.
ARTICLE 163 – MAKING AND IMPORTING AND
UTTERING FALSE COINS
*Elements:
1. That there be false or counterfeited
coins.
2. That the offender either made,
imported or uttered such coins.
3. That in case of uttering such false or
counterfeited coins, he connived with
the counterfeiters or importers.
*Kinds of coins:
1. Silver coin of the Philippines or coins of
the central bank of the Philippines.
2. Coin of the minor coinage of the
Philippines or of the central bank of the
Philippines.
3. Coin of the currency of a foreign
country.
*Minor coins – the coins below ten-centavo
denomination.
*Former coins withdrawn from circulation may
be counterfeited under article 163. – Paragraph
a d of a ti le
e tio ed oi
ithout
a
ualif i g o d, su h as u e t .
ARTICLE 164 – MUTILATION OF COINS
*Acts punished:
*A coin is false or counterfeited, if it is forged or
if it is not authorized by the government as legal
tender regardless of its intrinsic value.
1. Mutilating coins of legal currency, with
the further requirement that there be
intent to damage or to defraud another.
2. Importing or uttering such mutilated
coins, with the further requirement that
there must be connivance with the
mutilator or importer in case of
uttering.
*Counterfeiting – imitation of a legal or genuine
coin. – There must be an imitation of the
peculiar design of a genuine coin. (US vs. Basco)
*Mutilation – to take off part of the metal
either by filling it or substituting it for another
metal of inferior quality.
*Import – means to bring them into port – the
importation is complete before entry at the
customs house.
*The coin must be of legal tender in mutilation.
*Coins of foreign country are not included.
*The coin mutilated must be genuine and has
not been withdrawn from circulation.
*Coin – is a piece of metal stamped with certain
marks and made current at a certain value.
*Utter – to pass counterfeited coins. – It
includes their delivery or the act of giving them
away.
*When caught counting the counterfeited coins
preparatory to the act of delivering them, even
though the utterer may not obtain the gain he
intended.
ARTICLE 165 – SELLING OF FALSE OR
MUTILATED COINS, WITHOUT CONNIVANCE
*Acts punished:
1. Possession of coin, counterfeited or
mutilated by another person, with
22
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
intent to utter the same, knowing that
it is false or mutilated.
2. Actually uttering such false or mutilated
coin, knowing the same to be false or
mutilated.
*Elements of 1st act:
a. Possession
b. With intent to utter, and
c. Knowledge
*Elements of 2nd act:
a. Actually uttering, and
b. Knowledge
*Possession of or uttering false coins does not
require that the counterfeited coin is legal
tender.
*But if the coin being uttered or possessed with
intent to utter is a mutilated coin, it must be
legal tender coin.
*Constructive possession of such coin is
included.
*Actually uttering false or mutilated coin,
knowing it to be false or mutilated, is a crime
under article 165, even if the offender was not
in connivance with the counterfeiter or
mutilator.
*The accused must have knowledge of the fact
that the coin is false.
ARTICLE 166 – FORGING TREASURY OR BANK
NOTES OR OTHER DOCUMENTS PAYABLE TO
BEARER, IMPORTING, AND UTTERING SUCH
FALSE OR FORGED NOTES AND DOCUMENTS.
*Acts punished:
1. Forging or falsification of treasury or
bank notes or other documents payable
to bearer.
2. Importation of such false or forged
obligations or notes.
3. Uttering of such false or forged
obligations or notes in connivance with
the forgers or importers.
*Forging and falsification:
-Forging – committed by giving to a treasury or
bank note or any instrument payable to bearer
or to order the appearance of a true and
genuine document.
-Falsification – committed by erasing,
substituting, counterfeiting, or altering by any
means, the figures, letters, words, or signs
contained therein.
*To forge an instrument is to make false
instrument intended to be passed for the
genuine one.
*Importation of false or forged obligations or
notes – to bring them into the Philippines,
which presuppose that, the obligation or notes
are forged or falsified in a foreign country.
*Uttering false or forged obligation or notes –
offering obligations or notes knowing them to
be false or forged, whether such offer is
accepted or not, with a representation, by
words or actions, that they are not genuine and
with an intent to defraud.
*Uttering forged bill must be with connivance
to constitute violation of article 166.
*Notes and other obligations and securities that
may be forged or falsified:
1. Treasury or bank notes
2. Certificates
3. Other obligations and securities payable to
bearer.
*A bank note, certificate or obligation and
security is payable to bearer when it can be
negotiated by mere delivery.
*The instrument is payable to bearer –
a. When it is expressed to be so payable;
or
23
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
b. When it is payable to a person named
therein or bearer; or
c. When it is payable to the order of a
fictitious or non-existing person;
d. The name of the payee does not
purport to be the name of any person;
e. When the only or last indorsement is an
indorsement in blank.
*The code punishes forging or falsification of
bank notes and of documents of credit payable
to bearer and issued by the state more severely
than counterfeiting of coins.
*Obligation or security of US and other foreign
countries are included under this provision.
*Obligation or security of the Philippines:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
Bonds
Certificate of indebtedness
National bank notes
Coupons
Treasury notes
Fractional notes
Certificate of deposits
Bills
Checks
Drafts for money
Other representatives of value issued
under any act of congress
*Money bills issued by the Central Bank are
National bank notes.
ARTICLE 167 – COUNTERFEITING, IMPORTING,
AND UTTERING INSTRUMENTS NOT PAYABLE
TO BEARER
*Elements:
1. That there be an instrument payable to
order or other document of credit not
payable to bearer.
2. That the offender either forged,
imported or uttered such instrument.
3. That in case of uttering, he connived
with the forger or importer.
*Article 167 is limited to instruments payable to
order or other documents of credit not payable
to bearer.
*The instrument is payable to order – when it is
drawn payable to the order of a specified
person or to him or his order.
*Article 167 covers instrument or other
documents of credit issued by a foreign
government or bank.
*Reason for punishing forgery – to maintain the
integrity of the currency and thus insure the
credit standing of the government and prevent
the imposition on the public and the
government of worthless notes or obligations.
*Connivance is not required in uttering if the
utterer is the forger.
ARTICLE 168 – ILLEGAL POSSESSION AND USE
OF FALSE TREASURY OR BANK NOTES AND
OTHER INSTRUMENT OF CREDIT
*Elements:
1. That any treasury or bank note or
certificate or other obligation and
security payable to bearer, or any
instrument payable to order or other
documents of credit not payable to
bearer is forged or falsified by another
person.
2. That the offender knows that any of
those instruments is forged or falsified.
3. That he performs any of these acts –
a. Using any of such forged or
falsified instrument; or
b. Possessing with intent to use
any of such forged or falsified
instrument.
*The possession must be with intent to use said
false treasury or bank notes.
24
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Bank note is forged when the serial number
which the questioned bank note bears does not
check with the genuine one issued with the
same number.
*Accused must have knowledge of the forged
character of the note.
*A person in possession of falsified document
and who makes use of the same is presumed to
be material author of falsification.
*Mere possession of false money bill, without
intent to use it to the damage of another, is not
a crime.
ARTICLE 169 – HOW FORGERY IS COMMITTED
*Forgery
includes
counterfeiting.
falsification
and
*Classes of falsification –
1. Falsification of legislative document (article
170)
2. Falsification of a document by a public
officer, employee or notary public (article 171)
3. Falsification of a public or official, commercial
document by a private individual (article 172,
paragraph 1)
4. Falsification of a private document by any
person (article 172, paragraph 2)
5. Falsification of wireless, telegraph and
telephone messages (article 173)
*Falsification vs. Forgery
*Forgery – the falsification and counterfeiting
of treasury or bank notes or any instruments
payable to bearer or to order.
*Falsification – the commission of any of the
eight acts mentioned in article 171 on
legislative, public or official, commercial, or
private documents, or wireless, or telegraph
messages.
ARTICLE 170 – FALSIFICATION OF LEGISLATIVE
DOCUMENTS
*Elements:
1. That there be a bill, resolution or
ordinance enacted or approved or
pending approval by either house of the
legislature or any provincial board or
municipal council.
2. That the offender alters the same.
3. That he has no proper authority
thereof.
4. That the alteration has changed the
meaning of the document.
*Municipal council should include the city
council or municipal board.
*The bill, resolution or ordinance must be
genuine.
*The act of falsification in legislative document
is limited to allowing it which changes its
meaning.
ARTICLE 171 – FALSIFICATION BY PUBLIC
OFFICER, EMPLOYEE OR NOTARY OR
ECCLESIASTICAL
MINISTER
(PUBLIC
DOCUMENT)
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer,
employee, or notary public.
2. That he takes advantage of his official
position.
3. That he falsifies a document by
committing any of the following acts:
a. Counterfeiting or imitating any
handwriting,
signature
or
rubric.
b. Causing it to appear that
persons have participated in
any act or proceeding when
they did not in fact so
participate.
c. Attributing to persons who
have participated in an act or
proceeding statements other
than those in fact made by
them.
25
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
d. Making untruthful statements
in a narration of facts.
e. Altering true dates.
f. Making any alteration or
intercalation in a genuine
document which changes its
meaning.
g. Issuing in authenticated form a
document purporting to be a
copy of an original document
when no such original exist, or
including in such copy a
statement contrary to, or
different from, that of the
genuine original.
h. Intercalating any instrument or
note relative to the issuance
thereof in a protocol, registry or
official book.
4. In case the offender is an ecclesiastical
minister, the act of falsification is
committed with respect to any record
or document of such character that its
falsification may affect the civil status of
persons.
*Persons liable –
- Only public officers, employee or notary public
or ecclesiastical minister.
*The offender takes advantage of his official
position in falsifying a document when:
1. He has the duty to make or propose or
otherwise to intervene in the
preparation of the document.
2. He has the official custody of the
document which he falsifies.
*Even if the offender was a public officer but if
he did not take advantage of his official
position, he would be guilty of falsification of a
document by a private person under article 172.
*Document – any written statement by which a
right is established or an obligation
extinguished. – Writing or instrument by which
a fact may be proven and affirmed.
*The document must be complete or at least it
must have the appearance of a true and
genuine document.
*The document must be of apparent legal
efficacy.
*There must be a genuine document that is
falsified in acts 6, 7, and 8; the other acts do not
need such.
*It is sufficient that the document is given the
appearance of or made to appear similar to, the
original form.
*Simulation of public, official or mercantile
document is also contemplated in falsification
of those documents.
*It is not necessary to specify in article 171 the
document falsified, because when the
document is executed with the intervention of a
public officer, employee or notary public, such
document must necessarily be a public or
official document.
*If the offender is a private individual or a
public officer who does not take advantage of
his official position, article 172 shall apply.
*Paragraph 1 – Counterfeiting or imitating any
handwriting, signature or rubric.
*Two ways of committing falsification in
paragraph 1:
1. Counterfeiting, which is imitating any
handwriting, signature or rubric.
2. Feigning, which is simulating a
signature, handwriting or rubric out of
one which does not in fact exist.
*There is an original signature or handwriting
which is imitated. – An imitation is necessary,
but it need not be perfect.
*Requisites of counterfeiting:
1. There be an intent to imitate, or an attempt
to imitate.
26
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
2. That the two signatures or handwriting, the
genuine and the forged, bear some
resemblance to each other.
*There must be an intent or attempt to imitate
– if there is sufficient resemblance.
*Feign – represent by a false appearance; to
give a mental existence to; to imagine.
*Paragraph 2 – Causing it to appear that
persons have participated in an act or a
proceeding
*Requisites:
1. That the offender caused it to appear in
a document that a person or persons
participated in an act or a proceeding.
2. That such person or persons did not in
fact so participate in the act or
proceeding.
3. That the facts narrated by the offender
are absolutely false.
4. The perversion of truth in the narration
of facts was made with the wrongful
intent of injuring a third person.
*There must be narration of facts, not of
conclusion of law.
*The perversion of truth in the narration of
facts must be made with the wrongful intent of
injuring a third person.
*Wrongful intent, not essential in falsification of
public document.
*There is no falsification by one acted in good
faith.
*Paragraph 5 – Altering true dates
*There is falsification when the date is
essential.
*Paragraph 3 – Attributing to persons who
have participated in any act or proceeding
statement other than those in fact made by
them
*Paragraph 6 – Making alteration or
intercalation in a genuine document which
changes its meaning
*Requisites:
*Requisites:
1. That a person or persons participated in
an act or a proceeding.
2. That such person or persons made
statements in that act or proceedings
3. That the offender, in making document,
attributed to such person or persons
statements other than those in fact
made by such person or persons.
1. That there be an alteration or
intercalation on a document.
2. That it was made on a genuine
document.
3. That the alteration or intercalation has
changed the meaning of the document.
4. That the changes made the document
speak something false.
*Paragraph 4 – Making untruthful statements
in a narration of facts
*Alteration which speaks the truth is not
falsification.
*Requisites:
*The alteration must affect the integrity or
change the effects of the document.
1. That the offender makes in a document
statements in a narration of facts.
2. That he has legal obligation to disclose
the truth of the fact narrated by him.
*Paragraph 7 – Issuing in authenticated form a
document purporting to be a copy of an
original document when no such original exist,
27
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
or including in such a copy a statement
contrary to, or different from, that of the
genuine original
*Can be committed only by a public officer or
notary public who takes advantage of his official
position.
*A private individual who cooperates with a
public officer in the falsification of public
document is guilty of this crime and incurs same
liability and penalty as the public officer.
*Intent to gain or to prejudice is not necessary
in this crime.
ARTICLE 172 – FALSIFICATION BY PRIVATE
INDIVIDUALS AND USE OF FALSIFIED
DOCUMENTS (PRIVATE DOCUMENT)
*Acts punished:
1. Falsification of public, official or
commercial documents by a private
individual. (Paragraph 1)
2. Falsification of private documents by
any person (Paragraph 2)
3. Use of falsified document (Paragraph 3)
1. Public documents – a document
created, executed or issued by a public
official in response to the exigencies of
the public service, or in the execution of
which a public official intervene.
2. Official document – a document which
is issued by a public official in the
exercise of the functions of his office.
3. Private document – a deed or
instrument executed by a private
person without the intervention of a
notary public or other person legally
authorized by which document some
disposition or agreement is proved,
evidenced or set forth.
4. Commercial document – any document
defined and regulated by the code of
commerce.
*The possessor of a falsified document is
presumed to be the author of the falsification.
*Damage or intent to cause such is not
necessary.
*Lack of malice or criminal intent is a defense in
falsification of public document.
*Falsification under paragraph 1
*Falsification under paragraph 2
*Elements:
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a private individual
or a public officer or employee who did
not take advantage of his official
position.
2. The he committed any of the acts of
falsification enumerated in article 171.
3. That the falsification was committed in
a public or official or commercial
document.
1. That the offender committed any of the
acts of falsification, except those in
paragraph 7, enumerated in article 171.
2. Falsification was committed in any
private document.
3. The falsification caused damage to a
third party or at least the falsification
was committed with intent to cause
such damage.
*The offender should not be a public officer,
employee, or notary public, who takes
advantage of his official position.
*Falsification of public document may be
complexed to estafa, theft or malversation.
*Kinds of documents:
*No falsification of private document through
reckless imprudence
28
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
-private doc – no intention to cause damage –
not punished
-public doc – no intention to cause damage –
still punished
*Use of falsified document (Paragraph 3)
*Elements:
-Introducing in a judicial proceeding
1. That the offender knew that a
document was falsified by another.
2. That the false document is embraced in
article 171 or in numbers 1 and 2 of
article 172.
3. That he introduced said document in
evidence in any judicial proceedings.
-Use in any other transaction
1. That the offender knew that a
document was falsified by another.
2. That the document is embraced in
article 171 or numbers 1 and 2 of article
172.
3. That he used such documents.
4. That the use of the false documents
caused damage to another or at least
used with intent to cause such damage.
ARTICLE 173 – FALSIFICATION OF WIRELESS,
CABLE,
TELEGRAPH,
AND
TELEPHONE
MESSAGES, AND USE OF SAID FALSIFIED
MESSAGES.
*Acts punished:
1. Uttering fictitious wireless, telegraph or
telephone message.
2. Falsification wireless, telegraph or
telephone message.
3. Using such falsified message.
*Uttering fictitious message or falsifying the
same (Paragraph 1)
1. That the offender is an officer or
employee of the government or of a
private corporation engaged in the
service of sending or receiving wireless,
cable, or telephone message.
2. The offender commits any of the act
a. Uttering fictitious wireless,
cable, telegraph, or telephone
message.
b. Falsifying
wireless,
cable,
telegraph,
or
telephone
message.
*Use of falsified message (Paragraph 2)
*Elements:
1. That the accused knew that wireless,
cable, telegraph or telephone message
was falsified by any person in the first
paragraph of article 173.
2. The accused used such falsified
dispatch.
3. The use of the falsified dispatch
resulted in the prejudice of a third
party, or there was intent to the same.
ARTICLE 174 – FALSE MEDICAL CERTIFICATES,
FALSE CERTIFICATES OF MERITS OR SERVICE,
ETC.
*Certificate – any writing by which testimony is
given that a fact has or not taken place.
*Persons liable:
1. Physician or surgeon
2. Public officer
3. Private individual
ARTICLE 175 – USING FALSE CERTIFICATES
*Elements:
1. That a physician or surgeon has issued a
false medical certificate, or a public
officer had issued false certificate of
*Elements:
29
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
merit or a private individual falsified
any of the said certificates.
2. That the offender knew that the
certificate was false.
3. That he used the same.
*There must be positive, express and explicit
representation.
*False representation may be shown by acts.
*Article 177 may be violated by a public officer.
ARTICLE 176 – MANUFACTURING
POSSESSION
OF
INSTRUMENTS
IMPLEMENT FOR FALSIFICATION
AND
OR
*Acts punished:
1. Making or introducing into the
Philippines any stamps, dies, marks or
other instruments or implements for
counterfeiting or falsification.
2. Possessing with intent to use the
instruments
or
implements
for
counterfeiting or falsification made in
or introduced into the Philippines by
another person.
*The implements confiscated need not form a
complete set.
ARTICLE 177 – USURPATION OF AUTHORITY OR
OFFICIAL FUNCTIONS
*Two offense in article 177 –
- Usurpation of authority
- Usurpation of official functions
*Usurper – one who, introduces himself into an
office that is vacant, or who, without color of
title, ousts the government and assume to act
as an officer by exercising some of the functions
of the office.
*Article 177 punishes usurpation of authority or
official functions of any officer of any foreign
government.
ARTICLE 178 – USING FICTITIOUS NAME AND
CONCEALING TRUE NAME
*Elements: (Using fictitious name)
1. That the offender uses a name other
than his real name.
2. That he uses that fictitious name
publicly.
3. That the purpose of the offender is:
a. To conceal a crime;
b. To evade the execution of a
judgment; or
c. To cause damage to public
interest.
*Two ways of committing the crime:
1. By knowingly and falsely representing
oneself to be an officer, agent or
representative of any department or
agency of the Philippine government or
any foreign government.
2. By performing any act pertaining to any
person in authority or public officer of
the Philippine government or of a
foreign government or any agency
thereof, under pretense of official
position, and without being lawfully
entitled to do so.
*Fictitious name – any other name which a
person publicly applies to himself without
authority of law.
*Causing damage must be to public interest, if
the damage is private interest, the crime will be
estafa.
*Signing fictitious name in an application for
passport is publicly using such fictitious name.
*Elements: (Concealing true name)
1. That the offender conceals –
a. His true name; and
30
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
b. All
other
personal
circumstances.
2. That the purpose is only to conceal his
identity.
*Commonwealth act no. 142 – sec 1 – except as
pseudonym solely for literary, cinema,
television, radio or other entertainment
purposes and in athletic events where the use
of pseudonym is a normally accepted practice,
o pe so shall use a
a e diff…
ARTICLE 179 – ILLEGAL USE OF UNIFORMS OR
INSIGNIA
*Elements:
1. That the offender makes use of insignia,
uniform or dress.
