1. Consider three nearest-neighbor spins each of magnitude ๐บ on a line, as shown, coupled by the Heisenberg interaction: ฬ๐ . (๐บ ฬ๐−๐ + ๐บ ฬ๐+๐ ) ๐ผ = −๐๐ฑ๐บ Show that the dispersion for spin waves in one dimension is โ๐ = ๐๐ฑ๐บ(๐ − ๐๐๐ ๐๐). Dispersion Relation is the relationship between ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐. The relation is basically about how the angular frequency varies with the wave vector. The underline concept is when the spins are inclined at an angle to each other, they exert torque on each other. Considering the spin at site p in one dimensional chain, we know from mechanics, the rate of change of the angular momentum is equal to the torque which acts on the spin. โ ๐๐๐ = ๐๐ × ๐ต๐ ๐๐ก (๐) The magnetic moment at site p is given by ๐๐ = −๐๐๐ต ๐๐ (๐) Taking into account the Heisenberg exchange interaction, which says that the interaction is only between the nearest neighbors. That is, ๐๐ can interact only with ๐๐+1 ๐๐๐ ๐๐−1 . And the interaction with other spins will be zero. Taking the above assumption about the Heisenberg interaction, the exchange energy will be given as ๐ = −2๐ฝ๐๐ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 ) (๐) From equation (2), ๐๐ is given as ๐๐ = −๐๐ ๐๐๐ต (๐) Substituting equation (4) in to equation (3) ๐= 2๐ฝ๐๐ + ๐๐+1 ) (๐ ๐๐๐ต ๐−1 (๐) We also know that energy is given by ๐ = −๐๐ โ ๐ต๐ (๐) Equating equation (6) and equation (5), we have −๐๐ โ ๐ต๐ = 2๐ฝ๐๐ + ๐๐+1 ) (๐ ๐๐๐ต ๐−1 (๐) From equation (7), the value of (๐ต๐ ) magnetic field at site p can be given as ๐ต๐ = −2๐ฝ + ๐๐+1 ) (๐ ๐๐๐ต ๐−1 Putting equation (8) and equation (2) in to equation (1) gives us (๐) โ ๐๐๐ −2๐ฝ = (−๐๐๐ต ๐๐ ) × ( + ๐๐+1 )) (๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐ต ๐−1 (๐) Simplifying equation (9), we have ๐๐๐ 2๐ฝ = (๐๐ × ๐๐−1 + ๐๐ × ๐๐+1 ) ๐๐ก โ (๐๐) To solve equation (10), let first solve ๐๐ × ๐๐−1 In Cartesian coordinate ๐๐ × ๐๐−1 ๐ฬ ๐ฅ = | ๐๐ ๐ฅ ๐๐−1 ๐ฬ ๐ฆ ๐๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐−1 ๐ฬ ๐๐๐ง | ๐ง ๐๐−1 ๐ฆ ๐ง ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ฅ ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐๐ × ๐๐−1 = ๐ฬ(๐๐ ๐๐−1 − ๐๐๐ง ๐๐−1 ) − ๐ฬ(๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐−1 − ๐๐๐ง ๐๐−1 ) + ๐ฬ (๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐−1 − ๐๐ ๐๐−1 ) (๐๐) Similarly for ๐๐ × ๐๐+1 ๐๐ × ๐๐−1 ๐ฬ = | ๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐๐+1 ๐ฆ ๐ฬ ๐ฆ ๐๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐+1 ๐ฬ ๐๐๐ง | ๐ง ๐๐+1 ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ง ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐๐ × ๐๐+1 = ๐ฬ(๐๐ ๐๐+1 − ๐๐๐ง ๐๐+1 ) − ๐ฬ(๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐+1 − ๐๐๐ง ๐๐+1 ) + ๐ฬ (๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐+1 − ๐๐ ๐๐+1 ) (๐๐) Substituting equation (11) and equation (12) back into equation (10), we have ๐๐๐ 2๐ฝ ๐ฆ ๐ง ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ง ๐ง ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐ฅ = {๐ฬ(๐๐ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 ) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 )) − ๐ฬ(๐๐๐ฅ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 ) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 )) ๐๐ก โ ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ + ๐ฬ (๐๐๐ฅ (๐ + ๐ ) − ๐๐ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 (๐๐) ))} ๐−1 ๐+1 If we put it in component form ๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐ก = 2๐ฝ ๐ฆ ๐ง (๐๐ (๐๐−1 โ ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ง + ๐๐+1 ) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 ) (14a) 2๐ฝ ๐ฅ ๐ง ๐ง ๐ฅ ๐ฅ + ๐๐+1 ) − ๐๐๐ง (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 (๐ (๐ ) โ ๐ ๐−1 (๐๐๐) ๐๐๐๐ง 2๐ฝ ๐ฅ ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ฆ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ = (๐๐ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 ) − ๐๐ (๐๐−1 + ๐๐+1 )) ๐๐ก โ (๐๐๐) ๐๐ก =− Since we assume the spin is in the ๐ง-direction, we need to preserve only the product which contains the ๐ง product and we need to neglect the product ๐คโ๐๐โ ๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ฅ ๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ . Also the ๐ฆ amplitude of the excitation is small (๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ , ๐๐ โช ๐), we may obtain an approximate set of linear equation ๐ง ๐ง by taking all ๐๐๐ง = ๐๐−1 = ๐๐+1 = ๐. Then equation (14) becomes ๐๐๐๐ฅ = ๐๐ก 2๐ฝ๐ ๐ฆ (2๐๐ โ ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ก =− ๐ฆ ๐ฆ − ๐๐−1 − ๐๐+1 ) 2๐ฝ๐ (2๐๐๐ฅ โ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ − ๐๐−1 − ๐๐+1 ) ๐๐๐๐ง =0 ๐๐ก (15a) (15b) (๐๐๐) Assuming the traveling wave solution of equation (15a) and (15b) ๐๐๐ฅ = ๐ข๐๐ฅ๐[๐(๐๐๐ − ๐๐ก)] ๐ฆ ๐๐ = ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐[๐(๐๐๐ − ๐๐ก)] (๐๐) (๐๐) ๐คโ๐๐๐ ๐ข, ๐ฃ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ก , ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐ก๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐ก Now, substituting equation (16) and (17) into equation (15a) and (15b), Equation (15a) becomes −๐๐ข๐๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) = 2๐ฝ๐ (2๐ฃ๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ฃ๐ ๐((๐−1)๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ฃ๐ ๐((๐+1)๐๐−๐๐ก) ) โ (๐๐) If we open up equation (18), we have −๐๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก = 2๐ฝ๐ (๐ฃ(2๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก )) โ (๐๐) Collecting the same term on the right side and canceling them with the left side, we have −๐๐๐ = ๐๐ฑ๐บ (๐ โ − ๐−๐๐ − ๐๐๐ )๐ = ๐๐ฑ๐บ (๐ โ − ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐)๐ (20) Similarly Equation (15b) becomes 2๐ฝ๐ (2๐ข๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ข๐ ๐((๐−1)๐๐−๐๐ก) − ๐ข๐ ๐((๐+1)๐๐−๐๐ก) ) โ (๐๐) 2๐ฝ๐ (๐ข(2๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก − ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก )) โ (๐๐) −๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐(๐๐๐−๐๐ก) = −๐๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ −๐๐๐ก = −๐๐๐ = − ๐๐ฑ๐บ (๐ − โ ๐−๐๐๐ − ๐๐๐๐ )๐ = − ๐๐ฑ๐บ (๐ − โ ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐)๐ (23) Equation (20) and (23) will have non zero solution for ๐ข ๐๐๐ ๐ฃ, if the determinant of the coefficients is equal to zero ๐๐ | − ๐๐ฑ๐บ (๐ − ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐) โ ๐๐ฑ๐บ (๐ − ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐) โ |=0 ๐๐ Solving the determinant, we have โ๐ = ๐๐ฑ๐บ(๐ − ๐๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐) (๐๐) Therefore, Equation (24) is the dispersion relation for spin waves in one dimension with nearest-neighbor interactions. ๐ญ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐. ๐ท๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ค๐๐กโ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก ๐๐๐๐โ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ก๐๐๐๐