Uploaded by Vincent Koh

MT5006 Week 1

advertisement
Week 1
MT5006/IE5211
Jim White
Stage Gate
•
•
•
•
Mid to Large Size companies
Large, Global Teams
Complex Products/Services
Pipeline Management
Lean NPI
•
•
•
•
Start‐ups
Entrepreneurs
Less Complex Products/Services
Single Project
Agile
•
•
•
•
Any size
Small, Co‐located Teams
Software
Pipeline Management
Sector
Food
Textiles
Pharmaceutical
Plastics and Rubber Products
Communications Equipment
Semiconductor
Electrical and Appliances
Motor Vehicles
Aerospace
Software Publishers
Telecom Services
Finance and Insurance
Health Care Serv ices
Global Sales R&D Spend
R&D Spend
(billions)
(billions)
(% to Sales)
$463
$169
$529
$264
$132
$192
$172
$776
$457
$317
$501
$435
$30
$4
$1
$69
$3
$14
$28
$4
$38
$12
$35
$9
$1
$1
0.86%
0.59%
13.04%
1.14%
10.61%
14.58%
2.33%
4.90%
2.63%
11.04%
1.80%
0.23%
3.33%
Global R&D Spend $1.5 Trillion Globally (2013)
2% of GWP $71.8 Trillion
Winning at New Products, R G Cooper
Winning at New Products, R G Cooper
Effectiveness = Sales from New Products/R&D Spend
Winning at New Products, R G Cooper
Hardware
Service
Startup
Enterprise
Anyone that wants a profitable,
timely new product launch!!!
Business Leverage
 Many Quality Problems are Designed In
 Greatest Impact of Product Quality/Cost is During Design
Manufacturing
Defects Way of doing business
Designed‐In
Quality/Cost Issues
Eliminate the problem before it is created.
Performance (VOC) Tolerances
Natural (VOP) Tolerances
LSL
Level of
Product
Robustness
LCL
USL
Cp =
Comes from Great
Marketing….
y
‐ LSL
6
VOP
What the customer wants
UCL
USL
= 2
Comes from Great
Engineering…
What company will deliver
VOC
VOP = Voice of the
Physics within the Product
or Mfg. Process
Idea





Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
A well defined, but flexible process for moving new
products through the pipeline
Intended to be multi‐functional
Improve both effectiveness and efficiency in NPI
Provides a set of deliverables and tasks at each stage
Requires decision making to move ahead
A Process to Manage Risk
“Winning at New Products”
Robert Cooper
Design Thinking
Business Plan
Idea
Concept
Ideas
Feasibility
Dev’t
Concepts
Scale Up
Launch
Product
Post‐
Launch
Radical
Breakthrough
Platform
Incremental
Deliverables
Tasks will address a
deliverable
Tools make gathering
information more
quantitative and credible
Task 1
Tool 1
Task 2
Tool 2
Tool 3

Tools are a quantitative way to gather and analyze
information
◦ Examples: SWOT, QFD, Pugh Analysis
◦ ALWAYS GIGO!

You are the architect for your project and product
◦ You decide which tools you will need to make critical decisions
◦ No two projects are the same and your experience will help to
guide your team to success by knowing what needs to be
done
Idea





Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Begin with the product or service idea
Identify market potential for new product or service ideas.
Gather Voice of Market (VOM) input and identify attractive
market segments.
Evaluate the market opportunity against strategic direction
and financial objectives.
Initial alignment with technologies or product ideas
Know Your Market!
Idea





Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Gather customer needs, Voice of Customer (VOC)
Translate into product/service requirements.
Develop and evaluate multiple product and/or service
concepts.
Identify the superior concepts.
Generate a preliminary business opportunity assessment.
What Problem are you Solving!
Idea





Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Select the best concept and identify the technical solution.
Demonstrate that the solution is stable when stressed with
nominal noise.
Validate that the solution meets the customer
requirements.
Quantify the value proposition for the solution with the
customer.
Develop the business case for the project.
Value Proposition!!!
Idea





Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Develop a robust product/service that is optimized to
customer requirements (Design for Six Sigma).
Field test the product to validate customer acceptance
Develop a marketing plan to maximize the value
proposition.
Verify product capability at bench top or pilot plant against
the customer tolerances.
Refine the manufacturing plan in preparation of scale up.
Start Spending Money!
Idea






Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Optimize the process in the targeted manufacturing site
Demonstrate long term capability.
Finalize product responsibility items and regulatory
clearances.
Finalize the Marketing plan (including launch plan)
Finalize Manufacturing plan (including supply chain plan)
Validate the business plan with test market
It’s Hard to Turn Back Now!
Idea





Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Execute the launch plans (e.g. train sales staff, build
inventory, prepare marketing collateral, etc.)
Demonstrate control of the Manufacturing and Sales &
Marketing control plans.
Review project, compare actual with projected results
Identify product improvement opportunities.
Develop the hand‐off plan to transition the new product
into ongoing business operations.
The Handoff!
Idea




Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Verify business opportunity is being achieved
Manage product value chain for maximum return
Use the control plans developed in Launch
Use Lean Six Sigma tools for continuous improvement
Gather customer feedback to identify opportunities for
new products.
The Payoff!
Idea
Concept
Feasibility
Dev’t
Scale Up
Launch
Post‐
Launch
Manage risk insuring deliverables meet
objectives
 NPI phase objectives & deliverables create the
template for each gate review
 Make a data driven Decision!

◦ Go, NO‐GO, Go Back
Pass
Conditional Pass
Low Risk
Moderate Risk
Gate
Review
Don’t Pass
Kill
High Risk
High Risk

Very Often Executives, Key Stakeholders, VCs

Gatekeepers ask:
◦ Did the work done provide the information necessary to assess
the risk for this phase?
◦ Is the data believable and does it support moving onto the next
phase?
◦ Is there additional work necessary to complete the risk
assessment at this phase?
◦ Is the project still strategic?
◦ Is there a good plan for the next phase?
◦ Is it resourced?
“Know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ‘em”
Download