- No category
CSR, Commitment, Justice: Statistical Analysis
advertisement
1. Prepare a frequency table of the profile of the respondents. Gender Cumulative Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Percent Female 264 28.6 28.6 28.6 Male 658 71.4 71.4 100.0 Total 922 100.0 100.0 Age Cumulative Frequency Valid Percent Valid Percent Percent 30-40 228 24.7 24.7 24.7 40-50 278 30.2 30.2 54.9 50-60 141 15.3 15.3 70.2 Below 30 275 29.8 29.8 100.0 Total 922 100.0 100.0 MaritalStatus Cumulative Frequency Valid Married Percent Valid Percent Percent 337 36.6 36.6 36.6 53 5.7 5.7 42.3 Single 532 57.7 57.7 100.0 Total 922 100.0 100.0 Separated 2. Prepare a correlation table of the main variables Correlations Gendernum Gendernum Pearson Correlation agenum 1 Sig. (2-tailed) N 922 marnum .041 -.021 .219 .531 922 922 agenum marnum .315** Pearson Correlation .041 Sig. (2-tailed) .219 N 922 922 922 -.021 .315** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .531 .000 N 922 922 Pearson Correlation 1 .000 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). 3. There is a significant difference of the respondents’ ICSR perceptions when group according to gender. Group Statistics Gendernum InternalCSR N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Female 264 4.4879 .70296 .04326 Male 658 4.4058 .70331 .02742 There is no significant difference of the respondents’ ICSR perceptions when group according to gender because 0.326 is greater than 0.05. accept null. 4. There is no significant difference of the respondents’ organizational commitment when group according to age. ANOVA OrganizationalCommitment Sum of Squares df Mean Square Between Groups 100.906 3 33.635 Within Groups 687.539 918 .749 Total 788.445 921 F 44.910 Sig. .000 There is a significant difference of the respondents’ organizational commitment when group according to age because the significance of 0.000 is lesser than 0.05. 5. There is a significant difference of the respondents’ organizational justice when group according to marital status. ANOVA OrganizatinalJustice Sum of Squares Between Groups df Mean Square 19.582 2 9.791 Within Groups 443.324 919 .482 Total 462.905 921 F Sig. 20.296 .000 There is a significant difference of the respondents’ organizational justice when group according to marital status because 0.000 is lesser than 0.05 6. Internal CSR positively affects organizational commitment Correlations OrganizationalC InternalCSR InternalCSR Pearson Correlation ommitment 1 Sig. (2-tailed) N OrganizationalCommitment Pearson Correlation .801** .000 922 922 .801** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Internal CSR very strongly positively affects organizational commitment because .801 is positive 7. External CSR negatively affects organizational commitment Correlations OrganizationalC ommitment OrganizationalCommitment Pearson Correlation ExternalCSR .750** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N ExternalCSR Pearson Correlation 922 922 .750** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). External CSR strongly positively affects organizational commitment because 0.750 is positive 8. Internal CSR positively affects organizational Justice Correlations OrganizatinalJus InternalCSR InternalCSR Pearson Correlation tice 1 Sig. (2-tailed) N OrganizatinalJustice Pearson Correlation .942** .000 922 922 .942** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Internal CSR very strongly positively affects organizational Justice because 0.942 is positive 9. External CSR negatively affects organizational Justice Correlations OrganizatinalJus tice OrganizatinalJustice Pearson Correlation ExternalCSR .898** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) N ExternalCSR Pearson Correlation .000 922 922 .898** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). External CSR very strongly positively affects organizational Justice because 0.898 is positive 10. Procedural justice has no significant effect on organizational commitment Correlations OrganizationalC ProceduralJustic ommitment OrganizationalCommitment Pearson Correlation e 1 Sig. (2-tailed) N ProceduralJustice Pearson Correlation .761** .000 922 922 .761** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Procedural justice has a positive strong significant effect on organizational commitment 11. Distributive justice has no significant effect on organizational commitment