2. That the insignia, uniform or dress
pertains to an office not held by the
offender or to a class of persons of
which he is not a member.
3. That said insignia, uniform or dress is
used publicly and improperly.
*Wearing the uniform of an imaginary office is
not punished.
*An exact imitation of a uniform or dress in
unnecessary – a colorable resemblance
calculated to deceive the common run of
people – not those thoroughly familiar with
every detail or accessory thereof – is sufficient.
*Using or wearing unauthorized naval military,
police, or other official uniform, decoration or
regalia of a foreign state, or one nearly
resembling the same – with intent to deceive or
mislead are punished by RA No. 75.
*Wearing insignia, badge or emblem of rank of
the members of the armed forces of the
Philippines or constabulary are punished by RA
493.
*illegal manufacture, sale, distribution and use
of PNP uniforms, insignias and other
accoutrements are punished by EO 297.
ARTCLE 180 – FALSE TESTIMONY AGAINST A
DEFENDANT
*False testimony – committed by a person who,
being under oath and required to testify as to
the truth of a certain matters at a hearing
before a competent authority, shall deny the
truth or say something contrary to it.
*Forms of false testimony:
1. False testimony in criminal case (article
180 and 181)
2. False testimony in civil cases (article
182)
3. False testimony in other cases (article
183)
*Elements: (180)
1. That there be a criminal proceeding.
2. That the offender testifies falsely under
oath against the defendant therein.
3. That the offender who gives false
testimony knows that it is false.
4. That the defendant against whom the
false testimony is given is either
acquitted or convicted in a final
judgment.
*Penalty depends upon the sentence of the
defendant against whom the false testimony
was given. – if the penalty is light – perjury.
*Defendant must be sentenced at least to (1) a
correctional penalty, or (2) fine, or (3) must be
acquitted.
*The witness who gave false testimony is liable
even if his testimony was not considered by the
court.
ARTICLE 181 – FALSE TESTIMONY FAVORABLE
TO THE DEFENDANT
31
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Reason for punishing – tendency to favor or to
prejudice the defendant.
*The false testimony in favor of defendant need
not directly influence the decision of acquittal.
*Ways of committing perjury:
1. Falsely testifying under oath.
2. Making a false affidavit.
*Elements of perjury:
*It is sufficient that the false testimony was
given with intent to favor the defendant.
*It is sufficient that the defendant in the
principal case is prosecuted for a felony
punishable by afflictive penalty or by other
penalty.
*The defendant who falsely testified in his own
behalf in a criminal case is guilty of false
testimony favorable to the defendant.
*Ratification made spontaneously after
realizing the mistake is not false testimony.
ARTICLE 182 – FALSE TESTIMONY IN CIVIL CASE
*Elements:
1. That the testimony must be given in a
civil case.
2. That the testimony must relate to the
issues presented in said case.
3. That the testimony must be false.
4. That the false testimony must be given
by the defendant knowing the same to
be false.
5. That the testimony must be malicious
and given with an intent to affect the
issues presented in said case.
*Article 182 is not applicable when false
testimony is given in special proceedings.
*Whether or not the testimonies of private
respondent in the civil case are false is a
prejudicial question.
ARTICLE 183 – FALSE TESTIMONY IN OTHER
CASES
AND
PERJURY
IN
SOLEMN
AFFIRMATION
1. That the accused made a statement
under oath, or executed an affidavit
upon a material matter.
2. That the statement or affidavit was
made before a competent officer,
authorized to receive and administer
oath.
3. That in that statement or affidavit, the
accused made a willful and deliberate
assertion of a falsehood.
4. That the sworn statement or affidavit
containing the falsity is required by law.
*(must complete the whole stage of stating
testimony to be liable)
*Falsely testifying under oath should not be in a
judicial proceeding.
*Oath – any form of attestation by which a
person signifies that he is bound in conscience
to perform an act faithfully and truthfully.
*Affidavit – a sworn statement in writing, a
declaration in writing, made upon oath before
an authorized magistrate or officer.
*False affidavit to a criminal complaint may give
rise to perjury.
*Material Matter – it is the main fact which is
the subject of the inquiry or any circumstances
which tend to prove that fact.
*The matter is material when it is directed to
prove a fact in issue. – Relevant when it tends in
any reasonable degree to establish the
probability of a fact in issue. – Pertinent
concern collateral matter which makes more or
less probable the proposition at issues.
32
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*No perjury if sworn statement is not material
to the principal matter under investigation.
ARTICLES 188-189-RA 8293 – INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
*Article 183 catches everything else under 180,
181 and 182.
ARTICLES
190-193
REPEALED
BY
COMPREHENSIVE DANGEROUS DRUGS ACT.
*Perjury is an offense which covers false oaths
other than those taken in the course of judicial
proceedings.
*Section 4 – Importation of drugs:
- Committed by any person, who, unless
authorized by law, shall import or bring into the
Philippines any dangerous drug, regardless of
the quantity and purity involved.
*False testimony before the justice of peace or
fiscal during the preliminary investigation may
give rise to the crime of perjury.
*Subornation of perjury – committed by a
person who knowingly and willfully procures
another to swear falsely and the witness
suborned does testify under circumstances
rendering him guilty of perjury. (Inducement)
ARTICLE 184 – OFFERING FALSE TESTIMONY IN
EVIDENCE
*Elements:
1. That the offender offered in evidence a
false witness or false testimony.
2. That he knew the witness or the
testimony was false.
3. That the offer was made in a judicial or
official proceeding.
*Begins the moment a witness is called to the
witness stand and interrogated by counsel.
*The witness having desisted before he could
testify on any material matter is not liable.
ARTICLE 185 – MACHINATIONS IN PUBLIC
AUCTION
ARTICLE
186
–
MONOPOLIES
AND
COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE
ARTICLE
187
–
IMPORTATION
AND
DISPOSITION OF FALSELY MARKED ARTICLES
*Section 5 – Selling dangerous drugs:
- Act of giving away any dangerous drugs or
controlled precurs or/and essential chemical
whether for money or any other consideration.
*Elements:
1. Identity of the buyer and the seller.
(clearly identified)
2. The object and consideration.
3. Delivery of the thing sold and payment
thereof.
*Does not require that there must be giving of
the price/money, it suffice that the crime was
established.
*General rule – the testimony of the poseurbuyer is not indispensable in a case of illegal
sale of dangerous drugs.
*Exception – when the accused denies the
existence of the said transaction. If the
prosecution failed to present the poseur-buyer
to testify in court, it will amount to the
dismissal of the case.
*Deliver – an act of knowingly passing a
dangerous drug to another, personally or
otherwise, and by any means, with or without
consideration.
*Section 6 – Maintenance of a den, dive, or
resort:
- Any person who maintains a den, dive or
resort for the use of illegal drugs are liable
under this section.
33
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Section 7 – even the employees who are
aware of the nature of the said den, dive or
resort for the use of and sale of dangerous
drugs are criminally liable. – Even persons
whore are not employees, which knowingly visit
the same place despite the knowledge of the
nature of the said places are criminally liable.
*Section 8 – Manufacture of dangerous drugs:
- The presence if any controlled precursor and
essential chemical or laboratory equipment in
the clandestine laboratory is a prima facie
evidence of manufacture of any dangerous
drugs. (Production, preparation, combining, or
processing of dangerous drugs)
*Section 11 – Illegal possession of dangerous
drugs
2. After a confirmatory test, he was found
to be positive for the use of any
dangerous drugs.
3. No other amount of dangerous drugs
must be found in his possession.
*Mandatory drug testing:
- D i e ’s li e se
- Firearms license
- High school and college students
- Law enforcement officers/employee
- Candidates for public office
(Except – President, VP, members of the
congress – it is not required for it will be
unconstitutional.)
*Tests in use of dangerous drugs:
-Screening test
-Confirmatory test
*Elements:
1. The accused was in possession of
prohibited drugs.
2. Such possession is not authorized by
law.
3. The accused freely and consciously
possessed the prohibited drugs.
*Section 12 – Illegal possession of drug
paraphernalia
*Section 13 – Illegal possession of dangerous
drugs during parties, social gatherings or
meetings
- If any person was found in possession of
dangerous drug in a party, social gatherings or
meetings, or in the proximate company of at
least two persons, maximum penalty prescribed
by law shall be imposed.
*Section 15 – Illegal use of dangerous drugs
*Person arrested may not be forced to be
tested for illegal use of drugs for it will violate
his constitutional right.
*Voluntary submission program (for drug
dependent to avoid criminal liability):
1. Complied with rules and regulation of
the center.
2. Never been charged/convicted under
RA9165.
3. No record of escape from the center.
4. Poses no threat to self, family or
community.
*Section 21 – Procedure in the seizure and
confiscation of dangerous drug
*The apprehending team which has the initial
possession of the seized/confiscated dangerous
drugs shall: (Chain of custody rule)
*Elements:
1. The
offender
was
apprehended/arrested in the actual use
of dangerous drugs.
1. Inventory the dangerous drugs.
2. Take photographs of the same in the
presence of the accused or from the
person whom the drugs have been
confiscated or in the presence of his
34
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
counsel, representative from the media,
representative from the department of
justice and an elected official who shall
given a copy of the said inventory and
who shall be required to sign the same.
The duly recorded authorized movements and
custody of dangerous drugs from the time of
confiscation/seizure to the receipt in the
forensic laboratory to safekeeping to
presentation in court for destruction.
The rule is to ensure that there will be no
substitution of the very dangerous drugs
confiscated from he accused at the time that
they were presented to court.
*Inventory in warrantless seizures the officer
may transport the drugs to the nearest police
office.
ARTICLE 200 – GRAVE SCANDAL
*Elements:
1. That the offender performs an act or
act.
2. That such act or acts are highly
scandalous as offending against
decency or good customs.
3. That the highly scandalous conduct is
not expressly falling within any other
article of this code.
4. That the act or acts complained of be
committed in a public place or within
the public knowledge or view.
-Public place – not necessary to have been
witnessed by one or more persons.
-Public knowledge/view – witnessed by one or
two persons.
*Crime of last resort.
*Section 25 – Positive finding for the use of
dangerous drugs shall be qualifying
aggravating
circumstance.
(Special
aggravating?)
*Section 26 – Attempt or conspiracy
- Any attempt or conspiracy of any of the
following acts shall be punished already by
penalty prescribed by law:
1. Importation of any dangerous drugs;
2. Sale, trading, administration, delivery,
distribution,
transportation
of
dangerous drugs;
3. Maintenance of a den, dive or resort
where any dangerous drugs is used in
any form;
4. Manufacture of any dangerous drugs;
5. Cultivation or culture plants which are
the sources of dangerous drugs.
*Section 98 – Provisions of the Revised Penal
Code shall not apply to the provisions of
RA9165 – except when the offender is a minor.
ARTICLE 201 – IMMORAL DOCTRINES,
OBSCENE PUBLICATIONS AND EXHIBITIONS,
AND INDECENT SHOWS
*Acts punished:
1. Public proclamation of doctrines openly
contrary to public morals;
2. Publication of obscene literature;
3. The exhibition of indecent shows, plays,
scenes or acts in fairs, theaters, cinema
or any other places;
4. Selling, giving away or exhibiting films,
engraving sculptures or literature,
which are offensive to public morals.
*Committed only when there is publicity.
*Moral – implies conformity with the generally
accepted standards of goodness or rightness in
conduct or character.
*The author of obscene literature is liable only
when it is published with his knowledge.
ARTICLE 195 -199 – REPEALED BY PD 1602
35
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Obscene – something offensive to chastity,
decency or delicacy. (US vs. Kottinger)
*Test of obscenity – whether the tendency of
the matter charged as obscene, is to deprive or
corrupt those whose minds are open to such
immoral influences, and into whose hands such
as publication may fall, whether or not such
publication or act shocks the ordinary and
common sense of men as an indecency. (US vs.
Kottinger)
*Mere nudity in picture and paintings, not an
obscenity.
*Proper test as regard such pictures:
1. Whether the motive of the picture, as
indicated by it, is pure or impure.
2. Whether it is naturally calculated to excite
impure imaginations.
*Mere possession of obscene materials is not
punishable – without intention to sell, exhibit or
give them away.
*Pictures with slight degree of obscenity, not
used for arts sake but for commercial purposes,
fall under this article.
ARTICLE 202 – VAGRANTS AND PROSTITUTES
*Vagrancy has been decriminalized by RA10158.
We no longer have the crime of vagrancy. No
person can longer be prosecuted for being a
vagrant.
*Prostitute – are women who habitually indulge
in (1) sexual intercourse or (2) lascivious
conduct, for money or profit.
RA 9208 – THE ANTI-TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
ACT OF 2003
*Trafficking in persons – refers to the
recruitment transportation, transfer or
harboring, or receipt of persons with or without
the i ti ’s k o ledge o o se t, ithi o
across national borders by means of threat or
use of force, or other forms of coercion,
abduction, fraud, deception, abuse of power or
of position, taking advantage of the
vulnerability of the person, or the giving or
receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the
consent of a person having control over another
person for the purpose of exploitation which
includes at a minimum the exploitation or the
prostitution of others or other forms of sexual
exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery,
involuntary servitude or the removal or sale of
organs.
*Qualified trafficking in Persons:
a. When the trafficked person is a child.
b. Inter-country adoption.
c. When committed by a syndicate, or in
large scale.
d. Offender is an ascendant, parent,
sibling, guardian or a person who
exercise authority over the trafficked
person or by public officer or employee.
e. When the trafficked person is recruited
to engage in prostitution with any
members of the military or law
enforcement agencies.
f. When the offender is a member of the
military or law enforcement agencies.
g. The offender party dies, becomes
insane, suffers mutilation or is afflicted
with HIV or AIDS.
*Syndicate – if carried out by a group of 3 or
more persons conspiring or confederating with
another.
*Large scale – if committed against 3 or more
persons individually or a group.
*Any person who has personal knowledge of
the commission of any offense under this act,
the trafficked persons, the parent, spouse,
siblings, children, or legal guardian may file a
complaint for trafficking.
*Trafficking cases under this act shall prescribe
in 10 years – if committed by syndicate or in
large scale 20 years.
36
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Prescriptive period shall commence to run
from the day on which the trafficked person is
delivered a released from the conditions of
bondage.
-Shall be interrupted by the filing of complaint.
-shall commence to run again when such
proceedings terminate without the accused
being convicted or acquitted.
*Elements:
ARTICLE 203 – WHO ARE PUBLIC OFFICERS
ARTICLE 205 – JUDGMENT
THROUGH NEGLIGENCE
1. That the offender is a judge.
2. That he renders a judgment in a case
submitted to him for decision.
3. That the judgment is unjust.
4. That the judge knows that his judgment
is unjust.
RENDERED
*To be a public officer, one must be:
*Elements:
1. Taking part in the performance of
public functions in the government or
performing in said document or in any
of its branches, public duties as an
employee, agent or subordinate official,
of any rank or class.
2. That his authority to take part in the
performance of public functions or to
perform public duties must be –
a. By direct provision of the law
b. By popular election
c. By appointment by competent
authority
*Government laborer is not a public officer. –
But temporary performance of public functions
by a laborer makes him a public officer.
*Misfeasance – Improper performance of some
act which might lawfully done.
*Malfeasance – Performance of some act which
ought
not
to
be
done.
*Nonfeasance – omission of some act which
ought to be performed.
204 – 212 KULANG NOTES. EDIT.
ANTI-GRAFT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT –
RA 3019
ANTI-PUNDER ACT – RA 7080
ARTICLE 204 KNOWINGLY RENDERING UNJUST
JUDGMENT
1. That the offender is a judge.
2. That he renders a judgment in case
submitted to him for decision.
3. That the judgment is manifestly unjust.
4. Due to his unreasonable negligence or
ignorance.
ARTICLE 206 – UNJUST INTERLOCUTORY
ORDER
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a judge.
2. That he performs any of the following
acts:
a. Knowingly
renders
unjust
interlocutory orders or decree.
b. Renders a manifestly unjust
interlocutory orders or decree
through inexcusable negligence
or ignorance.
ARTICLE 207 – MALICIOUS DELAY IN THE
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
*Elements:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the offender is a judge.
That there is a proceeding in the court.
He delays the administration of justice.
That the delay is malicious, that is, the
delay is caused by the judge with
37
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
deliberate intent to inflict damage on
either of the party.
ARTICLE 211 – INDIRECT BRIBERY
*Elements:
ARTICLE 208 – PROSECUTION OF OFFENSES,
NEGLIGENCE AND TOLERANCE
*Acts punished:
1. Maliciously refraining from instituting
prosecution against violation of the law.
2. By
maliciously
tolerating
the
commission of offense.
ARTICLE 209 – BETRAYAL OF TRUST BY AN
ATTORNEY OR SOLICITOR
*Acts punished:
1. By causing damage to his client, either
(1) by any malicious breach of
professional duty, or (2) inexcusable
negligence or ignorance.
2. By revealing any of the secrets of his
client learned by him.
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he accepts gift.
3. Gifts are offered to him by reason of his
office.
ARTICLE 211-A – QUALIFIED BRIBERY
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer
entrusted with law enforcement.
2. That the offender refrains from
arresting or prosecuting an offender
who has committed crime punishable
by reclusion perpetua or death.
3. That the offender refrains from
arresting or prosecuting an offender in
consideration of any promise, gift or
present.
ARTICLE 210 – DIRECT BRIBERY
ARTICLE 212 – CORRUPTION OF PUBLIC
OFFICER
*Elements:
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That the offender accepts an offer or
promise or receives a gift or present by
himself or through another.
3. That such offer:
a. With a view to committing
some crime.
b. In
consideration
of the
execution of an act which does
not constitute a crime but the
act must be unlawful.
c. In refraining from doing
something which is his official
duty to do.
4. That the act which the offender agrees
to perform or which he executes be
connected with the performance of his
official duty.
1. That the offender makes offer or
promise or gives gift or present to a
public officer.
2. That the offer or promise are made or
the gifts or presents given to a public
officer, under circumstances that will
make the public officer liable for direct
bribery or indirect bribery.
ARTICLE 213 – FRAUDS AGAINST THE PUBLIC
TREASURY AND SIMILAR OFFENSES
*Acts punished:
1. By entering into an agreement with any
interested party or speculator or
making use of any other scheme, to
defraud the Government in dealing with
any person with regard to furnishing
38
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
supplies, the making of contracts, or the
adjustment or settlement of accounts
relating to public property or funds.
2. By demanding, directly or indirectly, the
payment of sums different from or
larger than those authorized by law, in
the collection of taxes, licenses, fees
and other imposts.
3. By failing voluntary to issue a receipt,
as provided by law, for any sum of
money collected by him officially, in the
collection of taxes, licenses, fees and
other imposts.
4. By collecting or receiving, directly or
indirectly, of payment or otherwise,
things or objects of a nature different
from that provided by law, in the
collection of taxes, licenses, fees and
other imposts.
*Elements of frauds against public treasury:
1. That the offender is a public officer
entrusted with the collection of taxes,
licenses, fees and other imposts.
2. That he is guilty of any of the following
acts or omission –
a. Demanding,
directly
or
indirectly, the payment of sums
different from or larger than
those authorized by law.
b. Failing voluntarily to issue a
receipt, as provided by law, for
any sum of money collected by
him officially.
c. Collecting or receiving, directly
or indirectly, by way of
payment or otherwise, things or
object of a nature different
from that provided by law.
*Mere demand for larger or different amount is
sufficient to consummate the crime.
1. That the offender be a public officer.
2. That he should have taken advantage of
his office, that is, he intervened in the
transaction in his official capacity.
