Slide 1:
Introduce yourself and greet teacher
Slide 2:
So , these are the research objectives , we tried to achieve during our analysis.
The first is : To assess the level of values of volunteerism, social norms, perceived well-being
and sustainability intention among the youth.
The second objective is : To compare one of the following factors (level of values of
volunteerism, social norms, perceived well-being or sustainability intention) across gender.
The third is : To determine the relationship values of volunteerism, social norms, perceived
well-being and sustainability intention as an environmental volunteer .
The last and fourth is : To analyze the contribution of values of volunteerism, social norms,
perceived well-being and sustainability intention as an environmental volunteer .
Slide 3:
As we discussed the Research objectives in our previous slide , Let us look at the questions
which we’ll be answering in this research later on.
The first question is: What is the level of values of volunteerism, social norms, perceived
well-being and sustainability intention among the youth?
The second Question is to find out if: Are there differences in social norms across gender?
The third is to see : if there is a significant relationship between values of volunteerism,
social norms, perceived well-being or sustainability intention?
The last and fourth is to find out if : There is a significant contribution of values of
volunteerism, social norms, perceived well-being or sustainability intention?
Slide 4:
Let us look at the research Hypothesis :
For the purpose of research, we hypothesized 3 Hypothesis ,:
•
•
•
H01: There are no significant differences in social norms across gender.
H1: There are significant differences in social norms across gender.
H02: There is no significant relationship between values of volunteerism, social
norms, perceived well-being or sustainability intention
•
•
•
H2: There is significant relationship between values of volunteerism, social norms,
perceived well-being or sustainability intention
H03: There is no significant contribution of values of volunteerism, social norms,
perceived well-being or sustainability intention
H3: There is significant contribution of values of volunteerism, social norms,
perceived well-being or sustainability intention
Slide 5:
Now let us discuss the answers to the questions which we aimed to find in this research.
Q1: : What is the level of values of volunteerism, social norms, perceived well-being, and
sustainability intention among the youth?
To answer this question, we found out the descriptive statistics of the respondents.
The results can be seen in the Table #1 :
N here denoted the total number of respondents , for each Values, Norms , intention, and
Wellbeing.
The minimum and maximum values for each can be seen , For Values its 2.63 , Norms it’s
1.50 , for intention it’s 1.31 and for wellbeing its 1.38
Number of respondents involved in the study were 356.
The details in table#1 show that overall environmental volunteering values, society norms,
the intention for sustainability and perceived well-being was high.
The highest mean was scored for wellbeing (mean = 4.611; s.d= 0.468) followed by values
(mean=4.593; sd=0.427) and intention (mean= 4.430; sd=0.596) while Norms the lowest
mean score (4.070 ; sd=0.664)
Slide 6:
Let’s move on to the next question :
Q2: Are there differences in social norms across gender?
To answer this question, we applied Independent T test , the results obtained can be seen in
the tables attached in the slide:
•
The results in the table shows that there was no significant difference in the aspect
of social norms across gender (t= -0.735 , p = 0.160 > 0.05).
•
It can be seen the mean score of the females with respect to social norms was higher
compared to the males.
Slide 7:
Let’s move on to the next question :
Q3: Is there a significant relationship between values of volunteerism, social norms,
perceived well-being or sustainability intention?
To answer this question, we applied ANOVA test , the results obtained can be seen in the
table.
•
The findings of the one-way ANOVA test showed that there were no significant
differences in the three aspects examined :environmental volunteering values,
society norms and perceived well-being.
•
but the intention for sustainability is significant
Slide 8:
Let’s move on to our last question :
Q4: Is there a significant contribution of values of volunteerism, social norms, perceived
well-being or sustainability intention?
To answer this question, we used Pearson Correlation , the results obtained can be seen in
the table.
•
•
•
•
•
•
The correlation between values and norms is (0.518) that means moderate.
The correlation between values and intention is (0.668) that means strong
The correlation between values and wellbeing (0.743) that means strong
The correlation between Norms and Intention is ( 0.556) that means moderate
The correlation between Norms and Wellbeing is (0.475) that means moderate
The correlation between intention Wellbeing is (0.783) that means strong
Slide 9 :
Thank you