Correlations DistributiveJustice DistributiveJusti OrganizationalC ce ommitment Pearson Correlation 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N OrganizationalCommitment .809** Pearson Correlation 922 922 .809** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Distributive justice has a very strong positive significant effect on organizational commitment of 0.809 12. Interactional justice has a significant positive effect on organizational commitment Correlations InteractionalJustice Pearson Correlation InteractionalJust OrganizationalC ice ommitment 1 Sig. (2-tailed) N OrganizationalCommitment Pearson Correlation .775** .000 922 922 .775** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Interactional justice has a significant strong positive effect on organizational commitment because .775 is positive 13. Organizational justice has a significant negative effect on organizational commitment Correlations OrganizationalC OrganizatinalJus ommitment OrganizationalCommitment Pearson Correlation tice .853** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N OrganizatinalJustice Pearson Correlation 922 922 .853** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) .000 N 922 922 **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). Organizational justice has a significant very strong positive effect on organizational commitment because 0.853 is positive 14. What are the predictors of organizational commitment? (list down all the models; exclude organizational justice in the analysis) ANOVAa Model 1 2 3 Sum of Squares Regression df Mean Square 61.954 1 61.954 Residual 726.491 920 .790 Total 788.445 921 69.254 2 34.627 Residual 719.191 919 .783 Total 788.445 921 72.397 3 24.132 Residual 716.048 918 .780 Total 788.445 921 Regression Regression F Sig. 78.456 .000b 44.247 .000c 30.939 .000d a. Dependent Variable: OrganizationalCommitment b. Predictors: (Constant), marnum c. Predictors: (Constant), marnum, agenum d. Predictors: (Constant), marnum, agenum, Gendernum Coefficientsa Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1 B (Constant) Std. Error 4.705 .074 Coefficients Beta t 63.312 Sig. .000 2 3 marnum -.274 .031 (Constant) 4.838 .086 marnum -.242 .032 agenum -.081 .027 (Constant) 5.059 .139 marnum -.245 .032 agenum -.078 Gendernum -.129 -.280 -8.858 .000 56.301 .000 -.248 -7.480 .000 -.101 -3.054 .002 36.331 .000 -.251 -7.559 .000 .026 -.098 -2.956 .003 .064 -.063 -2.008 .045 a. Dependent Variable: OrganizationalCommitment Model 1 predictor: Marital status Model 2 predictor: Marital status and age Model 3 predictor: Marital status, Age and Gender Excluded Variablesa Collinearity Model 1 2 Beta In t Sig. Partial Statistics Correlation Tolerance Gendernum -.068b -2.148 .032 -.071 1.000 agenum -.101b -3.054 .002 -.100 .901 Gendernum -.063c -2.008 .045 -.066 .997 a. Dependent Variable: OrganizationalCommitment b. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), marnum c. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), marnum, agenum 15. Internal and external CSR perceptions jointly predict organizational justice ANOVAa Model 1 Sum of Squares Regression Mean Square 410.802 1 410.802 52.103 920 .057 Total 462.905 921 Regression 421.973 2 210.986 40.932 919 .045 Residual 2 df Residual F Sig. 7253.603 .000b 4736.982 .000c Total 462.905 921 a. Dependent Variable: OrganizatinalJustice b. Predictors: (Constant), InternalCSR c. Predictors: (Constant), InternalCSR, ExternalCSR Coefficientsa Standardized Unstandardized Coefficients Model 1 2 B Std. Error Beta (Constant) .114 .050 InternalCSR .949 .011 -.179 .048 InternalCSR .670 .020 ExternalCSR .342 .022 (Constant) Coefficients t Sig. 2.277 .023 85.168 .000 -3.736 .000 .665 33.175 .000 .318 15.837 .000 .942 a. Dependent Variable: OrganizatinalJustice Excluded Variablesa Collinearity Model 1 Beta In ExternalCSR .318b t 15.837 Sig. .000 Partial Statistics Correlation Tolerance .463 .239 a. Dependent Variable: OrganizatinalJustice b. Predictors in the Model: (Constant), InternalCSR Internal and external CSR perceptions jointly predict organizational justice only in model 2 because InternalCSR predicts organizational justice in model 1.
0
advertisement
Download
advertisement
Add this document to collection(s)
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersAdd this document to saved
You can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users