3. That he entered into an agreement with
any interested party or speculator or
made use of any other scheme with
regard to (1) furnishing supplies, (2) the
making of contracts, or (3) the
adjustment or settlement of accounts
relating to public property or funds.
4. That the accused had intent to defraud
the government.
*Collecting officer must issue official receipts –
without it he is liable of illegal exaction.
*The public officer must act in his official
capacity.
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he takes advantage of his position.
3. That he commits any of the frauds or
deceits enumerated in articles 315-318.
*The crime of fraud against public treasury is
consummated by merely entering into an
agreement with any interested party or
speculator or by merely making use of any
other scheme to defraud the government.
*When there is deceit in demanding greater
fees than those prescribed by law, the crime
committed is estafa and not illegal exaction.
*Article 213 is not applicable if the offender is
an officer or employee of BIR or BOC.
ARTICLE 214 – OTHER FRAUDS
*Elements:
*Articles 315 – 318 are estafa, other forms of
swindling, swindling minor, and other deceit.
ARTICLE 215 – PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS
*Elements of illegal exactions:
*Elements:
39
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
1. That the offender is an appointive
public officer.
2. That he becomes interested, directly or
indirectly, in any transaction of
exchange or speculation.
3. That the transaction takes place within
the territory subject to his jurisdiction.
4. That he becomes interested in the
transaction during his incumbency.
*The transaction must be one of exchange or
speculate.
*Purchasing of stocks or shares in a company is
simply an investment and is not a violation of
this article. – But buying regularly securities for
resale is speculation.
2. That he has the custody or control of
funds or property by reason of the
duties of his office.
3. Those funds or property were public
funds or property for which he was
accountable.
4. He appropriated took, misappropriated
or consented, or through abandonment
or negligence, permitted another
person to take them.
*Offender is an accountable officer – is an
officer in the course of the performance of his
duties receives funds or property from the
government which he has the obligation to
account later.
*Punishable act:
ARTICLE 216 – POSSESSION OF PROHIBITED
INTEREST BY PUBLIC OFFICERS
*Persons liable:
1. Public officers who, directly or
indirectly, became interested in any
contract or business in which it was his
official duty to intervene.
2. Experts, arbitrators, and private
accountants who, in like manner, took
part in any contract or transaction
connected with the estate or property
in the appraisal distribution of
adjudication of which they had acted.
3. Guardians and executors with respect
to the property belonging to their
wards or the estate.
*Actual fraud is not necessary.
*Intervention must be by virtue of public office
held.
ARTICLE 217 – MALVERSATION OF PUBLIC
FUNDS OR PROPERTY
*Elements:
1. Offender is
employee.
a
public
officer
1. Appropriating public funds or property.
2. Taking or misappropriating the same.
3. Consenting, through abandonment or
negligence, permitting any other person
to take such public funds.
4. Being otherwise guilty of the
misappropriation or malversation of
such funds or property.
*Malversation of public funds and property can
be committed either:
1. Positive act – through deliberate intent
or through dolo, he is the one who
appropriates or misappropriates, who
took the said public funds or property.
2. Passive act – through abandonment or
negligent, or culpa, he allowed others
to appropriate or misappropriate the
said public funds or property.
*There is prima facie presumption of
malversation – when demand is made by duly
authorized officer to an accountable public
officer to account for public funds or property,
and the same is not forthcoming. –
or
40
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
a. The public officer indeed receives the
public funds or property. That is, he is
an accountable public officer.
b. The said public funds and property was
missing, or there was a shortage, or he
cannot produce it.
c. The said public officer cannot give a
justifiable reason, a legal excuse for the
said shortage or missing of public funds
or property.
*When a public officer had no authority to
receive the money the government and upon
receipt of the same he misappropriates it, the
crime committed is estafa and not
malversation.
*A public officer having only a qualified charge
of government property without authority to
part with physical possession of it unless upon
order from his immediate superior, cannot be
held liable for malversation.
*Even private parties who participate as coperpetrators in the offense of malversation
could be penalized for the commission of such
crime.
*The provision of article 217 shall apply to
article 222 when –
1. Private individuals who. In any capacity
whatsoever, have charge of national, provincial
or municipal funds, revenue or property.
2. Any administrator or depositor of funds or
property attached, seized or deposited by
public authority.
*Test to determine negligence – did the
defendant in doing the alleged negligent act use
that reasonable care and caution which an
ordinary prudent person would have used in
the same situation, if not, guilty of negligence.
ARTICLE 218 – FAILURE OF ACCOUNTABLE
OFFICER TO RENDER ACCOUNTS
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer,
whether in the service or separated
therefrom.
2. That he must be an n accountable
officer for public funds or property.
3. That he is required by law or regulation
to render accounts to the commission
on audit, or to a provincial auditor.
4. That he fails to do so for a period of 2
months after such accounts should be
rendered.
*Demand for accounting is not necessary.
*Misappropriation is not necessary.
ARTICLE 219 – FAILURE OF A RESPONSIBLE
PUBLIC OFFICER TO RENDER ACCOUNTS
BEFORE LEAVING THE COUNTRY
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he must be an accountable officer
for public funds and property.
3. That he must have unlawfully left (or be
on the point of leaving) the Philippines
without securing from the commission
on audit a certificate showing that his
accounts have been finally settled.
*The act of leaving the country must be
unauthorized or not permitted by law.
ARTICLE 220 – ILLEGAL USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS
OR PROPERTY (TECHNICAL MALVERSATION)
*Elements:
*Return of funds malversed is only mitigating.
*When the shortage is paid by public officer
from his pocket, he is not liable for
malversation.
*Demand not necessary in malversation.
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. There is public fund or property under
his administration.
41
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
3. Such public fund or property has been
appropriated by law or ordinance.
4. That he applies the same to a public use
other than that for which such fund or
property has been appropriated by law
or ordinance.
by public authority, even if such
property belongs to a private individual.
ARTICLE 223 – CONNIVING
CONSENTING TO EVASION
WITH
OR
*Elements:
*There is no technical malversation if there is
no a law or ordinance appropriating public fund
or property for a particular purpose.
*Technical malversation is not included in nor
does it necessarily include the crime of
malversation of public funds.
ARTICLE 221 – FAILURE TO MAKE DELIVERY OF
FUNDS OR PROPERTY
*Acts punished:
1. By failing to make payment by a public
officer who is under obligation to make
such payment from government funds
in his possession.
2. By refusing to make delivery by a public
officer who has been ordered by
competent authority to deliver any
property in his custody or under his
administration.
*Elements of failure to make payment:
1. The public officer has government
funds in his possession.
2. He is under obligation to make payment
from such funds.
3. He fails to make the payment
maliciously.
*Private individuals who may be liable under
217-221 –
1. Private individuals who, in any capacity
whatever, have charge of any national,
provincial or municipal funds, revenue
or property.
2. Administrator or depository funds or
property, attached, seized or deposited
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he had in his custody or charge, a
prisoner either detention prisoner or
prisoner by final judgment.
3. That such prisoner escaped from his
custody.
4. That he was in connivance with the
prisoner in the latter escape.
*Connivance with the prisoner in his escape is
an indispensable element of the offense.
*Classes of prisoners involved –
- Fugitive sentenced by final judgment.
- Fugitive only as detention prisoner for any
crime or violation of law or municipal
ordinance.
*A detention prisoner is a person in legal
custody, arrested for, and charged with, some
crime or public offense.
*Release of detention prisoner who could not
be delivered to the judicial authority within the
time fixed by law, is not infidelity in the custody
of prisoner.
*Leniency or laxity is not infidelity.
*Relaxation of imprisonment is considered
infidelity.
ARTCILE
224
NEGLIGENCE
–
EVASION
THROUGH
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he is charged with the conveyance
or custody of a prisoner, either
42
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
detention prisoner or prisoner by final
judgment.
3. That such prisoner escapes through his
negligence.
*What is punished in evasion thru negligence is
such a definite laxity as all but amounts to
deli e ate o -pe fo a e of dut o the
part of the guard. – Not every negligence or
distraction of a guard is penalized.
4. That damage, whether serious or not,
to a third party or to the public interest
should have been caused.
*The document must be complete and one by
which a right could be established or an
obligation could be extinguished.
ARTICLE 227 – OFFICER BREAKING SEAL
*Elements:
*The fact that the public officer recaptured the
prisoner who had escaped from his custody
does not afford complete exculpation.
ARTICLE 225 – ESCAPE OF PRISONER UNDER
THE CUSTODY OF A PERSON NOT A PUBLIC
OFFICER
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he is charged with the custody of
papers or property.
3. That these papers or property are
sealed by proper authority.
4. That he breaks the seal or permits them
to be broken.
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a private person.
2. That the conveyance or custody of a
prisoner or person under arrest is
confided to him.
3. That the prisoner or person under
arrest escapes.
4. That the offender consents to the
escape of the prisoner or person under
arrest, or that the escape takes place
through his negligence.
*Crime is committed by breaking or permitting
seal to be broken.
*Damage or intent to cause damage is not
necessary.
*The opening of public papers by breaking seals
should be done only by the proper authority.
ARTICLE 228
DOCUMENTS
–
OPENING
OF
CLOSED
*Elements:
*Article 225 is not applicable if a private person
was the one who made the arrest and he
consented to the escape of the person he
arrested.
ARTICLE 226 – REMOVAL, CONCEALMENT OR
DESTRUCTION OF DOCUMENT
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That any closed papers, documents or
objects are entrusted to his custody.
3. That he opens or permits to be opened
said closed papers, documents or
objects.
4. That he does not have proper authority.
*Elements:
1. That the offender be a public officer.
2. That he obstructs, destroys or conceals
documents or papers.
3. That the said documents or papers
should have been entrusted to such
public officer by reason of his office.
*Custody – guarding or safekeeping.
*Closed document must be entrusted to the
custody of the accused by reason of his office.
ARTICLE 229 – REVELATION OF SECRETS BY AN
OFFICER
43
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Acts punishable:
1. By revealing any secrets known to the
offending public officer by reason of his
official capacity.
2. By delivering wrongfully papers or
copies of papers of which he may have
charge and which should not be
published.
*Elements of 1st act:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. He knows of secret by reason of his
official capacity.
3. He reveals such secrets without
authority or justifiable reasons.
4. That damage, great or small, be caused
to the public interest.
ARTICLE 231 – OPEN DISOBEDIENCE
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a judicial or
executive officer.
2. That there is a judgment, decision or
order of a superior authority.
3. That such judgment, decision or order
was made within the scope of the
jurisdiction of the superior authority
and issued with all the legal formalities.
4. That the offender without any legal
justification openly refuses to execute
the said judgment, decision or order
which he is duty bond to obey.
ARTICLE 232 – DISOBEDIENCE TO ORDER OF
SUPERIOR OFFICER, WHEN SAID ORDER WAS
SUSPENDED BY INFERIOR OFFICER
*Elements of 2nd act:
*Elements:
1.
2.
3.
4.
That the offender is a public officer.
He has charge of papers.
Those papers should not be published.
He delivers those papers or copies
thereof to a third person.
5. The delivery is wrongful.
6. Damage be cause to public interest.
ARTICLE 230 – PUBLIC OFFICER REVEALING
SECRETS OF PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he knows of the secret of a private
individual by reason of his office.
3. That he reveals such secrets without
authority or justifiable reason.
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That an order is issued by his superior
for execution.
3. That he has for any reason suspended
the execution of such order.
4. That his superior disapproves the
suspension of the execution of the
order.
5. That the offender disobeys his superior
despite the disapproval of the
suspension.
*This article does not apply if the order of the
superior is illegal.
ARTICLE 233 – REFUSAL OF ASSISTANCE
*Elements:
*Revelation to one person is sufficient.
*Article 230 is not applicable when the offender
is an attorney at law or a solicitor but article
209.
*Damage to private individuals not necessary.
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That a competent authority demands
from the offender that he lend his
cooperation towards the administration
of justice or other public service.
44
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
3. That the offender fails to do so
maliciously.
some information from the
prisoner.
*Damage to public interest or to a third party is
essential.
*Offender may also be liable for physical
injuries or damage caused, no complex –
separate.
ARTICLE 234 – REFUSAL TO DISCHARGE
ELECTIVE OFFICE
ARTICLE 236 – ANTICIPATION OF DUTIES OF A
PUBLIC OFFICE
*Elements:
*Elements:
1. That the offender is elected by popular
election to a public office.
2. That he refuses to be sworn in or to
discharge the duties of said office.
3. That there is no legal motive for such
refusal to be sworn in or to discharge
the duties of said office.
*Shall refuse without legal motives.
*Article 234 is not applicable to appointive
officer.
1. That the offender is entitled to hold a
public office or employment, either by
election or appointment.
2. That the law requires that he should
first be sworn in and/or should first give
a bond.
3. That he assumes the performance of
the duties and powers of such office.
4. That he has not taken his oath of office
and/or given the bond required by law.
ARTICLE 235 – MALTREATMENT OF PRISONERS
ARTICLE 237 – PROLONGING PERFORMANCE
OF DUTIES AND POWERS
*Elements:
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer or
employee.
2. That he has under his charge a prisoner
or detention prisoner.
3. That he maltreats such prisoner in
either of the following manners:
a. By overdoing himself in the
correction or handling of a
prisoner or detention prisoner
under his charge either –
i. By the imposition of
punishments
not
authorized
by
the
regulation, or
ii. By
inflicting
such
punishment in a cruel
and
humiliating
manner; or
b. By maltreating such prisoner to
extort a confession or to obtain
1. That the offender is holding a public
office.
2. That the period provided by law,
regulation or special provision for
holding such, has already expired.
3. That he continues to exercise the duties
and powers of such office.
ARTICLE 238 – ABANDONMENT OF OFFICE OR
POSITION
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he formally resigns from his
position.
3. That his resignation has not yet been
accepted.
4. That he abandons his office to the
detriment of the public service.
45
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 239 – USURPATION OF LEGISLATIVE
POWERS
*Elements:
1. That the offender is an executive or
judicial officer.
2. That he (a) makes general rules or
regulations beyond the scope of his
authority, or (b) attempts to repeal a
law or (c) suspends the execution
thereof.
ARTICLE 240 – USURPATION OF EXECUTIVE
FUNCTIONS
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That a proceeding is pending before
such public officer.
3. That there is a question brought before
the proper authorities regarding his
jurisdiction, which is not yet decided.
4. That he has been lawfully required to
refrain from continuing the proceeding.
5. That he continues the proceedings.
ARTICLE 243 – ORDERS OR REQUESTS BY
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS TO ANY JUDICIAL
AUTHORITY
*Elements:
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a judge.
2. That he (a) assumes a power pertaining
to the executive authorities or (b)
obstructs the executive authorities in
the lawful exercise of their powers.
*Legislative officers are not liable for usurpation
of powers – usurpation of public office.
ARTICLE 241 – USURPATION OF JUDICIAL
FUNCTIONS
*Elements:
1. That the offender is an officer of the
executive branch of the Government.
2. That he (a) assumes judicial powers, or
(b) obstructs the execution of any order
or decision rendered by any judge
within his jurisdiction.
*Article 239-241 punishes interference by
officers of one of the three departments of
government with function of officers of another
department.
ARTICLE 242 – DISOBEYING REQUEST FOR
DISQUALIFICATION
*Elements:
1. That the offender is an executive
officer.
2. That he addresses any order or
suggestion to any judicial authority.
3. That the order or suggestion relates to
any case or business coming within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the court of
justice.
ARTICLE 244 – UNLAWFUL APPOINTMENTS
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he nominates or appoints a person
to a public officer.
3. That such person lacks the legal
qualification thereof.
4. That the offender knows that his
nominee or appointee lacks the
qualification at the time he made the
nomination or appointment.
ARTICLE 245 – ABUSES AGAINST CHASTITY
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a public officer.
2. That he solicits or make immoral or
indecent advances to a woman.
3. That such woman must be –
46
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
a. Interested in matters pending
before the offender for
decision, or with respect to
which he is required to submit a
report to or consult with a
superior officer;
b. Under the custody of the
offender who is a warden or
other public officer directly
charged with the care and
custody of prisoners or person
under arrest;
c. The wife, daughter, sister or
relative within the same degree
by affinity of the person in the
custody of the offender.
*Solicit – propose earnest and persistently
something unchaste and immoral to woman.
*The crime of abuse against chastity is
consummated by mere proposal.
*Father, mother or child – whether legitimate
or illegitimate.
*Ascendant, descendant, or spouse – must be
legitimate.
*Illegitimate – embraces all children born out of
wedlock.
*The child should not be less than 3 days old –
infanticide.
*Only relatives by blood and in direct line,
except spouse, are considered in parricide.
- Siblings – collateral line – not included in
parricide.
*Therefore, an adopted father or adopted sons
are not included in this provision.
*There is parricide through reckless imprudence
and parricide by mistake.
AMLA
*Stranger who cooperates and takes part in the
commission of the crime of parricide is not
guilty of parricide but only homicide or murder
as the case may be.
ARTICLE 246 – PARRICIDE
*Relationship between the offended party and
the offender must be stated in the information.
*Elements:
1. That a person is killed.
2. That the deceased is killed by the
accused.
3. That the deceased is the father, mother
or child whether legitimate or
illegitimate, or a legitimate other
ascendants or other descendant, or the
legitimate spouse of the accused.
*Relationship of the offender with the victim is
the essential element of this crime.
*Parents and children are not included in the
te
as e da ts o des e da ts .
ARTICLE 247 – DEATH OR PHYSICAL INJURIES
INFLICTED
UNDER
EXCEPTIONAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
*Elements:
1. That a legally married person or a
parent surprises his spouse or daughter,
the latter under 18 years of age and
living with him, in the act of committing
sexual intercourse with another person.
2. That he or she kills any or both, of them
or inflicts upon any of them any serious
physical injury in the act or immediately
thereafter.
3. That he has not promoted or facilitate
the prostitution of his wife or daughter,
or that he or she has not consented to
the infidelity of the other spouse.
47
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Article 247 does not define and penalize a
felony.
*The accused must be legally married person.
*Parent may not be legitimate, it requires only
(1) that the daughter be less than 18 years old,
and (2) that she is living with her parents.
*Surprise – to come upon suddenly and
unexpectedly.
*Surprising the spouse or young daughter in the
act of sexual intercourse, indispensable
requisite – not before, not after.
*Article 247 is not applicable when the accused
did not see his spouse in the act of sexual
intercourse with another person.
*Sexual intercourse does not include
preparatory acts (According to J. Laurel mali
daw mga justices nagtampo.)
*The killing or inflicting of serious physical
injuries must be:
1. In the act of sexual intercourse.
2. Immediately thereafter. – there must
not be lapse of time between the
surprising and killing (must be a
continuing process)
*The killing must be the direct by-product of
the accused rage.
*Justification of article 247 – considers the
spouse or parent as acting in a justified burst of
passion.
*If he shall inflict upon them physical injuries of
any other kind, he shall be exempt from
punishment.
ARTICLE 248 – MURDER
1. That a person was killed.
2. That the accused killed him.
3. That the killing was attended by any of
the qualifying circumstances mentioned
in article 248.
4. That the killing is not parricide or
infanticide.
*Qualifying circumstances –
1. Treachery, taking advantage of superior
strength, with the aid of armed men, or
employing means to weaken the
defense, or of means or persons to
insure or afford impunity.
2. In consideration of price, reward or
promise.
3. By means of inundation, fire, poison,
explosion, shipwreck, stranding of
vessel, derailment or assault upon a
railroad, fall of an airship, by means of
motor vehicles, or with the use of any
other means involving great waste and
ruin.
4. On occasion of any calamities, or of an
earthquake, eruption of a volcano,
destructive cyclone, epidemic or any
other public calamities.
5. With evident premeditation.
6. With cruelty, by deliberately and
inhumanly augmenting the suffering of
the victim or outraging or scoffing at his
person or corpse.
*In murder, the victim must be killed to
consummate the crime.
