1. Consider three nearest-neighbor spins each of magnitude ๐บ on a line, as shown, coupled by the
Heisenberg interaction:
ฬ๐ . (๐บ
ฬ๐−๐ + ๐บ
ฬ๐+๐ )
๐ผ = −๐๐ฑ๐บ
Show that the dispersion for spin waves in one dimension is
โ๐ = ๐๐ฑ๐บ(๐ − ๐๐๐ ๐๐).
Dispersion Relation is the relationship between ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐. The relation is basically about how the angular
frequency varies with the wave vector. The underline concept is when the spins are inclined at an angle to
each other, they exert torque on each other.
Considering the spin at site p in one dimensional chain, we know from mechanics, the rate of change of
the angular momentum is equal to the torque which acts on the spin.
โ
๐๐๐
= ๐๐ × ๐ต๐
๐๐ก
(๐)
The magnetic moment at site p is given by
๐๐ = −๐๐๐ต ๐๐
(๐)
Taking into account the Heisenberg exchange interaction, which says that the interaction is only between
the nearest neighbors. That is, ๐๐ can interact only with ๐๐+1 ๐๐๐ ๐๐−1 . And the interaction with other
spins will be zero.
Taking the above assumption about the Heisenberg interaction, the exchange energy will be given as
๐ = −2๐ฝ๐๐ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 )
(๐)
From equation (2), ๐๐ is given as
๐๐ =
−๐๐
๐๐๐ต
(๐)
Substituting equation (4) in to equation (3)
๐=
2๐ฝ๐๐
+ ๐๐+1 )
(๐
๐๐๐ต ๐−1
(๐)
We also know that energy is given by
๐ = −๐๐ โ ๐ต๐
(๐)
Equating equation (6) and equation (5), we have
−๐๐ โ ๐ต๐ =
2๐ฝ๐๐
+ ๐๐+1 )
(๐
๐๐๐ต ๐−1
(๐)
From equation (7), the value of (๐ต๐ ) magnetic field at site p can be given as
๐ต๐ =
−2๐ฝ
+ ๐๐+1 )
(๐
๐๐๐ต ๐−1
Putting equation (8) and equation (2) in to equation (1) gives us
(๐)
โ
๐๐๐
−2๐ฝ
= (−๐๐๐ต ๐๐ ) × (
+ ๐๐+1 ))
(๐
๐๐ก
๐๐๐ต ๐−1
(๐)
Simplifying equation (9), we have
๐๐๐ 2๐ฝ
= (๐๐ × ๐๐−1 + ๐๐ × ๐๐+1 )
๐๐ก
โ
(๐๐)
To solve equation (10), let first solve ๐๐ × ๐๐−1
In Cartesian coordinate
๐๐ × ๐๐−1
๐ฬ
๐ฅ
= | ๐๐
๐ฅ
๐๐−1
๐ฬ
๐ฆ
๐๐
๐ฆ
๐๐−1
๐ฬ
๐๐๐ง |
๐ง
๐๐−1
๐ฆ ๐ง
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ฆ ๐ฅ
๐ง
๐ฅ
๐๐ × ๐๐−1 = ๐ฬ(๐๐ ๐๐−1
− ๐๐๐ง ๐๐−1 ) − ๐ฬ(๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐−1
− ๐๐๐ง ๐๐−1
) + ๐ฬ (๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐−1 − ๐๐ ๐๐−1
)
(๐๐)
Similarly for ๐๐ × ๐๐+1
๐๐ × ๐๐−1
๐ฬ
= | ๐๐๐ฅ
๐ฅ
๐๐+1
๐ฆ
๐ฬ
๐ฆ
๐๐
๐ฆ
๐๐+1
๐ฬ
๐๐๐ง |
๐ง
๐๐+1
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ง
๐ง
๐ฅ
๐ฅ
๐๐ × ๐๐+1 = ๐ฬ(๐๐ ๐๐+1
− ๐๐๐ง ๐๐+1 ) − ๐ฬ(๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐+1
− ๐๐๐ง ๐๐+1
) + ๐ฬ (๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐+1 − ๐๐ ๐๐+1
)
(๐๐)
Substituting equation (11) and equation (12) back into equation (10), we have
๐๐๐ 2๐ฝ
๐ฆ ๐ง
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ง
๐ง
๐ง
๐ฅ
๐ฅ
= {๐ฬ(๐๐ (๐๐−1
+ ๐๐+1
) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 )) − ๐ฬ(๐๐๐ฅ (๐๐−1
+ ๐๐+1
) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1
+ ๐๐+1
))
๐๐ก
โ
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ฅ
๐ฅ
+ ๐ฬ (๐๐๐ฅ (๐
+ ๐ ) − ๐๐ (๐๐−1
+ ๐๐+1
(๐๐)
))}
๐−1
๐+1
If we put it in component form
๐๐๐๐ฅ
๐๐ก
=
2๐ฝ
๐ฆ ๐ง
(๐๐ (๐๐−1
โ
๐ฆ
๐๐๐
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ง
+ ๐๐+1
) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 )
(14a)
2๐ฝ ๐ฅ ๐ง
๐ง
๐ฅ
๐ฅ
+ ๐๐+1
) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1
+ ๐๐+1
(๐ (๐
)
