Testimonial Evidence A witness is one who, being present, personally sees or perceives a thing, a beholder, spectator or eyewitness. One who testifies to what he has seen or heard, or otherwise observed 2 All persons who can perceive, and perceiving, can make known their perception to others, may be witnesses. 3 a. b. c. d. He/she can perceive He/she can make known his perception He/she must take an oath or affirmation He/she must not possess any of the disqualifications 4 Qualification of a witness is determined at the time the said witness is produced for examination or at the taking of their depositions. 5 General rule: Not disqualified Exception: a person convicted of any of the following crimes cannot be a witness to a will: a. Falsification of documents, b. Perjury; or c. False testimony 6 One is qualified to take the witness stand if: a. He is capable of perceiving at the time of the occurrence of the fact; and b. He came make his perception known 7 A person who takes the witness stand is presumed to possess the qualifications of a witness. His competence may be questioned by the other party by interposing an objection. 8 Credibility has nothing to do with the law or the rules. It refers to the weight and trustworthiness or reliability of the testimony. 9 EFFECT OF INTEREST IN THE SUBJECT MATTER - not disqualified EFFECT OF RELATIONSHIP – not disqualified 10 Disqualification by Reason of Marriage Elements: 1. During their marriage: i. The marriage must be valid and existing at the time of the offer of the testimony 2. The husband or the wife cannot testify against the other i. The “other” spouse must be a party to the action, either as a plaintiff or defendant 3. Without the consent of the affected spouse Except: Spouse may testify against the other even without the consent of the latter: 1. In a civil case by one against the other; or 2. In a criminal case for a crime committed by one against the other or the latter's direct descendants/ascendants 1. There is identity of interests between husband and wife; 2. If one were to testify against the other, there is a consequent danger of perjury; 3. Policy of the law is to guard the security and confidence of private life, and to prevent domestic disunion and unhappiness; and 4. Where there is want of domestic tranquility, there is danger of punishing one spouse through the hostile testimony of the other 14 General rule: During their marriage Exception: Where the marital and domestic relations are so strained that there is no more harmony to be preserved nor peace and tranquility which may be disturbed, the reason based upon such harmony and tranquility fails. In such a case, identity of interests disappears, and the consequent danger of perjury based on that identity is non-existent The rule also includes utterance as to facts or mere production of documents. It does not only prevent disclosure of matters communicated in nuptial confidence but is an absolute prohibition against the spouse’s testifying to any facts affecting the other however these facts may have been acquired. Disqualifications by Reason of Privileged Communications × × × × × Marital Privilege Attorney-Client Privilege Physician-Patient Privilege Priest-Penitent Privilege Public Officers 18 A privilege is a rule of law that, to protect a particular relationship or interest, either permits a witness to refrain from giving testimony he otherwise could be compelled to give, or permits someone usually one of the parties, to prevent the witness from revealing certain information. Privilege may only be invoked by the persons protected thereunder. Also known as marital privilege Rationale × Confidential nature of the privilege; to preserve marital and domestic relations 20 1. The husband or the wife 2. During or after the marriage 3. Cannot be examined 4. Without the consent of the other 5. As to any communication received in confidence by one from the other during the marriage 21 Except: Spouse may testify for or against the other even without the consent of the latter: 1. In a civil case by one against the other, or 2. In a criminal case for a crime committed by one against the other or the latter’s direct descendants or ascendants. 22 Scope: “Any communication” Includes utterances, either oral or written, or acts is produced for examination or at the taking of their depositions. 