*The offender must have intent to kill.
*Murder will exist with only one of the
circumstances described in article 248.
*When more than one of said circumstances
are present, the other must be considered as
generic aggravating.
*Elements:
48
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*When the other circumstances are absorbed
or included in one qualifying circumstance, they
cannot be considered as generic aggravating.
*Any of the qualifying circumstances
enumerated in article 248 must be alleged in
the information to qualify the crime.
*The qualifying circumstances of murder except
out agi g o s offi g at his pe so o o pse ,
are among those defined in article 14.
*Treachery (Alevosia) Paragraph 16 Article 14.
*Elements:
1. That the offender deliberately adopted
the particular means, method or forms
of attack employed by him.
2. That at the time of attack, the victim
was not in position to defend himself.
*Essence of treachery is the suddenness and
unexpectedness of the act to a victim who has
not even the slightest provocation, the victim
must be totally without defense.
*If the victim was able to put out any defense,
no matter how minor, treachery is not present.
*Whenever the offended party is a minor, there
is always treachery because the minor is always
defenseless.
*Taking advantage of superior strength –
means be employed to weaken the defense.
Par. 15 Article 14
*Requisites:
1. That there is a notorious inequality of
forces between the offender and the
offended party in terms of their age,
size and strength.
2. That the offender took advantage of
this inequality of force to facilitate the
commission of the crime.
*With the aid of armed men. Paragraph 8,
Article 14
- The armed men aided the offender in the
commission of the crime. The aid given by the
armed men maybe direct or indirect
participation in the commission of the crime.
*Employing means or persons to insure or
afford impunity. Paragraph 14, Article 14
- When means or persons are employed by the
accused who killed the deceased to prevent his
being recognized or to secure himself against
detection and punishment.
*In consideration of price, reward or promise.
Paragraph 11, Article 14
- Should be considered both against the person
who made the offer and the person who
accepted the price, reward or promise.
- It is necessary that the price, reward or
promise must be the prime reason for the
principal by direct participation to commit the
crime.
*By means of fire, poison, explosion, etc.
Paragraph 12, Article 14
- Treachery and evident premeditation are
inherent in murder by poison.
*With evident premeditation. Paragraph 13,
Article 14
*Requisites:
1. The time when the offender
determined to commit the crime.
2. An act manifestly indicating that the
culprit has clung to his determination.
3. Sufficient lapse of time between the
determination and execution, to allow
him to reflect upon the consequences
of his act.
*With cruelty. Paragraph 21, Article 14
*Elements:
49
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
1. That at the time of the infliction of the
physical pain, the offended party is still
alive.
2. That the offender enjoys and delights in
seeing his victim suffer gradually by the
infliction of the physical pain.
*Without intent – he is only liable for physical
injuries.
*No offense of frustrated and attempted
homicide, through imprudence – the element of
intent to kill is incompatible with negligence or
imprudence.
*Requisites:
1. The injury caused be deliberately
increased by causing other wrong.
2. The other wrong be unnecessary for the
execution of the purpose of the
offender.
*Outraging or scoffing at the person or corpse
of the victim
*Use of unlicensed firearm is an aggravating
circumstance in homicide/murder.
- Crime is no longer qualified illegal possession,
but murder or homicide, as the case may be.
*Accidental homicide – the death of a person
brought about by a lawful act performed with
proper care and skill, and with homicidal intent.
*Outraging – to commit an extremely vicious or
deeply insulting act.
*Corpus delicti – That a crime was actually
perpetrated and does not refer to the body of
the murdered person.
*Scoffing – to jeer, and implies a showing of
irreverence.
ARTICLE 250 – PENALTY FOR FRUSTRATED
PARRICIDE, HOMICIDE OR MORDER
ARTICLE 249 – HOMICIDE
-Courts may impose a penalty two degrees
lower for frustrated.
-Three degrees for attempted.
*Elements:
1. That a person was killed.
2. That the accused killed him without any
justifying circumstances.
3. That the accused had the intention to
kill, which is presumed.
4. That the killing was not attended by any
of the qualifying circumstances of
murder, or by that of parricide or
infanticide.
*The penalty when the victim of homicide is
under 12 years of age – reclusion perpetua –
one degree higher.
*Intent to kill is conclusively presumed when
death resulted.
*Evidence of intent to kill is important only in
attempted or frustrated homicide.
ARTICLE 251 – DEATH
TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY
CAUSED
IN
A
*Elements:
1. That there be several persons.
2. That they did not compose groups
organized for the common purpose of
assaulting and attacking each other
reciprocally.
3. That these several persons quarreled
and assaulted one another in a
confused and tumultuous manner.
4. That someone was killed in the course
of the affray.
5. That it cannot be ascertained who
actually killed the deceased.
6. That the person or persons who
inflicted serious physical injuries or who
used violence can be identified.
50
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Tumultuous affray exist when at least four
persons took part.
*Tumultuous – more than 3 persons who are
armed or are provided with means of violence.
*When there are two identified group of men
who assaulted each other, then there is no
tumultuous affray.
*The person killed in the course of the affray
need not be one of the participants in the
affray.
4. That all those who appear to have used
violence upon the person of the
offended party are known.
*The injured in the crime of physical injuries
inflicted in a tumultuous affray must be one or
some of the participants in the affray.
*Penalty is one degree lower than that for
physical injury inflicted – persons who used
violence.
*Slight physical injuries are not included.
ARTICLE 253 – GIVING ASSISTANCE TO SUICIDE
*If the one who inflicted the fatal wound is
known, the crime is not homicide in tumultuous
affray.
*Persons liable for death in tumultuous affray:
1. The person or persons who inflicted the
serious physical injuries.
2. If it is not known who inflicted the
serious physical injuries on the
deceased, all the persons who used
violence upon the person of the victim,
but with lesser liability.
*Those who used violence upon the person of
the victim are liable for death caused in
tumultuous affray only if it cannot be
determined who inflicted the serious physical
injuries on the deceased.
ARTICLE 252 – PHYSICAL INJURIES INFLICTED IN
A TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY
*Elements:
1. That there is tumultuous affray as
referred to in the preceding article.
2. That a participant or some participants
thereof suffer serious physical injuries
or less serious physical injuries.
3. That the person responsible thereof
cannot be identified.
*Acts punished:
1. By assisting another to commit suicide,
whether the suicide is consummated or
not.
2. By lending his assistance to another to
commit suicide to the extent of doing
the killing himself.
*A person who attempts to commit suicide is
not criminally liable.
*In order to incur criminal liability for the result
not intended (Article 4 paragraph 1), one must
be committing a felony. – (Intentional felony.?)
*Assistance to suicide is different from mercykilling.
*Mercy killing is the practice of painlessly
putting to death a person suffering from some
incurable decease – liable for murder or
parricide – the person killed does not want to
die.
ARTICLE 254 – DISCHARGE OF FIREARMS
*Elements:
1. That the offender discharges a firearm
against or at another person.
51
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
2. That the offender has no intention to
kill that person.
*The act constituting the offense is shooting at
another with any firearm, without intent to kill
him.
*Firing a gun against the house of the offended
party at random, not knowing in what part of
the house the people inside were is only alarms
under article 155.
of concealing the dishonor. – it is akin to a
privilege mitigating
- Mother – 2 degree lower
- Maternal grandparents – 1 degree lower
*Delinquent mother who claims concealing
dishonor must be of good reputation.
*No crime of infanticide is committed where
the child was born dead, or although born alive,
it could not sustain an independent life when it
was killed.
*There must be no intention to kill.
ARTICLE 256 – INTENTIONAL ABORTION
*The purpose of the offender is only to
intimidate or frighten the offended party.
*If in the illegal discharge of firearm, the
offended party is hit and wounded, there is a
complex crime of discharge of firearm with
physical injuries when the physical injuries are
serious or less serious.
*The crime is discharge of firearm, even if the
gun was not pointed at the offended party
when it fired, as long as it was initially aimed by
the accused at or against the offended party.
ARTICLE 255 – INFANTICIDE
*Elements:
1. That a child was killed.
2. That the deceased child was less than
three days of age (72hours)
3. That the accused killed the said child.
*Infanticide – the killing of any child less than
three days of age, whether the killer is the
parent or grandparent, any other relative of the
child, or a stranger.
*The penalty is that for parricide or murder, but
the name of the crime is always infanticide.
*Ways of committing intentional abortion:
1. By using any violence upon the person
of the pregnant woman.
2. By acting, but without using violence,
without consent of the woman.
3. By acting, with the consent of the
pregnant woman.
*Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman.
2. That violence is exerted, or drugs or
beverages administered, or that the
accused otherwise acts upon such
pregnant woman.
3. That as a result of the use of violence or
drugs or beverages upon her, or any
other act of the accused, the foetus
dies, either in the womb or after having
been expelled therefrom.
4. That the abortion is intended.
*Abortion – the willful killing of the foetus in
the uterus, or the violent expulsion of the
foetus from the maternal womb which results
in the death of the foetus.
*In abortion, the foetus may be over or less
than six months old.
*The mother and maternal grandparents of the
child are entitled to the mitigating circumstance
52
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*The person who intentionally caused the
abortion and the woman if she consented, are
liable.
c. Any of her parents, with her
consent for the purpose of
concealing her dishonor.
*If the foetus could sustain an independent life,
after its separation from maternal womb, and it
is killed, the crime is infanticide.
*The other person who caused the abortion
with her consent is liable under article 256.
*Liability of the pregnant woman is mitigated if
purpose is to conceal dishonor.
ARTICLE 257 – UNINTENTIONAL ABORTION
*Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman.
2. That violence is used upon such
pregnant woman without intending an
abortion.
3. That the violence is intentionally
exerted.
4. That as a result of the violence the
foetus dies, either in the womb or after
having been expelled therefrom.
*Unintentional abortion is committed only by
violence – actual physical force.
*There is
imprudence.
unintentional
abortion
thru
*The crime of abortion, even unintentional, to
be held committed, the accused must have
known the pregnancy (Supreme Court of Spain)
*Ma
e o ple
ith ho i ide, pa i ide…
ARTICLE 258 – ABORTION PRACTICED BY THE
WOMAN HERSELF OR BY HER PARENTS
*No mitigating for parents of pregnant woman
even if the purpose is to conceal dishonor –
unlike in infanticide.
ARTICLE 259 – ABORTION PRACTICED BY A
PHYSICIAN OR MIDWIFE AND DISPOSING OF
ABORTIVES
*Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman who
has suffered an abortion.
2. That the abortion is intended.
3. That the offender, who must be a
physician or midwife, causes or assist in
causing the abortion.
4. That said physician or midwife takes
advantage of his or her scientific
knowledge or skill.
*Elements as to pharmacists:
1. That the offender is a pharmacist.
2. That there is no proper prescription
from a physician.
3. That the offender dispenses any
abortive.
*Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman who
has suffered an abortion.
2. That the abortion is intended.
3. That the abortion is caused by –
a. The pregnant woman herself.
b. Any other person with her
consent.
*It is not necessary that the pharmacist knows
that the abortive would be used to cause an
abortion.
ARTICLE
260
–
RESPONSIBILITY
PARTICIPANTS IN A DUEL
OF
*Acts punished:
1. B killi g o e’s ad e sa
i a duel.
53
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
2. By inflicting upon such adversary
physical injuries.
3. By making a combat although no
physical injuries have been inflicted.
*Duel – formal or regular combat previously
conserted between two parties in the presence
of two or more seconds of lawful age on each
side, who make the selection of arms and fix all
the other conditions of the fight.
1. By intentionally mutilating another by
depriving him, either totally or partially,
of some organs for reproduction.
2. By
intentionally
making
other
mutilation, that is, by lopping or
clipping off any part of the body of the
offended party, other than the essential
organ for reproduction, to deprive him
of that part of his body.
*Elements of the 1st:
*Who are liable in duel –
1. The person who killed or inflicted
physical injuries upon his adversary, or
both combatants in any other case, as
principals.
2. The seconds, as accomplices.
*If death results, the penalty is the same as that
for homicide.
ARTICLE 261 – CHALLENGING TO A DUEL
*Acts punished:
1. By challenging another to a duel.
2. By inciting another to give or accept a
challenge to a duel.
3. By scoffing at or decrying another
publicly for having refused to accept a
challenge to fight a duel.
*A challenge to fight, without contemplating a
duel, is not challenging to a duel.
1. That there be a castration that is,
mutilation of organs necessary for
generation, such as the penis or
ovarium.
2. That the mutilation is caused purposely
and deliberately that is, to deprive the
offended party of some essential organ
for reproduction.
*Mutilation of first kind is castration which
must be made purposely.
*When the victim of other mutilation is less
than 12 years of age the penalty is reclusion
perpetua.
*If the mutilation is not caused purposely and
deliberately so as to deprive the offended party
of a particular part of his body, the case will be
considered as serious physical injuries.
ARTICLE 263 – SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES
*How are serious physical injuries committed:
*Person responsible –
1. Challenger, and
2. Instigators
ARTICLE 262 – MUTILATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
By wounding
By beating
By assaulting
By administering injurious substances
*Mutilation – the lopping or the clipping off of
some part of the body.
*May be committed by reckless imprudence, or
by simple imprudence or negligence.
*Two kinds of mutilation:
*What are serious physical injuries:
54
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
1. When the injured person becomes
insane, imbecile, impotent or blind in
consequence of the physical injuries
inflicted.
2. When the injured person (a) loses the
use of speech or the power to hear or
to smell, or loses an eye, a hand, a foot,
an arm, or a leg, or (b) loses the use of
any such member, or (c) becomes
incapacitated for the work in which he
was therefore habitually engaged, in
consequence of the physical injuries
inflicted.
3. When the person injured (a) becomes
deformed, or (b) loses any member of
his body, or (c) loses the use thereof, or
(d) becomes ill or incapacitated for the
performance of the work in which he
was habitually engaged for more than
90 days, in consequence of the physical
injuries inflicted.
4. When the injured person becomes ill or
incapacitated for labor for more than
30 days (but not more than 90 days) as
a result of the physical injuries inflicted.
*There must be no intent to kill.
*Paragraph 1
*Impotence – inability to copulate it includes
sterility.
*Blindness – must be two eyes, blindness must
be complete or total blindness.
*Loss of an eye – one eye is sufficient.
*Paragraph 3
*Paragraph 3 covers any member which is not
principal member of the body.
*It is serious physical injury when the offended
party becomes deformed. – Physical ugliness,
permanent and definite abnormality. It must be
conspicuous and visible.
*Deformity requires:
1. Physical ugliness
2. Permanent and definite abnormality
3. Conspicuous and visible
*loss of teeth – if impaired the appearance it is
deformity (loss of tooth. Same same)
*The injury contemplated by the code is an
injury that cannot be repaired by action of
nature.
*Front tooth is a member of the body.
*Loss of power to hear of right ear only is loss
of use of other part of body.
*There is illness for certain period of time,
when the wound inflicted did not heal within
that period.
*Medical attendance is not important in serious
physical injuries.
*Work includes studies or preparation for a
profession.
*Paragraph 2
*Paragraph 4
*It must be loss of power to hear of both ears –
if only one, it is covered under 3rd paragraph.
*Loss of use of hand or incapacity for usual
work must be permanent.
*Paragraph 4 speaks of incapacity for any kind
of labor.
*Injury requiring hospitalization for more than
30 days is serious physical injury.
*All those mentioned in paragraph 2 are
principal members of the body.
55
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*There is no incapacity if the injured party could
still engage in his work although less effective
than before.
4. When the victim is a person of rank or
person in authority, provided the crime
is not direct assault.
*Qualified serious physical injuries if committed
against any person enumerated in parricide or
with the attendance of any circumstances in
murder.
*Medical attendance or incapacity is required in
less serious physical injuries.
*Serious physical injuries by excessive
chastisement by parents are not qualified.
ARTICLE 264 – ADMINISTERING INJURIOUS
SUBSTANCES OR BEVERAGES
*Elements:
*It is only slight physical injuries when there is
no medical attendance or incapacity for labor.
ARTICLE 266 – SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES AND
MALTREATMENT
*3 kinds of slight physical injuries:
1. That the offender inflicted upon
another any serious physical injury.
2. That it was done by knowingly
administering to him any injurious
substances or beverages or by taking
advantage of his weakness of mind or
credulity.
3. That he had no intent to kill.
1. Physical injuries which incapacitated
the offended party for labor from one
to nine days, or required medical
attendance during the same period.
2. Physical injuries which did not prevent
the offended party from engaging in his
habitual work or which did not require
medical attendance.
3. Ill-treatment of another by deed
without causing any injury.
ARTICLE 265 – LESS SERIOUS PHYSICAL
INJURIES
*Some hours after nine days, not amounting to
10 days.
*That the offended party is incapacitated for
labor for 10 days or more (but not more than
30 days) or needs medical attendance for the
same period of time.
-That the physical injuries must not be those
described in the preceding articles.
*In the absence of proof as to the period of the
offe ded pa t ’s i apa it fo la o o of the
required medical attendance – slight physical
injuries only
*Circumstances that will qualify less serious
physical injuries:
1. When there is manifest intent to insult
or offend the injured person.
2. When there is circumstances adding
ignominy to the offense.
3. Whe the i ti
is the offe de ’s
parents,
ascendants,
guardians,
curators or teachers.
*Supervening event converting the crime into
serious physical injuries after the filing of the
information for slight physical injuries can still
be the subject of a new change.
RA 9262 – ANTI-VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
AND THEIR CHILDREN ACT OF 2004
*Any act or a series of acts committed by any
person against a woman who is his wife, former
wife, or against a woman with whom the
person has or had a sexual or dating
relationship, or with whom he has a common
56
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
child whether legitimate or illegitimate within
or without the family abode, which result in or
is likely to result in physical, sexual,
psychological harm or suffering, or economic
abuse including threats of such acts, battery,
assault, coercion, harassment or arbitrary
deprivation of liberty.
*Hazing – An initiation rite or practice which is
used as an admission into membership in any
fraternity or any other organization wherein the
said recruit/neophyte is placed under an
embarrassing or humiliating situations or
subjecting him into psychological or physical
injury or crime.
a. Physical violence – acts that include
bodily or physical harm.
b. Sexual violence – act which is sexual in
nature, committed against a woman or
her child.
c. Psychological violence – acts or
omissions causing or likely to cause
mental or emotional suffering of the
victim.
d. Economic abuse – acts that make or
attempt to make a woman financially
dependent.
*Hazing is allowed provided that the following
requisites are present:
*Dating relationship – a situation wherein the
parties live as husband and wife without the
benefit of marriage or are romantically involved
over time and on a continuing basis during the
course of the relationship.
*If it involves physical abuse, it shall prescribe
after 20 years, if it involves psychological, sexual
and economical abuse, it shall prescribe in 10
years.
*Battered woman syndrome – scientifically
defined pattern of psychological and behavioral
symptoms found in the battering relationship as
a result of cumulative abuse.
*Cycle:
1. Tension building phase
2. Acute battering phase
3. Tranquil loving phase
1. There must be prior written notice sent
to the head of the school authority or
the head off the organization 7 days
before the said initiation rites and their
prior written notice shall contain the
following:
a. It shall indicate the date of the
said initiation rites which shall
not be more than 3 days.
b. It shall indicate/state the name
of the neophytes or applicants
who will undergo the said
hazing or initiation rites.
c. It shall contain an undertaking
which states that there shall be
no physical violence employed
in any form on these
neophytes,
recruits
or
applicants.
2. Upon the receipt of such prior written
notice, the head of the school or
organization shall assign at least 2
representatives from their school or
organization who must be present
during the time of the said initiation
rites or hazing and these 2
representatives shall see to it that no
amount of physical violence shall be
employed on any person or any
neophytes or recruit or applicant during
the said hazing or initiation rites.
*Exempted from both criminal and civil liability.