โ ๐ ๐−1
(๐๐๐)
๐๐๐๐ง 2๐ฝ ๐ฅ ๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
๐ฅ
๐ฅ
= (๐๐ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 ) − ๐๐ (๐๐−1
+ ๐๐+1
))
๐๐ก
โ
(๐๐๐)
๐๐ก
=−
Since we assume the spin is in the ๐ง-direction, we need to preserve only the product which contains the ๐ง
product and we need to neglect the product ๐คโ๐๐โ ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ฅ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ . Also the
๐ฆ
amplitude of the excitation is small (๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ , ๐๐ โช ๐), we may obtain an approximate set of linear equation
๐ง
๐ง
by taking all ๐๐๐ง = ๐๐−1
= ๐๐+1
= ๐. Then equation (14) becomes
๐๐๐๐ฅ
=
๐๐ก
2๐ฝ๐
๐ฆ
(2๐๐
โ
๐ฆ
๐๐๐
๐๐ก
=−
๐ฆ
๐ฆ
− ๐๐−1 − ๐๐+1 )
2๐ฝ๐
(2๐๐๐ฅ
โ
๐ฅ
๐ฅ
− ๐๐−1
− ๐๐+1
)
๐๐๐๐ง
=0
๐๐ก
(15a)
(15b)
(๐๐๐)
Assuming the traveling wave solution of equation (15a) and (15b)
๐๐๐ฅ = ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐[๐(๐๐๐ − ๐๐ก)]
๐ฆ
๐๐ = ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐[๐(๐๐๐ − ๐๐ก)]
(๐๐)
(๐๐)
๐คโ๐๐๐ ๐ข, ๐ฃ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ก , ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ก
Now, substituting equation (16) and (17) into equation (15a) and (15b),
Equation (15a) becomes
−๐๐ข๐๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) =
2๐ฝ๐
(2๐ฃ๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ฃ๐ ๐((๐−1)๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ฃ๐ ๐((๐+1)๐๐−๐๐ก) )
โ
(๐๐)
If we open up equation (18), we have
−๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก =
2๐ฝ๐
(๐ฃ(2๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก ))
โ
(๐๐)
Collecting the same term on the right side and canceling them with the left side, we have
−๐๐๐ =
๐๐ฑ๐บ
(๐
โ
− ๐−๐๐ − ๐๐๐ )๐ =
๐๐ฑ๐บ
(๐
โ
− ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐)๐
(20)
Similarly Equation (15b) becomes
2๐ฝ๐
(2๐ข๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ข๐ ๐((๐−1)๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ข๐ ๐((๐+1)๐๐−๐๐ก) )
โ
(๐๐)
2๐ฝ๐
(๐ข(2๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก ))
โ
(๐๐)
−๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) =
−๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก =
−๐๐๐ = −
๐๐ฑ๐บ
(๐ −
โ
๐−๐๐๐ − ๐๐๐๐ )๐ = −
๐๐ฑ๐บ
(๐ −
โ
๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐)๐
(23)
Equation (20) and (23) will have non zero solution for ๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐ฃ, if the determinant of the coefficients is
equal to zero
๐๐
|
−
๐๐ฑ๐บ
(๐ − ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐)
โ
๐๐ฑ๐บ
(๐ − ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐)
โ
|=0
๐๐
Solving the determinant, we have
โ๐ = ๐๐ฑ๐บ(๐ − ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐)
(๐๐)
Therefore, Equation (24) is the dispersion relation for spin waves in one dimension with nearest-neighbor
interactions.
๐ญ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐. ๐ท๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก ๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐
0
You can add this document to your study collection(s)
Sign in Available only to authorized usersYou can add this document to your saved list
Sign in Available only to authorized users(For complaints, use another form )