23 1. When the communication was not intended to be kept in confidence 2. When the communication was made prior to the marriage 3. Waiver of the privilege 24 Elements: As regards an attorney or any person reasonably believed by the client to be licensed to engage in the practice of law : 1. Without the consent of his client 2. Cannot be examined as to: a. Any communication made by the client to him/her, or b. His/her advice given thereon in the course of, or with a view to, professional employment 26 As regards an attorney’s secretary, stenographer, clerk, or other persons assisting the attorney : 1. Without the consent of the client and his/her employer 2. Cannot be examined 3. Concerning any fact the knowledge of which has been acquired in such capacity 27 1. Communications 2. Observations by the lawyer (regardless of medium of transmission which may include oral or written words and actions) 3. Tangible evidence delivered to a lawyer 4. Documents entrusted to a lawyer 28 1. Furtherance of crime or fraud: a. If the services or advice of the lawyer were sought or obtained b. To enable or aid anyone c. To commit or plan to commit d. What the client knew or reasonably should have known to be a crime or Fraud 2. Claimants through same deceased client a. As to communication relevant to an issue between parties who b. Claim through the same deceased client c. Regardless of whether the claims are by testate, intestate, or inter vivos transaction 3. Breach of duty by lawyer or client a. As to communications relevant to an issue of breach of duty: i. By the lawyer to his/her client; or ii. By the client to his/her lawyer 31 4. Document attested by the lawyer: a. As to communication relevant to an issue concerning an attested document b. The lawyer is an attesting witness 32 5. Joint clients a. As to a communication relevant to a matter of common interest between two or more clients b. The communication was made by any of them to c. The lawyer retained or consulted in common d. Communication is offered in an action between any of the clients e. Neither expressly agreed otherwise 33 General rule: The attorney-client privilege may not be invoked to refuse to divulge the identity of the client. 34 1. When a strong probability exists that revealing the name would implicate that person in the very same activity for which he sought the lawyer’s advice; 2. When disclosure would open the client to liability; 3. When the name would furnish the only link that would form the chain of testimony necessary to convict In the absence of a statute, the privilege is permanent. It may even be claimed by a client’s executor or administrator after the client’s death Elements: 1. A physician, psychotherapist or person reasonably believed by the patient to be authorized to practice medicine or psychotherapy a. Psychotherapist: Person licensed to practice medicine engaged in the diagnosis or treatment of a mental or emotional condition; or a person licensed as a psychologist by the government while similarly engaged Elements: 2. In a civil case the privilege cannot be claimed in a criminal case because the interest of the public in a criminal prosecution should be deemed more important than the secrecy of the communication Elements: 3. Without the consent of the patient 4. Cannot be examined as to a. Any confidential communication made between the patient and his/her physician or psychotherapist b. For the purpose of diagnosis or treatment i. Of the patient’s physical, mental, or emotional condition ii. Including drug or alcohol addiction this privilege also applies to persons, including members of the patient’s family, who have participated in the diagnosis or treatment of the patient under the direction of the physician or psychotherapist. 40 1. Communication was not given in confidence 2. Communication was irrelevant to the professional employment 3. Communication was made for an unlawful purpose 4. Communication was intended for the commission/ concealment of a crime 5. Communication was intended to be made public/divulged in court 41 6. When there was a waiver 7. When the doctor was presented as an expert witness and only hypothetical problems were presented to him 42 Elements: 1. A minister or priest or person reasonably believed to be so 2. Without the consent of the affected person 3. Cannot be examined as to any a. communication; or b. confession made to; or c. advice given by him/her 43 Elements: 4. in his/her professional character 5. in the course of discipline enjoined by the church to which the minister or priest belongs 44 Elements: 1. A public officer 2. During or after his/her tenure 3. Cannot be examined as to communications made to him/her in official confidence 4. When the court finds that the public interest would suffer by the disclosure 45 1. Must relate to a “quintessential and nondelegable presidential power;” 2. Must be authored or “solicited and received” by a close advisor of the President or the President himself; and 3. Privilege may be overcome by a showing of adequate need such that the information sought “likely contains important evidence” and by the unavailability of the information elsewhere 46 The communication shall remain privileged, even in the hands of a third person who may have obtained the information, provided that the original parties to the communication took reasonable precaution to protect its confidentiality 47