RA 8049 – ANTI-HAZING LAW
*If in the course of hazing, someone died or
suffered any physical injuries; all of the officers
and members of the said fraternity or
organization who are present and who
57
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
participated in the said initiation rites shall be
liable as principal.
*If the said initiation rites took place in the
house of a member or an officer of the said
fraternity or sorority; the parents of the said
members or officers shall be held liable not as
an accomplice but as principals if they have
such knowledge of the said conduct of the
initiation rites and they did not perform any act
in order to prevent it.
*Any person who is present in the said hazing
shall constitute a prima facie evidence that
there is a participation and shall be held liable
as principal.
*Under RA8049; the defense that such person
has no intention to commit so grave a wrong as
that committed cannot be used by an accused –
it is a prohibited defense.
1. That the offender commits an act of
sexual assault.
2. That the act of sexual assault is
committed by any of the following
means:
a. By inserting his penis into
a othe pe so ’s outh o a al
orifice, or
b. By inserting any instrument or
object into the genital or anal
orifice of another person.
3. That the act of sexual assault is
accomplished under any of the
following circumstances:
a. By using force or intimidation.
b. When the woman is deprived of
reason
or
otherwise
unconscious.
c. By means of fraudulent
machination or grave abuse of
authority.
d. When the woman is under 12
years of age or demented.
ARTICLE 266-A – RAPE
*Rape by carnal knowledge
*Elements of rape under paragraph 1:
1. That the offender is a man.
2. That the offender had carnal knowledge
of a woman.
3. Such act is accomplish under any of the
following circumstances:
a. By using force or intimidation.
b. When the woman is deprived of
reason
or
otherwise
unconscious.
c. By means of fraudulent
machination or grave abuse of
authority.
d. When the woman is under 12
years of age or demented.
*Rape by sexual assault
*Elements of rape under paragraph 2:
*The crime of rape can now be committed by
male or female.
*Rape by sexual intercourse – the contact of
ale’s pe is ith o a ’s agi a. – The
slightest penetration is enough.
-E e if the atta ke ’s pe is e el tou hed the
external portions of the female genitalia were
made in the context of the presence or
existence of an erect penis capable of full
penetration – it consummates rape.
*Touching the labia majora or the labia minora
of the pudemdum consummates rape.
*In sexual intercourse the offender is a man and
the offended party is a woman.
*Statutory rape when the victim is under 12
years of age.
*In case of incestuous rape – force, threat, or
intimidation is not necessary – because of moral
ascendency.
58
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Moral ascendancy or influence, held to
substitute for the element of physical force or
intimidation.
*When the offender in rape has ascendancy on
influence over the girl, it is not necessary that
she put up a determined resistance.
*Sweetheart defense theory will not lie in favor
of the man – it does not mean that when you
are sweethearts, you can no longer rape the
other person.
*No frustrated rape – (People vs. Orita)
*Mere touch of an erected penis on the labia or
lips of a
o a ’s ge italia
ill al ead
consummate rape.
*It is not necessary that there be complete
penetration.
*The finger is within the mean of instrument or
object insofar as rape by sexual assault is
concerned.
*Resistance when futile, does not amount to
consent.
-The test is whether the threat or intimidation
produces a reasonable fear in the mind of the
victim that if she resists or does not yield to the
desires of the accused, the threat would be
carried out.
*Rape by carnal knowledge, penalty is qualified:
1. When rape is committed with the use
of a deadly weapon.
2. When rape is committed by two or
more persons.
3. When by reason or on occasion of rape,
the victim becomes insane.
4. When rape is attempted and homicide
is committed.
*Presumption of resistance – if in the course of
the commission of rape, (1) the said offended
party has performed any acts in any degree
amounting to resistance of rape, or (2) when
the said offended party cannot give a valid
consent.
*Effect of pardon
*In case of rape, pardon will not extinguish the
criminal liability of the offender.
- It may be extinguish through:
1. The offended woman may pardon the
offender through a subsequent valid
marriage, the effect of which would be,
the e ti tio of the offe de ’s lia ility.
2. The legal husband may be pardoned by
forgiveness of the wife provided that
the marriage is not void ab initio.
*Only the principal by direct participation may
afford pardon to the offended party. The other
parties may benefit to the pardon given by the
offended party to the principal.
RA7610 – SPECIAL PROTECTION OF CHILDREN
AGAINST
ABUSE,
EXPLOITATION
AND
DISCRIMINATION ACT
*Article 3 - Child prostitution and other sexual
abuse – children whether male or female, who
for money, profit or other consideration or due
to coercion or influence of any adult syndicate
or group, indulge in sexual intercourse or
lascivious conduct are deemed to be children
exploited in prostitution and other sexual
abuse.
ARTICLE 267 – KIDNAPPING AND SERIOUS
ILLEGAL DETENTION
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a private individual.
2. That he kidnaps or detains another, or
in any other manner deprives the latter
of his liberty.
3. That the act of detention or kidnapping
must be illegal.
59
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
4. That in the commission of the offense,
any of the following circumstances is
present:
a. That
the kidnapping
or
detention lasts for more than 3
days.
b. That it is committed through
simulating public authority.
c. That any serious physical
injuries are inflicted upon the
person kidnapped or detained
or threats to kill him are made.
d. That the person kidnapped or
detained is a minor, female or a
public officer.
e. (Extorting ransom on the part
of the accused.)
*If the offender is a public officer, the crime is
arbitrary detention.
*Killing third person in kidnapping – separate
crime of homicide and kidnapping.
ARTICLE 268 – SLIGHT ILLEGAL DETENTION
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a private individual.
2. That he kidnaps or detains another, or
in any manner deprives him of his
liberty.
3. That the act of kidnapping or detention
is illegal.
4. That the crime is committed without
the attendance of any of the
circumstances enumerated in article
267.
ARTICLE 269 – UNLAWFUL ARREST
*Elements:
*Intention to deprive the victim of his liberty for
purpose of extorting ransom on the part of the
accused is essential in the crime of kidnapping.
*As long as the kidnapping or detention was
committed for the purpose of extorting ransom.
Actual demand for ransom is not necessary.
*It is not necessary that the victim be placed in
an enclosure
*Detention is illegal when not ordered by
competent authority or not permitted by law.
*Where the victim is taken from one place to
another solely for the purpose of killing him, the
crime committed is murder.
*Ransom – is money, price or consideration
paid or demanded for redemption of a captured
person or persons, a payment that releases
from captivity.
*Conspiracy to extort ransom makes all the
conspirators liable.
1. That the offender arrests or detains
another person.
2. That the purpose of the offender is to
deliver him to the proper authorities.
3. That the arrest or detention is not
authorized by law or there is no
reasonable ground thereof.
*The offender is any person, whether a public
officer or a private individual.
*There is no unlawful arrest, when the arrest is
authorized by a warrant issued by the court.
ARTICLE 270 – KIDNAPPING AND FAILURE TO
RETURN A MINOR
*Elements:
1. That the offender is entrusted with the
custody of a minor person.
2. That he deliberately fails to restore the
said minor to his parents or guardians.
*Age of minor is under 18 years.
60
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*What is punished is the deliberate failure of
the custodian of the minor to restore the latter
to his parents or guardian.
ARTICLE 271 – INDUCING A MINOR TO
ABANDON HIS HOME
1. That the offender compels a debtor to
work for him, either as household
servant or farm laborer.
2. That it is against the will of the debtor.
3. That the purpose is to require or
enforce the payment of a debt.
*Elements:
1. That a minor is living in the home of his
parents or guardian or the person
entrusted with his custody.
2. That the offender induces said minor to
abandon such home.
*The inducement must be actual, committed
with criminal intent, and determined by a will to
cause damage.
*Father or mother may commit crimes under
270-271.
ARTICLE 272 – SLAVERY
*Elements:
1. That the offender purchase, sell,
kidnaps or detains a human being.
2. That the purpose of the offender is to
enslave such human being.
ARTICLE 273 – EXPLOITATION OF CHILD LABOR
ARTICLE 275 – ABANDONMENT OF PERSONS IN
DANGER AND ABANDONMENT OF ONE’S OWN
VICTIM
*Acts punished:
1. By failing to render assistance to any
person whom the offender finds in an
uninhabited place wounded or in
danger of dying when he can render
such assistance without detriment to
himself, unless such omission shall
constitute a more serious offense.
2. By failing to help or render assistance to
another
whom
the
offender
accidentally wounded or injured.
3. By failing to deliver a child, under seven
years of age whom the offender has
found abandoned to the authorities or
to his family, or by failing to take him to
a safe place.
*If a person intentionally wounded another in
an uninhabited place – article 275 is not
applicable.
*Elements:
1. That the offender retains a minor in his
service.
2. That it is against the will of the minor.
3. That it is under the pretext of
reimbursing himself of a debt incurred
by one ascendant, guardian or a person
entrusted with the custody of such
minor.
ARTICLE 274 – SERVICES RENDERED UNDER
COMPULSION IN PAYMENT OF DEBT
*Elements:
*It is immaterial that the offender did not know
that the child is under seven years.
ARTICLE 276 – ABANDONING A MINOR
*Elements:
1. That the offender has the custody of a
child.
2. That the child is under seven years of
age.
3. That he abandons such child.
4. That he has no intent to kill the child
when the latter abandoned.
61
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Intent to kill cannot be presumed from death
of the child – only in crimes against persons.
*A permanent, conscious and deliberate
abandonment is required in this article.
ARTICLE 277 – ABANDONMENT OF MINOR BY
PERSON ENTRUSTED WITH HIS CUSTODY;
INDIFFERENCE OF PARENTS
person engaged in any of the callings
mentioned in paragraph 2 or to
accompany any habitual vagrant or
beggar.)
ARTICLE 279
ARTICLE 280 – QUALIFIED TRESPASS TO
DWELLING
*Elements:
*Acts punished:
1. By delivering a minor to public
institution or other persons without the
consent of the one who entrusted such
minor to the care of the offender or, in
the absence of that one, without the
consent of the proper authorities.
2. By neglecting his children by not giving
them the education which their station
in life requires and financial condition
permits.
ARTICLE 278 – EXPLOITATION OF MINORS
*Acts punished:
1. (By causing any boy or girl under 16
years of age to perform any dangerous
feat of balancing, physical strength or
contortion, the offender being any
person.
2. By employing children under 16 years of
age who are not the children or
descendants of the offender in
exhibitions of acrobats, gymnast, ropealke , di e , o ild a i al ta e …
3. By employing any descendants under
12 years of age in dangerous
exhibitions.
4. By delivering a child under 16 years of
age gratuitously to any person following
any calling enumerated in paragraph 2,
o to a ha itual ag a t o egga …
5. By inducing any child under 16 years of
age to abandon the home of its
as e da ts, gua dia s… to follo a
1. That the offender is a private person.
2. That he enters the dwelling of another.
3. That such entrance is against the
latte ’s ill.
*If the offense is committed by means of
violence or intimidation, the penalty is higher.
*Dwelling place – any building or structure
exclusively devoted for rest and comfort.
*Whether a building is a dwelling house or not
depends upon the use to which it is put.
*Dwelling includes a room occupied by another
person.
*Lack of permission does not amount to
prohibition.
*There must be opposition on the part of the
owner of the house to the entry of the accused.
*It is a well-settled rule that whoever enters the
dwelling of another at late hour of the night
after the inmates have retired and closed doors
does so against their will. Under these
circumstances an express prohibition is not
necessary, as it is presumed.
*Prohibition is implied in entrance through the
window – means not intended for ingress.
*Prohibition must be in existence prior or at the
time of entrance.
62
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*The violence or intimidation may take place
immediately after the entrance. – Prohibition is
not necessary when violence or intimidation is
employed by the offender.
*Trespass may be committed by the owner of
the dwelling – against the will of the actual
occupants.
*Cases to which the provision of this article are
not applicable:
1. If the e t a e to a othe ’s d elli g is
made for the purpose of preventing
some serious harm to himself, the
occupants of the dwelling or a third
person.
2. If the purpose is to render some service
to humanity or justice.
3. If the place where entrance is made is a
café, tavern, inns, and other public
houses, while the same are open.
ARTICLE 281 – OTHER FORMS OF TRESPASS
*Elements:
1. That the offender enters the closed
premises or the fenced estate of
another.
2. That the entrance is made while either
of them is uninhabited.
3. That the prohibition to enter be
manifest.
4. That the trespasser has not secured the
permission of the owner or the
caretaker thereof.
ARTICLE 282 – GRAVE THREATS
*Acts punished:
1. By threatening another with the
infliction upon his person, honor or
property or that of his family of any
wrong amounting to a crime and
demanding money or imposing any
other condition even though not
unlawful, and the offender attained his
purpose.
2. By making such threat without the
offender attaining his purpose.
3. By threatening another with the
infliction upon his person, honor or
property or that of his family of any
wrong amounting to a crime, the threat
not being subject to a condition.
*The threat must be to inflict a wrong
amounting to a crime upon the person, honor
or property of the offended party or that of his
family.
*If the offender attained his purpose, the
penalty is one degree lower of the penalty of
the crime threatened to be committed shall be
imposed.
*If the offender does not attain his purpose – 2
degree lower.
*When the threat is not subject to a condition,
the penalty is fixed to arresto mayor and a fine
not exceeding P500.
*If the threat is made in writing or through a
middleman, the penalty is to be imposed in its
maximum period.
*The threat should not be made in the heat of
anger, because such threat is punished under
Article. 285 paragraph 2.
*Essence of the crime of threat is intimidation.
*It is not necessary that the offended party was
present at the time the threats were made.
*The crime of grave threats is consummated as
soon as the threats come to the knowledge of
the person threatened.
*Threats made in connection with the
commission of other crimes, are absorbed by
the latter.
63
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 283 – LIGHT THREATS
*Elements:
1. That the offender makes a threat to
commit a wrong.
2. That the wrong does not constitute a
crime.
3. That there is a demand for money or
that other condition is imposed, even
though not unlawful.
4. That the offender has attained his
purpose or that he has not attained his
purpose.
*Light threats are committed in the same
manner as grave threats, except that the act
threatened to be committed should not be a
crime.
ARTICLE 285 – OTHER LIGHT THREATS
*Act punished:
1. By threatening another with weapon, or
by drawing such weapon in a quarrel,
unless it be in lawful self-defense.
2. By orally threatening another, in the
heat of anger, with some harm
constituting a crime, without persisting
in the idea involved in his threat.
3. By orally threatening to do another any
harm not constituting a felony.
ARTICLE 286 – GRAVE COERCIONS
*Ways of committing grave coercions:
1. By preventing another by means of
violence, threats or intimidation, from
doing something not prohibited by law.
2. Compelling another by means of
violence, threats or intimidation to do
something against his will, whether it
be right or wrong.
*Element:
1. That the person prevented another
from doing something not prohibited by
law, or that he compelled him to do
something against his will, be it right or
wrong.
2. The prevention or compulsion be
effected by violence, threats or
intimidation.
3. That the restraint shall not be made
under authority of law or in the exercise
of any lawful right.
*The thing prevented from execution must not
be prohibited by law; otherwise, there will be
no coercion.
*In grave coercion, the act of preventing by
force must be made at the time the offended
party was doing or about to do the act to be
prevented. If the act was already done when
violence is exerted, the crime is unjust vexation.
*Compelling another to do something includes
the offe de ’s a t of doi g it hi self hile
subjecting another to his will.
*When the complainant is in actual possession
of a thing, even if he has no right to that
possession, compelling him by means of
violence to give up the possession, even by the
owner himself is grave coercion.
*The crime of grave coercion is consummated
even if the offender failed to accomplish his
purpose.
*The crime is not grave coercion when the
violence is employed to seize anything
belonging to the debtor of the offender. (Light
coercion)
*Surrounding complainant in a notoriously
threatening attitude is sufficient. – Guilty of
coercion.
*The force or intimidation must be immediate,
actual or imminent.
64
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*The person who restrains the will and liberty
of another has no right to do so as a private
person or does not act in the exercise of a duty
in the case of a person with a duty to perform
or with authority as a public functionary.
*Unjust vexation – any human conduct, which
although not productive of some physical or
material harm would, however, unjustly annoy
or vex an innocent person.
*There is no grave coercion when the accused
acts in good faith in the performance of his
duty.
*Whethe the offe de ’s a t aused a o a e,
irritation, vexation, torment, distress or
disturbance to the mind of the person to whom
it is directed.
*The purpose of the law in penalizing coercion –
no person may take the law into his hands, and
that our government is one of law, not of men.
*A person who takes the law into his hands
with violence is guilty of grave coercion.
*Coercion is consummated even if the offended
party did not accede to the purpose of the
coercion.
ARTICLE 287 – LIGHT COERCIONS/(UNJUST
VEXATION)
*Elements:
1. That the offender must be a creditor.
2. That he seizes anything belonging to his
debtor.
3. That the seizure of the thing be
accomplished by means of violence or a
display of material force producing
intimidation.
4. That the purpose of the offender is to
apply the same to the payment of the
debt.
*Taking possession of the thing belonging to the
debtor, through deceit and misrepresentation,
for the purpose of applying the same to the
payment of the debt, is unjust vexation under
the second paragraph of this article.
*Kissing a girl, without performing acts of
lasciviousness, is unjust vexation.
*Light coercion under the first paragraph will be
unjust vexation if the element of employing
violence or intimidation is absent. – Same with
grave coercion – when no violence, threat or
intimidation – only unjust vexation.
ARTICLE 288 – OTHER SIMILAR COERCIONS
*Acts punished:
1. By forcing or compelling, directly or
indirectly or knowingly permitting the
forcing or compelling of the laborer or
employee of the offender to purchase
merchandise or commodities of any
kind from him.
2. By paying wages due his laborer or
employee by means of tokens or
objects other than the legal tender
currency of the Philippines, unless
expressly requested by such laborer or
employee.
ARTICLE 289 – FORMATION, MAINTENANCE,
AND PROHIBITION OF COMBINATION OFF
CAPITAL OR LABOR THROUGH VIOLENCE OR
THREATS
*Elements:
*It is sufficient that the attitude of the offender
in seizing the property of his debtor is
notoriously menacing as to amount to a grave
intimidation, or create such situation that
necessarily would institute the victim.
1. That the offender employs violence or
threats, in such a degree as to compel
or force the laborer or employers in the
65
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
free and legal exercise of their industry
or work.
2. That the purpose is to organize,
maintain or prevent coalitions of capital
or labor, strike of laborers or lockout of
employers.
ARTICLE 290 – DISCOVERING SECRETS
THROUGH SEIZURE OF CORRESPONDENCE
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a private individual
or even a public officer not in the
exercise of his official function.
2. That he seizes the papers or letters of
another.
3. That the purpose is to discover the
secrets of such another person.
4. That the offender is informed of the
contents of the papers or letters seized.
*Article 290 is not applicable to parents,
gua dia s… spouses.
ARTICLE 291 – REVEALING SECRETS WITH
ABUSE OF OFFICE
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a manager,
employee or servant.
2. That he learns the secret of his principal
or master in such capacity.
3. That he reveals such secrets.
ARTICLE 292 – REVELATION OF INDUSTRIAL
SECRETS
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a person in charge,
employee
or
workman
of
a
manufacturing
or
industrial
establishment.
2. That the manufacturing or industrial
establishment has a secret of the
industry which the offender has
learned.
3. That the offender reveals such secrets.
4. That prejudice is caused to the owner.
*Secrets must
processes.
relate
to
manufacturing
*The revelation of secret might be made after
the employee or workman had ceased to be
connected with the establishment.
ARTICLE 293 – ROBBERY
*Elements of robbery in general:
1. That there be personal property;
belonging to another.
2. That there is unlawful taking of that
property.
3. That the taking must be with intent to
gain.
4. That there is violence against or
intimidation of any person, or force
upon anything.
*Robbery – the taking of personal property
belonging to another, with intent to gain, by
means of violence against or intimidation of any
person, or using force upon anything.
*Classification of robbery:
1. Robbery with violence against, or
intimidation of persons. (Article 294)
2. Robbery by the use of force upon things
(Article 299 & 302)
*The property taken must be personal property.
– If it is a real property – the crime is usurpation
under article 312.
*Prohibitive articles may be the subject matter
of robbery.
*A co-owner or partner cannot commit robbery
or theft with regard to the co-ownership or
partnership property.
66
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*In the commission of the crime of robbery, it is
not necessary that the person, from whom the
property is taken by means of threat and
violence, shall be the owner thereof.
- The possession of the property is sufficient –
ownership is not necessary.
- So long as the personal property taken does
not belong to the accused. – Impossible crime if
it is.
*In robbery, the personal property of another is
taken by the offender against the will of the
owner.
*Taking must be unlawful.
2. Rape;
3. Intentional mutilation; or
4. Any of the serious physical injuries
paragraph 1 & 2.
-The taking of personal property is robbery
complexed with any of those crimes under 294.
– Even if the taking was already complete when
the violence was used by the offender.
*The use of force upon things will not make the
taking of personal property robbery, if the
culprit never entered a house or building –
whole body.
*If robbery with violence against or intimidation
of persons and robbery by use of force upon
things, the latter shall be charged.
*Intent to gain is presumed from the unlawful
taking of personal property.
CARNAPPING
*One who takes property openly and avowedly
under claim of title proffered in good faith is
not guilty of robbery even though the claim of
ownership is untenable.
*Absence of intent to gain will make the taking
of personal property grave coercion if there is
violence used.
*The ele e t of pe so al p ope t elo gi g
to a othe a d that of i te t to gai
ust
concur.
*The violence must be against the person of the
offended party, not upon the thing taken.
*Intimidation need not be threat of bodily
harm.
*If there is violence or intimidation at any time
before aspiration is complete, the taking of
property is qualified to robbery.
- It is not necessary that violence or intimidation
should be present from the very beginning.
*When violence results in:
ARTICLE 294 – ROBBERY WITH VIOLENCE
AGAINST OR INTIMIDATION OF PERSONS
*Acts punished:
When by reason or on occasion of such
robbery:
1. Homicide is committed.
2. Accompanied by rape or intentional
mutilation or arson.
3. Any of physical injuries resulting in
insanity, imbecility, impotency or
blindness is inflicted.
4. Any of physical injuries resulting in the
loss of the use of speech or power to
hear or to smell, or the loss of an eye, a
hand, a foot, an arm, or a leg or the loss
of the use of any such member or
incapacity for the work in which the
injured party is theretofore habitually
engaged is inflicted.
5. Commission of the robbery is carried to
a degree clearly unnecessary for the
commission of the crime.
1. Homicide;
67
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
6. The offender shall inflict upon any
person not responsible for the
commission of the robbery any of the
physical injuries where the injured
becomes deformed or losses any other
member of his body or loses the use
thereof or becomes ill or incapacitated
for the performance of the work in
which he is habitually engaged for more
than 90 days or the injured becomes ill
or incapacitated for labor for more than
30 days.
7. If the violence employed by the
offender does not cause any of the
serious physical injuries defined in
article 263, or if the offender employs
intimidation only.
*The crime defined in this article is a special
complex crime.
*Robbery and homicide are separate offenses,
he the ho i ide as ot o
itted o the
o asio o
easo of the o e .
*Intent to take personal property belonging to
another with intent to gain must precede the
killing.
*The offender must have the intent to take
personal property before killing.
*As long as homicide results in the robbery –
special complex of robbery with homicide.
*Killing a person to escape after the
commission of robbery is robbery with
homicide.
*Where homicide and physical injuries were
perpetrated to remove opposition to robbery or
suppressing evidence thereof, the crime is
robbery with homicide only.
*When homicide is not proved – robbery only.
*In robbery with homicide, the person charged
as accessory must have the knowledge of the
commission of robbery and homicide.
*All who participated in the robbery as
principals are principals in robbery with
homicide.
*Rape committed on occasion of robbery –
special complex
*Even if the rape was committed in another
place, it is still robbery with rape.
*Article 294 paragraph 2 does not cover
robbery with attempted rape.
*When the taking of personal property of a
woman is an independent act following
defe da t’s failu e to o su
ate the ape,
there are two distinct crimes.
*Additional rapes committed on the same
occasion of robbery will not increase the
penalty.
*When the taking of property after the rape is
not with intent to gain – separate crimes.
*It is still robbery with homicide if the person
killed is a robber himself.
*When rape and homicide co-exist in the
commission of robbery – crime is robbery with
homicide – rape is only an aggravating. (People
s. Ba sa…
*There is robbery with homicide, even if the
person killed was an innocent bystander and
not the person robbed.
*Violence or intimidation need not be present
before or at the exact moment when the object
is taken.
*It is still robbery with homicide even if death
of a person supervened by mere accident.
*When the act of snatching a thing from his
hands did not result in violence against the
68
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
person of the offended party, there is no
robbery – only theft.
4. That he did not attempt to prevent the
assault.
*In robbery with intimidation, there must be
acts done by the accused which either by their
own nature or by reason of the circumstances
under which they are executed, inspire fear in
the person against whom they are directed.
*When the robbery was not committed by a
band, the robber who did not take part in the
assault by another is not liable for that assault.
ARTICLE 295 – ROBBERY WITH PHYSICAL
INJURIES, COMMITTED IN AN UNINHABITED
PLACE AND BY A BAND, OR WITH THE USE OF
FIREARMS ON A STREET, ROAD OR ALLEY
ARTICLE 297 – ATTEMPTED AND FRUSTRATED
ROBBERY COMMITTED UNDER CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES
*Robbery with violence against or intimidation
of persons qualified – if committed:
1.
2.
3.
4.
In an uninhabited place;
By a band;
By attacking a moving vehicle;
B
e te i g
the
passe ge s’
compartment in a train;
5. On a street, road, highway or alley or
with the use of firearms.
*No crime of robbery with homicide by a band.
*The penalty is the same, whether the robbery
is attempted or frustrated.
*There is only one crime of attempted robbery
with homicide even if slight physical injuries
were inflicted on other persons on the occasion
or by reason of the robbery.
ARTICLE 298 – EXECUTION OF DEEDS BY
MEANS OF VIOLENCE OR INTIMIDATION
*Elements:
*Applicable only in Paragraphs 3, 4, and 5 of
article 294.
*Must be alleged in the information.
*Cannot be offset by a generic mitigating
circumstance.
ARTICLE 296 – ROBBERY COMMITTED BY A
BAND
*When at least 4 armed men malefactors take
part in the commission of a robbery – it is
committed by a band.
*Requisites for liability for the acts of the other
members of the band:
1. That he was a member of the band.
2. That he was present at the commission
of a robbery by that band.
3. That the other members of the band
committed an assault.
1. That the offender has intent to defraud
another.
2. That the offender compels him to sign,
execute, or deliver any public
instrument or document.
3. That the compulsion is by means of
violence or intimidation.
*Public or private document.
*Article 298 is not applicable if the document is
void.
ARTICLE 299 – ROBBERY IN AN INHABITED
HOUSE OR PUBLIC BUILDING OR EDIFICE
DEVOTED TO RELIGIOUS WORSHIP
*Elements: (Subdivision A)
1. That the offender entered an inhabited
place, or public building or edifice
devoted to religious worship.
69
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
2. That the entrance was effected by any
of the following means:
a. Through an opening not
intended for entrance or
egress.
b. By breaking any wall, roof or
floor or breaking any door or
window.
c. By using false keys, picklocks or
similar tools.
d. By using fictitious name or
pretending the exercise of
public authority.
3. That once inside the building, the
offender took personal property
belonging to another with intent to
gain.
*The offe de
ust e te the house o
building in which the robbery is committed.
*In entering the building, the offender must
have an intention to take personal property.
*The placed entered must be a house or a
building.
*Inhabited house is any shelter, ship or vessel
constituting the dwelling of one or more
persons.
*Public building is every building owned by the
government or belonging to a private person
but used or rented by the government.
*Any of the four means described in subdivision
A of article 299 must be resorted to by the
offender to enter a house or building, not to get
out.
*The whole body of culprit must be inside the
building to constitute entering.
*The genuine key must be stolen, not taken by
force or with intimidation, from the owner.
(robbery with intimidation of person is
committed if there is intimidation)
-The false key or picklock must be used to enter
the building.
*It is only theft when the false key is used to
open wardrobe or locked receptacle or drawer
or inside door.
ROBBERY WITH FORCE UPON THINGS UNDER
SUBDIVISION (B) OF ARTICLE 299
*Elements:
1. That the offender is inside a dwelling
house, public building, or edifice
devoted to religious worship, regardless
of the circumstances under which he
entered it.
2. That the offender takes personal
property belonging to another, with
intent to gain under any of the
following circumstances:
a. By breaking doors, wardrobes,
chests, or any other kind of
locked or sealed furniture or
receptacle; or
b. By taking such furniture or
objects away to be broken or
forced open outside the place
of robbery.
*Entrance into the building by any of the means
mentioned in subdivision (A) of article 299 is
not required in robbery under subdivision (B) of
the same article.
*The te
Doo i pa ag aph su di isio
of a ti le
, efe s o l to doo , lids,
ope i g sheets’ of fu itu e o othe po ta
receptacles – not to inside doors of house
building.
B
o
le
or
*Breaking the keyhole of the door of a
wardrobe, which is locked, is breaking locked
furniture.
*When sealed box or receptacle is taken out of
the house or building for the purpose of
70
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
breaking it outside, it is not necessary that it is
actually opened.
ARTICLE 302 – ROBBERY IN AN UNINHABITED
PLACE OR IN A PRIVATE BUILDING
ARTICLE 300 – ROBBERY IN AN UNINHABITED
PLACE AND BY A BAND
*Elements:
*Robbery in an inhabited house, public building
or edifice devoted to religious worship is
qualified when committed by a band and in an
uninhabited place – it must concur together and
must be alleged in the information.
ARTICLE 301 – WHAT IS AN INHABITED HOUSE,
PUBLIC BUILDING, OR BUILDING DEDICATED
TO RELIGIOUS WORSHIP AND THEIR
DEPENDENCIES
*Inhabited house – any shelter, ship or vessel
constituting the dwelling of one or more
persons even though the inhabitants thereof
shall temporarily be absent therefrom when the
robbery is committed.
*Public building – every building owned by the
government or belonging to a private person
but used or rented by the government,
although temporarily unoccupied by the same.
*The place is still inhabited house even if the
occupant was absent.
1. That the offender entered an
uninhabited place or a building which
was not a dwelling house, not a public
building, or an edifice devoted to
religious worship.
2. That any of the following circumstances
was present:
a. The entrance was effected
through an opening not
intended for entrance or
egress;
b. A wall, roof, floor or outside
door or window was broken;
c. The entrance was effected
through the use of false keys,
picklocks or other similar tools.
d. A door, wardrobe, chest or any
sealed or closed furniture or
receptacle was broken; or
e. A closed or sealed receptacle
was removed, even if the same
be broken open elsewhere;
3. That with intent to gain, the offender
took therefrom personal property
belonging to another.
*Dependencies – all interior courts, corrals,
warehouse, granaries or inclosed places
contiguous to the building or edifice, having an
interior entrance connected therewith, and
which form part of the whole.
*The uninhabited place is an uninhabited
building.
*Requisites:
*The receptacle must be closed or sealed.
*Building – any kind of structure used for
storage or safekeeping of personal property.
1. Must be contiguous to the building;
2. Must have an interior entrance
connected therewith.
3. Must form part of the whole.
*Taking of mail matter or large cattle in any
kind of robbery makes the penalty higher by
one degree (Qualified robbery) – motor vehicle,
coconuts and fish are not included.
*Orchards and lands used for cultivation are not
dependencies (article 301 paragraph 3)
ARTICLE 303 – ROBBERY OF CEREALS, FRUITS
OR FIREWOOD IN AN UNINHABITED PLACE OR
PRIVATE BUILDING
71
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
b. To kidnap persons for the
purpose of extorting or to
obtain ransom; or
c. To attain by means of force and
violence any other purpose.
*Penalty is one degree lower when cereals,
fruits or firewood are taken in robbery with
force upon things.
*Cereals are seedlings which are the immediate
product of the soil.
ARTICLE 304 – POSSESSION OF PICKLOCKS OR
SIMILAR TOOLS
*Elements:
1. That the offender has in his possession
picklocks or similar tools.
2. That such picklocks or similar tools are
specially adopted to the commission of
robbery.
3. That the offender does not have lawful
cause for such possession.
*Actual use of picklocks or similar tools, not
necessary in illegal possession thereof.
*Higher penalty if the offender is a locksmith.
ARTICLE 305 – FALSE KEYS
The term false keys shall be deemed to include:
1. The tools mentioned in the next
preceeding article.
2. Genuine keys stolen from the owner.
3. Any keys other than those intended by
the owner for use in the lock forcibly
opened by the offender.
*Possession of false keys in paragraph 2 and 3
of article 305, not punishable.
ARTICLE 306 – WHO ARE BRIGANDS
*Presumption of law as to brigands – all are
presumed highway robbers or brigands, if any
of them carries unlicensed firearm.
*The arms carried by the member of the band
of robbers may be any deadly weapon.
*The term highway includes city streets.
ARTICLE 307 – AIDING AND ABETTING A BAND
OF BRIGANDS
*Elements:
1. That there is a band of brigands.
2. That the offender knows the band to be
brigands.
3. That the offender does any of the
following acts:
a. He in any manner aids, abets or
protects such band of brigands.
b. He gives them information of
the movement of the police or
other peace officer of the
government.
c. He acquires or receives the
property taken by such
brigands.
*It shall be presumed that the person
performing any of the acts provided in this
article has performed them knowingly, unless
the contrary is proven.
PD532 – HIGHWAY ROBBERY/BRIGANDAGE
*There is brigandage when:
1. There be at least four armed persons.
2. They formed a band of robbers.
3. The purpose is any of the following:
a. To commit robbery in the
highway.
*The seizure of any person for ransom,
extortion or other unlawful purposes, or the
taking away of the property of another by
means of violence against or intimidation of
persons or force upon things or other unlawful
72
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
means, committed by any person on any
Philippine highways.
*Philippine highway – any road, street, passage,
highway and bridges or other parts thereof, or
railway or railroad within the Philippines used
by persons or vehicles, or locomotives or trains
for the movement or circulation of person or
transportation of goods, articles or property or
both.
*A
pe so
accomplice.
ho aids, p ote t o a ets… -
ARTICLE 308 – WHO ARE LIABLE FOR THEFT
*The following are liable for theft:
1. Those who with intent to gain, but
without violence against or intimidation
of persons nor force upon things, take,
personal property of another, without
the latte ’s o se t.
2. Those who, (a) having found lost
property, (b) fails to deliver the same to
the local authorities or to its owner.
3. Those who, (a) after having maliciously
damaged the property of another, (b)
removed or make use of the fruits or
object of the damage caused by them.
4. Those who, (a) enter an enclosed estate
or a field where (b) trespass is
forbidden or which belongs to another
and, without the consent of its owner,
(c) hunts or fish upon the same or
gather fruits, cereals or other forest or
farm products.
*Elements:
1. That there be taking of personal
property.
2. The said property belongs to another.
3. That the taking be done with intent to
gain.
4. That the taking be done without the
consent of the owner.
5. That the taking be accomplished
without the use of violence against or
intimidation of persons or force upon
things.
*When taking is consummated
- When the offender is able to place the thing
under his control.
- Had full possession.
*The offender must have the intention of
making himself the owner of the thing taken.
*Personal property includes electricity and gas
– capable of appropriation by another.
*Joyride or using car of another to learn how to
drive is sufficient gain.
*Actual or real gain, not necessary in theft.
*There is no theft when the taking of personal
property is with the consent of its owner.
*It is not robbery when violence is for a reason
entirely foreign to the fact of taking.
*When a person has in possession, part of the
recently stolen property, he is presumed to be
the thief.
*The te
stealing.
lost p ope t
e
a es loss
*The law does not require knowledge of the
owner of the lost property.
*Finder
of
hidden
treasure
who
misappropriated the share pertaining to the
owner of the property is guilty of theft as
regards that share.
*HUNTING, FISHING OR GATHERING FRUITS…
IN ENCLOSED ESTATE.
*Elements:
73
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
1. That there is an enclosed estate or a
field where trespass is forbidden or
which belongs to another.
2. That the offender enters the same.
3. That the offender hunts, fishes upon
the same or gathers fruits, cereals or
other forest farm products in the estate
or field.
4. That the hunting or fishing or gathering
of products is without the consent of
the owner.
*Fishing should not be in the fishponds within
the field or estate. (It is qualified theft if the fish
is taken in a fishpond.)
ARTICLE 309 – PENALTIES
*Basis of penalty in theft
1. Value of the stolen thing.
2. The value and also the nature of the
property taken.
3. The circumstances or causes that
impelled the culprit to commit the
crime.
*Offender is liable for theft of whole car taken
to another place, even if tires only are taken
away.
ARTICLE 310 – QUALIFIED THEFT
*Penalty is two degrees higher
*The abuse of confidence must be grave ( high
degree of confidence)
*Theft of any material, spare parts, product or
article by employees and laborers is heavily
punished.
*The confidence gravely abused must be that
existing between the offended party and the
offender.
*When the purpose of taking the car is to
destroy by burning it, the crime is arson.
*The unlawful taking of motor vehicles is now
covered by the Anti-Carnapping Law, and not by
the provisions on qualified theft or robbery.
*Taking at the same time several cows is only
one crime.
ANTI – CATTLE RUSTLING LAW PD 533
*Cattle rustling – taking away by any means,
method or scheme, without the consent of the
owner/raiser, of any of the animals ( large
cattle) whether or not for profit or gain, or
whether committed with or without violence
against or intimidation of any person or force
upon things, it includes the killing of large
cattle, or taking its meat or hide.
*Theft is qualified:
1. If the theft is committed by a domestic
servant.
2. If the theft is committed with grave
abuse of confidence.
3. If the property stolen is (a) (motor
vehicle) (b) mail matter or (c) (large
cattle)
4. If the property stolen is a fish taken
from a fishpond or fishery.
5. If property taken on the occasion of
fire, earthquake, typhoon, volcanic
eruption or any other calamity,
vehicular accident or civil disturbance.
*Large Cattle – cow, carabao, horse, mule, ass,
or other domestic member of the bovine family.
*Timber smuggling from, and illegal cutting of
logs in, public forest and forest reserves –
qualified theft/PD330
ANTI – FENCING LAW PD 1612
*Fencing – the act of any person who, with
intent to gain for himself or for another, shall
buy, receive, possess, keep, acquire, conceal,
sell or dispose of, or shall buy and sell or in any
other manner deal in any article, item, or object
74
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
or anything of value which he knows, or should
be known to him, to have been derived from
the proceeds of the crime of robbery or theft.
ARTICLE 312 – OCCUPATION OF REAL
PROPERTY OR USURPATION OF REAL RIGHTS
IN PROPERTY
*Elements:
*Acts punished:
1. The crime of robbery or theft has been
committed.
2. The accused, who is not a principal or
accomplice in the commission of the
crime of robbery or theft, buys,
receives, possess, keeps, acquires,
conceal, sells or disposes, or buy and
sells, or in any manner deals in any
article, item, object or anything of
value, which has been derived from the
proceeds of the said crime.
3. The accused knows or should have
known that the said article, item, object
or anything of value has been derived
from the proceeds of the crime of
robbery or theft.
4. There is, on the part of the accused,
intent to gain for himself or another.
*Mere possession of any good, article, item,
object or anything of value which has been the
subject of robbery or thievery shall be prima
facie evidence of fencing.
1. By taking possession of any real
property belonging to another by
means of violence against or
intimidation of persons.
2. By usurping any real rights in property
belonging to another by means of
violence against or intimidation of
persons.
*Elements:
1. That the offender takes possession of
any real property or usurps any real
rights in property.
2. That the real property or real rights
belongs to another.
3. That violence against or intimidation of
persons is used by the offender in
occupying real property or usurping real
rights in property.
4. That there is intent to gain.
*Civil liability only when there is no violence
against or intimidation of persons.
*The crime of robbery and theft, on one hand,
and fencing, on the other, are separate and
distinct offenses.
ARTICLE 313 – ALTERING BOUNDARIES OR
LANDMARKS
ARTICLE 311 – THEFT OF THE PROPERTY IF THE
NATIONAL LIBRARY AND NATIONAL MUSEUM
*Elements:
*Penalty is always arresto mayor or fine ranging
from 200-500 pesos.
Except when committed with grave abuse of
confidence – penalty for qualified theft
1. That there be boundary mark or
monuments of towns, provinces or
estates, or any other marks intended to
designate the boundaries of the same.
2. The offender alters said boundary
marks.
*Intent to gain is not necessary.
75
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 314 – FRAUDULENT INSOLVENCY
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a debtor; that is, he
has obligations due and payable.
2. That he absconds with his property.
3. That there be prejudice to his creditor.
*Actual prejudice, not intention alone, is
required.
*The person prejudiced must be the creditor of
the offender.
*The thing delivered must be fully paid for
when it was received by the other party, for the
person making delivery be liable for estafa.
*When there is no agreement as to the quality
of the thing to be delivered, the delivery of the
thing not acceptable to the complainant is not
estafa.
*Even though such obligation be based on
immoral or illegal consideration – crime of
estafa may arise.
*Elements of estafa with abuse of confidence
ARTICLE 315 – SWINDLING (ESTAFA)
*Elements of estafa in general:
1. That the accused defrauded another (a)
by abuse of confidence, or (b) by means
of deceit; and
2. That damage or prejudice capable of
pecuniary estimation is caused to the
offended party or third person.
*Estafa is committed –
a. With unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence.
b. By means of false pretenses or fraudulent
acts.
c. through fraudulent means.
1. That money, goods, or other personal
property be received by the offender in
trust, or on commission or for
administration, or under any other
obligation involving the duty to make
delivery of, or to return, the same.
2. That there be misappropriation or
conversion of such money or property
by the offender, or denial on his part of
such receipt.
3. That
such
misappropriation
or
conversion or denial is to the prejudice
of another.
4. That there is a demand made by the
offended party to the offender.
*Che k is i luded i the o d
*Abuse of confidence and deceit are two
different means of committing estafa.
o e
*Money, goods or other personal property
must be received by the offender.
*Elements of estafa with unfaithfulness
1. That the offender has an onerous
obligation to deliver something of
value.
2. That he alters its substance, quantity or
quality.
3. That the damage or prejudice is caused
to another.
*There must be an existing obligation to deliver
something of value.
*Judicial possession – possession which gives
the transferee a right over the thing which the
transferee may set up against the owner.
*Failure to turn over to the bank the proceeds
of the sale of goods covered by trust receipts is
estafa.
*Money, goods or other personal property
must be received by the offender under certain
76
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
juridical
ownership, he misappropriates the thing which
has become the exclusive property of the other.
*When ownership of the thing is transferred to
the person who has received it, his failure will
give rise to civil liability only.
*But when the money or property had been
received by a partner for a specific purpose and
he later misappropriated it, such partner is
guilty of estafa.
kinds of transaction
possession to him.
transferring
*When the transaction of purchase and sale
fails, there is no estafa if the accused refused to
return the advance payment.
*There is no estafa if the thing is received under
a contract of sale on credit.
*Demand is not required by law; but is
necessary, because failure to account, upon
demand, is circumstantial evidence of
misappropriation.
*There is no estafa through negligence.
*Acceptance of promissory note or extension of
time for payment does not constitute novation.
*Novation does not extinguish criminal liability
in general. Except, when the novation was done
before the criminal liability arise.
nd
*2
Element of estafa with abuse of
confidence
1. By misappropriating the thing received.
2. By converting the thing received.
3. By denying that the thing was received.
*Conversion – it presupposes that the thing has
been devoted to a purpose or use different
from that agreed upon.
*Selling the thing on credit is estafa.
*The crime of estafa under 315 par 1 (b) is not
committed
when
there
is
neither
misappropriation nor conversion.
*Partners are not liable for estafa of money or
property received for the partnership when the
business commenced and profits accrued.
*Failure of partners to account for partnership
funds may give rise to a civil obligation only, not
estafa.
*A co-owner is not liable for estafa, but he is
liable if, after the termination of the co-
*The gravity of the crime of estafa is
determined on the basis of the amount not
returned before the institution of the criminal
action.
*In estafa, the offender receives the thing – he
does not take the thing without the consent of
the owner.
*Servant, domestic or employee who
misappropriates the thing he received from his
master or employer is not guilty of estafa.
(theft)
*Misappropriation of firearms received by a
policeman is estafa, if it is not involved in the
commission of a crime; malversation, if involved
in a commission of crime.
*Elements of estafa by taking
advantage of the signature in blank
undue
1. That the paper with the signature of the
offended party be in blank.
2. That the offended party should have
delivered it to the offender.
3. That above the signature of the
offended party a document is written
by the offender without authority to do
so.
4. That the document so written creates a
liability of or causes damage to, the
offended party or any third person.
77
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*The paper with the signature in blank must be
delivered by the offended party to the offender.
*Elements of estafa by means of deceit:
1. That there must be a false pretense,
fraudulent act or fraudulent means.
2. That such false pretense, fraudulent act
or fraudulent means must be made or
executed prior to or simultaneously
with the commission of the fraud.
3. That the offended party must have
relied on the false pretense, fraudulent
act, or fraudulent means, that is, he
induced to part with his money or
property because of the false pretense,
fraudulent act, or fraudulent means.
4. That as a result thereof, the offended
party suffered damage.
*Manipulation of scale is punished under
Revised Administrative Code.
*In false pretenses the deceit consists in the use
of deceitful words, in fraudulent acts the deceit
consists principally in deceitful acts.
*Estafa by postdating a check or issuing a
check in payment of an obligation
*Elements:
1. That the offender postdated a check, or
issued a check in payment of an
obligation.
2. That such postdating or issuing a check
was done when the offender had no
funds in the bank, or his funds
deposited therein where not sufficient
to cover the amount of the check.
*There is no deceit if the complainant was
aware of the fictitious nature of the pretense.
*The check issued must be genuine, and not
falsified.
*False pretenses and fraudulent representation
– there are three ways of committing estafa
under 315 2(a):
1. By using fictitious name
2. By falsely pretending to possess:
a. Power
b. Influence
c. Qualification
d. Property
e. Credit
f. Agency
g. Business
or
imaginary
transactions
3. By means of other similar deceits
*The check must be postdated or issued in
payment of an obligation constructed at the
time of the issuance and delivery of the check.
*Such false statement or fraudulent
representation constitutes the very cause or the
only motive which induces the complainant to
part with the thing.
*The offended party must be deprived of his
property by any of the false pretenses
mentioned in paragraph 2a.
*There must be notice of dishonor to the
offender, within 3 days the offender may pay
for him not to be charged.
*Estafa may be complexed to falsification of
public documents and commercial documents –
but not with private documents. -- The first
crime committed will be the proper crime to be
charged against the offender.
*When check is issued in substitution of a
promissory note it is in payment of pre-existing
obligation – there is no estafa.
*The accused must be able to obtain something
from the offended party be means of the check
he issues and delivers.
*When postdated checks are issued and
intended by the parties only as promissory
78
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
note, there is no estafa, even if there are no
sufficient funds in the bank to cover the same.
*Elements of the offense defined in the second
paragraph of section 1
*When check is issued by a guarantor, there is
no estafa.
1. That a person has sufficient funds in or
credit with the drawee bank when he
makes or draws and issues a check.
2. That he fails to keep sufficient funds or
to maintain a credit to cover the full
amount of the check if presented within
a period of 90 days from the date
appearing thereon.
3. That the check is dishonored by the
drawee bank.
*RA
eli i ated the ph ase the offe de
knowing that at the time he had no funds in the
a k .
*The drawer is given three days to make good
the said check by depositing the necessary
funds to cover the amount thereof. Otherwise,
a prima facie presumption will arise as to
existence of fraud, which is an element of the
crime of estafa.
*Good faith is a defense in a charge of estafa by
postdating or issuing a check.
*The person who received the check must be
damaged or prejudiced.
*The gravamen of BP22 is the issuance of a
worthless check, not the nonpayment of an
obligation.
*The law has made the mere act of issuing a
bum check a malum prohibitum.
*Check may only be draw for 6 months, beyond
that there is no crime.
BOUNCING CHECKS LAW - BP22
*Elements of the offense defined in the first
paragraph of section 1
1. That a person makes or draws and
issues any check.
2. That the check is made or drawn and
issued to apply on account or for value.
3. That the person who makes or draws
and issues the check knows at the time
of issue that he does not have sufficient
funds in or credit with the drawee bank
for the payment of such check in full
upon its presentment.
4. That the check is subsequently
dishonored by the drawee bank for
insufficiency of funds or credit, or
would have been dishonored for the
same reason had not the drawer,
without any valid reason, ordered the
bank to stop payment.
*BP22 requires that the person who made or
drew and issued the check knew at the time of
issuance that he did not have sufficient funds in
or credit with the drawee bank for the payment
of such check in full upon presentment.
*Lack of notice of dishonor is fatal – a mere oral
notice or demand to pay would appear to be
insufficient for conviction.
*Notice of dishonor to corporation is not notice
to officer who issued the check.
*Prima facie evidence of knowledge of
insufficiency of funds or credit, when the check
is presented within 90 days from the date of the
check. – Exceptions:
1. When the check is presented after 90
days from the date of the check.
2. When the maker or drawer pays the
holder thereof the amount due
thereon, or makes arrangements for
payment in full by the drawee of such
79
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
check within 5 banking days after
receiving notice that such check has not
been paid by the drawee.
*The element of knowledge of insufficiency of
funds or credit is not present and, thereof, the
crime does not exist, when the drawer either:
1. Pays the holder of check the amount
due thereof within five banking days
after receiving notice that such check
has not been paid by the drawee.
2. Makes arrangements for payment in full
by the drawee of such check within five
banking days after notice of nonpayment.
*Prima facie evidence does not arise where
notice of non-payment is not sent to the maker
or drawer of the check.
*The word credit as used herein shall be
construed to mean an arrangement or
undertaking with the bank for the payment of
such check (sec4)
*Prosecution under this act shall be without
prejudice to any liability for violation of any
provision of the Revised Penal Code. (Sec5) –
There is no double jeopardy if each statutes
requires proof of an additional fact which the
other does not.
*A drawer who was acquitted or convicted
under the Revised Penal Code for estafa may be
prosecuted under BP22.
*Estafa by inducing another to sign a
document
4. That prejudice be caused.
*Estafa by removing, concealing or destroying
documents
*Elements:
1. That there be court record, office files,
documents or any other papers.
2. That the offender removed, concealed
or destroyed any of them.
3. That the offender had intent to defraud
another.
*If there is no intent to defraud, the act of
destroying court record will be malicious
mischief.
*Elements of deceit and abuse of confidence as
means to commit estafa may co-exist.
*If there is no deceit, no abuse of confidence,
there is no estafa even if there is damage.
There is only civil liability.
*Damage or prejudice capable of pecuniary
estimation – second element of any form of
estafa.
*Elements of damage or prejudice
1. The offended party being deprived of
his money or property, as result of the
fraud.
2. Disturbance in property rights.
3. Temporary prejudice.
*Payment made subsequent to the commission
of estafa does not extinguish criminal liability or
reduce the penalty.
*Elements:
1. That the offender induced the offended
party to sign a document.
2. That deceit be employed to make him
sign the document.
3. That the offended party personally
signed the document.
80
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 316 – OTHER FORMS OF SWINDLING
*Paragraph 1 – By conveying, selling,
encumbering, or mortgaging any real property,
pretending to be the owner of the same
*Elements:
1. That the thing be immovable, such as a
parcel of land or a building.
2. That the offender who is not the owner
of said property should represent that
he is the owner thereof.
3. That the offender should have executed
an act of ownership.
4. That the act be made to the prejudice
of the owner or a third person.
*There must be existing real property.
*Deceit consisting in false pretense as to
ownership of the real property must be
employed by the offender.
*There must be damage or prejudice to a third
person or intent to cause damage or prejudice.
*Paragraph 2 – By disposing of real property as
free from encumbrance, although such
encumbrance be not recorded.
*Elements:
1. That the thing disposed of be real
property.
2. That the offender knew that the real
property was encumbered whether the
encumbrance is recorded or not.
3. That
there
must
be
express
representation by the offender that the
real property is free from encumbrance.
4. That the act of disposing of the real
property be made to the damage of
another.
*The offended party must have been deceived,
that is, he would not have granted the loan had
he known that the property was already
encumbered.
*When the third element is not established,
there is no crime.
*Paragraph 3 – By wrongfully taking by the
owner his personal property from its lawful
possession
*Elements:
1. That the offender is the owner of
personal property.
2. That said personal property is in lawful
possession of another.
3. That the offender wrongfully takes it
from its lawful possessor.
4. That prejudice is thereby caused to the
possessor or third person.
*The taking is wrongful when it is without the
consent of the possessor, or when deceit is
employed by the owner of the personal
property in inducing the possessor to give it to
him.
*Paragraph 4 – By executing any fictitious
contract to the prejudice of another
*Paragraph 5 – By accepting any compensation
for services not rendered or for labor not
performed.
*Malicious failure to return constitutes estafa in
this paragraph.
*Encumbrance – includes every right or interest
in the land which exists in favor of third
persons.
81
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Paragraph 6 – By selling, mortgaging or
encumbering real property or properties which
the offender guaranteed the fulfillment of his
obligation as surety
*Elements:
1. That the offender is a surety in a bond
given in a criminal or civil action.
2. That he guaranteed the fulfillment of
such obligation with his real property or
properties.
3. That he sells, mortgages, or in any
manner encumbers said real property.
4. That such sale, mortgage or
encumbrance is (a) without express
authority from the court, or (b) made
before the cancellation of his bond or
(c) before being relieved from the
obligation contracted by him.
ARTICLE 317 – SWINDLING A MINOR
*Elements:
1. That the offender takes advantage of
the inexperience or emotions or
feelings of a minor.
2. That he induces such minor (1) to
assume an obligation, or (2) to give
release, or (3) to execute a transfer of
any property right.
3. That the consideration is (1) some loan
of money, (2) credit, or (3) other
personal property.
4. That the transaction is to the detriment
of such minor.
ARTICLE 318 – OTHER DECEIT
1. By defrauding or damaging another by
any other deceit not mentioned in the
preceding articles.
2. By interpreting dreams, by making
forecasts, by telling fortunes, or by
taking advantage of the credulity of the
public in any other similar manner, for
profit or gain.
*Estafa by hiring and using public vehicle
without money to pay the fare*
ARTICLE 319 – REMOVAL, SALE OR PLEDGE OF
MORTGAGED PROPERTY
*Act punished:
1. By knowingly removing any personal
property mortgaged under the chattel
mortgage law to any province or city
other than the one in which it was
located at the time of the execution of
the mortgage, without the written
consent of the mortgagee or his
executors, administrators or assigns.
2. By selling or pledging personal property
already pledged, or any part thereof,
under the term of the chattel mortgage
law, without the consent of the
mortgagee written on the back of the
mortgage and noted on the record
thereof in the office of the register of
deeds of the province where such
property is located.
*Elements of knowingly removing mortgaged
personal property
1. That personal property is mortgaged
under the chattel mortgage law.
2. That the offender knows that such
property is mortgaged.
3. That he removes such mortgaged
personal property to any province or
city other than the one in which it was
located at the time of the execution of
the mortgage.
4. That the removal is permanent.
5. That there is no written consent of the
mortgagee
or
his
executors,
administrators or assigns to such
removal.
*If the chattel mortgage is not registered, no
violation.
82
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
d. Taking up the rails from a
railway track.
e. Maliciously changing railway
signals for the safety of moving
trains.
f. Destroying telegraph wires and
telegraph posts, or those of any
other system.
g. Using any other agency or
means of destruction as
effective as those above
enumerated.
*The removal of the mortgaged personal
property must be coupled with intent to
defraud.
*Elements of selling or pledging personal
property already pledged
1. That personal property is already
pledged under the terms of the chattel
mortgaged law.
2. That the offender, who is the
mortgagor of such property, sells or
pledges the same or any part thereof.
3. That there is no consent of the
mortgagee written on the back of the
mortgage and noted on the record
thereof in the office of the register of
deeds.
*The consent of the mortgagee must be (1) in
writing, (2) on the back of the mortgage and (3)
noted on the record thereof in the office of the
register of deeds.
*Crimes involving destruction as terrorism – a
person who o
its… the e
sowing and
creating a condition of widespread and
extraordinary fear and panic among the
populace, in order to coerce the government to
give in to an unlawful demand.
PD1613 – LAW ON ARSON
*Arson – malicious destruction of property by
fire.
*Damage is not necessary.
ARTICLE 320 – DESTRUCTIVE ARSON
*Malicious burning of structures, both public
and private, hotels, buildings, edifices, trains,
vessels, aircraft, factories and other military,
government or commercial establishments by
any person or group of persons.
ARTICLE
324
DESTRUCTION
–
CRIMES
INVOLVING
*Elements:
1. The offender causes destruction.
2. Destruction is caused by any of the
following means:
a. Explosion
b. Discharge of electric current
c. Inundation, sinking or stranding
of vessel, or intentional
damaging of the engine of said
vessel.
*Kinds of arson:
1. Simple arson
2. Destruction arson
3. Other cases of arson
*In attempted arson, it is not necessary that
there be a fire.
*Burning of houses, considered as simple arson
under PD1613 – inhabited house or dwelling.
*There is no complex crime of arson with
homicide – crime of homicide is absorbed.
ARTICLE 327 – WHO ARE LIABLE FOR
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF
*Elements:
1. That the offender deliberately caused
damage to the property of another.
2. That such act does not constitute arson
or other crimes involving destruction.
83
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
3. That the a t of da agi g a othe ’s
property be committed merely for the
sake of damaging it.
*Malicious Mischief – the willful damaging of
a othe ’s p ope t fo the sake of ausi g
damage due to hate, revenge or other evil
motives.
*This third element presupposes that the
offender acted due to hate revenge or other
evil motive.
*It is malicious mischief if the act of damaging
a othe ’s p ope t as i spi ed, ot hat ed
or by a desire for revenge, but by the mere
pleasure of destroying.
*If there is no malice in causing the damage,
the obligation to repair or pay for damages is
only civil.
*Damage means not only loss but also
di i utio of hat is a a ’s o .
*It is theft when there is intent to gain.
*A person charged with malicious mischief can
be found guilty of damage to property through
reckless imprudence.
ARTICLE 328 – SPECIAL CASES OF MALICIOUS
MISCHIEF
*The special cases of malicious mischief are:
1. Causing damage to obstruct the
performance of public functions.
2. Using any poisonous or corrosive
substance.
3. Spreading any infection or contagion
among cattle.
4. Causing damage to the property of the
Nation Museum or National Library, or
to any archives or registry, waterworks,
road, promenade, or any other thing
used in common by public.
*These are called qualified malicious mischief
ARTICLE 329 – OTHER MISCHIEFS
*Other mischiefs should not be included in
article 328.
ARTICLE 330 – DAMAGE AND OBSTRUCTION
TO MEANS OF COMMUNICATION
*Committed by damaging any railway,
telegraph or telephone lines.
*Not applicable where the telegraph or
telephone lines do not pertain to railways.
*When a person or persons are killed – if
without intent to kill – damage to means of
communication with homicide – if there is
intent – it is murder by means of derailment.
ARTICLE 331 – DESTROYING OR DAMAGING
STATUES, PUBLIC MONUMENTS, OR PAINTING
ARTICLE 332 – PERSONS EXEMPT FROM
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
*Crimes involved in the exemption:
1. Theft
2. Swindling
3. Malicious mischief
*Persons exempted from criminal liability:
1. Spouses, ascendants and descendants,
or relative by affinity in the same line.
2. The widowed spouse with respect to
the property which belonged to the
deceased spouse before the same
passed into the possession of another.
3. Brother and sisters and brother-in-law
and sister-in-law, if living together.
*No criminal, only civil liability.
*Must be committed or caused mutually by the
persons mentioned in article 332.
84
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*This article does not apply to stranger who
participates in the commission of the crime.
*Stepfather, adopted father, natural children,
concubine and paramour are included.
*Common law spouse exempted.
ARTICLE 333 – WHO ARE GUILTY OF ADULTERY
*Elements:
1. That the woman is married.
2. That she has sexual intercourse with a
man not her husband.
3. That as regards the man with whom she
had sexual intercourse, he know her to
be married.
*Not necessary if marriage is void, valid or
voidable.
*The offended party must be legally married to
the offender at the time of the criminal act.
*There is adultery, even if the marriage of the
guilty woman with the offended husband is
subsequently declared void.
*the crime of adultery is an instantaneous
crime which is consummated and completed at
the moment of the carnal union. Each sexual
intercourse constitutes the crime of adultery.
*Only the husband may file the case.
*The essence of adultery is the violation of the
marital vows.
*The gist of the crime of adultery is the danger
of introducing spurious heirs into the family.
*If the married woman is guilty of adultery. If
she knew the man was married, she would be
liable for concubinage also.
*Effect of pardon:
1. The pardon must come before the
institution of the criminal prosecution.
2. Both the offender must be pardoned by
the offended party.
*Act of intercourse between offender and her
husband subsequent to adulterous conduct is
an implied pardon.
ARTICLE 334 – CONCUBINAGE
*Three ways of committing the crime of
concubinage:
1. By keeping a mistress in the conjugal
dwelling.
2. By having sexual intercourse, under
scandalous circumstances, with a
woman who is not his wife.
3. By cohabiting with her in any other
place.
*Elements:
1. That the man must be married.
2. That he committed any of the following
acts:
a. By keeping a mistress in the
conjugal dwelling.
b. Having sexual intercourse under
scandalous circumstances with
a woman who is not his wife.
c. Cohabiting with her in any
other place.
3. That as regards the woman, she must
know him to be married.
*Concubinage is a violation of the marital vows.
*Abandonment without justification is not
exempting, but only mitigating circumstance.
*The man, to be guilty of adultery, must have
knowledge of the married status of the woman.
*A married man is not liable for concubinage for
mere sexual relations with a woman not his
wife.
85
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Conjugal dwelling – home of the husband and
wife even if the wife is temporarily absent on
any account.
*Motive of lascivious acts is not important
because the essence of lewdness is in the very
act itself.
*Cohabit – dwell together, in the manner of
husband and wife, for some period of time.
*E
a i g, kissi g a d holdi g gi l’s east is
act of lasciviousness. – some cases – only unjust
vexation.
*A person who keeps a mistress in an
apartment furnished by him is not guilty of
concubinage if he does not live or sleep with
her in said apartment.
*Adultery is more severely punished than
concubinage – because adultery makes possible
the i t odu tio of a othe a ’s lood i to
the family.
ARTICLE 336 – ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS
*Elements:
1. That the offender commits any act of
lasciviousness or lewdness.
2. That the act of lasciviousness is
committed against a person of either
sex.
3. That it is done under any of the
following circumstances:
a. By using force or intimidation.
b. When the offended party is
deprived of reason or otherwise
unconscious.
c. By means of fraudulent
machination or grave abuse of
authority.
d. When the offended party is
under 12 years of age or is
demented.
*Lewd – obscene, lustful, indecent. It signifies
the form of immorality which has relation to
moral impurity.
*Compelling a girl to dance naked before men
in an act of lasciviousness, even if the dominant
motive is revenge, for her failure to pay a debt.
*Kissing and embracing a woman against her
will are acts of lasciviousness when prompted
by lust or lewd design.
*Lo e ’s e
a es a d kisses a e ot a ts of
lasciviousness – no evidence that his conduct
was lewd or lascivious.
*Attempted rape vs. acts of lasciviousness
1. If the act performed by the offender
clearly indicate that his purpose was to
lie with the offended woman, it is
attempted rape.
2. In case of attempted rape, the
lascivious acts are preparatory acts to
the commission of rape, whereas, in the
other, the lascivious acts are
themselves the final objective sought by
the offender.
*Desistance in the commission of attempted
rape may constitute acts of lasciviousness.
*No attempted and frustrated crime of acts of
lasciviousness.
ARTICLE 337 – QUALIFIED SEDUCTION
*Seduction – enticing a woman to unlawful
sexual intercourse by promise of marriage or
other means of persuasion without use of force.
*Two classes of qualified seduction:
1. Seduction of a virgin over 12 years and
under 18 years of age by certain
persons, such as, a person in authority,
priest, teacher, etc.
86
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
2. Seduction of a sister by her brother, or
descendant by her ascendant regardless
of her age or reputation.
*Elements of qualified seduction of a virgin:
1. That the offended party is a virgin,
which is presumed if she is unmarried
and of good reputation.
2. She must be over 12 and under 18 years
of age.
3. That the offender has sexual
intercourse with her.
4. That there is abuse of authority,
confidence or relationship on the part
of the offender.
*There must be sexual intercourse in qualified
seduction, if none, only acts of lasciviousness.
*Offender in qualified seduction:
1. Those who abused their authority:
a. Person in public authority
b. Guardian
c. Teachers
d. Person who, in any capacity, is
entrusted with the education or
custody of the woman seduced.
2. Those who abused confidence reposed
in them:
a. Priest
b. House servant
c. Domestic
3. Those who abused their relationship
a. Brother who seduced his sister
b. Ascendants who seduced his
descendants
*Deceit is not an element of qualified
seduction.
*The fact that the girl consented to the sexual
intercourse is not a defense.
ARTICLE 338 – SIMPLE SEDUCTION
*Elements:
1. That the offended party is over 12 and
under 18 years of age.
2. That she must be of good reputation,
single or widow.
3. That the offender has sexual
intercourse with her.
4. That it is committed by means of deceit.
ARTICLE 339 – ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS WITH
THE CONSENT OF THE OFFENDED PARTY
*Elements:
1. That the offender commits acts of
lasciviousness.
2. That the acts are committed upon a
woman who is virgin or single or widow
of good reputation, under 18 years of
age but over 12 years, or a sister or
descendant regardless of her reputation
or age.
3. That the offender accomplishes the acts
by abuse of authority, confidence,
relationship, or deceit.
*Male cannot be the offended party in this
crime.
*Committed by the same persons under the
same circumstances as those provided in article
337 and 338.
ARTICLE 340 – CURROPTION OF MINORS
*Any person who shall promote or facilitate the
prostitution or corruption of persons under age
to satisfy the lust of another.
*mere proposal will consummate the offense.
*Child prostitution RA 7610
*The accused charged with rape cannot be
convicted of qualified seduction under the same
information.
87
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 341 – WHITE SLAVE TRADE
ARTICLE 343 – CONSENTED ABDUCTION
*Acts punished:
*Elements:
1. Engaging in the business of prostitution.
2. Profiting by prostitution
3. Enlisting the services of woman for the
purpose of prostitution.
ARTICLE 342 – FORCIBLE ABDUCTION
*Elements:
1. That the person abducted is any
woman, regardless of her age, civil
status or reputation.
2. That the abduction is against her will.
3. That the abduction is with lewd design
*Abduction – taking away a woman from her
house or the place where she may be for the
purpose of carrying her to another place with
intent to marry or corrupt her.
*If the female abducted is under 12 years of
age, the crime is forcible abduction, even if she
voluntarily goes with her abductor
*When there are several defendants, it is
enough that one of them had lewd designs.
*Husband not liable for abduction of his wife as
lewd design is wanting.
*Sexual intercourse is not necessary in forcible
abduction.
*When there is deprivation of liberty and no
lewd designs, it is kidnapping and serious illegal
detention.
*There can only be one complex crime of
forcible abduction with rape when forcible
abduction is followed by several acts of rape.
*Rape may absorb forcible abduction if the
main objective was to rape the victim.
1. That the offended party must be a
virgin.
2. That she must be over 12 and under 18
years of age.
3. That the taking away of the offended
party must be with her consent, after
solicitation or cajolery from the
offender.
4. That the taking away of the offended
party must be with lewd designs.
*Virginity – referred under this article is not to
be understood in so material sense as to
exclude the idea of abduction of a virtuous
woman of good reputation.
ARTICLE 344 – PROSECUTION OF THE CRIMES
OF ADULTERY, CONCUBINAGE, SEDUCTION,
ABDUCTION,
RAPE
AND
ACTS
OF
LASCIVIOUSNES
ARTICLE 345 – CIVIL LIABILITY OF PERSONS
GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST CHASTITY
Person guilty of rape, seduction, or abduction,
shall also be sentenced:
1. To indemnify the offended woman.
2. To acknowledge the offspring, unless the law
should prevent him from so doing.
3. In every case to support the offspring.
The adulterer and the concubine in the case
provided for in Articles 333 and 334 may also be
sentenced, in the same proceeding or in a
separate civil proceeding, to indemnify for
damages caused to the offended spouse.
ARTICLE 346 – LIABILITY OF ASCENDANTS,
GUARDIANS, TEACHERS, OR OTHER PERSONS
ENTRUSTED WITH THE CUSTODY OF THE
OFFENDED PARTY
The ascendants, guardians, curators, teachers,
and any person who, by abuse of authority or
88
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
confidential relationships, shall cooperate as
accomplices in the perpetration of the crimes
embraced in chapters second, third, and fourth,
of this title, shall be punished as principals.
Teachers or other persons in any other capacity
entrusted with the education and guidance of
youth, shall also suffer the penalty of temporary
special disqualification in its maximum period to
perpetual special disqualification.
ARTICLE 348 – USURPATION OF CIVIL STATUS
The penalty of prison mayor shall be imposed
upon any person who shall usurp the civil status
of another, should he do so for the purpose of
defrauding the offended part or his heirs;
otherwise, the penalty of prison correctional in
its medium and maximum periods shall be
imposed.
ARTICLE 349 – BIGAMY
Any person falling within the terms of this
article, and any other person guilty of
corruption of minors for the benefit of another,
shall be punished by special disqualification
from filling the office of guardian.
ARTICLE 347 – SIMULATION OF BIRTHS,
SUBSTITUTION OF ONE CHILD FOR ANOTHER
AND CONCEALMENT OR ABANDONMENT OF A
LEGITIMATE CHILD
The simulation of births and the substitution of
one child for another shall be punished by
prison mayor and a fine of not exceeding 1,000
pesos.
The same penalties shall be imposed upon any
person who shall conceal or abandon any
legitimate child with intent to cause such child
to lose its civil status.
Any physician or surgeon or public officer who,
in violation of the duties of his profession or
office, shall cooperate in the execution of any of
the crimes mentioned in the two next preceding
paragraphs, shall suffer the penalties therein
prescribed and also the penalty of temporary
special disqualification.
*Acts punished:
1. Simulation of births.
2. Substitution of one child for another.
3. Concealing
or
abandoning
any
legitimate child with intent to cause
such child to lose its civil status.
The penalty of prison mayor shall be imposed
upon any person who shall contract a second or
subsequent marriage before the former
marriage has been legally dissolved, or before
the absent spouse has been declared
presumptively dead by means of a judgment
rendered in the proper proceedings.
*Elements:
1. That the offender has been legally
married.
2. That the marriage has not been legally
dissolved or, in case his or her spouse is
absent, the absent spouse could not yet
be presumed dead according to the Civil
Code.
3. That he contracts a second or
subsequent marriage.
4. That the second or subsequent
marriage has all the essential requisites
for validity.
ARTICLE 350 – MARRIAGE CONTRACTED
AGAINST PROVISIONS OF LAW
*Elements:
1. That the offender contracted marriage.
2. That he knew at the time that:
a. The requirements of the law
were not complied with; or
b. The marriage was in disregard
of a legal impediment.
89
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 351 – PREMATURE MARRIAGES
Any widow who shall marry within three
hundred and one day from the date of the
death of her husband, or before having
delivered if she shall have been pregnant at the
time of his death, shall be punished by arrest
mayor and a fine not exceeding 500 pesos.
The same penalties shall be imposed upon any
woman whose marriage shall have been
annulled or dissolved, if she shall marry before
her delivery or before the expiration of the
period of three hundred and one day after the
legal separation.
ARTICLE 352 – PERFORMANCE OF ILLEGAL
MARRIAGE CEREMONY
Priests or ministers of any religious
denomination or sect, or civil authorities who
shall perform authorize any illegal marriage
ceremony shall be punished in accordance with
the provisions of the Marriage Law.
5. That the imputation must tend to cause
the dishonor, discredit or contempt of
the person defamed.
ARTICLE 354 – REQUIREMENT FOR PUBLICITY
Every defamatory imputation is presumed to be
malicious, even if it be true, if no good intention
and justifiable motive for making it is shown,
except in the following cases:
1. A private communication made by any
person to another in the performance of any
legal, moral, or social duty; and
2. A fair and true report, made in good faith,
without any comments or remarks, of any
judicial, legislative, or other official proceedings
which are not of confidential nature, or of any
statement, report or speech delivered in said
proceedings, or of any other act performed by
public officers in the exercise of their functions.
ARTICLE 355 – LIBEL BY MEANS OF WRITINGS
OR SIMILAR MEANS
ARTICLE 353 – DEFINITION OF LIBEL
*Libel may be committed by means of:
*A libel is public and malicious imputation of a
crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary,
or any act, omission, condition, status, or
circumstance tending to cause the dishonor,
discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical
person, or to blacken the memory of one who is
dead.
*Elements of defamation:
1. That there must be an imputation of a
crime, or of a vice or defect, real or
imaginary, or any act, omission, status
or circumstance.
2. That the imputation must be made
publicly.
3. That it must be malicious.
4. That the imputation must be directed
to a natural or juridical person, or one
who is dead.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Writing
Printing
Lithography
Engraving
Radio
Phonograph
Painting
Theatrical exhibition
Cinematographic exhibition
Or any similar means
ARTICLE 356 – THREATENING TO PUBLISH AND
OFFER TO PREVENT SUCH PUBLICATION FOR
COMPENSATION
*Acts punished:
1. By threatening another to publish a
libel concerning him, or his parents,
90
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
spouse, child, or other members of his
family.
2. By offering to prevent the publication of
such libel for compensation, or money
consideration.
ARTICLE 357 – PROHIBITED PUBLICATION OF
ACTS REFERRED TO IN THE COURSE OF
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS
2. That such act is performed in the
presence of other person or persons.
3. That such act casts dishonor, discredit
or contempt upon the offended party.
*Kinds of slander by deed:
1. Simple slander by deed
2. Grave slander by deed
ARTICLE 360 – PERSONS RESPONSIBLE
*Elements:
*Persons responsible for libel are:
1. That the offender is a reporter, editor
or manager of a newspaper daily or
magazine.
2. That he publishes facts connected with
the private life of another.
3. That such facts are offensive to the
honor, virtue and reputation of said
person.
ARTICLE 358 – SLANDER (Oral defamation)
*Slander is libel committed by oral means,
instead of in writing.
*Kinds of oral defamation:
1. Simple slander
2. Grave slander, when it is of serious and
insulting nature.
*There is oral defamation, even if other persons
and not the offended party heard the
slanderous words.
ARTICLE 359 – SLANDER BY DEED
*Slander by deed is a crime against honor which
is committed by performing any act which casts
dishonor, discredit, or contempt upon another
person.
*Elements:
1. That the offender performs any act not
included in any other crime against
honor.
1. The person who publishes, exhibits or
causes the publication or exhibition of
any defamation in writing or similar
means.
2. The author or editor of a book or
pamphlet.
3. The editor or business manager of a
daily newspaper magazine or serial
publication.
4. The owner of the printing plant which
publishes a libelous article with his
consent and all other persons who in
any way participate in or have
connection with its publication. (US vs.
Ortiz)
ARTICLE 361 – PROOF OF THE TRUTH
In every criminal prosecution for libel, the truth
may be given in evidence to the court and if it
appears that the matter charged as libelous is
true, and, moreover, that it was published with
good motives and for justifiable ends, the
defendants shall be acquitted.
Proof of the truth of an imputation of an act or
omission not constituting a crime shall not be
admitted, unless the imputation shall have been
made against Government employees with
respect to facts related to the discharge of their
official duties.
In such cases, if the defendant proves the truth
of the imputation made by him, he shall be
acquitted.
91
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
ARTICLE 362 – LIBELOUS REMARKS
Libelous remarks or comments connected with
the matter privileged under the provisions of
Article 354, if made with malice, shall not
exempt the author thereof nor the editor or
managing editor of a newspaper from criminal
liability.
ARTICLE 363 – INCRIMINATIONG INNOCENT
PERSON
Any person who, by any act not constituting
perjury, shall directly incriminate or impute to
an innocent person the commission of a crime,
shall be punished by arresto menor.
*Elements:
1. That the offender performs an act.
2. That by such act he directly incriminates
or imputes to an innocent person the
commission of a crime.
3. That such act does not constitute
perjury.
ARTICLE 364 – INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR
The penalty of arresto menor or fine not
exceeding 200 pesos shall be imposed for any
intrigue which has for its principal purpose to
blemish the honor or reputation of a person.
ARTICLE 365 – IMPRUDENCE AND NEGLIGENCE
*Quasi-offenses under
committed in four ways:
Article
365
are
1. By committing through reckless
imprudence any act which, had it been
intentional, would constitute a grave or
less grave felony or light felony.
2. By
committing
through
simple
imprudence or negligence an act which
would otherwise constitute a grave or a
less serious felony.
3. By causing damage to the property of
another through reckless imprudence
or simple imprudence or negligence.
4. By causing through simple imprudence
or negligence some wrong which, if
done
maliciously,
would
have
constituted a light felony.
*Imprudence or negligence is the crime itself –
not simply a way of committing a crime. (Atty.
Mercader) (Ivler vs. San Pedro)
*Imprudence or negligence simply a way of
committing a crime – ABANDONED DOCTRINE.
*Reckless imprudence – consists in voluntarily,
but without malice, doing or failing to do an act
from which material damage results by reason
of inexcusable lack of precaution on the part of
the person performing or failing to perform
such act, taking into consideration his
employment or occupation, degree of
intelligence, physical condition and other
circumstances regarding persons, time and
place.
*Simple imprudence – consists in the lack of
precaution displayed in those cases in which the
damage impending to be caused is not
immediate nor the danger clearly manifest.
*Elements of reckless imprudence:
1. That the offender does or fails to do an
act.
2. That the doing of or the failure to do
that act is voluntary.
3. That it be without malice.
4. That material damage results.
5. That there is inexcusable lack of
precaution on the party of the offender,
taking into consideration –
a. His employment or occupation;
b. Degree of intelligence, physical
condition; and
c. Other circumstances regarding
persons, time and place.
92
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017
CRIMINAL LAW II
*Elements of simple imprudence:
1. That there is lack of precaution on the
part of the offender.
2. That the damage impending to be
caused is not immediate or the danger
is not clearly manifest.
***BASED – LUIS B. REYES RPC BOOK TWO***
93
SIRON, JUAN
SY2016-2017